this post was submitted on
2,265 points (64% like it)
4,951 up votes 2,686 down votes

space

unsubscribe154,789 readers

197 users here now

"Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known". -Carl Sagan

You might also enjoy:

r/starparty

r/nasa

r/astronomy

r/cosmology

r/spaceporn

r/astrophys

r/aerospace

r/spaceflight

/r/spacemusic

/r/SpaceX

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 207

[–]setht79 122 points123 points ago

This has been my phone's lock screen for several months now. It's one of my favorite astronomy pics of all time.

[–]Larursa[S] 42 points43 points ago*

Right there with ya.

edit: Just going to post some info here since it's at the very top of the thread :

As some have pointed out, the image I linked to isn't truly "real." The color contrast is exaggerated. Here is a link to the same picture without the changed color contrast. (I actually think this one looks better.)

It also is not a single photo, but rather a mosaic of several different photos. Redditor Frencil (who actually helped process this image) can give you more info on that here. (I would just ctrl-F "Frencil," everything he says in this thread is gold. The man worked on the imaging team for the Cassini mission, he knows what he's talking about.)

Earth is the bright dot just outside the main set of rings on the left side and a little up, inside the first set of faint rings.

[–]REDDIT- 229 points230 points ago*

I guess you are right, but the NFL draft is on ESPN right now so we will wait and see.

And I'll be holding you to our friendly little wage earlier. :P

EDIT: Wrong thread, please disregard. Sorry.

[–]the_naysayer 63 points64 points ago

you get an upvote for the confusion caused

[–]the_red_phone 12 points13 points ago

doesn't anyone want to know what the wage[r] was?

[–]ryeguy146 10 points11 points ago

The r index of the iterable object referenced by the wage variable? An associative array lookup? The suspense is killing my feeble programmer mind!

[–]big-o-notation 3 points4 points ago

And he didn't even bounds check!

[–]vORP 2 points3 points ago

karma my son, karma.

[–]zubrin 6 points7 points ago

I thought this was going to be a Kanye moment.

[–]kommando208 28 points29 points ago

This photo is incredible for another reason. The reason that you see the hazy "whisps" off of Saturn is this photo is due to one of Saturn's moons: Enceladus.

Enceladus is unique because internal pressure is causing the moon to eject fluid from its corn into space. That fluid: H2O.

For this reason, Enceladus is considered by many to be the prime candidate for life on another planet in our solar system. It's interesting to realize that this photo may have two bastions of life in the same frame.

[–]LiminalMask 38 points39 points ago

This just in: space corn found on Saturn's moon. Orville Redenbacher unavailable for comment.

[–]sirbruce 18 points19 points ago

Now I may be just be a simple country Hyper-Chicken, but I know when we're finger licked.

[–]Kage2021 0 points1 point ago

Comment of the week! Is there anything you would like to say to your fans in accepting your award Mr. Mask?

[–]LiminalMask 1 point2 points ago

I, for one, welcome our new maizean overlords.

[–]Kage2021 1 point2 points ago

This makes sense, as blasting cultivated crops into space is widely recognized as the intergalatic equivalent of saber rattling.

[–]Morningxafter 7 points8 points ago

agreed! it's been the wallpaper on both my computers and my phone for a while now.

But I have a weird obsession for Saturn. It's such a mystery. Like the hexagonal cloud pattern that's been rotating over Saturn's north pole since the 80's.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

Woah... are there any explanations of what's causing that? Magnetism maybe?

[–]Vaypo 0 points1 point ago

What's so mysterious about it? -no sarcasm

[–]eazyd 2 points3 points ago

It's just.. Where do you see hexagon clouds in nature except in laboratories?

[–]JJFO 1 point2 points ago

On Saturn.

There's a lot of human brain trickery going on when you call them "hexagon clouds". It is not a hexagon, it's not made up of straight lines, its edges are smooth curves. But people love shapes and the formation is somewhat hexagonal, thus it's a hexagon in the popular media.

Its a strange formation, and worth studying, but polygon-like shapes are created in fluid experiments.

[–]big-o-notation 0 points1 point ago

On Saturn obviously.

[–]Morningxafter 1 point2 points ago

It's just that you don't often see cloud formations like it outside of when a lab artificially creates it. Furthermore, this formation has been holding its shape rotating over Saturn's north pole since they first discovered it in the 80's. And who knows how long it was there before being discovered?

There's a lot of other things that baffle scientists regarding Saturn as well. Like the two-tone coloring divided by the equatorial ridge along its moon Iapetus and other mysteries regarding its moons and rings.

[–]jesse_h -2 points-1 points ago

Upvote for hexagonal cloud pattern

[–]Mippoose 105 points106 points ago

Silly question, but one that I'm quite curious about. Are most, if not all, of these pictures colored after being taken?

[–]Frencil 580 points581 points ago

Former Cassini image processor here (and I contributed to the processing on this image). The imaging system on Cassini is two cameras, each with one sensor (one megapixel) and a variety of filters on wheels to take frames in different parts of the visible, near IR, and near UV spectrum. Color products are made by combining three observations taken closely together using the red, green, and blue filters.

Some other fun facts about this image:

  • It's a 165 frame mosaic (the largest ever produced by the imaging team), taken over a 12 hour observation period.
  • Two new faint rings were discovered in this observation.
  • It took nearly a month to process this image from raw VICAR files into the final product you see here.
  • As others have pointed out the Earth is visible in this observation. Here's a magnified view of the Earth from the same data set. That fuzzy protrusion to the upper left would be the moon!

Did an AMA a while back too if you're curious.

[–]V4lidus 91 points92 points ago

I would just like to thank you for your work. The image you helped put together has given me a completely different view on the universe, our pale blue dot, and my life. Without your work my future could be completely different, so thank you. I am well and truly having a man crush.

[–]Frencil 69 points70 points ago

Your man crush is making me man blush.

[–]DoctorQualified 30 points31 points ago

nowkiss.jpg

[–]AskingVikas 1 point2 points ago

How was your life changed by this?

[–]V4lidus 14 points15 points ago

It didn't directly change my life but it changed me, making me change my life. I feel that things I have accomplished now and hopefully what I will in the future are because of what that image represents. I think the feeling I had when I first saw it was very similar to what is described by people when the first saw Earth from Space. I do things now for me, and I know I am very small part of everything that ever has been or will be, but I have to make it count, because I am lucky to be here.

[–]AskingVikas 0 points1 point ago

I wasn't being hateful, I was just unclear on how something like that might have changed your like so significantly, as you had made it seem earlier.

[–]God_is_dead 14 points15 points ago

Why don't we also take pictures with a regular camera to give the rest of us what our naked eye would see? It would be better received in my opinion by people who have trouble believing these too perfect computerized pictures. Not complaining just honestly curious.

[–]Frencil 123 points124 points ago

When going all the way to Saturn you need to be really choosy about your equipment. A regular camera would break down in the radiation-filled vacuum of space so a special camera is needed. One that can survive for decades in space functioning perfectly, continuously.

Now as to the optics - all consumer cameras are effectively the same. All CCDs capture light the same way by using color filters to get distinct values for red green and blue. The difference is your camera already does all that post-processing using an onboard computer to convert RAW files to JPEGs using some algorithms that make a "best guess" at the colors (or, if you shoot RAW, play with all the color settings in a processing program like Photoshop to see just how hard it is to define "true color").

The Imaging Science Subsystem on Cassini is a science instrument first and an imaging device second. To do real science on the data it collects the instrument needs to be finely calibrated and we need to know exactly how it works and what its systematic errors are. Furthermore, by having independent filter wheels we can do more than just the old red/green/blue. By adding filters for near UV and near IR light we can see more than the human eye can - and this can lead to some dazzling results.

Case in point: Titan. Titan is Saturn's largest moon and is shrouded in a thick orange haze that's denser than our atmosphere on Earth. Here is how Titan looks in "true color". But look at Titan in the near IR part of the spectrum and BAM! All kinds of amazing topology.

Voyager didn't have the right kind of instrumentation for looking underneath Titan's hazes. You could say that its imaging device was closer to a "normal" camera. When we went back with Cassini we went prepared to see much more than we've ever seen before - more than human eyes are capable.

[–]God_is_dead 13 points14 points ago

Thank you for the reply. Awesome. I've always just asked myself what would I see just with my eyes and I guess you answered that and then some. Thank you.

[–]irokie 2 points3 points ago*

If you ever see Venus through a telescope, you see a white ball (sometimes a crescent). However the Mariner Magellan probe used radar to get pictures of Venus's surface, which we now know looks like this. Which I think is pretty neat...

Edit: Thanks to saturnelia for pointing out that it was the Magellan probe that mapped the surface of Venus using Radar.

[–]saturnelia 1 point2 points ago

Magellan.

[–]Caracicatrice 3 points4 points ago

Fascinating response, thank you. I am just curious do you have any photos of Saturn in "true color" for comparison as well? I am really sad my eyes will never see that well!

[–]Frencil 19 points20 points ago

"Natural color" is a common phrase used in captions for the closest approximations of true color. I say approximation because, after all, is your green the same as my green? Better ask a neuroscientist. Or a philosopher. ;)

Here's a quick search on Ciclops.org, the imaging team site. Images are also served from JPL. There are definitely some false color thumbnails in the there so be sure to read captions!

[–]eulerup 2 points3 points ago

What does Earth look like in these other spectrums?

[–]nastylittleman 1 point2 points ago

I have read about some of the hot-rod things scientists have been doing with Cassini. Blows my mind.

I am full of admiration and gratitude for the work you and your colleagues are doing.

[–]avnerd 1 point2 points ago

Thank you so much for being on reddit. It's redditors like you that made me fall in love with the place.

[–]wlievens 1 point2 points ago

You think a "regular camera" doesn't do any processing? The images just magically pop in?

[–]God_is_dead 0 points1 point ago

Not at all. Just trying to point out the fact space pics look heavily manipulated and processed. A naked eye type picture side by side with a picture such as the one on this thread would make more people believe these are real images. People always doubt the authenticity of pictures that are "manipulated" and "processed" because of our fear of photoshop.

But yes I believe there is a little bird inside every camera "magically" chipping away at a rock to get an image on it. Just like on the Flintstones.

[–]wlievens 0 points1 point ago

Juxtaposing a picture that's close to naked eye would indeed be a good idea.

[–]Larursa[S] 12 points13 points ago

As I started reading your post, I thought to myself "man, this guy/gal should do an AMA." Then I got to the bottom and went "awwww I missed it :( "

Truly jealous of your opportunity to work with the space program.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]Frencil 20 points21 points ago

The phase angle (angle from sun to Saturn to Cassini) in this image is something close to 180°, so the sun is literally behind Saturn. That means the parts of the rings extending beyond the limb of the planet (the outer edge of its disk) are fully illuminated by the sun like dust on a windshield when driving directly into a sunset.

The parts of the rings inside the limb are completely obscured from the primary light source. Therefore they're lit only by distant starlight, which is negligible, and the diffuse light from the adjacent rings and high atmosphere of the planet near the limb. This light is coming from a different direction (around rather than behind) so it illuminates different areas and casts different shadows.

The biggest challenge I had in my time working with images from the ISS was understanding the orientation of the rings from shot to shot. The ring disk is staggeringly wide - almost 270,000km across - but as little as 10 meters thick in some places (and never more than 1km or so). For all intents and purposes this is a two dimensional object. The light on it is always changing, shadows play tricks, and then the spokes start showing up.

[–]Youdontknowme12 1 point2 points ago

Dude, you know your shit. I'm impressed.

[–]aerique 0 points1 point ago*

What kind of work are you doing now?

How can one graduate from the awesomeness of what your were doing to a new (and more interesting?) job?

edit: nevermind, I just read it in the AMA

[–]freeloadr 1 point2 points ago

Well you are a creepy lurker.

[–]feenicks 11 points12 points ago

Far out, there's moments like these when you realise just how freakin awesome that Reddit and the Internet in general is.

5 min work break and not only do i get to see one of the most dazzling pics ever, but get inside info about it straight from the horses mouth as it were... :-)

Thank you good sir.

[–]lukearens 4 points5 points ago

I'm so glad you exist

[–]MaeBeWeird 1 point2 points ago

Thank you for linking to your AMA! I was just going to ask if you would do one when I saw the link :)

[–]sightcast 1 point2 points ago

Why does Saturn always look so fake?

[–]nebarnix 1 point2 points ago

You say the protrusion is the moon but when I look at all of the stars in the image there are multiples, all of the points in the area of the earth have this "moon". You sure that isn't an artifact of the spacecraft movement and tracking cameras during the 12 hour change in orbit?

[–]Frencil 2 points3 points ago

If you look closely at the stars in the contrast enhanced mosaic you'll see the aberration increases as you approach the edge of the image. Also note that the aberration on the stars is clearly multicolored - like the R/G/B channels aren't lining up. This is an artifact of having a much more narrow focus - Saturn is aligned in each frame but the stars are not.

Now look at the close-up of the Earth from the mosaic. This product was produced separately, given the very important nature of the subject, and the alignment was done relative to Earth (not to Saturn). The fact that the bulge to the upper left is still there shows that it's not an alignment artifact - it's something real.

The caption for the image product describes what part of Earth we're looking at (the Atlantic Ocean and the western coast of north Africa) despite not having the focus to confirm this. We know this with certainty though because our vast array of technology throughout the solar system keeps very good track of where all the planets and moons are relative to one another. Based on all the data for the positions of celestial bodies and the sophistication with which observations are planned the pointers of the spacecraft not only knew that Earth would appear in this observation but that we could expect to see the moon to the upper left - and that was several months before the observation was taken. The only question was how well the imaging device would actually resolve it, and this image is our answer.

[–]nebarnix 0 points1 point ago

Dream! Thanks for the clarification :)

[–]rraaarr 0 points1 point ago

I like that from other planets, Earth looks like a star. Imagine there's someone out there (providing there's sentient life) looking up and pointing randomly to earth and saying ... I wonder what it's like up there...

[–]spattem 0 points1 point ago

If you dont mind me asking where do you do your research?

[–]Frencil 3 points4 points ago

I'm not a scientist. The bulk of images were actually processed by a handful of nonscientists since the scientists are busy using the data to build models of the Saturn system. Only the rare really special ones would get final processing by a member of the research team.

Nowadays I run an IT department, but thanks for your interest!

[–]virtualroofie 0 points1 point ago

Where else but reddit haha - wow

[–]Xet 0 points1 point ago

So would it be possible to find some of these images in higher resolution somewhere?

[–]Frencil 2 points3 points ago*

Looks like the highest resolution released was just shy of 4000px wide. For some reason JPL provides a slightly smaller version, so here's the imaging team page with links to full sizes. I recommend grabbing the PNGs for lossless compression.

EDIT: Here is a companion set of image products that highlight the Earth more specifically. These are the products I actually worked on - the full mosaic was produced by a very talented image processor named Daren Wilson.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

You are way cooler than I can ever hope to be.

[–]nasa1fan 0 points1 point ago

Terrific reply -- thank you for the education!

[–]kranzb2 0 points1 point ago

Why is the image of the planet like 2D?

[–]drewkungfu 0 points1 point ago

You have just clarified my vauge dream job into a realty! Thank you! So when do I start? or where should I start?

  • also: 12 hour observation: Any parallax problems with perspective... i imagine possibly with Saturn's rings.

[–]imgonnacallyouretard 0 points1 point ago

Why did it take a month to process the data? How much raw data are we talking about? If its 165 frame mosaic, with 3 colors per frame and 2 cameras at 1 megapixel resolution, isn't that only slightly more than a gig of data uncompressed(my assumption is 1 byte per pixel...)?

[–]Frencil 0 points1 point ago

The data footprint is not what's important. The alignment of channels is easy when you're talking one frame, but difficult when you're looking at multiple frames that all ultimately must be aligned into a single product. Also consider that aligning frames containing Saturn's limb or high-contrast parts of the rings can be relatively easy but aligning frames limited to diffuse rings and stars is very difficult.

On top of all that a single image processor never works on just one product at a time. It's a constant flood of data from the spacecraft and there are always observations sitting around that haven't been touched (but really deserve the treatment) so while this product took a month it was not the only thing that transpired in that month.

[–]ThatsAboutIt 26 points27 points ago

This photo is touched up, but it is simply exaggerated color contrast. Here is some information about the photo's. Including the original photo as V4lldus posted

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA08329

[–]mattverso 3 points4 points ago

Wow I hadn't seen the original, un-enhanced version before. I think I actually prefer it.

[–]V4lidus 1 point2 points ago

Thank for the link that's a really interesting read and an awesome site I hadn't seen before.

[–]V4lidus 9 points10 points ago

Here is a video of someone "making" the hubble images, and here is a link to NASA's site explaining how it is done. From what I understand the cameras have filters on them to detect certain parts of the light spectrum and NASA put those colours back in there to recolour the photo. However I have also read other articles where they add red and blue when there is other light radiation that you wouldn't see with a human eye, either to show what that part of the spectrum is doing or to make the image look more interesting.

I would like to presume however that the image above is the orginial taken by the probe and this is the retouched one.

[–]wtmh 1 point2 points ago

Adding the Sabre Dance makes any demonstration video awesome.

[–]shhhhhhhhh 1 point2 points ago

This is what I wanted to ask too. I'd love to read about the coloring process for this picture and in general, if that is the case.

[–]Larursa[S] 42 points43 points ago

Link to APOD page

Earth is the bright dot just outside the main section of rings on the left side.

[–]pondering_a_monolith 21 points22 points ago

Wow. I'm continually amazed by Sagan's point that everything we know, everyone we know is on that little dot.

[–]chriswastaken 10 points11 points ago

Don't forget everything we knew and everyone who has ever existed came from and perished on that blue dot.

[–]pondering_a_monolith 4 points5 points ago

I know. It simply boggles my little brain. It's photos like this that remind me how we so aren't the center of the universe. That it goes on just fine without us.

[–]gegc 6 points7 points ago

I also like to remember that if anything happens to said dot, humanity will end. Unless, that is, we get our collective heads out of our collective asses and get on with colonization programs.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points ago

Ah... am I the only one who believes that the Universe would do just fine without us colonizing it?

[–]Langston_huge 3 points4 points ago

What do you mean 'do just fine'?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

I mean that it will make no difference either way.

[–]bigfkncee 13 points14 points ago

It would make a difference to/for humanity.

[–]resdriden 1 point2 points ago

Same argument could be made that "it will make no difference" to "the Universe" whether (insert anything that can happen) to (insert name of person, community, country, etc). No more relevant a comment about human space colonization than it would be about what kind of vegetables I should plant or whether Syria has a big civil war or whether there's a big crunch or a big rip--it would do just fine either way.

[–]gegc 0 points1 point ago

Realistically, we'll only be able to colonize a veeeeery tiny piece of the Universe until we turn into some kind of "duck-shaped purple cloud god" (I don't remember where I first heard that phrase).

[–]gegc 1 point2 points ago

Thank you. :D

[–]falconae 1 point2 points ago

Don't know if that's the original quote, but it's where I read it :)

[–]Synux -1 points0 points ago

Sadly, at times, I'm inclined to think the universe is better off if we don't head out to poison and pollute it as we have everything else. Of course I want to go but I just can't shake the fear that perhaps we are not yet well enough to make the journey.

[–]PilotPirx 0 points1 point ago

"Pollution" becomes very relative and undefined as long as there is no healthy ecosphere. There is not much to be polluted on Mars (as far as we know). We would change the face of this planet for sure, maybe in a way some or many people would not like (oh, why did you bulldoze those nice dunes?), but "pollution" in this sense is just another small and human centered word without meaning in something so big as the universe.

[–]Synux 0 points1 point ago

Well put. Will you concede that we're at least a bit embarrassing as a species and may not present well to alien life.

[–]PilotPirx 0 points1 point ago

Yes, first one to agree.

[–]MBSquared 0 points1 point ago

This is a wonderful website, thanks for sharing.

[–]Larursa[S] 1 point2 points ago

They have an app, too. The first thing I do, every single morning before I even get out of bed, is check to see what the picture of the day is. Can't ask for a better start to the day.

inb4 breakfast.

[–]marishtar 23 points24 points ago

We're natural photobombers.

[–]DivinusVox 9 points10 points ago

Otherwise known as Cassini's most popular image.

[–]obvioustroll 7 points8 points ago

It's a great picture but... it's hardly new. I've had it in my desktop pictures folder for at least a couple of years.

[–]ropers 15 points16 points ago*

For some value of "real" – because that's an exaggerated colour image.
The unexaggerated image is here: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA08329.jpg

EDIT: Maybe I'm wrong. (Sorry.)

[–]Larursa[S] 15 points16 points ago

I'll be honest, I think this one looks alot better.

[–]willtherealwilshire 1 point2 points ago

Is this the original processed version done by the Cassini image team, which was then reprocessed or exaggerated for the apod version?

[–]Frencil 5 points6 points ago

Both the "normal" and contrast enhanced versions were processed and released simultaneously. When work was already underway on the more natural view it was clear that a lot of the most interesting features weren't all that visible (like the diffuse E ring - only recently confirmed to be generated by the geysers of Enceladus). They were there, just kinda dim.

So we produced the contrast enhanced version in parallel to really illuminate what was lurking in that spectacular observation. Then everybody is happy!

[–]willtherealwilshire 0 points1 point ago

Thanks for making me extra happy with your response!

[–]ropers 0 points1 point ago

Oh.

I just read this again (actually I'd only skimmed it before), and now I think I had things the wrong before – it seems that the version I linked to is the exaggerated one. Unless I'm completely confused now?

[–]MalcolmY 1 point2 points ago

Why does the planet looks "kinda 2d", flat? With the rings in the front of the planet looking that way?

Is the Sun exactly behind it?

[–]Neon1986 0 points1 point ago

I was wondering this too.

[–]GargamelCuntSnarf 0 points1 point ago*

i have to venture a guess that it's due to the even exposure & focus across the image.

Likely, the distance at which it was shot leaves very little difference in focusing from the parts of the planet at differing depths. (i.e. focus at infinity)

Also, it's possible that it looks 'flat' due to the fact that it's a mosaic image built from a bunch of different photos. They may have wanted them all to appear in-focus, and to have an 'even' exposure.

This would be the other explanation for why it appears 2-d, but I'm not an astronomer, just a photographer. So I might be totally wrong on both counts.

[–]catchthehawk 10 points11 points ago

Check out all its majesty!

[–]LFAB 11 points12 points ago

With those beefy rings

comin' out of the back of its neck

that looks pretty good

[–]vowdy 13 points14 points ago

Needs more consummate V's though!

[–]MusikLehrer 3 points4 points ago

You know you're getting old when kids these days don't know about Homestar.

[–]analogkid01 2 points3 points ago

S A T R U N

[–]vowdy 1 point2 points ago

You keep doing your thing, man!

[–]FOOGEE 3 points4 points ago

Isn't this one of the top all-time /r/space posts?

Still, I fucking love this picture, it was my desktops background for a few years when it first came out.

[–]Larursa[S] 0 points1 point ago

I did a quick search and didn't find anything. If this was already posted then I guess my search wasn't good enough =/

[–]RuchW 1 point2 points ago

This should solve your issue. Nevertheless, I hadn't seen this photo before, so, thanks!

[–]Garrettishere 15 points16 points ago*

This is Neil deGrasse Tyson's homepage background on the Hayden Planetarium's website.

[–]cohensh 9 points10 points ago

Pretty sure during one of his AMAs he said this was his favorite picture.

[–]HermanPain 0 points1 point ago

Yeah that's when I first saw it. And made it my background of course.

[–]V4lidus 1 point2 points ago

Is the above image the same as an image I am currently using as my wallpaper but not cleaned up?

[–]oiseauxtoujours 1 point2 points ago

My favorite.

[–]dtallee 1 point2 points ago

One of the coolest Saturn images ever.
I wouldn't call Cassini "drifting", though :)

[–]nefthep 1 point2 points ago

Besides the view of Earth, the most spectacular thing with this image is how it reveals an extra set of very fine rings orbiting Saturn that we cannot see from here.

[–]jnangano 1 point2 points ago

Ultimate photobomb!

[–]gonzal61 1 point2 points ago

Where on earth is this?

[–]Michaeljikels 1 point2 points ago

I like how I posted this picture just a few days ago and nobody noticed it :(

[–]omnimatty 1 point2 points ago

That girl making the duck face on Earth ruined it for me.

[–]boi_howdy 1 point2 points ago

For those that haven't checked it out, there's a great series of TED talks on Netflix about the universe and one of the seminars is given by one of the leaders of the Cassini team. She shows off the same image but also quite a few others that are absolutely awe inspiring. I recommend it to any dork like me that would rather sit around and watch documentaries instead of re-runs of CSI....

You can also just check them out straight on TED.com. Good stuff

[–]heavym 1 point2 points ago

It is very difficult to tell which are moons, planets, stars or just my dirty monitor screen.

[–]Sirtubb 1 point2 points ago

damn universe you are looking fiiiine.

[–]OutlawGrrl 1 point2 points ago

"Consider again that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar", every "supreme leader", every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam." - Carl Sagan

For the whole quote, look here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wupToqz1e2g

[–]TheBassThatAteMiami 1 point2 points ago

Someone said Astronomy? Check out these big motherfuckers.

Oh, and this guy.

[–]aidrocsid 0 points1 point ago

Desktoped.

[–]uptherockies 0 points1 point ago

I have never seen this before, apologies. /newdesktop. Thank you!

[–]jaaake 0 points1 point ago

this is magnificent

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Cassini is an amazing mission. Several trips around Saturn, a probe to Titan, geysers of Enceladus, etc.

[–]irish711 0 points1 point ago

This picture just forced me to create one of those facebook timeline deals!

[–]Jezon 0 points1 point ago

Hey, I can see my house from here!

[–]43sevenseven 0 points1 point ago

Wow. I've not seen this before. Thanks for posting!

Awesome background image

[–]dizzyfingerz3525 0 points1 point ago

Photos like this are enough of a reason to keep funding NASA.

[–]thavipasnipa 0 points1 point ago

This was used in one of Neil Tyson's presentations.

[–]Norko 0 points1 point ago

This has been my background for the last month.

[–]djfutile 0 points1 point ago*

Anyone know if this picture is a literal shot? That is, pure, unaltered photo of Saturn? If not, how much prep does this kind of shot need before it looks so fantastic? Edit: found my answer in the comments. Thank you fellow space nerds.

[–]Sarcasm_Llama 0 points1 point ago

Are you the guy who was browsing Reddit in my Earthscience class today? Because my prof was just talking about the planets and showed this picture!

[–]Sweddy 0 points1 point ago

This is my wallpaper right now! :D

[–]Krashin 0 points1 point ago

That is beautiful...

[–]tfghtfgh 0 points1 point ago

If you google search "images" this is the 5th picture to come up.

[–]poop22_ 0 points1 point ago

If only real life could look like this.

[–]acegibson 0 points1 point ago

What day was this taken? It was an APOD in 2006.

[–]vandezande 0 points1 point ago

Pale blue dot :D

[–]balla786 0 points1 point ago

There was a really good TED talk about Saturn and it mentioned this picture as well. You can also find the Ted talk on Netflix astronomy series.

[–]BUCK3TM4N 0 points1 point ago

that is really cool

[–]chimpanzee 0 points1 point ago

Whoa. I just got back from seeing Neil deGrasse Tyson give a talk where he showed this picture, was planning on looking for it to make it my background, and here it is! Thanks, OP!

[–]SliceOfButter 0 points1 point ago

I can't believe I haven't seen this before.

This picture is absolutely incredible.

[–]StinkyBritches 0 points1 point ago

Phenomenal photo.
I got my girlfriend a custom framed print of that image for our 2-year anniversary.

[–]newjerseykita 0 points1 point ago

Can you imagine how scared that satellite must be, all the way out there. D':

[–]revenantae 0 points1 point ago

What light am I looking at here? Visible spectrum with a really long exposure, or something else?

[–]HelpMeThink 0 points1 point ago

Why are Saturn's rings so uniform?

[–]ltx 0 points1 point ago

A spacecraft 1 billion km away sent that marvelous photo.

[–]Burdman49 0 points1 point ago

What is real?

[–]OrionStarr 0 points1 point ago

DAT RINGSHINE...

[–]bashobt 0 points1 point ago*

This maybe a stupid question, but how is it possible that you can see the constellation of Orion?

Do not all the arrangements of stars we see in the night sky fall into that familiar order because of the tilt of the earth and its vantage point?

Shouldn't completely different views of the same stars be seen in this picture?

[–]afornase 0 points1 point ago*

The stars of this galaxy are so far away that, on the galactic scale, Saturn is basically in the same point as Earth; therefore, the stars have the same constellations even at Saturn, or anywhere in our solar system's region. Think of it this way: if our sun is in New York City (and the size of a marble) then the entire solar system would easily fit within ten feet of that marble. The nearest star would be in Washington D.C. and the second nearest star (all marble sized) would be in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. All other stars are much, much further. So, if you move anywhere in that ten foot circle in New York City, your perspective doesn't really change at all on the rest of the galaxy.

I recommend a free planetarium program called Stellarium. It allowss you to see the night sky from all planets and moons in this solar system (at any point on said planets) as well as on many other stars (Other stars, because they are so far away, do have different constellations from their perspectives.)

EDIT for clarity and grammar.

[–]JaggedOne 0 points1 point ago

Which dot is earth? The one just to the left and slightly above the center of saturn?

[–]gmduncanidaho 0 points1 point ago

This is the wallpaper of every computer I own. I absolutely love this picture!

[–]seth4 0 points1 point ago

Funny this has been my wallpaper for quite some time now.

[–]MattsAccount 0 points1 point ago

Ditto iPad sleep screen

[–]somepuertorican 0 points1 point ago

Whoa. I just saw this picture at my intro Astronomy lecture today.

[–]s34nsm411 0 points1 point ago

I realize that this must be an HDR image in order to get the brightness level of saturn you see here, but how is there any light bouncing off of saturn to begin with if the sun is the only light source in our solar system?

[–]Sindelian 0 points1 point ago

It's amazing to see the actual width of Saturn's rings.

[–]JohnCJ 0 points1 point ago

Every. Single. TED shows THIS picture.

[–]AdamMcFly 0 points1 point ago

Saturn doesn't give a fuck about us in this picture.

[–]CocaChola 0 points1 point ago

I saw this on an episode of Ted Talks last night. Simply beautiful.

[–]superanth 0 points1 point ago

Is Earth that little blue dot in the upper-left ring?

[–]fecesfacial -1 points0 points ago

My iPhone just shit the bed trying to open that.

[–]zhgtrees 0 points1 point ago

It's pictures like these that make me remember that our planet is a major player in the solar system. While there probably wasn't, if there had been intelligent life on any planet beyond us before, they would have seen us as this mysterious figure in the distance, that they would long to explore! How cool is that to think about.

[–]drobilla 0 points1 point ago

This will always be my favourite space picture.

[–]shawnaroo 17 points18 points ago

Ok, but when some astronaut gets a totally bitchin' photo of the alien world destroyer exploding Jupiter, you'll be sorry you already committed to this one forever.

[–]drobilla 2 points3 points ago

Ah, but for the good ol' days, when awesome pictures of Saturn were the best there was, and aliens havn't destroyed the world... ;)

[–]kurtozan251 0 points1 point ago

What about the ones from your upcoming space vacation?

[–]yes_istheanswer 0 points1 point ago

When will we send a.) a RED camera to Mars and the moon, and b.) a RED camera and/or an DSLR around the solar system to take pictures and video?

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]tyme 14 points15 points ago

...I really hate to complain...

Then why didn't you just, you know, not complain? Move along to the next post.

[–]TheJabrone 17 points18 points ago

This is my first time seing it, so I would like to thank OP for posting it. Thank you.

[–]aidrocsid 7 points8 points ago

You have to remember that not everyone has seen everything you've seen, just as you haven't seen everything everyone else has seen. Life would be boring if we'd all seen, learned, and experienced exactly the same things. There are always gaps to fill.

[–]pondering_a_monolith 1 point2 points ago

I think it's a French proverb, to teach is to learn twice.

[–]Larursa[S] 3 points4 points ago

You act like everyone who's on r/space now has been into space since the photo came out almost 6 years ago, and that everyone who is subscribed to r/space knows of every picture that has ever been taken of space.

Not the case.

[–]ThatOtherGirl 4 points5 points ago

I'm a seasoned redditor. I consider reddit and the Internet to be my biggest hobby but this is the first time I've seen this pic.

[–]obvioustroll 2 points3 points ago

Agreed.

[–]thenorthend -1 points0 points ago

I've never seen this. You might as well delete your comment. It's possibly the best picture I've ever seen and I'm glad I saw it today

[–]RearmintSpino -1 points0 points ago

Ehhhh...... It's real in the way that a crazy over saturated, unworldly HDR photo is "real".

Is this what you would see if you were out there floating out there orbiting Saturn? No, no it is not.

[–]feeblemuffin -4 points-3 points ago

it's as if any space picture that is reposted is allowed to be reposted purely because it is a space picture.

[–]keryskerys 1 point2 points ago

Not to be argumentative for the sake of it, but I've been on reddit for a year and have never seen this picture.

However, I have seen the constant rage about "reposts" on almost every third thing I click.

OK, some "famous" reposts that you see regularly are annoying, but can't people just not click and move on?

Judging by the comments here, I am not the only one to have not seen this picture, and the discussion that followed was interesting to me.