this post was submitted on
1,774 points (56% like it)
7,358 up votes 5,584 down votes

pics

subscribe2,466,048 readers

4,720 users here now

Submit your Halloween pumpkin pics to /r/horror's carving competition!

A place to share interesting photographs and pictures. Feel free to post your own, but please read the rules first (see below), and note that we are not a catch-all for general images (of screenshots, comics, etc.)

Spoiler code

Please mark spoilers like this:
[text here](/spoiler)

Hover over to read.

Rules

  1. No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, info-graphics and most diagrams. Text (e.g. a URL) serving to credit the original author is exempt.

  2. No gore or porn. NSFW content must be tagged.

  3. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking & harassment will not be tolerated.

  4. No solicitation of votes (including "cake day" posts), posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor, or [FIXED] posts. DAE posts go in /r/DoesAnybodyElse. "Fixed" posts should be added as a comment to the original image.

  5. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to an image hosting website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

  • If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don't delete it as that just makes the filter hate you!

  • If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it!

Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichés/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning.

Links

If your post doesn't meet the above rules, consider submitting it on one of these other subreddits:

Comics  
/r/comics /r/webcomics
/r/vertical /r/f7u12
/r/ragenovels /r/AdviceAtheists
Image macros Screenshots/text
/r/lolcats /r/screenshots
/r/AdviceAnimals /r/desktops
/r/Demotivational /r/facepalm (Facebook)
/r/reactiongifs /r/DesktopDetective
Wallpaper Animals
/r/wallpaper /r/aww
/r/wallpapers /r/cats
The SFWPorn Network /r/TrollingAnimals
  /r/deadpets
  /r/birdpics
  /r/foxes
Photography Un-moderated pics
/r/photography /r/AnythingGoesPics
/r/photocritique /r/images
/r/HDR
/r/windowshots
/r/PictureChallenge
Misc New reddits
/r/misc /r/britpics
/r/gifs Imaginary Network
/r/dataisbeautiful /r/thennnow
/r/picrequests /r/SpecArt
/r/LookWhoIMet
  /r/timelinecovers
  /r/MemesIRL
  /r/OldSchoolCool
  /r/photoshopbattles

Also check out http://irc.reddit.com

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]dudeman209 519 points520 points ago

Those helicopters are enormous!

EDIT: Fun fact, the rotor disc area is 1/5 of an acre. My old house had about that much land, not much I know, but we're talking about a helicopter.

[–]Lurking_And_Stalking 229 points230 points ago

Yeah! I thought they were flying and were closer to the camera, but nope. Bigass helis.

[–]tiger637 650 points651 points ago

It's the radiation.

[–]hells_cowbells 115 points116 points ago

If I have learned anything from the Hulk and the Fallout series of games, it's that radiation exposure makes everything bigger.

[–]That_Annoying_Kid 198 points199 points ago

Guys I think we have found a way to make a fuck ton of money and sterilize idiots.

[–]poundtownbrown 50 points51 points ago

This is genius.

[–]omnomnomnomnomnomn0m 36 points37 points ago

Yeah my dick would be huge!

[–]joelupi 73 points74 points ago

"best case scenario, you might get some superpowers. Worst case, some tumors which we'll cut out"

[–]FuzzyBacon 62 points63 points ago

"I'll be honest, we're throwing science at the walls here to see what sticks."

[–]ShowSStopper 15 points16 points ago

"You may have noticed that your blood is pure gasoline - that's normal. We've been shooting you with an invisible beam that's supposed to turn blood into gasoline, so all that means is it's working."

[–]FuzzyBacon 11 points12 points ago

"Alright this next test may involve trace amounts of time travel. So word of advice: if you meet yourself on the testing track don't make eye contact. Lab boys tell me that'll wipe out time - entirely. Forward and backward. So do both of yourselves a favor and let that handsome devil go about his business."

[–]rwbombc 19 points20 points ago

Time to expose my junk to gamma rays. For science.

Worst that can happen is it turns green when mad. Instead of purple now.

[–]xaraan 29 points30 points ago

I always joked about making an "Incredible Cock" porno (not like the recent hulk in avenger all green) where just the penis got big and green with the whole "you wouldn't like me when I'm horny" and it busts out of his pants or something. idk, I'm shaking my head at myself at this point.

[–]Vladger 3 points4 points ago

I could totally see that working for a big gay bear porn...

[–]CavitySearch 2 points3 points ago

A nice contrast since the only thing that would rip would be the pants.

[–]hells_cowbells 6 points7 points ago

BRILLIANT!

Edit: I don't even want to know what your superhero name will be after that happens.

[–]SirGrover 2 points3 points ago

It worked for Randy Marsh...at first.

[–]Eat_a_Bullet 6 points7 points ago

What about Ant Man?

[–]hells_cowbells 15 points16 points ago

Allergic reaction to radiation.

[–]Eat_a_Bullet 2 points3 points ago

That's how much Ant Man sucks. He was made smaller and weaker by superhero-irradiation.

[–]Backstyck 14 points15 points ago

TIL what happened to everything in Texas.

[–]feureau 64 points65 points ago

Makes sense.

[–]Trapped_in_Reddit 212 points213 points ago

[–]feureau 33 points34 points ago

Are they personnel transport helis or one of those that you can put a tank inside?

[–]feureau 52 points53 points ago

[–]WrethZ 70 points71 points ago

Yo dawg...

[–]agentcoulson 6 points7 points ago

Its Blackout!

[–]Sojoez 16 points17 points ago

Heh.. American.... Sikorsky, the father of helicopters.

[–]RedOctShtandingBy 8 points9 points ago

Good point but it was American built.

[–]wewd 5 points6 points ago

Igor Sikorsky was a naturalized American, and Sikorsky Aircraft is an American company.

[–]JamaicanAirlines 27 points28 points ago

9 killstreak. I remember. Pave Low > rest

[–]Bladewing10 17 points18 points ago

"Enemy Pave Low inbound!"

FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUU....

[–]AngriestCosmonaut 11 points12 points ago

Put a tank inside of it? Why would you want to put a tank inside of a flying tank?

[–]jcrawfordor 45 points46 points ago

Yo dawg...

[–]f3rn4ndrum5 23 points24 points ago

MI-26 carrying Chinook http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/helicopters/size/mi26_01.jpg

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/helicopters/q0284.shtml

Edit: MI-26 Edit2: Also my office overlooks a MI-26 hangar in Caracas, Venezuela

[–]fluffypenguin 2 points3 points ago

Biggest heli in the world!

[–]Alot_Hunter 12 points13 points ago

Although if you believe CoD, you can take one down with a few shots from an M4.

[–]randumnumber 46 points47 points ago

I think they are MI-6 Heavy Transport Helis. If they are they have a carrying capacity of 12000kg

[–]AngryCanadian 42 points43 points ago

Those things are monsters. i dont think people realize how big those things actually are. Do you see those exhaust turbines? when i was 10 or 11 we had one of those suckers placed on a monument outside of my school (soviets loved making monuments out of old military hardware), i was able to literally walk inside that exhaust turbine...

[–]chrometoucan 28 points29 points ago

look how big this one is! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-12

[–]pifarm 104 points105 points ago

GUYS

LETS TAKE A 747

AND MAKE IT A HELICOPTER

[–]Dr_HL 5 points6 points ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKsWTdjnXiw Here's some footage of it flying.

[–]philipito 7 points8 points ago

I knew I had seen that design before from somewhere...

[–]rage_erection 23 points24 points ago

Perfect for lifting a block of gold out of the deep woods...

[–]SirNoName 6 points7 points ago

[–]el_muerte17 4 points5 points ago

It's no Mi-26, but still pretty damn huge...

[–]holger-danske 11 points12 points ago

Those helicopters are enormous!

WOLVERINES!!!! - C Thomas Howell

[–]WOLVERINES 14 points15 points ago

[–]eresonance 91 points92 points ago

I know a guy who worked on those very helicopters, he was part of the crew that flew over the reactor dropping concrete on it or something like that. He's the only one from the crew that hasn't died from cancer :(

[–]I_POTATO_PEOPLE 50 points51 points ago

I was under the impression that the Soviets rotated the workers through very quickly to minimize their exposure. The International Atomic Energy Agency concluded in this 2005 report that only 5% of workers at the site died of related cancers.

Thoughts? Was your friend bullshitting you?

[–]mossoi 78 points79 points ago

While the earlier flights to drop material on the core did hover directly above and receive higher doses of radiation it was very quickly determined that this was not a good idea. Later flights were done at speed to avoid excessive doses of radiation for the pilots.

"There were 1,125 helicopter pilots involved in 1,800 flights over the Chernobyl reactor over some months. The first flights hovered over the damaged reactor to drop material on the core, but this was soon discontinued because measured radiation levels were too high. Sound familiar? Subsequent material drops were done in passing rather than while hovering and were consequently less accurate but less risky. Had the evil Soviet empire wanted suicide missions it would have ordered pilots to hover. As it was, much of the material intended to blanket the core missed … precisely because no-one wanted to kill pilots and nobody did. Pilots involved in the early flights received on average 260 milli Sieverts of radiation which definitely elevates their cancer risk, not as much as in the people puffing near fire-escapes on city offices these days, but still a significant increase. Pilots flying later in the cleanup received a dose of about half this and none suffered acute radiation sickness." - http://bravenewclimate.com/2011/04/18/helicopters-tall-stories-journalism/

Notice the ratio of pilots to flights? Only a percentage of them flew over the core more than once.

I agree with you, this does smell a little of BS.

The liquidators who went into the reactor with a shovel and a badly made lead vest, on the other hand, had a very hard time of it.

[–]coaxfun 47 points48 points ago

Here's the satellite view. I think it gives you a better idea of the scale.

[–]misterschmoo 9 points10 points ago

Why no street view, man google are lazy:-)

[–]cpbrowner 2 points3 points ago

There's street view of Chernobyl and Pripyat (abandoned town of once 50,000).. which is pretty sick http://masterrussian.net/f13/pripyat-street-view-wow-18358/

[–]hipsterdysplasia 4 points5 points ago

Yes and those are armored vehicles in the front. BMPs are not small.

[–]narwhalsare_unicorns 3 points4 points ago

WTF this should be on the top

[–]I_POTATO_PEOPLE 6 points7 points ago

Well, since his friend is alive they presumably did not crash into the melted reactor...

[–]Aschebescher 28 points29 points ago

the Soviet's rotated the workers through very quickly to minimize their exposure

You can do that with people working a shovel but helicopter crews seem far to specialized to have enough of them.

[–]I_POTATO_PEOPLE 56 points57 points ago

They used over a thousand helicopter pilots. A few flew twice, but most flew only one mission. This was the height of the Cold War, so the Soviets had no shortage of manpower.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points ago

The effort to contain the disaster is absolutely fascinating, and a little bit harrowing. Anybody know of a good documentary about it?

[–]OilyBobbyFlay 29 points30 points ago

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl

[–]YugoCanadian 13 points14 points ago

Yes!!!

BBC Horizons had an episode dedicated to it and it's one of the most amazing shows that I've ever witnessed. They were the first TV crew to go to Chernobyl and this was during the cleanup.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otFQcmE3G5s

Comes complete with the creepy audio from converting from a VHS tape :)

[–]SnarferX 2 points3 points ago

The Battle for Chernobyl is a good one to start, but does overstate some statistics. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv3a4LXi_qc&list=PLC8E72306A759FD5C&feature=mh_lolz)

[–]oddurth 1 point2 points ago

Dude, it was the Soviet Union. Population of close to 300.000.000 people on a land mass of 22.000.000 square kilometers. I think they'd have a number of helicopter pilots.

[–]randygiesinger 6 points7 points ago

I have seen one in person, they are even bigger than you think

[–]benjoefoe 3 points4 points ago

Heli big copters

[–]CitizenTed 244 points245 points ago

If you are interested in some of the stories of the men who operated those helicopters and military vehicles, read Svetlana Alexievich's book "Voices from Chernobyl". These first-hand accounts are gripping and sometimes horribly sad. But some stories are of heroism on an epic scale as well.

I'll never forget the helicopter pilot who was dumping cement onto the glowing reactor core and actually felt pins and needles of radiation shooting up into him from his pilot's chair (he was gone within a year). Absolutely riveting stuff.

[–]marketinequality 105 points106 points ago

That second paragraph creeped the fuck out of me.

[–]staplesgowhere 65 points66 points ago

IIRC the sharp tingling feeling is from nerve cells dying instantly upon exposure to high levels of radiation.

[–]hellvetican 11 points12 points ago

I've never heard of what it's like to be hit with radiation like that. Now it makes it even scarier.

[–]unkeljoe 2 points3 points ago

just propaganda, nuke energy is perfectly safe

[–]pm11 83 points84 points ago

Now every time my foot falls asleep I'll wonder whether or not I'm receiving a fatal dose of radiation.

[–]CuntyMcshitballs 33 points34 points ago

Don't worry you are! Sweet dreams!

[–]WhitePantherXP 21 points22 points ago

"Gone" as in died correct? I've watched many documentaries and have read a lot about Chernobyl, I wish more people knew about it in depth. It was the worst, there are still live-in hospitals of children with odd deformities from the disaster, real "hills have eyes" type defects (youtube). A large amount of the men who worked on Chernobyl are dead from cancer and various other radiation causes, one of the pilots actually died while pouring material to cool the reactor (iirc), I believe he lost consciousness and his helicopter went down. Terrible tragedy. I'd love to visit it, there are a few people who still live in the abandoned city.

[–]zukeen 13 points14 points ago

That pilot actually hit the cables hovering from the crane.

[–]DukeOfGeek 196 points197 points ago

Wow, the recreation of this in S.T.A.L.K.E.R Shadow of Chernobyl was spot on.

[–]MastaYodel 22 points23 points ago

i was thinkin the same thing. still have fond memories of the bandit invasion and the artifacts glowing the the corners there

[–]DukeOfGeek 4 points5 points ago

Yep, start fighting them from the abandoned guard booth, then fall back to the rusty buses!

[–]GODDAMNFOOL 28 points29 points ago

Thank Christ a STALKER SoC comment was above a Call of Duty comment.

[–]martyrdod 5 points6 points ago

Yeah I knew a lot of Stalker is modeled after actual places but I had no idea this was a real place. Gave me chills opening up this image.

[–]Red_Dawn_2012 157 points158 points ago

Here's a medal I have... It was given to all people who helped clean up after the disaster.

http://i.imgur.com/SaXr5.jpg

[–]Grommett 17 points18 points ago

I think this would make for an interesting AMA. The stories he could tell would be lovely and scary to hear.

[–]manberry_sauce 6 points7 points ago

A commenter in another reply thread above recommended Svetlana Alexievich's book "Voices from Chernobyl"

comment

I take "here's a medal I have" and the name Red_Dawn_2012 to mean that Mr. Dawn is a collector, not a participant in the cleanup.

[–]Grommett 2 points3 points ago

Oh that's something to take note of. But, Never the less I think someone who survived the cleanup would be an amazing AMA.

[–]Herschey 23 points24 points ago

That's awesome and deserving! Could you read what that says?

[–]0rangecake 35 points36 points ago

Contributor to the liquidation of the aftermath of the disaster at CNPP.

[–]Lilday 20 points21 points ago

From what I remember the 'liquidators' were the people who sacrificed the most during the clean up. I remember one part of a documentary where they went on to the roof and had to handle to graphite casings which held the uranium.

Crazy shit.

[–]WhitePantherXP 3 points4 points ago

And WHOA, please give us an AMA. Do you suffer from any health issues today? What was your role? How long were you there?

[–]ttyler 10 points11 points ago

It might not be their medal, but a family members, or even purchased.

[–]Countess112 5 points6 points ago

Were you actually one of the people in there or was it given by a relative?

[–]numeroprimo[S] 131 points132 points ago

"More than 1,300 Soviet military helicopters, buses, bulldozers, and other equipment were usedand contaminatedwhile responding to the April 26, 1986 nuclear accident at Chernobyl." Source

[–]hinduguru 45 points46 points ago

This looks like a toy set. All these machines could do so much damage, sorta surreal

[–]Hurrfdurf 48 points49 points ago

I doubt most of them could do anything but sit there and give you cancer after 30 years of being outside in a field.

[–]WonderWeasel42 22 points23 points ago

What is the halflife of the Chernobyl radiation?

[–]lessthan_i 28 points29 points ago

30 years. Source

[–]reverendjay 27 points28 points ago

That would be well and good if it was the only radioactive isotope there, and a limited quantity. Seeing as there's a lot of radioactive material (A little more than 100kg from reactor 4 I do believe) in that area it will likely be several thousands of years before the inclusion zone is safe to inhabit. As for the area inside the sarcophagus, it has become so irradiated it is impossible to determine if or when it will be habitable again.

"Ukrainian officials estimate the area will not be safe for human life again for another 20,000 years" - Disasters that shook the world. New York: Time Books, 2012.

Great book to read, perfect for a bathroom reader. Time is a rather reliable source, very informative, little bias on things, and are great at weaving beautiful works of literature.

[–]JL235 33 points34 points ago

There is a surprisingly high number of animals living around the Chernobyl disaster. One of the main reasons is because they have very little human intervention, due to the very small numbers of people still living and working in the area.

But scientists have also found animals to be more healthy then expected. It's theorised that a little radiation actually helps to build up a natural resistance. It could also be that only the naturally resistant animals survived, and have then just bread extensively, due to the lack of competitors. This has also been shown with worms living in contaminated soil; one species is resistant, all the others die out, and the resistant species then breeds more then usual.

There is a huge amount of life there! And that's excluding the mutants and zombies.

[–]reverendjay 22 points23 points ago

Seeing as my studies are in wildlife and forestry I've done a lot of research in to this. I resent your use of healthy in that statement. There are clean and irradiated spots in the alien zone and that makes a big difference in their studies. Birds are one of the top bioindicators due to their fairly quick generational rates (Darwin's finches for example). While the birds in the clean areas are relatively fine those in the irradiated area have significant development issues most notably smaller brains. Also important to note is the lack of diversity (by as much as half) and the vastly decreased population sizes (as little as 25%) compared to the clean areas.

So yes, while the animals in a way do survive better without human interaction, including reemergence of species not seen in hundreds of years in that area. Often these animals are plagued by albinism and severe external and internal mutations with much lower life expectancy.

[–]JL235 13 points14 points ago

In fairness I said 'healthy then expected', not healthy, and that was deliberate. Animals have been living there more successfully then than expected.

[–]The_Barnacle 4 points5 points ago

PBS had a very interesting documentary about wildlife in Chernobyl. It's pretty amazing how nature is thriving without humans interfering. Link to the video from PBS site

[–]skarface6 2 points3 points ago

Question- I was under the impression that amount of matter doesn't affect its half-life. Are you saying otherwise?

[–]reverendjay 4 points5 points ago

You are technically correct, which is the best kind of correct! But look at it like this:

You have one pound of a substance, it take .25 lbs of that substance to be fatal. With a half life of one hundred years it will take a little over 200 years for you to be able to survive in an area with that substance.

Half life means the time it takes for a substance to decay by half, so yea, half life is still half life. However, we have to take into consideration the LD-50 of a substance as well (or I suppose in this case more the quantity and the curies a certain amount of that substance puts out).

Yea, about half of that cesium-137 has decayed already, but there is still (for lack of my knowledge) roughly a metric fuck ton left of it in the soil, water, dust in the air and dust settling on everything in that vicinity. Not to mention the 10 or so other highly radioactive elements that make up the fuel and coolant systems of a nuclear reactor. Plus issues with things like fires that stir up the radioactive materials that have been absorbed by the grasses and trees the radiation is constantly being re-released into the atmosphere. This has proved an interesting concern with the building of the, whats it called, NCS? The new containment system? to replace the sarcophagus. Some seriously interesting reading out there on all this.

[–]ac_slat3r 18 points19 points ago

More interesting is that they were all used for good/help which lead to them being left to rust in this graveyard.

[–]magic_city_man 75 points76 points ago

It was a very chernobyl act.

[–]BrainSlurper 3 points4 points ago

Their sacrifice is a radiant example for vehicles everywhere.

[–]Jutboy 5 points6 points ago

So the moral of the story is don't do good.

[–]Anand999 55 points56 points ago

I found this video taken near what looks to be the same vehicle graveyard:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8757764129723143885

Here it is on Google Maps: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=51.154192,+29.981956&hl=en&ll=51.153667,29.983125&spn=0.004818,0.013937&sll=51.400082,30.074737&sspn=0.009585,0.027874&t=w&z=17

EDIT: The vantage point of the shot seems to be near the NE corner of the graveyard (which, incidentally, appears to be the entrance) looking SW.

Near the top of the right most row, there is a vehicle parked diagonally which I believe is the blue tanker truck in the foreground of this picture.

[–]flickworms 7 points8 points ago

Came to comments looking for google maps, thanks for this.

[–]nacho-bitch 2 points3 points ago

Site with more pics and map.

[–]st3ph3n 29 points30 points ago

According to OP's link the photo was taken in the year 2000. Who is mowing this place?!

[–]lurksworth 94 points95 points ago

Stalkers.

[–]BigTinz 15 points16 points ago

well they better get out of there....

[–]S_T_A_L_K_E_R 83 points84 points ago

I can confirm this.

[–]emaG_ehT 18 points19 points ago

[–]Dannybaker 26 points27 points ago

What people do for karma

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]GODDAMNFOOL 5 points6 points ago

The better question is, after looking at the 2012 Google Maps satellite picture, who's keeping those paths fresh? Paths don't normally last a year without being constantly used, let alone over 25 years.

[–]metalninjacake 4 points5 points ago

Guys, obviously people are still living here, among the hills, creeping around, there are eyes in the hills, etc.

Nbd.

[–]zukeen 5 points6 points ago

Radioactivity or rare Mowing Artifact

[–]01000001010011100100 29 points30 points ago

I don't know why, but I am absolutely fascinated by Chernobyl and Fukushima. I've been reading up and watching documentaries and just can't get enough... I so want to go on one of those tours through Prypiat/Chernobyl. That would be a dream come true. The immense invisible power these accidents have and the way esp. Chernobyl was handled in the months after it happened are just jaw dropping. I thought everything would be over in a few days. Not months and months of fighting to keep subsequent explosions and fallout under control. Sending unknowing soldiers unprotected in highly contaminated areas...

[–]Shrimpy266 10 points11 points ago

I have the same fascination as you. For some reason learning about an area that was abandoned by thousands of people so quickly and isn't inhabitable for thousands of years because of an "invisible force" that could kill us by sitting on a park bench is fascinating.

[–]andlife 43 points44 points ago

Karlsplatz station in Vienna has a count of the number of days left until Chernobyl is inhabitable again. Only 140000 and something days left!

[–]granniet 14 points15 points ago

So... that's after Star Trek TNG is set :)

[–]Darthmalt 17 points18 points ago

For the lazy among us thats 383 years and change

[–]reverendjay 3 points4 points ago

I find this odd as I was just reading a book by Time Magazine on this subject and the Ukrainian government suspects it could be 20,000 years or more before the area is habitable again...

[–]chthonical 30 points31 points ago

I link this every time Chernobyl comes up. It's worth a watch.

BBC NOVA Suicide Mission To Chernobyl 1991

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8a3GHABedA

[–]rwbombc 17 points18 points ago

Youtube comments are the best:
"You guys are talking like Chernobyl and Fukushima are done. The sarcophagus is on the brink of collapse and Fukishima is still releasing radioactivity into the air and sea. And that's not even considering the possibility of reactor 4's housing collapse and the spent fuel rod pool on it's roof. To say Fukushima wasn't bad at all is to imply that it's a situation which is now under control. That is far from reality. I imagine your wishful thinking is the only thing your mind will comprehend "

[–]kevlarbomb 9 points10 points ago

Interesting timing with Chernobyl Diaries coming out this weekend. SECRET MOVIE MARKETING PERSON HAS INFILTRATED REDDIT??!?!?

[–]thejuraj 5 points6 points ago

Garbage!

[–]xzzz 2 points3 points ago

This needs to be upvoted more. My first thought too. STALKER is awesome.

[–]jokes_on_you 21 points22 points ago

They offer tours of Chernobyl now (source). I wonder if you could jack a few tanks. A little radiation is worth a tank, right?

[–]dixiegunsmoke 31 points32 points ago

I remember seeing somewhere a fully functional rebuilt russian tank is only something ike $150,000

[–]Trapped_in_Reddit 88 points89 points ago

+11 RADS/SEC

[–]i_am_from_cleveland 22 points23 points ago

APPLY RAD-X: RAD RES. +35%

[–]Sibblin 5 points6 points ago

Don't forget the rad suit. I always preferred the power armor though.

[–]illvm 8 points9 points ago

It's okay, tank comes with vodka.

[–]Im_why_Waldos_hiding 1 point2 points ago

It's ok, I've got Rad-X.

[–]what_the_actual_luck 6 points7 points ago

functional to drive? Yes. Functional to fire? Surely not.

[–]EasybakeovensAreSexy 3 points4 points ago

You can buy APCs and Tanks. I believe they range from 20 or 30 thousand up to 180 and 200 thousand.

[–]Hugs_n_Nugs 8 points9 points ago

why so many military vehicles? I don't really see how the tanks (or whatever the line of armed vehicles are) would help during the disaster?

[–]SirNoName 19 points20 points ago

They're armored personnel carriers. The military sent a ton of people to Chernobyl to assist with the cleanup and evacuation.

[–]Lyeta 12 points13 points ago

In the USSR, the largest source of labor available at a moments notice was the military.

Need a lot of people to do stuff without questioning why? Soviet troops it is.

[–]BoxoMorons 2 points3 points ago

they also used the miners to help mine under the reactor.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]tostrinj 40 points41 points ago

Yeah, kind of like that. They did not tell us at first (we were in a town about 100k away from the whole mess), but my folks both chemists came home from work and shipped us to our relatives in a distant part of the country. My dad was supposed to be sent there, but his health was not the best, so he got lucky. My uncle was and died horribly after.

[–]WhitePantherXP 4 points5 points ago

Very sorry for your loss. In response to Laztaxco, they would not make you leave after the 45 seconds, you would be back at it some 3 hours later iirc. It was shift work, you would be sent to the roof to shovel off as much radioactive material you can in 45 seconds, and that material was then bulldozed by personnel on the ground. I believe a large amount if not everyone, is no longer alive who participated. The effects were not well known at the time.

[–]The_Adventurist 2 points3 points ago

At least they weren't in the military. The infantrymen were dubbed "human robots" and sent to clear the roof of the core casing, the most intensely radioactive part of the disaster area.

[–]squidgy 27 points28 points ago

A sealed vehicle with an inch or more of steel surrounding the cabin is quite useful. It offers at least some protection against both ambient radiation and fallout particles in the air, far more than one of those canvas-covered lorries.

That said, I doubt any of that even factored into the decision. That's what they had nearby, that's what they sent. The military didn't know anything about what they were heading in to, let alone about how to protect against it.

[–]BabyWookie 5 points6 points ago

Actually, most Soviet and now Russian military vehicles feature NBC filters and over-pressured cabins, and the personnel used to be extensively trained to operate in irradiated environments. Shit, we had to take mil prep classes in school, where they explained everything about the effects of nuclear weapons and drilled us in putting on NBC protection suits. Basically, the liquidators might not have been told the specifics, but they were perfectly aware of the dangers of radiation.

[–]UKRAINE_IS_STRONG 35 points36 points ago

GET OUT OF HERE STALKER

[–]PwnyBownz 9 points10 points ago

GET OUT OF HERE STALKER

[–]Karate_Kyle 2 points3 points ago

I just read that in the Brian Fellows voice. Oh my god, what is happening to me?

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points ago

That's rad.

[–]Austinlegend 2 points3 points ago

iation...

[–]CircumcisedSpine 10 points11 points ago

Get 'em for you cheap. Only one owner. Just don't check the Carfax.

[–]Vaynax 5 points6 points ago

Think of all the skill, coordination of systems, materials, and energy and effort that went into making all those machines... now all a waste..

[–]Kurskovich 2 points3 points ago

Not to shoot you down here, but saving huge amounts of lives isn't too wasteful.

One of the better uses of military hardware in my opinion.

[–]NicoleBolas 9 points10 points ago

Wow, crazy to think that none of it can be used ever again...

[–]what_the_actual_luck 8 points9 points ago

It will just take a little bit of time and it will be useful again. Questionable if it will be useful for the then-population

[–]shawnaroo 15 points16 points ago

It's highly likely that any of it is would be functional now, much less useful. Sitting out for a couple decades worth of Russian winters with no maintenance probably isn't very good for your engine.

There's probably so much rust in those vehicles that fixing them would be more work than building brand new ones.

[–]what_the_actual_luck 8 points9 points ago

It is radioactive. I doubt anyone wants to do something with the material right now.

[–]shawnaroo 4 points5 points ago

Well yeah, but my point was that by the time the radiation is gone, there won't be much of anything left, not even material for scrap.

[–]addiv 4 points5 points ago

That's hot.

[–]popepeterjames 4 points5 points ago

Yeah you aren't kidding.... these one's were even further away than the ones in that graveyard and they are still pretty hot

[–]theangrybitter 2 points3 points ago

Did anyone else notice there appears to be a figure in the fourth row going back towards the tree line?

[–]RottenDeadite 7 points8 points ago

Every time I see that shot I think of this one passage in Roadside Picnic:

When you look at it, it looks like any other piece of land. The sun shines on it like on any other part of the earth. And it's as though nothing had particularly changed in it. Like everything was the way it was thirty years ago. My father, rest his soul, could look at it and not notice anything out of place at all. Except maybe he'd ask why the plant's smokestack was still. Was there a strike or something? yellow ore piled up in cone-shaped mounds, blast furnaces gleaming in the sun, rails, rails, and more rails, a locomotive with flatcars on the rails. In other words, an industry town. Only there were no people. Neither living nor dead. You could see the garage, too: a long gray intestine, its doors wide open. The trucks were parked on the paved lot next to it. He was right about the trucks--his brains were functioning God forbid you should stick your head between two trucks. You have to sidle around them.

[–]TriLogic 2 points3 points ago

My old history teacher served during that time. He spent double the regular time helping cleaning out the mess. Got medals etc., which he showed us on one occasion. He used to tell about how creepy it was to see the apartments with breakfast on table or that the cars could only be used in the area etc. interesting things.

[–]jdrc07 2 points3 points ago

Those helicopters are HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE

[–]pepperman7 2 points3 points ago

I sell to you, good price! You buy? Yes Yes?!

[–]Eszharen 60 points61 points ago

Soap, Take the shot

[–]Predawndutchy 141 points142 points ago

Actually, it was Leftenant Price that was in Chernobyl, under the command of Captain Macmillan. Not soap.

[–]richworks 34 points35 points ago

Pripyat, Ukraine...

One hell of a level it was.. Had to fight a god damn army all alone...

[–]ed4649 47 points48 points ago

Fuck that ferris wheel area.

[–]what_american_dream 13 points14 points ago

It took me hours of raging and dying to beat it on hardest difficulty. Checkpoint came along as I was in the dark red. I'd die, reload, die, reload, die.

ಠ_ಠ

[–]Eszharen 20 points21 points ago

Hm, you're correct.

Then again, I've not played COD4 for several years at this point.

[–]snailwithmonocle 28 points29 points ago

From this distance, you have to take in account the coriolis effect.

[–]Gortos 39 points40 points ago

"What's that?" - "It's the effect that turns perfect headshots into bloody shoulder hits."

[–]ed4649 6 points7 points ago

It's always nice to revisit the COD's of old. The one's with the limited "bro" factor.

[–]wilska 15 points16 points ago

Now I have to go and play CoD4 single-player again. Thanks.

[–]Fj0ergyn 32 points33 points ago

If you're like me, then you'll get stuck at the shooting range for the next few hours because you can always be a bit faster.

[–]Bethurz 13 points14 points ago

And if you're like me, you'll only be stuck at the shooting range for the next few minutes because "fuck it, that was good enough".

[–]rounding_error 4 points5 points ago

No soap, radio!

[–]willymo 4 points5 points ago

I'm sure the Soviets had a lot of vehicles, but even so, this must've been a large blow to their supply. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's a shit load of armor going to waste.

[–]shustrik 2 points3 points ago

I highly doubt a thousand or so vehicles would make a significant dent in the country's fleet. Sure, the area around Chernobyl had to live without those vehicles for a while, but on the scale of the whole Soviet Union that was pretty much nothing.

[–]rospaya 2 points3 points ago

1300 vehicles. Since the Soviet military had over 55 thousand tanks, 70 thousand APC's, 24 thousand IFV's and around 4500 helicopters I don't think it did a big dent.

[–]louisrod2005 1 point2 points ago

Spawn kill spree.

[–]858FRESH 1 point2 points ago

I visited Chernobyl and Pripyat through a tourist agency last summer when I went backpacking through Asia and Europe. It was incredible to see all the abandoned buildings and the millions of dollars worth of equipment that were rendered useless because of their exposure to the radiation. Mad props goes out to those liquidators who put that sarcophagus on the broken reactor, without them alot of Europe could be looking just like Pripyat and Chernobyl.

[–]BHannify 1 point2 points ago

God I love STALKER.

[–]moose_sex 1 point2 points ago

Russians are notorious for having fields of random vehicles.

During communism, the government mandated that productivity remain at a consistent level regardless of demand...so if items such as cars weren't in demand...they'd finish a car to completion and park it in a lot somewhere to decompose. They'd have miles and miles of cars, trucks, whatever.

China didn't take notes, and they're doing the same thing: Most of those huge skyscrapers you hear about them building have super-high vacancy rates.

tl;dr -- communism makes you build a bunch of shit you don't need

[–]Gr3atdane 1 point2 points ago

I still don't think people realise what a disaster Chernobyl was. If it had happened in the US, i still think there would be political fallout from it to this day, it just doesnt get as much media attention because of where it happened. (and to some extent the USSR covering it up). The whole event it still chilling.

[–]mdguy429 1 point2 points ago

About once a week, there's a post that sends me down a rabbit hole, reading everything I can about something, and looking up YouTube videos (especially news broadcasts). This is that post this week

[–]OsamaBinHitler 1 point2 points ago

This reminds me of that one mission from the first Call of Duty: Modern Warfare.

[–]4chans_for_pussies 1 point2 points ago

Bitch, please. I played COD 4, I know all about the Chernobyl disaster. Yeah'hah.