If you want some serious critiquing, read on. Not meant to offend, just trying to help you get your point across better.

Good direction, but I think it's too soon. Except in Arizona or whatever state is saying a human exists two weeks before conception.

The argument is that a fertilised egg is a human. But the eggs shown are not yet zygotes/embryos (head of sperm has not yet entered the egg). The nut hasn't sprouted, and the silk has not yet been woven into cloth.

And then from a graphics/aesthetics perspective, the first three photos are wayyyy too cluttered.