Your operational definition of indoctrination seems to include forcing someone to follow a religion. Indoctrination merely implies teaching someone the tenants of a religion. Children are likely to believe anything you teach them so is this forcing religion on them in a roundabout way? Maybe so, but just the same as anything else you teach them. Do we have a right to feed our children bacon if by doing so we train them to eat too much bacon and suffer negative health affects? No, we feed them bacon and acknowledge that some day they will know enough to make their own decisions about the appropriate role of bacon in their life. Same with religion. It is by no means a violation of a person's rights to be taught a religion at a young age. If in the course of their life they blindly follow what they've been taught without serious investigation and a commitment to apply their own mental faculties to that faith then they will simply have this not-that-into-it spirituality like most "Christians" in developed nations. If indoctrination is served with discouragement against this kind of critical thought then it is wrong and I think you are generalizing that the two always go together, and in a large part you are correct, but it is not necessarily so. It isn't the way I was indoctrinated. My parents taught me about their faith and then they let me struggle with making it my own thing instead of just forcing me to do it no matter how I felt about it. The group that you are accusing of raising their children this way, however, remains ambiguous, as our original example is satirical.