this post was submitted on
1,150 points (54% like it)
6,620 up votes 5,470 down votes

WTF

subscribe2,159,753 readers

8,569 users here now

New Rules:

  • No screenshots (e.g. Facebook, Youtube)
  • No memes, captioned images.
  • No rage comics
  • No politics / posts with political implications - Includes Activism, Call for public outcry etc.
  • No re-hosted web comics
  • No begging for upvotes
  • No links to reddit
  • Personal information is not allowed and will be removed, repeat offenders banned
  • Links to facebook are not allowed
  • NSFW posts must be tagged or will be removed.
  • Gore and Porn are not by default WTF, consider posting the more extreme stuff to /r/spacedicks

All (& only) things that make you say WTF. The moderators of /r/WTF reserve the right to moderate posts for not being WTF and would be more appropriate in more relevant subreddits.


Thanks to licenseplate for the excellent logo & thanks to humansmartbomb for the previous logo


Please DO NOT post personal information

Such posts or comments will be removed and offenders may be banned. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


Shout Outs:

/r/weird

/r/creepy

/r/creepy_gif

/r/offbeat

/r/WTFart

/r/NSFW_WTF

/r/sfw_wtf

/r/BugWars

/r/awesome

/r/toosoon

/r/mildlyinteresting

/r/FanTheories

New: /r/tifu

New: /r/MorbidReality


Exceptions to the rules can be granted by the moderators; The moderators of /r/WTF reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–][deleted] ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]WhyAmINotStudying 472 points473 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Looks like you just jammed some truth up all our anuses.

[–]BloederFuchs 209 points210 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In the name of the father, the son and the holy potato. Anus.

[–]ShellOilNigeria 68 points69 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Nice, well rounded comment.

Like a potato.

[–]mrupyours13 29 points30 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Nice, well rounded comment. Like an anus.

[–]johnq-pubic 38 points39 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I can honestly say that a potato has never lied to me.

[–]coreycubed 39 points40 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Someone's obviously never played Portal 2.

[–]_sexpanther 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Get back to studying.

[–]aahxzen 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

POTATO_IN_MY_ANUS is the light, embrace it

[–]Smofo 47 points48 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Also apparently the guy that got 15 years was a repeat offender.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not only that, but he was on parole. So he hadn't even finished his sentence for his previous crimes yet.

[–]mecrosis 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm sure the rich Guy had only done his crime once.

[–]seeasea 31 points32 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

repeat offender doesn't mean committed more than one crime, it means (contrary to literal meaning), repeat convictions.

[–]Bipolarruledout 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

His crime was not stealing on a larger scale. Smart criminals always steal in bulk so you get a volume discount.

[–]xiaodown 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Homeless people commit crimes by simply existing. I'm sure he is a repeat offender; the question we, as a society, should be asking ourselves is "How much of this and other offenses he has committed are a product of the man, and how much of these offenses are a product of his environment?".

[–]ifyouknowwhatimeanx 48 points49 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thank you, I never trust bullshit pictures like this.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]freedomweasel 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

At which point it'll get reposted to reddit, the pitchforks come out and the mob tries to get someone fired for something that didn't happen.

[–]fuckthesaints -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I didn't until the whole Treyvon thing. Now I halfway believe the ones I see.

[–]Carvin1988 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't even know about the Treyvon thing yet. The dude was followed and then he attacked the fatass and then the fatass shot him?

The pictures in the media show a 13-year-old Treyvon (and he was 17 when he died) and a 2005 mug shot of Zimmerman. They are clearly trying to get rage out of people to sell more ad space for their headline news programs.

[–]Chesstariam 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The fat picture the media is circulating is 7 years old. He's actually a lot thinner now.

[–]UninformedDownVoter 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You obviously believe one side of the story, talking about Martin taking the offensive against Zimmerman.

[–]fuckthesaints 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Something like that. I haven't followed it very much. It's only so big because of media. It didn't catch my attention, because I know there are worse stories out there that don't come to light.

[–]whiteknight521 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Furthermore bank robbery probably has really high minimum sentences, and the law may not distinguish between robbing a bank for 100 dollars or 10,000 dollars. I am not sure about that, though.

[–]BIG_PY 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I guess he didn't get his reservation at Dorsia.

[–]randomb0y 65 points66 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Also there's a difference between fraud and armed robbery. IMO fraud shouldn't even necessarily lead to a prison term. Just take away all their money and make them do a shit ton of community service. We spend way too much money keeping people in prison for non-violent crimes.

[–]fernandowatts 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Must admit though that remorse should play a factor, especially if it is what turns yourself in. The whole point of prison is to rehabilitate, but it doesnt happen. Imagine what kind of man he'll come out after 8 Years of prison vs getting a slap on the wrist sentence and community service?

[–]randomb0y 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I completely agree that 15 years seems way too much for what he did. Sentencing is insane in the US.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You're focusing on the amount he stole. Robbery generally means someone was injured during the commission of the theft. So the higher punishment is for an actual, injured victim.

[–]jimmy_three_shoes 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He pretended to be armed, so he is charged with Armed Robbery. You'd get the same sentence if you stole $25 from a 7-11, or $10,000 from a bank. Also, many states in the US use a three-strike system. If the guy is a repeat offender, he'll get a harsher sentence than if it's his first time. Usually the 3rd strike is a rather long one.

[–]underbridge 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Another problem here is the overpopulation of our prisons. Why should taxpayers be paying for a homeless guy's room & board for 10 years because he stole $100. He gave it back. Case solved.

[–]jimmy_three_shoes 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Many times in colder climates, the homeless with commit petty crimes to get a jail stay. Being warm in prison is better than being cold on the streets. Also, robbing a bank usually carries a minimum sentence, and if it happened to be the guy's 3rd strike as well in a state with a three strike system. Additionally, he acted as if he was armed. It's armed robbery.

[–]BrendanJB 41 points42 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This seems kind of odd to me, too. They aren't dangerous; they're just dicks. They don't need to be rehabilitated, they just need some kind of disciplinary action, and what better way than making them help out a community they tried to take advantage of?

[–]nodefect 25 points26 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Taking advantage of people and squeezing every penny from them until they're left living in the street is more than "being just a dick" in my book ಠ_ಠ

[–]kobescoresagain 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fraud at this high of level would lead me to think the person does need treatment and while they wouldn't physically hurt someone they could cause a huge amount of harm to numerous people.

[–]Aikidi 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Honestly, I think a fair punishment would be a massive fine on top of taking the money back and a wage garnishment for a certain number of years; forcing those who commit widescale fraud to live with a low income ceiling, whatever is deemed appropriate to sustain themselves and their families, for a number of years as a sentence.

Force those who take large sums of money to live as the people who they took it from would have had to live, for a short amount of time. Once their probation/garnishment period has passed, allow them to regain their prior wealth and hopefully some perspective.

[–]jjbalto 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hard to do in practice. People at that level have lots of resources. You could take away all his money, but family and friends could still make sure he is living well. They would justify it by "I don't want to see my brother's wife and family to suffer," and he would benefit, too.

But, then again, homeless dude's standard of living might go up in prison.

[–]IEatRosaryBeads 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Nevermind. Saw the rest of the convo.

[–]pryoslice 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I've heard the opposite argument (link). The net damage to society is often greater in cases of theft than murder. People use money to protect their own lives (by buying safer cars, moving to safer neighborhoods), wealthy people commit less violent crime, and government uses money (hopefully) to save lives by investing in services like police and firefighters. It may be more worthwhile to punish thieves than murderers harshly. There's a reason the Bible suggests cutting off a thief's hand. The guys (not the Guy) that wrote it weren't dummies. edit: spelling

[–]NotaManMohanSingh 33 points34 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Let me ask you a theoretical question - If you had your life's savings invested in one of these banks / white collar financial fraud rings, would you be making this brilliant discrimination?

Money robbed is money robbed...and if anything this homeless dude needs to be praised for his actions,

To all them folks saying "Grease bag co-operated with the authorities hence a reduced sentence is justified" the homeless dude in question here solved the damned crime by turning himself him in, not sure that the fat cat capitalist banker did that? He got caught, and then decided to rat on his former partner for a lighter sentence...

There is no justification for this kind of "justice" - its an absolute perversion of that word.

[–]Davey_Hogan 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ever think that the homeless guy wanted to go to prison..... 3 squares, a bed, TV, gym ect......

[–]vvav 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ever think about how fucking sad it is that there are people whose lives are so shit that they can be improved by getting sent to jail?

[–]randomb0y 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

would you be making this brilliant discrimination?

Absolutely. Again, my argument is about violence. Money has nothing to do with it. If you catch someone stealing money, you recover as much as possible, take everything he owns away from him, make him do community work, whatever. There's very little consolation for me to see him in jail, even if I lost all my money thanks to him.

If he pulls a gun or a knife on the other hand, especially if he actually injures someone, he needs to go to prison. I don't really believe in the ability of correctional facilities to actually turn violent criminals into law-abiding citizens, but at least while they're in there they can't hurt anyone who's not in there with them. One can only hope that once they get out, they'll think twice before doing it again.

[–]gorillapoop 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's not about punishment, it's about deterring the crime. I think a lot of people would be less likely to commit Fraud if they feared more than just winding back at "square one".

[–]pantoum 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Meanwhile the white collar guy is working on his next scheme to bilk your grandma out of her last $10,000.

[–]Bipolarruledout 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Call me old fashioned but I think we need to bring back tar and feathers and then run it on a 24/7 public shaming network.

[–]i_ate_god 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm very much pro community service, as it means that society doesn't have to continue to pay for a crime, and instead society can at least get something out of it.

But, many left wing elements will cry foul over this because they think it's some kind of slavery, and that it will lead to tougher and tougher laws just to increase a free, or incredibly cheap, legal workforce.

The left wingers may have a valid point, but the problem then are the laws themselves, not the idea of community service.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the spectrum, right wingers are profiting handsomely from for-profit prisons and it gives them an institution to further some of their obvious racist tendencies.

[–]HonziPonzi 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

at the same time, I don't think that homeless man had the opportunity to defraud a brokerage firm... to me it's the same crime, just because one is a crime with the opportunity to NOT raise a weapon to commit it doesn't mean it's less evil

[–]randomb0y 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My argument is not about opportunity, it's just about violence. I fully support sending someone to jail if he pulled a gun on me. Even if the poor homeless guy is actually more honest than the fraudster.

[–]SirWistfully 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I started noticing how potato is in a lot of threads after somebody mentioned it. Cannot unsee.

[–]HeroicDanger 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I can't decide whether he is karmanaut's new sockpuppet, or andrewsmith1986 sockpuppet

[–]FuriousMouse 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"He got a 40 month prison sentence because he co-operated with investigators and helped exposed the wrongdoing."

The homeless man surrendered himself to police the next day, cooperated and said he needed the money for food and to stay at the detox center.

No matter how you try to twist it, I can't see how the homeless's man crime was more severe.

[–]Prof_G 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

armed robbery can go wrong, people get hurt physically. Fraud, not so much.

[–]I_SHIT_KARMA 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What would happen if our usernames collide?

[–]CK159 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Potatoes go in, Karma comes out. Can't explain that.

[–]MrSpontaneous 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That would mean:

POTATOES = KARMA

Ye gods...

[–]Captain_Higgins 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No love for Ireland

[–]DigitalOsmosis 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Finally a lucky break for the Irish

[–]spunkychickpea 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's Friday. MOTHERFUCKING UPVOTES FOR EVERYBODY!!!!!

[–]Sillylovesongs 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]redleg86 2 points3 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But with the homeless guy, the article says he turned himself in. How can that not be equated to cooperating with investigators? I think in that case, it makes the original comparison valid.

Besides, the homeless guy turned himself based on guilt, the (former) CEO cooperated simply to get a lesser sentence.

Edit: I supposed the homeless guy may have cooperated simply to go back to prison, as suggested by Donitsu.

[–]Donitsu 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This may come as a shock to you, but I've known of several homeless people committing these acts just to go back to prison. 3 squares and heat isn't all that bad when you're in a decent block.

[–]Jo-Diggity 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

wee he is intelligent! I likes Reddit.

[–]Aikidi 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You pretty much said what I wanted to. Beyond that, I feel that taking large amounts of money through co-organizing fraud is different in its nature than directly threatening someone with physical harm to take a small amount of money. The price may be smaller in dollars and cents, but it seems to me to be far more deplorable to threaten someone's life violently. Even if he only pretended to have a gun.

[–]Tezdoll 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

i had a mortgage with Taylor Bean and Whitaker. It was a bad time.

[–]drummer1059 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The homeless guy apparently robbed a bank, a little bit different

[–]CicconeYouth04 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yet, it made it to front page regardless. You stay classy and well informed, Reddit.

[–]BKachur 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

people also need yo understand statutory maximums and minimums... while the example seems extreme you are forgetting your talking about armed bank robbery. historically this crime has led to people getting shot/injured/taken hostage. furthermore the teller was his hostage at gunpoint along with anyone else in the bank. long story short, case law and statutory law is such that they don't "take it easy" with armed bank robbery and we also do not know this guys record. if it was his 5th robbery then maybe this was the straw that broke the camels back.

finally just because he was sentenced doesn't mean the case is done. while he cannot appeal the charge he can appeal the sentencing which any PD office in the country would do.

if you got this far thanks for reading... doubt anyone will due to number of posts but I always go to the comments to see if anyone makes a logical argument to explain why this happened rather than bitching about the system for the 1000th time

[–]Magzter 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I aspire to be like you.

[–]SpaizKadett 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

15 years for $100 is fucking insane no matter how you spell it!

[–]Mesmerise 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Totally agree.

There's a reason why the guy resorted to stealing. Seems to me to be desperation. How on earth is 15 years in prison going to help anyone?

[–]DrGnz0 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, he's homeless so prison is a step up. 3 meals a day and a bed.

[–]ChaosRegiert 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sir William Wallace would disagree.

[–]yteicoskcuf 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If he was too poor to buy food and shelter then he'll be living better in prison than he had been. In short, 15 years in prison helps him.

[–]mejelic 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

which is probably why he returned the money instead of keeping it. He knew that if he walked back into the bank he would be arrested.

[–]sje46 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He robbed a bank. It doesn't matter if he got one million dollars or five cents. He went in and tried to steal other people's money using the threat of violence.

[–]DRhexagon 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Also, you're not taking into account priors..

[–]SpaizKadett 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't really care, he hasn't killed anybody. Nobody who hasn't killed anybody should be sentenced so hard, nobody

[–]Solomaxwell6 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Assault and battery, DWIs... he could've easily killed someone, and it's only by luck that he hasn't.

[–]CressCrowbits 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The consipiracy theorist in me kind of believes people repost this image in the full knowledge of the real story behind it, because they want to undermine perceptions of the very real unfairness, classism and racism in the justice system.

[–]Tasty_Yams 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Maybe POTATO is the OP, under another screen name.

DA-DUM!

But you are quite right. The gist of the post; that there is one law for the rich and one for the poor is completely true. This is just a bad example of it. Purposefully?

[–]SOMETHING_POTATO 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Plus last time this came around a bunch of websites pointed out that the homeless man had prior convictions. Of course, when you're talking about a single homeless person it's hard to verify statements about them, and most of the websites quoted one another, never going back to an official source, but a bunch said things along the lines that he'd served prison time for armed robbery and assault in the past.

[–]battlesmurf 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I love you.

[–]SubtleSweet 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thanks for the helpful info! It's amazing how easily we'll become outraged at the idea of injustice. I was mostly angered that the homeless guy got 15 years. I guess he's not homeless anymore? :S

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Right, and I feel bad for the guy, really I do.... but he did technically rob a bank-- and the penalty for that felony is pretty steep.

[–]akfekbranford 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Exactly!

And, of course, there is the difference in seriousness between theft by pushing paper into piles that one should not and theft by freaking ARMED BANK ROBBERY.

Edit: For completeness

[–]newfag_tr0ll 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's not clear if he was armed.

[–]steviesteveo12 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There's not a lot of difference between between making someone think you're going to shoot them if you haven't got a gun or if you do. The next step up is actually shooting someone but the fear's the same for the victim if it's a real gun or it's a banana wrapped in your jacket..

[–]akfekbranford 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, yeah, if you want to be technical it was most likely aggravated robbery because the mechanism he used to intimidate the bank teller into handing over money was merely a threat of a weapon, but armed robbery is pretty much the colloquial term for what he did, so it is what I used.

Edit: And if you really want to get technical, one would have to look up the robbery laws in the state that this occurred and look up his case to find out exactly what he was convicted of, but is this really something important enough to bother with?

[–]freedomweasel 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you tell the bank teller you have a gun and keep a banana in your jacket pocket, I'm fairly sure you still get charged with armed robbery.

But, as you said:

is this really something important enough to bother with?

[–]steviesteveo12 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you tell the bank teller you have a gun and keep a banana in your jacket pocket, I'm fairly sure you still get charged with armed robbery.

That's certainly the law in the UK. It's functionally equivalent to having a gun, telling the bank teller you have a gun and then not firing it.

Fundamentally, if you walk up to a bank teller and they actually put their hands up or ring the alarm or hand over money it's not because they think what's in your pocket is a banana.

[–]karikamiya1234 52 points53 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

not wtf.

a picture of a man screwing a tailpipe is wtf

this is not

[–]RelevantYiff 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]karikamiya1234 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]karateblitz 76 points77 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

When this was posted earlier last year, I read on a comment saying that the man had prior convictions in petty robbery and/or drugs charges. So the 15 year conviction kinda makes sense. Although he was remorseful, he should have realized the seriousness of robbing a bank, especially being a black homeless man.

[–]Frightened_Inmate_1 92 points93 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Also, sometimes homeless people commit these types of nonviolent crimes specifically so they can be put BACK in jail. To some people a bed, three square meals, and free health care in jail is better than being homeless. Not saying this guy did it, but it does happen.

[–]anotherbozo 55 points56 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's a shame that for a homeless man to achieve a bed and 3 meals with health care, he has to go to jail.

[–]OverlordTommyWiseau 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm sure if you offered him some of your money he'd take it

[–]Italian_Barrel_Roll 27 points28 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How is this a nonviolent crime again? From the teller's perspective, someone threatening to have a weapon under their jacket is just as traumatizing regardless of whether the weapon is real.

[–]Aikidi 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Seriously. Pointing an unloaded gun at someone and pulling the trigger won't physically harm them, but I guarantee that will do some damage.

[–]PsyanideInk 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It isn't a non-violent crime. Even if there was no threat (with or without a weapon) robbery is inherently a violent crime, and is dealt with as such, both statistically and judicially.

[–]crashlovex3 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In the past year there was a story of a man who stole a dollar from a bank and told them he would sit in the corner until they called the police. Turned out he had some serious health issues but he couldn't afford health insurance and he knew in prison he would get treatment.

[–]UninformedDownVoter 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"Dude! He was a criminal and should have realized the seriousness of his crime! Why couldn't he have just gotten his parents to help out, or while he was at work ask reddit to give him donations man?!??" - typical redditor

[–]PsyanideInk 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just one caveat: technically robbery is always considered a violent crime.

Unless the article misuses the term "robbery" and actually meant "larceny/theft" or even "burglary" then this was a violent crime.

[–]yunus89115 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Nonviolent is the guy who handed the teller a note saying this is a robbery please hand over $1 then sat in the corner to await the police. This guy pretended to be armed. It's still unjust that you could steal $B and only get 40 months but 15 for armed robbery of a repeat offender is sad in this case but not unjust.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]Igggg 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sorry, the 15 years sentence for a $100 robbery, where no one got hurt, and where the guy turned himself in the next day does not make sense under any circumstances, regardless of how many prior convictions that guy had. In fucking Europe people get that much for murder.

[–]TurgidDahlia 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"...he should have realized the seriousness of robbing a bank, especially being a black homeless man."

In other words, precisely the sort of person who NEEDS to rob a bank so he doesn't fuckin' die in a ditch.

[–]UninformedDownVoter 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The fact that shit like you quoted gets upvotes makes me die inside a little.

[–]Iknowofnothing 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well at least he solved his homelessness problem

[–]LetsPlayDotA 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Agreed with you up until "black homeless man", what the hell? Why is it more serious because he is black?

[–]squigs 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, the "homeless man" had several previous convictions, was the person entirely responsible for the crime, and was a direct menace to an individual who had the right to perform her job without being threatened at gunpoint.

The CEO was a relatively minor conspirator in part of a larger organisation. The cost was purely financial and any hard done was fairly abstract. Nobody was put at immediate fear of their life as a direct result from these actions.

His position of CEO was pretty much in name only and he was something of a patsy here.

It's still a little imbalanced, because the CEO had representation and the bank robber didn't, and this is an inherent unfairness in system but not nearly as WTF as implied.

Lee Farkas was the ringleader and chairman and was sentenced to 30 years.

[–]pwylie 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Lawyered.

[–]z1mb0bw4y 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This has probably been said multiple times, but the guy's homeless. Prison is a massive boost in "home-havingness" than homeless. You get 3 healthy meals per day, a bed, a roof over your head, and time to exercise. This man has it made now.

[–]cragwatcher 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

the devil is in the detail, which none of us actually know. Until we have all the facts, we cant say if this is fair or not....

did the homeless guy have previous convictions? the corporate guy was jailed for 'his role' - we dont know what it was...

on the surface it looks shit, but who knows?

[–]wcmbk 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

We do know the facts actually, from the last time this hit the front page of reddit. Like 4 minutes ago.

[–]Vuul 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He now gets a place to stay and free meals

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]mikecngan 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Every time I see this post, the same thing happens:

OP: HOW CAN THIS HAPPEN?!

Hive-mind: YEA! HOW?! upvote!

Reasonable mind: Relax, you don't know the whole story.

...Oh...

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Could have sworn I'd seen this reposted more than 3 times.

[–]startled-giraffe 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

see 6 more matches

[–]ConorMaximus 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.

[–]greenbags125 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's a great way to get three squares a day and a roof over your head for 15 years

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fraud is non-violent and doesn't require a weapon.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yet it costs the economy much more.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It actually costs the company. BTW, Citibank repaid their 'bailout' debts in full.

[–]Aikidi 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is where you start to play a dangeous utilitarian game. Sure the bankers may have defrauded investors of billions, but this may have merely been many rich people becoming slightly less rich because a smaller group of rich people took their money.

Is this more costly than someone potentially losing their life in a robbery? What dollar amount do you put on that clerk's death? If someone steals $1,000,000 without any potential of causing physical harm to someone while someone else stabs a guy and takes his iPod, which is more damaging? What if it's $1,000,000,000? What if the guy dies?

Very tricky.

[–]OptimusYPrime 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It isn't that tricky. Talk to an actuary - they do it all the time. You're treating necessary practical considerations as philosophical questions. They shouldn't be conflated. They are both valid, but entirely different contexts.

[–]TChuff 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ah this again. First they are in different states with different legal systems. Second, the bank robber had previous convictions.

[–]Darrian 21 points22 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Umm.. he still robbed the bank. This isn't elementary school where you can just say you're sorry and everything is fine.

Edit: oh didn't notice the part above that. In any case I have no problem with the homeless guy doing time for robbing the bank, but other guy should have done serious prison time too.

[–]FrogsOblivious 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well another issue is that we're wasting $$$ putting someone like that in jail for FIFTEEN years. Money could be much better spent in something more productive for him. Hard issues to deal with. :/

[–]Roryrooster 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I dont think its the 15 year Sentence that is being questioned… it’s the 40 month one, for a much bigger robbery.

[–]autopsi 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fraud != Armed Robbery

[–]callmelucky 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I question the 15 year sentence.

My question is: That is fucked.

[–]komyutrallaia 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm perfectly happy with someone who commits armed robbery at a bank getting 15 years jail. According to this page he also has convictions for

battery, robbery, theft, resisiting arrest and public drunkenness

So three strike rule came into affect.

[–]Vocalist 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah,

kill a boy wearing hoodie -> no charges.

Murder your own daughter -> nada.

Murder your wife -> nope.

Steal $100? -> Fifteen fucking years.

[–]Aikidi 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I wonder how trivialized white prisoners must feel reading posts like these.

There is certainly a racial bias in our justice system, but it isn't as if white guys are born with a few "get out of jail free cards" in their genes. It is still usually at least a bit due to the nature and circumstances surrounding their crimes.

[–]Grizzlyshippers 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

also to keep him in jail for that long, you might as well give him the $100 and free up the tax payers

a simple community service order would have done (for the homeless guy this is)

the greedy CEO well it just show a corrupt system.

[–]83alx 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Armed robbery is not fucking fraud.

edit: He had his hand in his pocket but what would you think was in there in that situation?

[–]BKachur 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

if you are robbing a back you are implying possessing a deadly weapon and it is treated as such. If the law let things slide based on that idea then every bank robber would just use spray painted Bb guns and get lesser sentences. point is the threat of ending someone's life was there.

[–]CiXeL 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

sounds like he was doing him a favor. he wont have to worry about a meal or a place to live for 15 years.

[–]shadow1515 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm guessing the homeless guy did that on purpose so he has a place to live and food to eat. Not to mention healthcare, which plenty of people with jobs and homes don't even have.

[–]xtian11 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Clever homeless person gets home for 15 years.

[–]enjoythenow 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Isn't 15 years in prison good for homeless people?

I heard they have Cable, Gym, a bed, food, a library, and courses to turn your life around.

That sounds better than sleeping on the cold streets for even 1 more year.

Not sure if the system is fucked in this case or if the judge meant to give him a home for 15 years.

[–]roxitor 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What if they put the homeless man in prison so that he would get free food, water and a roof over his head?

[–]srvstrat71 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To be completely fair he's going from homeless and hungry to having a bed, toilet and meals every day....prison seems like a better living situation for him to me. Fifteen years is a long time though its true

[–]Li5a 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Man, the system is just so fucked. Did you know that in the CSC (Correctional Services Canada) there are only 3 people in the human rights sector... THREE PEOPLE. And that is including one co-op student. Mother fuckers.

[–]probo1 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

HEY, at least now he has a home!

A taxpaid home :D

Everyone wins!... except everyone:(

[–]MONDARIZ 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Although I’m not really surprised, it’s funny to see how many redditors find a nice ray of sunshine in that story: the poor guy has a home now. How the hell is it possible to miss the point so completely? It’s not about those two guys, but about a penal system that so obviously is not blind. That does not meter out fair and just sentences, and that do not represent something most people associate with justice.

[–]champsd 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Paul Allen= American Pyscho

[–]doctorralph 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To be fair, Paul Allen does have some really great business cards.

[–]pmcfarl 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Mandatory minimum sentencing?

[–]jaygibby22 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

40 month sentence for being greedy, but a 15 year sentence for a minor felony that was committed in order to stay alive. Honestly I think the homeless guy got rewarded for stealing - free food and housing for 15 years sounds better to me than 15 years living on the streets not knowing where your next meal is coming from and where you will sleep

[–]HisRoyalHIGHness 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This isn't always true, however, there are times when homeless people get caught for crimes intentionally so that they have a room and a bed. This is especially common for those in places with harsh winters. Perhaps in the case of this homeless man he had done that a few times and has now violated the three strikes rule, causing the length of his sentence to increase. There are so many unknowns with this story, not to mention the bias of the journalist etc.

[–]supermegafuerte 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If I were a homeless man, I wouldn't bat an eye at being given a 15 year lease, three meals a day, a place to shit, medical care, and a bed. It's not ideal, but it's better than living on the streets.

[–]supergingerlol 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm so happy that I don't live in America! :)

[–]jdubsbody 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well he is black..

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Maybe the judge did him a favour? At least in prison he has a bed, shower, food and healthcare to look forward to everyday. We don't know any other facts surrounding this but perhaps he was better off in prison.

You might argue that this is a retarded argument to make, because he has been denied justice and what-not but I'd argue that there is no justice when a man (or woman) has no home, food or healthcare and the state doesn't intervene to help.

Still, I'm speculating.

[–]Skitrel 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Robbing a bank with your hand under your shirt whether or not you have a gun is still a fucking horrible thing to do. The person on the other end of the interaction has no option but to THINK that you have a weapon. Ever been robbed at gunpoint? I'm pretty sure I'd find it fucking terrifying.

Not sure about over there in America but over here in England this is classed as armed robbery regardless of actually having the weapon or not and as such you'd be subject to getting charged with armed robbery, regardless of handing yourself in. The starting point for armed robbery? 15 years.

I see no problems here. There's definitely problems with the rest of the system, in that he should be able to get the help he needs to detox if that is indeed what he needed the money for, but armed robbery is still armed robbery and it still affect those on the receiving end of it the same.

[–]Phreakradio 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If the guy is homeless and hungry...wouldn't prison actually be an ideal place, aside from the constant threat of death and rape?

[–]aletoledo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's called government. More specifically democracy. It's two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.

[–]bongtin 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Who the fuck would downvote this post?

Edit: typo

[–]bonecrusher1 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

rich people always get short sentences or dont get sentenced at all... this world orbits around money

[–]JDStrings 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I guess he'll at least have a warm place to stay and shouldn't go hungry for a while. Although I don't know much about prison.

[–]ZeldenGM 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In the UK it's the other way round. Some of you might have seen that uni student who got jailed for 'racist tweet' about a footballer that collapsed. The judge jailed him for 52 days saying he should handle his alcohol better.

In Leicester a couple of years before, 2 somali women assaulted a white women in a drunken hate attack leaving her badly beaten and needing intensive hospital care. The 2 women were let off with a community service order because 'they were not used to alcohol due to their culture'

British Justice = Broken.

[–]engibeer-me 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

how is this repost on the front page again?

[–]empw 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How is 40 months slightly less than 6 years?

[–]deadly990 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Is everyone forgetting that he is homeless? perhaps he committed the crime to BE put into prison where he would get shelter and food, although at substantially higher risk in other factors.

[–]ColonelFlashman 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Prison is going to make that homeless guy healthy, sober, fed and warm if he wants it to.

[–]Ninjazanus 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In all fairness, jail might be better than homelessness.

[–]RhinoFeeder 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In America, Prison >> Homelessness

[–]2brainz 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No matter how often this gets reposted, it will change nothing. If you want to change something, get off reddit, go into politics and fix the broken US justice system.

[–]Huangdingo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Has anyone considered the possibility that the homeless man asked to be sentenced to jail for that period of time? Given that he is homeless and needed money for a detox centre, he might have seen prison as the best way. He now gets room and board as well as health care. Pretty smart idea if you ask me.

[–]FlyingVolvo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Capitalism is what's happening. The people with money get shorter sentences. Even if they do some shitty things.

[–]appleofpine 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So...

15 years with a roof over his head, with a meal every day instead of living on the street, sometimes going without food?

Yea, he must be angry.

[–]EvenSteam 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]uncute 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Systemic racism, anyone?

[–]ConfutatisMaledictis 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To all those people who says "At least he gets food, blah, blah" you can not imagine how terrible is being in prison.

Every person in jail is privated of their freedom and that affect their mental health, they usually get violent actions to other prisoners and nobody really cares.

You people, thinking like this is really sad. You have a terrible injustice in front of your eyes and, instead of move your ass to make this world a better place, you try to make it look more acceptable.

[–]Rmanager 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Prison is not a home. I have no real problems with either of these cases and I'm laughing at Reddit's bandwagon jumpers. Still, please stop saying he's "better off". Being in prison is not easy.

[–]skunks66 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While I understand that picture doesn't represent the whole story I find it funny that everybody is saying robbery is MUCH worse than fraud because worst case scenario is a couple people get shot. What you guys don't seem to realize is that in most cases fraud can cause many people to lose their WHOLE livesavings. Granted they made bad investment choices but usually by the time the fraud gets discovered the money is all gone and the people that invested never see a penny of their money returned. Many of these people that lose all their money are retired and have to go back to work and move in with their kids. Fraud ruins way more lives than armed robbery. Fraud>armed robbery

[–]rakust 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Came in here for racism and corporation hating.

Was not let down, stay predictable Reddit.

[–]OttawaMarcin 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Would be easily appealed with the right lawyer as unjust punishment. Also, prior convictions? He's homeless, what were you expecting. Dump people on the street and think their need for food and shelter will disappear?

His biggest mistake was turning himself in. Your mother raised you to be stupid. If society isn't taking care of you when you're down and out, you don't owe society anything.

[–]Snigen 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is fucking disgusting, not to boast about my country, but had he done that in Norway, we would have given him the 100 dollars AND given him help to get a job. Fuck this..

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ignoring the amounts for a minute, just consider that one guy walked up to another person and took money under threat of deadly harm, while the other probably just fudged some numbers in a computer.

Aside from that I'd be willing to bet that the homeless guy had prior convictions and was probably even on probation, while the other guy surely led a mostly clean life prior to his arrest.

The big difference is the amount taken, but there's no question who's the bigger threat to the general population.

[–]whimmy_millionaire 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If I remember from the last time this was posted, the guy on top was one of many who were arrested, and he cooperated and turned on the other guys for a lighter sentence. The one on the bottom, robbed a bank and had prior convictions, and probably couldn't afford a proper lawyer. It also doesn't say if he used a weapon to threaten the cashier, which (and I'm no lawyer) automatically carries a minimum sentence.

[–]devinlucifer 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The homeless man got more jail time because he was sentenced in Louisiana, and the CEO was sentenced in Virginia. The homeless man was black. I'm positive that racism played a huge part in the homeless man's sentence.

[–]RyuKenya 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

homeless guy just got a roof over his head, access to free health care and 2 square meals a day, i would say that was a very wise and calculated decision..!

[–]SippinPippen 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

SIGH fucking repost, obviously if you read into it, you would see that it was his 3rd strike. do some research before posting up stupid bullshit that has been recycled over and over and over and over and over

[–]jcampeon 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Only in America....the land of the wealthy and the hypocrites

[–]cyvaris -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Because he is black.

[–]darklooshkin 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And homeless.

[–]TheRMF 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And had a few prior arrests.

[–]autopsi 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And committed armed robbery.

[–]nitetrip 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He's not homeless anymore. He will be fed 3 squares a day and have the ability to obtain education. Hopefully this will be a positive change in his life.

Having said that, the banker should have gotten life. This would deter other bankers.

[–]Zeraphim 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He just wanted a home.

[–]PurplePower 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Dont worry Patrick Bateman gives paul allen the axe.

...ITS HIP TO BE SQUARE!

[–]nunother 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

3 Squares a day and a roof over your head? Money well spent homeless man. Good job.

[–]wnighttrain 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He's better off in jail anyway. Free food, shelter, and access to learning.

[–]Aldesso 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It Only works in America