If atheism were true, why do cats have pretty stripes on them? Why do the millions of insect species have such startling beauty? Why does man feel guilty when he sins? Why does anyone have a will? Where did personality come from? On top of all this, it is considered, of course!) scientifically impossible for nothing to create anything, much less, for nothing to create everything!

Creationists who point to creatures humans find beautiful as evidence of a divine creation by their god Yahweh seem blind to other less pleasing inhabitants of the Earth.

UK national treasure David Attenborough revealed this week that he gets hate mail from creationists for not crediting God for the wonders of nature in his documentaries.

"They always mean beautiful things like hummingbirds," he told Radio Times magazine. "I always reply by saying that I think of a little child in east Africa with a worm burrowing through his eyeball. The worm cannot live in any other way, except by burrowing through eyeballs."

Reference: Eye-burrowing worms, national treasures... and creationism

That is one of the silliest arguments I've encountered for creationism. I understand some biologists might find some parasites "beautiful." But few others would. E.g., see Doctors in Honduras removed a 2 centimeter long botfly larva from a child's eye socket. Warning: Not for the squeamish. Or see Mark Twain's writings on the fly What kind of god designs such creatures to plague mankind and other creatures?

And for the last argument that it is impossible for nothing to create anything, then what created Yahweh? Was it some other god? There were some early Christians such as the Gnostics and Marcionites who believed the creator god of the Old Testament was a lesser god, a demiurge.

And if they say "God has always existed", one could as well say that we live in an oscillating universe with no beginning nor an end. Even if one accepted the cosmological argument that there was a "first cause" that was itself uncaused doesn't necessarily mean that first cause was an anthropomorphic god such as most Christians envision. One might just as well call that first cause "Nature." The American architect, writer, and educator Frank Lloyd Wright wrote:

I believe in God, only I spell it "Nature".

Or as Daniel Henson wrote in the Dossier of Reason

This is special pleading. It is an argument that says all laws of logic apply except for in my special case. If you can continue to ask where the matter or cause came from to cause something comes from an infinite amount of times, why should we accept the answer of god as the final answer? What caused god? How did something come from nothing and make god? What is the difference between a universe that was created by a god that always existed and and a universe that has always existed? Why is it unreasonable to suggest an infinite multi-verse as one possibility, but reasonable to suggest an infinite god? Assuming god is the answer does not solve the initial problem. Why add a unobservable layer to what we actually can observe and then give it special properties that violate what we can observe?