this post was submitted on
1,561 points (59% like it)
4,863 up votes 3,302 down votes

funny

subscribe2,715,518 readers

6,126 users here now


Results of the facebook poll


Reminder: Political posts are not permitted in /r/funny. Try /r/PoliticalHumor instead!


NEW! No gore or porn (including sexually graphic images). Other NSFW content must be tagged as such


Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress. Try /r/politicalhumor instead.

  • Rage comics - Go to /r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 148 comments

[–]showmepotatosalad 26 points27 points ago

Isn't the book about a character whose last name is Grey?...

[–]Mackle 25 points26 points ago

Yeah, pretend you just conjured that up. You know all the lurid details.

[–]showmepotatosalad 5 points6 points ago

Hey now, hear me out first... This book is all over reddit, and I think I heard this through one of the numerous posts. The alibi checks out...

[–]SpaceWorld 1 point2 points ago

First I've heard of it, but when this is reposted, I'll make the same comment if given the chance. You get the benefit of the doubt here.

[–]Mileskitsune 0 points1 point ago

dude, thats about a rare a gift as a single fuck. where did you find it?

[–]Mackle 1 point2 points ago

Your lies don't fool me. I can see it in your text.

[–]bombertaylor 4 points5 points ago

There is TV series adaptation called Grey's anatomy.

[–]wardword 0 points1 point ago

It is, and I just thought OP was being funny (and was using UK) english... but then the word 'color' caught my eye... I just... I just can't handle when people use both. Use one okay, just one. Never both.

[–]SilverSick -1 points0 points ago

yup

[–]slash196 42 points43 points ago

Really bad fanfiction.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]PixyFreakingSticks 6 points7 points ago

Actually, you can make a killing doing this. Obviously, you don't have to be very good.

edit: a word, you know how it goes

[–]chaoswurm 1 point2 points ago

Better love story than twilight

[–]MestR 1 point2 points ago

incest and unicorns

[–]awesomeramber 12 points13 points ago

Really bad Twilight fanfiction.

FIFY

[–]Helter-Skeletor 16 points17 points ago

That's a bit redundant.

[–]awesomeramber 1 point2 points ago

While I agree with you, there are people out there who would love and pay for a well-written Twilight fanfiction, and their money is still money. (I think we can all agree people don't write this kind of garbage because they love writing or have a worth-while story to share with the world. They write for the money). So to those people, it isn't redundant so much as it is a gripe about terrible writing on a subject they otherwise would have masturbated to.

[–]MayorEmanuel -1 points0 points ago

Really brave fanfiction.

[–]landdolphinman 2 points3 points ago

You've never read "Agony in Pink."

Also, don't.

[–]Worst_Lurker 1 point2 points ago

and she is rich now. Maybe I should write a fan fic

[–]nuisible 1 point2 points ago

I told that to someone who read the 50 shades of grey books and twilight and she said she didn't see any similarities. So, either it's so bad that it really became it's own thing or my friend has some bad judgement. Which, going by the fact that she read both of those series, I'd be more likely to believe.

[–]Zelarius 0 points1 point ago

The main male lead in fifty shades of gray is apparently described as more or less looking like Robert Pattinson. I don't remember if there are any other real similarities. This makes it more of a fanfic of the movie series, recasting an actor as a part in sexual fantasies.

[–]sphericalvoxel 79 points80 points ago

Sounds to me like you were surprised that Harper Lee didn't write about mockingbird deaths, that Joseph Conrad didn't write about any actual hearts, or that Ralph Ellison did not write science fiction.

[–]showmepotatosalad 23 points24 points ago

To kill a mockingbird is a metaphor to signify the death of a character in that book, who I can't recall because I read it a long time ago

[–]sphericalvoxel 27 points28 points ago

When he gave us our air-rifles Atticus wouldn't teach us to shoot. Uncle Jack instructed us in the rudiments thereof; he said Atticus wasn't interested in guns. Atticus said to Jem one day, "I'd rather you shot at tin cans in the back yard, but I know you'll go after birds. Shoot all the bluejays you want, if you can hit ‘em, but remember it's a sin to kill a mockingbird."

That was the only time I ever heard Atticus say it was a sin to do something, and I asked Miss Maudie about it.

"Your father's right," she said. "Mockingbirds don't do one thing but make music for us to enjoy. They don't eat up people's gardens, don't nest in corncribs, they don't do one thing but sing their hearts out for us. That's why it's a sin to kill a mockingbird."

In terms of whether it's more symbolic or metaphorical than that, as I recall, the only characters who die are Mrs. Dubose (the opium addict/crotchety old lady), Tom Robinson (the black guy falsely accused of rape), and Bob Ewell (the actual rapist). But it's also been years since I've read it.

[–]showmepotatosalad 24 points25 points ago

It was about the black guy accused of rape. Thank you for quoting all that. The comment about about it being a sin, and what a mockingbird does, is about the wrongfully accused man being shot, as he was a genuinely nice man. He didn't do anything wrong, but be a good man - the author comparing a mockingbird doesn't do anything but sing their hearts out. Well, that's what I got out of it

Edit: I'm glad this post has turned into a mini discussion of a great book. Rather than that about this crappy 50 shades book and all it's hype

[–]sphericalvoxel 10 points11 points ago

That's at least a very reasonable interpretation. I'm always skeptical of claims of symbolism, since in my experience, symbolism is either accidental or overwrought, with very little in between. But that's one of the more plausible claims of symbolism I've heard.

My main experience of To Kill a Mockingbird was that, on the one hand, my mom read it to my brother and I when we were quite young, and I mostly remembered the plot about Arthur Radley; it wasn't until I read it again when I was older that I really grasped the Tom Robinson plot.

On the other hand, I took a history of film class for my undergraduate upper-division humanities requirement, and we watched the film version -- y'know, with Gregory Peck as Atticus -- and near the end of the movie, Robert Duvall makes his cinema debut as Arthur Radley. And he acts just like you'd expect Good Guy Shut-In to act, and the class... laughed at him.

It was one of the most harrowing experiences of my life.

[–]showmepotatosalad 5 points6 points ago

Yea I'm a bit skeptical of some claims of symbolism too. And I always found English classes a bit tough because I was no good at making connections myself. I once heard a quote saying something about: 'when you hear hoofbeats behind you, don't expect a zebra'. And that's now what I think of cases where people are reaching for meanings in literature

[–]Fallacyboy 1 point2 points ago

I always assumed that the mockingbird was supposed to symbolism Arthur's character. If I remember correctly, the line that sphericalvoxel quoted about how it's a sin to kill a mocking bird was said just after Arthur killed Bob Ewell in order to save Atticus Finch's kids, and the line came up after Atticus and the sheriff - forgot his name - decided to report that Ewell committed suicide, or fell on his knife, or something like that. To me at least, it always seemed like they were talking about how Arthur was a great person and how if they reported that he saved Scout he would have become a town hero, but with him being an introverted person that would destroy the way he liked to live - alone and secluded from the town - which would kill the person he was. I reread the book about 2 years ago, having read it it in high school, and that seemed to be the most clear connection of the metaphor to me, but of course it could have other parts of the book it relates to as well. I mean, no one said that a metaphor has to relate to just one part of a book, right?

Edit: FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THIS COMMENT TALKS ABOUT SPOILERS. LIKE A LOT OF THEM, SO DON'T READ IT IF YOU HAVEN'T READ THIS QUINTESSENTIAL AMERICAN MASTERPIECE FOR SOME REASON.

[–]showmepotatosalad 0 points1 point ago

Great edit added to your post. And yes, that makes a lot of sense to me too. Definitely right about how it could apply to more than one part of the story

[–]sphericalvoxel 0 points1 point ago

For reference, I found an online copy of the book here, which is where I pulled the earlier quote. So as another poster pointed out, killing mockingbirds is referenced twice, and this is the one you mean:

Atticus sat looking at the floor for a long time. Finally he raised his head. "Scout," he said, "Mr. Ewell fell on his knife. Can you possibly understand?"

Atticus looked like he needed cheering up. I ran to him and hugged him and kissed him with all my might. "Yes sir, I understand," I reassured him. "Mr. Tate was right."

Atticus disengaged himself and looked at me. "What do you mean?"

"Well, it'd be sort of like shootin‘ a mockingbird, wouldn't it?"

But searching for that, I found one of my favorite sections, also near the end:

Neighbors bring food with death and flowers with sickness and little things in between. Boo was our neighbor. He gave us two soap dolls, a broken watch and chain, a pair of good-luck pennies, and our lives. But neighbors give in return. We never put back into the tree what we took out of it: we had given him nothing, and it made me sad.

I turned to go home. Street lights winked down the street all the way to town. I had never seen our neighborhood from this angle. There were Miss Maudie's, Miss Stephanie's—there was our house, I could see the porch swing—Miss Rachel's house was beyond us, plainly visible. I could even see Mrs. Dubose's.

I looked behind me. To the left of the brown door was a long shuttered window. I walked to it, stood in front of it, and turned around. In daylight, I thought, you could see to the postoffice corner.

Daylight… in my mind, the night faded. It was daytime and the neighborhood was busy. Miss Stephanie Crawford crossed the street to tell the latest to Miss Rachel. Miss Maudie bent over her azaleas. It was summertime, and two children scampered down the sidewalk toward a man approaching in the distance. The man waved, and the children raced each other to him.

It was still summertime, and the children came closer. A boy trudged down the sidewalk dragging a fishingpole behind him. A man stood waiting with his hands on his hips. Summertime, and his children played in the front yard with their friend, enacting a strange little drama of their own invention.

It was fall, and his children fought on the sidewalk in front of Mrs. Dubose's. The boy helped his sister to her feet, and they made their way home. Fall, and his children trotted to and fro around the corner, the day's woes and triumphs on their faces. They stopped at an oak tree, delighted, puzzled, apprehensive.

Winter, and his children shivered at the front gate, silhouetted against a blazing house. Winter, and a man walked into the street, dropped his glasses, and shot a dog.

Summer, and he watched his children's heart break. Autumn again, and Boo's children needed him.

Atticus was right. One time he said you never really know a man until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them. Just standing on the Radley porch was enough.

[–]agnt0007 0 points1 point ago

wow, i don't know what to say. ill give them the benefit of the doubt & say that they didn't understand it.

[–]belflandluvr 9 points10 points ago

At the end, Scout tells Atticus she won't reveal the existence of Boo Radley, saying it would be "like killing a mockingbird."

[–]Dorf_Dorf 0 points1 point ago

spoilers alert!

[–]ihavesharpteeth -4 points-3 points ago

...spoiler alert?

[–]showmepotatosalad 11 points12 points ago

It was required reading for me in grade 8. I guess I assumed if you have heard of the book, you probably have read it.

[–]Murrabbit 0 points1 point ago

I'm pretty sure that this one is way past the statute of limitations on spoilers and is firmly in the realm of shit you should know by now.

[–]ihavesharpteeth 0 points1 point ago

Sorry for thinking of people that might not have read it

[–]astrophys 3 points4 points ago

Well, it is Gaston...

[–]iamagainstit 1 point2 points ago

didn't they sacrifice a cow and cut out its heart in heart of darkness?

[–]sphericalvoxel 0 points1 point ago

Wouldn't surprise me. That was an English class book that I promptly forgot. I mostly remember Kurtz's famous last words.

[–]notanotherpyr0 1 point2 points ago

At least there is Dickens with his tales involving two cities, carols about Christmas and adventures involving a person called Oliver Twist.

[–]universal_straw 0 points1 point ago

But at least those titles still made sense after reading the book. This one doesn't I'm assuming. Going off what my sister told me about the book, I haven't read it myself.

[–]SingaporeShling 11 points12 points ago

Also, the writing was awful!

[–]icontrolmyself 11 points12 points ago

The writing really was terrible. I read some of the book out of curiosity. I ended up skipping to the sexy parts out of boredom. Which were annoyingly no where near the front page. What the fuck was with them mentioning the instep of her foot every 5 seconds? Instep is not a hot word.

[–]luvmuppet 1 point2 points ago

even the sexy parts were boring. But millions of women are reading it and thinking it's BDSM.

To me, that says that there are a whole lot of people that just have no idea how to get out of the vanilla sex mold they're in.

[–]MrEnglish 4 points5 points ago

[–]Godfodder 6 points7 points ago

I don't know how this book has become so popular. The writing in it is atrocious, and I don't even care that it's erotica. The author needs to learn to stay the fuck away from adverbs.

[–]NotaMethAddict 24 points25 points ago

This post is truly the bravest. I don't know anyone brave enough to crack a joke a 50 shades of gray. Reddit loves that book to death.

[–]aryst0krat 14 points15 points ago

This comment it truly the originalest. It is in no way, shape, or form just a half-assed rephrasing of 'SO BRAVE'. In fact, it is almost as originalesterful as making fun of Twilight and/or 50 Shades of Grey.

[–]NotaMethAddict 3 points4 points ago

Saying "So brave," doesn't make it any less true. The reason why I didn't say "So brave," in the first place is because most of Reddit doesn't even understand that it's supposed satire anymore and jumps into a bravery train of circlejerking.

[–]aryst0krat -1 points0 points ago

And I appreciate that.

I was mostly joking, but I hate that stupid 'SO BRAVE' circlejerkers' haven comment thread that shows up on almost every post these days so much that I tend to get really pissy at even the hint of one.

In my eyes, it's much more annoying than the actual 'braveness' of the posts.

[–]TylerKeys 1 point2 points ago

SO BRAVE

[–]aryst0krat 0 points1 point ago

DOHOHO.

[–]LadyCopperFoxx 8 points9 points ago

I feel like the only female who has no interest in reading this book.

[–]nobodieswife 2 points3 points ago

Nope! I am not either! Nor do I have interest in romance novels period. There is another post on reddit that has a page from 50 shades. It sounds like a teenage boy wrote it. It says something like he thrust into her 'hooha'. What?

[–]laddymaddonna 6 points7 points ago

nah that wasn't really from the book

[–]nobodieswife 0 points1 point ago

Oh, haha, that's good cuz I thought the whole 50 shades craze was even worse after seeing that. Couldn't see how people could read that crap.

[–]laddymaddonna 0 points1 point ago

ya i couldn't read more than like 4 sentences

[–]sharpiefairy666 3 points4 points ago

That "hooha" thing you read was a fake. It's not from Fifty Shades of Grey, or any other book.

[–]mistielovesyou 8 points9 points ago

Really? Neither of you likes 50 shades? You're kidding. I thought every 'female' loved the same books, movies, and tv. Are you trying to tell me that different people have different tastes that they shouldn't have to justify? I've always thought that people can only justify liking some things, or else they're stupid or crazy.

[–]om_nom_nom 3 points4 points ago

Snowflake syndrome something like that.

[–]zanily 2 points3 points ago

nah, EL uses classy terms like "down there", "meeting of my thighs", and "my sex"

[–]LadyCopperFoxx 0 points1 point ago

I've never seriously read a romance novel. I used to steal my Girl Scout leader's novels and read them to my troop-mates in the most outrageous accents I could contrive. But that was just for laughs. Also- this was my Junior year in High School that this happened.

The entire premise for the book sounds idiotic. Luckily most of my friends either aren't interested in it or aren't posting about it. I'm in college so luckily I can just get up and move if someone starts talking about it.

[–]Lyeta 0 points1 point ago

I don't either. I want sexual whatever? I'll just go bang my boyfriend.

This is perhaps why the single women at my job like it so much.

[–]nobutterinhell -1 points0 points ago

Not me either. I think most people who like this probably like Jersey Shore or other junk like that. We need a new class of fiction called Junk Fiction. There are some reasonable and well written romance novels (few), but I knew on page 2 that this was pure Junk.

[–]RustBrotherOne 21 points22 points ago

I don't get why people are complaining about 50 shades of gray. Sure, its not Neil Gaiman or Patrick Rothfuss or Terry Prachet or Fitzgerald or any other amazing author out there... but it gets people to read. I mean seriously. Human beings are picking up books and reading them. Why are we bitching about this? Because its about sex? Well written sex? Poorly written sex? Welcome to the romance section guys, its about a girl getting laid and NOT feeling guilty about it.

I'm sure there are plenty of people who aren't complaining about 50 shades of gray... and this message is not aimed at you. So please don't take offense. But there are people who seem to be generally disgruntled over it and I don't get why. We play videogames about killing things, to other people its literally this "This isn't a story, its a bloodbath!" and that's it. To gamers who play games like the witcher 2 its not "just a blood bath" its a story that they enjoy, sex, blood, excitement. the whole nine yards.

In short, complaining about fiction, any fiction, is a waste of time. Bitch about Twilight? Waste of time. Bitch about Vampire books? Waste of time. Bitch about housewives reading a book about sex that they seriously enjoy? Waste. Of. Time.

Stories are meant to ENTERTAIN people. Its meant to entertain its audience. A specific audience, mainly, that audience that enjoys that particular story.

Stop complaining about people reading books that you don't like. Stop whining about how "dumb" this is or how "retarded" that audience is. Go back to your cats and your stories and your lives, there's still a sun shining outside. Go out and enjoy it. Go out and talk to people in person.

Hell, go read a book that you thought was stupid because the internet said so and find out that maybe, just maybe, you actually like it.

Just whatever you do... Stop complaining that people are reading. It's a waste of my time.

[–]Fnerb 18 points19 points ago

Ya know, you can stop beating around the bush. If you thought it's a waste of time just say so.

[–]RustBrotherOne 5 points6 points ago

hahahaha xD this response was better than I expected.

[–]sovietsrule 10 points11 points ago

Someone's Jimmies have been rustled...

[–]RustBrotherOne 2 points3 points ago

Are you implying that this is too negative?

[–]am4zon 2 points3 points ago

[–]RustBrotherOne 5 points6 points ago

... xD

[–]Helmet_Icicle 2 points3 points ago

but it gets people to read.

Only because the story is written word.

[–]RustBrotherOne 3 points4 points ago

Do elaborate please, I am afraid that I am missing your point.

[–]Persius 1 point2 points ago

Helmet_icicle is saying that the medium the story is being presented through isn't affecting how people feel about reading. Picking up grey isn't going to inspire anyone to grab a copy of Ulysses.

[–]RustBrotherOne 0 points1 point ago

Also, upvote for clarity. this was a good response. :)

[–]RustBrotherOne 0 points1 point ago

Why should picking up grey inspire anybody to read Ulysses? If someone enjoys romance novels then why must they be forced to endure ancient greek stories as well? There is no logic there I am afraid.

Picking up a copy of Grey and enjoying it would mean that you would want to go read more books like Grey, just like picking up Name of the wind by Patrick Rothfuss would make me want to go read more epic high fantasy novels the size of a small child's head. Just because I read Patrick Rothfuss does not mean I must read Ulysses or Grey.

The same goes for the people who enjoy reading 50 shades, they shouldn't be looked down on because they do not want to read Ulysses or Name of the wind no matter how awesome either book may be to us because they have no need to enjoy what I enjoy as long as they enjoy what they enjoy.

I am simply happy that they are reading. Can you and Helmet_icicle not feel the same way?

[–]RustBrotherOne 0 points1 point ago

I see that I am not agreed with. It is a shame that whoever is downvoting me is not bothering to speak their mind on what I say, as I am hopefully proving up above... I am fully willing to hear someone out even if I do not agree with them as long as they give me the same courtesy in return.

My stance has not changed on this subject, some redditors have responded with humor, in turn I have laughed. Other have discussed this bluntly, I as well give my honest opinion. The Karma is not what is bothering me here, I could honestly care less. I am instead bothered by the fact that anybody downvoting is not adding their own comment to this as well.

This is a fairly serious issue here on reddit, people will jump on the hate bandwagon against something just because it was stated on the internet that it was what they should do. I am opening discussion on this here and now. Feel free to express your opinion, but do not stay silent if you are going to downvote anybody. Including my opposition. Give honest and clear answers.

Thank you for taking the time to read this and good day.

[–]Helmet_Icicle 0 points1 point ago

In your comment, the only good thing you say about the book is that it gets people to read. Aside from the fact that this isn't true (beyond reading the actual book itself), the same thing can be said for all books.

[–]RustBrotherOne 2 points3 points ago

No, I did miss your point. I am sorry if you read the previous message. I have to disagree with you of course, people can pick up a book at the suggestion of a friend and find out that they enjoy it and the entire genre that it represents and this will of course get them reading more books inside that genre. I do not understand hating on a book that people enjoy reading.

[–]Helmet_Icicle 0 points1 point ago

Just because they can doesn't mean they will. It's a terrible representation of the genre and the subject matter.

[–]RustBrotherOne 0 points1 point ago

That is your opinion, not an actual fact. I am sorry, but just because you dislike the book does not mean the book is any worse or better than any other book. You seem to be forgetting a point I highlighted earlier. The purpose of a story is to entertain. If this book entertains people then so be it. People should stop bitching every time the masses enjoy a book that they themselves do not.

[–]Helmet_Icicle 0 points1 point ago

No, it's simply the nature of the book. It's been widely held to misrepresent all sorts of facets of D&S. It started off as a Twilight fan fiction, that's hardly the pinnacle of modern literature.

The purpose of a story is to entertain. If this book entertains people then so be it. People should stop bitching every time the masses enjoy a book that they themselves do not.

That's like saying the purpose of food is to be eaten, regardless of whether its nutritious or not. People are certainly free to eat fast food every day of their lives, but is it good for them and the human race as a whole? Of course not.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Helmet_Icicle 0 points1 point ago

(beyond reading the actual book itself)

[–]CynicalCanadian 0 points1 point ago

So... You're complaining about people complaining?

[–]RustBrotherOne 1 point2 points ago

Yes, I am. I am also stating my opinion that while its fine to dislike the content of the book, to dislike the book and its audience soley based off of the idea that you are following an internet trend is disgusting. To bash reading in any form is disgusting.

That is one of the points I am trying to make. Sorry if you disagree or do not like it.

[–]xenodius 1 point2 points ago

You know what's a bad idea? Reading 50 shades with your wife when you can't have sex because of health issues.

[–]R99 1 point2 points ago

Why?

[–]xenodius 3 points4 points ago

I assume you mean the health issues-- vaginismus. And while we still have intimate time... it's not the same. She's quite happy with the attention, though =)

[–]R99 1 point2 points ago

That stinks, bro.

[–]xenodius 1 point2 points ago

[I nod in agreement] And after being married over a year, with almost no money, living in a city she hates (for my degree in 9 months), working terrible hours (1:30 AM to 12:00 or 1:00PM most days) and significant sexual frustration, we're still super chipper and wonderful together! We've had a few fights, but never for long and we both always feel terrible about it immediately after. We still make ridiculous cutesy noises at each other, sit on each others laps while we pee/poo, and are (largely unbeknownst to our friends) the most ridiculously snugly couple ever. We're completely ourselves all the time. =)

Despite everything else in our lives being less than perfect, we are. =) Only together, though. =)

Besides, it's gotten a lot better and we only recently began to understand the issue. I'm hoping that our 2nd anniversary will be filled with all the lovemaking that anniversary 1 and 0 both missed!

[–]danish_hole 2 points3 points ago

Mind explaing the whole reason you two can't...do it? I'm intriguied. Intrigiued. En-tree-ged.

[–]xenodius 0 points1 point ago

She had a yeast infection for over 8 years, right up until when we got married, because she didn't know that irritation and perpetual discomfort weren't part of puberty. Because she was so accustomed to pain with, for example, tampons, even though she began treatment for it before we got married (and finished weeks after) her body developed a reflex.

It's like her vagina winces at the thought of penetration, except instead of wincing, it shuts up like an steel trap and she doesn't even realize it. At first, penetration was impossible. After lots of... activities, she was able to relax a little, but not enough to have sex. She got a prescription for Premarin, which after a couple months started to help, but only for a week of way too much sex. The problem is, having sex with any discomfort sets us back because it reinforces the reflex, but I can't get her to tell me when it hurts because she's a badass.

Really, vaginismus is surprisingly common. At least, common enough that there are "treatment kits" that combine a bunch of products together... I think I heard an approximation of 5-6% of women experience it at some point.

[–]danish_hole 1 point2 points ago

Oh man, TIL, that's really interesting, thanks for sharing, i'm sorry you guys can't do it, hopefully she gets better soon, good luck!

[–]yepperoni 1 point2 points ago

Poorly written porn, too. It makes me die a little inside every time someone refers to the books as literature.

[–]SniperTooL 0 points1 point ago

Cliterature, perhaps?

[–]hugocrepax 1 point2 points ago

I'm waiting for Fifty Shades of Sasha Grey.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

Why does everyone care so much about the fact that it's basically porn in words? That's prettyyy much the point of the book, a more "acceptable" version of porn for women. Erotic literature for women is nothing new, this is just more popular. It's not meant to be a classic piece of literature. It's meant to get women who otherwise would feel "naughty" looking at porn hot in their pants. When you turn on your porn videos do you look at your fake-breasted, blonde-dyed 'school girl' in heels getting fucked from behind and think, "Wow, this is shit. It's nowhere near as well done as 'Schindler's List,' I'm going to stop watching." No, because the two films are meant to serve two completely different purposes.

For the record: I'm a 21 year old girl, I like watching porn, and I haven't read 50 Shades of Grey (but have friends who have). I'm just annoyed because it basically seems like a bunch of guys bashing the book for basically being a badly written porno that's directed at women, while they most likely have a couple tabs open on some amateur bimbo getting drilled by her pizza man with terrible dialogue and think it's great.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Maybe you, particularly, feel that way. But I've seen plenty of guys basically bashing the book for BEING porn and women for reading it, not saying anything about whether the women are admitting that that's what it is.

[–]Dabrenn 0 points1 point ago

I don't think any of the men who watch the bad porno's think that they are genuinely good stories with accomplished actors. The point of them is to be SO BAD that they're stupid and therefore funny.

The problem I personally have the 50 shades is that the women who read it actually think that it is GOOD writing and a GOOD book. That's just stupidity in its finest, and stupidity bothers me.

If the women admitted that it was a poorly written book and read it for the "lulz" and did not take it so seriously, I wouldn't care.

[–]HighTechnocrat 1 point2 points ago

Not even good porn. Even as far as BDSM stuff goes its horrifically tame.

[–]midbc 1 point2 points ago

shitty book but you know reddit has to make a big deal out of some things then the karma whores have to beat it to death

[–]readcard 0 points1 point ago

This is funny because it is actually Twilight slash fan fiction, the dedication at the front of Fifty shades tells you it was released on the net under another pseudonym. Google the name and see what find.

[–]trashtrashnotforyou 0 points1 point ago

slash fan fiction is fan fiction about a homosexual couple. "master of the universe" was about bella and edward.

[–]readcard 0 points1 point ago

oops, not being a reader of either genre... not my opinion just parroting someone else I saw on reddit, the names were changed apparently and enough of the story to make it a different story.

Will try to avoid commenting on second hand info

[–]c0ur4ge 0 points1 point ago

I took a chance on humanity and clicked this link to see if it'd just be the seinfeld.gif. Somehow this was worse.

[–]PemCorgiSelphie 0 points1 point ago

Then you didn't read the actual book, it took until about chapter 7 for any porn to start.

[–]Sil369 0 points1 point ago

bs, u dont look like that

[–]ahdra 0 points1 point ago

You lied! Reading couple pages won't get to the porn part!! U must have read more than 1/3 of the book!!!

[–]didoty 0 points1 point ago

This is the first post that I've ever upvoted in 'new' that I've seen on the front page of /r/funny... I feel like a hipster now

TL;DR: I upvoted this before it was cool

[–]Xetanees 0 points1 point ago

So how the hell did the comments go from an adult book to another book about rape and metaphorical characters?

[–]RedShirtedAss 0 points1 point ago

Reddit is literally the only place I hear about 50 Shades of Grey anymore.

[–]Dirkenhiemer 0 points1 point ago

More Gaston!

[–]hetres 0 points1 point ago

Wait, you are judging people for their interest in porn...? Please tell me you don't look in mirrors.

[–]harrydorcas 0 points1 point ago

Why does Belle have to be at the back peeping?

[–]NeuromancerLV 0 points1 point ago

That youtube video of John St. John reading Shades of Grey in his Duke Nukem voice is pretty damn funny.

[–]sane-ish 0 points1 point ago

ohhh that book is without a doubt porn!

[–]megusta_tortugas 0 points1 point ago

I didn't realize that this book was porn with words when I asked my friends mom if I could borrow her copy.

[–]MEOW--MIX 0 points1 point ago

False, the first few pages don't even consist of porn, that's not till the second chapter.

[–]enazatol[S] 1 point2 points ago

I just flipped to some random page, it was like 53 I believe.

[–]Swoove 0 points1 point ago

Well some people use their imagination.

[–]Sl1ngdad 0 points1 point ago

My exact words, "This is some dirty shit, are you reading this?"

[–]Tropicalcows 0 points1 point ago

For anyone interested in entertaining reviews of the first two books:

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/340987215

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/341907930

[–]The_FactSphere 0 points1 point ago

Should've read something good....like the Poetic Edda.

[–]Augieitaliano 0 points1 point ago

Haha so true!!!!

[–]Ceefax81 0 points1 point ago

Girls keep saying "Yeah, the writings bad, but it's really mucky". But when I show them films that meet the same criteria, no, apparently they're not as trendy.

[–]Kensin 0 points1 point ago

Yes, we get it, it's a poorly written erotic story, can we please stop talking about it now?

[–]repostrapist 0 points1 point ago

It's a lot like watching porn, when you have to turn the page it's like the video is buffering.

[–]C_T_C_C 0 points1 point ago

Ahem

Colour

[–]sloaninator 0 points1 point ago

Were you looking to read a book about the color grey?

[–]JarlofDenmark -1 points0 points ago

Well, the book is called 50 shades of grey, so he probably thought it was about paint or something. Which is why he was so confused by its popularity.

Edit: I didn't realize people don't like facetious-ness.

[–]payperplanes 0 points1 point ago

My grandma literally bought the first two books because she thought they were about old people with grey hair. She was very surprised.

[–]Toobad113 0 points1 point ago

My reaction when i read this post http://i.imgur.com/gsY7S.png

[–]fswmacguy 6 points7 points ago

I've never seen this before.

:-(

I just wanted my slice of bread.

[–]MilkyMailMan -1 points0 points ago

50 shades of dismay

[–]sawyoutobits -3 points-2 points ago

50 shades of foreplay.

[–]Dat_Karmavore 4 points5 points ago

50 shades of shut the fuck up.

[–]BA_Start -1 points0 points ago

50 shades of pun thread

[–]u83rmensch -4 points-3 points ago

Grey is not a color.

[–]R99 1 point2 points ago

Erhm, it can be spelled as gray or grey.

[–]u83rmensch 0 points1 point ago

i see that, whats the problem then?

[–]danish_hole 0 points1 point ago

I always get so fucking confused about if it's Sasha GrEy or Sasha GrAy

[–]u83rmensch 0 points1 point ago

i dont see a problem here.

[–]sharpiefairy666 0 points1 point ago

FYI: Grey is a color.

[–]u83rmensch 0 points1 point ago

if thats the case 1) its a really shitty color 2) my high school art teacher fuck'n lied to me.

[–]sharpiefairy666 0 points1 point ago

Grey can be considered a "shade" in some respects, but it is also considered a color. Neon yellow-green is a shitty color, too, but it's still a color.