use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g.reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, community...
902 users here now
Help Atheist Organizations! The Secular Student Alliance, Camp Quest, and Foundation Beyond Belief were all nominated for the Chase Community Giving program, which awards grants based on the votes of the public. Everyone gets 2 votes on Facebook, plus an additional one if they share a CCG page. The links for them are: SSA | CQ | FBB Voting runs from September 6-19
The Secular Student Alliance, Camp Quest, and Foundation Beyond Belief were all nominated for the Chase Community Giving program, which awards grants based on the votes of the public. Everyone gets 2 votes on Facebook, plus an additional one if they share a CCG page. The links for them are:
SSA | CQ | FBB
Voting runs from September 6-19
Welcome to r/atheism, the web's largest atheist forum. All topics related to atheism, agnosticism and secular living are welcome here. Please read our FAQ.
Recommended reading and viewing
Thank you notes
Related Subreddits <--the big list
Chat: #reddit-atheism on irc.freenode.net
Watch: #/r/atheism on reddit.tv
Read The FAQ
Submit Rage Comic
Submit Facebook Chat
Submit Meme
Submit Something Else
reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›
My gay friend's response to Chick-fil-a "Appreciation Day" (FB post) (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 month ago by ZeroGSpaceCow
[–]Pamander 37 points38 points39 points 1 month ago
http://www.owldolatrous.com/?p=288 It's a long ass read but it perfectly sums it all up and i HIGHLY suggest reading it. <3
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 31 points32 points33 points 1 month ago
I just read through it. Very good post. This quote really rang true for me, and it was the reason I posted this FB screenshot in the first place:
Why? Well, because I believe in equality for all people, that’s why. But also, personally, from the bottom of my heart: because you are my friend, and I don’t willingly support people who harm you for just being you. How could I? How could I, really? But, more importantly for our purposes, how could you?
Before I saw my friend's post, I was still on the fence about the whole boycott thing. I wasn't sure it really mattered. But, after seeing what he wrote, I realized that someone I care about is being hurt by all of this, and I can't just sit on the sidelines.
[–]kfphysics 7 points8 points9 points 1 month ago
You just gave me chills. Right in the feel.
[–]misterfanwank 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I feel that chill, bro.
[–]Pamander 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
Thank you i'm glad you read it. (I didn't write it) But it means alot to me I'm sure your friend is lucky to have you.
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
Shit, I'm lucky to have him! He's one of the groomsmen in my upcoming wedding. Just sucks that he wouldn't be able have his own, at least not in this state.
[–]otaku-o_o 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
You know, I've been thinking about this for a while. As far as I can tell, the whole issue with gay marriage is that we (gay couples) want the same government privileges (insurance/tax benefits) that straight couples have. So for a solution, we could give the same government rights to all couples without calling the legal binding contract "marriage." Everyone gets the same rights, the separation of church and state is strengthened, and individual churches/religions could still have "marriages" between whoever they deem fit.
[–]booosterseat 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
Breakthrough
This is basically what a civil union was supposed to accomplish. Unfortunately, it's a lot easier to get married than it is to get a civil union.
[–]otaku-o_o 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
True... I'm just saying that it might be easier to basically make the current government marriage system available to everyone, but just change the name to "civil union" or something. As far as government records and benefits go, all official couples would be called civil unions, and "marriages" would just be in unofficial church records or whatever.
Am I making any sense? Eh, just trying not to dig myself into a hole here.
Yeah, I agree with you. I think most people do.
[–]Hounmlayn 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Basically, have marriages mean nothing in terms of taxes and benofits, and people should get a civil union AS WELL AS a marriage? I believe this should be a good step. It makes everyone equal, and will give gay couple a better sense of equality without having to deal with silly religious people.
[–]otaku-o_o 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
yup. Government would only keep track of civil unions, and only churches would keep records of who is married.
[–]WD40cleans 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
As a Christian who is pro traditional family, I have been waiting for so long to find this. I could not put into words how great that would be, to settle all of the drama. I couldn't put into words, because I'm an ignorant Christian.
[–]Pamander 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Progress one step at a time hopefully in the future you can be his groomsmen :D
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Yep! I am convinced that it won't even be an issue anymore soon enough. I just can't see the opposition to gay marriage holding out much longer, there just aren't any good reasons to be against it.
Tell me about it.. by the way if you have any office things you may need or accessories to tech or whatever you should shop at office depot they are donating so and so portion of sales (i forget how much) to lady gagas born this way fund. You should really check it out. It's pissing the fundies off saying its making teens gay etc.
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Cool, thanks for the information! I know the company I work for orders supplies from Staples, but if I buy stuff personally I'll keep that in mind.
[–]WhiteMike504 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
So you're saying boycott office max? Jk I didn't know that about office depot though. I was wondering yesterday if any big companies were openly pro gay marriage. I think popeyes should support gay marriage because, well it is fucking delicious and I need an excuse to eat there more.
[–]Pamander 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
http://gawker.com/5930964/john-goodman-stars-as-colonel-sanders-in-a-pro+gay-ad-for-kfc here watch this lol
[–]WD40cleans -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
What about all of the people who are being hurt by all of these "pro-gay" rallies? Oh that's right, no one cares about them.
[–]_scoundrel_ 10 points11 points12 points 1 month ago
I've desperately been trying to say something to this effect, and haven't been nearly as eloquent:
This isn’t about mutual tolerance because there’s nothing mutual about it. If we agree to disagree on this issue, you walk away a full member of this society and I don’t. There is no “live and let live” on this issue because Dan Cathy is spending millions to very specifically NOT let me live. I’m not trying to do that to him. Asking for “mutual tolerance” on this like running up to a bully beating a kid to death on the playground and scolding them both for not getting along. I’m not trying to dissolve Mr. Cathy’s marriage or make his sex illegal. I’m not trying to make him a second-class citizen, or get him killed. He’s doing that to me, folks; I’m just fighting back.
Asking for “mutual tolerance” on this like running up to a bully beating a kid to death on the playground and scolding them both for not getting along. I’m not trying to dissolve Mr. Cathy’s marriage or make his sex illegal. I’m not trying to make him a second-class citizen, or get him killed. He’s doing that to me, folks; I’m just fighting back.
Glad to see you've found a way to voice it :)
[–]Cavi_ 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
This is very well written. Clear and succinct, very much worth the read, regardless of your stance on the issue.
Indeed it wouldn't hurt if everyone read it. Even if it didn't completely change anyones minds at least just let them see why it effects us so much. (UCK my f key ell odf)
[–]DrMuffinPHD 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Great post.
[–]kbillly 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
A few of my gay friends still eat at chick fil a. They think this boycott is absurd. To each their own though. They are tough mo fo's and have been through a lot. You don't tell them what to do, and they do what they want. I'm proud of them for not jumping on the current boycott circlejerk of the week.
Did you read the entire article? Just curious.
Edit: Kinda sounds like i'm being condescending or something not sure.. Just a question wasn't meant to imply anything.
[–]kbillly 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Yeah I read the article and I think it's great! Just not everyone agrees or sees it the same way as the author in the article.
Yeah i know thats the point of the article. You may not see it the same way he does but atleast understand where the other sides coming from you know?
[–]WD40cleans 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
That's the type of gay people I like to hear about.
[–]799646 108 points109 points110 points 1 month ago
So I'm thinking Chick-Fil-A flashmob where everyone's goes into their restaurant and suddenly rips off trench coats to reveal rainbow/spandex for an orange mocha frappaccino fight
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 95 points96 points97 points 1 month ago
This will make them angrier than you think.
I used to work with a seriously homophobic guy. Like, the kind that rants for hours about how disgusting the gays are. I, as a joke one day, said I was going to find a couple of gay prostitutes on Craiglists, and hire them to do the nasty on his front lawn. He absolutely flipped his shit, stormed out of work, saying he was going to kill me and my whole family.
Very strange. Funny enough though, apparently he supports gay rights now.
[–]Ari159 63 points64 points65 points 1 month ago
That kind of response out of him makes me think he is a self loathing gay. As the old saying goes, you hate in others what you hate in yourself.
Yeah, I considered that too. But, I don't think that's the case. I'm pretty sure he is straight. I think he was just a really angry person who didn't know how to control his emotions.
[–]Phallic 38 points39 points40 points 1 month ago
He needed to put a dick in his mouth and just chill the fuck out, by the sound of things.
[–]geaw 20 points21 points22 points 1 month ago
I would love it if dick sucking became something that wasn't shameful/an insult and was more like pot smoking - something you do to chill out. "hey man your ego is getting a little out of hand lately. Maybe you should suck a dick or something."
[–]The_Humungus 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
TIL user geaw is actually this guy.
[–]BongoPhone 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
I have used that exact line more times than I'll admit, even on the internet.
[–]quik366 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
but dont you gays have gaydars to help track down members of your own kind? even know I am a straight man, im still jealous of this ability
I'm not gay... The FB post was my friend's.
[–]quik366 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
ahhhhhhhhhhhh i must be stoned, sorry. oh and good for your friend for posting that, it takes balls. I personally believe everybody should have equal rights and Christians (similar to exploding diarrhea) like to spam there beliefs onto everybody
Yup, definitely.
[–]SpruceCaboose 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
The whole gaydar thing is so misunderstood. It just "works" because people in a subculture are better than those not in the subculture in identifying others who are "like them". You tend to give off subtle clues and those in the subculture catch and notice them while others miss or ignore it as unimportant.
You can get a similar phenomenon with a pot smoker. They will generally pretty accurately point out the people who smoke pot around you, for an example I have watched first hand.
EDIT: Just saw your other post, and if you meant stoned like a smoker, I assure you the analogy was coincidence.
[–]quik366 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
holy shit this is actually a great analogy, thank you. I can spot somebody that smokes 100 yards away. I guess because I am in podunk alabama and most gay people here are very secretive about their lifestyle (in fear of redneck attacks). Its naturally hard for me to pick up on gay people because they dont reflect in anyway that they are gay.
[–]SpruceCaboose 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
It's like the whole "Do you smoke?" "Do I smoke what?" A stoner knows right there what is up, others just assume you mean cigars or cigarettes.
And no worries. I was trying to come up with an analogy for a while and that seemed the most straight forward. When I saw your reply about being stoned I knew it was fate.
[–]Sloppy1sts 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Straight people can have gaydar, too.
maybe your only born with this ability?
[–]FreeTopher 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
Like American Beauty!
[–]799646 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
Hahaha i guess it worked then
[–]CandleJaxx 7 points8 points9 points 1 month ago
Funny enough though, apparently he supports gay rights now.
not funny actually, I bet you'll find he himself is a closeted homosexual and was lashing out at the rest of the community because he didn't know how to cope with being gay himself.
It's pretty common.
[–]BUT_OP_WILL_DELIVER 12 points13 points14 points 1 month ago
There was actually a study about this. They picked a mixture of homophobic and non-homophobic men and strapped a device to their penis that measured erectile blood flow and then showed them gay porn. The most homophobic were generally more closet homosexual than those who weren't. Although in my opinion, if you allow a stranger to handle and strap things to your penis whilst showing you gay porn, you're probably gay.
[–]vfxDan 13 points14 points15 points 1 month ago
That's not really a definitive test or anything, most people could get aroused accidentally watching any kind of porn. The penis is one weird motherfucker.
[–]BCP27 12 points13 points14 points 1 month ago
The number of times I've had to yell, "NO! That's a bad penis! We don't find that attractive in any way!" is much higher than I care to admit.
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 7 points8 points9 points 1 month ago
This is true. They really can't be trusted.
[–]tehblister 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
Here you go. This is the study:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014
Maybe, but see my other reply in the other comment above. I don't really think that is the case with him.
[–]Zakams 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
How the hell did that happen?
I really don't know...
He had a kid, and has mellowed out a lot since then. That could have something to do with it.
[–]case-o-nuts 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
He was probably afraid that he'd get turned on.
Maybe so. That would be very embarrassing for a homophobic person.
[–]case-o-nuts 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
well... yeah.
That was a risky click.
[–]gmick 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Nothing makes ignorant people angrier than someone pointing out their ignorance.
[–]j-fromnj 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
flashmobs are cool, gay or straight don't matter.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
even http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_mob_robbery
[–]NDWolfwood5268 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago
Except the restaurants are owned locally and the local business owners aren't necessarily of the same mind as the corporate masters behind them.
[–]phozee 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
They choose to open a CFA as opposed to any other restaurant. Nobody is forcing their hand.
Just to play Devil's Advocate, if you opened a Chick-fil-A a few years back, and the CEO just recently spoke out about this whole thing, would you sell your business and bail over it? Seems a lot less cut and dry that way.
[–]phozee 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Their stance has been a known thing by many (including myself) for years. Dan Cathy just recently reiterated his views. I'd say if you're opening a business of any kind you should probably do some research first.
Prior, the stance was hinted at, but never publicly stated the way he did in January. In January, he unequivocally put his stance forward and made it very clear. Before, it was vague and less defined.
[–]rjhall90 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
New plan: Flash mob Headquarters instead.
[–]NDWolfwood5268 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
That's more like it.
[–][deleted] 1 month ago
[deleted]
[–]NDWolfwood5268 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I didn't say not to boycott them. Your money gets used by corporate HQ which, IIRC, uses it to fund the anti-gay movement. For that reason I don't spend cash there (and there's no location near me), but I'm saying the hostility towards individual outlets and owners isn't necessarily called for.
And I don't think that's a safe limb to climb out on considering there's no correlation between fried chicken and religion. Until recently, religion probably wasn't even really a factor for them.
No problem. Yeah, I just want people to not brand all CFA employees as asshats because of what the parent company says/does. Same thing with Hobby Lobby, really.
Kinda sad the flash mob idea seems to be getting as many upvotes/support as it is...
[–]799646 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Yea I know. It's not to bash the owners, they're just doing their job.
[–]payne6 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I don't know why you are being downvoted these are how franchises work. Not all chickfila's are evil. They are locally owned.
[–]katerhoades 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago*
just go have a kiss-in
Would do this
[–]Elephant_on_Stilts 9 points10 points11 points 1 month ago
As a straight man this post chills me to the bone. I'm very aware of the hot issue of gay rights but never in my life has it been more humanized than in this post. I've always seen it as a heated argument, here we can see its more than that. It makes me ashamed to say i'm on the same side of the line as the straight people who are buying their way into heaven 1500 calories at a time. Being able to see the absolute terror of being persecuted for harming no one and doing nothing wrong speaks loudly.
I'm straight and i'm middle class, I'm and atheist, and a democrat, I'm tech saavy and 29, im not married and have no kids but I'm in a very commited relationship, I believe in pro-choice and I support gay rights. I'm part of a group of people who are in the middle, who are never really intimidated, and I can honestly say that there is nothing that scares me more than being lumped in the same group of people as those that make good people like this man feel this way. The thought that I am intimidating simply because i'm straight makes me feel like a lesser person.
tldr; as a straight man who supports your rights, I am so, so sorry for the way people with my sexual orientation treat you. As a human race we should all be better than this...
That was a nice post! I've told my friend (the one whose FB post is in the picture) about this being on Reddit, and all the support he's getting. So, maybe he'll see your comment, I hope he does!
[–]jellopez 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago
thank your friend for these words. i was having trouble articulating how it made me feel but this says it perfectly.
[–]byuu 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago
For me it was Prop 8. I live in Ohio, but realizing that not even (arguably) the most progressive state in the nation could uphold such a basic fairness really just destroyed me inside.
Hard to describe, felt like a 50lb weight inside my chest. Lasted a good week or two. Wasn't even just the marriage issue, but just the complete loss of faith in democracy and human compassion.
(My partner and I were never big on involving government in our lives, but we went and got married in Connecticut after that.)
But one thing about these experiences is that you quickly build a tolerance. I saw the CFA crowd here yesterday ... didn't surprise me at all, it was only a minor annoyance in that they were blocking traffic.
Wasn't even just the marriage issue, but just the complete loss of faith in democracy and human compassion.
Yeah, the marriage thing is really a symbol of discrimination, more than anything else. Or at least that's the way it seems to me.
[–]Autumnrayne84 42 points43 points44 points 1 month ago
I really want to shake his fucking hand. It's reasons like with the Chick-fil-a thing that good people kill themselves... Shame, fear, and self doubt. Your friend says "Fuck You" to adversity... A hero among pretty men.
[–]DEFY_member 19 points20 points21 points 1 month ago
A hero among pretty men.
Not sure if you meant that or not, but it's hilarious.
[–]Untergangsbeobachter 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
They are closed-minded idiots. Remember that the other half of the country (at least) supports gay marriage, and this percentage is going to rise as the bigots die.
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
I agree. But, we live in the South, and it's still very much a serious debate here. I can definitely see how seeing all the support for Chick-Fil-A would affect him.
[–]Iamchrisbrown209 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I don't know that "at least" half the country supports gay marriage. I live in liberal ass California and even they voted against it.
[–]Itstheway1 7 points8 points9 points 1 month ago
I was raised in Orange County California and I was so shocked to find out how many of the people I grew up with are against same-gender marriage. I mean, it makes sense. Orange County is really conservative as a whole. Still, I never thought people actually cared about what other people do with their lives. I mean... From what I understand, republicans only care about their money. They don't want higher taxes because... Well, fuck anyone who can't support themselves. I know this is hardly what a republican is, but it always made sense to me. To see so many people saying on FB to go to CFA and support the cause made me wonder why NOW they care about what other people do. I don't have hate for anti-gay believers. In the end, I truly believe they will know they were wrong. I respect their choice, but what I don't understand is why the life of others in on their mind. If... Let's say, they believe it's a sin, then fuck it. Why would they care if another woman or man goes to hell for their sins. I mean... I know I don't want to hang out in heaven with a bunch of bigots. I'm not gay, but I'd rather enjoy the thoughts of many over the one single idea that many people have. As a first generation Mexican adult in this country, I know I wouldn't like my "group" of people discriminated against or have organization against my people funded by large companies. I'd say gay/lesbian community you have my support, but I don't even like the sound of that. So I'll say this, my friends... You have my support and I'd hug any of you for 24 hours in support of any equal rights cause.
[–]bearsinthesea 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
Gays could change all this, and it confuses me that they don't. About 10% of the population is gay, yes? And many elections are decided on thin margins with few voters. If every gay person voted, it would change govt at every level.
And yet I know a gay man that is strongly republican. He also can't afford health care, but hates the new health care laws.
Now I know that being gay doesn't have to be the defining trait of a person. But if politicians were making laws targeting me, I'd vote against them.
[–]pheasantplucker92 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago
Hi, gay here.
It's unclear exactly what percentage of the population is gay/queer, since the amount of response bias when asked about sexual orientation fluctuates greatly over time (depending on how willing a population is to be forthcoming both to a survey of this sort and to themselves). Therefore, achieving unity of the gay vote is a much more difficult feat than achieving unity of the black vote, for example, where no one is in denial of their race (I hope) and there is already a strong cultural unity to build upon.
To many, issues of gay marriage are simply not as important to them as other issues (Gore Vidal, for example, opposed pro-gay marriage legislation because he didn't like marriage to begin with). It's just as frustrating to me as it is to you that some gays throw their lot in with those who would limit their civil rights. Here's a good quote from last Sunday's episode of The Newsroom by fictional adviser to Rick Santorum, Sutton Wall, a conservative who is both black and gay, that might help you understand a possible mindset of gay conservatives:
“Stop! Just stop. I believe in the sanctity of life! And if that word is too vague for you, then look it up. I support the Senator because, of all the candidates in the field, I believe he is the only one whose passion on the issue of abortion equals my own, and I believe he has the skills to make a fantastic President. And I believe he has— YOU WILL NOT INTERRUPT ME AGAIN, SIR! I am more than one thing. How dare you reduce me to the color of my skin or my sexual orientation? There are people who look just like me, thousands and thousands, who die for the freedom to define their own lives for themselves. How dare you presume to decide what I should think is important? Yes. When it comes to equality for the gay community, Senator Santorum is wrong. But I am far more insulted by your high-handed implication that I need your protection. SHUT UP. I’ll let you know when I’m finished! I came on this program because Rick Santorum believes that the right to kill an unborn child is not inalienable. And I stand with Rick Santorum, and I stand with the Catholic Church. I am not defined by my blackness.I am not defined by my gayness. And if that doesn’t fit your narrow-minded expectation of who I’m supposed to be, I don’t give a damn, because I’m not defined by you either. So get this through your head: I don’t need your help.”
“Stop! Just stop. I believe in the sanctity of life! And if that word is too vague for you, then look it up. I support the Senator because, of all the candidates in the field, I believe he is the only one whose passion on the issue of abortion equals my own, and I believe he has the skills to make a fantastic President. And I believe he has—
YOU WILL NOT INTERRUPT ME AGAIN, SIR!
I am more than one thing. How dare you reduce me to the color of my skin or my sexual orientation? There are people who look just like me, thousands and thousands, who die for the freedom to define their own lives for themselves. How dare you presume to decide what I should think is important? Yes. When it comes to equality for the gay community, Senator Santorum is wrong. But I am far more insulted by your high-handed implication that I need your protection.
SHUT UP. I’ll let you know when I’m finished!
I came on this program because Rick Santorum believes that the right to kill an unborn child is not inalienable. And I stand with Rick Santorum, and I stand with the Catholic Church. I am not defined by my blackness.I am not defined by my gayness. And if that doesn’t fit your narrow-minded expectation of who I’m supposed to be, I don’t give a damn, because I’m not defined by you either. So get this through your head:
I don’t need your help.”
[–]bearsinthesea 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
I never thought about this, but maybe gays don't really have big problems with the govt. I assume that if someone proposed a law saying all gays must get an arm tattoo, the community could come together to fight it.
But perhaps this marriage issue isn't that important. Fewer people are getting married than ever before. Some gays don't even want marriage (as you pointed out). All in all, that's pretty good news for gays. If this is our biggest problem, and we aren't that worried about it, it means perhaps fighting for gay rights worked, and is mostly done.
[–]pheasantplucker92 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago*
Agreed on all counts. I'm not pissed at all about gays not being able to get married; marriage IS sacred, as it is by definition a religious institution, with a whole lot of mystical significance as well as legal significance. Gays who claim to practice a religion like Islam or Christianity and truly believe in that religion are just as illogical as other sinners within that same religion. Why they would care about getting married in the eyes of that religion defies rational thought.
I am, however, pissed off that the legal extension of marriage, civil union, exclusively applies to a man and a woman in many states. It is not a question of love, or of religion, but of law. Rather, what I am mad about is that a man and woman are able to join forces and gain certain legal protections and benefits that two men or two women cannot. It's insanity. The "love is love" argument is a way to garner votes through emotional appeal for a more factually based, legal argument: that as a unit, two men or two women have the same rights as a man and a woman.
[–]PraiseBeToScience 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago*
No, marriage is not by definition a religious institution. The origins of marriage are a bit fuzzy and different depending on the culture as it originated multiple places independently. One thing is clear, it was not started by religion. Religion co-opted what formed naturally in society for it's own purposes.
The fact that marriage had multiple independent origins is evidence that it serves a basic need of humans for social structure. Bonding with mates or other members of a species is also not a trait that is unique to humans, so it's a behavior that has evolutionary, not mystical nor legal roots.
I am an atheist married to another atheist, there is nothing religious about it and it's certainly more than just a legal arrangement. If there were no such legal arrangement, and the only way to get married was by religious ceremony, we would still find a way or word to communicate the importance we are to each other.
I know couples that refuse to get married because they don't agree with it for one reason or another, I ask then why not just call yourselves friends? The response I get back is that they are more than just friends. To be clear I'm not trying to push them into marriage or convince then it's something they need to do, it just comes up in normal conversation. I don't believe people as a rule should get married, its something we all must decide for ourselves.
The coupling that the legal arrangement of marriage is meant to support is far more than just securing extra rights or establishing a religious preference. It supports a behavior that is a basic human need and desire. To have it reduced to "love is love" just to garner votes through emotional appeal is a bit shortsighted.
[–]pheasantplucker92 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago*
We're talking about two different types of marriage here. You're talking about loving monogamy, and its recognition within your social circle. And you're correct in saying that that does not have religious roots. "We are monogamous lovers" doesn't have nearly the same ring to it as "We're married", haha. However, I will admit that my definition of marriage in my previous comment was unclear.
I was referring to marriage before a god, as most religious institutions define it. A civil union is simply a more semantically palatable phrase for marriage as it was originally conceived, to be sure, so what would have been closer to my intended meaning is "marriage before a god" in the place of marriage. That is why I may have come across as flippant when I said that it is explicitly and obviously religious, especially considering that religious gays want to be able to get married in a church or synagogue.
Today, marriage is an expression of love as well as an agreement of union. And it is the love connection that is being appealed to. I don't find it shortsighted at all that the campaign to grant gays the right to marry is based chiefly on the idea that love between two people of the same sex is inferior to love between two of the opposite sex; the idea makes sense, and has greater impact with voters, so I support it.
Make no mistake, though: the truly important debate is not about having god, church, or community recognize your monogamy, or your love. Like you said, no one could recognize it, and the two of you could still have a relationship that by all considerations a marriage. The true problem is that certain rights are attached with that recognition, rights that gays and lesbians are still deprived of when they should be protected by the 15th 14th Amendment.
[–]PraiseBeToScience 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I believe both the social and legal arguments are equally important. It's important that LGBT relationships be accepted socially as hetero relationships are. The social stigma of LGBT relationships is the source of the problem to begin with. Those discriminating laws didn't appear out of thin air, and any victories on the legal front may be short lived if there is a massive social backlash. Thankfully, I think we've reached a point that the social backlash that does happen will be nowhere near the size required to erase the victories achieved lately for equality.
I do agree that the legal battle should be the focus at this point. Not only are LGBT couple entitled to those same legal protections and the lack of those protections are causing real measurable harm every single day, but having real LGBT marriages in society will force people to come face to face with their beliefs. Familiarity breeds fairness.
But if LGBT couples are finally successful in getting married in the places as their friends and families (even if it's still churches and synagogues when that happens), we will finally have achieved the true social equality that LGBTs so rightly deserve. We will finally have put this long struggle behind us for good.
rights that gays and lesbians are still deprived of when they should be protected by the 15th Amendment.
I believe you meant the 14th. At least that's what Prop 8 and Loving v Virginia rested on.
[–]pheasantplucker92 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Ah, 14th is right. I put that one first, but hesitated and was too proud to use Google :) I always mix up the Reconstruction amendments!
The government cannot change the sentiment of people who view LGBT relationships as bad by passing a law to allow those relationships to be consummated in places of worship. Sure, gays should be allowed to marry any place that a straight couple can get married. Whether it is the government's right to force organized religions to recognize those unions is a totally different debate.
It would be an interesting court case to see whether a gay marriage could be allowed by the government to take place on an altar without the church recognizing it as a marriage before god (here is an interesting article regarding the Catholic Church's policy on non-mass uses for churches).
Sorry if I wasn't clear, I was in no way arguing for the government to force churches to marry people. I was saying that once LGBT are allowed to get married legally, than many people will be faced with it in a very real way. I believe most of them will become familiar with it, and naturally on their own terms drop their opposition to it.
As far as getting married at the altar, this was using social change to make this happen, not governmental. (i.e. we the people living our lives having our own debates and affecting policies of our own private organizations.)
Now in the case of property owned by a Church that has absolutely no religious use whatsoever (and there is a TON of that, like parks and commercial properties) they should fall under the same laws and regulations that any business with a storefront to the general public. The Church's domain should only be in the church. I have a serious problem with tax exempt organizations owning for-profit entities and not paying tax or use of any other privileges that non-profits have over for-profit organizations, but that's an entirely different debate.
I agree that legalizing gay marriage would make gay marriages more publicly accessible, but I have doubts about whether that accessibility would do more to change people's sentiments about it than social change.
[–]WHM-6R 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Like 3%-5% of the population is gay. We're kind of seriously outnumbered by the 30% or so of the population that are evangelical Christians. We really have absolutely no power to enact any sort of social change in a democracy without a huge number of straight people agreeing with us and as the Chick-Fil-A debacle has demonstrated a huge number of supposedly pro-gay straight people will completely change their political views for a fucking sandwich.
[–]bearsinthesea 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
In many elections the turn out is ~35%. I only 3% of the population is gay, but they all voted, they'd be 10% of the voters, which I bet money could turn elections.
[–]Levy_Wilson 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago*
You know what the most ironic thing in the world is about these "Christians"? If they really did read and follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, then they would not be trying to restrict the rights of others. They would not be attacking others on their sexual orientation. They would be real Christians and let people be as they are and they won't be filled with hate. Do these delusional people really think Jesus would give two shits if two men or two women love each other when there are people dying of starvation in more than half of the world and people are killing each other for political gain left and right in the Middle East and Africa? If these people had thinking minds of their own, they would get their fucking priorities straight. That's a big IF, though.
These people aren't Christian's protecting "Christian Ideals". They are bigoted homophobes and nothing more.
[–]JMCrown 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Modern American "Christianity" has almost NOTHING to do with the teachings of Christ. It has been twisted and perverted into a social/political platform that defines itself based on what and who it's against, rather than celebrating qualities of the human spirit that actually bring humans closer together.
I'm atheist so as far as I'm concerned, let the fundies have Christianity. Let them wallow in their hatred all they want. If you traditional Christians have a problem with it then you need to step up and take back your religion.
[–]Levy_Wilson -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
I'm not Christian for that reason. I've just made the observation, along with some examples from a discussion with a fundamental Christian friend of mine who is an actual follower of Jesus's teachings. He has told me he does not agree with homosexuality, which means he will not take part in it himself. He has no desire to deny anything to anyone. (This is a man who believes dragons are in every culture because humans lived alongside dinosaurs.)
In my eyes, if more fundamental Christians were like him and just kept to themselves about their beliefs and just followed the Bible's teachings and stories with their own lives and didn't try to push it on others, the world would be a better place.
[–]Grizdango 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago
Just go there and cause a scene about how they should "go after the niggers again next", get it on TV. Might wake some people up.
[–]jheregpip[] 24 points25 points26 points 1 month ago
Only in 'Murica is a pilgrimage taken by car and ends at a fast food restaurant.
[–]goldflakes 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago
Muhammad went to Mecca because this guy there had the best fucking shawarma.
[–]iRun800 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
That was awesome. YOU GO GLEN COCO!
[–]emiffer321 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
Tell your friend that instead of going out to eat at Chick-fil-a, I donated $20 to the Trevor project. I think he will find the majority supports him and his right to get married. You can't please everyone.
[–]jpurdy 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
This is the fundamentalist political organization that Dan Cathy supports - http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups/family-research-council
[–]epicsaxophone 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
It truly makes me sad to see that stuff like this still exists in America. Why do people hate gay people so much? Why do Christians continue to use the bible to justify discrimination against gays? Why are they so narrow minded?
Sorry for my rant. It's such a shame that gays will probably not have have equal rights (for a long time) because of close-mined people.
[–]Liberteez 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
She's conflating support of tradtional marriage and/or free speech/rejectiion of thuggish speech shut-down with people viewing her as "lesser". As an individual she has the same worth and dignity and rights as anyone.
If marriage as it has always been is obsolete, make the case- but there is a case for not knocking it off its moorings, and treating the importance of what opposite pairs do naturaly as no different than what same sex couples do. It is different and managing the one with law has different importance than the latter.
There are exactly zero people in the US who can decide to marry any person. And no one is barred from marrying an unrelated, competent, consenting adult of opposite sex, so long as no fraud is committed. I submit to you that Many people who are attracted to the same sex have married, had kids, and loved their spouses and built lives with them.
Changing the definition of marriage removes connection to the only reason it exists in the first place. It isn't a connection of two souls before the world assembled. It's a legal contract between man and woman and state that is supposed to limit the adverse consequences of the natural results of human procreation, while advancing advantages to all parties and any issue produced by the union.
If these reasons are now obsolete, "we can control fertility, tests reveal paternity, procreation no longer needs intensive control" make the case. But that's the case you have to make, not that your love is as worthy or deep or long lasting. Of course it is.
I just hope everyone recognizes that the restaurant's views (?? didn't realize companies had or should have personal views on social issues, but whatever) and support for the restaurant are free speech,
Equal and as free as any other free speech
like boycotting and chastising the restaurant, condemning their views.
This is actually a pretty opportune situation to sit back and observe the division on the social issue
But point being, both sides are equally free to express themselves in these ways. I encourage a boycott.
[–]upvotemeorurracist 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
Imagine a world in which homosexuals are prideful of being themselves no matter what others think! <3
[–]noveltyimitator 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Am I the only one who thinks this Chick-Fil-A thing is blown out of proportions?
It's not even the stance on sexual orientation of a fast food chain, but the sexual orientation stance of the owner of a fast food chain, that happens to have made his view public, and both conservatives and liberals on this issue went berserk.
I don't understand how much more polarized America can be. We happen to be in a recession, with a worsening case of oligarchy in our government, and a developing conflict in the Midddle East. And we chose to celebrate civic rights by eating/not eating fast food chicken.
Posterity will look upon us and laugh.
I thought so too, until I saw my friend's post, which is why I posted it here. I figured it provided perspective on the issues.
It's not even the stance on sexual orientation of a fast food chain, but the sexual orientation stance of the owner of a fast food chain, that happens to have made his view public
Keep in mind that the money people spend at Chick-Fil-A goes towards funding organizations which are anti-gay, and lobby to discriminate against gay people.
We happen to be in a recession, with a worsening case of oligarchy in our government, and a developing conflict in the Midddle East.
I care about other issues too, but that doesn't mean I can't find room to care about this one.
[–]TChuff 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I wonder how he feels today knowing that Chik Fil A sponsors and builds foster homes for children. Supporting Chik Fil A supports good...no great causes.
[–]Svx_blue 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago*
I've been watching for days, with immense sadness welling up within me as hour after hour friends and family whom I have deep love for chime in on Facebook with blatant hate and disregard for humanity. All the while they hide behind the guise of their religion. (I'll leave it up to those who read this to guess which one.)
I'm not gay, but I'm an atheist and I now know that my friends and family look down on both groups with equal disdain. And that they consider both groups getting married to be offensive.
What is causing the sadness is the fact that no matter what adversity that I face as an atheist - it is nothing compared to what the L.G.B.T. community has/is/will gone/going/go through and there is nothing that I can do about it that would be particularly effective.
There is no other time do I feel like the speck of dust in the universe that I am as when I see how oppressed a people are and I know that all I can do as an individual is pledge my support to them.
Good post. As atheists, I think we feel a certain empathy towards them that is unique to us.
[–]samzayvan 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago
the difference is you can fuck a guy in the ass every day and be fine.
But if you ate Chick Fil A every day you'd die of a heart attack in a year's time.
so gay's win
[–]Squalor- 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
Your gay friend seems very level headed.
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 8 points9 points10 points 1 month ago
He is. I only point put "gay" in the title because it was relevant. I kind felt weird about it, and thought about leaving it out. But, it wouldn't have been as clear.
[–]redditshredit 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
Acknowledging sexual preference isn't discrimatory. Gay people aren't the same as heterosexual people, because they DO face discrimation every day of their lives. What is wrong is when we don't acknowledge the challenges they face.
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 5 points6 points7 points 1 month ago
I agree. I just didn't want come across as one of those people who, when introducing him to other people, says "hey, this is my gay friend Jake." But, obviously, it was relevant to the post, so I decided to go ahead and say it that way.
[–]tocka9999 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I never really got those ads. Is it so bad to use a(n) descriptive adjective?
[–]ezmobee_work 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
This makes me sad.
[–]jad316 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
As a christian let me say, they are wrong. Not for the stance of standing for what they believe but because the only knowledge they have of christianity is what they hear from friends and family. Most Christians don't really read the bible. They just do as they are told.
[–]NikKnack 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago*
I think your gay friend should consider that a lot of the people there had ZERO idea about what's going on politically, or don't care, and just like really good chicken.
Not everyone's life revolves around political issues. Things aren't as gloomy as he thinks.
That would be true, except they had about 10x as many customers as usual, who were there solely to show their support for Chick-fil-a.
[–]insomnic 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Showing support for a Chik-fil-a location doesn't necessarily mean support for a particular political standpoint ... maybe they just wanted to show they'll still eat there because they like the food and don't care about the political issues.
There are many people who are in the "Cult of Chik-fil-a" that have no interest or care about their standpoints and are already a bit crazy fanatical about the place just because of the chicken sandwiches.
Just offering a perspective.
[–]NikKnack 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
They just called it "Chick-fil-a Appreciation Day". Not "Chick-Fil-A Hates Gay People Day". So unless you really pay attention to gay rights, you would just think it was a day to show how much you love their food.
Truth be told, I bet even out of the people who did know, a lot of them just didn't give a shit one way or the other. A lot of people aren't opposed to gay marriage but also don't care about it either.
To assume this was some sort of hate demonstration is pretty ridiculous.
Yes, some people there WERE there for hate reasons, but I bet it wasn't even half.
[–]irrationalsapien 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
Man, my conservative coworker came in the other day, and said I'll buy you lunch at chick-fil-a. I thought to myself, "OK, I am pro-gay marriage and pro-equal rights generally. However, I am also pro-free-sandwich. Not to mention, I heard this company treats their employees really well, so fuck it, I'll go."
I then took the trip to chick-fil-a with her. I literally felt dirty. All these sweet old ladies were there to support the place. This guy with a "don't tread on me' t-shirt was taking pictures of everyone standing in line. (which thankfully I avoided). The place was packed.
I kept thinking, that it was absolutely ridiculous that this many people were anti-gay marriage and they were going to show it by going to a fast food chicken place because the CEO was anti-gay marriage. Then, I got back and discovered the company had funneled all this money to anti-gay groups... and I literally felt a little sick.
Fortunately, I didn't directly give any money to the place and the chicken sandwich wasn't good enough for me to throw away my values and willfully wallow in the throes of chicken addiction.
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 22 points23 points24 points 1 month ago
You have no idea how many people I know who I thought were cool, but it turns out they're anti-gay. All of these people came out of the woodwork to show their support for Chick-fil-a, and I had no idea what kind of people they were before that.
[–]IronymarkJ 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
better sooner than later.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
I think that a lot of people are viewing this not as opposing gay marriage, but as supporting "freedom of speech", but apparently telling people they are saying stupid offensive shit isn't allowed any more.
[–]He11razor 4 points5 points6 points 1 month ago
Not just "freedom of speech" but a lot of people are seeing this as an attack on religious freedom. That's the way it's being framed by people like Huckabee.
Absolutely.
To an extent I can understand their position. I certainly don't think it is right for people to say that Chik-fil-a must remain silent on the issue. I really don't think it is hate-speech. Saying you "support traditional marriage" is about the most tame anti-gay statement a person can make. Almost akin to "those inner-city youth make me uncomfortable".
I would like to say it is just fucking retarded to take this particular stance on this particular issue, but look. People are flocking to Chik-fil-a because they took this stance. I don't see it much different from JCPenny putting some gays in a flyer to get some business.
Having said that I wont be eating Chik-fil-a because I don't want to support a company that is donating money to organisations actively campaigning against something I believe in. It's not like it's the only friend fucking chicken place, I live in goddamn Georgia.
[–]KAggie13 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I still haven't figured out how it's an attack on religious freedom. I know you're right about that being their position as I've heard it said myself, but I cannot figure out in what way these people are being violated. They're still free to practice what they believe, just not allowed to trample others that they feel "uncomfortable" with. Fuck that. If Christians believe they have the right to be married, then they need to deal with it being an across the board right, not selectively applied. They keep flashing the Constitutional "Freedom of Religion" but fail to understand the fact that rights in a just society need to be universally applied.
[–]tinysparrow 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I feel the same. I had no idea either, until I visited my FB page and saw SO many posts of "I just ate at Chick-fil-a and I think I'll go there again, and the day after." I'm having a harder time accepting that than I thought, because I think it's just tasteless celebrating something that favors taking anyone's rights away (or preventing them from getting them in the first place).
[–]MeloJelo 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I'm not really sure why people think that a CEO holding an opinion doesn't lead to said person contributing money to organizations that support his views . . .?
[–]micebrainsareyummy 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
From what I understand, some of the money given to anti-gay groups was actually company money not money directly out of his paycheck.
[–]irrationalsapien 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Right. It obviously does, and makes boycotting the restaurant totally justifiable.
[–]lepuma 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I would totally "like" his comment.
Me too. In fact, I totally did!
[–]austinmo2 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
I posted something similar on my Facebook. You know hatred and ignorance is there, but to see it displayed on this massive scale, it unexpectedly hurts a lot. All the mean comments on Facebook and reading about the hateful things people were saying to employees about gays makes me really sad and angry. I feel bad for the employees, many of them young, some of them gay. This will be very traumatic for them.
Equal rights has been made part of the election. It has been added to the democratic platform. This kind of vitriol is why it has not been part of the platform before. I have to give credit to the democrats and the president for taking this on and not kicking the can down the road again.
I also have to credit Mayor Gavin Newsom who had a big hand in getting the ball rolling in 2004. I think we can expect a lot more backlash throughout the election.I'm gonna need some thicker skin to make it through all this.
The scale and the openness of the hatred has gotten to me. and seeing a family member and a family friend show support for chik-fil-a. That hurt a lot.
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago
Yeah, I think that's the thing that bothered him (and consequently me) the most: seeing your "friends," family, and community supporting Chick-fil-a. It's like they're spitting in his face, and the lines of cars outside of CFA just show him how much of the community doesn't accept him as an equal.
[–]srathek 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Some people who are supporting Chick-fil-a do it for their right to express free speech, and they support that, but view homosexuals as equivalent human beings.
Their right to free speech wasn't in jeopardy.
[–]skewedlife 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I'd have to agree with this. Hardly anyone with enough intelligence and ambition to stand up for free speech will go out of their way to support a business with such negative motivations.
We collectively get to make choices as to who will succeed financially off of our society. God knows we fail pretty fucking badly at it, but this one should be simple. There's nothing anti-free speech about it.
Seems like the LGBT did something I didn't read about or everyone's losing it.
[–]TheShadyCat 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago
As a heterosexual European, with all this Chick-fill-a stuff going around, i must say: i'd rather eat a dick than a sandwich there. Anyone else feel the same?
[–]anjewthebearjew 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago*
Guess what though? If the LGBT movement hadn't pushed so hard against chik-fil-a this would've never happened. You did it to yourself, check that shit out.
Edit: spelling
[–]insomnic 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
You'd be better off presenting your case yourself instead of telling others to go find it... it's your argument to prove not others to refute.
[–]PTstripper_i_do_hair -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
It still astonishes me that this shit is taking place in the supposedly most free country in the world. To quote Bill Hicks, I wish my parents had've fucked in Europe.
[–]CGord -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Please convey my best wishes to your friend.
[–]chmilz -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Gays and gay supporters need to start going into Chick-Fil-A in massive numbers and ordering the cheapest thing on the menu, then sit around loudly talking about crazy homosexual things in loud voices. I mean, seriously take that shit over. Company is profiting regardless, may as well make them feel awkward about it and drive their bigot customers underground.
[–]Mitsuji -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
I can't believe all the people going to Chick-Fil-A. The one near me still has a full parking lot and drive through. I don't understand why one man's opinion on institutionalized marriage is such a big deal and I think that's why there's been this big backlash. I support his right to have an opinion on marriage and it has nothing to do with hating homosexuals, but allowing people to be human and having their own little opinions. Who is this man? Why do we give this man so much power? Do you think there aren't other people in the world of business with this political opinion? There could be a hundred other companies with founders or CEOs who don't support gay marriage and we're not protesting them. It just so happens someone got a hold of his opinion and had a total freak out and now it's this big, exaggerated gay hate.
I'm bisexual and I don't take this to be an attack on me. People's political opinions on marriage don't offend me all that much, but then I think the marriage license did have it's roots in a sexist and religious culture as its original purpose was to determine the rights of the woman in the marriage. I think government marriage should be done away with and I wouldn't submit myself to a legal marriage anyway (so maybe I don't get the point.) Whatever help and breaks the government gives married people ought to go to people who really need it like single parents.
I'm sorry this is challenging some gay people's confidence, but, again, I don't think this should be taken as homophobic movement. People are getting fed up with politics and people overreacting. If there hadn't been this huge overreaction to the founder's comments there'd be no backlash, no one would've even heard about it and no one would care.
[–]ReverendHerby -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Well, Chick-fil-a customers, enjoy celebrating how not-gay you are by gathering together to fill your mouths with cock-sandwiches.
[–]WingedNinja -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
Like his status for me, please?
[–]Byeka -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
My thoughts regarding this piss poor form of "appreciation day". Retweet anyone? https://twitter.com/jholowka/status/231117355122569216
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
pro-life? apparently not when it comes to poultry that's caged its entire life.
[–]whitestboyalive00 -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
gay
[–]2joker1 -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
i'm gay and...dammit. i need a minute
[–]woodchuck64 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Heartfelt sympathies to your friend: take courage in the fact that many more in America support you than do not.
Chick-fil-A demonstrates the smallest of small American minds, ignorant of nuanced issues, devoid of empathy for anyone not white, Christian and straight, and living lives of self-imposed fear and misery.
[–]verit4s 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I suspect the root of the problem is that chick-fil-a is too delicious. Buying fried chicken is a convenient way to prove your strong convictions to the world...
That might be true. If it was somewhere less delicious, like Church's, it probably wouldn't have been an issue. That would have been way easier to boycott.
[–]ussr577 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
At my local Chic-fil-a there was a gathering. 3 homosexuals were injured in a riot. This is not a religion of love! This is a sick cult solemnly based on hate!
[–]palalab 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Would you deliver a simple message to your friend please?
There are more of "us" (gay marriage supporters as well as gays) than there are of "them," we just don't usually squawk as loud. There is a whole huge network of people who are down for the cause and who would do much to support the cause of your friend, and all gays.
Yeah, I think so too. Especially among the demographics that aren't currently in nursing homes.
But, we live in the South, and anti-gay people are still very much a large portion of the population here, and they aren't afraid to yell about it.
[–]stuckinscandi 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Sucks to be him, I don't buy his facade though, doubt he'll feel better tomorrow
[–]youthoughtiwasdead 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
...and all you dumb fucks who snorted all that chikin are gonna be half a pound FATTER.
[–]Krohn744 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
As an atheist and having no serious issues with homosexuality, I have a serious issue with people attacking Chick-Fil-A. Since when are we surprised that Christians do not believe in gay marriage. Since when is it ok to attack a religion. Homosexuals complain about freedom and now they are attacking a religion..Hypocrits much.... Chick-Fil-A didn't refuse to serve gays, one of their founders expressed his beliefs when asked. Move on gay community, you are only hurting yourself by trying to attack religious views.
I sort of agreed with this before. Everyone knew CFA was a Christian company before (they're closed on Sundays after all).
But, when this whole debacle got into the news, it came out that they donate money to anti-gay organizations. So, that is an issue for concern.
[–]Gmoney613 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
BUT!! just hear me out..... what if he woke up the next day, and was no longer gay? WHAT IF PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!
[–]orion12 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Don't mind me, just cutting onions here...
[–]TabesL 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
As a guy who spent 24 years repressing my sexuality, is currently in the process of coming out, lives in Oklahoma and who used to love Chick-fil-a...I gotta say it did suck hearing about the wait times at every Chick-fil-a yesterday. On top of all that, my coworkers couldn't stop talking about it today. I now hate Chick-fil-a. But its not gonna change what I'm doing or what I've learned about myself.
Yeah, I think seeing all the support for CFA from friends, family, and the community was the real downer.
[–]fegd 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Yea, like those people care about your friend and his issues.
That's the point...
[–]MrImmoli 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
I just thought of something. Most likely there is some kid out there still in the closet whose parents decided "Hey, lets eat at Chik-Fil-A today."
I cannot imagine how that would feel.
Oh, definitely. That has got to be horrible.
[–]itsamericasfault 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Your gay friend it taking it too personally. Keep in mind that Chick-fil-a sandwiches are really good.
Your gay friend it taking it too personally
That's the point, he's taking it personally after seeing some of his friends and family supporting CFA.
Keep in mind that Chick-fil-a sandwiches are really good.
Yes, yes they are.
[–]rowens72 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Over-sensitive gay ppl and over-zealous Christians...
[–]ianhewtt 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Sweet dude
[–]Mist29 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I feel like the point of this Chick-fil-a protest was lost on a lot of people. For 90% of people I know, it was an exercise in the freedom of speech, carried out because of the violent reaction to the business' statement
it was an exercise in the freedom of speech,
You can exercise your freedom of speech in a lot of ways without support a company that actively tries to deny gay people rights.
carried out because of the violent reaction to the business' statement
Violent? Violent how?
Chick-fil-a stores and their private owners don't discriminate based on sexual orientation, so boycotting them makes no sense. As Mr. Truett said, his stance was a personal one, not guideline for his business. Besides, the company does a lot of charity work and gives scholarships to their employees for college, so it's obvious people would come to support them when so many people are against them.
And by violent I didn't mean physically, but how quickly and harshly the public reacted to the news. If you need proof, look at any news website, facebook feed, or r/ Atheism.
Chick-fil-a stores and their private owners don't discriminate based on sexual orientation, so boycotting them makes no sense
But they donate money to organizations that are anti-gay, and work to further that agenda. So boycotting makes sense.
Even if that wasn't the case, boycotting a company run by a CEO who disagrees with giving gay people equal rights would make sense.
But boycotting individual stores hurts the owners and the people who work there, both of whom have no stake in the argument. There is very little chance of the boycott doing serious damage to the company, but it will definitely cause problems for employees.
And if we were to boycott against every company run by a morally questionable CEO, no one would buy anything from anyone.
There is very little chance of the boycott doing serious damage to the company, but it will definitely cause problems for employees.
Maybe not, but it's better than supporting a company which supports a cause that you disagree with.
Possibly. Honestly, I don't think companies or CEOs should even get involved in partisan issues, just from a business standpoint. I wouldn't say most companies are morally questionable, at least not in such obvious ways. It's bad for business. But, I may be too optimistic about that.
[–]bunnysuitman 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
I'm sorry for your friend but the reality is very clear...they have chicken.
[–]The_Real_Muffin_Man 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Okay, This is it. I could make a post about this but I'm just going to do it here. I'm going to get downvotes like crazy for this but it has to be said. This whole Chic-fi-la hates gays crap is getting way out of hand. Quite frankly it's just ignorant.
"We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that." THAT IS ALL HE SAID. Do you see anywhere in that statement that he hates gay people? Do You see anywhere in that statement that he discriminates against them? He didn't even state that he opposes it! Of course he does, however. But there is nothing even remotely wrong with that. It's simply one man's opinion, the key word being OPINION. The man is entitled to his own opinion right? Or at least I thought he was until he was attacked by every single gay activist in the country. I'm appalled at how they are treating the situation. Claiming that he "hates" gay people. Any true Christian knows that hate is a sin. Christians are called to love. Christians can love gay people believe it or not. In fact, it's what the Bible calls them to do. Has Chic-fi-la closed the doors to gay people? Are they no longer allowing them to eat there? Of course not! They want them there! When it comes down to it, Chic-fi-la is a fast food restaurant. PERIOD. Who gives a crap what their opinions are on gay marriage?
So one CEO opposes it? Do you really think all the gay people are out there going "Well darn, if chic-fi-la opposes gay marriage then I guess I can't be happy with the person I love and marry them." Of course they aren't because that would be stupid. But they're treating it like that is the case anyway. And it's stupid. IT's a fast food restaurant for crying out loud! So I guess I should go up to every single place I do business at and ask them their opinions on issues that don't even matter. I could care less what McDonald's or Wendy's thinks about gay marriage, or abortion, or who should win the Superbowl. None of the stuff matters to me, and it shouldn't matter to anyone else. All that matters is that they make quality products at reasonable prices. That is it. Whether you agree with me or not, I just really had to get this out of my system.
And as a side note: People, gay or not, shouldn't be surprised by Chic-fi-la's stance on this issue at all. They are a very Christian company who have based their company on Biblical principles since day one. They aren't even open on Sundays for crying out loud! People shouldn't have been surprised by this at all.
[–]rmc330 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago
Why are all these chick-fil-a posts in atheism? you fuckin morons
[–]BreadyMurphy 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
As a vegetarian atheist liberal who strongly supports gays rights I have an unsurprisingly negative opinion about chik-fill-a.
[–]The_New_Usual -1 points0 points1 point 1 month ago
I got downvoted in another thread for admonishing people who were proud of eating chic-fil-a. It's pathetic that people can't give up something as simple as a chicken sandwich from ONE restaurant.
[–]SexualTerrorist 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago
Since when was this r/faggot? I'm an atheist and I hate queers, they're just disgusting. If you're straight and so obsessed about "gay rights", you must be a closet faggot yourself.
all it takes is a username and password
create account
is it really that easy? only one way to find out...
already have an account and just want to login?
login
[–]Pamander 37 points38 points39 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 31 points32 points33 points ago
[–]kfphysics 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]misterfanwank 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Pamander 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]otaku-o_o 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]booosterseat 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]otaku-o_o 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Hounmlayn 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]otaku-o_o 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]WD40cleans 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Pamander 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Pamander 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]WhiteMike504 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Pamander 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]WD40cleans -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]_scoundrel_ 10 points11 points12 points ago
[–]Pamander 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Cavi_ 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Pamander 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]DrMuffinPHD 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]kbillly 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Pamander 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]kbillly 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Pamander 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]WD40cleans 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]799646 108 points109 points110 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 95 points96 points97 points ago
[–]Ari159 63 points64 points65 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 31 points32 points33 points ago
[–]Phallic 38 points39 points40 points ago
[–]geaw 20 points21 points22 points ago
[–]The_Humungus 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]BongoPhone 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]quik366 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]quik366 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]SpruceCaboose 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]quik366 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]SpruceCaboose 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Sloppy1sts 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]quik366 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]FreeTopher 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]799646 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]CandleJaxx 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]BUT_OP_WILL_DELIVER 12 points13 points14 points ago
[–]vfxDan 13 points14 points15 points ago
[–]BCP27 12 points13 points14 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]tehblister 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Zakams 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]case-o-nuts 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]case-o-nuts 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]gmick 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]j-fromnj 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]NDWolfwood5268 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]phozee 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]SpruceCaboose 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]phozee 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]SpruceCaboose 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]rjhall90 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]NDWolfwood5268 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] ago
[–]NDWolfwood5268 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] ago
[–]NDWolfwood5268 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]799646 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]payne6 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]katerhoades 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]799646 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Elephant_on_Stilts 9 points10 points11 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]jellopez 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]byuu 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]Autumnrayne84 42 points43 points44 points ago
[–]DEFY_member 19 points20 points21 points ago
[–]Untergangsbeobachter 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]Iamchrisbrown209 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Itstheway1 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]bearsinthesea 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]pheasantplucker92 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]bearsinthesea 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]pheasantplucker92 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]PraiseBeToScience 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]pheasantplucker92 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]PraiseBeToScience 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]pheasantplucker92 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]PraiseBeToScience 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]pheasantplucker92 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]WHM-6R 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]bearsinthesea 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Levy_Wilson 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]JMCrown 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Levy_Wilson -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Grizdango 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]jheregpip[
] 24 points25 points26 points ago
[–]goldflakes 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]iRun800 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]emiffer321 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]jpurdy 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]epicsaxophone 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Liberteez 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]upvotemeorurracist 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]noveltyimitator 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]TChuff 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Svx_blue 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]samzayvan 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]Squalor- 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]redditshredit 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]tocka9999 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ezmobee_work 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]jad316 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]NikKnack 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]insomnic 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]NikKnack 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]irrationalsapien 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 22 points23 points24 points ago
[–]IronymarkJ 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]He11razor 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]KAggie13 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]tinysparrow 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]MeloJelo 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]micebrainsareyummy 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]irrationalsapien 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]lepuma 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]austinmo2 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]srathek 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]skewedlife 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]TheShadyCat 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]anjewthebearjew 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]insomnic 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] ago
[–]PTstripper_i_do_hair -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]CGord -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]chmilz -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Mitsuji -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]ReverendHerby -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]WingedNinja -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Byeka -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]whitestboyalive00 -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]2joker1 -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]woodchuck64 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]verit4s 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ussr577 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]palalab 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]stuckinscandi 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]youthoughtiwasdead 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Krohn744 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Gmoney613 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]orion12 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]TabesL 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]fegd 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]MrImmoli 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]itsamericasfault 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]rowens72 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ianhewtt 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Mist29 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Mist29 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Mist29 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ZeroGSpaceCow[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]bunnysuitman 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]The_Real_Muffin_Man 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]rmc330 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]BreadyMurphy 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]The_New_Usual -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]SexualTerrorist 0 points1 point2 points ago