this post was submitted on
1,564 points (58% like it)
5,524 up votes 3,960 down votes
shortlink:

gifs

unsubscribe288,397 readers

Links to amusing, interesting, or funny .gifs from the web! .gif format submissions only, please!

How to make your own animated gifs?

Please try not to repost and post reaction gifs in /r/reactiongifs.

Direct image links preferred! Avoid pages that have other extraneous material besides the gif like headers, banners, ads, etc. And please, no blogspam. URL-shorteners are NOT allowed!

Witty titles optional. nsfw when necessary; this implies the comments within will be too.

NUDITY GOES IN /r/nsfw_gifs

MARK SEXY GIFS AND SERIOUS INJURIES NSFW
FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL NOW BE REMOVED

a community for
to anything interesting: news article, blog entry, video, picture...
message the moderators

MODERATORS

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

1563
1564

Evolution (i.imgur.com)

submitted ago by kancas

all 176 comments
sorted by:
best
hot
new
controversial
top
old
best

[–]Elite_Jackalope 246 points247 points ago

I missed the part in history class where we became wizards. That seems like the best part, too.

[–]12_Baconed_Narwhals 55 points56 points ago

well, it was a very brief period of time. I don't blame you for missing it, I don't think my class even spent 20 minutes on it.

[–]WrethZ 10 points11 points ago

Yeah, hopefully we can reverse whatever it was that stopped the magic working so soon after discovering it and start using it again.

[–]djloreddit 5 points6 points ago

stupid science.

[–]wallawalla22 32 points33 points ago

Apparently right after that part there was a large population of what looks like hockey players?

[–]ohrllyowl 0 points1 point ago

Happy cake day! Have an upvote

[–]R3m3mb3rM3 2 points3 points ago

i thought all wizards and witches got burned

[–]IAmA_Zombie 1 point2 points ago

I guess thats what happened to them. I think the world would be more excepting of witch craft now.

[–]Manbrodude 0 points1 point ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpgQSbwnWD0

[–]AlsoknownasHD 1 point2 points ago

And I missed the part where we all became clones of Darth Vader

[–]malcs85 0 points1 point ago

you weren't supposed to see that bit.

[–]nalgasdehule 0 points1 point ago

I also saw thor in one part.

[–]orion846 398 points399 points ago

ya i saw WALL-E too

[–]mojomonkeyfish 98 points99 points ago

How is it that we become an awesome, spacefaraing race with super-smart AI, and we can't apparently do bariatric surgery anymore?

[–]Craighasdysentery 62 points63 points ago

Because in Wall-E, nobody cared that they were fat, or more likely, they didn't even notice or realize it was out of the norm. Everyone is fat, so why would they want surgery to make themselves look different from everyone else?

[–]Killfuck_Soulshitter 89 points90 points ago

Because health problems.

[–]draw_art 76 points77 points ago

Because can't see penis.

[–]Takuya-san 15 points16 points ago

Don't worry, you can have sex in a virtual reality where everyone is still fat but they have much bigger penises.

[–]IAmA_Zombie 10 points11 points ago

Screw cancer research! We need to get our top scientists on this technology!

[–]Epoh 9 points10 points ago

Who wants to live to 50 anyway

[–]Vocalities 11 points12 points ago*

Health problems? Shit, that doesn't stop people from eating Fourthmeals of who know how many "burritos", constantly, drinking 72oz sodas, staying up late stuffing their face with Pizza Rolls and Pizza Bagels and Hot Pockets of a certain "Italian" variety. People eat and live shitty because eh worry about it later when you're stuck in your shower.

[–]LifeFailure 7 points8 points ago

"You're" and thanks for making me hungry.

[–]CushtyJVftw 0 points1 point ago

If they're that advanced, surely they could overcome these.

[–]sneerpeer 1 point2 points ago

Because skinny is the new fat!

[–]LurkVoter 23 points24 points ago

step 1) Invent safe myostatin inhibition procedure

step 2) Make everyone look like Greek gods

step 3) Become billionaire

This is almost possible now and will certainly be possible in less than thirty years. These 'obese future' scenarios are stupid.

[–]harrisz2 9 points10 points ago

You had zero points but I dunno why. People forget that vanity is a much a part of our society as laziness. *I still liked the gif though.

[–]tubbylardman 10 points11 points ago

Exactly. Look at the film "Idiocracy". Instead of all the scientists focusing on real sciences, they focused on the cosmetic and similar industries.

[–]Legio_X 2 points3 points ago

The thing about "this will be possible in thirty years" is usually that people have been saying that about "X breakthrough" usually for much longer than 30 years.

"Yeah, nuclear fusion will be figured out, like, any day now!" 1950s

"Everyone in the year 2000 will fly around on hovercars and jetpacks!" 1960s

"The whole aging thing is totally going to be fixed!" 1990s

[–]mojomonkeyfish 2 points3 points ago

We walk around with constantly connected pocket computers that can retrieve mountains of information from electronic super-encyclopedias.

We can understand and treat many forms of cancer.

The only technologies from Star Trek we don't have or surpass are the ones that are pretty strictly fantasy (teleportation, faster than light travel, etc.).

In many ways, we beat the expectations of futurists every decade. The things we don't achieve are silly fantasies (like jetpacks, why would we want or need jetpacks).

[–]Legio_X 1 point2 points ago

The internet and smart phones are great, yeah.

Are they as good as nuclear fusion, or as the space flight technology that the 1960s futurists imagined we'd possess today? Of course not.

The futurists thought we'd have massive space stations and bases in the solar system by now. Of course nuclear fusion would have made this a lot easier.

In any case, our progress virtually is amazing. But in the real world, not so much. Our cities are mostly aged infrastructure from the 1970s, with a sprinkling of newer buildings.

What does it say about 21st century civilization that present day Rome is infinitely uglier than ancient Rome or Athens were at their height? The Pantheon and Parthenon lasted 2000 years, most of our asbestos laden infrastructure will likely be condemned in 20-30 at most.

[–]mojomonkeyfish 1 point2 points ago

a) We have that infrastructure from 40 years ago because it still works.

b) People don't live in the Parthenon. It's crumbling ruins. Our concrete structures will be crumbling ruins too, and for far longer.

We haven't failed in any respect. We have space stations. We've sent exploratory missions to Mars. Are we to be blamed because we found better / different ways of accomplishing the same goals?

For all we know, nuclear fusion as an energy source is speculative fantasy. We might as well beat ourselves up for not harnessing unicorn power.

[–]Legio_X 0 points1 point ago

The Pantheon, on the other hand, is not crumbling ruins. It is still the most spectacular structure in Rome, despite being built almost two millenia ago.

Chances are that 2000 years from now, the Parthenon will still be standing, and the rest of the crumbling modern day infrastructure of Rome will have disintegrated into dust centuries before.

Nuclear fusion is different from unicorn power because nuclear fusion is what powers the sun. It actually exists, and there are theoretical ways to harness it.

We have one space station, which is going nowhere because no one can find a reason to fund it, given how ridiculously expensive space travel is to us.

Exploratory missions to Mars hardly gain us more than just looking at it through the latest space telescopes and spectrometers.

I'm not saying we should "beat ourselves up." I'm saying that when people say "ooh, this miraculous scientific breakthrough of us all magically looking like Greek Gods is just 10 years away!" that those people have basically always been wrong.

And 10 years from now, they sure won't be admitting they were wrong, either. Then it will be "oh, but THIS time it's 10 years away!"

My whole point is that they are as wrong as the people who insisted we'd have nuclear fusion by 1970 were. We might NEVER have nuclear fusion, just as we might NEVER have this miraculous technology to stop aging or make us all look like Prometheus.

[–]mojomonkeyfish 1 point2 points ago

We'll come back to this in 30 years. If you're right, I owe you a drink.

[–]Legio_X 1 point2 points ago

And if you're right, I owe you a jetpack.

And if that other guy was right, we'll both look like Greek gods, apparently.

[–]Trooper170 1 point2 points ago

if not jetpacks, at the very least, a helicopter should be in every garage. I mean seriously. there are kits to build your own all over the internet, and you can buy a single seater for the price of compact car! http://www.prismz.com/helio/ lol few examples. helicopters = more gas efficient than jetpacks.

[–]mojomonkeyfish 1 point2 points ago

This is exactly my point. We have the technology, it just doesn't necessarily take the form that we though it would.

Tom Swift had an electric gun, we have a Taser. Not exactly the same idea, but the same effect.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Legio_X 4 points5 points ago

Oh, not more evil oil corporation conspiracy theories.

What do you think companies like Shell and Exxon spend billions on research and development for??

It's incredibly obvious; so that THEY are the first ones to pioneer any new energy technology and can patent and hopefully monopolize the benefits.

Corporations aren't stupid. They realize at some point newer, more effective technologies, like fusion , will be discovered.

They spend billions to try to ensure that when the new technology is found, they will benefit, not their competitors.

The idea that evil corporate conspiracies are holding back humanity is so incredibly stupid it is an insult to the intelligence of anyone foolish enough to assert such claims.

[–]mojomonkeyfish 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, this is basically what I was going for. If obesity becomes the number one killer, then people will care about it, and they will develop technologies to combat it.

That's why we're spending tons of resources on cancer: it's what kills people.

And, we've made tremendous progress in that field. We have advanced detection, prevention, and treatment options. We're now treating cancer on the level of molecular pathways, targeted to the genetics of the cancer and the host.

Obesity is a far simpler beast.

[–]hiyhello 2 points3 points ago

Don't worry, we'll eventually realize we want to go back to Earth and go back to waddling.

[–]MoarVespenegas 0 points1 point ago

Also why can't people realize that you can live a sedentary lifestyle and not get fat? Seeing as how large the world population is getting that might be easier in the future than before.

[–]mojomonkeyfish -2 points-1 points ago

A lot of people talk a lot of shit about fat people, and then they enter midlife, and suddenly their adolescent hormone fueled metabolism slows down, and is replaced with work-related stress hormones that cause you to store fat.

It's just like the obnoxious teens who always talk about "never getting sick". a) They do, they just selectively choose not to remember it. b) You will get sick more and recover more slowly as you become an adult.

[–]thecrimedonkey 12 points13 points ago

I was thinking the end was more Vladimir Harkonnen

[–]Killfuck_Soulshitter 5 points6 points ago

They raped a Bene Gesserit and then were infected with an "I make you fat" disease that the BG intentionally released from their vagina of viral warfare?

[–]Reiver79 1 point2 points ago

The "Singularity" will prevent the possibility of a "Wall-E" situation from happening... I hope.

[–]Thyson234 57 points58 points ago

As long as there is the existence of sex, this will never happen

[–]datn 30 points31 points ago

To that I say, sadly, "teledildonics".

[–]cdcox 6 points7 points ago

I suspect such a machine will never be built, not because of technical impossibility, but because of the very nature of such a machine.

Basically, anyone horny enough to make a perfect sex machine will never stop using it long enough to commercialize this product or to build a stable version for public consumption. (As sex would likely be a prime motivator for such an individual) It's possible this has already been invented many times but has died with it's creator each time.

[–]IAmA_Zombie 4 points5 points ago

I imagine someone finding the rotting corpse of their loved one strapped to what they assume is a bull riding machine.

[–]JayJayJokesterr 2 points3 points ago

Well if the machine were to directly stimulate the reward/dopamine system of the brain, then surely you'll never stop.

But it it's just jacking you off or having sex with you, you'll immediately lose interest after orgasm/ejaculation. I mean, can you jack off for hours? Ejaculate and just keep jacking off? Just ejaculation after ejaculation. Jesus. That's too much ejaculation.

[–]datn 0 points1 point ago

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/mimssbits/27001/

[–]Legio_X 0 points1 point ago

Nah, sexual exhaustion, especially for men.

After the climax any man would make a patent and sell it.

Though he'd probably sell a very watered down, lame version of it so that he can keep scaling it up and selling new, better versions for decades.

[–]Epoh 0 points1 point ago

DING DING DING

[–]junkeee999 2 points3 points ago

It already is happening.

[–]Reiver79 0 points1 point ago

There could still be normal people and then there could be the others who just use technology to get around.

[–]LTALZ 34 points35 points ago

Someone put this in slow motion!

[–]MrCaffeine 69 points70 points ago

http://i.imgur.com/2AjKC.gif

[–]RespectedDucks 32 points33 points ago

God's work etc.

[–]gimme_my_fucks_back 1 point2 points ago

I see the answer now, the reddit drug does not provide the endorphins it used to. Level up, welcome to a new level of addiction.

[–]cereal_bawks 13 points14 points ago

At first I thought he slammed the stick into his balls. This made it much clearer. Thank you.

[–]LastImmortalMan 13 points14 points ago

Mother of god I didn't even know 80% of that stuff was IN the actual gif.

[–]MrCaffeine 9 points10 points ago

Yeah. It took me a couple looks even then to spot Vader.

[–]jojjo223 1 point2 points ago

Did I just see Darth Vader in there?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

I saw a fish man.

[–]TheHoneyBadger 0 points1 point ago

Did anybody else see Ronald McDonald? Or maybe I'm just hungry :(

[–]fhtagn 1 point2 points ago

seemed like one hippie. or Disco Stu.

[–]KojakMoment 7 points8 points ago

I love how he slows right down at the end. Kinda reminds me of this!

[–]JavaLSU 6 points7 points ago

Why does technology make him go bald?

[–]Taikunman 6 points7 points ago

I enjoy technology and I'm bald. Anecdotal evidence is still evidence!

[–]thecoffee 0 points1 point ago

The gif does not say how much time passes. Maybe hairless people will become more likely to reproduce in the future.

[–]TheJuniorControl 5 points6 points ago

More like, speculation?

[–]Ntopper 4 points5 points ago

I would like to think at the end we would transcend the "body." I think we will have a brief "fat"period, but would it last? would our knowledge and mastery of medicine and biology not make us move past this stage? Pretty inefficient to maintain a society of fat bodies in the information age.

[–]draw_art 4 points5 points ago

I think the microprocessors are gonna go in our brains so we can walk around and Google stuff by thinking it.

[–]zuperxtreme 2 points3 points ago

Exactly what I thought. During the last frames the "evolution" was simply the person getting fatter and not the computer integrating more with the person. Our bodies, while amazing machines, aren't without faults. We could do better without.

[–]Tobislu 5 points6 points ago

The reason this won't happen is that we'll eventually make machines that exercise our bodies for us.

[–]Metsa 2 points3 points ago

Or more simply a pill that blocks fat storage

[–]Tobislu 0 points1 point ago

Except being skinny isn't the only goal to exercise. They may invent one before the other, but both will happen.

[–]Grooth 23 points24 points ago

Ok I know those loungers from Wall-e are really hated on, but am I the only one who thinks that they're awesome?

[–]thecoffee 1 point2 points ago

Funny thing is, those people were not "fat". That form was bred into the population over 500 years of sedentary lifestyle and was bred 'out' during the timespan of the closing credits.

[–]jenesuispasbavard 6 points7 points ago

No.

[–]Nocut12 1 point2 points ago

Yeah, it never really read as a cautionary tale for me either.

[–]JonnyCams 2 points3 points ago

Towards the end, I thought, that's a really fat dude. Then I thought, maybe he's wearing a diaper and somebody needs to change it.

[–]Dancerocket 31 points32 points ago

That's not what evolution is.

[–]doubleyoshi 67 points68 points ago

There is more than one definition to evolution.

[–]Dancerocket 59 points60 points ago

I will accept that I was wrong and apologize for not thinking my comment fully through.

[–]doubleyoshi 52 points53 points ago

Did I accidentally wander into r/canada?

[–]Dancerocket 16 points17 points ago

Nope, evolution is change over time. So this is evolution. I was wrong so why try to argue about it?

[–]doubleyoshi 9 points10 points ago

And I respect you for it

[–]yusufmte 1 point2 points ago

sorry

[–]SignHere____________ -1 points0 points ago

dude that's velocity.

[–]wallawalla22 4 points5 points ago

Thats change in position over time.

[–]FuLLMeTaL604 0 points1 point ago

That's change in displacement over time in a specific direction.

[–]Phil_J_Fry 0 points1 point ago

I thought that was acceleration. Velocity is just displacement over time in a direction, right?

[–]FuLLMeTaL604 1 point2 points ago

Yeah you are right about velocity (by definition, velocity has to be in a direction since it is a vector quantity) and acceleration is change in velocity over time.

Physics 11 for the win.

[–]LastImmortalMan 0 points1 point ago

Mmm, Ill be the technicality cunt for the day:

Technically, if you disregard evolve coming from unfold, and look at 'evolution' specifically then it does only have one definition.

Evolution is purely a biological term, and when applied to abstract human concepts such as 'the evolution of the scientific method over hundreds of years has been staggering' or 'the fast paced evolution of modern sports is due to the diverse nature of competition in our populous world' it is technically incorrect. The term evolution should not be applied in a broad sense, but it has become a pretty common word to use in any sort of progression or Chronicle sense.

It is like the term 'concrescence' which was historically a dentistry term/physic term (describing two teeth fusing together, or the amassing of particles). Since the time of Terence McKenna the term has been more widely applied to the amalgamation of the human mind and consciousness, as well as broad statements in some industries.

[–]doubleyoshi 1 point2 points ago

Source?

[–]LastImmortalMan -1 points0 points ago

Heuristic knowledge here, I never went to post secondary or anything so I am not sure on the exact source. But I know it was a small debate in intellectual circles a while ago, it is more semantics than anything, and it was mostly a joke/troll (I did call myself a cunt :P).

I'll see if I can dig up a source, or get a science friend to back up the statement. To me it makes logical sense when you look at the historical use of the word. Like I said nowadays the word evolution is pretty standard and not actually wrong to use in almost any situation, I think the shift in the 'definition' of the word happened pretty early on in its life.

[–]doubleyoshi 2 points3 points ago

So would you say the definition of the word has evolved?

[–]LastImmortalMan -2 points-1 points ago

Annnd, that was the troll. Good sire you win my internet goldstar of the night. Boredom averted.

[–]Deracination 1 point2 points ago

Fuck you

[–]LastImmortalMan 1 point2 points ago

I think you are missing my point. Historically the world evolution was used exclusively by scientist... the root may be in the word 'evolve' but the true application of the word was meant to only describe biological functions. Early on in it's life the term shifted and became the term which we use today.

[–]Deracination 0 points1 point ago

Right. The definition of a word doesn't depend on its origins, it depends on what most people think it means.

[–]LastImmortalMan 0 points1 point ago

No doubt, but you must admit, we as a populous don't always make the best decisions, and it is semantics like this that sometimes can degrade our way of communicating (and thus directly change our ability to think freely and with precision).

Even if 5 billion people say 2 + 2 = 5, we won't change our definition of that. Will we? Orwell had it right in 1946!

[–]Deracination 1 point2 points ago

We won't because that's not a word.

[–]LastImmortalMan 0 points1 point ago

Haha, ohhhhhhhhhhhh brian.

[–]299314 0 points1 point ago

Evolution used to be a novel idea, it was a specific word for a specific theory. Once that theory became common knowledge, the word became well enough known that people could and did use it in a general sense. Nowhere did our language get dirty or less precise. If you say that something biological 'evolved', then it's incredibly obvious that you mean biological evolution.

Evolve really is a useful word to have. I suppose you could just use "progress" or "develop", but those don't really have the connotation of a natural invention, selection, and reproduction of many ideas. Like, "Languages evolve, whether you like it or not."

[–]LastImmortalMan 0 points1 point ago

Ahh, but that is where I argue the precision of language is faulting. You should not use a scientific term in the place of simpler language.

Languages evolve, whether you like it or not.

Is less precise than "Languages naturally progress, whether you like it or not"

Saying languages evolve leaves an pretty ambiguous message, to me it is the same as saying 'language changes'. Well why? Natural progression, artificial developmental... both give a better foundation of information while not being more complicated than the alternative.

[–]SpookyMelon 4 points5 points ago

OBJECTION! Although this may not be a good representation of the scientific theory of evolution, one definition is the gradual development of something, which this clearly resembles!

[–]leftabitcharlie 1 point2 points ago

You forgot your guitar solo.

[–]SpookyMelon 1 point2 points ago

Thank you sir. Will remember next time.

[–]CrunchBang 4 points5 points ago

Cultural evolution

[–]pinklikepinkman 0 points1 point ago

Evolution of tools.

[–]swimmer23 1 point2 points ago

It should have ended with the technology merging with man to the point where man completely disappears. Look up the transcension hypothesis.

[–]MyKneesAreCold 1 point2 points ago

Would anyone like to inform me on the process of making such an animation? I am completely unfamiliar with this, but it seems like a cool thing to pick up. Thanks!

[–]Metsa 0 points1 point ago

You could make it in Flash just making each frame a new picture. I'm sure there's a simpler way though

[–]anonymousHacker 1 point2 points ago

man... we were fat a lot through out history.

[–]TheModernEgg 1 point2 points ago

Booyah. I was looking for this. People's weight has always been different based on body type, diet, and excercise. In fact, being "overweight" by today's standards used to signify abundance of wealth, because for so long food was scarce to those who couldn't afford it. I understand the .gif if it signifies a greater percentage of fatness, but for real, humans have always been fat.

[–]Scenro 1 point2 points ago

So this is how planets are formed...

[–]cupofworms 1 point2 points ago

Took me 3 times watching to realize the first guy does not stab himself.

[–]mumbaitherogue 1 point2 points ago

Unrealistic. He spent all the time on the internet at the end and didn't move his hand to his dick at all..

[–]TheModernEgg 1 point2 points ago

This needs more attention. Funniest comment in the thread.

[–]safety_mouse 5 points6 points ago

I had the big bang theory theme tune playing in my head whilst watching this

[–]gresk0 -5 points-4 points ago

"YOU MENTIONED TBBT! DOWNVOTES!" - Reddit

[–]thefreq 0 points1 point ago

Except that didn't happen

[–]gresk0 3 points4 points ago

At the time of my comment, the post was +2/-4.

[–]jjchap4317 0 points1 point ago

I don't think this will ever happen because sports will always be awesome

[–]Metsa 0 points1 point ago

Games will become so advanced that you won't be able to tell the difference

[–]Wisdom_Bro 0 points1 point ago

Notice how at first we as a race we were doing things, and then we just watched everything.

[–]alwaysonline123 0 points1 point ago

yeah if you believe WALL-E

[–]metallicapanda 0 points1 point ago

start the .gif then open this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfbF44UeRBY

:)

[–]waffleninja 0 points1 point ago

I highly doubt it. We are on the verge of having weight loss drugs to prevent that from happening to anyone.

[–]upinflames 0 points1 point ago

I think in the future we'll easily have enough biotechnological advancement to keep us from becoming obese. People vastly underestimate how much biotech will effect the future of humanity.

[–]RiverSong3 0 points1 point ago

That end bit is slightly terrifying...

[–]benofrio 0 points1 point ago

Woah

[–]napalm098 0 points1 point ago

Did anyone else find it ironic that the cross turned into a sword?

[–]WeylandYutani42 0 points1 point ago

I'm ahead, I'm a man.

I'm the first mammal to wear pants.

[–]GroaningMonkey 0 points1 point ago

I loved the afro part. makes me smile :D

[–]SubtleMockery 0 points1 point ago

This is missing the crucial step where we just give up our feeble bodies and become the machine.

[–]bauhauso 0 points1 point ago

That "gif" is simply not true.

[–]Shazumi 0 points1 point ago

im guessing we are at the point before the guy becomes a fat fuck

[–]xiomen 0 points1 point ago

Wall-e

[–]cdcox 0 points1 point ago

Why can't we make clothing that fits in the future?

[–]Elephant_Pizza 0 points1 point ago

GIFEXPLODE

[–]jesse_h 0 points1 point ago

Shut up and take my money. I'm throwing it at the screen, why is nothing happening?

[–]jjy9493 0 points1 point ago

WallE reference? Take my upvote good sir

[–]d2keen 0 points1 point ago

Why don't his arms get fat?

[–]Siethron 0 points1 point ago

Actually we'll get to the point where we'll have nano-bots inside of us, keeping us healthy, indefinitely- so long as they are fueled.

[–]soal1 0 points1 point ago

This is not evolution. It's advancing technology.

[–]Metsa 0 points1 point ago

We won't get fat because of advancements in technology, but there will be a undeniable temptation to connect into virtual machines and become one's own god so to speak.

[–]Nokwatkwah 0 points1 point ago

I don't know about the wizards....but, thank you for this. The end is very true, I'm a fresh 22 year old and no one wants to go out on a Thursday night. What are they busy doing? Sleeping...watching TV....

[–]j0nnysp00ns 0 points1 point ago

Google glass, you've doomed us all.

[–]ifeelstabby 0 points1 point ago

False

Liposuction will be cheaper and less painful in the future making fat people a thing of the past.

[–]kount_at_work 0 points1 point ago

combine advisor spotted HL3 confirmed !!!!

[–]BetterThanOP 0 points1 point ago

and, now I'm sad

[–]Sisuth 1 point2 points ago

You missed the part where the guy explodes

[–]Silence2358 0 points1 point ago

Very cool concept. I started reading a book a few days ago called 'You Are Not a Gadget' (Amazon Link). It's all about how we are becoming consumed by technology, and it is taking away a lot of our human individualism/characteristics.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]socialruins 1 point2 points ago

Or drunk, shit just blurred together. I had no idea what was happening.

[–]socialruins 0 points1 point ago

don't forget your towel

[–]Belugajones -1 points0 points ago

I'm ok with this outcome

[–]trex88 -1 points0 points ago

just going to say this isn't accurate. we have already hit a point where a lot of people in first world countries never really need to move more than like 1/4 mile a day. and another thing doing exercise doesn't actually make you lose weight it converts fat to muscle which is denser. people generally gain weight after they start working out. for example if i ran 20 miles i would burn the same amount of calories that i burn naturally in a day.

[–]Metsa 0 points1 point ago

When people talk about 'losing weight' they are referring to burning fat. If you were capable of running 20 miles consistently, your metabolism would be so efficient that you couldn't be fat if you wanted to. I don't even see why you claim this isn't accurate. What are you even disagreeing with?

[–]kvachon -3 points-2 points ago

Fine by me.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. © 2012 reddit inc. All rights reserved.

REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.

π Rendered by PID 24479 on app-135 running fc22e53.