this post was submitted on
798 points (76% like it)
1,148 up votes 350 down votes

lgbt

unsubscribe52,507 readers

~95 users here now

Want Flair?

This subreddit is by and for people who are Gender and Sexual Minorities (GSM), including but by no means limited to LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) people, and respect for our diversity and experiences is paramount. All are welcome to participate who agree to follow the rules outlined below and in:

The r/lgbt FAQ


IRC Chat: irc.synirc.net #rlgbt - info and rules


Rules

  • Rule 1: No homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, racism, serophobia, or misogyny. If you are unclear about what may constitute any of the above, please see the LGBT FAQ. If you are using triggering language in an educational or demonstrative capacity, we ask that you please wrap it in a trigger warning, e.g. [problematic language](/trigger). If you are submitting a post that contains hateful remarks or triggering language, please precede your post's title with [TW]. For example: "[TW] Title of Post"

  • Rule 2: Demonstrate a willingness to learn. This is a safe space. Anyone can make a mistake and accidentally say something hurtful or triggering. If you find yourself corrected for making this error, please try to learn from it. This is not a place to tell people that they need to reclaim a pejorative so you can use it, that they should laugh at jokes about them, or that they otherwise just "shouldn't be so sensitive." For lightly moderated LGBT-related discussion, we recommend /r/ainbow. /r/ainbow does not moderate discussion, but the community will expect that you treat them with respect. For more information, see /r/ainbow's FAQ.

  • Rule 3: Meta discussion will be directed to /r/LGBTOpenModmail. The mods check it frequently and will take suggestions into consideration.

  • Rule 4: Threads that seem to have been taken over by off-topic and/or excessively inflammatory discussion due to linking from other subreddits (Including but not limited to ShitRedditSays, SubredditDrama, and MensRights) will be deleted so they do not appear on r/lgbt's front page. They will still be accessible from outside links. Deleted threads may be unmoderated, so keep this in mind. They are officially disowned and you are on your own if you participate in them.


Crisis Line Directory

Transgender 101

A warning about "researchers" on reddit


Related Subreddits

QUILTBAG Specific:

Political or Educational:

Geographical or Cultural Specific:

Having problems? Need a place to stay?

Fun or Relaxing:

  1. > Picture Thread! <
  2. Launching r/AskGSM!
  3. Regarding Mormonism
a community for
message the moderators

MODERATORS

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 131 comments

[–]classyrobot 34 points35 points ago

I get where this argument is coming from, but it's not one I've ever particularly liked. It almost implies that straight women are incapable of being homophobic, which clearly isn't the case.

[–]yourdadsbffgaysha gown 20 points21 points ago

I'm meh about it because it didn't really seem to address the homophobia that sparked this whole conversation in the first place. I mean, the girl makes a valid point, but considering this was submitted to r/lgbt, I wasn't expecting this to become a lesson in heterosexual dating/interaction. The way it's written, I think it'd be more appropriate in, say, /r/TwoXChromosomes.

[–]chuddlewinks 2 points3 points ago

This is definitely more of a feminist discussion, but the OP just didn't know quite where to put it.

[–]elastic-craptastic 2 points3 points ago

but the OP just didn't know quite where to put it.

Must resist urge to make a joke out of that... :)

[–]Offensive_Statement 4 points5 points ago

Also implies that all woman are dumb enough to buy into a statistically invalid model for rape, and bigoted enough to fall into the "all men are rapists" fallacy, which ironically enough is a perspective that actually validates rape culture, rather than protecting women. By treating rape as a force rather than an action performed by a person you open yourself up to all sorts of victim blaming.

[–]CheeseyxPansexual Genderqueer/Cactus 170 points171 points ago

That's homophobia for you. The fear that gay men are going to treat you the way you treat women.

[–]AmaraeIntrospection, Contemplation, Curiosity, Spirituality 48 points49 points ago

I have the most profound understanding of non-religious homophobia now.

[–]geaw 26 points27 points ago

It is my belief that "religious homophobia" is just a facade for this. It's an excuse for this kind of hypocrisy. The root of homophobia is misogynist power structures and mental models. Nobody had the sequence, "OK with homosexuals -> read the Bible -> not OK with homosexuals." People read a holy text in order to be excused from thinking critically, not to have their mind changed.

[–]UlyssaNevadaOwen 12 points13 points ago

Objection! (sorry, PW5 hype)

I actually lost a friend that way. He never had a single problem with homosexuals before, and knew I was a lesbian for years. Probably the coolest, funniest guy I knew. He also wasn't religious at all, neither were his parents. One day, he mentions he's looking into being a Christian, and over the next few months he talks to me and other friends in the group less and less. After about seven months of this, I confront him about it. He starts to ignore my existence IRL, blocks me off Skype, Steam, everything. I can't even message the guy, and if I do, I get no response. A year or so after, it takes a written message passed through a friend(who happened to be his classmate) to get a reason as to why he did what he did without explanation.

"You are a bad example for me as a Christian. You're a good person, and everyone knows that, but until you stop your disgusting sins, (read:homosexual behavior) I should not be in your company, nor should I be in the company of fag enablers. Let me know when you stop being such a bad sinner, then we can talk."

Responded with, "When you realize how shitty a person you became, and how you dropped your real friends to pick up a fake one, then we can talk."

Well, it's just one person. But I doubt he's the only one. Mind you, he's still okay with watching lesbian porn, totally fine with that(based on a discussion overheard by that same classmate).

[–]AmaraeIntrospection, Contemplation, Curiosity, Spirituality 11 points12 points ago

No one has that sequence because they are bred into Bible love. They are raised like that therefore do not have the first phase of the sequence. I really believe that there are a lot of people who dislike homosexuality because of religion with no other variables.

[–]SashimiXFree Yourself From Mental Slavery 1 point2 points ago

True, but the reason religion is against it is because it goes against the power structure and mental models.

[–]Greanbeens 2 points3 points ago

Nobody had the sequence, "OK with homosexuals -> read the Bible -> not OK with homosexuals.

Didn't many traditional tribal societies do exactly that when they encountered missionaries?

[–]Frothyleet 0 points1 point ago

I don't know if that's always true. But for the most part you are correct. Religion doesn't usually beget hate so much as it justifies it. Dislike gay people? Bible told you to! Not comfortable with women being able to control their bodies (and thus dictate the course of their lives)? Bible says it's murder! Like the institution of slavery and hate miscegenation? Bible's got your back!

[–]MakeThemWatch 1 point2 points ago

cheesyeyx's comment was witty and all but I really can't imagine this being the basis for anyone's homophobia religious or otherwise.

[–]AmaraeIntrospection, Contemplation, Curiosity, Spirituality 1 point2 points ago

Well if nothing else I think it's certainly applicable to some people.

[–]sharlos 1 point2 points ago

Why not?

Femininity is a negative trait to have > Letting a guy fuck you is feminine > Getting fucked by a guy is bad.

[–]DeliriousZeus 7 points8 points ago

I quoted you on facebook, man/woman/cactus.

[–]apollo888 0 points1 point ago

Something can feel gross without being a fear of being raped.

[–]triq616 0 points1 point ago

As a straight guy, I would be flattered if a gay guy hits on me. :3

[–]mibeosaur 19 points20 points ago

So homophobes are only afraid of homosexuals who are bigger and stronger than they are?

I also like this part:

Every man ... is either a harmless stranger or a potential rapist

Well, yes. Usually the harmless stranger though. In fact, overwhelmingly so. And because gay men are a subset of all men, the homophobe's fear is just as rational as the woman's!

[–]thatget 20 points21 points ago

I've never thought of it that way. You think that's really common a part of why some men are homophobic? Or maybe just an outlier.

[–]StormTAG 15 points16 points ago

Most homophobes have not had a homosexual make a pass at them so I doubt it is a common thing. The possibility of getting hit on maybe though.

[–]thatget 2 points3 points ago

Lol. Yessss. My cousin would always bitch about the possibility of damn queerosexuals hitting on him. So tempted to tell him gay doesn't mean bad taste dude, you don't have to worry.

[–]penguinofhonor 0 points1 point ago

They might not have been hit on, but the idea of it is enraging to a lot of them. There have been a ton of times where I've heard "I'm fine with gays, but if one of them hits on me I'm going to punch him."

[–]caikoran 12 points13 points ago

I think most homophobic people don't fully understand their own fears. I am very pro equality for all and bisexual myself, so I talk with a lot of people about homophobia and such. There are so many men I speak with who are okay with the concept of a man being gay, but doesn't want to see it, and god forbid a man ever hit on them! In some ways, the context of these conversations may imply that they're afraid of their masculinity being questioned (which could go either way — feel like a woman approached and vulnerable to the male and/or that others might think they are gay), but I also sometimes get the feeling it's some kind of physical discomfort that they can't put their finger on themselves. This has always implied to me a similar fear as the one the OP posed.

[–]CLeaderwoo 1 point2 points ago

This.

I've had conversations with numerous guys prior to coming out, and really asked them why homosexuality is such an issue. These aren't hard-hitting facts, but most of the answers would just either be 'because I don't want to get hit on by one of them, or see them making out in public.'

It's really interesting, and has always been intriguing to me why their answer was that, perhaps it's their masculinity being questioned, but this was during high school and for the most part during gym class they would go smacking each other's rear-ends and making passes at each other at jokes - so I don't see their masculinity being the best option. Perhaps instead of their masculinity, because they believe it's wrong.. they are scared that they themselves might be gay, and don't want to even go down that road?

Either way, the OP from the actual post makes a valid point at the discomfort and paranoia.

[–]thatget 1 point2 points ago

Yeah, I was talking to my boyfriend about this...I'm bi so this is all abstract to him. While he logically doesn't think it's wrong he's in the same boat with the "just not towards me" kind of deal. When I framed it just like a chick he's not attracted to hitting on him you could SEE the light bulb, it was hilarious.

[–]veganbisexualatheist 2 points3 points ago

So now tell me, why is everyone treating this epiphany like such a gotcha moment? As if we have scored a point against homophobes in some way? A man has every right to avoid and shy away from unwanted sexual attention, the same way a woman does. It doesn't matter is he is homo phobic or not - people are entitled to their sexual and societal boundaries.

[–]thatget 0 points1 point ago

Oh yeah, totally. I'm with you on that. We also had a discussion on rape where the victim is male. But there's a huge difference between someone making a pass when they don't know if you'll appreciate it and being someone's nightmare creeper.

[–]bloodfyr 2 points3 points ago

I don't think it's as common as some people make it out to be, nor do I think the idea that all homophobes are secretly homosexual is as common either.

I think there's also a degree of genuine disgust in there too. A friend of mine expressed the fact that he was homophobic in his thoughts one time while we were drunk because he didn't know how "gay guys did it through all the shit" and he was repulsed by it. He just didn't know. I explained the details of how it actually worked and he apologized and all that.

tl;dr - There are a ton of reasons, each probably no more prevalent than any of the others.

[–]thatget 0 points1 point ago

Makes you really wonder doesn't it. Yay for spreading truth though!

[–]Alphaiv 0 points1 point ago

To be honest this story sounds about as real as the atheist college professor who challenges god to stop the piece of chalk breaking when he drops it, I wouldn't really dwell on it if I were you. "Witty feminist protagonist thoroughly schools ignorant homophobes and makes them see the world in a new light" come on.

[–]thatget 0 points1 point ago

Meh. I've seen a good chunk of homophobes that I don't see falling into the "too deep in the closet" category. It just makes me wonder how they get that way.

[–]lizardom 2 points3 points ago

This actually makes a lot of sense. It's amazing how things can be put into perspective with just a few words.

I remember the first time I had another man take a pass at me. I worked at a bar doing busboy work when I was 15. A couple of men were overly complementing my eyes but I didn't really think of it. I was naive and sheltered enough that I didn't even know gay was a thing. It wasn't until a couple of the waitresses told me what they were that it all hit me. I was confused at first, then realized how nice it felt to get a compliment on my looks - no girls ever did that sort of thing.

never gave it much of a thought until several years later when I had that WTF epiphany. They were in their mid 30's flirting with a 15 year old, lol...

[–]WokeUpOlder 22 points23 points ago

Post this on /r/MensRights

[–]coldvault 9 points10 points ago

Yeah...when I saw some iteration of this story there, they weren't too happy about it.

[–]jesternormalunikidit's whatever 36 points37 points ago

because it's the assumption that all males are rapists. Its sexist, straight up.

[–]PoultryBingo 16 points17 points ago

No no no, it is not saying that. The point is that most woman HAVE to live with this fear of being raped, but being raped/sexually assaulted isn't something most men tend to worry about. The fear is always there in women, not because women think all men are rapists, but because SOME men are rapists and since most women can be easily physically overpowered they must treat all men at certain times with caution. Women must have their guard up at almost all times unfortunately. Because if they don't guess what happens? Sometimes they get raped and then sometimes people say to the victim "well why weren't you more careful? Why did you do x, y, z, things that made you [allegedly] vulnerable?". Rapists/sexual assailants can be anybody. A spouse, partner, stranger, family member; therefore those more vulnerable to sexual assault cannot know who to really trust.

[–]Inksplotter 14 points15 points ago

I think it's more an evaluation of plausibility. If you are an average size/strength man, there is a limited segment of the population that can physically overpower you. (Yes, weapons make this mute to some extent.) If you are an average size/strength woman, most of the human population (primarily male) can physically overpower you.

Also, other than in monosexual situations (like prison) women are more often the objects of 'stranger' sexual assault. (Women do sexually assault men, no argument there. But domestic or 'power dynamic (ie teacher) assault is more common) So yes, a stranger in the parking garage is a different experience for a woman than for a man.

[–]ThePantsParty 3 points4 points ago

there is a limited segment of the population that can physically overpower you. (Yes, weapons make this mute to some extent.)

No, it makes it moot to a full extent. Guns exist, therefore every single person is an equally potential threat to every single other person. A woman walking toward you in a parking garage is a potential gun-wielding maniac just like a guy is, so there is absolutely no difference.

[–]Thermodynamo 4 points5 points ago

Considering violent crime and gun ownership statistics in relation to gender, this claim is really not reflective of the reality we live in.

[–]ThePantsParty 8 points9 points ago

The word being used is "potential". This basically means "capable of". All women are as capable of being a gun-wielding maniac as men are. The parent comment said that there is a limited portion of the population that can overpower you, so I responded pointing out that this is not true. Pointing out that some demographics actually do more crime is in no way relevant to a comment about what demographics are capable of committing the crime, as the parent comment argued. (as you can see in the quote I provided to make explicit what I was responding to)

[–]Thermodynamo -4 points-3 points ago

Oooookay so you made a pretty pointless, technical argument with no bearing on lived experience then...thanks for clarifying, apologies that I assumed you were making a relevant comment.

If you read my comment above, you'll note that I never said that your comment wasn't technically true in a very on-paper-only sense, I just said that it doesn't reflect our actual reality.

[–]beliefsarerelativecuddlebro 1 point2 points ago

I don't think it makes it moot to a full extent. Not every would-be attacker carries a gun. If a woman is confronted by an unarmed assailant, she is more likely to still be physically overpowered by them than a man. So of course, any situation where the assailant is wielding a gun is an equal threat, regardless of gender. A belligerent drunken frat boy is not likely to carry a gun, but he's still frightening to a woman, or any person with a significantly smaller size/stature.

[–]tieranosaur 0 points1 point ago

For me, I think that it's not just that I've learned that strange, unknown men could be a potential rapist, which is less likely, but that every unknown man is a highly likely source of mild - moderate sexual harassment. Starting from inappropriate looks and noises, all the way to non-violent unwanted contact and attempts at coercing me into giving them what they want. Whistles, comments, lecherous glances, all of it, it all comes from unknown men and while it's not rape, that doesn't mean it has no effect.

[–]Hermocrates 4 points5 points ago

No, it's the assumption that many more women than men will be raped, and that there are enough men who are rapists that women can't just take men at face value.

Both of which are correct.

[–]Theageofplague 1 point2 points ago

Which is a false assumption. Men are raped more often than women. It's just funny when it happens to men. Or does prison rape not count to you?

[–]Envark 2 points3 points ago

Prison rape isn't a worry to men outside of prison.

[–]veganbisexualatheist 0 points1 point ago

It very much is depending on your socioeconomic class and/or race. Dismissing the effects of prison socialization on wider society is a peculiarly privileged position to take in a social justice forum...

[–]Hermocrates 1 point2 points ago

Prison is obviously an extenuating circumstance, and as such I didn't include that in my examples; the fact is, what prisoners do in prison won't affect public perceptions of non-prisoners outside of prisons. Outside of prison, the majority of rapes are of women, flat-out. And including prison rapes, you still end up with the vast majority of rapists being men.

[–]coldvault -1 points0 points ago

Plus, it's bullshit and probably fake to some extent.

[–]kayura77 10 points11 points ago

This is something I've been trying to put into words for a long time. This is a great point.

[–]soapwater 27 points28 points ago

Not everything has to do with your vagina. After all, plenty of straight women are homophobic.

[–]ManicPixieFuckUp 2 points3 points ago

Eh... most homophobic women I know are fine with dudes but homophobic towards other women. Again, they usually reference the threat of getting hit on, ostensibly by people they're not prepared for.

Also, there's no reason to call this story vagina-centric when it's clearly just saying that feeling preyed-upon is shitty. The possession of a vagina just gives you a perspective on the social dynamics of hitting/getting hit on and preying/getting preyed upon that being straight and possessing a cock doesn't inform you of.

[–]Thermodynamo -1 points0 points ago

Ugh, but seriously, this is how it sounds to women when we hear guys complain about how unacceptable it is to imagine being hit on by men. Cry me a river, bros.

Doesn't mean that there aren't ALL SORTS of reasons people have for being homophobic, women included, the only claim here is that this perspective is worth consideration, and I believe it is whether or not other people have other reasons for being homophobic.

In short, no one said everything has to do with anyone's vagina; all they said is that certain things become a lot clearer if you can put yourself in someone else's shoes.

[–]karmas_a_bitch_010 18 points19 points ago

It's sadly hilarious to me this got so few upvotes and comments; it's exactly what's happening. Male homophobes are often homophobes because they don't want to be seen and/or treated the way they see and/or treat women. If not that it's the old internalized variety and they're afraid of their own attraction to male sexuality.

[–]veganbisexualatheist 0 points1 point ago

Male homophobes are often homophobes because they don't want to be seen and/or treated the way they see and/or treat women.

How is this surprising though? People take on relationship roles all the time, and if people don't treat them the way they expect to be treated in those roles - then they get uncomfortable. I mean ask any trans* person how it feels like to be misgendered, or to have the wrong gender make a pass at you repeatedly. Or hell ask me about how it feels to be treated as if you are just a closeted homosexual despite your assertions to the contrary.

You can debate about the validity and the moral implications of those societal roles, but the very fact that they exist and that people want to belong in one of their choice doesn't seem to be very shocking news to me...

[–]Qk_Gee 8 points9 points ago

To be honest, I don't think that the two are quite equivalent. I am a straight male, other men have made passes at me and I denied them as I am not interested in a homosexual relationship. I can see how people may think that a man flirting with a man is the same as a man flirting with a woman.

Not too confident that I can word this correctly, but here goes...

The straight male being hit on by the gay male isn't just "not interested" in gay sex, they most likely can't even fathom having it. I don't mean this as any disrespect, but I think that gay sex between males is seen in the same light to everyday people as certain fetishes (note, I'm not trying to equivocate them with fetishes, just that they're seen similarly by the average person). Take a foot fetish for example, if you don't have one, you probably think that it's pretty unappealing. The same goes for the straight male being propositioned for sex by another man.

Women, on the other hand, are propositioned for sex by the same sex they're attracted to. They may be unwanted sexual advances, but straight women are sexually attracted to that gender.

I mean this as no disrespect to anyone, just that I don't think the post was very accurate in what it was trying to say.

[–]Fistocracy 1 point2 points ago

Well thank fuck someone was here to mansplain it. For a moment some of us folks in r/lgbt/ were worried that their experiences and worldview might be valid :)

[–]ExceptionToTheRuleTrans Tomboy -3 points-2 points ago

Let me guess, you're a guy right?

How about if the girl is a lesbian, or not attracted to the guy, or dating someone else, or asexual or whatever. How about unwanted advances are freaking creepy.

[–]linggayby 13 points14 points ago

I am a straight male

Let me guess, you're a guy right?

"Let me start by making a snide remark about your gender privilege, when you have already acknowledged it."

He did make the point, afterwards, that straight women are sexually attracted to that gender.

Unwanted sexual advances are unwanted, yes. But there's no way for the person making the advances to know if they are or are not wanted. Very few people are going to make a fool of themselves if they know that nothing will come of it, regardless of gender.

[–]ExceptionToTheRuleTrans Tomboy -2 points-1 points ago

"Let me start by making a snide remark about your gender privilege, when you have already acknowledged it."

I actually didn't see that.

[–]motdidr 3 points4 points ago

Then you didn't read his post. It was the second sentence.

[–]ThePantsParty 9 points10 points ago

I am a straight male

Let me guess, you're a guy right?

Quite a prognosticator there...

[–]ExceptionToTheRuleTrans Tomboy -2 points-1 points ago

I actually didn't see that.

[–]Qk_Gee 3 points4 points ago

I am a guy, correct, and you have a good point. I hadn't even considered that, however, why is it creepy if she's any of those things? Unless the guy is overly pushy about it, I'm not sure why trying to get a date, hitting on a lesbian or just being unattractive yet still wanting to go on a date, etc. is "creepy". The other party isn't always aware that their advances are unwanted, so they can't be held accountable under normal circumstances.

[–]ExceptionToTheRuleTrans Tomboy -1 points0 points ago

Its the idea that phyiscally, if a guy wants to have sex with me as a girl, barring me having a weapon, I can't actually stop him. That makes me very careful when I'm alone and theres a guy near me, I worry because I'm vulnerable.

[–]Qk_Gee 2 points3 points ago

True, although I would hope that you didn't assume all guys were all hostile and act on that. I can see the advantage of being careful but that doesn't necessarily say anything about the advances themselves being creepy, that's more of a situational thing I think, with the setting, other people and other factors playing a part.

[–]ExceptionToTheRuleTrans Tomboy -1 points0 points ago

No, I don't sprint away from every dude I see, I just try to make sure that i'm safe.

Heres my train of thought. If you're making a sexual advance, and espessically if you're drunk or high or something of that sort, you are already fufilling one of the two conditions that lead to me being raped, the 2nd would be not liking it when I reject you, and thats scary, it makes me have to be very careful when I reject you and where I do it, because the wrong person and the wrong place, I could die. So yeah, I have to be careful.

[–]Qk_Gee 2 points3 points ago

I don't see the harm in any of this (your precautions). Your wording made it seem that if anyone that you don't find attractive hits on you, they're automatically creepy.

[–]Thermodynamo -2 points-1 points ago

Women, on the other hand, are propositioned for sex by the same sex they're attracted to. They may be unwanted sexual advances, but straight women are sexually attracted to that gender.

You do not get it. My ownership of a vagina does not mean I am at all interested in dealing with unwelcome advances.

[–]Qk_Gee 6 points7 points ago

I understand that actually, by definition no one wants "unwelcome advances", that's the reason they're unwelcome. My point is, the person hitting on you doesn't know that you are completely uninterested from the outset. This means that you can't hold it against them for trying. Only once you've let them know that you aren't interested and they keep pursuing you can you berate them.

[–]Flightless_Kiwi 1 point2 points ago

Neither does the gay male in this hypothetical. They can't be sure you're straight.

[–]Qk_Gee 2 points3 points ago

I understand that and I'm not defending the actions of the straight male in the hypothetical.

[–]Thermodynamo 0 points1 point ago

Of course--I don't hold it against random but polite hopefuls, that's actually flattering and not something I'd put in the category of "unwelcome advances", not because there's any chance I'll say yes, but because I don't mind as long as people are reasonable about it.

When I think of "unwelcome advances" I'm thinking people who are persistent or who would hit on you while you're cornered in a cab with no chance of removing yourself from the situation. It's selfish, inconsiderate and certainly unwelcome.

And in no uncertain terms--no matter what, "but women are attracted to men" should not be part of the conversation. It smacks too much of "but surely women must enjoy rape sometimes a little right? Because they LIKE having sex with men." That's how date rape happens...one party decides there's just NO WAY the other party really isn't interested. Woman, man, that's all you need, right?

It's just such a distortion of what's relevant. Making excuses for people who don't respect women's boundaries because women are statistically likely to be straight is ridiculous...just because women have been interested in certain men in their lives doesn't mean they'll be interested in the person hitting on them at random, and it's just as important as it is with anyone to be sensitive to the context and respectful of people's boundaries, and cognizant of the signals people are sending, especially when you don't know them.

[–]Qk_Gee 0 points1 point ago

When I think of "unwelcome advances" I'm thinking people who are persistent or who would hit on you while you're cornered in a cab with no chance of removing yourself from the situation.

This is where I think we argue past each other in a sense. I was thinking of unwelcome advances to mean that you were in a state of mind where any advances were unwelcome, now that this is clarified, we can move on.

And in no uncertain terms--no matter what, "but women are attracted to men" should not be part of the conversation. It smacks too much of "but surely women must enjoy rape sometimes a little right? Because they LIKE having sex with men." That's how date rape happens...one party decides there's just NO WAY the other party really isn't interested. Woman, man, that's all you need, right?

I think the fact that, in general, women are attracted to men is important in this case but I realize that not all women are attracted to all men at any point in time. This is just as important. I don't agree with:

"but surely women must enjoy rape sometimes a little right? Because they LIKE having sex with men."

whatsoever. People like having sex with certain other people some of the time. That being said I'm not so sure that the jump from "Women are attracted to men" to "Because women are attracted to men therefore they must enjoy rape a little" needed to be made.

And I don't think I'm making excuses for people that don't respect other's boundaries. Our different interpretations of "unwelcome advances" is probably what made you think that.

[–]Thankful_Lez 1 point2 points ago

And then there are the lucky few of us who get homophobia and sexism. We're called lesbians.

[–]mynamestopher 0 points1 point ago

I mostly feel awkward around girls I don't know and a lot that I do know...no rapist here

[–]62tele 2 points3 points ago

Maybe for some but hardly a definitive answer. As a recovered homophobe, I grew up in an environment where that was the norm, I can say this was in no way true for me or my friends. The idea of gay sex seemed gross, dirty, etc... when compared to sex with a woman -- not because I wouldn't have the power. The idea of being attracted to another man, when my biology was pretty clearly telling me that women were the fairer sex, seemed weird and gross. The influences around me were pretty clear that being gay was abnormal, immoral, biblically wrong, etc...

Luckily I grew up, thought for myself, was "rescued" by atheism and made friends who I later found out were gay and I learned to stop seeing things the way I did. Not everyone gets that opportunity.

Oh, and with the biases gone being approached by a gay man can be quite flattering.

[–]NarutoRendan 2 points3 points ago

sounds like rape-a-phobia. no offense, but there's a line for fearing rape, and perpetual fear is not normal.

[–]JennaIsMe 3 points4 points ago

There's a good point buried beneath all that exaggeration.

[–]kayura77 5 points6 points ago

I wouldn't be surprised if this happened as stated. Truth = stranger than fiction.

But you're right, the point is a bit buried in the giant wall o' text.

[–]JennaIsMe -1 points0 points ago

I was thinking more about 'We're constantly scared' and all that. Tone that down and make it "We usually have to think about things like that more often".

[–]nbarnacle -3 points-2 points ago

Your privilege is showing.

[–]JennaIsMe 1 point2 points ago

What privileges?

[–]aloneparoo 2 points3 points ago

Yes, because EVERY MAN EVER is a potential rapist. Obviously.

[–]thatget -1 points0 points ago

So very much not the point. Just enough men are serial rapists that shit gets scary sometimes.

[–]laivindil 0 points1 point ago

I think its deeper then that. I think people tend to think of the worst things, so even if its not on a sexual level, you think that stranger may be dangerous on some other violent/dangerous level. And you fear for your safety. There is certainly a differences in peoples perceptions of danger, and what is dangerous, but I think it is a typical human reaction to let the "worst possible case" fly through their mind when evaluating a situation. And being in a strange place with a stranger (like a taxi), the likelihood of that happening is 99%.

(not trying to invalidate this, just saying I think there is more to the reaction, and its more common/human instinct then this image portrays)

edit: read it again. Where there is a perceived pass, vs an actual assault or overstepping of bounds. Since we don't know what actually happened.

[–]shadow_link08 1 point2 points ago

I agree with the post, but it's kind of perpetuating rather than contradicting the fact that every gay man is a rapist.

Also, genuine question: do girls really suspect every guy of being a potential rapist? Do you really fear the possibility of rape that frequently? I've never thought about it like that, and none of my female friends have expressed it to me, so I'm genuinely curious.

[–]thatget 1 point2 points ago

This. Absolutely none of it surprises me.

[–]telperiontree 0 points1 point ago

Not explicitly. Maybe if you are getting catcalls in a bad neighborhood at night and you have no backup that occurs to you, but usually you're just worried that they'll take it too far and not respect your boundaries. when people objectify you, you have to worry that they'll treat you like an...object. They'll grab your ass in a subway station, or stick their hand down your pants in a nightclub, because people are fucking idiots.

So, sort of? A less exaggerated version, anyway. I assume that someone will stop if I tell them to stop, but I really don't want to get to that point in the first place.

We're more worried about something like this.

Y'know, except backwards. And without the part where she leaves without someone complaining.

[–]beliefsarerelativecuddlebro 1 point2 points ago

I don't, at least. If I'm in a public place, and a normal-seeming guy makes a non-aggressive pass at me, I don't think anything of it. If I'm with a guy friend I don't worry that he's secretly a psycho rapist.

But as I'm a physically small person, and female, when I'm alone, in a not-so-nice place, I feel more vulnerable than I imagine most men do. Because I know that if that stranger walking past me decided to grab me, I probably couldn't get away.

So it's not that I see most guys as a threat, it's more that if I'm in a situation where a potential threat could arise, I doubt I can rely on my own physical strength to escape.

And that threat, to me, seems more likely than say, getting held up at gunpoint or having my plane hijacked. I have quite a few friends who have been sexually assaulted. It feels like it's all around me. So yeah, that probably makes me more guarded than a guy might be.

[–]channelfive 0 points1 point ago

As a women who lives alone and has had her house broken into while there, yes. It's a constant fear in the back of my mind. But previous life experiences might make me biased here. If no guy had ever been forceful with me I might not be so worried. I'll wait to leave work with a coworker and I triple check all my door locks before I go to sleep.

[–]bloinggloing 2 points3 points ago

Maybe this has something to do with it, but I really think that some people are simply hateful.

[–]o00oo00oo00o 0 points1 point ago

Good concept and I understand the importance of the idea... but the analogy is forced. Getting groped or aggressively hit on in a space that you can't just walk away from (like a taxi) is not a good "teaching moment" to talk to young people about general sexual relations.

The line that was over the top was about "the next time you hit on someone". They were making a good point up until that moment... about how people (mostly women) have to be on high alert regarding (mostly men) in private or desolate spaces but then the OP's quote dives into an unhealthy place regarding any sexual advances and that is just wrong.

The conversation should have been about... at that point... feeling unsafe in certain environments and why... and not about "hitting on people". It's a minor point but I don't think young people should be taught that hitting on people could be similar to rape.

[–]blackjackjester 1 point2 points ago

Unfortunately, the way society currently works means that if a man (in a hetero relationship) does not approach a woman, or more often that not initiates conversation, then that man will rarely date. The difference between an 'unwanted advance' and 'welcome assertiveness' is not known until after the fact. On one hand, the guy is a creep. On the other, he is alpha and attractive, but we don't know until after.

There is also no reassuring way to walk between 10-30 feet behind someone else at night. It kinda sucks for both people.

[–]thatget 0 points1 point ago

This made me absurdly sad. It can be done but you're right there is not a lot of middle ground.

[–]telperiontree -1 points0 points ago

Easy way to not be a creep: know the girl before you ask her out. Friends first. Don't ask someone out solely because they are hot.

You are right on the second one. Though it sucks less for the follower, as they know they aren't being stalked.

[–]blackjackjester 0 points1 point ago

Maybe it's just me, but no female friendship I've ever had became a relationship. It's always a friend-of-friend or same-class. Now that I'm graduated though, and work in a mostly male dominated field (Software ftw), I meet few females through connections - so random people is my main goto. It only work once in a great while, but occasionally is better than never :P

[–]retitled 1 point2 points ago

Could be or they honestly could find gay sex disgusting which is their personal opinion. I don't believe anyone should take it personally or offensively. There are plenty of homosexual people out there that feel the straight sex is disgusting.

[–]bohemianmichfestie -1 points0 points ago

Absolutely brilliant. A quality example of perspective reversal. I wish it were this easy to get this point across every time.

[–]elite_303 0 points1 point ago

I have taught my children to be aware and prepared. I didn't instill in them a fear that every member of the opposite sex has a 50\50 chance of raping them. let us not forget that anyone can be a rapist. Dolphins will if you give them the opportunity. Do you warn young girls about the dangers of dolphin rape?

[–]cheesiestcheese 0 points1 point ago

Because its an old repost and a pretty simple way of looking at things.

[–]veganbisexualatheist 0 points1 point ago

I mean assuming for a second that this actually happened and isn't typical Facebook esprit d'escalier, is no one else put off by how unforgivably snide this person is to some who ostensibly just admitted to being propositioned against his will? Social Justice is not about using the misery of your opponents to shove ideology into their faces. There is a time and a place for explaining gender dynamics and the risk of victimisation faced by minority groups - and that time is most certainly not right after someone spilled their guts to you about a scary situation in their lives.

To paraphrase my favourite character from the West Wing (Leo :3) "Now, we have standards for justice, and they are difficult and they have to be enforced and it's right that they are enforced. But we do not strut ever."

[–]massaikosis 0 points1 point ago

some men dont really give a shit if they get hit on. I just take the compliment and say im not interested, zero fucks. and you could make the case that other men could use force for any reason, not just sexually. I dont worry that every other guy is gona take my wallet. so much assuming here. lighten up

[–]JediMasterSam 0 points1 point ago

I get asked sometimes whether I care that my roommate is gay and I'm not. I always reply that I'm the farthest thing that a gay Guy wants. Even further off than a woman.

[–]sawyeh 0 points1 point ago

Post this in r/feminism !

[–]X-Reddit 0 points1 point ago

Schrodinger's Rapist

[–]StraightTrippin 0 points1 point ago

women REALLY worry about being raped by EVERY guy they see in public? if im in the room with a homosexual, i dont automatically assume he wants to sex me... sorry thats just what i understood after reading this

[–]Killhouse -5 points-4 points ago

Yes, treating all men as potential rapists is true gender equality, you stuck up bitch.

[–]ExceptionToTheRuleTrans Tomboy -5 points-4 points ago

All men ARE potential rapists.

[–]HMacyFan4eva 6 points7 points ago

So are all women, and all gay people

[–]JesusLizardLizard 0 points1 point ago

The difference is that men don't usually have to worry about being over powered by most women, while women can usually be over powered by most men. That's simply because of testosterone's effects on muscles. Of course, that's to say nothing about men raping men or women raping women. All people are potential rapists, it's true. I'm cautious around anyone I perceive as a threat, man or woman, and I can't blame anyone else for doing the same.

[–]Prikolni 4 points5 points ago

All people are potential rapists.

FTFY

[–]ThePantsParty 4 points5 points ago

And all women are potential hatchet-wielding maniacs. Shall we make a post about that too?

[–]KierantheUnimpressiv -3 points-2 points ago

I believe their point was that everyone is a potential rapist, it's hard to guess seeing as the comment is so short but why don't we all assume the best of each other instead of instantly assuming the worst :)

[–]ExceptionToTheRuleTrans Tomboy -5 points-4 points ago

Hmm lets see, how many women are hatchet-wielding maniacs and how many men can over power a woman physically?

[–]ThePantsParty 2 points3 points ago

Nice word slippage there. Let's try that again with the same word usage in both questions though:

how many women can be hatchet-wielding maniacs and how many men can over power a woman physically?

Well that's easy, for the first question, basically all of them. For the second, the vast majority.

That's how the word 'potential' works, you see. It means "is capable of doing/being". All men are potential rapists, and all women are potential hatchet-wielding maniacs.

[–]wheresmysmokes 1 point2 points ago

I think this is truer than some would like to admit. When you have advances towards you that are consistently turned down, it's so uncomfortable and I'm not just saying that. I can forgive anyone for trying once, but I hate it when I tell them I have a boyfriend, and old men start insulting him. It's unfortunate.

[–]CheetahSauce -3 points-2 points ago

You're god damn right. That's why I dont let guys buy me drinks at the bar. I by them drinks so I can walk away and there is no conformation to be had.

[–]InfamousKelsoSocial Justice, Loudly Demanding Equality -2 points-1 points ago

You should xpost this to TwoX