It surely doesnt seem that way. To point out flaws in what is an otherwise correct comment is to undermine that comment. To do this by pointing out flaws which intend to make it seem as though my points are lacking intellect is to simply comment on your own inability to understand them clearly.

Now maybe you might not argue against the point i have made. But your direct response to the points i made were to leave it alone or leave. If that isnt subtly arguing against my points, i dont know what is. To leave this sub because of idiots who dont understand the concept of it or the content that rightfully belongs in it would be to admit that i am wrong. You telling me to do so is implying that i am wrong. Sooo, nah, but fuck off.

Ignorant asshole? I respond in the desired approach that I feel is appropriate in the situation. When someone tells me to fuck off, they get a big fuck you in return. When their reply hints at me being stupid, i tell em to fuck off once more. so yes i read your posts properly, and understood the reasoning behind them quite well. Correcting someone means they are wrong to the point of it being disruptive. Correcting me in a sub where i post "Hey this is my resume/essay/college app. Is it alright) is one thing. Correcting my grammar/punctuation in a post where A+ work isnt needed is another.

Now with that said, since you restated your first post, I will go ahead and apologize if you just mistakenly wrong down a few extra words. I was rude, but i do hope youre not correcting yourself because you realize im right, and just dont want to admit it.