this post was submitted on
424 points (76% like it)
614 up votes 190 down votes

gifs

unsubscribe342,546 readers

537 users here now

Links to amusing, interesting, or funny .gifs from the web! .gif format submissions only, please!

How to make your own animated gifs?

Please try not to repost and post reaction gifs in /r/reactiongifs.

Looking for a specific gif? Try /r/gifrequests

Direct image links preferred! Avoid pages that have other extraneous material besides the gif like headers, banners, ads, etc. And please, no blogspam. URL-shorteners are NOT allowed!

Witty titles optional. nsfw when necessary; this implies the comments within will be too.

Nudity and obscene material goes into /r/nsfw_gifs - No exceptions. If it can get you fired then it should not be here. Failure to comply will result in removal of post and banning.

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 45 comments

[–]Sergeantman94 48 points49 points ago

It's a matter of preference. While the nolan movies did have tons of memorable moments, one thing i definately praise the Burton movie for is it's gothic scenery and the fact that Keaton didn't make batman sound like he had lung cancer. I know i might some shit for that, but they are both good movies.

[–]mrpti 2 points3 points ago

absolutely. they're completely different takes on the comics, and can't really be compared in a quantitative manner.

[–]Wodashit 1 point2 points ago

I always have chills while looking at the intro

[–]JorusC 1 point2 points ago

Though Michael Keaton doesn't make the best action hero, I liked his portrayal of Bruce Wayne because he wasn't very smooth. He was a little socially awkward and fumbling - much like you would expect from an eccentric recluse who spends most of his time in a cave underground and puts on a rubber suit to hunt poor people for sport.

And you can't top Jack Nicholson's Joker. Heath Ledger did nice as a psychopath, but there was no real spark to it. He was just crazy. Jack Nicholson had a flair for the character; he could make you laugh and creep you out at the same time.

[–]Sergeantman94 0 points1 point ago

I couldn't have said it better.

[–]o_jax 24 points25 points ago

Jack Nicholson's Joker was just as well done as Heath Ledger's. Where Ledger's portrayal was dark and edgy, Nicholson's was flamboyant and twisted. Both are valid takes on the Joker as he has been written over the years.

1988 Batman is still right up there with the best comic adaptations ever done, and IMO still FAR superior to the Tobey MacGuire Spiderman movies.

[–]Kthulu666 0 points1 point ago

That spiderman looked like he could get injured doing a trustfall, which is a legitimate risk because I'm sure he's the kind of person that believes in the team-building power of the trustfall and does them often.

[–]labachj 17 points18 points ago

I prefer the 88 Batman to the TDK trilogy. I still liked the trilogy, two great films. But the 88 Batman will always be my favorite.(saw it at a drive-in when I was little on the original release). I still say that movie has the definitive motion picture batmobile.

[–]nurdboy42 5 points6 points ago

*89

[–]xelaxela333 8 points9 points ago

If you like comics, you will like Tim's batman. There's nothing wrong with it. They're all great movies, and, most importantly, they all reflect the time period they were made in, and the director's diverse talents and accomplishments.

[–]McExpos 2 points3 points ago

No shame in liking Burton's Batman. I probably enjoy it more than Batman Begins or The Dark Knight Rises myself.

My order, now and forevermore, is The Dark Knight, Batman, and The Mask of the Phantasm. The three best performances of the Joker (even if Jack was too fat for the role), and the three strongest movies in the Batverse.

[–]CampingPirates 8 points9 points ago

Of course he did. Tim Burtons batman feels like a comic book movie and isn't 2 hours too long

[–]strattonbrazil 11 points12 points ago

I liked both for completely different reasons. However, as I read the OP's title, I had Tim Burton's Batman theme going through my mind.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6frI0Xjufg

[–]Reilly149 8 points9 points ago

Danny Elfman has always been amazing, never disappoints.

[–]KoalaBomb 5 points6 points ago

I personally like Batman Forever.

[–]ackshunpact 5 points6 points ago

I love Batman Forever in all its terrible glory.

[–]KoalaBomb 5 points6 points ago

It is glorious! But yeah, quite terrible.

[–]liquidinsects 2 points3 points ago

Surely not more terrible than Batman & Robin.

[–]KoalaBomb 1 point2 points ago

Nah man, Batman and Robin is so bad that it doesn't even fall in the "so bad it's good" category.

[–]dem0nhunter 2 points3 points ago

With the Riddler as Jim Carrey.

Yeah, I mean it that way.

[–]jormugandr 3 points4 points ago

Honestly, I don't feel like TDK and TDK:R really felt like Batman movies. Batman Begins still had the Batman vibe because it was origin-ey and had Arkham and shit, but TDK and TDK:R lost a lot of that. I think it was actually intentional as Gotham became more affluent because the crime was cut down due to Batman and Harvey Dent, it became more clean and less Gothic. In BB, the city looks much more run-down and old like you expect Gotham to look.

Tim Burton's Batman felt a helluva lot like Batman.

[–]ackshunpact 0 points1 point ago

TDK > Batman > Batman Begins > TDKR

[–]Barrell -1 points0 points ago

Yeah, I'd probably make the same face if someone told me they like something better than than something else.

[–]LeviWasTaken 0 points1 point ago

As a kid, Batman and Batman Returns were perfect for me. It filled my imagination, allowed me to have fun, and showed me how to be a super hero.

As an adult, the new Dark Knight films are better suited to my mindset today. They fill me with motivation, passion, and plenty of important ideas and themes for my brain to chew upon.

They both deliver on what they set out to do.

[–]Phoequinox 0 points1 point ago

I'm in the "don't care" party, but I will say that Nolan's take was a bit more tense and edgy than most people really want. The trilogy would have been just a drop in the ocean if not for Heath Ledger.

[–]kriswone 0 points1 point ago

same.

[–]BipBopBoop 0 points1 point ago

I love both. I wish I could take Keaton and plop him down into the TDK trilogy.

[–]SigmaDraconisIV 0 points1 point ago

The Tumbler....it's just....no.

[–]gJonny 0 points1 point ago

Ha I saw this interview, it was for the last movie. The interviewer said something like why did you only film indoors or something like that

[–]kalleguld 0 points1 point ago

Please try not to repost and post reaction gifs in /r/reactiongifs.

[–]mitterco 0 points1 point ago

I must be an evil person because I can't stand TDK trilogy. Absolutely despise it. And love the Burton Batman movies to death.

I can't help it, there is just something about TDK that doesn't quite work with me. Maybe it's just that it's trying too hard to be gritty and "real" or something, I don't know. More power to those that like it, I'm fine with people who enjoyed them, but I didn't. At all.

Meanwhile I can still sit down and watch both Burton movies and enjoy them immensely. They haven't aged poorly at all. They are, to me, what Batman should be.

Don't hate me. sadface

[–]JorusC 0 points1 point ago

I have a whole list of reasons why I not only dislike The Dark Knight, but believe it to be an objectively terrible movie.

Batman Begins was really cool. I haven't bothered to see the third one yet. But Burton's original Batman is still my favorite. So don't worry, I don't hate you. I feel your pain.

[–]Gamer_ely 1 point2 points ago

I prefer the 1960's batman movie... too much nostalgia

[–]cody_au -5 points-4 points ago

He probably has not seen them recently.

My girlfriend and I have been through the TDK trilogy and just watched the original Tim Burton Batman movies a few days ago. She said they were okay, but I felt they were extremely dated.

Despite what people said at the time about them being "dark", I feel they are comparing to the old "WHAM, KAZOO!" version. They are still extremely comical compared to what we're used to today.

They have not aged well. The villains were laughable. The plots weren't good. None of it was "believable" like the current versions.

[–]does_not_care 2 points3 points ago

None of it was "believable" like the current versions.

What type of fantasy world do you live in?

[–]cody_au -1 points0 points ago

If I'm living in a fantasy world, I deserve to be kicked in the balls for a terribly masochistic imagination.

[–]Enda169 1 point2 points ago

I'd say the current versions are at least as over the top as the Burton ones. The effects are better, but that's about it.

[–]JorusC 0 points1 point ago

Like how a steel cable tied to a lamp post can trip a speeding semi end-over-end?

[–]eztarget896 0 points1 point ago

i was born the day batman 89 came out (june 23, 1989), that plus of how good it was it has a special place as my favorite batman movie

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]BroadStreetElite 2 points3 points ago

You're clearly not a die-hard fan then

[–]skip_tracer 0 points1 point ago

wat?

[–]halupki 1 point2 points ago

"I'm a Die Hard Bruce Willis Fan" "Wait, there is actually a movie called Die Hard?"