this post was submitted on
3,133 points (56% like it)
14,102 up votes 10,969 down votes

gifs

unsubscribe317,135 readers

791 users here now

Kiva

Links to amusing, interesting, or funny .gifs from the web! .gif format submissions only, please!

How to make your own animated gifs?

Please try not to repost and post reaction gifs in /r/reactiongifs.

Direct image links preferred! Avoid pages that have other extraneous material besides the gif like headers, banners, ads, etc. And please, no blogspam. URL-shorteners are NOT allowed!

Witty titles optional. nsfw when necessary; this implies the comments within will be too.

NUDITY GOES IN /r/nsfw_gifs

MARK SEXY GIFS AND SERIOUS INJURIES NSFW
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL NOW BE REMOVED

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]tricky3344 748 points749 points ago

It's about the only thing Strauss has hit recently....

[–]JustFineThankYou 657 points658 points ago

I'll give you my upvote because I know nothing about cricket, but it seems as if you do.

[–]WookieGoldberg 54 points55 points ago

Heyooo! I bet...

[–]smacktaix 27 points28 points ago

Did you see that ludicrous display last night.

[–]a655321a 10 points11 points ago

What was arsenal thinking?

[–]sunkenOcean01 5 points6 points ago

The thing about ARSEnal is they always try to walk it in.

[–]brocoder 160 points161 points ago

[–]adwarakanath 2 points3 points ago

LOL too true. Let's see if Bell can hold out for a draw today

[–]treggify 171 points172 points ago

You couldn't do this on purpose if you tried.

[–]webby_mc_webberson 52 points53 points ago

you'd end up putting your arm out and breaking 100 other things outside the frame of the shot and you still would not succeed.

[–]CasioSK-1 943 points944 points ago

This is certainly the coolest thing I've ever seen in relation to Cricket.

[–]pseudolobster 550 points551 points ago

You know, this may just be the only thing I've ever seen in relation to cricket.

[–]nodnodwinkwink[S] 136 points137 points ago

I haven't a fuckin notion how the game works and i don't really care either. This gave me a laugh though.

[–]MrShow 77 points78 points ago

What you're seeing in the gif is, he just scored a smashing whacker. It's hard to see from the gif, but if he was able to crack both lenses in the glasses, the other team then has to simultaneously stand up and parade around the outskirts of the pitch backward. The lowest ranking player has to start the parade first and finish last. The ranking is based on how many smashing whackers you've forced onto the other team over the previous 3 season.

A season lasts two decades.

[–]csonnich 29 points30 points ago

I was believing this until about halfway through...

I think you're taking advantage of our ignorance.

[–]suo 6 points7 points ago

Brits like to take the piss out of themselves but, come on, you don't really think we'd call a certain occurrence in sport a smashing whacker do you?

[–]Lemme_Axe_You 1 point2 points ago

Brits like to take the piss out of themselves

you don't really think we'd call a certain occurrence in sport a smashing whacker do you?

I think you just answered your own question...

[–]DagNasty 27 points28 points ago

Waitasec, those are the rules for Calvinball!

[–]MrShow 25 points26 points ago

Well yeah, before the merger.

[–]Flashpoint101 5 points6 points ago

This tickled me! Thank you.

[–]Flashpoint101 7 points8 points ago

Always. Upvotes for Calvinball.

[–]Bladegrey 4 points5 points ago

Quick! He's stumbled into the perimeter of wisdom!

[–]ingsha 85 points86 points ago

[–]da_man_made_of_bread 30 points31 points ago

I'm a cricket fan and this shit is funny.

[–]Nachteule 29 points30 points ago

There he goes. Very nice indeed. Look how he moves. Look how he fringes the ring there. Amazing!

[–]Ironfruit 69 points70 points ago

Indeed. Cricket is the only game in which I am unsure of who is winning when the scores are in plain sight.

Edit: Just to clarify, I am also a Brit. I have never watched Baseball.

[–]jdr66 30 points31 points ago

Asking who is winning in the middle of a 5 day Test match is a poor question. There is so much time and so many twists and turns ahead, better to just let the story unfold. I can give you the score, but who is "winning" may not be clear.

[–]KonigSteve 24 points25 points ago

5... Days...?

[–]krusader42 52 points53 points ago

They start each morning for a couple hours, then break for lunch. A couple more hours of play, then another break for tea (of course). Then they play until the sun goes down. And they come back the next morning.

It generally takes about four days' play to complete a match, but this is a game invented in the English summer so rain delays are common. If the game isn't over at the end of the fifth day, it ends in a draw; this is different from a tie, where both teams finish on identical scores. Often matches end with one team desperately trying to get the other team out, while their opposition is desperate to keep batting until the last day ends to save the match.

Matches didn't use to have time limits, so-called "timeless tests." The last such match was in 1939 in South Africa. It had to be abandoned after nine days so that the English team could catch their boat home.

More recent adaptations are one-day cricket (self-explanatory) and Twenty20 cricket which takes just over 3 hours to play.

[–]justapunkrocksong 27 points28 points ago

I can't even tell if you're joking or not.

[–]clashmo 35 points36 points ago

Nope, all serious. It's truly a great game to watch. But I think you have to be brought up with it

[–]ha5hmil 4 points5 points ago

I agree, i used to play cricket with my mates during breaks in school, and with the neighbouring kids, which is pretty popular in India/Sri Lanka. (similar to Basketball, Baseball, Soccer played in the west). So, being brought up with it, you do really appreciate the games. :)

[–]sfriniks 9 points10 points ago

He is not.

[–]Martyn3024 8 points9 points ago

There are different formats of cricket. They are playing Test cricket in the video, which as was previously said, can last up to five days. Its generally accepted that it is the purest version of the sport. Although its slow burner, the drama that can unfold over the course of the match is unrivalled. Newer formats include...

  • One-Day-Internationals - as the name implies, its completed in a day. Each side has one innings to bat.

  • Twenty-20 - A shorter version of ODI, with 20 overs instead of 50 and other rules & additions, which has become increasingly popular since its creation.

[–]AmbroseMcC 11 points12 points ago

i think twenty20 is a good direction for the sport, it replaces what one day matches were meant for-a more spectator and television friendly format. But i think test matches are fundamental to the sport and should never be replaced.

[–]siener 14 points15 points ago

The Test match that the gif is from is ongoing. Day 5 still has to be played.

Here's the kicker: The one South African batsman, Hashim Amla, started batting at the end of day 2. He batted through the whole of day 3 and most of day 4. He was at the crease for a total of 13 hours and 10 minutes and he scored 311 runs.

He also has the coolest beard in world sport.

[–]giddyupbugger 2 points3 points ago

Best summation I've heard.

[–]yoshisdayoff 50 points51 points ago

As a Brit, I feel the exact same with baseball.

[–]videogameexpert 23 points24 points ago

Well in the interest of communication, I assume both sports have 2 teams. In baseball your offense team tries to go around the diamond without being touched by the ball. They are safe when on a "base" and can be touched by the ball at any other time to be taken out of play by the defense. If they make it around they get 1 point.

Can cricket be explained that easily so that I can understand the basic concept?

[–]yoshisdayoff 26 points27 points ago

The same, except two 'bases', and they are sticks (stumps), if at any point the sticks are knocked over and the batsman is not in the safe area, he is out. A run is one point, hitting it to the boundary of the pitch is 4, and if the ball goes over the boundary while in the air, its 6.

The bit of baseball I don't understand is how many players before they switch, what makes a strike, and how many segments is the game broken into.

[–]krusader42 28 points29 points ago

There are nine innings each divided into a "top" first half where the visiting team bats and a "bottom" second half where the home team bats. Each team gets three outs per inning, and they resume batting from the same point in the lineup when the next inning starts. As players score without getting out, the number of players who bat in a single inning is theoretically infinite.

A strike is called when:

  1. The player does not swing and the ball passes through a rectangle the width of home plate and a height from the batter's knees to the midpoint of his torso. This is highly subjective, akin to LBW decisions, and entirely the discretion of the umpire behind the catcher.
  2. The player swings and misses regardless of where the ball is thrown
  3. The player hits the ball into foul territory: anything outside of the third base line (approximately the angle of midwicket) around the backstop to the first base line (cover). Note that the third strike cannot be a foul ball.

If the ball is put into fair territory, the batter must run. No defensive blocks in baseball.

[–]yoshisdayoff 22 points23 points ago

I feel I could watch baseball now and have a good grip on it. So to translate into cricket...

You have 2 innings, with each team batting and bowling, decided by a coin toss, in a good British sportsmanship like way. A batting team is made up of 11 batsmen, and once 10 are out, the teams switch. Each batsmen stays batting until out, so no rotation in that sense.

To get out, a batsman can be:

  1. Run out, when the fielding team strike the wickets (sticks at either end of the running distance) while a batsman is running.
  2. Caught, self explanatory.
  3. Bowled out, where the batsman misses the ball and it strikes the wickets
  4. LBW (leg before wicket), arguably the most difficult rule of cricket, but explained very nicely here

And in cricket defensive shots can be played with no runs, and are usually played at awkward balls designed to trick out the batsman to move awkwardly exposing the wickets, or to stride into an LBW.

[–]Velcropop 2 points3 points ago

Just some clarifications: When the ball strikes the wickets for either a "run out" or when the batsman is "bowled out", the strike must cause either of the bails (the two wooden crosspieces bridging the stumps) to fall off.

Also, for a run out (or stumping) to be effective the batsman must be outside his or her crease--the "safety zone".

[–]52hoova 4 points5 points ago

There are 9 players in Baseball: pitcher, catcher, 1st baseman, 2nd baseman, 3rd baseman, short stop (in between second and third base), and three outfielders (left fielder, right fielder, and center fielder).

A strike is when the batter either swings and doesn't make contact, swings and hits it foul (you can't strike out this way, only the first and second strikes can come from a foul), or doesn't swing but the umpire determines that the ball was in the strike zone.

The game is 9 innings. In every inning, each team gets to bat until they get three outs.

[–]DubiumGuy 8 points9 points ago

Cricket is baseball with only 2 bases. Sort of.

[–]awellam 36 points37 points ago

and waaaaay more action.

[–]mongzords 15 points16 points ago

But...cricket was invented before baseball....

[–]sjc425 12 points13 points ago

Get out of here with your facts!

[–]shortbusoneohone 3 points4 points ago

Awe! You mean Whackbat?!

[–]VTJP 4 points5 points ago

They call them sunnies over there, that's cute :D

[–]akatherder 9 points10 points ago

Really? Really? You've never seen Brockton's chinaman to end the the '04 Whipple? It was tainted by that questionable lbw, but the back to back to back maiden over was simply exquisite. There was truly a black-eyed samoflange that day every time Timobo knackered a googly.

Source: half bullshit, half cricket lingo terms I googled and butchered.

[–]pseudolobster 21 points22 points ago

The thing about Arsenal is they always try to walk it in.

[–]wakeupchoi 5 points6 points ago

Did you see that ludicrous display last night?

[–]SkaterDrew 18 points19 points ago

What about this? It starts around 1min in.

[–]ewest 13 points14 points ago

So you've never seen Lagaan?

[–]EffeCt701 81 points82 points ago

Fuck all the cricket haters in this thread. Its absolutely amazing but is really hard to understand and appreciate it until you have played it or know someone who understands it.

This is the test form of the game which is undoubtedly the most boring version. 50 over and 20 over cricket is much more enjoyable for newcomers to the sport. Test cricket (5 day version, no over limit) is more traditional and only played at international level.

Grassroots is limited to sub-50 over cricket usually.

Edit: I phrased the test comment wrong, it can be appreciated greatly and I know tons of people prefer but I was addressing my comment towards newer players/spectators

[–]mongzords 25 points26 points ago

Test match cricket is the only way to experience cricket imo.

Take a pack of beer down, make some sandwiches and paint your face with the flag of st. george and have a rant at the Aussies.

[–]allelbowss 6 points7 points ago

"All be standing for the Australian National Anthem!"

"God save YOUR gracious Queen..." - etc. Brilliant!

[–]feynmanhasagroupie 20 points21 points ago

i enjoy test cricket but i know it's not for everyone. the ashes is my favorite series.

[–]allelbowss 8 points9 points ago

The Ashes is the only Test series I usually follow because it always seems that the teams are playing for something more than the 'win'.

[–]krusader42 8 points9 points ago

As a Canadian, cricket was always just that crazy game they play in the rest of the commonwealth until my family went on vacation to the UK in 2005.

I caught Ashes fever and learned all about the game by listening to to Test Match Special and reading Wikipedia articles through the rest of the series. Fred Flintoff is a legend and I have been an England fan (in all forms of the game) ever since.

[–]Eist 9 points10 points ago

This is the test form of the game which is undoubtedly the most boring version.

You had me hooked until here. Test cricket combines the mental stamina of chess with the physical attributes of any sport... which has to be sustained over 5 days! It's a game that ebbs and flows, switches between who's on top and who is losing, and showcases some of the most resilient and persevering fortitude of any game.

In short, Test Match Cricket is unrivalled in its brilliance. It's depressing to me that the "now" culture of today does not appreciate this very subtle but extremely rewarding 150 year old game.

[–]shitrus 7 points8 points ago

This comment is so not cricket.

[–]Tovora 29 points30 points ago

I'm Australian, I've played it, I know how it works. It's a horribly boring game.

You might like it, but don't think for a second that anyone who doesn't like it doesn't understand it.

[–]magictravelblog 43 points44 points ago

I'm also Australian. I used to dislike cricket until I realized its role. Baseball seems to fill a similar role in some countries. Its just a justification for social drinking session. You turn it on, then drink and talk with some friends. Most people would consider it odd to say "Do you want to spend Sunday afternoon drinking with me?" but "Do you want to watch the cricket/baseball?" sounds ok.

Cricket and baseball both work well in this role because they take so long. Their length is an advantage because that means more time to drink and talk before it stops being people watching sport and becomes people just sitting around drinking in the middle of the day.

I still don't really like it but at least I feel like I understand why other people like to watch it.

tldr; cricket serves an important role as a cover for heavy drinkers.

[–]a55hol3 9 points10 points ago

Admittedly, I don't know cricket, but I know baseball, and I can tell you there's much more to baseball to a true fan than just just a social experience.

Having played baseball, myself, I can tell you there are little things and big things about the sport that make it so appealing, at least to me: The feel of the ball in your hands, your fingers against the seams; the feel of the weight of that wooden bar in your hands; the smell of the rawhide glove; the feeling you get when you strike a guy out; make a fantastic inning-ending catch; knock a couple runs in off of a well-hit double.

It's a beautiful game with, albeit within a relatively short timespan, plenty of heartwarming history with plenty of legendary players.

God, I love that game.

[–]Machinax 4 points5 points ago

As a lifelong cricket fan who is coming to really enjoy baseball, I completely hear you.

There are little things in cricket that make it such a special game, too - like the feel of a brand new, hard cricket ball in your hands; or when you hit the ball with the sweet spot of your bat, and you see the ball absolutely racing away, even though you didn't put that much physical effort into the shot - but your timing was such that you didn't have to. Just listen to the report in this shot.

As a bowler, something like this will give you an erection for weeks.

I love that our respective games can give us such thrills.

[–]Tovora 17 points18 points ago

I don't drink, maybe this is why I don't like cricket.

[–]wellactuallyhmm 40 points41 points ago

I'm Australian

I don't drink

Does not compute.

[–]good5u 4 points5 points ago

Cricket and baseball both work well in this role because they take so long. Their length is an advantage because that means more time to drink and talk

Perhaps you're just not familiar with baseball, but on average games last about 2 and 1/2 to 3 hours, the same as your average professional football, hockey, or basketball game here in the US.

[–]soccercoachguru 2 points3 points ago

3.15 is the av ML B game time now. Rick Rielly is even complaining about it.

[–]laoman91 2 points3 points ago

Cricket lasts a whole day at least

[–]mnasir94 2 points3 points ago

Cricket is the most watched sport in Pakistan, filled with many of people who don't drink

[–]Cynical_Lurker 1 point2 points ago

I agree with disliking 1-day and test cricket but 20/20 is damn fun to watch. Especially if you can get some friends together and go down and watch it live.

[–]jdr66 4 points5 points ago

If you truly understand it...TRULY understand it, you will love it with a fierce passion. It's not enough to simply have "played" it. It's like anything in life with depth, it's not for everybody, but those who dig deeper will be richly rewarded. Not everybody loves Wagner, chess or particle physics. But those who are in the know can't imagine a world without it. Cricket at the highest level is a deep game which requires deep understanding. If you think it's boring it's because you don't even know what you don't know...

[–]TheSprinkleyOne 2 points3 points ago

[–]here_for_the_lols 63 points64 points ago

Good thing they had something to laugh about in the field, as they also had 311 things to cry about

[–]NineFeetUnderground 38 points39 points ago

Just don't. It's been a painful couple of days...

[–]Honey-Badger 13 points14 points ago

apparently i've forgotten that such a sport exists and im now incredibly interested in cycling.

[–]nico91 177 points178 points ago

It amazes me that they can do athletic activity in dress pants, collared shirt, and nice shoes.

[–]eugenianus 119 points120 points ago

They also break for lunch and tea.

[–]rcgarcia 201 points202 points ago

This is the Britishest sport ever.

[–]TBHBP 75 points76 points ago

Well we invented most of them 1 of them was bound to fill some stereotypes.

[–]JB_UK 18 points19 points ago

The other ones were for foreigners.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points ago

Golf is way more posh.

[–]FlowchartDelicious 3 points4 points ago

Golf is Scottish and will always be Scottish

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago

Isn't Scotland part of GB?

[–]clashmo 13 points14 points ago

careful with that kinda talk

[–]Honey-Badger 2 points3 points ago

and is there anything wrong with that?

[–]Brody3K 20 points21 points ago

Considering they're out in the sun for 6 hours you would expect a few lengthy breaks.

[–]jimaug87 11 points12 points ago

6 hours!? Us Americans get our sporting events over in half that time.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points ago

6 hours a day for five days. And even then there's a good chance of a draw

[–]SuperTimo 51 points52 points ago

And then 3/4 of that is commercials and time outs so you actually get it done in 1/8 of the time. Good for you.

[–]smpx 35 points36 points ago

11 minutes if you're watching football.

A study done by the Wall Street Journal showed that in an 180 minute broadcast of an NFL game, only 11 minutes are cast of the ball actually being played. 67 minutes is of players standing around.

[–]rotaderp 18 points19 points ago

What I hate about the article is this:

As many as 75 minutes, or about 60% of the total air time, excluding commercials, is spent on shots of players huddling, standing at the line of scrimmage or just generally milling about between snaps

Specifically the "standing at the line of scrimmage" line. Pretty sure that writer doesn't know a ton about football.

[–]LeTigreLeTigre 2 points3 points ago

"Football combines the two worst things about America: it is violence punctuated by committee meetings."

[–]Jazzspasm 34 points35 points ago

I'm a Brit and I've been to an American Football game. It was pants. Oakland Raiders at home to the Shittle Cheesers or whoever. Nothing happened all day.

One yard. 10 minute break. One yard. 10 minute break. Change sides. 10 minute break. Followed by a 10 minute break. More ground was taken at the Somme at the rate those chaps were going at it.

And it was snowing. And I was up in the bleachers or whatever you call it, at the very top of the rotten stadium. Any attempt to move seats into shelter in the otherwise empty place was robustly denied by overzealously officious blackshirts.

The only genuine highlight was the shirtless twerp who cartwheeled over concrete steps and seats, all the way shouting 'Mother Fucker!' before he got arrested, much to mine and my compatriots disappointment.

Football, which typically involves a ball and feet (by definition) is decidedly more entertaining and the fans considerably more enthusiastic, with shirtless cartwheeling drunkeds regarded as small beer, unless involved in a coordinated attack on visiting fans.

Also, the hot dogs were crap. And soggy from the snow. In conclusion, a miserable affair.

I think Metallica were playing in San Jose that weekend. Indoors. Where I wasn't.

[–]lordcorbran 19 points20 points ago

People like you are the reason I, a fan of both the American and the International versions of football, have no sympathy for soccer fans who complain about Americans not giving the sport a chance. If you can't take the time to learn the basics of our sport and just dismiss it out of hand, don't get pissed when most Americans take the same approach to yours.

I didn't give a shit about soccer for a long time, until I gave it a real chance, and now I'm a huge fan. American football's a very different game, but it's deep and strategic and requires more teamwork than any other sport I've seen, and it annoys the hell out of me to see people hating on either sport without giving it an honest shot.

Sorry for the rant, don't take it personally; this is just something that really bugs me.

[–]cyberslick188 13 points14 points ago

Anyone who thinks football is a stupid mans sport with dumb idiots banging bodies hasn't seen an NFL playbook.

[–]youdontevenner 5 points6 points ago

Shit dude, just memorizing what the hell the QB is saying when he calls a play is hard. Then comes the snap count, which can also contain audibles to different pass routes, blocking schemes and various types of real or fake handoffs.

[–]lxUn1c0 7 points8 points ago

I like to point out that, strategically and tactically, soccer is more similar to basketball than it is to American football. That's probably why basketball was more successful expanding into Europe. Football is like rugby, but with much more of a trench warfare mentality.

[–]lawlsatron 6 points7 points ago

While it's true that American Football has a very small fraction of time actually containing action, 10 minutes between each play is a teeny bit of an exaggeration. Also, football is defined as a game played on foot, as opposed to on horseback.

[–]cyberslick188 6 points7 points ago

If by "teeny", you mean "Jazzspasm if flagrantly lying and off by a factor of 13" I'd agree.

[–]jimaug87 6 points7 points ago

I'm sorry your stadium sucked. The party that is a Patriots home game just leaves everybody in a fun, rowdy mood. We have fantastic clam chowder, and hot dogs belong at baseball games.

Football plays are similar to military attacks. It takes time to devise your plan. Still, they're limited to 45 seconds. Not 10 minutes. That's a flaggin'

[–]wellactuallyhmm 2 points3 points ago

Even a Bill's home game. That's a drunken good time.

It doesn't help that he went to see the Raiders play (and it snowed?).

[–]dilbot2 0 points1 point ago

You had a choice between Metallica and freezing? Believe me you made the right choice.

[–]mepalm 4 points5 points ago

not much sun in Britain recently I'm afraid.

[–]Brody3K 2 points3 points ago

Here in Australia it's a bit different... As well as India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka etc.

[–]allhailsagan 2 points3 points ago

Nothing beets a good cucumber sandwich at the luncheon break.

[–]jdr66 45 points46 points ago

Cute, but;

*They aren't dress pants. Closer to trackpants. *The game is 6 hrs per day for 5 days, often in extreme sun. Good to be able to protect the back of the neck. *More or less cross-training shoes with spikes.

[–]deputy1389 15 points16 points ago

Why the fuck is the game so long?

[–]Milhouse_is_a_meme 23 points24 points ago

There are 3 types of cricket matches.

The Test Matches take 5 days, where they all wear white. Test Matches are pretty much only played internationally (Australia vs England for example)

The One Day Matches take around 5-7 hours, they wear more common coloured uniforms like any other sporting team. One day matches are the most common type of cricket game you'll see. Good Saturday afternoon game to watch and have a BBQ.

The 20/20 matches are half of that, 3 and a bit. A lot more big hits and a faster paced game. This is a new style of game that's good to watch at the pub, because it doesn't take your whole day.

[–]desertjedi85 11 points12 points ago

What's wrong with a whole day at a pub?

[–]Milhouse_is_a_meme 9 points10 points ago

Nothing, I look forward to it in my 60's.

But in my late 20's, I got way too much shit to do.

And also, realistically, cricket is one of those games you don't need to watch the whole thing to enjoy. At least for me anyway.

[–]pavanky 16 points17 points ago

Why are there 5 baseball / basketball games in a week ?

Test match cricket is a war with many battles.

[–]MajorTroll 37 points38 points ago

ultimate test of concentration and skill

[–]typon 90 points91 points ago

...for the spectators

[–]Stratocaster89 50 points51 points ago

Ultimate test of alcohol endurance

[–]waldron76 9 points10 points ago

For the spectators AND the players.

[–]davidmvdg 2 points3 points ago

Did you say golf? cause they do it too.

[–]nico91 1 point2 points ago

True, but I am going to assume there is a little more running is done in cricket. Also, every time I wear pants to go golfing, I wish I wore shorts.

[–]That1guyjosh 24 points25 points ago

/r/PerfectTiming would get a kick out of this i bet.

[–]nodnodwinkwink[S] 5 points6 points ago

Yup, someone posted a video of it an hour ago.

[–]BD_Andy_B 14 points15 points ago

this is fuckin awesome

[–]plewes37 14 points15 points ago

I love this gif, I love that cricket is on the front page.

Poor old Strauss has had a couple of bad days

[–]Peant 14 points15 points ago

[–]i_am_artist 60 points61 points ago

[–]Ajunk 101 points102 points ago

Deal with it.

[–]Thaumimicus 7 points8 points ago

Can't stop watching.

[–]stooner 36 points37 points ago

This is waaayyy late, but I'm surprised this is isn't mentioned in this thread: Randy Johnson and the exploding bird

[–]achshar 3 points4 points ago

that is just sad.

[–]Pays4Porn 46 points47 points ago

Wow--he must really not like CSI Miami.

[–]Pattang 72 points73 points ago

NAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!

[–]immafiremylaser 19 points20 points ago

(⌐■_■)

( •_•)>⌐■-■

(•_•)

[–]Minimumtyp 20 points21 points ago

You forgot a step or two. Here:

(⌐■_■)

( •_•)>⌐■-■

(•_•)---->• ⌐■-■

(•_•)⌐*-■

(•_•)

[–]NineFeetUnderground 7 points8 points ago

This just about sums up our bowling/fielding performance in this test...

Masterfully woeful.

[–]Doylemetheus 17 points18 points ago

There is a lot of confusion about the sport in this thread, so here is a pretty good summation of the game:

You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side thats been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out. When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There are two men called umpires who stay all out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and all the men have out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game.

[–]pikeybastard 6 points7 points ago

My grandad had a tea towel with this on :)

[–]this_sort_of_thing 41 points42 points ago

No America, Baseball is just as, if not more confusing than Cricket!

[–]MrMono1 52 points53 points ago

NFL is the most confusing sport I have ever seen. What the hell are they doing? Why do they keep stopping? Move dammit!

[–]lordcorbran 7 points8 points ago

If you follow soccer/international football, you'll be familiar with the concept of set pieces, like free kicks and corner kicks, where the action stops, everyone gets into a formation, and then the ball is put into play. In American football, every play is like that. Each team has dozens of possible plays to run, on offense involving either running or passing the ball, and on defense trying to stop specific types of offensive plays. Before each play they have to decide which one they're going to run on the next down, which will vary depending on where they are on the field, what the score is and how much time is left, and that's why action pauses between plays. When the offense then puts the ball into play, both teams execute the specific movements they had planned out, and continue until the player with the ball is tackled.

I can see how someone could consider it boring if they don't understand the mechanics; it's a very deep and strategic game that requires a lot of precision from all 11 guys to do right, but you need to know what you're looking for before you can appreciate that.

[–]clashmo 2 points3 points ago

It always seems to me that it would be a great game played on paper with dice and stats. I quite enjoy watching it though, just don't get much of a chance.

[–]Beetle559 39 points40 points ago

I've been living in the US for a few years and NFL has got to be the most mind numbing sport ever televised, I'd rather watch golf.

Ice Hockey on the other hand has got to be the greatest North American sport of all time, think about it, these guys zip around on a rock hard surface with the intent of slamming other players into a wall with fucking razor blades strapped to their feet.

Ice hockey is awesome.

[–]lenrriquevalencia 6 points7 points ago

I'm Hispanic and many of my relatives think American football is really boring. Likewise some of my American friends think football(soccer) is really boring. I like to watch them both but I'm really not much of a sports fan. Also NFL isn't a sport, it stands for National Football League. Ice Hockey has always seemed really fun to play, I'll give it a try one day but I'll probably end up sliding across the floor lol.

[–]spyfer 3 points4 points ago

Why is it mind numbing? :P Just curious.

[–]MrMono1 12 points13 points ago

Well, they stop playing and talk after running three metres for starters.

[–]jmorlin 2 points3 points ago

/r/hockey

Join us.

[–]hornydeafman69 3 points4 points ago

Thats because the NFL is the most tactic sport. Its like a game of chess.

[–]shit-im-not-white 5 points6 points ago

I did a speech on cricket in my communication studies class. Got an automatic A because no one had any idea about what I was saying.

[–]silver_medalist 6 points7 points ago

I was at this on Saturday. It was hilarious. As was this massive 'beer snake' that fans made from cups: http://twitpic.com/aa6evw

[–]ajaxanon 15 points16 points ago

I wonder if this dude was there watching

[–]clashmo 7 points8 points ago

so doe he want to kill me or have sex with me? cant tell

[–]here_for_the_lols 10 points11 points ago

So funny reading these comments and realising how little american people know about cricket.

[–]DatKass 3 points4 points ago

How much do you know about baseball?

[–]here_for_the_lols 9 points10 points ago

as someone from NZ, where no baseball is played, nor any played on TV, I would bet I know more about it that 99% of Americans know about cricket haha

[–]DatKass 6 points7 points ago

Okay well since there is no way of settling this, later and have a good day.

[–]iNNeRKaoS 2 points3 points ago

Maybe he stole Ethan Hunt's sunglasses, and they were about to explode.

[–]frosty20 1 point2 points ago

[–]webby_mc_webberson 3 points4 points ago

this is masterful.

[–]Naggers123 2 points3 points ago

FUCK YOU, GLARE

[–]Shyamallamadingdong 2 points3 points ago

Someone please add a "Can't Deal With It" caption to this glorious gif

[–]s_mozzie 1 point2 points ago

Channel Nine used to have the coolest intro themes for the cricket. It would build your expectations up so the actual game would always be a let down.

[–]Edvinivich 2 points3 points ago

Did they lose 5 runs for this?

[–]ultimatescarfy 3 points4 points ago

Well that was absolutely doesn't put sunglasses on smashing, baby.

[–]Toxyoi 4 points5 points ago

...if I hadn't seen it with my own 2 eyes.

EDIT: What the friggin' crap am I getting downvoted for? It's a big fluke that he did it, let alone caught on camera. It's awesome. Get off my porch.

[–]I_am_not_novel 2 points3 points ago

He is having a smashing good time.

[–]zyzza 2 points3 points ago

I just came here to remark that I am a 19 year old college student in the United States who did not realize until today that the game of cricket involved throwing a ball. I need to learn more.

[–]Kiowa707 0 points1 point ago

HEADSHOT!

[–]PAY_IN_TIGERS 0 points1 point ago

Really surprised at the lack of Quake-style editing going on.

[–]michaelisnotginger -1 points0 points ago

For whom the Bell tolls.....

[–]Kaiju_Hamster -1 points0 points ago

CHING

AIR MAIL!

[–]jmoney747 0 points1 point ago

It's mesmerizing!

[–]Spiderdan -1 points0 points ago

That was... beautiful.

[–]Kuusou 0 points1 point ago

I said to myself "Wow that really sucks."

But then I soon realized what was going on, and I then said to myself "Wow, that's fucking impressive."

[–]remirotthaus 1 point2 points ago

It's what he gets for trying to throw off his back foot.

[–]devils0508 0 points1 point ago

This is my worst nightmare.

[–]Phoequinox 0 points1 point ago

This may be an "lol fail" gif, but it's pretty damn cool. Like, stylish action movie cool. And I'm pretty sure the guy has the money to buy a new pair of sunglasses, so really, the only thing to come from this is something that looks unreal.

[–]mepalm 1 point2 points ago

I tried to explain cricket to Americans in this thread if anyone is interested in the basic rules.

[–]Alcohol_Intolerant -1 points0 points ago

Sure. "accidentally".

[–]Honky_magoo -1 points0 points ago

Pull.

[–]tierranieve -1 points0 points ago

I'd like to think that it was done on purpose. It makes him all the more badass.

[–]adellinio -1 points0 points ago

True Shot

[–]JustaNiceRegularDude 0 points1 point ago

Am I the only one impressed with that wicked left hand throw and gait?

[–]Juan-Solo 0 points1 point ago

no accident here, just pure awesomeness

[–]retdexgroman 0 points1 point ago

THAT. WAS. AWESOME.

[–]Ducey1984 0 points1 point ago

It's over 9000!!!!!!

[–]swapnild 1 point2 points ago

"Who am i kidding. I'll never need these in England"

[–]blackmattdamon 0 points1 point ago

Who downvotes this? That's funny bad luck

[–]frubie 0 points1 point ago

Should have bought Oakleys

[–]mrpac91 1 point2 points ago

You are doing it wrong man, you need to hit stumps..

[–]ju8t_w0nd3ring 0 points1 point ago

[–]xxleadinglifexx 0 points1 point ago

Watching this made me realize how little I know about Cricket...

[–]rolo90 0 points1 point ago

since I saw the video first, now I'm thinking "damn it, why didn't I make a gif of this shit!".

[–]Apocza 1 point2 points ago

As a South African I approve of Cricket, especially involving South Africa, making it to the front page.

[–]SwarIs 0 points1 point ago