this post was submitted on
1,346 points (53% like it)
9,868 up votes 8,522 down votes

funny

subscribe2,654,420 readers

8,080 users here now

Results of the facebook poll

Reminder: Political posts are not permitted in /r/funny. Try /r/PoliticalHumor instead!

NEW! No gore or porn (including sexually graphic images). Other NSFW content must be tagged as such

Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress. Try /r/politicalhumor instead.

  • Rage comics - Go to /r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 274

[–]Warlaw 85 points86 points ago

Those are child wrestlers from Georgia (former Soviet Republic, not the US state) who were intentionally fattened up to make them heavier combatants if anyone was curious.

[–]melbournian 17 points18 points ago

Thanks, this should be near the top for everyone one else wondering where this is as it's clearly not from America.

[–]ViagraSailor 1 point2 points ago

Still McDonalds... The post doesn't say anything about 'Murica.

[–]melbournian 0 points1 point ago

For context, at the time of posting my comment most of the top comments were about America or wondering where the photo was taken.

[–]SatanIsMyCopilot 99 points100 points ago

"You gonna eat that tray??"

[–]loricasegmentata 69 points70 points ago

This kid needs to be taken into care before he becomes a meat hulk.

[–]treetop82 14 points15 points ago

That kid needs new parents

[–]Thefriendlyfaceplant 12 points13 points ago

Seriously, and to think we were worried about the LHC turning into a black hole...

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]unusedalias 6 points7 points ago

totes

[–]Rizzpooch 3 points4 points ago

[–]RudegarWithFunnyHat 8 points9 points ago

when he gets mad, he turn into a skinny green guy

[–]iamadogforreal 26 points27 points ago

This picture is at least 5 years old. He's probably a super obese teenager now and will be on one of those daytime talk shows about "Food addiction" or some other bullshit.

[–]FlinginFlangin 18 points19 points ago

He's probably on Reddit.

[–]Zosoer 5 points6 points ago

With a neckbeard.

[–]thepowerisyours 4 points5 points ago

He's probably dead.

[–]bonzos_montreux 13 points14 points ago

With a neckbeard.

[–]nitefang 2 points3 points ago

That or the desire to have sex will motivate him to stop eating so much.

[–]Brittany_EE 0 points1 point ago

Aye, I remember seeing this back in 2002!

[–]adanvdo 3 points4 points ago

[–]zxof 0 points1 point ago

The pic is quite old, either they got helped or there're meat hulks somewhere by now.

[–]eXXaXion 1 point2 points ago

Seriously though, could it be that this kid just really wants to be a sumo wrestler?

The sport is still pretty popular in Japan and maybe we've been making fun of a kid for living his dream all this time (this is at least the 4th repost I'v epersonally seen).

[–]dubcaps 43 points44 points ago

before anyone says anything, the picture was not taken in the US.

[–]Hopper64 1 point2 points ago

But-

[–]vteckickedin 0 points1 point ago

it looks like it was...

[–]Necromancer023 140 points141 points ago

The point of the picture is that the chubby kid ate all the products from the farm, and thus the farm is not functioning anymore.

[–][deleted] 76 points77 points ago

But if the child is eating the farms produce it is a profitable venture and should be able to sustain itself, or indeed experience growth.

[–]evereal 50 points51 points ago

The child did not reimburse the farm for the produce that he consumed.

[–][deleted] 47 points48 points ago

Well then surely this is a matter for the courts. Has this...Old Mcdonald, secured legal council?

[–]MrAkademik 26 points27 points ago

counsel. FTFY.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points ago

My many thanks kind sir.

[–]thatnewjunksmell 2 points3 points ago

These new age militants are too polite.

[–]pepipopa 8 points9 points ago

Old mcdonald secured legal counsel eeya eeya oo

[–]Chiglio 7 points8 points ago

Who's to say he didn't eat the farmer too?

[–]bondsons 3 points4 points ago

Or else his eating outpaced the farm's production. Supply could not keep up with his demand.

[–]popidge 16 points17 points ago

Unless the child, a savvy investor, rallied up enough venture capital to purchase Mr McDonald's farm and all related assets outright, and proceeded to liquidate the assets into food products and consume them all without sale or replacement of assets. At this point, the child then sold the farmland and buildings to a real estate developer at a greater price than he bought it, due to volatile market conditions, who then demolished it and turned it into a high-rise apartment block.

Or, y'know, kid mini-hulked out and went on a murderous meat rampage through a farm.

[–]BlueBird518 0 points1 point ago

not if he ate the farmer after he ate all the animals.

[–]pepipopa 0 points1 point ago

I think it means he ate the farmer too who had no offspring leaving the farm empty.

[–]joelwna 25 points26 points ago

[–]23mac 5 points6 points ago

[–]brawr 14 points15 points ago

That kid is beyond chubby.

[–]DemonMuffins 12 points13 points ago

I don't know why you got downvoted. He does look obese.

[–]DeliriousYeti 4 points5 points ago

I very much doubt that food came from a farm.

[–]leedorham 2 points3 points ago

Factory farm maybe, but still a farm. I don't think we have a different word for it yet.

[–]FaptainAwesome 3 points4 points ago

Thank you

[–]smokey44 0 points1 point ago

Guess this post shows how not everyone can be a successful comedian or even write jokes

[–]TsunamiTreats -1 points0 points ago

I thought the point was this: New McDonald has a factory farm. FactoryFarmInjustice.tiff

[–]RPrevolution 0 points1 point ago

I thought it was that corporations displace small businesses

[–]Zosoer 0 points1 point ago

Thanks for that, it wasn't clear at all.

[–]Necromancer023 0 points1 point ago

You are welcome.

[–]Drantis 0 points1 point ago

or another way to look at it is that Old McDonald('s) is "farming" fat kids.

[–]peacecake 32 points33 points ago

Their parents suck.

[–]massenburger 18 points19 points ago

I agree. I can't think of even a theoretical situation where a kid being overweight, under the age of at least 12, is not the fault of their parents or caretakers. It's sick! They're just kids! Take away the fuckin' food!

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Stabone130 6 points7 points ago

My nephew is this size. Its heartbreaking. Ive talked to my brother numerous times. Sone parents are just irresponsible like this.

[–]4n7h0ny 1 point2 points ago

What are his parents responses when you ask them about it?

[–]Stabone130 1 point2 points ago

Typically? That its genetic. Or he's just a "bigger" kid. Weird thing is that he's a twin -- his brother being very, very small and lanky. Of course, he doesn't eat donuts and is very very active.

My other nephew has emotional issues. Probably because he's heavy. he's heavy because he has emotional issues. Its a cycle. He eats his sorrows away in donuts and soda.

I've had flat-out fights with my brother when I've tried to take the kids out for lunch (healthy options). Of course, my overweight nephew doesn't want to eat anything but crap because its all that he knows.

[–]mizztanya 0 points1 point ago

Doesn't the thin twin sort of prove the obese kid is the one with the problem and not the parents? Surely if it was the parents then both of the twins would be obese? Obviously the parents need to work more with him, but we each have our own paths, parents can only influence sometimes.

[–]Stabone130 0 points1 point ago

Not really. They're 7 or 8 so parents are still responsible for them, setting up their routines, giving them guidance, offering a healthy lifestyle. One kid has embraced being active and at least burning off those shitty meals. He does eat a little bit better than his brother though. the other kid isn't active, my brother + his wife enable this in various ways......

[–]KittyL0ver 2 points3 points ago

In families where a child has Prader-Willi Syndrome, parents have had to pad lock the refrigerator. One the characteristics of Prader-Willi Syndrome is that you always feel hungry.

I realize the kids in this photo probably do not have this, just listing a rare theoretical situation.

[–]AlwaysHere202 1 point2 points ago

Theoretical situation... the kid is literally living alone on the streets, and is REALLY good at stealing food.

There found one!

But, yes, seriously guardians! Take proper care of your kids!

[–]BowsNToes21 1 point2 points ago

But little Jimmy cries when he does not have he daily dose of Mc Donald's and KFC. What am I to do?

[–]option_i 1 point2 points ago

I'd give the food to a homeless man and make sure he sees it. Then, with a smirk, hand the kid the vegetables.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

Hormone imbalances do cause obesity in a small number of cases. It's nowhere near as common as overeating especially in the U.S., but seriously, "I can't think of even a theoretical situation" is a bit of an overreaction.

[–]TheNarwhalingBacon 0 points1 point ago

I remember seeing a picture titled, "the largest man in the world". It was an old, date picture, probably taken in the early 1900s. The man was not large at all. Very very small compared to others. He was fat alright, but if you saw that he was the largest man in the world at the time, you would probably retract your opinion.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

I'm not sure what you're trying to say. It's not my "opinion" that endocrine problems can cause obesity.

One of the biggest contributors to hormone-linked obesity in modern populations is thought to be chemical additives to foods like meat. I don't think that was as large of an issue back then. The people haven't changed, but the foods we eat have certainly changed.

[–]TheNarwhalingBacon 0 points1 point ago

I agree with you. I just don't think that those types of problems should make people That obese. Unhealthy or inactive lifestyles combined with unhealthy eating is the main cause, if there is some chemical issue, the issue alone will not make them obese, it has to combine with something like unhealthy eating to result in obesity.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Somehow this devolved into folks thinking I was denying the effects of poor diet and lack of exercise on obesity. That's definitely not the case. All I was doing was responding to someone saying that he couldn't imagine a hypothetical situation where someone could be overweight without eating a lot of fast food.

[–]TheNarwhalingBacon 0 points1 point ago

I apologize then, I must've misread you. I do agree with you though, just expressing my own opinion.

[–]massenburger -1 points0 points ago

I did not know about hormone imbalances. My previous "not knowing about a theoretical situation" still stands for that comment, because I personally could not think of a situation. Now I know. Also, there was no reason to be snarky about "knowing something I don't know". We all know something other people don't, but that doesn't mean we get to be an ass about it.

[–]jimbo_akimbo 0 points1 point ago

They are children from Georgia of the former USSR, who were child wrestlers. They were intentionally fattened up to make them heavier combatants.

[–]krisJennerisaman 20 points21 points ago

looks like the Michelin man

[–]Flomo420 6 points7 points ago

he looks like a fully articulated action-figure... or should i say INaction-figure. HOOOOOOOOOO

[–]frogminator 1 point2 points ago

[–]SpectreOfMalta -1 points0 points ago

It is actually him

[–]LouSpudol 86 points87 points ago

The problem here is that people will then blame McDonald's. This is the fundamental flaw within our culture and society these days. Not to get all cry-baby or political, but everyone in this generation blames the other for their problems. It's never your fault. It's always someone else's.

Then you bitch about more of our freedoms being stripped away, but you are the ones who lobby for them! You buy into this "McDonald's made me fat" bull shit and then laws are created to limit those restaurants, take away your cigarettes and charge you 30 dollars a pack, etc.

My point is, you have the freedom to choose what you eat, where you eat, if you want to smoke or if you don't want to smoke. Education is out there. It's readily available. If you want a cigarette to relax at the end of the day, all the power to you. If you want to eat at McDonald's because you don't want to make dinner, by all means order away. You know the risks of habitual use of these things and the choice is yours.

McDonald's didn't make you fat, your inability to eat healthy otherwise, diet, exercise, made you fat. It's easy to blame someone else for your problems, it's a lot harder to look in the mirror and admit you did it to yourself. Unfortunately, we live in a society which coddles the former rather then the latter.

Moderation. It's all about moderation.

[–]Thefriendlyfaceplant 31 points32 points ago

I think everyone is judging the parents here. Granted, McD's entire business model is aimed at luring in kids and keep them as adult customers, but in the end it's the parents putting down the money for that poison.

[–]Haud 9 points10 points ago

It's not poison per se: you can occasionally eat at mc donalds and still be healthy. It's the habitual eating of it that makes it bad.

[–]LouSpudol 4 points5 points ago

They don't even advertise to kids anymore, it's not allowed. I used to love McDonald's as a kid. What's not to like, the toy, the playground, the food. It was all good. My parents only took me seldom though or when I was being good or deserved it. So you are right it is parents fault.

Chucky Cheese has a whole lot more than McDonald's does and I am sure their food isn't any healthier, their profit margins are just not high enough to condemn them though....it's all about money.

[–]ashishduh 5 points6 points ago

I think you've got your generations mixed up, it's the parents who blame McDonald's instead of realizing they're what's wrong with this picture.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]defiantcompliance 9 points10 points ago

I agree that we don't need laws restricting the sale of unhealthy foods but I also believe that companies like McDonalds and those that manufacture and distribute cigarettes are intentionally preying upon the weak and or ignorant for profit. They are betting on the fact that most people will be uninformed about the adverse health effects of some of their products.

Why do we keep drug dealers away from children? Because the kids don't know any better and my try whatever they are prompted to. I know its quite a leap to compare something that can have an immediate negative impact like heroin to french fries but my point is that I think we have an obligation as a society to inform and to an extent protect those who are incapable of doing so for themselves.

[–]LouSpudol 1 point2 points ago

While this argument might have held up in the 50's there isn't a soul on this planet who doesn't know that smoking kills. It's everywhere. You can't avoid it. Even if you haven't seen any of the billion anti-smoking campaigns or listened to one of the other billion people who do know it's bad, you can kind of figure it out when you realize you're inhaling blackened smoke into your lungs repeatedly for hours a day. It's kind of common sense.

They are a business. I wouldn't say they prey on the weak as much as they stop at nothing to make a profit. Selling them in the first place proves this point. And for the record we don't keep drug dealers away from children. Children are being medicated with all sorts of crap for illnesses they probably don't even have. Just because it's legal doesn't make them any better sometimes. Just look at the sudden increase in ADD prescriptions in the 90's to see this point. ADD certainly exists, but all who are diagnosed certainly don't have it.

It's amazing how people can pick and choose their battles based on public perception. This is okay, but McDonald's is bad. Why? What makes them any worse? Just because they make the most money?

I agree with your last point. We do have an obligation and we do inform out people of the consequences. It is then up to those people to take the info they have been given and to either listen or ignore it IE their choice.

Just the way I see it anyway.

[–]defiantcompliance 0 points1 point ago

While this argument might have held up in the 50's there isn't a soul on this planet who doesn't know that smoking kills. It's everywhere. You can't avoid it.

Yes, a significant effort has been made to deter people from smoking but this has only come about recently and it was not the tobacco companies idea. If there hadn't been a campaign to expose the efforts of cigarette companies to market their products to minors and to hide the health consequences of smoking, do you think the companies would have eventually checked themselves? Probably not. The profit incentive is too strong. Likewise with McDonalds. They are aware that french fries and sodas are unhealthy but they are still push these items to the consumer. How many times have you heard them ask "would you like fries with that?" or "would you like to make it a combo today for a dollar more?" They bundle toys with kids meals which include soda and fries thereby directly marketing to children.

they stop at nothing to make a profit

Exactly.

we don't keep drug dealers away from children

I was referring to illicit drugs. No those prescribed by doctors to the children.

This is okay, but McDonald's is bad. Why? What makes them any worse? Just because they make the most money?

Prevalence. McDonalds is everywhere. Every neighborhood, every television station, radio station, etc. They are targeted because they are the biggest and most recognizable name in the fast junk food industry.

[–]LouSpudol 1 point2 points ago

My point is this doesn't make it okay to take away from people wholly or charge them a tax if they choose to eat this. That is un-american and wrong. So it's unhealthy, we know this, why can't it be up to you to eat their daily or not? The facts are on the table by the ways you have mentioned above.

I work in public health (surprise I know haha) and they were recently discussing how they wanted to lobby to make it illegal to smoke in your car. That would mean a cop could pull you over and write you an $85 ticket for smoking a cigarette you paid for in the car you paid for. And people will be okay with this because "smoking is bad for you". Okay? So? We know that, so why can't I then be trusted to make my own informed decision? Why do you have to make it for me? Why will you then penalize me if I do? Police and state officials will all vote for it because hey, they know they'll make money on it, and that's what it all boils down to. Money. If they can make a buck they'll support it. It will bring revenue to the cities and towns.

My point is there are other ways to go about it.

[–]RabidKillerPoof 2 points3 points ago

As someone who used to be very overweight and is now around 175 and still losing weight I learned one important thing: being unhealthy/overweight is a choice. It was that simple!

I chose if I worked out or not and what I ate. As soon as I realized this I have been living a much healthier and happier life.

[–]sk4ht 1 point2 points ago

Upvote granted for personal responsibility.

[–]Zosoer 2 points3 points ago

“Everything in moderation, including moderation.”

― Oscar Wilde

[–]iamadogforreal 0 points1 point ago

I imagine what he eats at mcdonalds is 100% healthier than the shit his parents have been feeding him his whole life.

I've seen fat little fuckers like this devour a 2000 calorie whole pizza (much worse than a mcdonalds kids meal 400 calories).

[–]ryanjewell 6 points7 points ago

I just put in a pizza, I was going to eat it all but after reading your comment I will limit myself to half.

[–]RoflStomper 3 points4 points ago

See? Progress!

[–]El_Dudereno 0 points1 point ago

IDK what McD's kids meal you're getting but the single cheese burger alone is 300 kcal, add fries and a drink to that and you're probably up to the kids daily recommended limit.

[–]iamadogforreal 0 points1 point ago

http://fastfoodmarketing.org/media/FastFoodFACTS_KidsMealCalories.pdf

I picked the first value. Doesnt include fries. So 600 with fries.

Little fat fuck sits down and munches a medium size pizza (I was fat when young and did this, so dont tell its not possible)

http://fatsecret.com/calories-nutrition/generic/pizza-with-meat?portionid=18840&portionamount=1.000

almost 2500 calories.

[–]Stabone130 1 point2 points ago

I'm a fit, skinny guy. Know why? I dont eat at McDonalds.

[–]LouSpudol 5 points6 points ago

I eat McDonald's occasionally and I too am a fit in skinny guy. McDonald's is just another restaurant among the thousands of other restaurants that happen to serve unhealthy food. They just happen to be the most successful and with success comes scrutiny.

If you look at Applebees, Friday's, Tuesday's, Texas Road Head, and the like, those places are FAR more unhealthy than even McDonald's. The whole point is you shouldn't go out to eat every day. It's not healthy period. It's no ones fault but your own for doing so. No one made you do anything.

[–]Zosoer 1 point2 points ago

Texas Road Hoad

I already like the sound of that place.

[–]Chester_frenchkiss 0 points1 point ago

Literally nobody in this thread can get the name right. Road House!

[–]Zosoer 0 points1 point ago

The name was a lot cooler before.

[–]Stabone130 0 points1 point ago

McDonalds is much cheaper therefore more accessible by more people, so probably why its scrutinized. You can certainly be "skinny" and eat at McDonalds. I should have said "healthy" because I don't eat at McDonalds. You may be skinny but your arteries could be clogged -- and cholesterol and triglycerides completely out of whack.

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

I'm as healthy as a horse cock.

[–]shenpen 2 points3 points ago

You know what? They have sandwiches at 500 calories. Get three a day and you are still on starvation levels. The problem is not that people eat at McDonalds but that they eat too much. If it is a meal with soda and fries, it is already too much. But a sandwich is OK, even if it is a Big Mac.

[–]jsellout 2 points3 points ago

Hey guys! GUYS! This guy says I can eat three big macs a day and LOSE weight. See you at McDonald's guys!

[–]JazzyNips 2 points3 points ago

If you use up more calories than you take in during the day, you will lose weight, no matter what you eat. You won't be healthy necessarily, your blood pressure and cholesterol will probably be through the roof, but yes, you can lose weight eating mcdonalds if you use more calories than you put in. Moderation people, moderation.

[–]Zosoer 1 point2 points ago

As long as you work out everyday, don't get fries and soda.

[–]jsellout 2 points3 points ago

This deal gets worse all the time!

[–]RedLegionnaire 1 point2 points ago

I've altered the deal, pray I don't alter it further.

[–]Zosoer 2 points3 points ago

You could be fit and skinny AND still eat at McDonalds.

[–]GrandfatherFucker 4 points5 points ago

SO BRAVE.

[–]DrEagle 0 points1 point ago

I, too, am skinny.

A big mac meal was my favorite growing up. Now, I'm lucky if I eat it twice a year.

[–]AustinTreeLover -1 points0 points ago

Sorry so long, but I've given this a lot of thought and wanted to share.

I agree that people should take personal responsibility, but this idea that it's just about a culture not taking responsibility is grossly oversimplified, in my opinion.

We live in a culture where individuals are expected to be responsible, but major corporations with virtually unlimited resources are not accountable at all.

There will always be people who will not take responsibility and as someone who eats very healthy and exercises, I know it can be done. Of course, I am educated and have reasonable resources to eat healthy. (Whole Foods FTW!) Let me repeat: I agree there are people who do not take personal responsibility. I just don't agree that's the only contributing factor to the problem.

The typical parent in the U.S. (I am assuming you are talking about the U.S, even though someone above is saying this kid isn't American) is working against advertisers who spend more in a day on pushing their crappy food on the population than the average American makes in a life time. They spend $.23 a person for the entire human population.

And it works. They wouldn't do it if it didn't work. They are pushing poison on your kids at an incredible rate. If you turned on the television and saw a cartoon character saying, "Hey, kids! Smokey the Cigarette says join me in a toke! It's fun! Buy a pack of ciggies and get this free toy!" We'd be appalled. In fact, Joe Camel took a lot of shit for this reason. But, put cheese on it and hey, that's just the American way! Buck up!

Yes, ultimately it is up to the consumer to use moderation or to just eat healthy overall. (Doesn't matter how many times or in what way I say this, someone will accuse me of the opposite) But, blaming it all on an overindulgent culture is not reasonable either.

It reminds me of Nancy Reagan's "Just say no" campaign. Yes, Nancy, ultimately the individual has to say no to crack. But, children make poor decisions and if a fifth grader passes 10 drugs dealers on the way to school, it's not necessarily a character flaw to make an error in judgement. It's human. We have higher expectations for a fifth grader in a poverty-striken inner city than we do for billion dollar corporations. Nancy: Let's completely ignore poverty and under-education, let's blame it on the 10 year old combatting crack dealers to get to his underfunded school! Nancy oversimplified the problem.

My point is companies and government (we're still calling those separate entities, right?) are not even expected to take responsibility.

We've been tricked into believing that we're all lazy pieces of shit (some of us are, of course), all things are even and we just don't step up. If only we were more responsible and so on. But, there is no expectation of responsibility on the companies we're buying from and I would argue that is equally a problem.

Edit: One more thing -

Education is out there. It's readily available.

Right. How did it get out there? Because Ronald McDonald and Joe Camel decided it was the right thing to do? No, because people bitched and fought for it. The education is there precisely because people demanded it. Now, demanding it makes you irresponsible and a cry-baby.

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

I agree with some of your points, however I never said it was the only cause or reason.

Advertising does work, you're right, or else they wouldn't waste their money. It's all about staying relevant and by constant saturation in media you are aware they still exist. Car companies abuse this the most. Turn on your TV even now and I guarantee you will see a car commercial. They are on all the time all day. This doesn't mean everyone is dropping what they are doing and buying cars though. It just means that when you do want to buy a car, you will think of them.

Now we eat daily so you can argue "next time you're hungry you'll think of McDonald's", but this too is an over simplification. Many people don't even like McDonald's. Those who do might not be in the mood, don't want to make the trip, want to go somewhere better, etc. My point being the marketing is mostly there as a reminder rather than a brainwashing tool to send you subliminal messages to eat up johnny!

Kids are always going to want McDonald's just like they are always going to want Candy and Ice Cream and other unhealthy things children love. This is natural, what's unnatural is to give them candy every day or ice cream everyday if they ask for it....same way it would be wrong to give them McDonald's. So if you're not going to give them one why give them the other? Why is one concept so easy to grasp, but the other so difficult?

Candy rots your teeth. We know this. If you ate candy everyday you would have horrible dental problems. You can't blame the candy company for you having shitty teeth, you have to blame yourself for eating that shit everyday and not brushing your teeth (equivalent to exercising after eating shitty food) enough to prevent those cavities (becoming obese).

I am not saying it's as simple as this, I am just saying you too are responsible. It's not their fault you took too much from the pot. They are in the business to make money. You enjoy it, they will continue to make it. It's not their job to say "i think you've had enough sir". That's more or less your own job.

Do I think corporations get away with too much? Absolutely, but I feel there are more important industries where this happens and needs to be stopped more so than the food industry. Banks for one are the worst.

[–]AustinTreeLover 1 point2 points ago

Turn on your TV even now and I guarantee you will see a car commercial. They are on all the time all day. This doesn't mean everyone is dropping what they are doing and buying cars though.

Cars cost a considerable amount. You couldn't just go out and buy a car any time you wanted. Also, car commercials are marketed toward adults. In general, however, we Americans consume A LOT. Way more than most countries and we mostly buy shit we don't need. I would argue that has a lot to do with advertising and a lot to do with having few controls on advertisers.

My point being the marketing is mostly there as a reminder rather than a brainwashing tool to send you subliminal messages to eat up johnny!

As someone with a degree in communications and marketing, this is completely false. "Brainwashing" may be a strong word, but advertisers are absolutely not just sending a reminder, this is a common misconception. They do spend money sending meta messages or "subliminal" messages. Marketing is a sophisticated tool these days, it's not passive or there for friendly reminders. It's driven toward and directed at the biggest spenders and the weakest links. And they lie. They call it "framing", but framing is just another word for lying. Much like spin. It is deliberate and pervasive and relentless.

This is natural, what's unnatural is to give them candy every day or ice cream everyday if they ask for it....same way it would be wrong to give them McDonald's.

Agree totally.

I am not saying it's as simple as this, I am just saying you too are responsible.

Also agree.

They are in the business to make money.

Except that in the U.S. they are considered human beings, money is free speech, etc. They have the same rights, but few of the same expectations. If someone is selling crack on the corner to children, we look at that person as a shitheel. It's still up to the parents to tell the kid not to do crack, but the crack dealer is still a shitheel. This goes back to the company having no responsibility. We treat the phrase "to make money" as it was brought down on stone tablets from Moses. We go on the assumption that anything's okay, if money. I disagree. I think they are in business to provide a service and/or product and have a responsibility to make sure the product is safe or properly and fairly labeled. I believe they have a responsibility to the community, their employees and the environment. They may be here to make money, but they are here for other things as well and it's those expectations that often aren't being met.

You enjoy it, they will continue to make it.

That's how simple supply and demand is supposed to work. But, we are not dealing in a free market based society here. Those days are gone.

It's not their job to say "i think you've had enough sir".

I'm not saying that. I'm saying the have a responsibility to not lie, hide the truth, make exaggerated claims, manipulate, coerce, frame things erroneously, or otherwise do anything it takes to turn a buck. Then, someone caves to pressure and we yell, "Loser! Take personal responsibility!" Well, indeed. I just want to hear people calling McDonald's losers, too, because they sell crap. But, we won't because money.

Banks for one are the worst.

Word.

Would like to add that I appreciate having this rationale discussion without hyperbole, name calling, etc. We agree on some points and disagree on some points, but I am grateful the discussion could take place.

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

Also agree on the rationale discussion without name calling etc....you dick.

...haha just kidding. I am also grateful! We'll discuss more when I actually get some work done today and feel a little more accomplished haha.

[–]AustinTreeLover 1 point2 points ago

Yeah, I gotta go to. Time for lunch. In a hurry, just gonna pick up some McDonald's . . .

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

sounds delicious...I'm jealous. haha

[–]lateral_moves 0 points1 point ago

"Victims. Aren't we all?" - Eric Draven

[–]s1thl0rd 0 points1 point ago

I agree, though I feel if the majority of people say "you can't smoke here because you can't do so without causing us to inhale the smoke" then they should have the collective ability to tell the smoker to leave.

[–]Sogeking99 0 points1 point ago

Yeah people nowadays. 'You eat from McD's? Did you SEE Supersize Me?!'. Um yes but I don't eat it every day do I? I eat from there, may once a month, normally less.

This kid is grossly overweight, Should you blame the fast food restaurant? NO. You blame the immature parents that let there kids get in that state.

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

Also there are movies that completely denounce Morton Spurlock's entire film. There's the counter film (no not super-high-me) where the guy does the same exact thing although exercises common sense and "doesn't super size" things if he doesn't want it and he actually loses weight. Not only did he lose weight, but his cholesterol actually lowered....this was against everything his doctors said as well. Are they somehow correlated? No, it just proves it's both are completely irrelevant.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

You know i would be OK with that but I don't want to have to pay retarded taxes to cover for the idiots who have cancer from smoking or obese fifth graders who can't move.

[–]Finaltidus 0 points1 point ago

McDonald's didn't make you fat, your inability to eat healthy otherwise, diet, exercise, made you fat.

This isnt always the case. Like in this picture, it isnt the kids fault, its the lazy parent.

[–]dust_free 0 points1 point ago

So your solution to the obesity epidemic is PSAs urging moderation? I foresee a very fat future.

[–]ashishduh 4 points5 points ago

No the solution is better parents.

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

So your solution to obesity is to ban all fast foods and take them away from everyone because a few people become fat and it's somehow not their fault but McDonald's?

[–]dust_free -1 points0 points ago

Social engineering, man. It's the way of the future.

No, I don't think they should be banned, but I also don't think a McDouble should cost a dollar.

[–]RedLegionnaire 0 points1 point ago

Thanks asshole. How much money do you want out of my pocket, cause I practically inhale those things.

PS. I'm a 105lb Korean guy.

[–]dust_free -1 points0 points ago

That's the whole point! You've been incentivized to clog your arteries with absurdly cheap hamburgers. It would only be "money out of your pocket" if you insist on paying more money for bad food even if, hypothetically, healthy food was available for such low prices.

I don't see anything wrong with you paying a little more to subsidize improved public health. After all, it is people like you who are driving up the cost of healthcare with your diabetes and heart disease.

Oh, and wtf does your race have to do with it?

[–]RedLegionnaire 0 points1 point ago

But y u so mad?

I jest, but in seriousness, no, I hike regularly, eat healthy when I can, and ultimately, it comes down to personal accountability. McDonald's gave no one diabetes, they gave it to themselves in their lack of self control. There I said it. I was a child of the 90s (so brave, i no rite?) and was bombarded with mass consumerist adverts and immersed in a consumerist society. Yet SOMEHOW I've grown up to be a fiscally responsible, productive member of society, and I'm not some slave to the whims of corporate advertising boards.

And the indication of my race has to do with the fact that part of my health is dependent on luck, in regards to metabolism.

Ultimately, while I agree public health is a valid concern, I disagree with you that the responsibility should lie with those providing consumer goods.

[–]dust_free 0 points1 point ago

But under your narrative lies the unanswered question: why is there a growing class of people who don't seem to care if they die decades earlier? Are they mentally deficient? Should we subsidize their healthcare with our higher premiums? Why are poor people so much more likely to be obese?

Just answer these questions. I imagine that your answer will be somewhere between "it's not my business" and "stupid people are going to do stupid things."

And I would tend to agree with you, if it wasn't for two factors.

  1. Children don't deserve to be raised on unhealthy food
  2. We subsidize obesity illnesses through healthcare premiums

Just address those two things, that's all I ask.

[–]RedLegionnaire 0 points1 point ago

The well being of children is the responsibility of their parents first and their society second. Feeding children EXCLUSIVELY junk food or high fat, low fiber slag is tantamount to child abuse and should be recognized as such.

The healthcare debate goes deeper than this discussion alone, obviously, but I must concede that I do not have a solid counter argument for this one. I suppose it would come down to the choice to live unhealthily or government regulation of dietary intake, and it's obvious which one Americans would choose. The increased premiums would essentially be an expression of our disdain for government control - which I will admit doesn't justify them.

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

So you think that extra money you'd be paying should be a tax? I disagree 100%

[–]dust_free 0 points1 point ago

Well then go vote for Ron Paul.

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

So you're saying you are for a tax on unhealthy food. You think big government should tell you what you can eat now as well? You socialists are very hard to understand.

This has nothing to do with libertarianism or "Ron Paul". It has to do with common sense.

[–]dust_free 0 points1 point ago

Hey, it worked on cigarettes, didn't it? A combination of high taxes and aggressive no-smoking laws has arguably made the USA a better place to live.

Are you against both of these approaches? These taxes are coming, and they are coming because you on the fiscal right have failed to come up with a workable public health policy - that is to say, a way to persuade Americans to stop killing themselves with food.

[–]LouSpudol 0 points1 point ago

No it didn't, educating people worked with cigarettes not charging them up the ass for them. That may have helped, but it doesn't make it the right thing to do.

So I can tell you what you can and cannot eat now as well? Where does it stop. So because certain people can't be responsible with something the majority has to suffer? The lobbying issue with cigarettes was because your smoking effected those who didn't smoke. By you smoking I am now inhaling it as I am in the same room with you. By you eating McDonald's everyday and becoming fat does not effect me in the least.

If I want McDonald's I should be able to have it without having to pay more cause cry babies like you want everyone to be the same.

[–]dust_free 0 points1 point ago

The "slippery slope" argument is, in my opinion, very weak. Just a way to be anti-progressive due to irrational fears.

At the end of the day, if you believe that your right to a cheap hamburger is more important than public health, you should vote that way. However, as the obesity crisis gets worse and worse, I guarantee that opinion will become a small minority.

It really comes down to Social Darwinism, which is a perfectly legitimate philosophy. I just happen to be more collectivist than you, I suppose.

[–]Lots42 0 points1 point ago

Why the fuck not?

Who the hell are you to punish me for wanting a treat? Bastard. Go fuck yourself.

[–]BdogWR33 5 points6 points ago

Am I the only one who sees Michael Jackson?

[–]Thefriendlyfaceplant 2 points3 points ago

You mean the mexican?

[–]PRIME_PATIO_TIME 0 points1 point ago

I think he means the chinchilla.

[–]geehome 1 point2 points ago

Seems like he still raises pigs.

[–]zerosandwiches 1 point2 points ago

"Dafuq is that? Get that goddamned broccoli away from here. GUARDS!"

-That Kid

[–]guantanamoslay 2 points3 points ago

Macdonald.

[–]RaptorX7 1 point2 points ago

Thank you! I thought I was the only one who was annoyed by this.

[–]iHavemyGreencard 4 points5 points ago

He must've eaten old McDonald as well.

[–]Rictheric222 2 points3 points ago

It's not ALL the kids fault http://i.imgur.com/lCkGy.jpg

[–]ToxWatrs 3 points4 points ago

Holy Crap. Even I'M skinnier that them. AND I'M FAT.

[–]Balmsee 1 point2 points ago

I personally like the napkin just laying on his tits, not even tucked in.

[–]VisitChechnya 1 point2 points ago

I don't think this kid has ever eaten anything that has come from a "farm".

[–]Stinger007 0 points1 point ago

Where is the neck?

[–]invioletlight 0 points1 point ago

They aren't even eating kids meals. Look at the size of the drink and fry container, that's an adult size medium probably.

[–]--MEWTWO-- 0 points1 point ago

I always sang it as "has"

[–]conley46 0 points1 point ago

and on his farm he had human like pig :}

[–]Unicornwithnohorn154 0 points1 point ago

Ee i ee i no!

[–]mrMirage 0 points1 point ago

the kid reminds me of the Micheline tire man

[–]digitalinfidel 0 points1 point ago

Hey Chris, how do you spell Farm? E-I-E-I-O

[–]shifty1032231 0 points1 point ago

Old McDonald had a farm; took his kids to the newest happy meal toys and they ate the burgers and fries.

[–]ParkerEH 0 points1 point ago

Joke's on you, McDonalds doesn't use real meat.

[–]Radwagon 0 points1 point ago

Now he's got two.

[–]Megildur1 0 points1 point ago

Is it just me or does the farmer look like Michael Jackson?

[–]Nabstar 0 points1 point ago

Not gonna lie, seen this on 9gag yesterday

[–]Splintz72 1 point2 points ago

Old McDonald had a REPOST.

[–]SerBearistanSelmy 0 points1 point ago

It's a sad day when I'm seeing pictures on reddit that I've already seen on Facebook

[–]greyham0707 0 points1 point ago

Now I want Mcdonalds...for the 2nd time today :(

[–]RavenPixie 0 points1 point ago

His parents want shot. Probably with a harpoon.

[–]Absenteeist 0 points1 point ago

Those fat-sleeves those kids get always freak me out. Nothing like a fat-roll at the wrists.

[–]SwimGuys 0 points1 point ago

That kids fat looks like sleeves over his wrists

[–]ScottiDoo 0 points1 point ago

Saw this last night and didn't submit it to reddit in fear of repost hate. Curse my luck missed out on karma

[–]chemical_imbalance -1 points0 points ago

um... i can't be the only one on here who realized that mcdonald's does not serve duck or pig or many of the other types of animals displayed in the cartoon picture. OP, please take this submission down.

[–]FortBriggs[S] 1 point2 points ago

They do in other countries. Also McRibs are pork.

[–]GRFatman 0 points1 point ago

I feel so bad for those kids and am pissed at their parents. Do their parents understand how hard it is to do field work when you are overweight ? Sickening !

[–]Ludoweez 0 points1 point ago

Once upon a time, there was a farm.

[–]brosenfeld 0 points1 point ago

The Michelin Toddler

[–]Kthnxbai_ 0 points1 point ago

His right wrist makes it look like he's wearing a thick sweater.

[–]smendeZ328 0 points1 point ago

Why does old Mc Donald look so young

[–]Jib96 0 points1 point ago

I like the original post better

[–]WOWNICEONE 0 points1 point ago

They look like the mascot for that tire place.

[–]iDoiStuff -1 points0 points ago

I have seen this reposted 3 times this week, and it's so good, I'm not even mad.

[–]Magicmudkip 0 points1 point ago

I looked at this post mid bite of a mcdouble...

[–]skudzz 0 points1 point ago

Rear speakers are supposed to be at rear...

[–]Snowdrive 0 points1 point ago

funny cause its true!

[–]sk4ht 0 points1 point ago

The kid on the right has fat sleeves

[–]wholovesbevers 1 point2 points ago

That kids poop must be frightening.

[–]boilerlib408 0 points1 point ago

There is a former McDonalds building near my work that is now an organic produce stand. Its name? "Old McDonalds Farm."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Damn bad parents...

[–]KySnow 0 points1 point ago

If your child is this obese and you still bring them to Mcdonalds, fuck you.

[–]h989 0 points1 point ago

I saw this photo back in like 2003-2004, can someone tell me where it originally came from?

[–]DeathBySalad 1 point2 points ago

It's the Michelin man!

[–]eithanw 0 points1 point ago

Are you sure they're not the Michelin-Man's kids?

[–]Super_Boz9 0 points1 point ago

I genuinely feel bad for those kids right now...

[–]Fender6187 0 points1 point ago

I once saw a meme with that kid, and it read, "Hey! You gonna eat that chair?' Priceless.

[–]Caveman788 -1 points0 points ago

Horrible representation though. Old McDonald was definitely an old white guy. Look at the top image! He looks like a Mexican cabbage patch kid. I'm not racist, just saying. The realism in this one is all off.

[–]tidder85 0 points1 point ago

It's funny because he's fat.

[–]DannyBoi1Derz -1 points0 points ago

Dat Wrists!

[–]overused-meme-alert 1 point2 points ago

Dat Wrists

ding ding ding

[–]gunstar69 -1 points0 points ago

This is so sad.

[–]Onahail 0 points1 point ago

[–]GoddammitChuck 0 points1 point ago

Mary had a little lamb, the doctors were surprised But when Old MacDonald had a farm, the doctors nearly died