this post was submitted on
3,165 points (52% like it)
28,758 up votes 25,593 down votes

funny

subscribe2,730,818 readers

9,147 users here now


Results of the facebook poll


Reminder: Political posts are not permitted in /r/funny. Try /r/PoliticalHumor instead!


NEW! No gore or porn (including sexually graphic images). Other NSFW content must be tagged as such


Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress. Try /r/politicalhumor instead.

  • Rage comics - Go to /r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]micahismyname 264 points265 points ago

[–]Manjob 42 points43 points ago

The whole time I was distracted by watching how they were drawing and moving everything in Photoshop. The burden of being a digital painter.

[–]micahismyname 29 points30 points ago

Graphic designer here. My burden was finding out that the CERN meeting was presented in comic sans http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/4/3136652/cern-scientists-comic-sans-higgs-boson

[–]gct 20 points21 points ago

Those sick sons of bitches.

[–]bamboo_shoot 5 points6 points ago

Hehe CERN trolling. That's actually quite hilarious.

[–]Rediror 1 point2 points ago

Because, fuck you! We are talking about physics and the font of what is being transmitted through the projector equal less than of the importance of a quarks' fart

[–]Fuckthisuser 80 points81 points ago

Raises hand But why can't we have anti-gravity?

[–]AbasementPark 317 points318 points ago

Because you touch yourself at night.

[–]QuadFermented 59 points60 points ago

So... if Fuckthisuser stops touching himself at night... we get hoverboards? Oh. Dear. God.

[–]pescador7 56 points57 points ago

CUT OFF HIS HANDS! ... AND FEET!

[–]QuadFermented 7 points8 points ago

Dude, if you think he can't work it with prosthetics you are living in the past. Also, I just had the weirdest flashback to this scene (possibly NSFL if you are a weenie) in Titus Andronicus.

[–]aspiringvoiceactor 1 point2 points ago

Or more simply: Fuckthisuser is sentenced to be a eunuch.

[–]shillbert 1 point2 points ago

That's a little barbaric. Just get him magic Mormon underwear.

[–]MrRoughsex 1 point2 points ago

and tongue

[–]AdHom 6 points7 points ago

we're fucked

[–]Jumpin_Jack_Flash 1 point2 points ago

/r/NoFap

Fuckthisuser, humanity as a whole demands that you visit that subreddit.

[–]micahismyname 22 points23 points ago

Beats me, everything I know about physics comes from vimeo and youtube.

[–]dmshea 2 points3 points ago

because you touch yourself at night

beats me

clever

[–]ctrl_all_del 6 points7 points ago

one object would have to have negative mass? not too keen on my relativity but in newtonian physics let G be newton's gravitational constant. then the gravitational force between two objects is (G * mass1 * mass2)/r2 with r being the distance between the two objects

[–]sirbruce 1 point2 points ago

There are two types of mass -- gravitational mass and inertial mass. Gravitational mass is basically how gravity effects something. So if you could have a block that had negative gravitational mass, it would fall "up" because of the negative sign in the equation, thus appearing like anti-gravity.

Inertial mass is more like something inherent to the behavior of "stuff". You may remember for high school that the kinetic energy of something is 0.5 * m * v2. If the inertial mass were somehow negative, when ever you gave an object kinetic energy in a certain direction, the object would actually move in the opposite direction because of the negative sign. So if you pushed on it, it would have to push back against your hand with equal force, and you wouldn't actually be able to move it at all. It wouldn't make any physical sense.

Einstein showed that, at least in theory, gravitational mass and inertial mass are always equivalent. So either Einstein was wrong, and it's possible to give something negative gravitational mass without changing its inertial mass, or it's impossible in which case anti-gravity is probably impossible since it would lead to particles behaving in contradicting ways.

[–]Vectoor 17 points18 points ago

Great video, would recommend.

[–]muddzm 18 points19 points ago

Wow. Suddenly I'm smart and entertained.

[–]bullcityhomebrew 15 points16 points ago

I thought this was a good video too. Simplest explanation I've seen that made sense to me.

[–]almedmat 11 points12 points ago

That's Professor Whiteson! He flunked me freshman year in physics at UC Irvine...

[–]OyleSlyck 2 points3 points ago

I found Brian Greene's explanation easy to digest without feeling like a complete dunce.

http://worldsciencefestival.com/events/higgs_boson_announcement/main

[–]cassmonster 2 points3 points ago

I'm still wondering, why do they call it the god particle? Cause it gives atoms mass?

[–]SexistButterfly 5 points6 points ago

I think it came from a man who wrote a book on the subject and called it the god particle because he thought it was imaginary.

[–]Geno098 1 point2 points ago

So uh... I still don't get it. Why is this a big deal?

[–]lord_dude 673 points674 points ago

this is how i feel when i try to learn something from wikipedia

[–]redditor54 168 points169 points ago

Typical wiki research session:

look up complex subject

open link of a word I don't understand in new tab

10 minutes later

20 tabs open, haven't read a single page

[–]omgdonerkebab 55 points56 points ago

To be fair, that's how research used to be conducted in the old days, but instead of pages and links it was books and card catalogs. And possibly manservants.

[–]sheriff_skullface 42 points43 points ago

Yeah, researchers be flipping through scrolls like gandalf.

[–]Ass4ssinX 12 points13 points ago

I feel like Samwell looking for information on the Others.

[–]lord_dude 2 points3 points ago

at least they researched for a certain topic. in wikipedia you start to learn something about history and end up at an article about cooking

[–]avattt 1 point2 points ago

Tabs open, books open, manservants ...

Oh, I see.

[–]Firi 18 points19 points ago

open link of a word I don't understand in new tab

For those of you interested in learning and sharing useful words, try /r/vocabulary. I'm trying to revive it.

[–]hardlyathletic 1 point2 points ago

Subscribed!

[–]dj_bizarro 1 point2 points ago

Is there an /r/punctuation ?

[–]scantics 405 points406 points ago

Especially anything in higher mathematics.

[–][deleted] 371 points372 points ago

Wikipedia is really useful for higher mathematics....if you can already understand it. That's the really sad part about wiki mathematics, it's usually written by mathematicians for mathematicians.

[–]FCalleja 227 points228 points ago

That's what simple wikipedia is for! http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

[–]I_Am_Not_An_Expert 124 points125 points ago

I use this when inebriated.

I love browsing Wikipedia so much, but sometimes it's nice to dumb it down.

[–]4_word_replies_only 53 points54 points ago

It has expert advice.

[–]ecmmyers 18 points19 points ago

It's got what plants crave!

[–]caseyfw 2 points3 points ago

Which is good.

[–]SolomonGomes 90 points91 points ago

I still don't get it.

[–]MrVandalous 3 points4 points ago

[–]MiamiFootball 5 points6 points ago

i'm reasonably sure the following is somewhat accurate:

think of a fish tank. fish live in the water. the water is made up of individual molecules.

in relation to our world, the water is the higgs field and those individual molecules are higgs bosons. those bosons affect other particles.

the discovery is important because it helps explain why certain particles have particular properties (having mass) when one would generally think that they shouldnt

[–]Aderakun 17 points18 points ago

From what I understand the highs particle attracts other particles within the Higgs zone or whatever wiki called t, I don't remember the exact term. From there it starts to gain mass because if the particles it attracts but also losses kinetic energy but instead of losing the energy it becomes conserved into mass energy. There was a picture that explained the process in a simple way. I'll post it if I can find it.

[–]BallsackTBaghard 46 points47 points ago

So...time travel? or what

[–]Jigsus 16 points17 points ago

Ghost field makes speedy things stay speedy

[–]Skylarity 18 points19 points ago

Speedy thing goes in, speedy thing comes out.

[–]220V-50Hz3WRoHS 38 points39 points ago

Exactly. The Higgs boson also allows us to invent neverending perpetual motion machines that don't lose energy. Also teleport. It's one heck of a science day.

[–]RUPTURED_ASSHOLE 27 points28 points ago

Hmm and 2015 is coming up. Not looking to bad for Back to the Future fanboys.

[–]CptOfTheGravyTrain 20 points21 points ago

So, it contradicts our laws of thermodynamics? Interesting...

[–]a_lowercase_A 3 points4 points ago

[–]anthrocide 11 points12 points ago

Let's say I walk into a room full of the press/media. I'm not important so I could walk across the room without anyone flocking to me. Now imagine if president Obama walked into the room, just imagine how the media would flock around him as he made his way to the other side of the room. In this analogy, Obama is the Higgs boson.

EDIT: Got my references wrong, read VoodooSteve's comment for the correction.

[–]VoodooSteve 9 points10 points ago

I think you meant the media is actually the Higgs field, it's what gives Obama mass and slows him down. In this analogy, the Higgs boson is then an individual reporter I suppose.

[–]mamjjasond 11 points12 points ago

I understand what is being said, but I need an explanation of why anyone would believe that any of this is true. When I read things like this:

Bosons are the second type of elementary particle in the Standard Model. All bosons have an integer spin (1, 2, 3, etc..) so many of them can be in the same place at the same time.

(source)

... it's like, yeeaaaa, suuure, okaaay. Nothing like integers to make things be in the same place at the same time, right .....?????

[–]HanWolo 4 points5 points ago

Why would someone believe any of it is true? Rough question. If you can understand really high level mathematics it's extremely compelling. If you can't it's almost entirely beyond one's grasp to find proof.

The long and short of it is that all predictions made using a model that includes the higgs boson can be tested in a lab with exceptionally high rates of success and accuracy. Furthermore, the theoretical physics behind it allow for some extremely complex problems to be resolved; these problems are solved with a particle (higgs boson) that has also been shown experimentally to fall in line perfectly with what is predicted.

So why would you believe it? I don't know how good you are at math, if you're not that great, you just have to trust people aren't lying to you. If you can trust them, then you can believe what they're saying which is they've essentially proven that it's true beyond a shadow of a doubt by doing billions of tests.

[–]IFoundTheHiggs 1 point2 points ago

I found the thing, and I don't get it either.

[–]IDidntChooseUsername 5 points6 points ago

So, wait a little... Everything is made of particles?

[–]Dragoonie 11 points12 points ago

[–]sugarhoneybadger 1 point2 points ago

That read like science fiction. Sort of understand except the Higgs Field sounds a lot like The Force to me.

[–]Condorcet_Winner 16 points17 points ago

I love how condescending some of the articles are.

[–]butwhynotmoremath 4 points5 points ago

You have to be condescending if youre a phd physicist trying to explain particle physics to laymen. Like, they can't just talk to the audience as if they are equal because they are not. Whats worse is internet people who think being able to give a flawed simplified analogy for a physics concept means they "know" it and being condescending to those who can't.

[–]Joelpk 1 point2 points ago

The CompSci one is guilty of this http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_science

For example: "There are many different areas in computer science. Some of the areas consider problems in a more abstract way. Some areas need special machines, called computers".

[–]GJCaesar1138 1 point2 points ago

That's my favorite technique in being condescending on the Internet. Link them to Simple.Wikipedia

[–]Liara_cant_act 14 points15 points ago

Best laughs in a week came from the first paragraph to Quantum Mechanics - Simple English Wikipedia:

To learn Quantum mechanics (QM) is to learn about matter and energy. The main things to learn are subatomic particles (things smaller than atoms) and electromagnetic waves (waves that are made of electric and magnetic parts). Quantum mechanics explains how these things behave with each other. The ideas of quantum mechanics are very difficult to understand. Hard mathematics is used to study subatomic particles and electromagnetic waves because they act in very strange ways. Quantum mechanics is important to physics and chemistry....Photons are particles, much smaller than the smallest speck of dust.

[–]IronWaffled 12 points13 points ago

Dear god this is so useful! No longer will I fear searching advanced nuclear physics on wikipedia!

[–]ebv89j39hj234890j892 7 points8 points ago

Checked to see if all links led back to Philosophy. They don't. Instead, they enter an infinite loop at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word loosely via "body", "tree", "animal", "life", and "definition". I can't help but think this is significant.

[–]Seber 4 points5 points ago

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Hanzimaundrell 1 point2 points ago

yeah but using simple wikipedia sometimes means too simple and you always feel like a bit of a dumbass for some reason.

[–]Monarki 1 point2 points ago

OMW this is amazing! Years ago I gave up going to wiki for info on anything scientific. This greatly helps, Thanks! Have no idea why you were downvoted.

[–]mrm3x1can 1 point2 points ago

I prefer going straight to Kahn Academy if I'm trying to learn or understand something, math specifically.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points ago

I used wikis while studying statistics and probability. I do not recommend this for people unfamiliar with mathematical concepts. The wiki articles are simple once you already understand what they say.

Look up z-score or p-value. Their definitions could be so much simpler. In concept, they are not nearly as complicated as Wikipedia makes them seem. Once understood in concept, their symbology is much more intuitive.

Wikipedia could correct this problem the same way that math courses do. The main page for any concept should link to four pages: layperson, beginner, intermediate, and advanced. The layperson article should have zero equations and use as few words as possible, the beginner should use the simplest forms of the concept, mathematically, intermediate should cover the theorems and historical information, and advanced should cover alternate approaches and open problems.

If Wikipedia were reformatted this way then people could use it to teach themselves math efficiently, and since teachers sometimes fail to teach concepts effectively before moving on to the math, this would make it an invaluable tool to students.

[–]shimlamirch 1 point2 points ago

this comment is worthy of being its own front page link.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

Thank you, but I doubt it would fly lol... Plus it's not at all my idea. I just took it one step further by suggesting a solution.

What would fly is if a group of mathematicians and students worked together to make this happen and the users on Wikipedia let it happen. Laypersons who are neither mathematicians nor students could help by pointing out what they don't understand on the layperson pages.

I wish I had both the attention span and talent to organize this. I'd make it my life's purpose until it got done. I have the horrible fault, though, of working on big projects in widely-separated spurts of intense work. That approach fails outright in group projects. When I break from this habit, there comes a point where the quality of my work rapidly decays.

If you (or any other reader) could format this properly to spark it then you're welcome to without any need to cite my comment. Since the study of math is a lifelong aspiration of mine that I'm sure will last long enough to merit that descriptor, I would be deeply indebted to those who make it happen.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points ago

khanacademy.org ftw.

[–]RAPT0RJESUS 9 points10 points ago

Nice try Genghis but you reign of terror ended centuries ago.

[–]AngelixArch 6 points7 points ago

What sucks is that you can't understand higher mathematics without actually studying lower stuff before you get there... And it's not an overnight process... It makes me sad because all those numbers and variables look so damn interesting in all those heavy-weight physics books! :(

[–]ubercow13 1 point2 points ago

That really makes sense though, doesn't it? I mean what use is an encyclopaedia article on functional analysis or Galois theory for someone who doesn't have the background to really understand the topic?

[–]Milsivich 1 point2 points ago

Ya I never went to college or anything, but the other day I tried to create a model for the probability cloud densities of a set of 4 electrons around a carbon nucleus with respect to time, and Wikipedia totally sucked for that

[–]redsoxthoughts 6 points7 points ago

[–]set_it_up 1 point2 points ago

I know what you mean; it's ridiculously hard.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago

Wikipedia can be a real disappointment at times, the whole point of Wikipedia is to educate, and it's up to the educator to explain it properly to the learner, which is very difficult when it's written by someone with so much knowledge in the field that they write it for other people with a similar understanding. Simplepedia is not popular enough, we should have a global "fill up Simplepedia" day, or convince Jimbo Wales to split up articles into different levels of difficulty.

The latter is something I've wanted on Wikipedia for ages now.

Also I'm shattered so sorry if that wasn't worded great.

[–]Lanza21 5 points6 points ago

Wikipedia fucking sucks. The authors of anything beyond freshman in college level have no idea how to communicate. It's really pathetic. Every single thing is described as an amalgamation of higher level and harder to understand concepts.

[–]linlorienelen 3 points4 points ago

Try Simple Wikipedia.

[–]SuperdociousVillain 1 point2 points ago

Same here. I end up opening all of the highlighted words that I do not understand, then I forget what I was researching to begin with.

[–]Tyrant718 1 point2 points ago

There's an Chrome app for that.

[–]BunsOfAluminum 1 point2 points ago

Try switching your language in the left navigation bar from English to Simple English. It sometimes gives you a more layman-friendly article.

[–]Wonderjea 1 point2 points ago

hell, I felt this way on the first semester for my Marketing major!

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]SolomonGomes 118 points119 points ago

Now that they've discovered the Higgs Boson i'm seeing them everywhere. One bit me on the leg this morning. True story.

[–]captionUnderstanding 27 points28 points ago

Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon.

You've probably heard about that phenomenon really recently.

[–]SolomonGomes 7 points8 points ago

It was only yesterday.

[–]usedtowork 30 points31 points ago

the only honest submitter on reddit

[–]chum_guzzler 21 points22 points ago

What episode is this? Want to watch...

[–]diuge 1 point2 points ago

One of my favorite episodes.

I called my parents after watching it and thanked them for working shitty jobs.

[–]catsbaconronpaul 51 points52 points ago

[–]unwanted_puppy 24 points25 points ago

haha my go to gif http://i.imgur.com/3M9vP.gif

[–]Lewpa 1 point2 points ago

Welcome to Good Burger, home of the good burger. Can I take your order?

[–]ConorPF 111 points112 points ago

I missed a day of Reddit so I feel left out, what the hell is Higgs Boson?

[–]Uncoolio 262 points263 points ago

It's the thing that makes my shit so massive.

[–]derusion 118 points119 points ago

no, that's fiber.

[–]DFP_ 5 points6 points ago

Technically this is true.

[–]sje46 13 points14 points ago

...the funny thing is that this is actually true. The Higgs Boson is what gives things mass.

(and yes, I understood this is what you meant, but for those that didn't understand).

[–]Yodamanjaro 8 points9 points ago

No, we aren't referring to those cheap burritos you always seem to eat.

[–]ep1032 41 points42 points ago

http://vimeo.com/41038445

Really great explanatory video created by the guy who does PhD comics

[–]itsprobablytrue 19 points20 points ago

Great video but still not quite getting it

[–]playerIII 1 point2 points ago

I was waiting for something like this to pop up somewhere.

[–]ToddOfAwesome 1 point2 points ago

Wow, that video completely changed my perspective on what mass actually is.

[–]luckyjinxer 1 point2 points ago

Thats great, but when do I get my new matter sphere, bolt and chord? Or what practical developments in technology can these discoveries lead to that will change my life? Are we on the verge of entering the subatomic age?

[–]DFP_ 10 points11 points ago

It's been described as the thing which gives other particles their mass. That's all I can say definitively.

[–]-G-O-D- 51 points52 points ago

Its bullshit if you ask me.

[–]Darrian 15 points16 points ago

I thought this was funny as shit if it makes you feel better about the downvotes

[–]1123581321345589144b 42 points43 points ago

I am not a physicist, but I am a scientist in general. I think viewing what this is all about is not that difficult if done conceptually. Basically, if you imagine some stuff that likes to interact with it self, and when it does it releases energy, like heat or radiation, that stuff is what makes up everything we know physically. If you keep cutting up the stuff into smaller and smaller pieces, the energy associated with cutting it up becomes amazingly large fast. What this means is that there are various forces operating at various length scales, and these correspond to different energy scales. In the beginning, energy was plentiful, or in other words, all of the tiniest of stuff was separated. As it came together loads of energy was released, like heat or radiation, and that stuff became what we now know as matter. Therefore, in order to investigate that really tiny stuff in its separated stuffyness, we have to input loads of energy. Hence the 125 GeV energy number. The chemical reactions that you are more likely familiar with dance about an energy value of +/- 3 eV. Like when you burn something you release maybe 3 eV of energy per molecule as it burns. These changes are all sort of the same thing, but on vastly different energy and length scales. In chemical reactions we are dealing with moving electrons and protons around. In the CERN experiments, they are concerned with moving the stuff around within a single proton. Anyways, the summary is that over vast length scales there spans great changes of energy. As one goes to smaller and smaller things, the energy skyrockets. Some of the smallest and tightest bound things are the things that CERN is studying. Basically, looking back to the time of the big bang where everything was separated or in other words at exceedingly high energy. Anyways, again, my two cents from a non-particle physicist, but form someone who understands that concepts are best understood without mathematics confusing or inhibiting the more grand picture.

[–]crazycrave95 9 points10 points ago

I read this. And I will upvote you. For the effort, y'know?

You can't help that I'm stupid and incapable of comprehending this. I'm sure there are some swell things up there. :)

[–]Exaskryz 2 points3 points ago

Just for people to get some sort of reference... 1 GeV=1 billion eV. So, the 125 GeV that it took to find the Higgs at is almost 42 billion times higher in energy than the chemical reactions #####b mentioned.

[–]sirbruce 1 point2 points ago

Also, when particle physicists used the term GeV (or MeV, etc.), they really mean GeV/c2. It's often customary in physics to make c=1 just to simplify the math.

[–]isaliar 8 points9 points ago

I have no idea what it is. I just know that a guy cried over it so it must be big.

[–]32koala 3 points4 points ago

I believe that guy was Higgs. You know...Higgs...Higgs particle...

[–]Sentient545 8 points9 points ago

Here's the basic explanation I used for a few friends of mine who didn't know what was going on.

...I am far from an expert, so if I screw any of this up someone smarter is welcome to correct me.

All matter is made up of Atoms; which are themselves made up of Protons, Neutrons, and Electrons. Protons and Neutrons are also made up of something called Quarks. Electrons are not composed of anything smaller and are a member of a group called Leptons.

So at the very smallest level we have Quarks, and Leptons; however, there is also something else called Bosons. These Boson particles are responsible for the fundamental forces that allow Quarks and Leptons to interact with each other. These forces are: Electromagnetic, weak nuclear, strong nuclear, mass, and maybe gravity. The Higgs boson is the particle responsible for mass; it is heavier than the other particles and interacts with a special field called the Higgs field in a unique way.

The Higgs field is an invisible force (similar to a magnetic field) that affects all particles. Lighter ones such as Photons pass through it easily, but heavier ones like the Higgs boson face resistance and sort of drag the field with them (think of it like ripples on the surface of a pond.) This interaction between the Boson and the field is responsible for giving matter its mass.

Now the discovery of this particle is important because up until now its existence was only theorized, but it was required to confirm our model of fundamental particles (all the stuff I just explained.) It is basically the last hole we needed to fill in our periodic table of realities make-up.

The Higgs was hard to discover because of its high energy (125 GeV) and the fact that it only exists for a small fraction of time before decaying into lighter Photon particles. The LHC (Large Hadron Collider) was built for the very specific purpose of finding this specific particle; it cost 7 billion dollars and took around 30 years to get it up and operational. It has finally served its primary purpose.

So that's basically it in a nutshell; the discovery of the so-called "God particle."

Now you know, and knowing is half the battle.

[–]Plasticbob3 1 point2 points ago

Wow. After watching all videos people posted about it, I read this and it finally clicked.

[–]EGriffi5 7 points8 points ago

Came to post this, beaten to the punch once again.

One day I will be the first to post a helpful link....one day....

[–]aspiringvoiceactor 2 points3 points ago

I like the way you are EGriffi

[–]JohnPoe 5 points6 points ago

I know, what's with the mass hysteria? I don't know why the media is spending so much energy on this story. Does it really matter that much?

[–]blowback 3 points4 points ago

Seriously, they instantly lepton it.

[–]JohnPoe 2 points3 points ago

Kind of quarky, I suspect they've lost their convections gravitating on a story like this.

[–]mcbain666 6 points7 points ago

[–]Jeroknite 4 points5 points ago

Your first mistake was trying to look up marketing, instead of science. Your second mistake was being a fictional character.

[–]whittlemedownz 3 points4 points ago

How I feel today trying to follow the Higgs boson stuff as a physicist trying to understand anything outside my field.

[–]Friendly-Uncle 8 points9 points ago

Spot on.

[–]davegod 3 points4 points ago

[–]Redditastophe 3 points4 points ago

I always joke with my friends that Quantum Mechanics are the study of magic, since viewing an experiment can change the outcome.

So today, I've just assumed we've discovered mana and moved on.

[–]Fluxdada 3 points4 points ago

Hmmm. Yeah! I know some of these words!

[–]rssfrrst 9 points10 points ago

Well for starters, it's not got a lot to do with marketing

[–]heywhatwhat 9 points10 points ago

It seems you have much to learn about academic publishing.

[–]reagan2016 2 points3 points ago

I gave up on trying to understand it. I'm turning to religion for answers instead.

[–]calj 2 points3 points ago

Read this.

Edit: Also just found this comment from "TomChivers"

"First things first: the "Higgs boson" is a distraction. The easiest thing to think of is the "Higgs field". Like light has light waves and also light particles (photons). They were looking for the boson, the particle, because that's what they'd be able to spot. But the easiest way for you to think of it is as a field, like a magnetic field.

An analogy might be with planes and air. Big heavy planes move slowly through the air, because they're not very streamlined. Little fighter jets move more easily, because they are streamlined. But if they were in space, it wouldn't matter how streamlined they were: in a vacuum, the streamlining is irrelevant.

The Higgs field (in a very vaguely analogous way) does the same with matter. Before the Higgs field formed (about a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang), all particles flew around at the speed of light, because they had nothing to slow them down, like planes in vacuum. But once it formed, the heavy particles suddenly found they were flying through a treacly field, and had to slow down, like planes in air. Others - the photon - had no mass, and so carried on flying around at the same speed. The reason that heavy things are harder to push than light things is because they are less "streamlined" in this Higgs field than lighter things.

The Higgs particle, in this analogy, is like an oxygen or nitrogen molecule in the air: it's the particle that creates the air, but we can think of the air as a fluid."

[–]daguy11 147 points148 points ago

Don't worry, I'd guess over 99% of the people in Reddit just act like they're interested in/understand scientific developments because they think it makes them cooler, sound smarter, and enables them to join in on another Reddit circlejerk.

[–]brettaburger 649 points650 points ago

I don't think there's anything wrong with applauding scientific advancement even if you don't fully understand it. Call it a circlejerk all you want but it's really not a bad thing.

EDIT: Obviously it's not good to jump to conclusions or make wild assumptions when you don't understand something. I'm talking about the people who might skim through the article, think "good work!" leave an upvote and move on. People like me.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Sit-Down_Comedian 51 points52 points ago

It's not a circlejerk. He's just an angry idiot. This kind of widespread interest in what these discoveries are and what they mean is one of the only things left to give us hope that we'll pull ourselves out of this cynical, anti-intellectual funk that at the very least the US is stuck in (and we're dragging other nations down with us). It's people being excited about this that will prevent another Dark Ages. It's my professional opinion that people like him should keep their mouth shut unless they can add to the conversation.

Go look at the statistics of where we are in the world rankings of science and mathematics and see if we really need this guy flapping his gums about science circlejerking.

[–]midnightbean 6 points7 points ago

One of the basic components of a flawed system is not seeing any error in itself. And a basic flaw in the States that causes this intellectual funk is actually similar to how Reddit behaves. That is fast paced, quickly assuming, over confident, occupied with novelty and silly jokes, and lastly a distain for criticism unless it's about things which it deems as important (very exclusivistic).

This poster is merely pointing out the flaw in following trends, thats for sheep and sleepy people. And really, that's what Reddit is. I mean, you'd have to be crazy to try and argue that it has wide ranging opinions. This here what Ive written will most likely be downvoted into the negative before it even gets read.

[–]troubleondemand 19 points20 points ago

Yeah. Just like that time they landed on the moon. The only reason anyone paid attention to that was because they wanted to talk about it, seem interested and cool.

[–]funnynamegoeshere 13 points14 points ago

You should be a dick about it, then! That'll get people interested!

[–]Vitalic123 19 points20 points ago

I really hope you're not actually discrediting the importance of public intrest in science, because it sounds like you are.

[–]JackRubysGun 5 points6 points ago

I actually think there are quite a few people here who are actually trying hard to learn. This shit blows my mind, I can barely wrap my head around the concept of 'spin' much less come close to speaking the language of particle physicists. If I want to learn about something like this I'm coming to reddit because people actually are talking about things like this, some ideas and analogies about an immensely complicated subject are being created and discarded in real time and I can actually consume information with some discretion regarding sources. You can call it a circlejerk but you are here and I'm here and look there is something in your hand.

[–]chill613 5 points6 points ago

For those of us who weren't born with the knowledge of elementary particles and physics; http://vimeo.com/41038445

[–]mochamocha 4 points5 points ago

What's wrong with being interested in scientific developments in fields other my own? I don't know what led you to think that public interest in science is "pretentious elitism", but this is a very dangerous line of thought.

[–]sytar6 3 points4 points ago

I think this is a really poisonous anti-intellectual sentiment. It ties together low social worth with an interest in science. Now every time someone on Reddit acts interested in science, people will be wondering, "are they really interested in science? or are they feel they need to try to 'act cool'?"

I say let's give everyone the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps I'm projecting, but I think most people here are just as interested in science as they claim.

[–]32koala 5 points6 points ago

people in Reddit just act like they're interested in/understand scientific developments because they think it makes them cooler

Yes, because nothing lets the ladies know you're cool like long, technical discussions fundamental particles — gauge bosons, no less!

[–]jonnyrotten7 31 points32 points ago

Reddit: the pinnacle of intellectualism. We are smarter, more enlightened, and more cultured than the unwashed masses.

[–]snarkinator 52 points53 points ago

... humanity is fucked.

[–]ICanLegoThat 228 points229 points ago

[–]KamikazeKumquat 32 points33 points ago

Where has this novelty been all my Reddit life?

[–]snarkinator 14 points15 points ago

My hero.

[–]Enjoyitbeforeitsover 2 points3 points ago

Why do I hear Andy's voice from Toy Story... Muah muah muah muah... (Ages 3 and Up!)

[–]moderndayvigilante 4 points5 points ago

At first I was like "Where the fuck did you find that picture?" .. then it all made sense.

[–]NanoGeek 3 points4 points ago

You should be getting paid for this!

[–]JoshuaIan 6 points7 points ago

You are going places.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]az4z3l 3 points4 points ago

...

...

Community isn't easily consumable?

[–]EntingFantastic 6 points7 points ago

Due it to its meta-specific nature, you can't just walk into an episode halfway through a season and understand all of the references as you could with TBBT.

[–]Conradfr 2 points3 points ago

Well I try to understand science, and am satisfied I can get get even a tiny bit of it.

And you don't need to fully understand something to know that it exists.

[–]___stairs 2 points3 points ago

I guess you're the 1% then.

[–]RubeusShagrid 4 points5 points ago

Well that's rather presumptuous. I'm no scientist, but I have a fair understanding as to what the HB particle is, as well as what it represents. I do not claim to fully grasp it, but that does not mean that I'm wrong to celebrate its discovery.

[–]LetsGetRamblin 1 point2 points ago

I'm an intelligent person, I've been reading about this stuff for two days, and all I've come up with is that it's really, really important.

[–]MrE2Me 1 point2 points ago

The wiki page on Higgs boson actually has an article written in laymans terms.

Here it is

[–]fruitymasta 1 point2 points ago

So...who 'can' describe this to the rest of us simple minded folks in layman's terms?

[–]bnguyen1114 1 point2 points ago

In the same boat. I can't really say I understand it, but I'm glad we're making scientific discoveries and stuff. I could talk about the evolution of sharks and dinosaurs and stuff but this completely goes over my head

[–]xenarcher 1 point2 points ago

Perhaps this video will prove enlightening for some folks here.

[–]opaque22 1 point2 points ago

I'm just happy you didn't use the good burger image.

[–]You-Can-Quote-Me 1 point2 points ago

Should have changed the dictionary image to include the definition of Higgs Boson, otherwise I score this 9/10, good work.

[–]jalien 1 point2 points ago

[–]hckygod91 1 point2 points ago

i find myself understanding parts of all the explanations, but the important parts make me feel like a child lol

[–]Motarded_Rider 1 point2 points ago

This reminds me of when I first attempted to read up on quantum entanglement. So fucking true.

[–]oxygn 1 point2 points ago

WHERE'S THE PICTURE OF THE DICTIONARY IN THE GARBAGE???

[–]loomie 1 point2 points ago

Thank you sir... It's the first time in years someone really made me laugh out loud without just acting like its funny!

[–]latin_gravitas 1 point2 points ago

[–]secondforever 1 point2 points ago

What episode is this???

[–]StoicGunner 1 point2 points ago

So I'm not the only one? Thank goodness. I thought I was a dumbass.

[–]cruel_angels_thesis 1 point2 points ago

John Titor shall return.

[–]brokendimension 1 point2 points ago

Wikipedia just made things worse.

[–]Shalaiyn 1 point2 points ago

Think of the Higgs field as the ocean, and every Higgs boson is a molecule of water.

When you're in water, you move kinda hard, there's a resistance. This happens to particles in the Higgs field, and the more resistance they meet against the Higgs field, the more massive these particles are.

[–]A_Chewy_Lemon 1 point2 points ago

Could anyone explain what the Higgs Boson is and what it means for science as if I was a five year old with down syndrome and ate paste.

[–]Ixilary 2 points3 points ago

Well Jimmy, the Higgs Boson is very very special to us.

[–]littlejohnnyjewel 1 point2 points ago

STILL no word on how this information is going is going to give us flying cars...:(

[–]jcal9 1 point2 points ago

""Why don't you explain this to me like I'm five.- Michael Scott" - jcal9

[–]LRP 1 point2 points ago

I still have no idea WTF happened. I leave for a few hours and all of the sudden everyone's talking about some Higgs boson.

[–]daveruiz 1 point2 points ago

I was thinking a bit more like when Homer had to have his triple bypass

Dr. Hibbert: Homer, I'm afraid you'll have to undergo a coronary bypass operation.

Homer : Say it in English, Doc!

Dr. Hibbert: You're going to need open-heart surgery.

Homer : Spare me your medical mumbo jumbo!

Dr. Hibbert: We're going to cut you open and tinker with your ticker.

Homer : Could you dumb it down a shade?