use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. reddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
reddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, community...
119 users here now
"Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known". -Carl Sagan
You might also enjoy:
r/starparty
r/nasa
r/astronomy
r/cosmology
r/spaceporn
r/astrophys
r/aerospace
r/spaceflight
/r/spacemusic
/r/SpaceX
reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›
Self portrait of Tracy Caldwell Dyson in the Cupola module of the International Space Station observing the Earth below during Expedition 24 (upload.wikimedia.org)
submitted 1 month ago by alexandrei
[–]Angus99 51 points52 points53 points 1 month ago
See, this is why I'd get fired as an astronaut. I'd park my ass there all day. Mission Control could go screw. Call somebody else to water the mice and feed the plants, I'm looking at EARTH OUT MY WINDOW.
[–]ricodued 38 points39 points40 points 1 month ago
What are they gonna do if they fire you? "Hey uh... so, come back down here now."
[–]Asytra 29 points30 points31 points 1 month ago
See, this is why I'd get fired as an astronaut.
Doesn't matter, had space.
[–]alteron808 43 points44 points45 points 1 month ago
Looks like someone's got a profile picture for the rest of their lives.
[–]Sieziggy 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago
Can you imagine showing that picture to your kids or grand kids one day? I'd imagine it would be enough to inspire an entire familial generation of prospective astronauts.
[–]ITJUSTGOTREAL1403 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Being an astronaut will not be a big deal for grand kids / it will be similiar to being an airline traveler, one can only hope the tsa will be gone.
[–]The_Music 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I beg to differ. People always seem to laugh how in the 50's, they thought the 2000's would be like the Jetsons, and much more futuristic than it is today. But yet, we still make insane predictions about our short future.
[–]rsayers 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
True, but in many ways we have surpassed other predictions. Watch the original Star Trek. Aside from teleportation and warp drive, technology is generally more advanced than what they had on the show.
[–]ITJUSTGOTREAL1403 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
iPhone and internet far surpasses any depicted future tech
[–]dlpwillywonka 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Pilots are still impressive to me.
[–]Real_Muthsera 42 points43 points44 points 1 month ago
I've seen that picture before. But it such an inspiring picture, I just simply love it. There is something profound about it, that I can't place my finger on. I think it's the serenity of it all.
[–]Great_Gig_In_The_Sky 25 points26 points27 points 1 month ago
I like to think that when you have that kind of perspective, national boundaries and cultural differences blur together and become insignificant.
[–]cynognathus 63 points64 points65 points 1 month ago
You develop an instant global consciousness, a people orientation, an intense dissatisfaction with the state of the world, and a compulsion to do something about it. From out there on the moon, international politics looks so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, "Look at that, you son of a bitch."
--Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell
[–]feureau 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
I like him.
[–]red_nuts 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
She might be thinking that if she put her forefinger and thumb just so, she could crush the heads of all the (which is it this week, Eurasians or Eastasians?) at once.
Probably not though.
[–]SanityClaus 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Yay! Headcrusher! I miss Kids In The Hall!
[–]TheMetalMatt 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
I know what you mean... I've seen many pictures of the Earth from orbit, and this one somehow strikes a chord. Maybe it's that there's a person in the picture.
[–]alexgmcm 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
It looks like the cover to a sci-fi book.. but it's real-life! :D
[–]DukeBerith 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
To me, it reminds me of the sense of wonder and fascination you have as a child.
This picture reminds me of when I'd go to the beach as a child, and instead of swimming with everyone, I'd just lie down next to the rockpools and watch the ecosystem come to life as the day went on.
[–]nicecrispybacon 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
"you can't take the sky from meeeeee"
[–]Solomon_Gunn 11 points12 points13 points 1 month ago
Reminds me much of the opening of mass effect 1
And Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.
[–]Davesbeard 12 points13 points14 points 1 month ago
Ripley!!!
[–]Markulatura 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
glad that i'm not the only one who was confused by the picture D:
[–]SplodeyDope 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago
Some women, just want to watch the world turn.
[–]wildcard1992 7 points8 points9 points 1 month ago
I just realized how much easier it would be to take a self portrait in space. You just leave the camera there on a timer and wait. You don't need a tripod or a table or anything to rest the camera on, it just floats there.
[–]ricodued 29 points30 points31 points 1 month ago
Good luck not accidentally even slightly touching the camera to send it spinning on any axis.
[–]LeonardNemoysHead 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago
You're not going to perfectly stabilize the camera in the interior reference frame, though.
[–]Chetic 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
In the future we can have ion thruster addons instead of tripods :)
[–]pineconez 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
Sadly, ion thrusters don't really work in an atmosphere. :/
[–]yotz 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
You'd think that, but they typically use loc-line brackets or bogen arms to mount still and video cameras to the inside of the station.
[–]IlikePez 21 points22 points23 points 1 month ago
That's the hottest woman I've ever seen. She is in SPACE bitches. That's motherfucking hot.
[–]USAF503 11 points12 points13 points 1 month ago
I would love to be in SPACE bitches... I can't even get in normal bitches though :/
[–]IlikePez 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Space bitches probably want to vet DNA, as well they should. That just makes them more hot to me.
I don't have a shot, but I can still dream.
[–]XXLpeanuts 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Actually its quite the opposite of hot, more like absolute zero cool, although where she is will be an artificial pressurised atmosphere at a comfortable room temperature id imagine :D.
Edit: Its been over a year since i've had sex, i think i know why now.
[–]TacticalBananas 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago
Below her arm...it looks like another arm with a belt tied round the elbow. what is that
It's a head rest for people using the cupola for robotics ops.
[–]teetow 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I need to know this. I can't unsee it.
[–]W4ste 16 points17 points18 points 1 month ago
Now in wallpaper form! Bringing sexy back... WITH SCIENCE!
[–]rabidfurby 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
I'll be in my bunk (strapped down so I don't float away).
[–]goldenrod -4 points-3 points-2 points 1 month ago
zero-G spooge.
[–]batoutheartist 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
has not officially happened yet!
[–]feureau 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago*
Didn't they come up with sex-in-space suit?
They did: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2suit
[–]Pyro627 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago*
Did you get that from a chain E-mail?
Edit: I stand corrected. I was thinking of a fake chain email talking about NASA doing space sex experiments.
[–]feureau 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Actually, from reddit.
[–]batoutheartist 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
nope it was a suit to bring two together into close personal proximity which it did during the test, but there was no actual copulation... there was a porn that also proclaimed to do it in zero g/ micro gravity, but it is faked.
[–]jhnhines 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
How? They are up there for some time, how do they resist? I can't even go a full week with out raping myself.
note the word "OFFICIALLY" ...
[–]natranr 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
Is that River Song?
[–]singer_table 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/expeditions/expedition24/index.html
Here you can find more information about the Expedition, as well as Tracy Dyson's bio.
[–]quantumwork 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
I'm pretty sure that's River Song.
[–]iesvs 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I know this post has been up a while, and I keep seeing it, so I have to ask: These space photos always seem to have heavier noise than most. I know with the wrong camera settings even photos from the surface can turn out similarly. I'm just curious if that's an artifact of the space environment--cosmic rays and whatnot--rather than a camera limitation?
[–]futur1 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
she is attractive.
[–]WordsNotToLiveBy 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
AILF!
[–]MrDanger 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago
That picture is incredibly hot.
[–]mv46 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-118/hires/jsc2007e033311.jpg
[–]bwill323 -4 points-3 points-2 points 1 month ago
She can ride my rocket anyday.
[–]Twotest 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
Haha, it's funny because she never will!
[–]ChrisHernandez -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Three words : sex in space
[–]the_littlest_viking 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
...has got to be really messy.
[–]ChrisHernandez 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Oh wow the possibilities
[–]spz456 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
What a great photo.
[–]serosis 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I find it taxing to think they would not wear a more comfortable style of pants. Or perhaps just wear pajamas constantly. You would think you would want something a bit stretchy that could let your body flex.
[–]Volte -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
"Ya know, I'm just chillin...... in my spacecraft"
[–]meetoohighlx 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
looks so peaceful
[–]Industrialisto 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Must be nice.
[–]bluenoser613 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Awesome shot. Do you need to "lean" on an elbow in microgravity? The pose makes the shot more realistic though.
[–]the_crumbling_temple -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Dat earth.
[–]Minifig81 -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Dat Zero-G.
[–]Yorikor -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Should have made a duckface. Highest flying duck ever.
[–]obscure123456789 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
The first space pin-up.
[–]Qbertoh 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Dat Astronaut
[–]green__plastic -7 points-6 points-5 points 1 month ago
For those saying this picture is "hot", I find that insulting. This is a stunning picture and shouldn't be boiled down to the sexual appeal of it. This picture is seriously just stunning. A beautiful scene, a beautiful person, totally awe-inspiring to know one of our own kind can hover above us all and watch from below. To merely point out your sexual satisfaction from the image is just humiliating to me. Just my two cents.
[–]whothehellispat2 6 points7 points8 points 1 month ago
The beauty of this picture has been established hundreds of times in the past. Its accepted that this is a profound image symbolizing how far we have come as a species, and the significance of a human being achieving such a perspective on the earth is obvious.
This being said, that chick is fucking sexy.
[–]Mr-You 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
it's been established that that woman has done something none of us will, many times before, so now it's morally okay to reduce her to a "hot chick"
[–]whothehellispat2 -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
One perspective does not negate the other.
No matter what significance this photograph might hold, it doesn't have to spoil the fact that this woman is an incredibly sexy individual.
[–]Mr-You 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
yet I haven't seen a single thing in this thread concerning who she is, and what she brought to the program. Yet I've seen plenty "she's hot".
[–]green__plastic 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
You are entitled to believe that, and I am entitled to believe that calling her sexy is treating her as means to and end. To summarize all her accomplishments in a way that satisfies only YOUR needs is morally wrong, to me. It belittles everything she has worked for.
I understand that you believe you can appreciate all her accomplishments and find THAT sexy (the fact that she has accomplished so much), but such a mindset is what drives many women to believe they are only viewed as sexual objects. That no matter how much they succeed in life, men will only appreciate them for how much they can please them sexually. If you find that you can't stop sexualizing women, fine; but to blurt it out is damaging the women who are listening. It seems best to keep it to yourself, for the sake of everyone involved.
[–]jpw1510 -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Oh shut up, some people are attractive and some are not, she is clearly attractive.
[–]green__plastic 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I'm not arguing that in the slightest. I'm just saying that pointing that out is really inappropriate for this discussion and subreddit. And if you disagree, that's fine with me, "freedom of speech" or what have ya, but I have the right to express criticism for those who bring up something so superficial.
[–]AD-Edge 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
I agree with you for the most part, but if your looking for respectable and mature comments on (of all places) the internet, then your setting yourself up for dissapointment. If the image has any sexual level to it (or even none at all), its going to be getting comments like that. That doesnt mean its right in any way of course, we just have to live with it unfortunetly.
Instead of being insulted, post how you feel about it, Im sure others will agree and some intellegent discussion might come of it, rather than a topic being drowned with uninspiring comments
This picture is seriously just stunning. A beautiful scene, a beautiful person, totally awe-inspiring to know one of our own kind can hover above us all and watch from below.
I believe I have the right to be both insulted and understanding that many people have yet to understand the over-sexulization of women. That's why I posted my comment; to incite discussion and to state my position on it.
[–][deleted] 1 month ago
[deleted]
[–]green__plastic 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
Eh, something happened. I got a response outta you. And several other people. And someone else who seemed to agree with me joined in. You can't exactly claim nothing happens.
:|
[–]teetow 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
"Merely?" You seem to be making assumptions here. Couldn't it simply be that some people see a beautiful scene, a beautiful person, and a totally awe-inspiring insight -- and get turned on by it?
[–]green__plastic -2 points-1 points0 points 1 month ago
Generally speaking, when a person is in a position where she has accomplished many things- say, being an astronaut, hovering in space, spending years training for the moment, etc- to only remark on her appearance is generally considered objectification. And most people find objectification to be bad. I'm not trying to censor anyone; you guys can say whatever you want (as can I)- so I say that to only comment on something as superficial as a person's appearance in a photograph that clearly isn't purposely intended to elicit sexual responses... well... that makes the person spouting those things sound gross, to me. Everyone's entitled to believe how they will- but one who can not recognize the time and place to admit sexual desires is not one I want to converse with. It's in bad taste and makes many (women) feel uncomfortable and belittled.
[–]teetow 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I understand why you would see it that way, I'm just pointing out that intelligence, determination and success can be not only admirable, but very desirable. I'm not saying you're wrong about objectification, I'm challenging your assumption that the woman in the picture is being "reduced" to just her appearance.
On the contrary, I'd say it's those exact aspects of the her -- that she's bound to be very intelligent, knowing that she's worked hard and has succeeded, looking out over one of the most stunning vistas in the universe -- that are likely to evoke attraction, especially in geeky guys. Just sayin'.
[–]green__plastic -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
I'll respond with an argument I made to someone else's reply, seem it seems fitting here:
You are entitled to believe that, and I am entitled to believe that calling her sexy is treating her as means to and end. To summarize all her accomplishments in a way that satisfies only YOUR needs is morally wrong, to me. It belittles everything she has worked for. I understand that you believe you can appreciate all her accomplishments and find THAT sexy (the fact that she has accomplished so much), but such a mindset is what drives many women to believe they are only viewed as sexual objects. That no matter how much they succeed in life, men will only appreciate them for how much they can please them sexually. If you find that you can't stop sexualizing women, fine; but to blurt it out is damaging the women who are listening. It seems best to keep it to yourself, for the sake of everyone involved.
[–]teetow -2 points-1 points0 points 1 month ago
I think we're well past the point of "agree to disagree." It's regrettable that you feel this way, though.
Sure, it's regrettable that when I see a woman who has accomplished more in her lifetime than I ever will, I don't automatically think, "damn, she sure is fit to please my penis!!!!!"
Yeah, really regrettable.
edit and of course the equally non-regrettable, "Wow, she sure has accomplished tons in her life. What character! What intelligence! What stunning accomplishments! Now that's surely fit to please my penis!"
See, that one is clearly not regrettable because I'm acknowledging that she's skilled... even though those skills, at the end of the day, only apply to making my wiener happy. Right? ...Right?
That has absolutely nothing to do with what we've been discussing. I'm bowing out now.
[–]green__plastic 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
I don't see how it doesn't pertain but I won't pester you anymore.
[–]ThePeenDream 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I think you'll find that if you replace the backdrop with, say, an office cubicle, nobody would be commenting on how "hot" she is (not that she isn't an attractive woman in the first place).
It's the fact that she's in such an alien environment, doing something that probably none of us will ever have the chance to do in our lifetime. I mean, there's nothing inherently sexy about her pose or the clothes she's wearing. You can just tell she's got a nice figure and a cute face. But regardless, that's where the attraction comes from.
Well, that and the first thing that pops into most males heads is probably "space sex" followed by their imaginations going on a wild tangent.
I would actually not suppose that- go to r/pics and look at any picture that happens to have a woman in it. I guarantee you that there will be comments suggesting how hot the woman is, despite the mundane picture. I don't even feel compelled to go find an example because it's so easy. If you persist I guess I will.
I know the attraction comes from the fact that we can derive a lot about her personality from the picture- she obviously likes space; I like space! She obviously is smart; I like intelligence! She obviously is in shape; I like people concerned with their health! But to still be so egocentric- to only consider the picture in the way that it pleases YOU, is degrading to her- to not be fully selfless when expressing gratitude for her work seems... well, selfish, obviously. I know most people won't find it to be a huge deal, but they also aren't in a position where they've accomplished a HUGE feat and have to witness people only enjoying it for the sexual aspects.
[–]ThePeenDream -4 points-3 points-2 points 1 month ago
Sorry, but you can't say what is and isn't degrading to her. She might get off on the fact that random people on the internet find her super attractive. She might not. But you sure as hell can't use that as an argument. I bet she doesn't even give a fuck because, well, she's been in space and has more important things to worry about and look forward to... or am I assuming too much here?
[–]green__plastic 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
You're right- I can't speak on her behalf. However, I can rightfully address how women are much more sexualized (at least in America) than men are, and I can rightfully assume that this over-sexualization of one gender is damaging to gender equality; therefore, I'm not exactly speaking on her behalf. She may love the sexual comments, true. But if she does, I would assume she could give up having the pleasure of hearing those comments to support gender equality- no over sexualization of one gender.
[–]o00oo00oo00o 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Welcome to Planet Earth! Please enjoy your stay here... please try to figure out and enjoy our local customs. They can be hilarious and loads of fun.
Welcome to Planet Earth! Nothing will ever change, no one is allowed to complain, people will only care about sex and beauty above science and wonder forever and it will be fun for those who are not constantly hurt/belittled by it. Please enjoy your stay here!
[–]hatperigee 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Why does she need to rest her head on her right arm? There's no (or very little) gravity
[–]szilard 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago*
If I recall correctly, she said it was awkward to pose for this picture, as she kept floating off.
[–]hatperigee 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Where did you hear/read that?
[–]szilard 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
It think it might have been an io9 or gizmodo article. But reddit does not like those sites, so I didn't mention it earlier. I can't seem to find the source yet though.
[–]BuickTime 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Makes sense. Look at her left arm, it's flexed and pushing her against the bulkhead. She's trying really hard to look relaxed.
[–]Rockran 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
She doesn't, it's purely for show.
If you look at her hip, most of her isn't even in contact with the window.
[–]TaskForceDANGER 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
This picture is what makes me realize I couldn't be an effective astronaut. I'd sit in that observation bubble and never leave.
[–]hett -2 points-1 points0 points 1 month ago
I want to get stoned there.
[–]CheesusDairyMessiah -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
The only time it's okay to take a self shot.
[–]LeonardNemoysHead -2 points-1 points0 points 1 month ago
Nice photo, but I can't look past how you can't prop your head up like that in zero g. I'm being a pedant.
[–]Archaeodokely 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
It also might be difficult to have your clothes and hair float in normal gravity...
all it takes is a username and password
create account
is it really that easy? only one way to find out...
already have an account and just want to login?
login
[–]Angus99 51 points52 points53 points ago
[–]ricodued 38 points39 points40 points ago
[–]Asytra 29 points30 points31 points ago
[–]alteron808 43 points44 points45 points ago
[–]Sieziggy 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]ITJUSTGOTREAL1403 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]The_Music 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]rsayers 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ITJUSTGOTREAL1403 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]dlpwillywonka 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Real_Muthsera 42 points43 points44 points ago
[–]Great_Gig_In_The_Sky 25 points26 points27 points ago
[–]cynognathus 63 points64 points65 points ago
[–]feureau 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]red_nuts 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]SanityClaus 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]TheMetalMatt 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]alexgmcm 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]DukeBerith 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]nicecrispybacon 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Solomon_Gunn 11 points12 points13 points ago
[–]feureau 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Davesbeard 12 points13 points14 points ago
[–]Markulatura 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]SplodeyDope 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]wildcard1992 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]ricodued 29 points30 points31 points ago
[–]LeonardNemoysHead 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]Chetic 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]pineconez 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]yotz 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]IlikePez 21 points22 points23 points ago
[–]USAF503 11 points12 points13 points ago
[–]IlikePez 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]XXLpeanuts 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]TacticalBananas 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]yotz 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]teetow 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]W4ste 16 points17 points18 points ago
[–]rabidfurby 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]goldenrod -4 points-3 points-2 points ago
[–]batoutheartist 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]feureau 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Pyro627 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]feureau 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]batoutheartist 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]jhnhines 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]batoutheartist 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]natranr 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]singer_table 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]quantumwork 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]iesvs 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]futur1 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]WordsNotToLiveBy 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]MrDanger 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]mv46 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]bwill323 -4 points-3 points-2 points ago
[–]Twotest 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]ChrisHernandez -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]the_littlest_viking 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]ChrisHernandez 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]spz456 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]serosis 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Volte -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]meetoohighlx 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Industrialisto 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]bluenoser613 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]the_crumbling_temple -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Minifig81 -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Yorikor -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]obscure123456789 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Qbertoh 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]hatperigee 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]szilard 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]hatperigee 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]szilard 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]BuickTime 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Rockran 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]TaskForceDANGER 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]hett -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]CheesusDairyMessiah -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]LeonardNemoysHead -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]Archaeodokely 2 points3 points4 points ago