Every class i've ever taken in college was evolution centered. If from you're perspective the evidence towards evolution seems pretty conclusive, you can imagine how overwhelming the evidence is from my perspective.

Its seriously is like having to prove to an adult that Santa doesn't exist, you can imagine what the preexisting mindset must be like for there to even exist an adult that believes in Santa. When I even picture in my mind an adult that believes in Santa i picture a mentally challenged adult. Its not about the belief in Santa, its about the true underlying factor that caused him to have such stunted development.

I've gone down the road of trying to explain dispersal and divergence as a precursor to evolution, they hit me with that oh so beloved statement "if we came from apes, why are there still apes?" Me saying, "i literally just explained that to you" does no good.

As a final point, anyone open to believing something because of scientific evidence pretty much already accepts evolution. There's a minority of people open to science that has never exposed themselves to evidence to evolution, but they're much rarer then we tell ourselves that they are. Past my final point, I love being right, so I still debate with them, but I have to go into aforementioned state of mind when they respond.

Again, I'm happy to answer any semi-rational question, but if arguments like these don't work "two is not a viable population, there would not be enough genetic diversity and all populations would collapse" and "the dispersal pattern on Earth is not central to Mt Ararat as Noah's Arc would suggest" then the person has more growing up to do before i spend any of my time on it.