this post was submitted on
2,027 points (51% like it)
36,761 up votes 34,734 down votes

funny

subscribe2,619,273 readers

11,886 users here now

Please take our newest poll about facebook posts

Reminder: Political posts are not permitted in /r/funny. Try /r/PoliticalHumor instead!

NEW! No gore or porn (including sexually graphic images). Other NSFW content must be tagged as such

Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress. Try /r/politicalhumor instead.

  • Rage comics - Go to /r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]Citizen_Lear 1260 points1261 points ago*

Spoon makers are indeed complicit in the ingestion of food.

[–]Landshark7 474 points475 points ago

I first read the sign the to say "spooks made me fat". Spoons makes a lot more sense.

[–]Revelry13 162 points163 points ago

Sadly I did the same thing.

[–]drkstr17 81 points82 points ago

We got another over here..

[–]Citizen_Lear 52 points53 points ago

Me four.

[–]RuffRhyno 39 points40 points ago

Me five.

[–]cizzop 30 points31 points ago

NO

[–]CameToThis 62 points63 points ago

Read "Spocks" over here, I know what you mean.

[–]ridger5 44 points45 points ago

The formatting is illogical

[–]friendlyhuman 574 points575 points ago

Spoons don't fatten people. People fatten people.

[–]mecrio 676 points677 points ago

I think what you're talking about is cannibalism.

[–]webby_mc_webberson 165 points166 points ago

Fat people make for a tastier person pâté.

[–]bluetux 100 points101 points ago

they go really well with a nice chianti

[–]amopelope 40 points41 points ago

I'll bring the fava beans! It's a party now

[–]stanknutz1985 2 points3 points ago

I don't want a large Farva. I WANT A GOD DAMN LITER OF COLA!

[–]SKURITYYYYY 95 points96 points ago

FAFSFSFSFS.

[–]CineSuppa 7 points8 points ago

I never thought anyone could write out that utterance... but... it all makes sense.

[–]oldsecondhand 45 points46 points ago

Soylent Green?

[–]phatbrasil 26 points27 points ago

Now with more cheerleaders!

[–]sleepygamer3 2 points3 points ago

Gramma was a cheerleader?

[–]Kensin 19 points20 points ago

Spoons don't fatten people but they do make it easier. People wouldn't eat ice cream as often if they had to get their hands dirty.

[–]richmomz 91 points92 points ago

Newsflash: NC bans union of spoons and forks; Obama declares sporks as reality of modern civic life.

[–]ProximaC 123 points124 points ago

FOX: Obama declares WAR on traditional utensils!

[–]Scruge 39 points40 points ago

Romney campaign: I'll take the credit for inventing sporks.

[–]thedude37 41 points42 points ago

Paul campaign: I was the first to warn of a spork bubble and the consequences when it burst, another example of crony capitalism!

[–]fleetber 32 points33 points ago

Gingrich campaign: I'll put an end to spork barrel spending!

[–]The_Dudes_Creedence 14 points15 points ago*

Perry Campaign: I'll eliminate three utensils immediately taking office. Forks, Spoons and... sorry forgot the third. Ladels maybe?

[–]Enigma3613 3 points4 points ago

Only after you loan him some money.

[–]Attatt 5 points6 points ago

Santorum Campaign: i am for spoons. Or, forks. Or, spoons. Wait, what are we talking about again?

[–]xolotl92 4 points5 points ago

Ron Paul campaign: look at us, we have been telling people about chop sticks and they just won't listen.

[–]zxcv73 6 points7 points ago

NBC: Obama finds new utensil that eliminates need for spoons and forks.

[–]TheAdAgency 5 points6 points ago

MSNBC: The unemployed, who will now hand feed you solving the unemployment problem and cutlery crisis of 2012.

[–]mike413 207 points208 points ago

Don't even joke about it. Pretty soon California will introduce legislation to prohibit ladles and tablespoons in favor of teaspoons. Then it will spread to the rest of the country...

Don't say I didn't warn you...

[–]Shinma 336 points337 points ago

California has been trying to get Sporks registered as "Assault Spoons" for years.

Civilians just shouldn't have access to that kind of powerful cutlery.

[–]knowses 69 points70 points ago

The spoon is only dangerous when it is loaded, especially when loaded with Hagendaas Chocolate chocolate chip.

[–]SlutBuster 62 points63 points ago

Rule #1: Treat every spoon as if it's loaded.

[–]TheAdAgency 30 points31 points ago

Never point a spoon at something you do not mind killing, or at least tasting a small sample of.

[–]BETAFrog 18 points19 points ago

There is no reason to have spoons with prongs other than to stab your soup!

[–]davelog 2 points3 points ago

SPOONCRIME

[–]chemistry_teacher 27 points28 points ago

Back to nature, I say! Eat with fingers.

Soup shouldn't even be cooked.

[–]Ali921 20 points21 points ago

For thousands of years our Asian friends have been "drinking" soup. Why not give that a try.

[–]chemistry_teacher 4 points5 points ago

bowls make me fat

[–]Dirty-DjAngo 2 points3 points ago

bowels make me fart

[–]Banaam 2 points3 points ago

When I was over there they had a type of ladle to "eat" soup with.

[–]noumuon 2 points3 points ago

most east asian places (probably everywhere asian) do, in fact, have spoons.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

You mean... people have been eating their soup with spoons?

I just palm that shit out of there.

[–]VirtualAnarchy 14 points15 points ago

But fork makers are the worst.

[–]thebluetoaster 3 points4 points ago

It's all big silverware's fault!

[–]mship 2 points3 points ago

We must create the chop stick diet.

[–]shutupjoey 2 points3 points ago

I was half the size I am now before they invented the spork!

[–]ArchangelOfFate 302 points303 points ago

Markers are accomplices of poorly made signs.

[–]red321red321 75 points76 points ago

reddit makes me procrastinate

[–]IRCZT 55 points56 points ago*

i will never, ever understand reddit's criteria for upvoting and downvoting comments.

edit: for clarification, he was downvoted at the time of my comment.

[–]red321red321 55 points56 points ago

seriously. if there's one thing i've learned in my short time here it's that a lot of redditors are morons.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points ago

Heh, I bet this guy don't mean me! I'll upvote!

[–]Flocito 7 points8 points ago

[–]SonicFlash01 890 points891 points ago

No one blames the dealership for drunk drivers

[–]Vee_Vee 790 points791 points ago

they blame bar tenders though...all the fucking time.

[–]nickburnin8 387 points388 points ago

As a former barkeep, sometimes it's legit to blame the bartender. It's pretty easy to know when to....they feel guilty about serving the drunk guy then watching him reach for his car keys.

It's not a bartender's job to stop you from driving away or of making an ass of yourself, but they should at least offer to call a cab for you, or cut you off.

[–]weasuL 261 points262 points ago

In most states they are legally required to cut you off. It is illegal to serve alcohol to someone who is already intoxicated.

[–]noobprodigy 201 points202 points ago

What qualifies you as intoxicated?

[–]HappyAssassin 519 points520 points ago

And there's where the line blurs

[–]Centrist_gun_nut 413 points414 points ago

If the line is blurry, you're drunk?

[–]you_all_annoy_me 24 points25 points ago

No, you just need to find your glasses

[–]hubilation 46 points47 points ago

Especially if you're the one who's intoxicated

[–]lalicat 50 points51 points ago

I live in NY. I never go out to drink, I'm a big guy - like 6'4 220 lbs. I went out to Buffalo Wild Wings with some friends and I was ordering double shot jack and coke. I had 3 in about an hour and the waitress just disappeared. I waited patiently for a good half hour with an empty drink before finally waving her down. She was avoiding me because you are only allowed to serve 4 shots an hour and she had already violated the policy and I would have to wait another 30 minutes before she could serve me another drink. I was only slightly buzzed (it takes a bit to get me drunk with my weight and a full stomach) but I didn't give her shit for it. I just made a mental note - don't go out drinking in NY any more. I'm not sure if its state policy (wouldn't surprise me) or just company policy, still we had a DD (poor guy is only 19) and he was just drinking coke. We were being very responsible. I think I should be able to get shitfaced if I want to as long as I'm not bothering anyone else. Guess I'm just used to drinkin' in Bahrain and Dubai where as long as you had money they'd keep em' comin' as fast as you could down them.

[–]Sekh765 41 points42 points ago

I think that is a Wild Wings policy. My friend had the same thing happen down here in Texas. The manager walked over and had to...fuck if I know, check to make sure he wasn't legally intoxicated or something before they would give him another drink. I was driving. He didn't even have keys on him.

[–]rspeed 17 points18 points ago

where as long as you had money they'd keep em' comin' as fast as you could down them

And as long as you're not a citizen, correct?

[–]lalicat 2 points3 points ago

In Dubai they are a little more strict in Bahrain you just have to say you are not a Muslim. I've been shitfaced with Saudis before in Bahrain they sure know how to party!

[–]Boy_Man_God_Shit 14 points15 points ago

exactly

[–]jeeluhh 16 points17 points ago

I have only seen one bartender cut off/refuse to serve someone, ever.

[–]Liar142 21 points22 points ago

I've worked in bars for years, and drank in them for longer than that. It happens all the time.

[–]Boy_Man_God_Shit 36 points37 points ago

Never been to a college town, eh?

[–]FightingPolish 80 points81 points ago

You sir have never been drinking with me then, not only have they refused to serve me on many many occasions, I've had them refuse to let me even enter the bar because my friends were trying the Weekend at Bernies thing trying to get me in the door. It doesn't work as well as it does in the movies. My motto was if one is good then twenty five is better.

Fortunately I quit drinking and haven't had a drop in about five years now.

[–]miksedene 132 points133 points ago

In the least insulting way possible, this post reminded me of an Onion article "Recovered Alcoholic Clearly Kind Of Proud Of Once Being An Alcoholic."

[–]Throtex 10 points11 points ago

Dram shop laws

[–]shitterplug 28 points29 points ago

It is, however, a somewhat moral obligation. When I was a bartender, I would notice someone getting a bit buzzed. Gave them two options, they would either give me their keys and promise to call a cab when they're done drinking, or be cut off. About 75% of them would agree, the other 25% would storm out, leaving me no tip. On a few occasions, I had drunks call the police on me for keeping their keys, after they drunk away their cab fare.

[–]nickburnin8 15 points16 points ago

That's exactly what I meant. Usually not a legal obligation, but definitely an ethical obligation (as in bartenders know better), and a moral obligation (as in people have a moral obligation to look out for eachother when possible).

Dealing with drunks is always unpredictable. I was bar-backing one night and had a chair hit me in the back. I slapped the guy with my bottle-opener and dropped him, at which point the bouncers flexicuffed him (legal in CA with a local permit) and waited for the cops to come. He tried to run away while cuffed, so they cuffed his ankles to his wrists and completed the hog-tie.

[–]RsonW 3 points4 points ago

...at which point the bouncers flexicuffed him (legal in CA with a local permit)

I love this State sometimes.

[–]nickburnin8 2 points3 points ago

Sadly...hogtying can be cited as criminal confinement. The bouncer had to be fired on the spot lest the bar catch any charges. We gave him all of the tips as a going-away present.

[–]Auvit 2 points3 points ago

What would the police do in that situation?

[–]shitterplug 4 points5 points ago

The few times it happened, the cops told the guy he could either leave the bar without his keys and pick them up in the morning, or spend a night in jail.

[–]noawesomenameneeded 12 points13 points ago

I blame the liquor companies. If those bottles weren't so easy to get into maybe bartenders wouldn't serve people so much. "Bottle's empty. You're cutoff cause I don't want to open another."

[–]dontlemmedown 180 points181 points ago

Or Best Buy for assisting dastardly hackers or pirates.

[–]InVultusSolis 257 points258 points ago

Like they'd have to. Anyone who buys a computer from Best Buy could never be considered a hacker.

[–]Gh0stw0lf 349 points350 points ago

Hackers would just download computers anyways

[–]VirtualAnarchy 139 points140 points ago

You wouldn't download a spoon.

[–]fondlemeLeroy 97 points98 points ago

That's only because my spoon is too big.

[–]SuiXi3D 6 points7 points ago

Is your anus bleeding as well, by chance?

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points ago

Well, I am a banana.

[–]ZorglubDK 2 points3 points ago

This guy got it.

"You're watching the "Family Learning Channel". And now, angry ticks fire out of my nipples."

[–]reidhershl 38 points39 points ago

and wear balaclava masks whenever they start hacking

[–]Era555 25 points26 points ago

[–]Atersed 33 points34 points ago

Is that a leather suit?

[–]Guyag 2 points3 points ago

Dashing.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points ago

I dunno, I'd bet a lot of "hacking" crimes are just teenage script kiddies using their parents' computer.

[–]KazOondo 24 points25 points ago

Buying a factory fresh "gaming computer" from Best Buy may have been the stupidest thing I've ever done.

[–]c92094 5 points6 points ago

I know that feel bro.

[–]7zark77 11 points12 points ago

Actually my dad bought a laptop from Best Buy and I hacked into his email account by opening up the Outlook application. Because, I'm, like, totally a hacker n stuff.

[–]BusinessCasualty 9 points10 points ago

Unless they're cleverly covering their tracks...

[–]Clovis69 10 points11 points ago

If they have the best price and are convenant, I'll buy from them.

A computer is a tool, like a socket wrench and the software are the different socket heads. Doesn't matter if you order the socket from Snap-On, bought it at Sears or picked it up a Walmart, it's still going to turn a bolt.

[–]axelsar 8 points9 points ago

Except lesser quality tools are terrible and will break with very little torque on them. .

[–]ignost 5 points6 points ago

"If they have the best price.."

That's why you wouldn't buy from BestBuy. I built a new desktop system last weekend for about $1200 that was similar to a $2,600 system they sold. (Re-used case, slightly faster CPU, didn't have a blu-ray player.)

And a computer is more like a car's engine than a wrench. Based on hundreds of factors, speed and stability differ wildly.

[–]u_suck_paterson 12 points13 points ago

or pirate bay for hosting links to copyright data but not the data itself. Oh wait.

[–]rgolem 10 points11 points ago

blame the apple store for douchebags

[–]JesusTapdancingChris 24 points25 points ago

And, just like that, Thank You For Smoking started replaying in my mind.
Actually, thinking about it - thanks, this movie is great!

[–]surfinfan21 6 points7 points ago

Yeah but the bartender who served the drunk driver can be held liable.

[–]EvilOne2654 7 points8 points ago

Oh hey! That's the gun store/shooting range I always go to!

Yay Shooter's Shop!

[–]trepanning 2 points3 points ago

Fuck yeah, Wisconsin!

[–]widarlein 213 points214 points ago

I have a question. I have gotten the impression that all of reddit loves guns. Am I wrong? And if I'm not, why is that?

(okay, that was actually two questions)

[–]otherworldsthanthese 69 points70 points ago

I think the majority of redditors are quick to jump to protect freedoms and not let any government impose restrictions of any kind (excluding those that protect others' freedom) on the people.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points ago

I think reddit wants to get high, steal games online, and get a boner at a shooting range. Reddit is the fox news of internet liberals (this coming from a liberal athiest)

[–]vgasmo 104 points105 points ago

It seems so.. Had a lot of discussion on this in the past. Jut gave up... I'm European..

[–]ComradeBoba 38 points39 points ago*

Mate it's just best you don't push the issue any further. You can make fun of the yanks politics and politicians, comment on their religion, or poke fun at their popular culture and they'll laugh and sometimes even understand your point of view. You'll never change their mind when it comes to guns though, it's fascinating.

edit: I should have mentioned that I am a pro-gun European

[–]mysheettz890 18 points19 points ago

Do many Europeans own guns? I don't mean to offend, but from the reactions of you guys it almost seems like you're afraid of them

[–]103020302 8 points9 points ago

Most of Europe will not allow you to own guns without special permits, mostly only shotguns. Owning a rifle is rare, and typically in rural areas.

[–]highsmith 10 points11 points ago

I would equate buying a gun in Europe to somewhat like buying a big Xray machine here. You have to go to school for it, you need a lawyer, special permits, liability insurance, the land you keep it on needs to be zoned properly. You need warning signs and redundant safety systems, but yeah one CAN be acquired. Oh and they're also afraid of pocket knives over there.

[–]derkrieger 3 points4 points ago

Most Europeans now a days dont have any experience with guns and how often do you see the news report a fun day of target shooting?

[–]whistlingwilly 5 points6 points ago

Of course were afraid of them, in the same way that Americans are and so go and buy there own gun to protect themselves. Well actually to be specific I'm not afraid of guns, I just wouldn't trust 80% of the population with a pair of scissors let alone a handgun.

[–]Khiva 21 points22 points ago

And the number of things that Americans have changed your mind about would be ....?

[–]JB_UK 13 points14 points ago*

The benefits of socialist healthcare?

But, to be serious, it's astonishing you could even ask that. It is impossible for someone to use reddit without being constantly persuaded one way or another by the people who are referenced or who comment on the site, most of whom are Americans. If you want examples, earlier today I read an American journalist reporting an American investment analyst, working for an American bank, and his opinion on the Eurozone crisis. Just now I read the article about Daniel Nocera's new research on artificial photosynthesis. When I read these articles, or the comments on them, I was not thinking "these Americans, how dare they have these opinions, and try to persuade me of them".

Even without sites like reddit, American influence is so pervasive that it is almost impossible to disentangle it from everything else. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing. An American is ultimately another human.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]soundslogical 184 points185 points ago

Yeah I get that impression too. Handguns are banned where I live, and I'm very happy about that fact.

US redditors seem to usually make the argument that a gun is just a tool, you should blame only the perpetrators of gun crime, not the widespread availability of guns.

But by that definition a nuclear weapon is a tool, and the US doesn't seem that keen on everyone having a universal right to those.

[–]Trumanator 241 points242 points ago

A huge factor in the US gaining its independence was the ownership of guns by the vast majority of residents. The theoretical ability of the citizenry to resist an oppressive government is part and parcel of American self-image. Self reliance is also a core American value, including self defense, which is why the right to bear arms is a fundamental right. Many Americans value the ability to be as well armed as any criminal might be, and not be helpless against them until the police show up. This is a real concern in rural areas, where it can take 30 minutes or longer to have any sort of law enforcement arrive.

As for nukes, that's a bit of a straw man argument. Its like comparing a flyswatter and DDT.

[–]SchwarzerRhobar 248 points249 points ago

Or like a gun and a spoon.

[–]rewster 4 points5 points ago

or a gun seller and an accomplice to murder

[–]Cheesewire 43 points44 points ago

ZING!

[–]dkokelley 47 points48 points ago

It's not a straw man. It's reductio ad absurdum. Then again, the same might be said of the spoons analogy.

[–]jedadkins 2 points3 points ago

yes but the spoon analogy is clearly a joke

[–]msterB 110 points111 points ago

Drugs are illegal and they are rampant. Making guns illegal does not get every gun off the street, it simply gives the criminals more % of said guns.

[–]Hug_It_Out[S] 159 points160 points ago

If you recently saw a submission of the same name, sorry for any confusion. I dun goofed and submitted an image that could be linked directly to Facebook. For anonymity's sake, I deleted that post and created this one instead. Oops.

[–]beesk 151 points152 points ago

fyi if you check my submission history I posted the image less than an hour after you, I think we may live in the same area. regardless I redirected everyone to this page so you can have the upvotes!

[–]xXSJADOo 46 points47 points ago

good guy redditor actually exists. ಠ_ಠ

[–]mwilso18 68 points69 points ago

CONSEQUENCES WILL NEVER BE THE SAME

[–]IMasturbateToMyself 51 points52 points ago

Dude, you dun goofed? Hopefully the cyber police won't tase you.

[–]200balloons 24 points25 points ago

[–]beaverfan 67 points68 points ago

Don't even get me started on sporks.

[–]stealthsock 62 points63 points ago

Sporks are the spoon's equivalent to an assault rifle.

[–]07040 7 points8 points ago

People do blame fast food and soda though

[–]bijida 43 points44 points ago

3 DAY WAITING PERIOD FOR SPOONS!!

[–]friendlyhuman 21 points22 points ago

Clearly you've never been to McDonald's at lunch time.

[–]uhbijnokm 12 points13 points ago

Background check for gym memberships?

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points ago

Is that the Shooters Shop in West Allis?

[–]NotActualIrony 4 points5 points ago

West Allis? Jesus, shit just got creepy.

Edit: Also, it doesn't surprise me that this would happen in the Dirty Stallis.

[–]psi_eric 8 points9 points ago

I was just about to ask that! Awesome little shop.

[–]feeverb 6 points7 points ago

I'm wondering the same thing.

[–]tman2k4 7 points8 points ago

Dammit, beat me to it. I'm 95% sure it's Shooters Shop on 84th.

[–]Radico87 488 points489 points ago

As an avid marksman (I refuse to hunt) and firearm owner, I'm okay with it being difficult to get access to firearms.

[–]Cryptan 42 points43 points ago

I'm curious as to why you refuse to hunt. And why did you choose "I refuse to hunt" instead of "I don't hunt". I have nothing against those who don't hunt so I am just curious. As a hunter myself, I'd rather kill my own food than buy it frozen in some shiny package knowing it probably didn't see sunlight or didn't move more than 100 feet it's entire life.

[–]farmthis 20 points21 points ago*

I find hunting one's own meat to be far, FAR more ethical that store-bought meat.

But I still don't like killing animals. I go hunting occasionally, but I'm not very good at it. I mostly enjoy shooting as a hobby. I also refuse to hunt ptarmigan now... and I don't know why -- because I don't really hunt for sport--I don't ENJOY stalking and killing... yet the total lack of sportsmanship involved in killing ptarmigan makes it even more distasteful somehow.

Trusting fat birds that you could step on... Can't bring myself to shoot those. When they're blinking at me from 3 feet away on the ground and making little hoots.

[–]IggySorcha 2 points3 points ago

If you can track it down, I once read an article in DeltaWaterfowl "Why do we hunt" by Holly Heyser. She was not a fan of hunting then one day decided to try it out bc her bf liked it, and found she became an avid hunter just for that reason-- the animal had a natural life and a fighting chance, and she earns her food and can guarantee none of it goes to waste.

[–]IonBeam2 5 points6 points ago

This, right here. I'm vegetarian, but I don't have a problem with people killing a deer quickly in its natural habitat.

[–]AnticScarab3 226 points227 points ago

I would agree; difficult, but not impossible.

[–]VirtualAnarchy 55 points56 points ago

I agree 100% with what you said. Every gun owner I've ever met is extremely responsible with where they keep it, and are well trained with how to use it.

[–]sulaymanf 83 points84 points ago

While that may be true in your case, there's a confirmation bias. Do you hang out with irresponsible people to begin with?

[–]Ziggerton 210 points211 points ago

That's a selection bias, not a confirmation bias.

[–]Trackpad94 29 points30 points ago

In fact, confirmation bias is a lot more relevant for the argument against gun ownership. One idiot with a gun is a lot more noteworthy than 100 responsible upstanding citizens with guns.

[–]Huggernaut 23 points24 points ago

That's not confirmation bias, that's a risk vs reward scenario.

[–]dbonham 52 points53 points ago

That's not confirmation bias, that's a space station

[–]the_kgb 9 points10 points ago

That's no moon...

[–]XcuseM3 6 points7 points ago

So what you're getting at is that irresponsible people are to blame and not the firearm?

[–]sulaymanf 2 points3 points ago

Yes

[–]VirtualAnarchy 2 points3 points ago

No, no, you misunderstand. It's already pretty difficult to legally own a firearm. There's a lot of precautions put in place and because of those precautions, the people I know that own a gun know how to use it and are responsible with it.

[–]InVultusSolis 86 points87 points ago

How would you make it more difficult? There are already rules that you have to be a certain age, can't be a convicted felon, or can't be mentally deficient. Also, remember that any additional government-mandated red tape will be subject to abuse and backlogging.

[–]digitalmofo 69 points70 points ago

It's already difficult. More difficult is not needed.

[–]n1eb 41 points42 points ago

As a competitive shooter (I'm okay with hunting) and collector, gun laws only make it harder for law abiding citizens to obtain them.

[–]bfudge 21 points22 points ago*

I know this will get buried in the pile of comments, but as a gun owner, I felt the desire to weigh in on a couple points.

1) I see a lot of people making the "why do you need automatic/assualt weapons?" argument. What people don't realize that often a semi-automatic/automatic/assault designation is often times arbitrary. A non-gun owner/or anti-gun person hears "automatic weapon" and assumes it's an uzi or an AK-47 spitting out hundreds of rounds a minute, when some laws and criteria for designating a gun as an "assault weapon" are if they having a removable clip with a capacity to carry 5 more rounds, which is actually extremely common trait in a hunting rifle. Or some states laws say a gun can't have a thumbhole stock or pistol grips, which when you're in the woods and trying to use one hand to move branches out of the way or reach for you binoculars, is extremely useful to have.

2) Just like the war on drugs has failed at curbing drug use, gun control doesn't curb gun violence. Do less people use crack or heroin because it's illegal? No. Same with guns. A person looking to use a gun for illegal purposes will find it illegally. If you are going to commit a violent crime with a gun, you aren't concerned with the legality of procuring or possessing it. YES--guns kill. YES-hard drugs kill. In fact, in 2009 there were 11,493 firearm homicides in the US. [Source] compared to 37,485 drug related deaths [Source] So what is more deadly? You can argue guns are engineered to kill, true. But hard drugs are too. Whether they kill or not depends on who wields them.

Most legal gun owners are responsible citizens and harmless to the rest of the public. Just like people who smoke weed pose absolutely no harm. Yet legal gun owners, like pot smokers, are often persecuted because they are lumped in with a criminal population in which they share a tangential relationship.

[–]mrbooze 5 points6 points ago

FALSE: The foods that made me fat required no utensils at all. (Hamburgers, burritos, fries, nachos, pizza, doughnuts...)

[–]MuttonTheChops 4 points5 points ago

These guys just need to Hug-it-out... amiright OP?

[–][deleted] 100 points101 points ago

Misusing a spoon won't make someone else fat.

[–]diaperedpupp 7 points8 points ago

You've never had someone put a heaping of food from one of those serving spoons on your plate.

[–]palookaboy 25 points26 points ago*

That still doesn't make it the spoon-maker's fault if the user gets fat.

EDIT: None of this changes the fact that gun manufacturers and license gun sellers operate their businesses under a reasonable assumption that the consumer is using the product in a legal, appropriate manner. If I buy a Louisville Slugger and use it to bash someone's face in, H&B isn't responsible for my decision to use it that way. If I use the sword I bought in China to stab somebody, the street peddler I bought it from isn't remotely complicit in my decision to do that. If a person buys a gun through legal means from a licensed seller, the seller doesn't share responsibility if the buyer uses it to commit a crime.

[–]rimo 2 points3 points ago

You do realize that guns are designed to harm people, and spoons are designed to feed people and spoons do not necessarily inflict harm when used?

[–]donrhummy 10 points11 points ago

What I don't understand is why so many people can clearly see that gun makers/sellers have nothing to do with the robbery a person commits using a gun, but no one seems to understand that the software makers/sellers/distributors equally have nothing to do with the illegal activities of the software users.

[–]TheAmityvillain 39 points40 points ago

ITT: Terrible analogies
Terrible analogies everywhere..

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points ago

food kills a hell of a lot more people a year than guns.

a hell of a lot.

[–]zBaer 5 points6 points ago

Those are you in England and worry about our gun laws you have to look to the revolutionary war.

To put it simply, outside governments, and ours, are less likely to mess with us if we are allowed to and have guns.

I think the founding fathers understood this.

[–]derpetteseducer 19 points20 points ago

I love guns. Its my hobby. But all in all this thread is good just for the debate and everything. Also if someone who has never shot a gun but has a chance, do it! Go to the range and have a blast. Nothing wrong with exercising your freedom.

[–]steamedgiraffe 2 points3 points ago

[–]2themanwiththeplan2 2 points3 points ago

OH MY GOD, I live right down the street from here. Gotta love it

[–]metroidz123 2 points3 points ago

lol, this shop is like a block from my house and I go shooting there almost every weekend, awesome place, awesome owner.

[–]soundtech 2 points3 points ago*

This gun store (the shooters shop) is only a block away from my house!

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

I read it as "spooks" and thought it was going to be a racist thread. I signed in and learned I was wrong. I'm glad I was wrong. I support the responsible ownership and use of firearms. Unfortunately, criminals and morons ruin it for everyone. Good for the shop owner.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]DoctorNose 23 points24 points ago

Fat people don't use spoons. He should have written shovels.

[–]Sonu9100 42 points43 points ago

Spoons are a gateway utensil to shovels.

[–]hellogoobly 73 points74 points ago

Wait a sec... I thought I unsubscribed from /r/guns

[–]colonbackslash 41 points42 points ago

And I unsubscribed from /r/kittens. Damned if my front page isn't full of the buggers.

[–]Darth_Hobbes 2 points3 points ago

RES blocks the word Cat and all synonyms for me.

[–]BipolarBear0 46 points47 points ago

We will follow you wherever you go.

[–]czhang706 28 points29 points ago

Honestly does stuff on /r/guns hit the frontage often enough for you to unsubscribe from /r/guns?

[–]CrashTestDumbass 5 points6 points ago

The frontpage uses relative upvotes. I get things from /r/techsupportgore on my front page all the time despite the all-time top voted submission only being 150 upvotes.

[–]Pyro627 2 points3 points ago

I'm pretty sure posts for your front page are picked based on the top posts in the subreddit it was posted in.

[–]aventari 13 points14 points ago

If we need to get rid of guns as their only purpose is to kill, then we need to get rid of Porsches and Corvettes as their only purpose is to go at extra-legal speeds.

[–]tlagj 5 points6 points ago

Oh no its on the front page!

Incoming liberal progressive politically correct reddit shitstorm

[–][deleted] 93 points94 points ago

how am i supposed to feel safe in my home without a missile launcher

[–][deleted] 87 points88 points ago

Fun Fact- You can't buy a missile launcher without many thousands of dollars and multiple government forms and extensive background checks. Exaggeration to make a joke leads to acceptance of it as fact.

[–]mtc65 24 points25 points ago

So you're saying that I can buy a missile launcher.

[–]Cdwollan 7 points8 points ago

Maybe, maybe not. Depends on local law and how much your CLEO likes you. Oh, then if the ATF caseworker is in a good mood or how they apply the law.

[–]xDividedByZer0 39 points40 points ago

Now that's what I call a FUN fact!