this post was submitted on
1,250 points (57% like it)
4,701 up votes 3,451 down votes

funny

subscribe2,365,549 readers

10,630 users here now

PLEASE, No posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.


Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress.

  • Rage comics - Go to /fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 249

[–]publius4 288 points289 points ago

Seat belts are actually pretty useful during extreme turbulence and bumpy landings. I don't think they're intended for being useful during crashes.

[–]Maxables 185 points186 points ago

They are intended to be useful during crashes. It wouldn't do well to have a dozen human bodies flying around the cabin during a crash landing. They're meant to prevent injury to yourself and others, by constraining you during a crash.

People think of a plane crash, and imagine the cartoony plummet straight in to the earth, but most crashes are not nearly as catastrophic.

I don't mean to take this too seriously, but do please wear your safety belt when aboard an aircraft.

[–]Toyotaobsession 38 points39 points ago

http://www.ewatravel.com/odds.htm

The overall odds are better than 50% I think over land they climb closer to 75%.

Just like you said a plane crash is likely a somewhat controlled one.

You're more likey to get hurt/die if at the first impact you start flying around like a rag doll instead of being planted in one spot.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]wilkeson 15 points16 points ago

well, for starters, the airlines aren't paying those people anything, the insurance companies they employ are.

and there is no way that an insurance company would be able to convince the airline industry to manufacture planes and set policies that would result in death over injury. whistle-blowers aside, they fly just as much as anybody, it'd be like someone who drives a car trying to get the auto industry to make cars more combustible upon impact.

the insurance company might prefer it from a financial standpoint, but they certainly aren't doing anything to encourage it.

[–]Lippo 1 point2 points ago

Interesting fact: each fatality causes the aviation industry $4million.

[–]critropolitan 0 points1 point ago

Despite being a far safer form of transportation than cars - every airline fatality shakes public confidence in flying (people just don't understand the mechanics of flying enough on average to feel safe about it). The cost differential between paying a quadriplegic burn victim for injuries, treatment, pain and suffering, vs. a wrongful death payout, is almost sure to be less than the lost business risk of shaken consumer confidence in airline safety...and the fact is that fatalities always make a bigger media impact than even severe injuries...

[–]Maxables 0 points1 point ago

I can't imagine a plane full of dead passengers is good for an airline's image.

[–]mismetti 9 points10 points ago

I wear it even after landing. People that don't do this probably never seen this little video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0au9CE71vk

[–]el_guapo_taco 23 points24 points ago

I've never seen that video, but I have seen a jackass tumble painfully down the aisle when the ground controller gave an emergency stop flag to the pilot while we were taxiing. He just couldn't wait to unbuckle and start collecting his things.

People, seriously, where the fuck do you think you're going? Calm the absolute fuck down.

I quote a flight attendant here: "This is a little know fact, but no passenger has ever made it to the gate before the plane does. So please remain patient, and seated with your seatbelts fastened."

[–]mismetti 4 points5 points ago

Exactly!! I don't know WHY people rush so much to unbuckle and start opening the overhead compartments to grab their stuff and...

WAIT.

[–]kingoftown 1 point2 points ago

I had a reason once. I got seated last...and the only compartment for my carry-on was about 8 rows behind me. I tried so hard to be the first one up so I could get 8 rows back...but a lot of people decided they had to stand up in the aisle right away. I wanted to dick punch them all! (Yes, even the women)

[–]LocheAndLoad 5 points6 points ago

My dad is a pilot and knew a guy was doing this. He wanted to kindly remind him the importance of keeping his seat belt on so he slammed on the brakes without warning. I think the guy stayed in his seat until the gate after that.

[–]mambrino 1 point2 points ago

The structural integrity of the aircraft is incredible. The small plane, instead of being ripped apart, just bounces. It weights 19 tons!

[–]mismetti 0 points1 point ago

I hadn't thought of that, but you're right. It's really incredible. It bounces as if it was made of styrofoam!

[–]Agnostoman 0 points1 point ago

That video is at 2x speed. Watch the speed of the red beacon.

[–]mismetti 0 points1 point ago

Even so, I wouldn't want to experience that without a seatbelt.

[–]Playground_Legend 0 points1 point ago

I'm not sure about air plane crashes, but in car crashes a seat belt that just goes across the waist has a very high chance to break your back if there's a crash. That's why the seat belt across the chest is the only kind in most of today's cars.

[–]Maxables 2 points3 points ago

The extreme deceleration found in many car crashes usually isn't present in airplane crashes.

[–]Playground_Legend 0 points1 point ago

... really? How come?

[–]Maxables 1 point2 points ago

Well, I should say... When that type of deceleration is present in a plane crash, everybody dies.

Most plane crashes are crash landings, which usually involve landing without gear, and sliding alone a runway.

If a plane runs in to a building, or cliff, or any other large object, it will likely destroy itself. Haha most aircraft aren't designed with crumple zones, so...

[–]racergr 1 point2 points ago

The aircraft itself is a big crumple zone ... for those sitting on the back at least:)

[–]triarii3 0 points1 point ago

i'd hate to be that guy in the bathroom stall when a plane is crash landing ......SHITS EVERYWHERE

[–]BCMM 8 points9 points ago

I would think that anybody who has flown would know that they occasionally tell you to fasten your seatbelt for turbulence in the middle of the flight. The occasional person who decides to ignore it bounces off the ceiling under negative Gs and lands on another passenger.

EDIT: Edited wrong post.

[–]foreverburning 0 points1 point ago

That's how Billy Mays died.

[–]panlane 7 points8 points ago

I'd actually like more of a belt, perhaps a retractable shoulder harness portion. Just strapping the waist feels like I'm either going to bludgeon myself on the seat in front or garrote my guts.

[–]Skitrel 5 points6 points ago

Survival rates in fatal crashes are between 20 and 35%. That gives you at least a legitimate chance of surviving. Don't lower that chance by not wearing a seatbelt and impaling your face into the chair in front of you.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

They keep you in your seat. Would you rather have a bruise around your waste, or have your body ejected from the aircraft? That's assuming that the 500mph fireball didn't obliterate you first.

[–]twoclose 0 points1 point ago

came here to say this. if there are rapid changes in altitude you could hit the ceiling without it on!

[–]brp 1 point2 points ago

They're useful for search and rescue to identify the bodies.

[–]macogle 33 points34 points ago

Nail clippers are allowed in both checked and carry-on luggage. So are knitting needles, nail files and corkscrews.

Source: The TSA.

[–]redworm 20 points21 points ago

Yeah, now. There was on incident where during a military flight on commercial air one of the guys wasn't allowed on the plane with his nail clippers.

Despite the fact that he had an M16 slung over his shoulder.

[–]redworm 0 points1 point ago

you are one of my favorite novelties

[–]suddenly_ponies 2 points3 points ago

I'm happy to hear it... Some people really hate me.

[–]Flying_Assassin 1 point2 points ago

I love you.

[–]suddenly_ponies 2 points3 points ago

[–]Flying_Assassin 2 points3 points ago

[–]redworm 0 points1 point ago

[–]suddenly_ponies 0 points1 point ago

[–]Evian_Drinker 24 points25 points ago

Someone should go and tell the TSA agents this.

[–]dclowd9901 1 point2 points ago

That explains why I've always been successful at sneaking them through.

My guess is they weren't allowed at some point, then they realized how many were getting through and decided they were.

[–]The_MAZZTer 3 points4 points ago

Did you hear about the old lady who was detained for trying to carry on knitting needles? They were afraid she was going to knit an Afghan.

[–]short_stack 1 point2 points ago

Except the corkscrews with the tiny knife on them. Had mine confiscated last year :(

[–]VanFailin 2 points3 points ago

Seriously? "EVERYBODY STAND BACK OR THE FOIL AROUND THE NECK OF THIS CHAMPAGNE BOTTLE GETS IT! But slowly, because these fucking things aren't all that sharp..."

[–]fringeagent 1 point2 points ago

A few years ago, my pencil sharpener was taken just because of the blade in it. TSA agents do whatever they want, doesn't matter what the official rules are.

[–]DirtPile 0 points1 point ago

My clippers and nail file were confiscated just last week at security.

[–]foreverburning 2 points3 points ago

Which is why I've started to carry a print out of the TSA rules in my carry on. They tried to take my jewelry. My loose earrings, my tweezers, whatever.

My dad carries distilled water when he flies, for his CPAP. Surprisingly, this is actually well within the allowed items, as long as he has a doctors note. He always runs in to trouble, so he's taken to carrying a print-out. When we flew to Vancouver, CA a few years ago, the agent was saying "you can't have this" and my dad showed him the documentation (printed that morning) saying he could. The agent kept saying 'I don't care what the rules say, you can't bring it on board. Can't you just buy more when you get there?" Sure, but I shouldn't have to. I can also buy more clothes and prescription meds when I get to my destination, but that would be absurd.

They eventually relented (it was 6am and I think the dude was just grouchy) but not after a good 10 minutes of arguing.

tl;dr TSA tries to say "I don't care what our own rules say, you can't bring that clearly allowable item on board".

Edit to clarify outcome.

[–]DirtPile 0 points1 point ago

I'll start doing this. Thanks. :)

[–]foreverburning 0 points1 point ago

You're welcome! Many, many agents are simply unaware, especially if recent changes have occurred, or if there is a subtle difference in allowed and illegal items. I try to just present the list wordlessly, or "play dumb" so they don't feel threatened (they tend to be duller, easily aggravated types, let's be honest).

[–]TheTVDB 17 points18 points ago

Over 90% of airplane crashes have survivors. Most fatalities are due to fire and smoke inhalation after the crash. Without seatbelts, trauma from impact would likely be the predominant cause of death.

[–]hans1193 2 points3 points ago

Additionally, seat belts will prevent injuries in cases of extreme turbulence where a crash does not occur.

[–]Fuzzyshakes 1 point2 points ago

Got a source for this?

[–]SociableIntrovert 0 points1 point ago

It was posted on reddit somewhere a while ago, but the statistics include minor fender benders that occur on the runway and small stuff like that.

[–]ryumast3r 77 points78 points ago

Electronic devices: Don't need to turn them off so much due to interference, but more for a lack of distraction during take-off and landing.

Seat-belts: Not useful during a crash but good during take-off/landing (see below for this and electronics for why) and during rough turbulence/etc.

Reason for take-offs/landings: The 15 minutes before landing and after take-off are generally the most dangerous. Having distracted passengers while you might want to give them complex instructions or have to move them quickly makes it hard to do evacuation procedures. Having passengers move around the airplane also shifts weight which could cause problems.

As for the knives/water/etc? That's just bullshit and I have huge problems with TSA for things like this.

Just recently I was going on a trip from St. Thomas to Atlanta (connected elsewhere), and this lady had a rock in her carry-on bag. It was a nice rock with some cool imprints on it (didn't get a good look but it could have been coral of some kind). Anyway, the TSA agent looks at this lady (who's like 60, btw) and says "You can't take this on the plane, you know, I could kill like 4 people with this rock." Oh, so being able to kill 4 people is now a qualifier for not allowing people on a plane? Well, I have a blackbelt and could probably kill a few people too. Not to mention wrestlers, professional fighters, army personnel, big guys, etc. The TSA later went on to let her onto the airplane with the rock, but kept harassing her all through security and even afterwards a little bit while she was walking to the plane.

It was just ridiculous.

[–]drunkenbozo 33 points34 points ago

With the first one: what's to stop people from closing their eyes and having a nap or reading the many magazines presented in front of them? Anything can be a distraction. Electronic devices aren't a special distraction.

[–]dalore 17 points18 points ago

Babies are a distraction, we should ban them too.

[–]AwfulNameFtw 2 points3 points ago

I know you are being sarcastic but i would give all my business to a airline company if they banned all lap-children and made kids under 10 take an oath and then ban them if they break it. Tired of the little shits.

[–]dalore 2 points3 points ago

Adult only airlines could be a unique selling point. What premium would you pay to know everyone must be 18/21+? Imagine the fun/shenanigans that could be had :)

[–]drunkenbozo 1 point2 points ago

Put them in the overhead compartments just to be safe.

[–]Airazz 4 points5 points ago

Another issue is that you don't want tablets, phones and laptops flying around the cabin in case of serious turbulence or a crash landing short after the take-off.

Mind you, most crash landings are like this one, rather than "Piano falls from the sky" scenarios.

[–]dmmagic 25 points26 points ago

But hardcover books are perfectly acceptable.

[–]Airazz 3 points4 points ago

They shouldn't be, logically.

[–]drunkenbozo 8 points9 points ago

There's all sorts of other things that could possibly be flying around the cabin during turbulence or a crash landing. Sure, I get laptops and tablet, but phones are small and turbulence of such magnitude that they actually become a hazard to others wouldn't just occur during take-off and landing. At many points during a flight you have stewards carting around snacks, working away in their little kitchen things, and people walking about. At any time you could have people on laptops and phones, their shoes could be off or someone might be getting something from their luggage in the overhead compartment. AND, at any time, severe turbulence can occur or the plane could begin to fall (for whatever reason). Isolating small electronics during take-off and landing is essentially pointless.

[–]alskdjf2 0 points1 point ago

Think about this more in a statistical way. Banning electronics does three things at once: it makes people remove their headphones (which can become an issue if you suddenly have to evacuate - worse hearing if no PA and obstruction), it gets rid off heavier things that could be thrown across the cabin (better a magazine being thrown around than a laptop!) and it forces people to turn off devices that could cause interference (unlikely but not inconceivable).

[–]drunkenbozo 1 point2 points ago

Planes aren't affected by interference from on-board electronics such as phones and mp3 players.

I can understand laptops being a hazard (maybe: what about mid-flight turbulence? Should laptops be banned altogether then?), and people wearing headphones would be alerted by the sight of people getting up and leaving if the need to evacuate suddenly arose.

Frankly, these just aren't strong arguments to be made against using electronics during take-off and landing.

[–]Airazz -1 points0 points ago

AND, at any time, severe turbulence can occur or the plane could begin to fall (for whatever reason).

No, that's just wrong. Every single plane is equipped with its own weather radar (it's under the plastic nose cone) and they also get info from the flight control who have access to all the satellites and shit. If turbulence (a storm or whatever else it could be) is approaching, then the stewards will put the carts back in place and the pilot will turn on the "Fasten seatbelts" lights.

Also, planes don't just "fall". As I already said, forget the cartoons. A jet airplane is not a piano.

[–]alskdjf2 5 points6 points ago

While you are correct for the vast majority of cases, airplanes can indeed suddenly plunge quite far due to slight changes in the atmosphere ahead. Turbulences can generally be detected but not always with certainty. While extremely rare, people have been severely injured and died because of both things I mentioned.

[–]Airazz 1 point2 points ago

Yes, the system is not perfect. However, in most cases it makes perfect sense.

Oh, and the bit with nail clippers is a myth, someone posted that long time ago as a joke. I have nail clippers in my hand luggage all the time, no one has ever said anything about them.

[–]el_guapo_taco 0 points1 point ago

Depends on the specific agent/airport/ if they feel like being a pain, in my opinion. I've flown 4 times a month for the last 3 years, and have had them taken away from me once or twice. But then, conversely, I've forgotten 8" screwdrivers in my bag and still been able to keep them. So who knows how the system works.

[–]drunkenbozo 0 points1 point ago

Sorry lol, didn't mean fall as in drop out of the sky. How about "lose altitude very quickly"?

[–]drunkenbozo 0 points1 point ago

Ok so stewards put everything away during turbulence. People aren't, however, instructed to put away phones or mp3 players during turbulence. What makes take-off and landing significant?

[–]Airazz 2 points3 points ago

Take-off and landing are most complicated parts of the flight, where most of the accidents happen.

During the flight people are actually sometimes asked to put away laptops, but phones and mp3 players in this case don't matter that much, as they are light and small. Meanwhile, a flying laptop could leave a big hole in your skull.

[–]Flying_Assassin 0 points1 point ago

I'm sure you're grossly over-estimating that every single plane has a WX radar. Hell, not all planes have glass cockpits yet.

[–]Airazz 0 points1 point ago

Even if they didn't have a radar, they still would have weather data from the flight control center.

[–]Flying_Assassin 0 points1 point ago

I think you're grossly over-estimating that every plane has a WX radar.

Hell, not all large commercial planes have glass cockpits, which is astounding in this day and age.

[–]I_POTATO_PEOPLE 17 points18 points ago

Electronic devices [...] a lack of distraction during take-off and landing

They know I'm not the one driving, right?

[–]fuckbitchesgetmoney1 0 points1 point ago

The pilot will hear your angry birds in the cockpit and become distracted.

[–]shinwell_johnson 8 points9 points ago

The electronic devices thing drives me nuts - got a kindle? switch it off for takeoff (or rather just put it to sleep.) Inflight magazine - carry on, sir!

[–]MyCoolYoungHistory 8 points9 points ago

I just put it to sleep because fuck them.

[–]VanFailin 8 points9 points ago

I put my phone in airplane mode. It draws almost no power idle and doesn't transmit anything, and thus far I'm unaware of any plane crashes involving me.

[–]MyCoolYoungHistory 6 points7 points ago

Idk, I'm so busy these days that I tend to lose track of my aerial disasters. The same might be true for you.

[–]VanFailin 0 points1 point ago

I died, but I went to the circle of Hell where the debugger takes twice as long to start. Sometimes I'd rather be on fire, but I guess I should have been a banker in life.

[–]MyCoolYoungHistory 0 points1 point ago

Ah, that must be the "special hell" I hear so much about.

[–]brbegg 0 points1 point ago

[–]dclowd9901 0 points1 point ago

I have never switched anything off on a plane, not even put it in airplane mode; near as I can tell, it's literally done absolutely nothing.

[–]Dubzil 0 points1 point ago

That's definitely the worst of the worst... make me turn off my kindle for the first and last 10 mins of flight for absolutely no reason while the person next to me reads a hard cover book... makes no sense at all.

Anymore I just don't listen to them, continue to read, if they say turn it off, I just tell them it's my screensaver and that's as off as it goes. leave 1 headphone in w/ the ipod in my pocket.

The only one that makes any sense is airplane mode for your cell phone, they do this because as you're flying low, you jump from tower to tower and congest the network.

[–]HoboYellow 3 points4 points ago

Lucky it wasn't one of those 5 people killing rocks. Straight to Gitmo.

[–]ryumast3r 0 points1 point ago

Not to mention the 6-person killing rocks!

[–]Lmkt 2 points3 points ago

Electronic devices: Don't need to turn them off so much due to interference

Source?

[–]Oiiack 2 points3 points ago

To be fair, liquids can be mixed to create a chem-bomb. But I frown on the fact that they can't just let you prove it's water.

[–]ryumast3r 3 points4 points ago

Agreed. The funniest thing to me is, they let me carry rum in large bottles from the virgin isles to america, but not a 10oz water bottle from ATL to LA. The inconsistency kills me.

[–]Reedfrost 1 point2 points ago

What, just 4 people? I guess that makes sense. 3 people in your aisle and the chuck it up the cabin a ways? Just make sure you don't take off your seatbelt.

[–]ryumast3r 1 point2 points ago

The seatbelt is another 4 people.

[–]johnston9234 1 point2 points ago

As for the knives/water/etc? That's just bullshit and I have huge problems with TSA for things like this.

Liquid explosives

[–]BaconBrain 2 points3 points ago

Stop living in fear.

[–]johnston9234 1 point2 points ago

I am simply pointing out their reasoning. Honestly I dont think airport security is that big of a hassle.

[–]BaconBrain 0 points1 point ago

We all know their reasoning. And it is bullshit.

[–]KimboSpice 0 points1 point ago

Electronic Devices being put away could also be so you don't have 100 iPhones flying around the cabin during a rough takeoff or landing.

[–]pusangani 0 points1 point ago

This is where all other passengers should stand up for her, instead of remaining silent and hoping for the best, FUCK THE TSA

[–]betterpc 9 points10 points ago

Full size original decent quality pic http://i.imgur.com/zqhrT.jpg

[–]piverlunch 9 points10 points ago

And how bout them peanuts? Right...? Right...?

[–]zoomzoomla 19 points20 points ago

On the last flight I went on I got my belt buckle taken away from me because it was gun shaped. It was clearly a buckle, in no way could I have held up a plane with it. It was quite frustrating, I understand that people have to do their jobs and keep us safe but still...

[–]ak_ 78 points79 points ago

Are you sure it was TSA and not the fashion police?

[–]zoomzoomla 6 points7 points ago

Ha, it may not have been in the best possible taste but it was pretty awesome, a skull surrounded by two guns to be exact; and it was in the UK. Apparently they'd taken away a guy's t-shirt because it had a gun on it the last week. Although that really sounds crazy to me.

[–]Midasx 0 points1 point ago

[–]Frankeh 0 points1 point ago

That's ridiculous.

[–]Drawkcab_ma_I 38 points39 points ago

Have you ever heard of a rich terrorist? Maybe that is why knives are provided in first class only.

<\sarcasm>

[–]Adzmodean 20 points21 points ago

4 of the 911 Hijackers were in first class. So by that logic, they'd still be getting the proper knives.

[–]ObeseSnake 56 points57 points ago

There were nine hundred and eleven of them? Oh my!

[–]JoustingTimberflake 9 points10 points ago

Ah, the old reddit switch-a-fuckit.

[–]Banditosaur 0 points1 point ago

Ah, the old reddit switch-a-fuckit-roo

[–]BCMM 9 points10 points ago

Metal table knives are substantially harder to kill somebody with than plastic. Both are blunt, but one can easily be made sharp.

I cannot find a citation right now, but there was a study in which some medical doctors tried to sever vital blood vessels in the necks of dead pigs using various commonplace items. I believe that they succeeded with a snapped-off plastic table knife. Their recommendation was that the policy of trying to restrict potential weapons be abandoned and replaced with sanity.

EDIT: Found!

Commonly available items including a ball point pen, a plastic knife, a broken wine bottle, and a broken wine glass were used to inflict stab and incised wounds to the necks of 3 previously euthanized Large White pigs. With relative ease, these items could be inserted into the necks of the pigs next to the jugular veins and carotid arteries. Despite precautions against the carrying of metal objects such as knives and nail files on board domestic and international flights, objects are still available within aircraft cabins that could be used to inflict serious and potentially life-threatening injuries. If airport and aircraft security measures are to be consistently applied, then consideration should be given to removing items such as glass bottles and glass drinking vessels. However, given the results of a relatively uncomplicated modification of a plastic knife, it may not be possible to remove all dangerous objects from aircraft. Security systems may therefore need to focus on measures such as increased surveillance of passenger behavior, rather than on attempting to eliminate every object that may serve as a potential weapon.

[–]phil_ch 8 points9 points ago

You don't need to be rich to go first class as a terrorist, because it's the last time you'll be spending money anyways, so you can just throw it all out.

[–]Trobot087 10 points11 points ago

Step 1 - Get AmEx Gold Card

Step 2 - Max out that shit buying bombmaking supplies and 1st class tickets

Step 3 - ????

Step 4 - Mission successful, high five in Paradise as American infidel credit company gets all butthurt and demands more bailouts

[–]Tordek 8 points9 points ago

How is that sarcastic?

[–]despaxes 10 points11 points ago

Because the organizations have billions of dollars.....

[–]shygg 1 point2 points ago

no they all live in sheds out in the desert, no way they wouldn't actually be able to train a couple of pilots and send them on suicide miss....oh shit that allready happened

[–]ak_ 0 points1 point ago

Have you ever heard of a rich terrorist?

Yes, many times.

[–]FaerieStories[!] 5 points6 points ago

Seatbelts are for turbulence, not crashes.

[–]arahman81 0 points1 point ago

Also, people don't ant to see some idiot crack their neck at the roof by not wearing seatbelts.

[–]Cestdujamaisvu 5 points6 points ago

The moment I lost faith in airport security:

Last summer I tried to pass security in Heathrow with a 500ml bottle of coke that was about half full. Told by security guard I couldn't bring it through as it was around 200ml, which is more than the 100ml allowed.

Gf took bottle of coke from me, poured half of it in her empty water bottle and gave the bottle of coke back to me.

We were allowed to go through...

[–]DoctorNose 3 points4 points ago

The seat belt one is completely off base, but the others are amusing.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points ago

lufthansa gives ALL classes actual silverware. So i found out on my last flight. Also, why don't people ever question the fact that lighters are allowed on airplanes. THATS RIGHT FOLKS, water-no, tools which produce fire-sure.

[–]Soul_Rage 0 points1 point ago

I've flown with Lufthansa three times in the past few months and every time I just got the crappy plastic stuff.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Transatlantic?

[–]Soul_Rage 0 points1 point ago

Nah, just England to Germany.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

Hm, that's interesting then. Maybe you only get real utensils on the longer flights.

[–]Soul_Rage 1 point2 points ago

...so people flying to America are less likely to try to hijack the plane with cutlery? Really?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

I was flying from America to Europe, I guess they believe people escaping that wretched country aren't in the mood to murder anyone.

edit:i'm going to point out i'm half american, half german. I lived in the states for most of my life (nearly half of the states to be exact) so I believe in my mind that I have every right to called it wretched and not be judged for it.

[–]ruby_dog 0 points1 point ago

Lighters are not meant to be carried in suitcases because of the risk of them lighting during flight (bags moving around, pressure on the lighter, etc). It is much easier to contain fire in the cabin than in the hold.

[–]Worst_Lurker 0 points1 point ago

torch lighters- no

The reasons liquids aren't allowed is because the TSA doesn't have the time or the manpower to check every bottle that comes through to make sure it isn't lighter fluid or nitroglycerin

[–]lizardking99 3 points4 points ago

In my opinion, if you can overpower the whole flight crew with just a pair of nail-clippers, you deserve the plane. You clearly want it more than anyone else does!

[–]Darktidemage 4 points5 points ago

The seatbelt one is quite fucking stupid.

The seatbelt can very easily save you in a plane crash. Not all crashes are plummets from 30,000 feet straight down.

The plane doesn't even have to crash for the seat belt to save you. The plane can easily drop suddenly 100s of feet and you will break your neck on the ceiling.

[–]clark_bender_kent 2 points3 points ago

This isn't so much funny as sad.

[–]ChickenFarmer 2 points3 points ago

About the knives: You don't even need to book first class. In many airports there's a steak house after the security check, where you will be provided with a great steak knife!

[–]Piotr555 2 points3 points ago

That's nothing! On one of our flights going towards Afghanistan we have to fly commericial. TSA rules STILL APPLY as we are boarding a commercial aircraft with body armor and rifles. But we can't have liquids over a few ounces.

[–]hans1193 2 points3 points ago

Also, every airport now has nice sit down type restaurants that you can go to AFTER you've been through security, in which you can get full on steak knives with your meal.

[–]pantallica_51 12 points13 points ago

its funny how airports will even be dicks to people coming back from deployment. Like they will patdown soldiers.

[–]mower 23 points24 points ago

It's the TSA doing pat-downs. It's PEOPLE. If you ever see a building doing a pat down I need a photo of that.

[–]pedro3131 5 points6 points ago

Because it's not like people can buy uniforms and fake being soldiers.... Oh wait, it's soo common that even non terrorists use it http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2011/06/27/li-man-rock-diaz-busted-pretending-to-be-soldier-for-first-class-upgrade/

[–]ireland123 4 points5 points ago

If they pat-down everyone else, why would they not do it to soldiers?

[–]cheesesaurous 2 points3 points ago

You don't throw security out the window because of what someone is wearing. Also, how are they going through TSA if they are coming home from a deployment? Are you sure you're not referring to soldiers simply traveling in uniform while inside the US because their going directly to or from their station (like going home for the holidays from base)?

[–]Frankeh 2 points3 points ago

To be fair, my friend accidentally brought a live grenade back from deployment without anyone noticing.

[–]to_string_david 1 point2 points ago

my friend got screened in one of those machines that tests you for explosive material. alarms went off, he got locked in the machine, they clear the terminal. Then when TSA comes over, he's like, um of course i have been exposed to explosive material, i shoot guns.

[–]HoboYellow 2 points3 points ago

People coming back from deployment aren't going to go through TSA security...

[–]cefriano 0 points1 point ago

Well, it kinda makes sense that they don't want someone to be able to dress up in a military uniform and just waltz past security. They don't want to make it look like there's any way to reliably bypass security at an airport. At least, I assume that's the reason. Maybe they are just dicks.

Though like someone else mentioned, why would someone coming back from deployment have to go through security? They're not embarking in America, which is where the TSA is. You don't go through security when you get off a plane.

[–]spandeflex 4 points5 points ago

Oh, and by the way.. FUCK TSA!

[–]dexisajerk 7 points8 points ago

The water bottle thing is the stupidest rule. If 97 people are in line here, why would leaving my "bomb" in this trash can that they all stand next to prevent a horrible massacare that counldnt be traced back to be as I'm safely on my flight?

Also, my last flight (January) for work, I got offered a soda or tiny water bottle on my flight out. I wasn't thirsty, so I stuffed it in my back pack, which I had under my seat. 11 days later, I'm heading home, and airport security pulls me aside and asks to search my carryon. I say yes, like a boss. They pull out the tiny water bottle (same airline that gave it to me), and tossed it. I was speechless.

I honestly forgot I saved my water bottle on an inbound plane, and ended up being searched by the TSA trying to get back on the same airline that gave it to me.

[–]cheesesaurous 12 points13 points ago

They're not afraid the water bottle is a literal bomb itself, they are worried it's components for liquid explosive that you'll mix and then detonate on the plane. If it's in a water bottle in the trash can you're not going to be mixing it with the other components that you or your compatriots carry.

[–]LiathroidiDana 15 points16 points ago

Nobody is saying the water is a bomb. What they are saying is that, the bottle contains a liquid that could be an important chemical in creating an explosion. So if you don't have the chemical you can't do anything. Hence why they will allow mothers to carry on baby bottle with milk if they drink some of it themselves first. It annoys me that nobody can understand that nobody thinks your bottle is bloody bomb.

Also a bottle that the airline gave to you would be a perfect place to hold the liquid.

[–]cefriano 4 points5 points ago

I loved the SNL sketch where the TSA was training a bunch of new agents and they were explaining the liquids rule. Will Forte asks, "Now what's to stop me from taking my three ounces of liquids on the plane and then COMBINING my liquids with someone else's once I'm on the plane?" And they just kinda stared at him.

[–]Fireyedwindsurfer 1 point2 points ago

You can't detonate a bomb if you and the detonator are miles away from the explosive.

[–]halokon 8 points9 points ago

True...unless they use a mobile...or a timer... You get the drift.

[–]Fireyedwindsurfer 2 points3 points ago

The detonator would have to be in or on the bottle of water, though; someone would probably notice :P

[–]throatsplooshers 2 points3 points ago

You're giving them too much credit.

[–]ok_ill_shut_up 0 points1 point ago

Or near the bottle.

[–]BCMM 2 points3 points ago

What happens if you bring an opaque container? Remember, this is the bin for forbidden bottles.

[–]EllaL 3 points4 points ago

I just love that phrase. "The bin for forbidden bottles".

[–]I_POTATO_PEOPLE 1 point2 points ago

This wisdom brought you to you 80s action movies!

[–]cowpunter 0 points1 point ago

Easy fix: set one of the detonation conditions such that it goes off if it doesn't have a signal from detonator. As soon as you're out of range: BOOM!

[–]Apokalyps 0 points1 point ago

Don't get near possible terrorists with your genius ideas, kind sir.

[–]lineman91 1 point2 points ago

You can bring ice skates directly on a plane with you. Ice skates. the sharpened metal blades that have cut necks in the NHL. But, they're safe to take on planes!

[–]Urizen23 1 point2 points ago

I had the pleasure of going through the TSA pat-down for the first time last week; I opted for it just to see what all the fuss was about.

I had to wait 15 minutes before they could get someone to do the pat-down, and even when they got someone to do it the guy directing the line in front of the scanner told me to "go around" and get in line for the body scanner without indicating that there was a little gate next to the scanner that would allow me to pass without using it, so I got confused and a little agitated (and his repeating the same "move along, sir" line over and over didn't help things). The process itself took upwards of 15 minutes while they searched my bag and ran explosives tests on it (though in all fairness I had some geode bookends in my carry-on that probably looked pretty weird under the x-ray). The TSA says you have a choice about going through the body scanner and the little signs they put up along the snaking path to the checkpoint explaining their bleeding-heart concern for every single passenger's well-being/dignity and explaining that "you have a choice" are wonderful platitudes, but the alternative to the body scanners is so unpleasant and time consuming that the vast majority won't take it (and that's the point).

Canadian security, on the other hand, is just a matter of "put your shoes/jacket/metal objects/carry-ons on the conveyor belt, and step through the metal detector". I'm a dual-citizen and this Homeland Security BS has me done with America at this point.

[–]DoubleDown 0 points1 point ago

It's weird that JFK and Laguardia don't have that shit, but almost every other airport in the US do.

[–]userbelowisamonster 1 point2 points ago

I was in Minneapolis picking up a friend at the airport and I went to the glass case where they had on display a list of items that you can't bring on the plane.

My favorite was the chainsaw, because you could use the gasoline inside to start a fire on the plane.

[–]mebd 1 point2 points ago

TSA isn't about actually increasing safety, but making you feel safe. No one would think TSA was doing it's jobs unless they made your life a living hell at the airport.

[–]qwop88 1 point2 points ago

Nail clippers are allowed on airplanes so long as they don't have a blade attachment.

And you can just bring an empty bottle through security and fill it up from a fountain on the other side.

Also, these jokes are old as fuck.

[–]fat_stig 1 point2 points ago

A few years ago I went through Budapest airport and had my nail clippers that I'd forgotten to remove from my backpack confiscated on entry to the departure lounge. A fair cop I thought.

However, with no further checks before boarding, I had a pizza while I was waiting for my flight and was given one of these to eat it.

ಠ_ಠ

[–]YKWDPM 1 point2 points ago

Tweezers are also banned.

As Ed Byrne said: "Tweezers?! If you can hijack a plane with tweezers you deserve the fucking plane, as far as I'm concerned."

[–]critropolitan 0 points1 point ago

? I don't think so. Also I always take tweezers, fly frequently, and have never had TSA people say anything about them.

[–]YKWDPM 0 points1 point ago

I had them taken away from me once. Can't have nice eyebrows on a plane, apparently.

Maybe this was some years ago... I have lost track of time.

[–]mang87 1 point2 points ago

With all the things that people show up with that could be bombs or could used as weapons, the TSA guys would probably just panic and wave you through if you showed up with an AK47 and a stick of dynamite.

[–]srsimpson 1 point2 points ago

The rules for liquids get even dumber:

  • 15 oz. tube of toothpaste - NO GOOD!
  • Five 3 oz. tubes of toothpaste - OKAY!

[–]welp_that_happened 0 points1 point ago

Flying back from Incheon International (South Korea), I meticulously made sure I didn't have any of this crap with me in my carry-on.. to include liquids. Being slightly hungover, I made sure to buy a Vitamin Water before boarding my flight...

This is when I discover the assembly line of airport employees making us open our carry-ons. My (still factory sealed) Vitamin Water was, alas, revealed. I was told I could not take it on the plane. I told them I bought it in the terminal. I get "No liquid". I mentioned it was sealed. I get "No liquid". I open my mouth to protest some more but I get "No. No. No." Sensing that I was now being perceived as a loudmouthed and pompous American, I sadly surrendered my Hangover Juice and sulked to my seat, where I popped 4 Benadryl and knocked myself out for 14 hours.

[–]brp 0 points1 point ago

You find this for almost all flights going to the US... they have separate checks at the gate or even the jetway and they mostly just take away water. In manila, though, they did check my shoes as well.

Leaving bahrain sucked as I specifically asked the lounge whether they had a security check at the gate. They told me no... but of course I wound up chugging a bottle of water before boarding. Also, they asked me if my ethernet cable was longer than 3m.... apparently if its a certain length, I can't be let on board with it, like I am going to strangle someone....

Pisses me off everytime I come home.

[–]Mtw156 0 points1 point ago

Pretty sure the 'give you a knife and fork' bit is from Seinfeld's standup a long time ago. Still funny but sad. Somehow they install body scanners seemingly overnight yet the obvious, and known security issue with handing passengers a knife has never changed in 20+ years.

[–]Jrod121 0 points1 point ago

Lame!

[–]I_count_ducks 0 points1 point ago

Last time coing through Perth airport I had a jewellers screwdriver, with the metal bit all of three cm's long which I was obliged to throw away. Coming back home I realised that I also had a 30cm stainless steel ruler... No water but a crude oil sample was fine.

[–]susuhead 0 points1 point ago

My dad was on a Lufthansa flight a couple of years after this security madness began and was surprised to finally see metal cutlery back in service. So he asked the stewardess why they'd ditched the plastic.

Her response? "Sir, if someone can take over a plane with a plastic knife, they deserve it."

not_a_single_fuck.bmp

[–]panlane 0 points1 point ago

Serious question: if the cutlery is metal in firstclass then couldn't you bring an oilstone on board and tune the knife to a razor edge?

[–]Rudy69 0 points1 point ago

The forks are metal but they give you plastic knifes :/

(Well at least they did when I took the plane with Air Canada in December)

[–]Enjoi_BuD 0 points1 point ago

Some dude on an airplane asked me if I always kept my phone on. After I stuttered a nonsensical "sometimes", he proceded to berate me and told me the reason they do that is so when they are transporting hearts, or other organs for transplants it messes something up with regulating them. Or something like that. I did not know how to respond.

[–]vidfreak 0 points1 point ago

Apparently knitting needles are acceptable

[–]guyver_dio 0 points1 point ago

I once had a toy keychain cap gun on my keys once when going through an airport, and they came out holding the trigger saying who does this belong too. I said mine and he started to begin his lecture so I just interrupted and said dude it cost me like a dollar just chuck it if it's a problem.

But seriously, it didn't even have a hollow barrel. It was poorly painted and looked very toyish. It was basically a piece of metal that flicked up against another piece of metal. But because it was gun-ular shaped...

[–]fruitbat_anne 0 points1 point ago

I went through several airport securities yesterday coming from Bangkok, to a layover in Tokyo, back into the US. I realized halfway through my second flight (after having gone through two separate scan-security checkpoints in two countries, plus a physical search) that I had forgotten to remove a full lighter from my purse. I also had a bottle of essential oil in my purse (it was under 3oz, but I forgot it was there, and didn't put it in the plastic ziplock they say they require).

I don't think security really does anything to protect anyone, it just makes people (falsely) feel safer. Any semi-intelligent hijacker isn't going to bring things that can be picked up in security.

[–]GrandmastaD101 0 points1 point ago

I took a flight from Lafayette, Indiana to San Antonio, Texas. While going through security they stated gave you the usual speech about the long list of things you can't bring on the plane. Luckily we anticipated that so we only had to throw away lighters. After getting to our condo in Texas I opened my bag and found a box cutter in the front pocket that I used at my previous job. I completely forgot it was in there but I scared me a little because of how easy it was to bring a box cutter in my CARRY ON bag.

[–]random_digital 0 points1 point ago

Sigh...pre9/11, I was able to bring a 5th of Jack on the plane and drink it.

[–]icepenguin21 0 points1 point ago

You can bring water on, you just have to buy it once you pass through the security check point

Some bail clippers have that digging tool, THAT'S a scary weapon

[–]ribo 0 points1 point ago

The seatbelt will prevent you from being Alien Resurrection'd out a broken window.

[–]Tyranitar55 0 points1 point ago

You know a pop can is easily converted into a sharp edge which could cut a person easily use to take a hostage work your way to the cock pit threaten your hostage until they let you in and bam! 71 virgins

[–]toasterbot 0 points1 point ago

The seatbelt makes the difference between getting thrown from the plane at cruising altitude vs. popping your ears if part of the fuselage is ruptured. Plane crashes have a 98% survival rate, btw. I still find it funny that they make the pilots go through the same security as the rest of us.

[–]miianwilson 0 points1 point ago

I'm an airline pilot and they still make me go through security/take my shoes off, etc. I physically have the airplane controls in my hands... If I wanted to crash it I wouldn't need a shoe bomb. TheTSA is useless. The illusion of safety is all they provide.

[–]Shintasama 0 points1 point ago

I feel ya, I had to toss a sealed bottle of coke on my last flight, but they let me through with a 2lb block of poundcake wrapped in aluminum foil without even checking it.

[–]DarvelMk 0 points1 point ago

And here I thought that the purpose of the seat belt is to stop you from cracking your skull on the overhead compartment in case of severe turbulence.

[–]Thunderape 0 points1 point ago

I don't exactly understand the concern about not being allowed nail clippers on board anyway, or rocks for some matter (someone on here mentioned someone being denied a rock on-board). Why would you not just check in those? Why do you feel you need them on-board? And regarding the water, why not just buy water after you've got through the security? Or if you're concerned about the price, bring an empty bottle with you and fill it in a water fountain or in a bathroom (after security, obviously).

[–]Shelbz 0 points1 point ago

I flew from Denver to New Orleans a few weeks ago. They did not take my fingernail clippers that I had no idea were in my carry on until I got home, but they DID take my small bottle of anti frizz hair spray because it contained a small amount of alcohol. I got a beer on the flight. It tasted a lot better than hairspray, anyway.

[–]Ollari 0 points1 point ago

I feel ultra bad for laughing for the fact that I was the upvoter #911

haha.