this post was submitted on
621 points (52% like it)
6,618 up votes 5,997 down votes

WTF

subscribe2,159,817 readers

7,364 users here now

New Rules:

  • No screenshots (e.g. Facebook, Youtube)
  • No memes, captioned images.
  • No rage comics
  • No politics / posts with political implications - Includes Activism, Call for public outcry etc.
  • No re-hosted web comics
  • No begging for upvotes
  • No links to reddit
  • Personal information is not allowed and will be removed, repeat offenders banned
  • Links to facebook are not allowed
  • NSFW posts must be tagged or will be removed.
  • Gore and Porn are not by default WTF, consider posting the more extreme stuff to /r/spacedicks

All (& only) things that make you say WTF. The moderators of /r/WTF reserve the right to moderate posts for not being WTF and would be more appropriate in more relevant subreddits.


Thanks to licenseplate for the excellent logo & thanks to humansmartbomb for the previous logo


Please DO NOT post personal information

Such posts or comments will be removed and offenders may be banned. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


Shout Outs:

/r/weird

/r/creepy

/r/creepy_gif

/r/offbeat

/r/WTFart

/r/NSFW_WTF

/r/sfw_wtf

/r/BugWars

/r/awesome

/r/toosoon

/r/mildlyinteresting

/r/FanTheories

New: /r/tifu

New: /r/MorbidReality


Exceptions to the rules can be granted by the moderators; The moderators of /r/WTF reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 464

[–]SimilarImage 265 points266 points ago

Age User Title Reddit Cmnt Points
2 months HeavenSk8 How is this acceptable again? here 729 1162
11 months soweallgrow Fuck everything about this. /r/politics 1510 2527
8 months Everseer Justice is served... /r/pics 372 791

This is an automated response

FAQ | Send Feedback | Report Error

[–]c-c-captain 183 points184 points ago

Wait a second.

This guy posted the same link twice in two months with the same caption?

[–]Jymotion 97 points98 points ago

usually it's because it flopped the first time, but it got over 1100 points the first time. Dude either has alzheimers or zero creativity

[–]Homeschooled316 55 points56 points ago

It takes bravery to repost your own successful submission.

[–]Jymotion 40 points41 points ago

which was a repost to begin with. almost too much bravery

[–]Homeschooled316 26 points27 points ago

Bravery level: Ron Paul

[–]utopianfiat 5 points6 points ago

[–]Caulibflower 2 points3 points ago

Bravery Level: Al Gore.

[–]SantiagoRamon 30 points31 points ago

Dude needs his karma fix.

[–]PLACENTA_IS_YUMMY 27 points28 points ago

Karma whoring: HeavenSk8 gets it.

edit

[–]cojafoji 9 points10 points ago

I actually tagged him as: "an actual honest to god karma whore."

[–]MinecraftMan1 0 points1 point ago

According to a PM he replied to me, he said it was science and that he was satisfied with the results.

So, if he's so satisfied, he should delete it.

[–]Jymotion 0 points1 point ago

it's funny/frustrating that people think they can perform "scientific experiments" on reddit using upvotes as measurement. They don't realize the large amount of factors that go into those numbers and just end up feeling like they confirmed their hypothesis

[–]scottyhood 40 points41 points ago

How is this acceptable again?

[–]ImAFuckingMeteor 1 point2 points ago

Clearly he forgot how this was acceptable and needed to be reminded....again. It seems like a very honest title.

[–]jaskmackey 0 points1 point ago

He said "again."

[–]ekaceerf 0 points1 point ago

time to go down vote both of them

[–]blaezign_w_hitler -1 points0 points ago

so people care more that a major problem with the USA is re-posted, but no one cares if its some shitty rage comic or a cat. reddit: big fat faggots edit: reddit = big fat faggot popularity contest with other big fat faggots

[–]MasonNowa -2 points-1 points ago

Fuck that guys reposting, but I don't mind more people seeing this.

[–]QuitReadingMyName -1 points0 points ago

Yeah this post raises awareness.

[–]iliveinabunkbed 396 points397 points ago

This guy obviously asked for prison in order to get some food.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]YamiNoSenshi 119 points120 points ago

About a year ago, a guy robbed a bank for $1 so he could get jail time and medical care, which is pretty fucked up.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/man-robs-bank-medical-care-jail-143625999.html

[–]iliveinabunkbed 89 points90 points ago

I'd do the same. This guy have more dignity doing that than an asshole who steal money in order to buy blings and dope.

[–][deleted] 58 points59 points ago

Or Caramel Lattes

[–]aChileanDude 22 points23 points ago

and meth gas.

Don't forget the gas.

[–]Warsalt 24 points25 points ago

I'd be so pissed if they return the money and still get charged...I mean who doesn't like money...I dunno

[–]MelowMaverick 2 points3 points ago

I've been on Reddit too much today.

[–]thedude34 1 point2 points ago

Dax Sheppard Voice "I like money..."

[–]Prospec7 2 points3 points ago

Cant believe you like money too

[–]skwishems 1 point2 points ago

The gas...it makes the forget...

[–]cmon_now 6 points7 points ago

Or Camel Lights

[–]Phoequinox 2 points3 points ago

Or Camelot.

[–]fuckinDEAD 1 point2 points ago

Or Cargo shorts

[–]awwwwwwsick 13 points14 points ago

This was literally on the front page yesterday.

[–]yur_mom 1 point2 points ago

I bet it was just a coincidence...

[–]redstonenico 0 points1 point ago

That was on TIl today. :)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

That makes sense, except I doubt that had anything to do with the "15" year sentence.

[–]wickedsmaht 0 points1 point ago

I used to work security in a hospital and it was very common for homeless people to come in an claim some mental disturbance to get a warm bed and food for at least a night. During the winter it would be really bad.

[–]infazz 10 points11 points ago

In a book I read, All Over But The Shoutin' by Rick Bragg, the author wrote of a man he had heard about that would feast in fine restaurants, and when it came time to pay the bill he would tell the waiter that he couldn't and to just let the cops come get him. He did this because he had nowhere in his life to go or nothing to do that would be better than a fine meal and the security that prison brings for the homeless.

[–]dirichletseries 1 point2 points ago

Isn't that from The Cop and the Anthem? Or probably something before that even

[–]NotAThrowaway65678 20 points21 points ago

or to be safe from getting his face eaten and all.

[–]iliveinabunkbed 0 points1 point ago

streets are no longer safe with zombies walking around. a new zombie case every day.

[–]theredlie1988 0 points1 point ago

too soon?!

[–]ull90 1 point2 points ago

Most likely. The rich guy should have gotten more time though.

[–]Jubtron 1 point2 points ago

Although this is certainly a plausible theory, it smacks a little too much of a just-world theory for me to feel comfortable believing it by itself. I've gotta look into this.

[–]bultonic 4 points5 points ago

I read up on this when I first saw it, I was pretty upset about it. I can't provide source, but I do remember he was a repeat offender for several crimes similar to this, some with weapons.

[–]Subalpine 2 points3 points ago

And a warm place to sleep on a bed. thats a hard one.

[–]LithiumKitten 1 point2 points ago

Came here to say this.

15 years in prison for someone with no home and no money is actually a lot better than living on the street.

Pretty noble of the guy though.

[–]nhupress 1 point2 points ago

Yeah, at least he can say he returned it. That is noble, or as much as he can be in that situation.

[–]circa 0 points1 point ago

i'm guessing you've never been inside prison.

[–]LithiumKitten 0 points1 point ago

<_< Well, no...Is it actually worse than being homeless and hungry?

[–]loliwearhats 86 points87 points ago

One case is federal, one case is Louisiana. They are separate court systems informed by separate laws written by separate legislatures.

Now if you can dredge up a case of robbery crossing state lines...

[–]PatAunces 66 points67 points ago

The homeless man also had prior convictions for violent crimes, while the CEO cooperated with the police and led to arrests of more people involved in the scheme.

I don't have the sources on hand, but this has been posted and discussed many times before.

[–]LordBenners 3 points4 points ago

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/roybrown.asp

That's some of it. I know what you're talking about again.

[–]A_walmart_greeter 0 points1 point ago

Not sure if this pertains, but at least in Texas the threat of a weapon still makes it an aggravated robbery. Which is much more harsh in sentencing than a normal robbery.

[–]dclowd9901 0 points1 point ago

CEO cooperated with the police and led to arrests of more people

Clearly worth $15 billion.

[–]TheSource88 -3 points-2 points ago

High finance criminals, who rob people legally and illegally as a career should get less time in jail because they sold out their buddies? That's pretty unacceptable to me.

[–]PatAunces 24 points25 points ago

What's better, busting one high finance criminal, or busting several high finance criminals?

[–]TheSource88 0 points1 point ago

You're missing the point. Why is it that we live in a country with unimaginable wealth, yet the people that exploit it are able to get out of trouble by being rats while the people who are victims of the circumstances created by this system have to suffer to be fed and turn to illegal measures in order to eat?

[–]CantBelieveItsButter 10 points11 points ago

people do it for regular crimes too. It's called being an informant. Herp derp.

[–]ImAFuckingMeteor 5 points6 points ago

Bank robbers get less time too if they roll on their accomplices that are still at large and likely to get off scott free.

[–]SOMETHING_POTATO 3 points4 points ago

Keep in mind it says "for his role." You have no idea what that role was.

[–]dj_bizarro 0 points1 point ago

Well its a good thing you're not in charge of either system.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]PLACENTA_IS_YUMMY 25 points26 points ago

The funny part is...the guy that posted it now is the same guy as [1] on your list. He didn't even change the title. Bastard.

[–]Osiris32 310 points311 points ago

Oh god, the level of legal ignorance in this thread is staggering.

The CEO was charged with...OBSTRUCTION!! Yes, that's right, he didn't actually steal anything, he was simply involved in the cover-up, and was criminally neglegent in how he handled his company.

The homeless man was charged with...ROBBERY!! Yes, that's right, a crime of physical violence!! More than a tad different.

The amount of money involved is meaningless. People who holler about how this is a miscarriage of justice simply don't understand the concept of law and how it works. They make snap decisions based off headlines, and make vast assumptions based of the very limited amount of evidence that gets released to the public.

And before I get obliterated, because the hivemind hates being disagreed with, I ask that you actually read into those two stories. All the way through. Then read the actual text of the laws that apply. And if you still think this is a massive miscarriage of justice, hen I challenge you to write a system that works in a manner that treats everyone equally yet still follows your personal ideology, because you can have one or the other, not both.

[–]Jewzilian 94 points95 points ago

If you just presented me with the story of the homeless man getting 15 years, even without the comparison to the CEO, I'd still be shocked.

[–]gdebug 28 points29 points ago

This article circulates Reddit about once a month. The homeless man had a bunch of prior charges. I am too lazy to find the previous sources, but they are in the bowels of Reddit somewhere.

[–]markycapone 1 point2 points ago

I think he was also armed. This thing hits reedit at least twice a month

[–]Sandinister 37 points38 points ago

To be fair, they don't mention any prior convictions the guy had. I would guess he had at least a few.

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points ago

People have dug up info on him in the past. He not only had prior convictions, but he was currently on probation at the time of the robbery.

[–]Khiva 14 points15 points ago

DOESN'T MATTER ALREADY MAD

[–]Osiris32 17 points18 points ago

How about we take the word "homeless" and substitute "repeat violent criminal offender?" Both descriptors are true, would that make you less shocked?

[–]gsabram 1 point2 points ago

Also he's being tried in Louisiana State Court, which is a very different court system than any other State Court of Federal Court in the states. Louisiana, like Quebec, France, and Spain, uses a Civil Law system as opposed to a Common Law system, which can potentially lead to big differences in interpretation of the law.

[–]I_have_a_dog 32 points33 points ago

Exactly. The CEO was just aiding and abetting. The homeless man threatened someone with what they thought was a gun. If you read about it, the actual ringleader for the fraud case was sentenced to 30 years.

[–]voon 6 points7 points ago

Dude you are totally ruining the class war with your non-knee jerk reaction.

[–]phanboy 1 point2 points ago

The amount of money involved is meaningless.

For robbery, this might be the case, but for petty theft, it's the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony.

[–]Arnox 1 point2 points ago

For those that are interested in this type of public opinion regarding criminal sentences, I suggest you take a look at this report:

www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/1128_aic.pdf

Which concludes:

"The results show that a substantial majority of jurors with firsthand experience of judges consider that sentences are appropriate and that judges are in touch with public opinion."

That is to say that the more one knows about a case, the more likely they are to agree with the sentencing. Here is a Media Watch episode of the subject.

[–]Kinglink 1 point2 points ago

In addition there's a number of other factors. The CEO probably didn't have a previous criminal record. The homeless man may have. There's a number other contributing factors as well.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]canopener 2 points3 points ago

Of course the amount of money is important. And the fact that Brown showed remorse enough to turn himself in. The injustice is in he sentencing. It's impossible for 15 years to be just for that robbery.

[–]dj_bizarro 0 points1 point ago

I guess there are probably different classes of robberies, but I also suspect there is a minimum penalty for robbing a bank. I don't think it matters if he just robbed it for a short period of time and then returned it.

[–]A_walmart_greeter 1 point2 points ago

Yes, robbing then returning doesn't excuse the offense. It will, however, help an attorney in trying to get a lighter sentence, or to plea for a chance at parole, but it doesn't excuse the crime. Actually many criminals turn themselves in this way.

[–]darth_holio 0 points1 point ago

Don't fuck with the man's money.

[–]canopener 0 points1 point ago

According to a random Internet source, the minimum was 3 years in this case.

[–]LePoisson -2 points-1 points ago

I'm not saying this as part of the "hive mind." Perhaps the way the law works at times is a) wrong and b) still wrong. The guilty party in the first case did not turn themselves in and definitely contributed to many more people being without far more than $100. In the second case the man turned himself in after feeling bad and was fucked in the ass by being given a ridiculously harsh penalty. Admittedly he pretended to have a gun and someone may have felt threatened. That is still not worth 15 years of that mans LIFE.

It's wrong, I don't care if it's by the book. I don't care if the law says x when our society and our consciences say y.

[–]sscall 2 points3 points ago

What happens when someone has a heart attack when he harmlessly robs them?

[–]OJ_Mayo -1 points0 points ago

The homeless guy had prior violent crimes. His only crime wasn't stealing $100. Take the blinders off..

[–]emniem 1 point2 points ago

See, he's a black guy! That's what Lady Justice sees when she takes the blinders off. Black guy, 15 years. White guy, 40 months for destroying more lives.

[–]akproplayer 25 points26 points ago

Welp, he has a place to stay now.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]omg_my_ex_is_crazy 1 point2 points ago

What did she do to the child?

[–]methoxeta 6 points7 points ago

I may be wrong but I think if he wanted to tell us he would have.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, probably a touchy subject.

[–]Megatr0nFTW 1 point2 points ago

Well its clear this wasn't Casey Anthony.

[–]emniem 1 point2 points ago

Where's Nancy Grace when you need her.

[–]gliscameria 8 points9 points ago

Holy shit, it's 2011 again?!?! That's unacceptable, I already did that year!!!

[–]anonymousHacker 4 points5 points ago

I agree reposts are NOT acceptable.

[–]zoomzoomz 6 points7 points ago

[–]TOOBADBLACKSMITH 2 points3 points ago

This guy posts this exact same picture every now and then for karma

[–]FussyCashew 2 points3 points ago

I just recently saw this, coulda sworn it was on reddit...

[–]morgangangful 2 points3 points ago

The past 10 wtf pictures I have seen have all been reposts...

[–]POINTING_OUT_REPOSTS 2 points3 points ago

THIS IS A REPOST

[–]duchovny 2 points3 points ago

Downvoted for reposting your own submission from 2 months ago with the same title.

[–]the_8th_henry 10 points11 points ago

IIRC, the CEO wasn't the main person behind the fraud. He was criminally negligent because he knew and didn't stop it. Plus, he helped the feds get evidence and build a case on the main people behind the fraud. That's why he got 3 years.

The homeless man was a repeat offender with many convictions to his name and was on parole at the time.

It's apples and oranges.

[–]toga-Blutarsky 4 points5 points ago

Not to mention the totally separate crimes.

[–]Beachj0602 11 points12 points ago

To be honest, if i were homeless 15 years of free food and medical service would be something to be excited for.

GG Judge.

[–]Pelican_Fly 14 points15 points ago

you forgot the free sex.

[–]Bainemo 0 points1 point ago

Nobody could forget the free sex

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points ago

You missed the Reddit front page post about how Lousiana is the prison capital of the world and is run privately and treats its prisoners as cattle. He picked the worst state in the country.

[–]Likestechlongtime 5 points6 points ago

Worst state in the world it seems.

[–]StoneTigerRodeo 8 points9 points ago

Because China, Russia, and North Korean prisons are so fucking luxurious by comparison.

[–]circa 0 points1 point ago

don't get in the way of reddit's pipedream of prisons being a literal big rock candy mountain.

[–]lalabaha 0 points1 point ago

my thoughts exactly

[–]yellowoftops 5 points6 points ago

This is acceptable as a lawsuit because a jury of their peers handed down contextual sentences as referenced by other responses. The part that is unacceptable is posting half researched non-truths and wasting everyone's time while they are forced to do your legwork to fully understand issues.

There are serious issues in our country's legal sphere. Our great access to information means we owe due diligence to the people who read our written words to be considered proper internet citizens.

[–]Yeahweget1t 8 points9 points ago

Because legally there is a difference between robbing and stealing. In most states robbery carries a mandatory -at least- 10 year sentence. Robbing is taking forcefully with a weapon or threatening someone, stealing is not. The more you know

[–]wadad17 1 point2 points ago

IDK, lemme go check what people said the first 12 times this was posted...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

Yeah, i hate when people post things in the wrong subreddit as well.

[–]valjean260 1 point2 points ago

I get that were not supposed to complain about reposts, but it's your OWN DAMN REPOST IN THE SAME SUB REDDIT WITH THE SAME TITLE!!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

you mean how is this repost acceptable? I don't know.

[–]omplatt 1 point2 points ago

It's like Reddit transported back to September 2011.

[–]arbitrary516 1 point2 points ago

Because this is a repost from a few months back, I remember the top comment that answered this question. I believe it was: Because the crime committed by the homeless man was a violent crime.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

How is your repost acceptable??? good day sir.

[–]Do_what93 1 point2 points ago

How is this acceptable again?

This is probably the fifth time I've seen this on the front page. They were charged with two different crimes.

[–]CoyoteStark 1 point2 points ago

Because this happened last year and all comments have been made.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

I saw this on reddit alre... Oh wait...

[–]icewhisker 1 point2 points ago

What is acceptable? Old reposts?

[–]ThePiggle 1 point2 points ago

This just makes me sad.

I just hate it when homeless people are treated awfully. A murderer gets less time than that. I hope he at least gets three square meals and a bed now.

[–]mandudeguybro 1 point2 points ago

That is truly fucked

[–]hopcrook 1 point2 points ago

There are a few variables here that lead to these inequalities. For one, Louisiana has the nation's largest for-profit corrections system. That's right. Louisiana has privatized their corrections systems and companies run these. For a profit. These companies receive kickbacks from the state and make money from civilian mistakes. These kickbacks are oftentimes passed onto lawmakers, judges, and even wardens.

Why give a man 15 years? Because that's 15 years of one bed being filled in your facility. It's like a hotel. The more prisoners you keep within your walls, the more money you have coming in.

[–]rx_8 1 point2 points ago

He's now living a better life in jail sadly

[–]rayrios 1 point2 points ago

Repost!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

when the world is control by the rich and powerful elite that plot to kill those that are deemed not worthy to live simply because of there lack of weath

these things happen

[–]LaBambas 1 point2 points ago

Crimes to person are given the highest priority because a well functioning society cannot operate unless people are secure in their own persons. For that reason, we are extremely punitive regarding crimes that harm or intimidate. You can argue that the CEO should receive more time, but there is no way that the bank robber should receive less time.

The bank teller had no way of knowing that his life was not in real, immediate danger. If a security guard or police had been alerted, the homeless man could easily have been killed or pulled into a hostage situation.

Moreover, imagine the situation if the sentence imposed enforces the lesson that robberies are alright as long as you take no more than you need. Banks would be robbed as a recourse of last resort by individuals far less desperate than the typical bank robber. Each robbery has a very high risk of going sideways and resulting in a lost life. Again, maybe the CEO deserved more time, but this man didn't deserve less.

[–]ToreroTrojan 1 point2 points ago

This!!!!^

[–]AntFace 0 points1 point ago

we are extremely punitive regarding crimes that harm or intimidate

Especially when it comes to minorities, the poor, and the uneducated.

imagine the situation if the sentence imposed enforces the lesson that robberies are alright as long as you take no more than you need

I'd prefer to imagine a legal system that differentiated between a robbery done out of the desperation of a homeless man and one where say three men in masks with visible automatic weapons were threatening lives and trying to take as much money as possible. The law should judge both of these cases in the same exact way?

this man didn't deserve less

He did deserve less. He took $100. He turned himself in. He needs to be punished but fifteen years is ridiculous. I bet his sentence would have been a lot lower if he had hired an attorney instead of using a State provided one.

[–]LaBambas 0 points1 point ago

I bet that there are mandatory minimum sentences for robbing a bank.

[–]bleeding_dying_love 1 point2 points ago

The homeless man though will now have a place to live where he can stay warm, be fed, and receive medical treatment. Because his sentence is what it is, he will not be treated harshly, but instead, will most likely work in the canteen (the kitchen). the only reason I am even aware of this is because my parents both worked in prisons and i had been there enough to visit that I know the workings of it. all in all this was most likely the best thing to do for the man rather than allowing him to go free and die on the streets.

[–]holy_paladin_irl 1 point2 points ago

If you want to help out and alleviate the trouble that homeless people have to go through everyday just to survive, then I suggest you do at least one of the following:

  1. volunteer at a soup kitchen. I did this a few times and honestly the experience was life changing.

  2. if a homeless person asks you for money, offer to buy them some food instead. I was at Newark Penn Station and this guy asked me for a dollar. I asked him if he was hungry and he said yes, so I took him to Subway and got him a foot long chicken breast sub, and got him two more to take with him.

  3. invest in affordable housing projects, or become a "sponsor" for homeless people. Yes, there are some people who are homeless because they're on drugs or whatever, but we as members of society should take care of each other. Help those who can't help themselves better themselves. Help them be proud of themselves when they are capable of providing for themselves.

I am shocked when people who make tons of money (Newark Penn Station and NY Penn Station is basically chock full of well-to-do people) but turn a blind eye to homeless people. If someone asks me for food, I don't fucking say no. If I have the money to spare, I gladly give it. If not (I don't really carry cash anymore, I have a single $20 bill for emergency) I kindly apologize. I offer to buy them food instead :)

There's no need to be a douche and tell them to fuck off.

We've all been at low points in life, and even if it wasn't so low that you had no home, I'm sure you depended on someone else to at least help you get one foot on the greener side, per se.

Finally, I make enough to be happy and provide for myself (to a certain extent; I'm still a college student) and spare some for good causes. Do I really need that brand new graphics card, or can I use that money to feed a bunch of people for a week or more?

Come on people, its not hard.

[–]toga-Blutarsky 0 points1 point ago

You're a good person and I really want you to know that. My family has been fairly well-off but we also contribute some of what we have. My dad's cousin ran away when he was a teenager and wound up on the streets in San Francisco as a heroin addict. He(my dad) got a call about ten years after they last heard from him when he said that he found out he was HIV positive and wanted to come back to live with his parents before he died.(He had something bad but I didn't want to pry into that.) It was absolutely heartbreaking but was incredibly eye opening.

The double standards on this site are amazing. "hey, the government won't help out the homeless! We should revolt!" While at the same time they ignore them on the street and ignore any ways of helping them out. I don't have time to volunteer as a teenager but we still donate dry goods, blankets, old clothing, and money every month. It's the real life karma that feels good, not the attention. I really hope your post isn't buried because it's such a simply reminder that people need to know about. Community service isn't just court-ordered.

[–]holy_paladin_irl 0 points1 point ago

It's great that you want to help out.

You might like volunteering at a hospital or something. I did that when i was in high school. 3 hours every Friday night. It also looks great when you apply for jobs or to college :)

[–]hamhead 1 point2 points ago

r/wtf is not for politics or posts with political implications (See sidebar).

[–]tokeyoh 1 point2 points ago

people who post this article are fucking retarded. congratufuckinglations.

[–]mattroch 1 point2 points ago

It's a repost, and there's not a date on the homeless mans article, plus the guy comitting fraud didn't commit a "violent" crime, while the homeless man did, even if he didn't have a real gun, it's still the same in the eyes of the law. Although it's very unfortunate, it is what is...

[–]MinecraftMan1 0 points1 point ago

You know what makes this even more disgusting?

The same guy posted the same link with the same title five months ago and it got 1166 POINTS.

-_-

[–]mattroch 0 points1 point ago

Race you to repost it again, on the count of three...

[–]MinecraftMan1 0 points1 point ago

Instead of reposting, shall we send HeavenSk8 some mail telling him to explain his actions?

He's truly fucked when he goes back to /r/WTF

[–]mattroch 0 points1 point ago

Better idea, lets find him, get a crew and surround his home. We'll taunt him and tell him unless he shows himself, we'll burn the place and waste his whole family. He will eventually walk out in hopes to protect his family, after which, we'll tie him to a chair and use scotch brand tape to hold his eyes open. Then we can freely relocate him back inside his own home, set him in the middle of the family room, then proceed to rape his kids one by one, sawing their heads off after we're done with each one. After will be the grand finale, we'll bring down his wife, tear her clothes off, and gang rape her, blow it in her mouth and force her to spit our combined semen onto her bound husbands face, he'll be disgusted and horrified, as well as mortified about the death of his children, then we can use a carpenter saw to slowly take her head off while she screams for him to help her. Then i say we hit mighty taco for a bean and cheese, they are the shit, you'll love it! It's prolly the best burrito you will ever eat!!

[–]MinecraftMan1 0 points1 point ago

Personally, I prefer my own tacos. Soft tortilla, beef mince, onion, hot chilis, tomato sauce and a Coca-Cola on the side.

Then, a nice bag of Maltesers after that.

:D

Great stuff: The post has been deleted after a barrage of 200 downvotes knocked the karma count down. :D

[–]mattroch 0 points1 point ago

what i thought people liked mighty taco?!?!

[–]mattroch 0 points1 point ago

Love the soft taco thouh, delicous

[–]MinecraftMan1 0 points1 point ago

I don't think Australia has Mighty Taco.

We have Taco Bill though.

[–]mattroch 0 points1 point ago

Australia, fuck, i'm up too late, i live in rochester new york, you're my alarm to go to bed, buddy

[–]mattroch 0 points1 point ago

Seriously, i feel that instead of bitching, inflating news stories, taking strange quotes far out of context, or starting large unorganized protests, if we want to be heard it's up to us. The new wave is "hey i go to work sometimes, i do just enough not to get fired, and i have had this job for like two months... Where's my promotion?" If we want to be taken seriously; lets show the powers that be that we are serious, we work hard, we work long hours, we are team players, we are together working for a shared goal! Not only that, but we are the future, we are the workers, we are the real decision makers! Stress that you have the right to vote, you have the right to change our path, without us there is no United States, and WE DEMAND OUR MOMENT TO BE HEARD!! I emplore you reddit, cut your hair, press your shirts, and wear your best tie. To be heard is to be seen!!! You want to be heard by the "1%" then talk to them as they are, not as we are! Dress and speak as if you are in the job you want, not in the job you have! We will overcome, we will be prosperous, and we will most certainly be respected and heard.

[–]DigDub 1 point2 points ago

"There's two kinds of laws, honey. One for the rich and one for the poor" - In Cold Blood

[–]Laeryken 1 point2 points ago

That's a good question. How do we possibly accept this being reposted yet again?! You even posted this already. Are you fucking kidding me? Don't ever post on reddit again.

[–]Stopher 0 points1 point ago

It's not acceptable. It's just that when you steal a few billion you have a lot of spare money for lawyers. That guy that stole a hundred bucks just didn't go big enough.

[–]BlueThundah 1 point2 points ago

The homeless man now has free meals and a place to sleep for the next 15 years.

:/

[–]circa 0 points1 point ago

free beatings, rape, stabbings, STDs, diseases... oh boy what a great place to be. let's all go.

":/"

[–]athenafire 0 points1 point ago

Did NO ONE else notice it was in Shreveport ...??

Am I the only one that watches true blood here?

[–]Champhall 0 points1 point ago

i am completely against the unfairness of this, but maybe they wanted to give him shelter and food for the rest of his life.

[–]HobKing 0 points1 point ago

It's not and no one thinks it is. The person who sentenced him either had a good reason we don't know about or is an idiot/insane.

[–]hergumbules 0 points1 point ago

i am guessing the homeless guy was charged with armed robbery. which is a very harsh law because you are putting someone in danger. stealing from a company doesn't put a threat to anybody's life.

[–]thepredestrian 0 points1 point ago

Is it because the homeless man is black?

[–]Im_smarter_than_you 0 points1 point ago

It depends on whether the bottom guy used a gun in my opinion. No gun, it's outrageous. I have no tolerance for violent robberies though. It scars the teller for life.

[–]midnightauto 0 points1 point ago

It's Louisisna, the Parish run prisons are private and need fresh new meat.

[–]AnusPounder 0 points1 point ago

because one is actually a productive member of society

[–]roblehman 0 points1 point ago

REPOST

[–]xteve 0 points1 point ago

It's acceptable because it's multiply reposted. Go fuck off, please.

[–]Frosticus 0 points1 point ago

Welcome to America where the laws are made up and the charges don't matter

[–]WolfLarson 0 points1 point ago

Amerikuh! Fuck yeh!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

This is all about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, unfortunately money gets you very far in life, more so than ethics. That's the way it is, but we need to change that!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

This is really fucked up. I want to become a judge just to make sure shit like this doesn't happen. Sadly there were no detox places available for him to get free care and become productive in society again. He probably had some mental problems or at least serious addiction problems to be homeless. We need to stop looking at addiction as a crime and help the addicts. If you don't agree with me I hope you're never effected in a way that makes you agree with me, it sucks to understand the whole drug addiction thing firs hand.

[–]bob-leblaw 0 points1 point ago

After an hour on r/JusticePorn, this makes me even sadder. Sometimes the fat kid really does get beat up by the bully.

[–]Zanco69 0 points1 point ago

Thats just not right :P

[–]LennyBruceLeeMarvin 0 points1 point ago

There's no justice. There's just us.

[–]freakedoutbunny 0 points1 point ago

Someone get Alan Dershowitz on the case!

[–]LazLoe 0 points1 point ago

Dude got 3 hots and a cot for 15 years, plus free healthcare. Seems a better deal than being homeless..

[–]SerriaClover 0 points1 point ago

Think about it. He is a homeless man and prison offers food, shelter, and clothing. Yes, many people find it to be harsh, but if you didn't have a home...anythings better then nothing. He was basically sentenced to 15 years of a place to stay.

[–]kevkevmacattack 0 points1 point ago

An old saying goes:

Those with a guilty conscious go to jail Those with no remorse are out on bail The poor are in prison The rich are in a 4 season A small crime is punished with time A large crime is forgiven with dimes People are stupid Potato

[–]ThatPRGuy 0 points1 point ago

[–]ToreroTrojan 0 points1 point ago

One of these cases involves actions which threaten the LIVES of human beings...the other is awful as well but merely affects the financial well being of others.

[–]gman1401 0 points1 point ago

How is this acceptable? Let me explain:

One was a violent crime committed by someone who likely has a previous criminal record, one was non violent, likely committed by someone who does not have a criminal background.

Other factors to consider are the fact that they took place in two different states that have different laws and statutes, whether or not the federal agents rather than state agents were involved, the way the defendant composed themselves in court, the particular judge, and the capabilities of the defense attorneys.

So it is acceptable and fair. There are more mitigating factors than then amount stolen. People need to learn this and get a grasp on how the Untied States court and judicial system works before making assumptions.

edit: gramerz

[–]TChuff 0 points1 point ago

This again. Why is acceptable that we can just put up half the story. The guy had priors that caused the 15 year sentence.

[–]skipperbob 0 points1 point ago

That's America baby!

[–]subspacer 0 points1 point ago

Louisiana is the prison capital of the world...

[–]Kindern 0 points1 point ago

The homeless guy had previous aswell, i remember this from about a year ago.

oh and theft and robbery aren't the same thing.

[–]elusiveinhouston 0 points1 point ago

And Paul Allen. I killed Paul Allen with an axe in the face, his body is dissolving in a bathtub in Hell's Kitchen.

[–]SupermanRitz 0 points1 point ago

I don't want to live on this planet anymore

[–]shard972 0 points1 point ago

Just goes to show that if you want to commit a crime, go big or go home.

[–]search144 0 points1 point ago

This is sad,

[–]fractal7 -1 points0 points ago

Well bank robbery is a federal crime, white collar fraud is just regular crime. He had a court appointed lawyer, the rich guy had the best law team possible. I like how the reporter claims that the 40 month sentence was just slightly less then the requested 72 month sentence.

[–]bax101 0 points1 point ago

There used to be a bum in my home town who every winter commited a petty crime so he could land himself in jail so he didn't have to sleep in the cold.

[–]SoCo_cpp 0 points1 point ago

Sentencing guidelines, aren't they perfect justice!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

This shit is UN FUCKING ACCEPTABLE. I would go on a long rant about why, but every one here knows why and it wouldn't help the situation.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Of course, reddit tries to rationalize this shit instead of accepting that the justice and economic systems here are super fucked up.