It's as simple as this.

Arc_Arsenal · 5 months

Next up, OP is gonna tell a joke about the way white people drive vs the way black people drive. This is some next level shit.

WOMEN BE SHOPPIN!

SyKoHPaTh · 5 months

My formula is rather simple:

(% crazy) = (% chance I'll have a relationship with her)

philsredditaccount · 5 months

Where is "willing to do anal"?

whiteandnerdy1729 · 5 months

So the maximum amount a man can rate a woman is only half the amount a woman can rate a man? This... seems wrong.

Also, I'm pretty sure quite a lot of men go for dumb, stupid, hot women.

Drainedsoul · 5 months

This is basically totally wrong.

n3rd_rage · 5 months

So what you are saying is, Men rate women on a scale from 0 to 2, but women rate men on a scale of 0 to 4.

Good to know?

spock_block · 5 months

As in so many things, it's all down to proximity and valence electrons

naggytaggy · 5 months

I would rather say men rate the girls like this:

= Looks x (Humor + Brain +1).

Even with no brain or humor a hotty is still more than a zero. Other than that, there is a grain of truth in this...

cshultz02 · 5 months

i disagree with what they are trying to prove in their equation. Isn't it true that the person you're with should look good to you? If they don't that's just torture.

defiantapple · 5 months

Yup. Every single woman and every single man on this planet value members of the opposite sex based on this rigid equation. There's no conceivable way a person could possibly not adhere to this stringent formula in their assessment of potential partners. ಠ_ಠ

amirightreddit · 5 months

WOMEN ARE THE WORST, AMIRIGHTREDDIT?

MyEPICBoredom · 5 months

This may sound weird but the male silhouette looks like Tom Cruise and the female silhouette looks like Angelina Jolie. Anyone else see this?

Stuckbetweenstations · 5 months

Guys go for looks! Girls go for status!

wytewydow · 5 months

don't forget that if the guy is a douche bag, that seems to cancel out the requirement to have money or intelligence

Aurora_B · 5 months

If we use PEMDAS, men look at intelligence and humor first!

HireALLTheThings · 5 months

That was a really long-winded, roundabout way to say "Men are fucking shallow."

lambent_human · 5 months

Well shit. I'm an ugly girl so I guess that's about it for me then :c

kabukistar · 5 months

Total possible rating for a guy = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4. Total possible rating for a girl = 1 * (1 + 1) = 2.

ntnhd33 · 5 months

is this why girls can be twice as attached as any guy ever can?

rileyrulesu · 5 months

So women are judged from 0-2, while men are judged from 0-4? Besides that, I think it'd be more ABC, where the max score was one, and the parameters are objective. I don't think anyone would want to be involved with someone who scored a 0 on intelligence or humor, along with looks, male or female.

DoxasticPoo · 5 months

I take issues with the scoring.

1) you weight intelligence & humor the same as money & looks. And that's just not the case. Women will say they like intellect and funniness but I'm a firm believer in not paying attention to what people say, but instead who they do. And the funny unattractive man always makes a good friend (unless he's an asshole comedian type, then he's got a shot, cuz girls love dicks of all kinds)

2) You presume guys are either Attracted or Not Attracted... and that's it. Which is just not the case. I truly believe, despite our superficial stereotype, men as a whole are very interested in all types of women. Yes it's true we love big boobs. Yes it's true we love firmness and jiggliness all in the right places. But almost any girl, can go out on just about any given night, and get laid. So it's not just a 0/1. It's a scale. And it's how drunk I get relative to that scale...

3) What about the gays?

4) You're missing one of the most important aspects of how men view women, the likelihood of actually getting laid. That possibility is a HUGE part of rating. I almost paid $1k to go to a Victoria Secret charity event because the VS girls are so hot, multiplied by the chance of me banging one (which I know, is extremely slim), was almost worth the $1k. But the probability of getting laid and amount of effort I have to put forth are definitely considerations. I frequently shun mad hot girls because they're just gonna be too much work. It ain't worth it.

I hope all those help.

excommunicated · 5 months

I'm more of a "Int * Humor + Looks" type myself.

yuppiexj · 5 months

If this is true for you, I pity your lonely and loathsome existence.

jaskamiin · 5 months

Where's the "boobs" variable?

pncke-pndemc · 5 months

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

[deleted] · 5 months

As soon as I noticed the woman silhouette was making ducklips, I knew the math would be accurate.

andrewsmith1986 · 5 months

Where is Dowry?

OP_karma_whores · 5 months

Anyone seeking more info might also check here:

title	comnts	points	age	/r/
I have a feeling girls will think it's the opposite.	24^coms	295^pts	8^dys	funny
How Girls Rate Guys VS. How Guys Rate Girls	6^coms	10^pts	1^yr	pics

source: karmadecay

stupernan · 5 months

dependencies for men: women must be at least smart or funny (plus good looking) in order to be acceptable

dependencies for women: can be stupid as fuck and totaly unfunny, but as long as he has either money or looks, it can be acceptable. yet at the same time can have no money plus no looks but as long as he's smart and funny it'll work out.

this doesn't seem entirely accurate, for reasons i will not indulge in.

Ron_Mahogany · 5 months

Where is the "HUGE DICK" on the women's side and the "PUTS OUT" on the guy's side?

turtlehana · 5 months

I think everyone initially meets someone based on their looks to some degree. If my husband didn't have awesome hair I wouldn't have walked up to meet him, flirt and get to know home. If he wouldn't of had a personality, been intelligent or funny I would have walked away.

stormbeta · 5 months

For me, it's more like this: physical attractiveness = f( Intelligence * Personality )

Basically, the more intelligent and better personality someone has, the more physically attractive my brain interprets them to be (and vice versa). There's been exceptions, but they're pretty rare (and random - sometimes I find random people attractive out of the blue for no obvious reason and there's little correlation to appearance)

IdleGod · 5 months

I'm glad this isn't true of all of us guys...

rozero1234 · 5 months

ahh yes, the boobie modulus of attraction. a very helpful equation for women, but men have it "hard" wired snicker

kingjehu · 5 months

So the man's score for a woman can be as high as 200 and the highest score a woman can give a man is a 40? There needs to be a way to even those out some.

fastestguninthewest · 5 months

according to my calculations, a woman who is stupid and not funny is also not attractive. thus, this joke is ugly.

duffxyeah · 5 months

Anyone else bothered by the example for the *? I agree that the * is needed to show that what is inside the ( ) is going to be somewhere between 0 and 1, but using 0 for looks completely defeats the purpose of the explanation in the first place...This is obviously based on the assumption that the * is trying to portray that the other female factors besides looks are only to be used to modify a woman's score between 0-10.

Anyone?

MixMixBrad · 5 months

There's the reddit I know and love! One day ranting on end about the rampant misogyny and the next, totally demeaning men like it's some kind of joke. Keep classy kids.

Ifunctiononkitkats · 5 months

As a female who is frequently compared to Chelsea Clinton this only serves to upset me. A lot.

P00CH00 · 5 months

my equation for choosing a women is: sanity+intelligence+humor+looks≥2

ilikebigbutts · 5 months

So women that aren't smart or funny but look good would score a 0 for me? Finding this hard to believe...

jesusapproves · 5 months

You have it backwards.

There is always a guy willing to fuck/date an ugly girl (ok, almost always)

Women are much more selective, so it would be "multiplicative" for them for almost all of it. If anything is a 0 they won't touch it. Where as men, as long as it is wet and warm (and even then there are men who make exceptions).

EdTheThird · 5 months

How I rate reposts: 0/10

Aspel · 5 months

If the variables go from 0-1, that means that for men, women only rate a 2 at most, while men rate a 4 at most for women.

I think they meant to say 1-10, though.

HyperDave · 5 months

Is it wrong I really think the right hand side one should be multiplied by 2 so they have the same maximum and minimum values, 0-4? It bugs me

FoxyGrampa · 5 months

I like how it explains it at the bottom for the women.

RoboPimp · 5 months

word

PsychoBugler · 5 months

I find this homophobic.

Knoxie_89 · 5 months

Its sad that they had to explain the order of operations with the *....

waldoRDRS · 5 months

Each factor should be on a scale from 0 to 2, that way the maximum score for each is equal (8). As it stands, women can only score a 2. Men can score a 4.

tecksbuk · 5 months

TIL everything is black and white.

karma_virus · 5 months

I divide by mental instability rating. Of course that means my own score sucks too, so yay.

JCelsius · 5 months

Is that Tom Cruise on the right?

Athene_Wins · 5 months

Need a fixed version where females only rate based on "(10 * $) + looks"

GoingToOhio · 5 months

mine is quite binary, decided entirely by the boolean "is she willing to talk to me"

LeonardoFibonacci · 5 months

So wait, does this mean that women have a MAXIMUM score of 1 whereas men have a maximum of 3? That doesn't seem right. Maybe you should take the average of the left side.

KarashiGensai · 5 months

False.

pummelhorsie · 5 months

Neither of these is an equation. They're expressions.

PeteyPablos · 5 months

Retarded

CompletelyInsane · 5 months

This made me feel extra bad about myself.

MondayMonkey1 · 5 months

Assuming polynomial inputs for looks/intelligence/humoUr, then you can distribute the equation to looksintelligence + lookshumour.
But if you assume matrix inputs, you actually would have a rather interesting and potentially useful function.

And then you suddenly realize-- I do way too much math.

[deleted] · 5 months

This explains something clever and specific about men's minds, but I don't think the owner of this image asked a woman to reveal something clever and specific about women's minds.

[deleted] · 5 months

This is so far from the truth.

Aww, someone got upset and downvoted everyone.

philsredditaccount · 5 months

What do variables being from 0-1 have to do with the very fundamental mathematical principal of 0 x (anything) = 0?

INTIMIDATINGELEPHANT · 5 months

Err hang on guys, if a female is scoring 1 on looks, and 0 on intelligence and 0 on humour, that makes her a 0 - but what about all of the lovely bimbos out there?

Hopper64 · 5 months

What the fuck, straight people?

tha_dood · 5 months

this is stupid, girls rate guys by looks first, then money, then... well, thats it.

Belaires · 5 months

I always laugh when an ugly nerd says he deserves the hot nice girl; not because she has the same qualities he does, but because she has the qualities he likes. Somehow she is a shallow bitch for not liking him for his nerdy ugliness (the qualities he values in himself but not others). Its a hypocrisy that every 80s movie refuses to address.

(The gendered language is for the sake of clarity. Both genders are equally completely full of shit)

evanthesquirrel · 5 months

As a man who has sent women to the male friend zone, I can say this is accurate.

Flamewall26 · 5 months

Leave money under the women, get rid of everything else.

Preparing for downvotes from whiteknights who have yet to experience the real world.

drivingtowork · 5 months

I would say definitively that $ i the multiplying variable for women.

darkflow42 · 5 months

youre dumb

philotimon · 5 months

It's funny, because its true.

Looks, intelligence and humor are Lim x->0. Money is really what they're looking for.

kudzukosh · 5 months

For guys, I think that this is a decent model, but not complete by any means.

Every guy's preference is actually a tweak of this formula. For example, mine is:

rating = (-(-smoker)) * (looks) * (intelligence + humor + libido)

funny

MODERATORS

you'll need to login or register to do that

create a new account

login