Meh, you can't put too much stock in the IMDB metric, methinks. It's based on voting, right? And TDK was a VERY popular movie. Most "serious" film critics would reverse the order of importance, I believe.

But you've touched on something that I've started to realize over the last few years, regarding the Oscars, the Grammys, "10-best-all-time" lists, and the like:

Ranking art is completely subjective, no matter the size or expertise of the population doing the ranking. Also: these rankings only have validity to those who believe that they matter. What I'm trying to say is that evaluating artistic media the same way we evaluate sports is a mistake; that "best" and "better than" when talking about art is a misguided approach.

Recently, r/music linked to Spin magazine's "100 best guitarists of all time" article - reddit comments roundly criticized Spin for including DJ Skrillex (who doesn't play guitar) and excluding obvious selections such as Jimi Hendrix and Jimmy Page. Personally, I LOVED Spin's take on the "100 best of all time" genre - and I think it was done firmly tongue in cheek. The "best guitarist of all time" is Thurston Moore and Lee Reynaldo together. (my take was, they don't really think that Moore and Reynaldo are the best guitarist EVER - they wanted to write an interesting, thought-provoking piece that sparked discussion, while poking a finger in the eye of "best ever" lists. And Sonic Youth DOES rock, IMO.)

Anyway, I've discounted the Oscars, the Grammys, IMDB rankings, and the like as "things that matter" in my life; you simply can't quantify art or the power that art has. Don't let it bother you; just remember that YOUR top 10 is more important and pertinent than any, ANY, "expert" or "popular" opinion. Your opinion is more interesting to talk about, and listen to, too.

TL;DR: Lists ranking art are subjective and worthless. Come up with your own heirarchy, and enjoy discussing/debating it. THAT's what it's all about - art is NOT sports.