this post was submitted on
2 points (53% like it)
16 up votes 14 down votes

atheism

subscribe1,338,360 readers

2,887 users here now


Book excerpt preview

The reddit admins were sent an excerpt of chapter one of Penn Jillette's new book for r/atheism to preview.

cover | chapter excerpt | discuss

Welcome to r/atheism, the web's largest atheist forum. All topics related to atheism, agnosticism and secular living are welcome here. Please read our FAQ.

Please link directly to any images or use imgur to avoid being flagged as blogspam

Recommended reading and viewing

Thank you notes


Related Subreddits <--the big list

GodlessWomen YoungAtheists AtheistParents
BlackAtheism AtheistGems DebateAnAtheist
skeptic agnostic freethought
antitheism humanism Hitchens
a6theism10 tfbd AdviceAtheists
AtheistVids atheismbot secularstudents

Events
11/9-11 Skepticon - Springfield MO
2/8-10 NTS Convention - Dallas TX
3/28-31 AA Convention - Austin
Giving
DWB/MSF fundraiser
Kiva lending team
FBB's Appeal to Freethinkers to Fight Cancer
Camp Quest
Ex* Groups
ex-Muslim ex-Catholic ex-Mormon
ex-JW ex-Jew ex-SistersinZion
ex-Bahai ex-Christian ex-Adventist
Assistance
Coming Out
Atheist Havens
Start an Atheist Club at Your School

Chat: #reddit-atheism on irc.freenode.net

Watch: #/r/atheism on reddit.tv

Read The FAQ


Submit Rage Comic

Submit Facebook Chat

Submit Meme

Submit Something Else

Read The FAQ

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 4 comments

[–]romad20000 0 points1 point ago

Shit have you tried the atheist manifesto or God is not great. Shit with hitchens I have to read it with a dictionary and an Encyclopedia.

[–]davorzdralo 0 points1 point ago

Hitchens does use some pretty crazy terminology, but I have found God Delusion to be pretty simple, to be honest. Perhaps it's the knowledge of various sciences, I don't know, but I never really had a need to look up anything. On the other hand, Hitch was more about philosophy/politics, and threw plenty of curve-balls. And than, of course, there is a problem of me not being a native English speaker, which becomes much more apparent when it comes to nonscientific subjects, as most of the world shares the same scientific jargon.

[–]romad20000 0 points1 point ago

With hitchens he assumes to much knowledge on the part of the reader. He has a penchant for talking about obscure topics as if they were common knowledge. Dawkins was harder for me though. I grew up in a fundamentalist environment so I never had much exposure to science growing up. It wasn't until college that I realized how much I had missed out on.

[–]davorzdralo 0 points1 point ago

I grew up in a middle of the civil war, with no electricity for several years, and one of my only pastimes was reading books my family owned, and fortunately for me, there was some pretty good material in there. At the age of 10, I was a walking encyclopedia, so I didn't have that problem, although I did have some other gaps in my knowledge because of that...