this post was submitted on
1,379 points (58% like it)
4,585 up votes 3,206 down votes

funny

subscribe2,403,736 readers

9,553 users here now

PLEASE, No posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.


Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress.

  • Rage comics - Go to /fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 243

[–]TheThingToSay 55 points56 points ago

Cops exist to serve and protect right? So shouldn't they thank this guy? The cops set up a speed trap because it's dangerous to speed...this guy warns people of their presence causing them to not speed, thus eliminating the danger. What's the problem? Cops can't meet their quotas?

[–]DjWater 11 points12 points ago

Well, in my area, the major problem I see with speed traps is that they make cars slow down too much, which I see can cause more accidents than it's preventing. Once, I saw a speed trap on the fucking highway!the fucking highway! Which made people go from 60mph to around 30-40 mph which can be really dangerous.

[–]CervantesD 3 points4 points ago

This needs to be an issue

[–]Sebasguerrero 1 point2 points ago

The main counter to you point is... what happens to the severity of the accidents as the speeds are increased? Also, that paper was written in 92 when speed limits on a lot of interstates were still 55, they have already been increased to 65-70-75 mph, and therefore the conclusions of the paper might not apply. And finally, I think you are overlooking the main argument of the paper... that people generally tend to drive at whatever speed they feel comfortable driving. Technically... speed limits should not be used to limit the speeds of the median car, but rather to limit the speeds of cars at the extremes... because it is the variance in speeds that is the really case of accidents.

[–]chobi83 5 points6 points ago

The problem is, as soon as they pass the cop, they go right back to speeding. So, no, they are not eliminating the danger.

[–]choppysmash 5 points6 points ago

So, by that logic, the cops aren't helping the problem either. People see the cop, slow down, and once they pass the cop they just speed back up.

[–]HotRodLincoln 4 points5 points ago

People see a cop slow down way too fast to below the speed limit, then cause more danger.

[–]detroitluv 0 points1 point ago

When I go on road trips, I generally set my cruise control 2 to 4 miles above the speed limit. If I see a police car, I hit the coast button once or twice to bring me down to the speed limit. I wish I would have started to do this sooner as I have a number of speeding tickets on my record that adversely affect my car insurance rates.

[–]conversionbot 1 point2 points ago

4 miles = 6.44 kilometers

[–]choppysmash 2 points3 points ago

THIS! If someone is holding up a sign they are giving people more time to slow down safely. Of course the ideal solution would be for people to not speed but then there would be no point in having traffic cops...

[–]PhydeauxFido 2 points3 points ago

Then they could lower the speed limits further.

Or like one town outside of the city did... They would put up a portable speed limit sign on the Interstate, lowering the speed limit from 70 to 40 mph, after a blind corner, with multiple cops busting people.

[–]conversionbot 2 points3 points ago

40 mph = 64.37 km/h

[–]blazingscience 0 points1 point ago

Why is the bot getting downvoted?

[–]thearsenal14 0 points1 point ago

They could also get a ticket if they didn't slow down in time or notice the cop. I slowed down after getting my first ticket, can be expensive.

[–]doubleherpes 1 point2 points ago

that sounds like quitter talk. you just need to step up your game. it's a battle of wills!

[–]TheThingToSay 0 points1 point ago

They are eliminating the danger in that particular area. People who speed still speed after getting a ticket because speed limits are set arbitrarily low in many places just to be a choke point for police to make money.

[–]HotRodLincoln 1 point2 points ago

35mph speed limit on a road with a 45º slope.

[–]MisterNixon 0 points1 point ago

There's one right near school, it's near impossible to drive under 40 without melting your brakes.

[–]SirPasta117 1 point2 points ago

True. There is a side street near my home in front of several business/banks/restraunts that for some reason has a speed limit of 15...and the road has a pretty good slope going down one way. Where do I see most police hanging out? Along this street.

[–]PumbaBear 0 points1 point ago

So that is where all this "20 is plenty" BULL SHIT is coming from...

[–]The_Vagina_Whisperer 1 point2 points ago

"Eliminating the danger" is not the point of speed traps, and yes people speed back up after they pass. The point is to increase the perceived risk of being caught at any time while driving. Every speed trap you slow down for enforces the thought "Better watch my speed." and it sticks with you.

Also: revenue from traffic fines.

[–]760177841 -1 points0 points ago

This makes plenty of sense and is logical. Not sure why you're getting downvotes. Traffic cops are unfortunately a necessary evil because of stupid ass drivers. I hate seeing a speed trap, but love seeing a kid in a beamer with an ice cream paint job driving like a jackass getting pulled over. Unfortunately, lots of municipalities abuse the tickets as revenue with artificially low speed limits, but that's just a sad fact of life.

[–]MonacoE92 1 point2 points ago

But lets be realistic, this guy will probably be arrested. Theres always the type of person that says "This guy is helping law breakers!" and ends up ratting him out to the cops. And cops like their money, this guy will either be fined or arrested sadly. Free speech is not so free when it comes to the government.

[–]I_am_not_novel 3 points4 points ago

Let's be realistic. He will not be arrested because he is not doing anything illegal.

[–]MonacoE92 3 points4 points ago

Wow, naive much?

She wasn't doing anything illegal either... http://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/vuj99/texas_woman_holding_speed_trap_sign_gets_arrested/

Nor were they: http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/jy5bi/cops_in_florida_written_thousands_of_tickets_to/

You and anyone who upvotes your post is nothing but naive and has no experience with the way things work in a police state. At the very least the guy will probably get fined. Let's not pretend we are in a perfect world with mostly good cops that don't mind people disrupting their revenue machine.

[–]skeletor100 -1 points0 points ago

The comments in that first link you provided directly dispute what you are claiming. ಠ_ಠ

[–]MonacoE92 1 point2 points ago

You mean the woman who holds up a "speed trap ahead" sign and gets arrested for doing it, then later released with jaywalking or some other BS charge? It proves that cops will do anything they can including arresting you and making up charges to try and silence someone disrupting their revenue stream. The woman spent 48 hours in jail for holding up that sign and has a jaywalking fine, THAT is what they can do when you "aren't doing anything illegal".

[–]FadedBlaze -2 points-1 points ago

nor we're they

If you read the second link you posted it actually does state they weren't doing anything illegal

[–]MonacoE92 4 points5 points ago

Right... and so is my point... it's not illegal... but still were ticketed... still were arrested..

Does no one see a pattern here? Not illegal but punished anyway? No? Just me?

[–]isofat 0 points1 point ago

This is actually illegal. You can even get a ticket if a cop sees you flash your lights to warn other drivers of cops.

[–]MonacoE92 2 points3 points ago

It's not illegal, he is right. It's just that cops try very hard to stop you from doing it. Meaning they try and use Obstruction of Justice, or some BS law on blinding people with your hi-beams (at daytime...), even though none of them apply. The goal for them is to scare you and/or try and make you hire an attorney and waste money, with the goal being you don't do it next time.

[–]mello51 0 points1 point ago

I don't know about the BS part. I'm not sure what the law is where you are but here in the UK you can be prosecuted for obstructing a police officer if you try to warn motorists of a speed trap, it happened to this chap who tried to argue he was doing his civc duty in preventing people from slowing down suddenly potentially causing an accident, they found him guilty anyway, bastards. http://www.roadsafetygb.org.uk/news/1380.html

[–]Otiac 1 point2 points ago

The UK is basically a police state as it is. Have fun tweeting.

[–]MonacoE92 0 points1 point ago

You realize that UK has different laws than the US right? In the US, the officer has to be investigating a CRIME, not a traffic infraction, in order to say someone is obstructing justice. Yet they still use it anyway. Most of the time changing the charge later on to something lesser (like loitering or jaywalking).

[–]nonironiccomment 0 points1 point ago

A traffic infraction is a crime in the eyes of the law. You can be arrested for any crime committed in an officers presence.

[–]gixxer600 21 points22 points ago

Misunderstood samaritan: There actually aren't cops ahead. He is just trying to get everyone to slow down and drive safe.

[–]llbean 84 points85 points ago

There are people in this thread calling this guy out, "if your driving legally then it doesn't matter if there are cops ahead", fuck that, I appreciate a heads up cause I don't want to be screwed on a years worth of insurance just because I'm going a few miles over the limit and the cop has got a quota to fill.

[–]skeletor100 5 points6 points ago

I agree with this in the case of speed traps. The objective of speed cameras isn't supposed to be increasing revenue but decreasing speed. So by warning people of a speed camera you are helping fulfill it's purpose in making people slow down.

I don't agree where people do this for drunk driving stops. That is just allowing someone who is idiotically causing a danger to themselves and others.

[–]happlepaff 0 points1 point ago

How do they handle speed traps in America? In the UK the cameras are in big yellow boxes and there are signs pointing out that cameras are in the area, even for the mobile ones, so it's pretty easy to tell whether you're going to get caught.

[–]MisterNixon 0 points1 point ago

Most speed traps in America are done by the cops themselves with radar guns. Often times it's just a single cruiser but can sometimes be a major operation with multiple cops with one using the radar and the other cops to flag down drivers and issue citations.

At my old job I got pretty attuned to where cops would usually sit and you'd be alright as long as you managed to slow down before you reached those spots.

[–]ThEgg 1 point2 points ago

We're too backwards-minded to allow smart decisions like that. Speed traps are handled in the way of a police officer squatting in a location, without any forewarning, and waiting for a violator. In such case, he is free to make a judgement on what he wants to clock the speed for on the ticket.

[–]llbean -1 points0 points ago

could not agree with you more, if the purpose is road safety, then yes, by all means go ahead, but I will say this, I slow the fuck down when someone flashes me, sometimes people just do it to tell you to slow down in which case i also appreciate it. drunk driving ought not be condoned, in any fashion.

[–]noideaman 15 points16 points ago

I agree. Sure, you shouldn't be "breaking the law" (assuming it's a reasonable law), but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be concerned with what law enforcement is doing even if you're not breaking the law. That's how rights start being violated.

[–]choppysmash 0 points1 point ago

Yeah and it can save otherwise safe and reasonable drivers from a ticket for accidentally going a few mph over the limit.

[–]MedievalManagement -1 points0 points ago

I see what you did there.

[–]Gecko20 0 points1 point ago

Quotas are a myth...

[–]lpisme 30 points31 points ago

Random misdemeanor charges in 3....2....1...

[–]CrazyBunnyLady 17 points18 points ago

I'm not sure why you are getting down voted. This is illegal where I live.

[–]smpx -3 points-2 points ago

How? Isn't this protected by freedom of speech? How is this harmful?

[–]MisterNixon 1 point2 points ago

Depends on the state which makes the variance of the law rather absurd. New York state supreme court ruled in a case that it was fair game for drivers to do it after a cop bagged a guy for flashing his beams to warn other drivers.

[–]CrazyBunnyLady 0 points1 point ago

Freedom of speech doesn't entitle you to interfere with police doing their duty - at least in Canada. As with many laws it is likely only enforced when it is causing some harm. I don't know when that would be, but I don't have a criminal mind so I doubt I could even guess.

[–]MonacoE92 1 point2 points ago

In the US Obstruction of Justice can only be charged if the cop is investigating a crime. It is NOT illegal to warn via sign of police presence or flash your hi-beams to warn people. But that doesn't mean the cops won't lie or try and find something to get you on. They can't have people disrupting their revenue machine.

[–]CrazyBunnyLady 0 points1 point ago

Thank you. I didn't know what the difference was between the two countries.

[–]Cramenator87 1 point2 points ago

Obstruction of tax collection... it's a crime worse than murder.

[–]AaronPetykowski -2 points-1 points ago

This is also illegal in Illinois, according to my Driver's Ed teacher. He didn't say why, although it kind of interferes with the police's duties, even if it slows drivers. I mean, I would assume a driver would learn not to speed from receiving a ticket than any other form. Also, if one breaks the law they should receive repercussions instead of doing it once more another day and something much more serious happens, such as a car crash that could kill someone(s).

[–]MisterNixon 0 points1 point ago

According to wiki it usually falls under laws against having flashing lights on a non emergency vehicle, blinding other drivers, or interfering with a police investigation.

[–]AaronPetykowski 0 points1 point ago

The last one sounds the most correct.

[–]dlink 5 points6 points ago

"Obstruction"

[–]LarryTheSatelliteGuy 0 points1 point ago

saw a story on the news about this exact situation, might even be the source of this picture, idk. But anyways the guy got arrested and then beat it in court

[–]MonacoE92 -1 points0 points ago

Why do so many people say "Obstruction"? Does NO ONE understand that in order for Obstruction of Justice to be charged the cop has to be investigating a CRIME? Not a traffic infraction.

Learn some of US law people, educate yourselves so you don't end up believing some power tripping cop when he says you're obstructing, cause you aren't.

[–]jianthekorean 3 points4 points ago

Isn't this considered obstruction of justice?

[–]Meanest_Phlebotomist 0 points1 point ago

No, courts in the US have ruled that this is covered under freedom of speech (as is flashing your lights to warn other drivers).

[–]jianthekorean 0 points1 point ago

Duly noted.

[–]lpisme 0 points1 point ago

That wouldn't stop a police officer from trying to charge an individual with a number of other things. For instance, he/she could claim that by flashing the high beams they intentionally put the other driver at risk. There's a charge.

I'm not saying it's right - i'm all for speed trap warnings - but even though it is protected under freedom of speech I bet there are a few ways to still charge an individual.

[–]SlimGuySB 0 points1 point ago

Don't flash with high-beams - momentarily drop to side lights at night and then back up. Flashing hi beams distracting a driver during the day would be hard to prove, to say the least.

[–]MonacoE92 0 points1 point ago

Obstruction can only be charged when the cop is investigating a crime, not a traffic infraction.

[–]Pwnstar_Dancin 23 points24 points ago

Going to go ahead and ask. . . . how in the fuck is he being merciful? In no way is this civilian showing mercy.

[–]GustavoFrings 1 point2 points ago

I would consider an act that spares my bank account a few hundred dollars because of my stupidity merciful. I was speeding. Read the sign, slowed down. Mercy.

[–]trullette 3 points4 points ago

I'd like to do this/see someone do this in areas where people drive stupidly.. but when there is no cop there. Anything to get people to drive safely and not endanger others is a win.

[–]5shot6shot7shotfloor 6 points7 points ago

I always respect those GGDrivers who flash their headlights for this same reason.

[–]Throwaway281281 7 points8 points ago

I never know what they're flashing for though! 'oh god are my lights off? Have I done sonething wrong? Are you just a fag? Police ahead? You went over a bump? Tell me what you want from meeee!!'

[–]Galahad4615 5 points6 points ago

Could also be a hazard up ahead like a deer or your high beams are on. But pretty much if your high beams are not on, slow your ass down!

[–]Throwaway281281 0 points1 point ago

I've got one of those trackers that the insurance company fits. So even if I do speed(even just a little) and I don't get caught by police or cameras, I still pay for it with increased premiums :(

[–]PuppSocket 1 point2 points ago

What is the incentive to allow your insurer to monitor your travels? I am keeping an open mind about the concept, but curious how much money you save by doing this.

[–]skeddles 3 points4 points ago

Sounds like he's losing more than anything!

I say rip it off.

[–]Throwaway281281 1 point2 points ago

It was more a requirement really, no tracker, no insurance. The premiums do go down if you drive safely, but they go up if you don't. I'm 21 so paying £800 for insurance with a tracker on a multicar policy is much better than paying £3000 for my own policy with no tracker. Seriously, that was the BEST quote!

[–]PhydeauxFido 0 points1 point ago

The trackers in my country mainly only measure the % of throttle and braking you use. They don't measure your speed on a given road.

A lot of heavy accelerating and braking is signs of an aggressive driver, and can cause you to have higher premiums.

[–]Throwaway281281 0 points1 point ago

My tracker measures those two things, as well as speed on a given road, cornering severity, weather you travel to a single place frequently(like a place of work) and time of day used. So if I use it frequently between 11pm and 7am it goes against me, because apparently rose are 'danger times'. Feels like you've got a backseat driver in there, all the damn time.

[–]PhydeauxFido 1 point2 points ago

wow, that's nuts. Is that permanent or for a limited time?

[–]Throwaway281281 1 point2 points ago

I know! I think it's permanent, for the first year anyway. But you do have to pay £90 for them to take it out again, and if you cancel the insurance they keep it sending information anonymously for 'research'

[–]mr1337 0 points1 point ago

I think the incentive is to prove to the insurance company that you're a safe driver. If he speeds, I don't think his insurance would go higher than if he had not had the tracker, however.

[–]Throwaway281281 2 points3 points ago

You would be surprised, apparently the penalties are pretty steep. Also if I ever go over 100mph, the insurance is immediately and automatically canceled.

[–]OliveTheory 0 points1 point ago

Yep. Flashing headlights for road hazards is a common practice. Running into a 1000+ pound cow at any speed will ruin your day.

[–]_beeks 2 points3 points ago

Check your lights. If they're on but high beams are off, expect cops.

[–]MonacoE92 0 points1 point ago

Flashing lights usually means one of three things:

  1. Lights are off or on hi-beam
  2. Hazard in road ahead (deer, debris in road, pigs on fire, etc etc)
  3. Speed trap ahead.

Slow down for a few mins, check your lights, and you're good.

[–]Throwaway281281 0 points1 point ago

Pigs on fire? Speed up! There's bacon to be had!

[–]derpbynature 0 points1 point ago

There was a law in Florida that made this illegal, but some court struck it down, saying it fell under the first amendment.

[–]majorkev 1 point2 points ago

I have a better idea...

Don't drive like a twonk.

[–]GhettoKid 5 points6 points ago

TIL "Twonk"

[–]brassiron 2 points3 points ago

For everyone who doesn't know.

Twonk: a stupid person; rubbish "What Twonk you are talking!"; to hit (someone); to slap (someone). en.wiktionary.org/wiki/twonk

[–]TemptationsPage 2 points3 points ago

"A real patriot is the fellow who gets a parking ticket and rejoices that the system works."

This is a Bill Vaughan quote, a man I had never heard of until hearing this quote. But it really hit home with me.

No ones wants a speeding ticket, but our communities, rightfully so, have decided that the quality of all of our lives is improved by keeping roads safe.

To speed, or to break the law in general, is an affront to that community.

Now, this isn't some Hammurabi shit, where you are gonna get your lead foot cut off, but you are going to be penalized.

We've all decided to have better lives.

And for that you should be thankful.

[–]xxRage 0 points1 point ago

What happens if I ignore that ticket?

[–]MonacoE92 -1 points0 points ago

Everyone brakes the law, stop trying to convince yourself you don't. No one can follow the law 100% of the time.

[–]TemptationsPage 0 points1 point ago

This has very little to do with me, or what laws I break or do not break.

I would suggest that you stop making excuses for things you know are wrong.

[–]skeddles -3 points-2 points ago

Parking tickets are bullshit. You forget to put a dime in the meter and they charge to 150 times that.

[–]TemptationsPage 0 points1 point ago

Sounds like you are fully aware of the penalty, and the mechanism by which to avoid that penalty.

Pay attention. We all have better things to do than coddle to you.

[–]k33n -2 points-1 points ago

To speed, or to break the law in general, is an affront to that community.

How very utopian. Unfortunately you're ignoring the fact that the majority of people "speed", and that many areas are considered to be speed traps by the community.

[–]TemptationsPage 3 points4 points ago

Who exactly makes up the police force in this community that does not want them to their job?

It is really easy not to get a speeding ticket.

What you are doing is providing yourself an excuse to break the law, much like when a child says "Everyone else does it!"

I have no doubt that many people think like that, especially drivers. It does not change the fact that you putting yourself ahead of others. You believe, in your judgement, that you are right, and that even if you are wrong, it's not a big deal. Or that the penalty is too harsh.

You are wrong. It is not your judgment that counts. The law is written down, oh and posted. That you may think the penalty is too harsh is a legitimate complaint, but it does not mean you should not be penalized.

Also, no need to quote speed from me. if you are driving faster than the posted limit, it's called speeding, not my term.

[–]ch33sencrackers 2 points3 points ago

I'd agree with you whole-heartedly if it weren't for the fact that as citizens, we only get to face the consequences of speed limits that we had no say in devising. Honestly, 55mph on an interstate is unacceptably slow; moreover, these ridiculously slow limits, coupled with the fact that police depts have quotas, should make it painfully obvious that these laws are in place simply as a revenue source.

[–]TemptationsPage -2 points-1 points ago

Honestly, 55mph is on the interstate is not unacceptable. However, if you told me right now that they upped it to 75, I would not argue against it.

So I dont think the speed limits are ridiculously slow.

As for quota's and a revenue source, I'm sympathetic to the argument that they breed corruption in an organization, especially a police force, but it is not an excuse for breaking or ignoring a law.

It's not true that you has NO say in devising them, but it is true that no once contacted you for your specific opinion on it.

But that is a little bit of the nature of the beast, we can't get everyone's specific input on every ordinance, we elect people to do that. That they don't always make things the way you want them is a function of governing.

[–]MonacoE92 -1 points0 points ago

I think you need to read this sir: http://www.motorists.org/speed-limits/faq

[–]TemptationsPage 0 points1 point ago

Ok, you want me to read the FAQ from a think tank, who's mission is…

"We are not unlike you or most other people; we want to drive what we want to drive, go where we want to go and in the process not be unwitting cannon fodder for self-serving government programs, over-bearing police departments or greedy courts." ?

Certainly you agree this is a biased source.

[–]DontBanMeDaddy -2 points-1 points ago

Why is it a good thing? If you are driving legally then it doesn't matter if there are cops ahead.

[–]GrinningPariah 10 points11 points ago

Who the fuck drives legally?!

God I hate people like you. "If you aren't breaking the law you have nothing to worry about." Are you going to tell me you never just nudge a few MPH over the speed limit? That you always come to a complete stop at stop signs? You've never pulled a perfectly safe U-Turn where it probably wasn't allowed?

Everyone drives illegally.

[–]oomio10 1 point2 points ago

If youre drag racing or driving like an imbecile, you deserve the ticket. but I'm willing to bet 90% of speeding tickets are given to people who drive the average speed.

[–]oh_okay_ -3 points-2 points ago

Especially since you can reasonably assume if he's standing on a sidewalk he's in an area where there are going to be pedestrians. "Hey drunks, speed demons, texters! Take a detour and let your wakeup call be when you kill someone! Yayyyy, best friends!"

EDIT: TIL Redditors love traffic accidents.

[–]iwouldlikeawombat 1 point2 points ago

These comments are kinda unnerving, lets help each other break the law and put others' lives in jeopardy ._.

[–]Ztiller 0 points1 point ago

What is it with Americans and their undying love for signs?

[–]your_crazy_ex 0 points1 point ago

Im curious how you tell someone something when you cannot communicate verbally, only visually.

What exactly is the solution to not using a sign? Im eager to hear your ideas, oh wise one.

[–]iggys_reddit_account 1 point2 points ago

Text every single person that drives by, obviously. Speeding is more dangerous than texting.

[–]whatyouthink 0 points1 point ago

They use hand gestures in the absence of literacy. Like Italians!

[–]juloxx 1 point2 points ago

This guy is awesome

[–]the_lamentors_three 1 point2 points ago

really the cops should have people dress in plain clothes and do this. It slows people down, and if you set them up near schools and other high risk areas I'm certain you would see a drop in speed and accidents.

I guess it only works for as long as it takes the drivers to realise that most of them aren't warning you of anything, but the risk would still make driving slower worth it.

[–]polo421 1 point2 points ago

Be aware! In some states this is a criminal offense! Not that I'm saying not to do it, but be aware!

[–]Lurkerhereduh 1 point2 points ago

STOP RESISTING!

[–]bud299 1 point2 points ago

In England you get arrested for this! Or even flashing your lights to warn drivers coming the other way.

[–]MonacoE92 0 points1 point ago

Pretty sure the UK is the pinnacle of a police state.

[–]Knurt 0 points1 point ago

Praise the sun!

[–]MonacoE92 0 points1 point ago

Relevant

For those in the debate about speed limits, see above.

Really helps you see that most speed limits are not actually there for safety. Granted this doesn't mean you go 60 in a 35 residential zone, just that when you go the speed limit you are not the safest, it's when you are moving with the flow of traffic, and most of the time traffic goes at least 5-15 over depending where you are.

[–]drewmann333 0 points1 point ago

why not just putt thesis up next to speed limit signs.....

[–]TrandaBear 0 points1 point ago

LOL reminds me of this joke I really like.

So this cop settles into his speed trap for the afternoon. As a few hours go by, he notices he isn't catching anyone. Curious, he drives the stretch himself to see what could be warning the people. About a mile up the road he finds a "WARNING, SPEED TRAP AHEAD SIGN" and two miles down he finds a little boy holding a bucket full of money and a sign that reads "TIPS"

[–]andy1606 0 points1 point ago

In Galway Ireland two kids were arrested for the same thing, one of the kids were telling the drivers there was a police ahead checking for speed and the second kid was further on down the road with a sign saying " your welcome please leave tips" 3 weeks before they were caught :)

[–]theGreatGoodbye 1 point2 points ago

This is payback from him getting pulled over 10 minutes before.

[–]762headache -1 points0 points ago

I love my radar detector.

[–]lucastars 0 points1 point ago

Pft I don't slow down for cops.

[–]TechDesigner -1 points0 points ago

I usually flash my head lights if I passed a cop and see someone rushing in the on coming lane. Safety my ass. They take from our pockets to fill their own. Fuck that, get to sleep late, get to work on time, have enough money to eat at the end of the month.

[–]MTK67 0 points1 point ago

And on the other side of the speed trap, there's a guy with a bucket of cash and big cardboard sign reading 'TIPS APPRECIATED.'

[–]Defender 0 points1 point ago

[–]Gecko20 0 points1 point ago

Cop here. My agency does not have "ticket quotas", nor have I heard of any police agency that has quotas. I do speed enforcement to gain probable cause and find more serious criminal activity (guns, drugs, etc). As long as you aren't unpleasant to deal with and you weren't going twice the speed limit, verbal warning.

[–]MonacoE92 0 points1 point ago

I really don't like to sound like a bitter or angry person... but I hate people like you.

You break the law every time you get in your car to drive, if a cop wanted to he could ticket you every day multiple times each day. When you don't signal a full 100ft, when you don't stop at a stop sign all the way (or in some states for a full 3 seconds), when you don't signal each lane change, when you don't turn your lights on in a light rain, the list goes on.

People who think they obey the law 100% of the time are just kidding themselves. So please stop with the ignorant holier than thou crap, it gets old fast.

[–]SarcasticNarwhal 0 points1 point ago

I really admire the photoshop work that went into hiding the license plate. It is like it was never even there!

[–]2Dreality -1 points0 points ago

I love these people. Been saved twice by these good Samaritans warning me to slow down cause cops were up ahead. They don't give a fuk if your over just 5mph, they'll stop your ass if they need to fill their quota or having a bad day.

[–]kilmarta 1 point2 points ago

5 felons with with no insurance were saved that day

[–]zerodude123 -1 points0 points ago

This frustrates me. How do you know the cops aren't looking for a murder or a stolen car. Then great you gave them a heads up, great job he just got away and murdered 5 other people. So really let them do their job. Or lets have someone steal your stuff and let this happen

[–]jtjdt -1 points0 points ago

crtl+f Waze.

[–]UncleJesticle 0 points1 point ago

I appreciate that someone else understands that samaritan is not a synonym for GGG.

[–]ablebodiedmango -3 points-2 points ago

I think I remember a case being litigated about whether cops can stop or arrest people who warn other drivers about DUI checkpoints. I'm not 100% sure how it turned out but I believe the courts found that police were justified in preventing the warnings. Wankers.

EDIT: It's a freedom of speech issue. Has nothing to do with the validity of DUI checkpoints.

[–]CrazyBunnyLady 2 points3 points ago

DUI? Wait, so you think people should drink drunk? Because the only people who would have a good reason to avoid a DUI checkpoint is someone who thinks they will blow over the limit.

[–]polo421 2 points3 points ago

I drink drunk EVERY DAY lady! GET OFF MY BACK!

[–]CrazyBunnyLady 0 points1 point ago

This made me laugh so I won't edit my comment. :)

I DRINK DRUNK too! Let's start a club!!

[–]your_crazy_ex 1 point2 points ago

You can easily get arrested for a DUI at a checkpoint with any amount blown.

A DWI requires you fail a test/breathalyzer. A DUI requires a cop saying you were impaired; regardless of it's factual accuracy. If a cop doesn't like the way you look? He can nail you.

Avoiding cops is still a smart move for anyone not breaking the law.

[–]CrazyBunnyLady 0 points1 point ago

We appear to live in different countries.

[–]ablebodiedmango 1 point2 points ago

It's not the DUI checkpoint. It's about arresting people for warning other drivers about it. It's a freedom of speech issue. But please, go on another tangent. I'm sure it'll be enlightening.

[–]CrazyBunnyLady 0 points1 point ago

Your comment "I remember a case being litigated about whether cops can stop or arrest people who warn other drivers about DUI checkpoints" was what I was referring to. I was not trying to start another tangent.

[–]ablebodiedmango 0 points1 point ago

... That's exactly what I was referring to. The case was about whether police can arrest people for warning others about DUI checkpoints.

How is this so hard to understand?

[–]CrazyBunnyLady 0 points1 point ago

I thought you meant I was moving from the original issue of speeding. Sorry, I misunderstood you. Still in my country, Canada, there is a law against warning people about these types of things. It is not a freedom of speech issue, it is a interfering with police issue. I didn't make the laws, but in the case of a DUI checkpoint I do agree with them.

[–]deadfire55 -5 points-4 points ago

He probably got caught by the cop... either way I like this guy.

[–]Gasonfires 0 points1 point ago

Before the legislature set speed limits by statute in my state, my city admitted the way they did it was to check the average speed on a road for a week or so, subtract 10mph from it, round that to the nearest multiple of 5 and then post that as the speed limit.

You want to be hated/honked at/rammed around here, just try going the speed limit in the fast lane. We have people who go 3-4 under and drive merrily along convinced they are "doing it right."

[–]your_crazy_ex -1 points0 points ago

It's not the "fast lane" it's the passing lane.

If you're driving slower than some traffic in the left lane but are still passing then it's irrelevant how fast you're going.

[–]states_le_obvious 1 point2 points ago

But you better get the hell out of the way for someone going faster than you, even if it's temporarily. I bet you're the kind of person who mostly drives in the left lane on a 5 lane highway because you're mostly "passing someone," and have little arguments in your head against people who might call you out.

[–]IonAnubis 0 points1 point ago

My Dad's buddies did this back in college, they got arrested for obstruction of justice. My dad had to bail them out. I loved that drunken story my dad told me, it was funnier cause i was drunk too. Awww Paris.