We're arguing whether or not a robot from the future can shoot a shotgun with one hand while riding a motorcycle. I'd argue that all our arguments are full of holes. Nonetheless, I have argued about the hand/arm weight, the recoil force and the processing speed. Plus implied several other factors. But the arguments against mine amount to little more than, 'yeah but it's a fucking robot. And robots are bad ass... Oh yeah, and you're a cunt.'

The randomness of the recoil and variability of conditions of one handed motorcycle driving would make the likelihood of a perfectly steady shot, with zero noticeable recoil, nil. The upwards torque from the muzzle of the gun would be amplified due to the leverage gained from the length of the shotgun itself. This would potentially double if not triple the amount of force needed to keep the gun completely steady. I'm in no way suggesting that the T800 isn't strong or a complete badass. Nor am I suggesting that it wouldn't be able to completely control the firing of the shotgun with complete accuracy and little noticeable recoil effect. I'm arguing that the calculation and variability involved in a shotgun blast with NO noticeable recoil isn't likely. You'd need strength to control it, weight to provide stabilization and calculation speed and exactness (not preciseness) to preload and counteract the force. Could very well have the strength, although I remain skeptical. Weight, he'd need to weigh a minimum of 500 pounds to even have a chance at not being jerked back a little bit. Given that his arm was easily carried by a young kid and a woman, that weight minimum doesn't seem likely. The processing power, well, I think there are just too many variables to control for.