this post was submitted on
1,834 points (59% like it)
5,735 up votes 3,901 down votes

gifs

unsubscribe334,774 readers

477 users here now

Kiva

Links to amusing, interesting, or funny .gifs from the web! .gif format submissions only, please!

How to make your own animated gifs?

Please try not to repost and post reaction gifs in /r/reactiongifs.

Direct image links preferred! Avoid pages that have other extraneous material besides the gif like headers, banners, ads, etc. And please, no blogspam. URL-shorteners are NOT allowed!

Witty titles optional. nsfw when necessary; this implies the comments within will be too.

NUDITY GOES IN /r/nsfw_gifs

MARK SEXY GIFS AND SERIOUS INJURIES NSFW
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL NOW BE REMOVED

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 178 comments

[–]vonMars 135 points136 points ago

Still my favorite Battlefield.

[–]JocksFearMe 39 points40 points ago

Yup. Along with Commander mode, serious squad players this was the shit.

[–]Kurayamino 29 points30 points ago

2142, squads got temporary unlocks for working together, you got them even faster if your squad was following commander orders.

Made almost everyone work together and actually pay attention to the commander, it was glorious. I had several builds that relied on squad unlocks and usually had them within 30 minutes in random pub games.

[–]pooper_macho 106 points107 points ago

Fuck me, I thought that was real! I'm definitely not a gamer anymore.

[–]Khalexus 6 points7 points ago

Urgh yeah I thought it was real until I came in here. Thought it was just horrendous video quality. But looking back at it, I didn't even notice anything outside from the plane (was looking at the plane too intently). Far too distracted to notice.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]alkhalicious 3 points4 points ago

Wow, at first I thought that was from image quality/shitty camera.

[–]pooper_macho 0 points1 point ago

You're right. It's pretty obvious. But I've been fooled by the image quality and my distraction.

[–]Genesis557 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, got me too, but now that I look at it, there's even a name above the plane.. xD

[–]jockejanne -4 points-3 points ago

I feel you man...

[–]red_280 12 points13 points ago

Damn straight. Battlefield 3 doesn't even come close.

[–]boobinator 2 points3 points ago

It does not , but BF3 is still fuckin amazing man.

[–]al0newestand 3 points4 points ago

Which one is this?

[–]iceclown132 5 points6 points ago

Battlefield 2

[–]BCBUDDHA 0 points1 point ago

except when you're on the deck of that carrier frustrated that all the vehicles are getting hogged so you turn malicious

[–]Tx3089 175 points176 points ago

No lie I thought this was real life footage...... I cringed a little. I did just finish watching the Helicopter Accident from Phoenix on the front page :/

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Tx3089 32 points33 points ago

The worst part about it is that I have seen this before. I have been fooled twice.

[–]nkanyiso 29 points30 points ago

Shame on you

[–]JeSuisNerd 20 points21 points ago

Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.

[–]gr8whtd0pe 4 points5 points ago

Ah. Good ol' George W Bush...

[–]whimsies 4 points5 points ago

But I thought you c-c-can't, can't get fooled again?!

[–]svenhoek86 1 point2 points ago

I figured it was some screw up and that he was about to be court marshaled and stripped down to less then airman. After I read Tx's comment, I went back and felt really foolish.

[–]Tx3089 0 points1 point ago

*laugh

[–]Jabullz 17 points18 points ago

Link?

[–]Tx3089 6 points7 points ago

Link to what? The Heli Crash? Sorry Im fairly new to Reddit. Be advised: No gore but very hard to watch. The post had a link to a Wiki Page so here is the link to the video.... Sorry if this is not what your asking for... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTIijI32vA0&feature=my_liked_videos&list=LL9tg5qZw0-nKjvyf4iDbPHg

[–]tampajim 3 points4 points ago

How many helicopters were following that car chase? They just keep cutting to another angle...

[–]DeskFlyer 0 points1 point ago

There were 5 helicopters following this chase, from different TV stations. The two involved in the midair belonged to KNXV and KTVK. Here's the Wikipedia link on the accident:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Phoenix_news_helicopter_collision

[–]Tx3089 0 points1 point ago

Sorry, I only know from what I saw on the video. Here is the Wiki Link from the Original post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Phoenix_news_helicopter_collision

[–]Jabullz 1 point2 points ago

Yeah dude this is the link I was lookin for. You can also put [brackets] around words and put the URL in (parenthesis) after the brackets. Like [this](example) and it will hyperlink the URL to the word.

[–]Tx3089 0 points1 point ago

Glad I helped. And thanks for the tip, that will help alot during my time here.

[–]aku42 2 points3 points ago

What is it then?

[–]moukou9 0 points1 point ago

WHAT?! It's not real?

[–]serosis 52 points53 points ago

Good old Battlefield 2, I really miss it.

[–]Roland1232 28 points29 points ago

Simply one of the most fun games I've ever played. I like BF3, but it lost a lot of that magic.

[–]chronoflect 23 points24 points ago

BF3 is good, but it is definitely missing the same charm that BF2 had.

[–]BigClifty 8 points9 points ago

The nostalgia nearly knocked me out of my chair.

[–]wazabi 0 points1 point ago

Wake island 2007.

[–]zeex 5 points6 points ago

[–]serosis 7 points8 points ago

Battlefield 3 is too linear, you can not just fuck around anymore which is what I loved to do besides being commander. Battlefield 2 was the last game I ever had fun with playing online.

[–]Megagun 2 points3 points ago

Interesting. I never played Battlefield 2, but I think Battlefield 3 is not linear enough. It just feels a bit too chaotic, and everyone is moving around without a real purpose. One of my most amazing BF3 moments was when in a random Conquest game (on Caspian border), at least 75% of my team rushed towards a single capture spot. There were other capture spots still under enemy control, but for some reason everyone decided to hit the same spot at the same time. Rush mode feels way more focused and intense when compared with Conquest, but not nearly as focused as rush mode in Battlefield: Bad Company 2.

Another issue I have with Battlefield 3's conquest mode is that it's hard for me to judge how my actions affected the game. I could be capturing a few flags, but I'll never really know in what way my actions affected the game: if I didn't capture that one flag, would we have lost instead of won? This is vastly different in Rush mode, where I can clearly assess my performance and actions, especially when attacking. I find it very satisfying to know that my actions or the actions of the squad I'm in have caused my team to win a round. This is also why I love Operation Metro in rush mode; it has a lot of variety and is all about personal contribution. The kind of close quarters combat you see in parts of Metro causes a lot of 1v1 standoffs, and when you play with a few friends a single squad pushing through enemy defenses can definitively make a huge impact on the rest of the game.

[–]RedAero 2 points3 points ago

Why do you miss it? Install it and go play...

[–]unohoo09 9 points10 points ago

They miss it because a lot of the gaming community that plays BF2 has left for newer games. I used to run a Sandbox (excellent construction mod) server, but I don't even bother these days because there's hardly anyone that plays.

[–]RedAero 3 points4 points ago

Well, duh the mods(except PR) are dead, but I'm fairly sure the vanilla servers occasionally fill up...

[–]unohoo09 4 points5 points ago

It's so sad. Sandbox, Nations At War, AIX, etc, were all so much fun ;~;

[–]RedAero 2 points3 points ago

Point of Existence... Man, I followed that mod through most of their BF:V career and all through BF2. Couple of the mods are on reddit, too.

[–]Slivilth 0 points1 point ago

I still play BF2 when boredom strikes, Panda Nation 64 players server in the UK is full for most of every day.

[–]AeroBlitz 1 point2 points ago

Oh man, I played hours of Sandbox at a time. That mod was so much fun. I built myself (an albeit terrible looking) aircraft carrier once.

[–]unohoo09 0 points1 point ago

A coder in the DGFS clan (some clan based in the Netherlands) made an addon that made it possible to spawn parts of the carrier itself (along with full buildings and such). It was really cool to have the gridsnap set way high and have a bunch of the tips of aircraft carriers reaching to the sky and having the rest of the carrier buried.

[–]Incursus 1 point2 points ago

The community is still active. Plenty of 64 player servers are still full these days. There is also Project Reality.

[–]Triptolemu5 1 point2 points ago

Well if its anything like my experience with bc2, Punkbuster won't let me. And with the massive cheating going on in bf3, I will not be buying bf4.

[–]Mrsoulofrock 188 points189 points ago

Goes to try this on grand theft auto: San Andreas, aaaand Carl is hospitalized.

[–][deleted] 84 points85 points ago

>Killed in horrific jet fighter explosion.

>Hospitalised and resusitated; chillin' back at the grove 8 hours later.

I fuckin' love GTA.

[–]Duramax159 56 points57 points ago

Goes on 3 hour long rampage murdering hundreds of police officers and Innocent civilians

Let out of police custody the same day

[–][deleted] 44 points45 points ago

>Being chased by cops

>Conjure up jetpack out of thin air and fly the fuck away

[–]DrRedApple 39 points40 points ago

Black Magic.

[–]SvenHudson 58 points59 points ago

Everything is about race with you.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]phyreseed 23 points24 points ago

Colorblind...

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Remikov 9 points10 points ago

comedy genius

[–]q1o2 7 points8 points ago

You're just stupid. It's okay.

[–]Color_Bars 0 points1 point ago

What is your name, Haley ?

[–]docblue 0 points1 point ago

Say what you will about Rosenberg, he's an amazing lawyer.

[–]Duramax159 -1 points0 points ago

My new phone's background. Excellent.

[–]mdoddr 8 points9 points ago

Jump up fully dressed!!! FUCKING RUNNING!!! Jump out the window!! you're okay. RUN!!! RUN!!! Punch a dude! SHOOT 'IM!!! KILL 'IM!! money. Steal a car! DRIVE THE FASTEST!!! DRIVE!!! FAST!!! head on collision!! SHOTGUN!!! There's Homer. There's Homer. Molotov. SPAWN TANK. DESTROY! CRUSH! KILL!

They should make it so the buildings blow up.

-a poem

[–]MiracleBlue 0 points1 point ago

Meth is a hell of a drug

GTA is a hell of a game.

[–]itsasillyplace 0 points1 point ago

how do you use the > without formatting for quote?

[–]DudeWheresMyQuran 1 point2 points ago

> test

\>

[–]itsasillyplace 0 points1 point ago

> thanks

[–]chris_vazquez1 9 points10 points ago

Fucking love the Hydra! I used to go into militarized zones JUST to get into dogfights.

[–]chrisc098 3 points4 points ago

My first play through I didn't see the message about turning the engines. I played the whole mission over and over with them vertical. I didn't find out you could turn them until I spawned one and was messing around.

[–]ZoomaBaresAll 3 points4 points ago

Dude, that shit is cake. All you have to do is not hit the damn ground, CJ.

[–]JaYbLeS68 2 points3 points ago

Get back in the house, Carl!!!!

[–]al0newestand 1 point2 points ago

You call him Carl?

[–]Zeitgeist420 106 points107 points ago

I can't say this with 100% certainty, but I believe that this aircraft could, in fact, perform this maneuver under the right circumstances. I do not, however, believe that a human pilot could achieve such a thing unless the avionics had been programmed for this particular maneuver.

I am an Aeronautical Engineer, and I have had a lengthy conversation with one of the lead engineers for this aircraft's propulsion system, though not specifically about this topic. I think the main issue is the transition time from split thrust fore/aft into full forward thrust. I know the clutch can disengage at that speed and that the second turbine shaft can spool up and unload the primary turbine in that time, but I'm unsure on the dynamic relationship between the two due to the unlikelihood that these performance parameters have ever been tested outside of a simulator.

Don't underestimate what an aircraft with a power to weight ratio of 1.5 can do. (P/W ratio with a very light fuel load) Anyways, none of this matters because no sane person would ever do this, but when I first saw this video online a long time ago I thought it was real, and actually an averted accident.

[–]ElAvestruz 40 points41 points ago

So. . .there's a chance.

[–]Slivilth 4 points5 points ago

One in a million

[–]CaptLudwig 4 points5 points ago

We have a million jets right? So let's do it.

[–]asshatnowhere 6 points7 points ago

its would require more space. similar maneuvers like this have been done before bit with way more 'falling' distance to let the aircraft slow down and change its velocity vector. search up SU-37 maneuverability to see something similar in action!

[–]Zeitgeist420 0 points1 point ago

With enough altitude any aircraft with thrust vectoring and greater than 1:1 power/weight ratio (this part is negotiable) can perform this maneuver.

[–]asshatnowhere 0 points1 point ago

basically yes, thrust vectoring would help greatly. some planes though, f-15 for example, are able to recover by themselves without thrust vectoring and pilot action, pretty cool i must say. other seem to just right them selves perfectly, like those air-race airplanes. with enough space anything is possible!! :P

[–]BrainSlurper 9 points10 points ago

find some surplus jet, put it in the desert with a suicidal pilot and you'll be surprised what happens.

[–]TylerDurdenisreal 6 points7 points ago

Eeeeh, no. The F-35 is a very expensive plane and the only reason this is even remotely possible is because of the aircraft's very specific STOVL build, making it the only plane capable of this feat. Other STOVL aircraft from previous fighter generations were built much differently and their thrust directioning is much different.

[–]BiggerLongerAndUncut 2 points3 points ago

In your professional opinion, if this is possible, then what do you think is the maximum time the plane could sustain that low upright hover?

[–]RayBoogs 2 points3 points ago

If you mean sitting on its tail, depends on the pilot and the Flight Management System. theoretically you could sit on the tail for a long while. In fact before the Harrier Jump Jet, the first and greatest VTOL aircraft, they tried to achieve a VTOL aircraft by using "tail sitters" where the aircraft would land and take off on its tail. Click. Obviously there are many pitfalls, like the pilot not knowing where the ground is when he's staring at the sky, and his massive control load.

So I imagine, not having worked on the f-35, that it could perform this maneuver, but I'm not sure for how long, it would depend on the stress put onto the engine and the pilot, and the ability for the engine to change its position that quickly.

[–]TylerDurdenisreal 1 point2 points ago

While is is a different aircraft, the F-22 (which the F-35 here is heavily based on) can tailsit indefinitely.

[–]Zeitgeist420 0 points1 point ago

The plane can sustain that hover until it runs out of fuel - the problem is that it can't hover like that fully loaded - I'm not even sure it can do it when it's full of fuel, but don't quote me on that - it's just been too long since I looked at any of these numbers.

[–]ShlawsonSays 5 points6 points ago

I am an Aeronautical Engineer, and I have had a lengthy conversation with one of the lead engineers for this aircraft's propulsion system, though not specifically about this topic.

With you so far

I think the main issue is the transition time from split thrust fore/aft into full forward thrust.

I think I get what you're saying...

I know the clutch can disengage at that speed and that the second turbine shaft can spool up and unload the primary turbine in that time, but I'm unsure on the dynamic relationship between the two due to the unlikelihood that these performance parameters have ever been tested outside of a simulator.

Oh. No I don't.

[–]Zeitgeist420 1 point2 points ago

I guess what I'm saying is that there are basically three things that need to happen for this aircraft to perform that maneuver, and one design condition that must be met:

Design condition: Power/Weight Ratio of ~1.2:1 I'm guessing would suffice, but this would need to be tested (important point there)

1: Nozzle has to go from 90 degrees down out to about 5degrees up within about 1/10th of a second, possibly more. If the nozzle is being used to increase the stability of the aircraft and provide control inputs this is probly something that it can do. Again, this must be tested even if the engineers can confirm that the nozzle can do this.

2: The clutch transferring power from the second turbine (in the back of the engine) through a long shaft out the front of the engine and into the front fan must be able to disengage nearly instantaneously and allow that second turbine to spool up

3: The second turbine must spool up and stabilize quickly in order to allow the engine to reclaim the power which was being transferred to the front tan. This must happen very quickly, as the engine is only operating with about 20,000lbf of thrust while the fan is on, but it needs all ~45,000lbf or so of it's thrust to power out like a rocket in a condition like that.

I am curious what thrust/weight ratio would be required to power out like shown in the video, but from what I've seen RC planes do I don't think it's a whole lot more than the 1.2:1 that I guessed.

Basically, the transition time from full downward thrust to full forward thrust has to happen really quickly, power transfer and spool rates must be very rapid, AND the aircraft has to remain stable in an incredibly unstable condition at that moment when it's basically just sitting upright in the air. The fist part is an engineering question outlined above but the second part I'm thinking would be attributable to luck alone.

I think the plane could do it maybe is all I'm saying.

[–]notcoolbrooo 1 point2 points ago

Doesn't the STOVL version of this aircraft have a second vertical "fan" that comes online during takeoff/landing? So technically this maneuver couldn't be attempted while in that hover mode unless that fan was shut off (thus making the hover impossible) and since none of the other variants have that (hover) capability you couldn't attempt the maneuver unless it is done while in forward motion? Or am I way off base here?

Do you work for Allison/Rolls by any chance?

[–]TylerDurdenisreal 0 points1 point ago

The secondary turbofan is separately powered IIRC making it capable of being on at the same time.

[–]Zeitgeist420 0 points1 point ago

Yes, there is a ~30k HP fan in the front with a massive clutch mechanism attaching it to a second turbine shaft at the back of the engine. If this clutch were released while the craft was hovering you'd see the nose go down just as shown. Next, as the aircraft pivoted around the rear nozzle you'd see that the thrust out the back would increase dramatically. Then, as the craft spun around and was about vertical you'd have to immediately tell the nozzle to straighten out, and increase power to max (if not already there). At that point you're just realying on the greater than 1:1 power/weight ratio to get you out of there.

I don't work for them, but I studied Aero under some of their poeple and had the chance during a field trip to the Pratt & Whitney factory to pick the ear of one of their top engineers for about an hour about this particular system. I was well educated about it going in, and he filled in all of the missing details for me about how/why it works so well. This is some amazing technology, but most of the "hard part" is simply the turbine blade and combustion chamber materials that allow for a higher combustion chamber temp, higher exit temps, and therefore greater efficiency of the engine.

Sorry for the delayed reply

[–]RayBoogs 0 points1 point ago

He could do it, but not with that altitude, maybe if he was a little higher.

[–]ba5e 0 points1 point ago

cant you just try it at a greater altitude circumventing some of the immediate risk?

[–]Inf3rn0_44 16 points17 points ago

just fucking epic :) can't beat old bf2

[–]jackdbunny 11 points12 points ago

Flying's really simple. You just throw yourself at the ground and miss.

[–]keiyakins 0 points1 point ago

The funny thing is that's literally how orbits work. You're going to the side so fast that by the time you 'should' hit the ground, you're halfway around the planet and the ground's not there anymore.

[–]WeaponsGradeHumanity 0 points1 point ago

First thing I thought of.

[–]quedfoot 9 points10 points ago

Incoming! An influx of inexperienced pilots in BF3 will soon attempt this maneuver.

[–]mohaukachi 15 points16 points ago

DO A... Never mind.

[–]amichaux 2 points3 points ago

FUCKING PEPPY

[–]dildor420 0 points1 point ago

Cpol

[–]foreverambrea 13 points14 points ago

....What is this?

[–]Roopa132 35 points36 points ago

It's an F-35 in Battlefield 2 (video game).

[–]JimbobTheBuilder 8 points9 points ago

looks like a flight simulator, and the person is piloting an F-35.

Also, to answer your question, "not feasible"

[–]foreverambrea 39 points40 points ago

Oh. I thought it was real. Silly me. :(

[–]SAIUN666 29 points30 points ago

Hard to tell because of all the pixels.

[–]SCRAAAWWW 1 point2 points ago

Or the lack-thereof.

[–]TomShoe 12 points13 points ago

As someone else said, battlefield 2. not quite a flight simulator, but a great game none the less.

[–]Kuzzo -3 points-2 points ago

Battlefield pretty much is a flight simulator.. In the flying part.

[–]Nebulaoblivion 5 points6 points ago

God damnit Maverick, that stunt you pulled could have killed us all!

[–]MaverickTopGun 0 points1 point ago

You just aren't living in the danger zone

[–]Kebabs 6 points7 points ago

VTOL bitch!

[–]TylerDurdenisreal 0 points1 point ago

STOVL.

[–]Richey_Tenenbaum 8 points9 points ago

Oh Battlefield 2. There were never any average skill pilots in BF2, everyone was either so pro they got 50 kills a game or so bad they just flew them into the ocean when trying to take off. Usually the latter.

[–]wazabi 1 point2 points ago

we used to park our jets in the boat part of the carriers, and then see everybody freak out because a jet came from inside the boat.

[–]AWildBull 2 points3 points ago

Fabulous.

[–]nsidd 2 points3 points ago

Was the pilot "Launchpad McQuack"?

[–]vaxam676 2 points3 points ago

I remember when my dad sent this to me... It came with the text "Look at how close this air force pilot gets to the runway. It's amazing how skilled and trained these pilots are. God Bless America!" I laughed and quickly replied to him about how that was a video game and, I'm sorry it's just some guy behind a computer screen recording what has become of many many hours of Battlefield 2.

[–]wazabi 2 points3 points ago

Bf2 1.03.. Best gaming times I ever had.. Alive community, battling clans, squads full of players working together and listening to the commander..

I remember being in a stunt clan with a finnish guy, we used to pull these tricks daily.. Good ol' days..

[–]fooswashere 1 point2 points ago

It's hilarious how you operate the CIWS in that game.

[–]kriggs5033 1 point2 points ago

Lol caught myself making sound effects

[–]dudeabides86 1 point2 points ago

Abort abort! oh I got this...

[–]jqtxpyer 1 point2 points ago

I, having never played BF2 thought this was real and was stunned.

[–]zenazure 1 point2 points ago

if that was a real f-35, and i was on the deck i would be shitting myself.

[–]red_280 1 point2 points ago

As over the top as the stunts in BF2 were (i.e. barrel rolls with attack choppers), the skill ceiling for flying aircraft was extremely high and the really good players who put practice into it could quite deservedly do some really awesome shit. Obviously the balancing of aircraft left a lot to be desired (two words: jet rape), but Battlefield 3 has really simplified the flight model a lot and it doesn't quite retain the pseudo-realism that BF2 had when it came to vehicle combat in general.

[–]djpokeboy 1 point2 points ago

This is how i take off in BF3. Followed by crashing into a mountain straight after.

[–]mschnarr 1 point2 points ago

Haters gunna hate

[–]TheClayroo 1 point2 points ago

Good Guy OP: Could have titled it "Seems legit;" Doesn't.

[–]nathanb065 1 point2 points ago

Harrier jets are, by far, the most amazing planes I've personally every seen. I WANT..nay ...NEEEEEDDD one!

[–]IncombingInk 18 points19 points ago

*F-35

[–]nathanb065 14 points15 points ago

Ill let the downvotes take over my mistake. Thanks for correcting me though buddy.

[–]TylerDurdenisreal 2 points3 points ago

I mean, come one dude it doesn't even resemble a Harrier.

[–]nathanb065 1 point2 points ago

Its hovering.

[–]TylerDurdenisreal 0 points1 point ago

Yeah there are other planes that can do that now

[–]nathanb065 0 points1 point ago

Honestly, I had no clue. Thanks for sharing that

[–]codydub 0 points1 point ago

It just did a fucking front flip. My mind is BLOWN

[–]Jibber_Fight 0 points1 point ago

I love the physics of that. I watched several times with an awed expression.

[–]lazermoon 0 points1 point ago

Because fuck you that's why.

[–]SickOfCats 0 points1 point ago

To infinity and beyond!!.. Well, at least beyond.

[–]mattronus 0 points1 point ago

This is the best thing I have ever seen

[–]FireRescue666 0 points1 point ago

Ho. Lee. FUCK.

[–]GreenSteel 0 points1 point ago

Watching, "What, is it going to just fall?"... "Oh my god! It's going to crash!", "Phew, that was clo- Oh my god!", "Wait, nevermind."

[–]Redtiki 0 points1 point ago

Was gonna say "lolarma" but then i noticed the hud and was like "mehbattlefield".

[–]brazildood 0 points1 point ago

I want to believe

[–]A_Wild_Missingno 0 points1 point ago

reminds me of when games lag-desync and then snaps back into reality gameplay

[–]SeeDeez 0 points1 point ago

omg I fucking love this

[–]DamnSpamFilter 0 points1 point ago

woahh

just realised it's a video game... fuck

[–]Untitledone 0 points1 point ago

Ahh good ole BF2, I loved that game. I still play it every once in a while. It is probabably one of my favorite games, and my favorite Battlefield game.

[–]NghtElfMhwk 0 points1 point ago

That is literally one of the most badass things I have EVER seen.

[–]Mortegro545 0 points1 point ago

I want to believe

[–]BallsackTBaghard 0 points1 point ago

FUCK. I thought it was real.

edit: NO. To me this still is real, fuck you all.

[–]Mannex 0 points1 point ago

aww is this some bf2 :(

[–]odderz 0 points1 point ago

I recognise the reference in the title, but I can't place it... Can anyone help?

[–]formad12 2 points3 points ago

The original Toy Story, my forgetful peer!

[–]odderz 0 points1 point ago

Dammit, of course! It's all coming back to me now...

[–]creep303 0 points1 point ago

upvotes for the love

[–]awesomeck 0 points1 point ago

Thats the definition of style!

[–]xRustySpoon 0 points1 point ago

Makes me want to play BF2 now. Too bad I can't get it to install on my laptop :/

[–]creep303 -1 points0 points ago

...is your laptop from 2003?

[–]ytayj 1 point2 points ago

Install != Run.

You also have to remember that BF2 is bundled with DRM crap, and when EA do DRM, you can be certain it's going to be faulty.

[–]creep303 0 points1 point ago

Steam my good sir!

[–]xRustySpoon 0 points1 point ago

I can run it just fine lol. The install is acting weird with my system and I can't get it to work.

[–]Yells_SCIENCE 0 points1 point ago

SCIENCE!

[–]dvoge 0 points1 point ago

I could tell almost immediately that this gif would NOT contain my childhood hero-eh-hem, I mean alter ego, and was saddened.

[–]SgtOddball 0 points1 point ago

Am I the only one who heard the transforming sound effect in their head?

[–]rudditte 0 points1 point ago

Please don't try this at home.

[–]Ehmannboy 0 points1 point ago

Isn't the title a Toy Story reference?

[–]DirtBurglar 1 point2 points ago

yes.

[–]Ehmannboy 0 points1 point ago

I thought it was, I wasn't sure. Thanks!

[–]keiyakins 1 point2 points ago

Yep, it is. Woody says it early on to mock Buzz, Buzz says it in the climax on Sid's rocket when Woody says he can't believe they're actually flying.

Source: Watched that movie WAY too fucking many times.

[–]Ninja0verkill 0 points1 point ago

I can't believe that the f-35 just did that.

[–]beatsaudio 0 points1 point ago

... and the comments ruin my everything

[–]mastr_slik 0 points1 point ago

Daaammmnnnn

[–]mastr_slik 0 points1 point ago

Daaammmnnnn!!!

[–]Tomstephens 0 points1 point ago

This is why bf2 was the best

[–]Lilsteps95 -1 points0 points ago

This seems to be actual gameplay footage of flying a jet in Battlefield 3.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]lurker_becomes_lurkd 1 point2 points ago

Ha I love that we were downvoted for letting him know he was pointing out the obvious.

[–]lurker_becomes_lurkd -1 points0 points ago

That is what the title is referencing.