this post was submitted on
785 points (64% like it)
1,713 up votes 928 down votes

atheism

subscribe1,133,126 readers

859 users here now


Help Atheist Organizations!

The Secular Student Alliance, Camp Quest, and Foundation Beyond Belief were all nominated for the Chase Community Giving program, which awards grants based on the votes of the public. Everyone gets 2 votes on Facebook, plus an additional one if they share a CCG page. The links for them are:

SSA | CQ | FBB

Voting runs from September 6-19


Welcome to r/atheism, the web's largest atheist forum. All topics related to atheism, agnosticism and secular living are welcome here. Please read our FAQ.

New posts: New Rising
Self posts: New Relevant
Non-image posts: New Relevant

Recommended reading and viewing

Thank you notes


Related Subreddits <--the big list

GodlessWomen YoungAtheists AtheistParents
BlackAtheism AtheistGems DebateAnAtheist
skeptic agnostic freethought
antitheism humanism Hitchens
a6theism10 tfbd AdviceAtheists

Events
10/5-6 NAPCON2012 - Boston
08/11 Regional Conference - St. Paul MN
Giving
DWB/MSF fundraiser
Kiva lending team
FBB's Appeal to Freethinkers to Fight Cancer
Camp Quest
Ex* Groups
ex-Muslim ex-Catholic ex-Mormon
ex-JW ex-Jew ex-SistersinZion
ex-Bahai ex-Christian ex-Adventist
Assistance
Coming Out
Atheist Havens
Start an Atheist Club at Your School

Chat: #reddit-atheism on irc.freenode.net

Watch: #/r/atheism on reddit.tv

Read The FAQ


Submit Rage Comic

Submit Facebook Chat

Submit Meme

Submit Something Else

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 311

[–]spoondragon 15 points16 points ago

Let me just use a scribbley narrow font on this speckly background for maximum readability

[–]GpGuy 28 points29 points ago

You realize that your poster's logic can be used to imply that verbal bullying of atheists and gays is okay, right?

just saying.

[–]shadowplyr 13 points14 points ago

agreed, if this is true then i can call you a faggot dick sucking homosexual as long as i respect your choice to suck penis

[–]Elided_Ego 1 point2 points ago

This needs to be tailored into an almost pc redneck meme.

[–]shadowplyr 0 points1 point ago

lol thanks

[–]the_hoser 2 points3 points ago

Well... why not? What's wrong with that? I mean, you may be burning bridges between yourself and potential friends, but there's nothing wrong with that.

[–]shadowplyr 8 points9 points ago

if we are so overly ambitious about changing perspective and making it wrong to call people derogatory terms. than you arnt truly respecting someones choice if you tell them it is wrong. especially on something like religion or human sexuality, there is no right or wrong, there are opinions. however saying your religion is bullshit is not an example of the "tolerance" that we are trying to inscribe in america today. while yes, you have the right to say it. why be an asshole and say it? if you are gay, its your choice (not getting into the "its genetic" debate lets just say as an example) and that is fine, it might disgust me i might not care, but telling you that it is wrong is the improper thing to do if we are trying to show tolerance. so you worship a spaghetti monster? cool. i dont agree, but why tell you i dont agree when it does NOTHING to further the bond between you and me? it will only make me think you are an asshole for thinking you have the right to tell me something i believe in is wrong.

[–]the_hoser -1 points0 points ago

I never said you had to respect their choice, and neither did OP. We merely must respect their right to choose.

Lets compare religion and homosexuality (though I loathe to do so)

Lets look at all the things that Homosexuals do not do that religious people do do:

  1. Homosexuals do not expect everyone to adhere to the same rules that they have to adhere to.
  2. Homosexuals do not try to use their condition as proof that heterosexuals are wrong.
  3. Homosexuals do not cover up or downplay the terrible acts committed by members of their homosexual sects to preserve the good name of their sexual orientation.
  4. Homosexuals do not maintain tax exempt status for what is essentially a highly profitable business.
  5. Homosexuals do not start wars over other people's sexual orientation.
  6. Homosexuals do not oppress and hedge out heterosexuals to take control of their holy land (though, this makes a fantastic premise for a movie... protecting the gay holy land!)

I could go on, but if you haven't gotten the point by now, then I doubt you ever will.

[–]fuckbeingorginal 4 points5 points ago

I'm religious.

  1. I do not expect everyone to adhere to my faith.

  2. I do not try to engage atheists in religious debate about them being wrong. Philosophy is a personal journey.

  3. I do not disagree with the fact that members of the religious community have committed terrible acts.

  4. I do not donate to churches, only selected non-profit organizations.

  5. I have never started a war.

  6. I have never stopped, nor believe in stopping, someone over there beliefs and actions as long as they do not interfere with the lives of others/etc.

  7. I respect other people and look into their beliefs/opinions/arguments. I have studied Christianity/Islam/Judaism/Hinduism/Tao and other religious philosophy. If I do not agree with something, I analyze, interpret, and move on.

  8. I don't belittle someone on the grounds of their beliefs. Merely on their actions.

I could go on, but if you haven't gotten the point by now, then I doubt you ever will.

[–]Tikao 0 points1 point ago

can i call you wicked? cor 6:14

[–]the_hoser -3 points-2 points ago

Just because you're religious and do not commit these crimes does not mean that other religious have not done so in the name of their (and possibly your) religion. If it were just a matter of "be nice, don't talk about it", we wouldn't be having this discussion.

[–]fuckbeingorginal 1 point2 points ago

In the atheist community on reddit, people are beginning to feel it is a matter of "be nice." As I said, don't belittle someone on the grounds of their beliefs. Merely on their actions.

I took an Introduction to Islamic Fundamentalism class my senior year of high school. It wasn't about Islamic fundamentalist terrorists. It was about what was at the heart of Islam. (for example the veil and covering of women was not/is not a Muhammad espousal what have you. It goes back to the cultures of the region in which the religion was founded, dating back to the Persians. Though it has been incorporated by many Islamic sects, it is not practiced by many Muslims)

I believe many religious sects have diverged away from what the heirs of the religions ascribed too. I love the example that many republicans worship a man who was a socialist jew who believed in giving to the poor, living modestly, paying taxes, and loving thy neighbor and thy enemy -loving everybody. In these regards, yes we need to get rid of the damn catholic church among others.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Why in the everloving fuck should I not belittle someone based on their beliefs?

If you think the earth is flat, I have to respect it as long as you don't try to cut off funding from satellites because orbits don't exist?

If you think leeches cure the consumption, I have to respect it as long as you don't charge money from people for your services?

If you think mental illness is invented and a result of alien spirits stuck in your soul, I have to respect it as long as you don't tell Brooke Shields to stop treating her post-partum depression with medication?

Beliefs are opinions. I don't have to respect your beliefs about anything. I don't have to respect your political beliefs, or your economic beliefs, or your beliefs about the celestial origin of morality.

If you don't want your beliefs held up to scrutiny, keep them to yourself. Don't go claiming your sacrosanct beliefs are appropriate reasons for public policy. Don't go spreading your belief system to other people.

If you don't do any of the above, awesome! But you are in the vast, vast minority of the religious. Most of them think their religious beliefs informing their political and social interactions is not only allowed but also necessary. And yet if we criticize the basis for these beliefs, we're bigots.

[–]necktie256 0 points1 point ago

You have to be pretty confident that you know all the secrets of the Universe when you start comparing religious belief to using leeches to suck out disease.

[–]the_hoser -4 points-3 points ago

If the religious foundations were so easily corrupted, then were they very strong to begin with?

This isn't up for debate, though. Your arguments fail to produce any convincing reason why we cannot ridicule people for their beleifs. Christianity and Islam have a sordid history, and I will gladly call out christians and muslims alike when they try to describe their faith contrary to that history.

There may be other bad faiths, too. In fact, I'm sure of it. I'm just not as familiar with those.

[–]fuckbeingorginal 3 points4 points ago

Because there seems to be some link between evil men seeking power and sway over people. Abusing and corrupting religious organizations is one avenue to do so apparently, go figure.

If it's not up for debate, then it is merely not up for debate with you. Many people in fact do so, with inclusive results.

Many people admit that there is evil in religion, nothing has caused more deaths than the deaths committed in the name of religion. nothing.

However, there is a proper way to "ridicule" someone. It's not calling their religion bullshit. Someone who is a devout catholic may not ascribe to everything catholic. I saw an interview on 60 minutes once with a Bishop denying the plausibility of hell and ascribing it as manipulation to control people -hell being created as a way to divert suicides during the dark ages as well as controlling the masses. It's not something someone ascribing to a faith in Jesus should believe in.

They were so strong to begin with because at the very heart of them lies something beautiful. Apparently this alludes you.

There may be other bad faiths, you have faith in yourself as an atheist. Have you not ever committed some bad deed with faith invested in yourself?

The fact of the matter is, you do not seem like a very respectful nice person.

[–]alwaysmispells1word 1 point2 points ago

This isn't up for debate, though.

There is no single statement that identifies a narrow minded asshole quiker than this one. You... you personally... are the embodiment of why people hate this subreddit. Please shut up.

[–]Zevenko -1 points0 points ago

Yes, you don't, but a lot of religiious people do. Number 4 is about us having to pay taxes for people to worship their supernatural being, not about donating money to the church. Yes you haven't started a war but the same could be said for nazi's. A nazi zoilder never actaully declared or started a war, but his group and beliefs did. All of your statment directly contadict lots of teachings in the bible and other religious scriptures. Such as kill all who don't believe in your god, 7. I could go on. You can build things and pray in them, but i'm not going to pay for them. If someone makes a claim, they're responsible to provide proof for their claim, let alone a supernatural claim. Religion has made a supernaural claim, and it doesn't have any evidence, therefore i'm going to assume it's wrong or "bullshit" becuase nothing has told me otherwise.

[–]ObsBlk 1 point2 points ago

I think his/her point is that being tolerant is like not picking fist fights. Even if you're a great brawler, you shouldn't go around looking for opportunities to pound on people. However, if someone attacks you, by all means defend yourself. If you want to be tolerant, you don't try to provoke people. Many people would argue that what we need to spread more of is tolerance.

Sometimes it can seem that r/atheism promotes being antagonistic instead of being tolerant.

As someone who thinks atheists should try to be tolerant, the mindset of the OP runs counter to what I believe, as well. If we want to be treated with tolerance, it's only fair that we extend that same courtesy. I don't think it's a chance that there is a near universality to the Golden Rule.

[–]the_hoser -1 points0 points ago

History has shown us that if you let them run free, they'll walk all over you. You do not want to be the quiet minority among a strong religious majority.

[–]fuckbeingorginal 1 point2 points ago

History has shown us that BAD people running freely walk all over people. Just because people are religious does not make them inclined to do bad things, it does not make them a bad person.

History has shown us many religious people doing beautiful amazing things. Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi being forefront in peoples mind. Not hard to dig and find many, many, many others.

The fact of the matter is you do not want to be the quiet minority among a strong majority, period. Doesn't take much time in an american gov class or democratic philosophy class to figure that out.

[–]the_hoser 0 points1 point ago

Actually, you are right only by virtue of something that actually renders my own argument moot. Why were great acts of good and evil committed by highly religiouss people? Well, that's pretty simple. The vast majority of people of the time were religious. Things needed doing, and the odds were vastly in favor of someone religious doing them. This doesn't mean religion was necessarily the reason.

That said, I argue that more acts of good come from secularism these days, then from religion... but it's 1:30... and I have to work tomorrow. Another time :)

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

History has shown us many religious people doing beautiful amazing things. Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi being forefront in peoples mind. Not hard to dig and find many, many, many others.

So a serial philanderer and a racist sexual pervert are your examples of upstanding men?

[–]ObsBlk 0 points1 point ago

Because a person must be perfect or else it invalidates anything good they did?

[–]ObsBlk 0 points1 point ago

Being tolerant isn't the same as letting someone run free. Again, it's comparable to employing self-defense, but not seeking a fight. If someone offends you (especially directly), then, by all means, you can fight back. Still, you shouldn't go around looking for religious people to yell at, unless you want to be a gigantic douche.

[–]shadowplyr 0 points1 point ago

i understand your point, however i feel you are more talking about religious extremists and not religion in itself. i havnt seen or heard of a modern day american christian starting a war over religion...well....ever. i just was saying that if you really want to take the aggression out of something and stop creating tension, then saying something is bullshit you dont believe in doesnt help the situation.

[–]the_hoser 0 points1 point ago

Are you kidding? An American Christian has never started a war over religion? Sure, not weapons were drawn, but look at all of the victories they won over here!

I'll remove the aggression from my rhetoric when they stop forcing public schools to teach my kids about the great wizard in the sky.

[–]the_hoser 4 points5 points ago

You're right on the bullying athiests part. Don't bring biological circumstances into it, though.

You are free to criticize anyone for anything they wish to beleive or not beleive.

[–]Thelastunicorn1 1 point2 points ago

Well I liked your point, even of everyone else seems to think it's a joke.

[–]SurgeHard 0 points1 point ago

i think his poster is saying that one can hate/dislike a belief and not hate or dislike the believers.

[–]Thelastunicorn1 0 points1 point ago

Hate the sin, not the sinner. Good joke

[–]7h3kk1d 0 points1 point ago

It is true for atheists but most educated people don't consider being gay a choice. And if someone has an intelligent reason to support theism they can bully me with it.

[–]mrselkies -1 points0 points ago

It does not imply that verbal bullying of gays is okay. It would if being gay were a choice.

[–]Thelastunicorn1 0 points1 point ago

Why?

[–]goodadvice00 0 points1 point ago

His post says he doesn't have to respect their belief, just that they have the right to believe what they want...not he should go out of his way to be an asshole...ex, a christian who thinks gays should die and go to hell expresses this opinion, OP doesnt have to respect it

[–]Thelastunicorn1 -2 points-1 points ago

Actually, it kind of implies he is going to go around being an ass and calling other peoples beliefs stupid.

[–]the_hoser -2 points-1 points ago

If we didn't go around criticizing each other's ideas, we'd have a lot of really stupid stuff going on. Oh, wait...

[–]Thelastunicorn1 1 point2 points ago

you can criticize without being an ass

[–]the_hoser 0 points1 point ago

Criticizm of something as subjective as beleive is inherently confrontational. It's very unlikely that you can criticize someone for their religious beliefs without upsetting them. The best you can do is convince them to not talk to you about it, but that just hides the problem.

The problem is that religion is into politics these days, and these fairy tales are being used to shape the laws that affect everyone, religious or otherwise.

[–]Thelastunicorn1 0 points1 point ago

Come on, you know there is a difference from being obviously an ass, and offending someone simply because it is a delicate subject that often offends.

[–]Cyralea 0 points1 point ago

A lot of religious people can't make that distinction. Seriously.

[–]alwaysmispells1word 0 points1 point ago

This problem is not uniqe to religious people.

[–]Thelastunicorn1 0 points1 point ago

But we can, and it's our responsibility to use that knowledge wisely. I'm afraid that "They can't tell if I'm actually rude or just being informative, so I'll be an ass about it!" is not really an argument.

[–]funkengruven88 -1 points0 points ago

No it's not. There is no proof of god, but there is plenty of proof of gay people.

Telling someone that religion is bullshit is essentially telling them "because science", because that's all it is.

Telling someone that they are going to hell for being gay and they they are murderers and pedophiles for being gay is a false belief that has no basis in reality. The difference is clear, homophobia has no proof, Science does.

[–]the_hoser 1 point2 points ago

Actually, telling someone that they're going to hell is fine. They believe you're going to hell. That's all well and good.

Just wait for death, okay? Don't bring hell here.

Edit: You can still call them on it, though.

[–]BristolBudgie 0 points1 point ago

"because science" really, that is what you use to argue against the bible bashers?

[–]funkengruven88 0 points1 point ago

The argument is just a vehicle to get their little minds from point A ("god exists") to point B, which is the reality that there is no god at all.

Aside from that, yeah, pretty much, I don't need to waste my time explaining physics and the scientific method to a moron. They can figure it out if they get that curious and open minded, but until then they can hear "are you an idiot?" until they accept that the earth is more than 6k years old.

[–]BristolBudgie 0 points1 point ago

Not all theist belive that, a lot belive exactly what you belive with the only difference being they have a faith and you don't.

How do you argue with those morons? Spout stuff at them them they already belive in, in order to convince them of something they are already convinced of?

[–]funkengruven88 0 points1 point ago

No, but they are not any more correct, so the point remains the same. There is no god, and they need to accept that. I will not change their minds by arguing, because they've had to shut down a huge amount of critical thinking simply to keep the worldview they have.

It's not that they're just in the dark and information is the light, no, they've shut themselves in a deep dark cavern and keep the light out at all costs. What can I say to that? If they ever choose to change their views, I'll be there to talk science and theories etc., but I will not waste time discussing the existence of a deity except as a mythical figure.

[–]Sqeaky -5 points-4 points ago

Bring it on! I am ready for whatever 'verbal bullying' people who believe in a Cosmic Jewish Zombie can put out.

[–]Sqeaky 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, I deserved those downvotes, but it was so fun to post.

[–]silurian87 -1 points0 points ago

verbal bullying

...is harassment, which is never ok. Telling somebody their religion is bullshit isn't harassment, unless you're doing it with the intention of mentally upsetting the person. But try to use common sense, people. A funeral isn't a good place to tell people that there is no scientific evidence for the Christian God...or that their beliefs are laughably provincial, narrow-minded...etc. etc.

[–]jdr4760 38 points39 points ago

Telling someone their belief is bullshit isn't the best tactic IMO. Sweet picture though.

[–]Zevenko 1 point2 points ago

This subbreddit isn't to persuade people or convert them, it's a place for atheists to talk about why we are atheists and what are views on the other beliefs are.

[–]jdr4760 1 point2 points ago

Agreed but

I try not to use profanity and a vocabulary that a brute acquires and strive for a more rational conversation/dialogue when it comes to this matter.

That's all I'm saying.

[–]Zevenko 1 point2 points ago

I agree that using words like "bullshit" isn't effective in a debate, but when we are just trying to laugh at religious people it's very funny and humerous.

[–]jdr4760 1 point2 points ago

Fair enough, I agree with that 100 percent. I just wouldn't say to a person 'Hey your religion, beliefs, trust in god, its all bullshit you know.'

[–]Anticipator1234 -5 points-4 points ago

It is accurate tho.

[–]jdr4760 7 points8 points ago

If you say so. I try not to use profanity and a vocabulary that a brute acquires and strive for a more rational conversation/dialogue when it comes to this matter. In my three years I have learned a lot off r/atheism but after awhile its the same quotes with new pictures. If this sub wanted to spread honest inquiry instead of (mostly) trashing religion or a god then it should organize right here from r/atheism. You have literally thousands of people chomping at the bit, why not use this format in a more constructive way? Organize fundraisers, put up billboards, create safe homes for kids kicked out by their parents (which we read about much too often up here), put on debates, etc, etc.

[–]Bafungoogoo 5 points6 points ago

Do something besides sitting in the dark pissing and moaning?

Good idea...

[–]jdr4760 1 point2 points ago

Can't tell if serious or not, but I am serious. I have watched my own state recently literally outlaw science and allow for civil rights violations to be added into our state constitution. My only source of like minded thinkers, other than a few buddies, is r/atheism, why not jump start some group from here?

Edit: Got the link, agree with them but I think we on Reddit could do much better/more than that.

[–]wm3166 4 points5 points ago

Wait, literally outlaw science? How does that... what.... how does that even work? What state is this. God, I love not being american

[–]jdr4760 2 points3 points ago

[–]wm3166 4 points5 points ago

Lol wow, I guess oil companies and car makers have a lot of stock in north carolina, or who else would be against measuring sea level change?

[–]Sqeaky 0 points1 point ago

People who cannot accept humans can destroy god's perfect creation.

[–]wm3166 1 point2 points ago

I have never yet heard of a Christian saying that sea level rise is not happening. In fact, I've heard it said that it's God's will that it's happening because of the sin in today's society.

[–]jdr4760 0 points1 point ago

Well to be honest I don't know. I personally don't believe we have many oil or car makers here in NC. Our tourism on the Coast is vital for much of the surrounding areas and I'm assuming it deals with that. The Republican leadership has been doing its best to destroy our state environmentally.

[–]Discord_agent 1 point2 points ago

Why not jump start some group in your community for like-minded people?

[–]jdr4760 0 points1 point ago

Honestly, I believe I would be a victim of crime if I was to openly try and organize an atheist group where I am from.

[–]Anticipator1234 -3 points-2 points ago

Sensitively to language doesn't validate your argument. Make your case, swear, or don't. If I drop and F-bomb, you still need to counter my argument, not my profanity. If you can't, you're just a fucking douche.

[–]jdr4760 2 points3 points ago

Team atheist, I don't need to 'counter your argument.' Not every statement needs to be argued. Like my original post says, IMO, just saying a persons belief is bullshit is a bad tactic. I'd like to think we can do better. Have a good life you calm, polite, and thoughtful human being, if anything I've become more aware of our related subreddits, so thanks.

[–]DesertTortoiseSex 9 points10 points ago

I think some of us tend to forget that just because it's okay to disrespect someone's beliefs doesn't mean it is okay to disrespect that person.

[–]Sqeaky 2 points3 points ago

Unfortunately you have confused respect with the right to say it. The First Amendment says nothing about being respected for what you say, just that you are allowed too.

I would rather have the respect there, but with people who literally believe in Magical Boats that contained all the genetic diversity on earth, respectable discourse may not be possible.

[–]DesertTortoiseSex 0 points1 point ago

You should probably explain to me why my comment elicited this response. I don't see the connection.

[–]CaptnAwesomeGuy -1 points0 points ago

Really? You don't see any possible connection his statement has? None at all?

[–]DesertTortoiseSex 0 points1 point ago

First Amendment out of nowhere? Talking about the right to say things? Where the did "you have confused respect with the right to say it" come from? I never even mentioned the right to say anything.

If it's so apparent, why wouldn't you just elucidate instead of making snarky remarks?

[–]xekno 5 points6 points ago

Individuals can forfeit their ability to be respected by saying stupid things. While they have the right to say stupid things (The First Amendment), they do not have a right guaranteeing them respect.

First Amendment out of nowhere?

You are commenting on a thread that deals with peoples right to free speech and their own religion.

it's okay to disrespect someone's beliefs

You also brought up it being "okay" to disrespect someone's beliefs. I think that your own wording has confused you here. It is not necessarily "okay", but people have the right to; and that right comes from the first amendment.

[–]Sqeaky -1 points0 points ago

Whether or not it is proper we have the right to disrespect people (at least in the U.S.). Disrespect can and does happen, and sometimes disrespecting is more effective than respecting them. I would rather be respectful, but through careful use of disrespect I have changed a few minds, were purely respectful tactics had failed.

[–]BristolBudgie 1 point2 points ago

I belive this is the same philosophy/approach used by the WBC....just putting that out there.

[–]necktie256 0 points1 point ago

You're wrong and you're stupid. Now chnge your mind to agree with me.

[–]the_hoser -1 points0 points ago

Why not? The religious people do it to us all the time.

You're right, but if it were just a matter of that person's own beliefs, and if they had no influence on others who don't believe as they do, then we wouldn't be having this discussion.

[–]Thelastunicorn1 -1 points0 points ago

Yeah! Let's get on their level!

[–]big_bad_brownie 3 points4 points ago

If your friend just got out of alcoholics anonymous and changed their life for the better, through a largely christian organization, you would have the "right" to tell them that Christianity is bullshit, but you would be an awful person for doing so.

That's why people tip toe around religion. Not because we might piss off some fundies, but because we don't want to insult and attack all the normal people in the world who need to believe in God to change their lives for the better or find comfort following their losses.

You guys aren't offering an alternative system. Science is not a support group or a life philosophy and r/ atheism is a message board where people post inflammatory memes. Neither are going to be of very much help to an addict or an orphan or a terminal cancer patient.

[–]thiswhovian 6 points7 points ago

I agree with you quote, but I don't feel it is right to tell others that what they believe is bullshit. Sure it is within our rights, but just because we can do it does not mean we have to do it.

[–]the_hoser 0 points1 point ago

If it were just a matter of personal belief, then there wouldn't be an issue. However, these people vote for the strangest things, and throw mud on our lives for it.

[–]thiswhovian 1 point2 points ago

"these people," as in the religious, and/or fellow redditors? I don't know as to whom you are referring to.

[–]the_hoser -1 points0 points ago

Yes :)

I was actually referring to religious people. If they want to restrict their own lives to live by the code of their faith, then more power to them. If they just kept it to themselves, the world would be a better place.

[–]thiswhovian 0 points1 point ago

Ahh, I see. Yeah, I mean, I can be for people keeping their beliefs to themselves, but then where would the questioning come from? The doubts? Would we still make progress if we all just kept it to ourselves? I don't like people pushing their views on me, regardless of the issue, but I can listen without being a jerk. I don't think the world would necessarily be a better place though.

[–]Lies_about_biscuits 2 points3 points ago

This made me believe that this was an interview with a galaxy and that was talking about religion...

[–]boatplane 2 points3 points ago

Shhhhhh! Someone may get offended.

[–]aDarkerKnight 2 points3 points ago

Thanks for sharing this .. This is exactly what I do when I'm accused of 'intolerance'

[–]heidihannah 2 points3 points ago

You do not have to respect people's religion. It is the polite and friendly way of life. You do not have to be a decent human being.

I do not have to refrain from telling you that you are an ass

I do like the picture though. Also, why does it seem that atheist means a rejection of believers as well as the belief itself?

[–]BristolBudgie 2 points3 points ago

Isn't this poster one big contradiction....to a lot of things? :s

[–]Thelastunicorn1 3 points4 points ago

I hate to be the one that says it, but really? Are we trying to show people the truth, or are we just having fun being dicks and feeling superior? Honestly? Please? For the love of all that is good and decent, what is it? I'm not religious, and I'm not atheist, but I've dealt with radicals on both sides and they are pretty much the same.

[–]LuckyCharms307 1 point2 points ago

We do this because the ideals of Christianity are dominating America and keeping us behind in time. (stem cell research, REDICULOUS drug laws, etc)

[–]Thelastunicorn1 1 point2 points ago

And being an ass hole will solve all that? I'll get started right away.

[–]Cyralea 0 points1 point ago

Being open and confrontational, as per New Atheism these past 10 years, has lead to the largest insurgence of atheists in history. While counterintuitive, it does work. Being quiet and malleable just means the other side can walk over you.

[–]Thelastunicorn1 0 points1 point ago

I'm not saying to be quiet, I'm saying to not be an ass. I'd rather have a friendly Christian than an ass hole atheist. And when I say friendly Christian I mean that they don't try to use their religion to change the laws, and they actually act like Christ and don't hate.

[–]Sqeaky 0 points1 point ago

Truth definitely truth.

Some people are immune to logic. Some of these people are hurting other people based on stone age ideologies. Something other than politeness must be used. I would agree that OPs 'bullshit' tactic lacks subtlety and will likely be ineffective unless trolling is his real goal.

[–]Thelastunicorn1 -1 points0 points ago

It kills me, it really kills me. I don't know why some people are so blind, everyone is trying to convince everyone that they're right, and everyone usually looks like ass holes. Intentions get lost in garble, everyone looks like a bad guy, everyone feels like a victim. I'm not saying people shouldn't try their best, but goodness, it's just so ineffective to be an ass hole. There is no one way to deal with everyone.

[–]LuckyCharms307 1 point2 points ago

Andromeda <3

[–]fuckbeingorginal 1 point2 points ago

I posted this before, but it's even more relevant here.

I have noticed an underlying problem with the atheist movement in reddit stemming from orgins I'm not quite in touch with, but the problem is nevertheless evident. Many Atheists do not seem to understand what it means to be a theist, agnostic, anything but Atheist. Borderline presumtious, obvious, and slightly ironic statement.

I can't relate to someone being kicked out of their house for being Atheist...the bible belt, the GOP's sociatal policies, and just hatred in general mystifies and frightens me. Their ideas for conducting one's life and the vision that goes with it seem just flat out wrong in my eyes.

I cant imagine being surrounded with and having to intimately interact with people of such nature. But it's these very people as to why I think that Atheists coming to reddit as a safehaven would naturaly lean towards disrespecting any espoused theist knowledge/mindset.

I grew up outside philadelphia, went to a very libral and highly-regarded private episcopalian school that had its share of athiests, christians, jews, muslims, and lbgt;and, with class sizes of no more than 110 you interacted with someone along those lines everyday. And I met some really fucking smart people. And some really fucking awesome, brilliant teachers/professors. And a lot of them called themselves religious.

I think it's important that the Athiest community respect religious philosophy. And that mean's knowing more than which retarded verses in the bible to quote to some narrow-minded fundamental christian.

I recomend looking into Origen/Clement who wrote durring the first through third centuries, the birth of christianity, and who are credited with combating the christian Gnostic movement by connecting and syncing Neo-Platonic thought and Christianity; and other inconsistencies throughout the bible -including many other beautiful philosophies of love, reasoning, and practice.

Ghandi's autobiography is a must read.

Being Agnostic is NOT the same thing as being Athiest. Far from it. Maybe a religious philosophy p.h.d could do an AmA about it.

I have recently done some digging into the Tao, excited to go deeper into that stuff.

And I'll end the rant with my theist outake. I believe Love, Energy, and God are all the same thing. I believe a thought is the most powerful thing, force, known to mankind. It can create a nuclear bomb, start a war, or feed billions and send us into space. I believe Good and Evil are very real foces in the world, there are good actions and bad actions -a good action, giving someone shelter, or a bad action, rape, forever alters a life and makes the abstracts Good and Bad very real forces.

Ghandi believes in searching for truth. I believe in searching for the truth of Eros, Philos, and Agape.

Search for the truth. Read, read, and read some more. And when you're not doing that, just be a good person; it's nice to be nice.

[–]jbenedict17 1 point2 points ago

Why such strong language? Just say "Im not religious" Its not that hard to be nice

[–]deadsy18 1 point2 points ago

I'm sure this is what the Phelps would say to you, you sound as idiotic as they do.

[–]Normal-redditor 1 point2 points ago

lol there is no god PICTURE OF SPACE lol

[–]hatebiscuit 5 points6 points ago

I reserve the right to tell my friends that their apartment is horribly decorated, the right to tell my aunt that she is a terrible cook, and the right to tell my dad that he's overweight. Let's just use our rights for the sake of using our rights, this world could use more jerks.

[–]the_hoser 0 points1 point ago

The problem is that you're not forced to decorate your apartment like your friends do, not forced to cook like your aunt, and not required to eat like your dad. If any of these things were true, then you would have a point.

[–]hatebiscuit 0 points1 point ago

I'm guessing the people that are aware and free enough to tell others how bullshit their religion is, are also probably free and aware enough to simply not subscribe to whichever religion is bothering them in the first place.

[–]BristolBudgie 0 points1 point ago

Your problem is you are tarring all theists with the same brush, maybe try opening your mind a little.

I have never encountered a religious person in my life that has forced or tried to force me to do anything. I accept that some religious people do. Therefore I don't class them all the same.

[–]the_hoser 0 points1 point ago

The ones that don't do anything to force me to be like them are at fault because they don't do anything to stop those who would force me to be like them. This is not always the case. The muslims parked outside the christian church in Egypt to deter suicide bombers during their Christmas services was heartwarming. This sentiment is rare among theists, sadly.

[–]BristolBudgie 0 points1 point ago

I can't agree with that premise at all. Theist are no more responsible for the behavior and views of other theists than you are responsible for the behavior of all atheists. And you're calling people of faith deluded?

It actually sounds to the layman that you are advocating the behavioral patterns of evangelical theists.

Also, that sentiment you shared is not rare amongst theists, you just haven't opened you eyes very wide. People of faith do selfless acts for people of other faiths and people of no faith every day. It seems you have completely closed your mind to tar nearly every person of faith as bad and evil. The truth of the matter is everyone is different theist, atheist or agnostic.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]wm3166 1 point2 points ago

That's the problem with atheism quotes, if you replace the word religion with atheism you get a quote that has the exact same evidence behind it but represents the polar opposite viewpoint.

[–]Cyralea 2 points3 points ago

Except that atheism fully holds up to criticism and rational argument. It's not like it's a generic ad hominem.

I believe that's a Hitchens quote, and he was all for dissecting your ideas, religious or otherwise, to ensure you always had ideas rooted in reality.

[–]Puck-Wild 2 points3 points ago

I'm a theist, and I agree. This is true tolerance--the old tolerance. The "new" tolerance that says "you must ascribe the same truth value to all viewpoints, and you better not criticize them" is a good recipe for the closing of the mind. Thanks for the post.

[–]Sqeaky 5 points6 points ago

By the Flying Spaghetti Monster, A theist and I agree on something! have an upvote.

[–]captainmajesty 0 points1 point ago

By Carl Sagan's ghost! How odd you two very different creatures aren't ripping each other apart!

[–]SummonerofDoubt 4 points5 points ago

well done. all hail lord Cthulhu

[–]peoplemakereligions 3 points4 points ago

I feel like religious people push too many people to be religious, and atheists push too many people to be an atheist. live and let live. but i do like the picture. I think people believe to strongly with religions. at the very least it great for morals. your idea of people that are religious is not entirely true

[–]CaptnAwesomeGuy -1 points0 points ago

Hahaha great for morals!

[–]sli8 0 points1 point ago

This sounds almost exactly like a Patton Oswalt joke/quote.

[–]Mrdudemanguy 0 points1 point ago

[–]amon41amarth 0 points1 point ago

We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.

-H.L. Mencken

[–]picado 0 points1 point ago

"We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart." -- H. L. Mencken

[–]gbot26 0 points1 point ago

In response to this photo - Carl Sagan put into words how I feel far better than I could have!

"The chief deficiency I see in the skeptical movement is its polarization: Us vs. Them — the sense that we have a monopoly on the truth; that those other people who believe in all these stupid doctrines are morons; that if you're sensible, you'll listen to us; and if not, to hell with you. This is nonconstructive. It does not get our message across. It condemns us to permanent minority status.”

Basically - yes - you have every right to do this, however if your goal is for secular country/world, then it's probably not the best method to get there.

[–]ParagonIHX 0 points1 point ago

Oops, never mind, thought this was a .gif I saw.

[–]dbbo 0 points1 point ago

At first I thought this was full of comma splices, but then I realized it's just set in a terrible typeface.

[–]Cyralea 0 points1 point ago

Absolutely. In academia, poor ideas are torn apart with no regards to the feelings of the presenter. What this leads to is good science. We should be openly critical of all bad ideas, to shame them into obscurity.

If I can paraphrase Sam Harris, consider how many people still openly proclaim that Elvis is still alive. Anyone who does so immediately pays a price.

[–]ninjamuffin 0 points1 point ago

Its not illegal to be a douche, it's just frowned upon. Like masturbating on an airplane

[–]MrMadcap 0 points1 point ago

The practice of religious tolerance / respect only exists to avoid mutually assured destruction.

[–]Cilph 0 points1 point ago

Can we please stop taking unrelated pictures and slapping on a quote using a bad and hardly legible font?

[–]Discord_agent 0 points1 point ago

Then call it a skeptics' society, or ____ Skeptics in the pub.

[–]Ninjasantaclause 0 points1 point ago

I feel so sorry for athiests that are picked on in their day to day lives

[–]Guitarsession100 0 points1 point ago

Good job for not giving credit to Patton Oswalt who said this.

[–]4Gotten1[S] 0 points1 point ago

Who's Patton Oswalt?

[–]Guitarsession100 0 points1 point ago

Really? Google him, he's hilarious

[–]4Gotten1[S] 0 points1 point ago

Oh, it's Spencer from King of Queens.

[–]Guitarsession100 0 points1 point ago

yes, he is but he is also an amazing stand up comedian.

[–]wez_511 0 points1 point ago

believe what you like, but being a dick is always uncalled for.

[–]Pancho15 0 points1 point ago

This is were have an issue. You should also respect their beliefs if you want them to respect your own. Have a meaningful and productive debate but don't banter them with how you think their beliefs are stupid. Especially because there are people that need to believe in God, in miracles, and in heaven to get through the day (everyone is different) It all breaks down to the Golden Rule. Would you want someone coming to you and telling you your beliefs were stupid? Being an atheist does not make you a better person. Being respectful and understanding does.

[–]toadguyx -2 points-1 points ago

I like the Andromeda galaxy. I also kind of like your quote. upvote for you.

[–]4Gotten1[S] -2 points-1 points ago

I thought it would be a nice backdrop.

[–]LuckyCharms307 1 point2 points ago

For your next use m101 ... Lol

[–]Anticipator1234 -2 points-1 points ago

I respect that your are allowed to believe in bullshit, respect my my right to tell you it is. It's call the First Amendment Americans, live it, or STFU.

[–]cagg333 6 points7 points ago

Then you must also respect the right of others to speak about their religion. You also must respect the rights of the people who believe in Creationism to speak about it. You also must respect the rights of those who belittle you for being atheist. It's a two way street.

[–]Anticipator1234 -5 points-4 points ago

That's fine, but I can back my shit up, theists can't.

[–]Puck-Wild 1 point2 points ago

I'm a theist. What can't I back up?

[–]Anticipator1234 1 point2 points ago

Theism. Take your best shot.

[–]Sqeaky 0 points1 point ago

Don't let your in-eloquence get the best of you. Young Earth Creationism is indefensible but at least some theism is defensible.

[–]Anticipator1234 -1 points0 points ago

Really? Prove it. And by the way, if your don't like the way I express myself, that's your problem, not mine. You understood what I was saying.

[–]necktie256 2 points3 points ago

Aren't you upset with "theists" because they claim to have all the answers with no proof? Where's your proof? How do you know all the answers?

How about a little respect for fellow humans?

[–]Anticipator1234 -5 points-4 points ago

Where's your proof?

If you know anything about physics, you wouldn't be asking this question. There are a number of hypotheses that fit within quantum mechanics that explain the big bang. Not one of them requires a god. They aren't proven yet, but there was a time E=MC 2 wasn't known. It only takes time to prove what we know, but it takes little time to disprove religion.

How about a little respect for fellow humans?

I will not respect ignorance and stupidity. Bring me a coherent, fact based argument and I will willingly listen. Until then, you are an ignorant bunch of fools who don't just deserve disrespect, but ridicule.

[–]necktie256 2 points3 points ago

Why do you deserve respect?

[–]Anticipator1234 0 points1 point ago

Even better, the burden is yours. Prove God.

[–]HotNewMusicToday -1 points0 points ago

It's right there in the Bible. What other prove could you possibly need?!

[–]Anticipator1234 1 point2 points ago

Poe, or fucking retarded, I cant tell.

[–]cagg333 -1 points0 points ago

Understandable.

[–]Cyralea -1 points0 points ago

I agree, but probably not for the reason you were looking for. When you have direct confrontation of ideas, the poor ones typically take a backseat when they become a source of scorn and ridicule. Religion only really persists because it's socially acceptable. Make it an absolutely embarrassing thing to believe, and you'll see believers dropping by the minute.

So let them insult atheism, they should be allowed to speak their minds. So long as we can be open and confrontational with our ideas, theirs will become the equivalent to believing Elvis is alive. We'll come out ahead.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Anticipator1234 0 points1 point ago

You misquoted me. I said live it, or shut the fuck up. That means, accept that you can be ridiculed for your beliefs, and ridicule the beliefs of others, or shut the fuck up.

You aren't very good at this.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]bradlums 0 points1 point ago

I agree that you shouldn't disrespect people's beliefs, but no supporting evidence to discredit religion? you can't be serious

[–]Sqeaky -1 points0 points ago

I agree wholeheartedly. Reserve the right to say 'Bullshit' but use it judiciously, doing this directs many of their negative emotions at you.

I think laughing right in their face, the first time they to explain the virgin mary, jesus's resurrection, or faith in general is better though. It generates more negative emotions like humiliation/doubt and less negative emotions are directly aimed at you. Of course you should politely apologize and try to play it off as their joking or something.

If they really believe in bullshit you are not going to convince them with words, logic and easily dismissible arguments (all arguments are easily dismissible). These people act on emotion before logic, so speak with emotion.

[–]jturgeon228 -1 points0 points ago

So... Do atheists just come on reddit to circle jerk each other, or does it just turn out that way?

[–]Atheris -1 points0 points ago

Yes.

[–]fallens -1 points0 points ago

Wow, that picture of M31 really added to the words!!!