this post was submitted on
462 points (63% like it)
1,089 up votes 627 down votes

atheism

subscribe1,149,789 readers

984 users here now


Help Atheist Organizations!

The Secular Student Alliance, Camp Quest, and Foundation Beyond Belief were all nominated for the Chase Community Giving program, which awards grants based on the votes of the public. Everyone gets 2 votes on Facebook, plus an additional one if they share a CCG page. The links for them are:

SSA | CQ | FBB

Voting runs from September 6-19


Welcome to r/atheism, the web's largest atheist forum. All topics related to atheism, agnosticism and secular living are welcome here. Please read our FAQ.

Please link directly to any images or use imgur to avoid being flagged as blogspam

New posts: New Rising
Self posts: New Relevant
Non-image posts: New Relevant

Recommended reading and viewing

Thank you notes


Related Subreddits <--the big list

GodlessWomen YoungAtheists AtheistParents
BlackAtheism AtheistGems DebateAnAtheist
skeptic agnostic freethought
antitheism humanism Hitchens
a6theism10 tfbd AdviceAtheists

Events
10/5-6 NAPCON2012 - Boston
08/11 Regional Conference - St. Paul MN
Giving
DWB/MSF fundraiser
Kiva lending team
FBB's Appeal to Freethinkers to Fight Cancer
Camp Quest
Ex* Groups
ex-Muslim ex-Catholic ex-Mormon
ex-JW ex-Jew ex-SistersinZion
ex-Bahai ex-Christian ex-Adventist
Assistance
Coming Out
Atheist Havens
Start an Atheist Club at Your School

Chat: #reddit-atheism on irc.freenode.net

Watch: #/r/atheism on reddit.tv

Read The FAQ


Submit Rage Comic

Submit Facebook Chat

Submit Meme

Submit Something Else

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 115 comments

[–]SirHagbardCeline 94 points95 points ago

I hate this picture. Sure, religion was involved in 9/11, but to pretend that the antecedents to the attacks were solely based on religion, with no consideration of the complex political, economic and military factors contributing, is wrong. It is quite possible that without religion, the world trade centre attacks would still have happened.

[–]BargainTuesday 24 points25 points ago

To be super technical, without religion 9/11 wouldn't have happened because there would be no WTC or even America. None of us would even exist and the world would be populated by an entirely different group of people and most of the borders/countries would be different as well. Religion has had such a huge hand since the dawn of civilization in almost every facet of life that everything we know today would be different.

Whether or not it would be far better or worse is wild speculation. I'd like to think better, but it's such a huge factor that it's really difficult to make a reasonable guess.

[–]salzone0816 0 points1 point ago

Yes, to be super technical, you're right. Religion has shaped every aspect of the world as we know it, and had there been no religion ever, the world would be drastically different.

However, I think this misses the point. The implication of the picture is that 9/11, looked at in isolation (or at least a much narrower scope than all of history) would not have happened without religion. SirHagbardCeline is saying that religion is at most a contributing factor to 9/11, and certainly wasn't a necessary part of the plot. You could easily imagine individuals executing attacks on U.S. soil for solely geopolitical reasons.

[–]ivantowerz 5 points6 points ago

I wish there was a god. And he was a cool guy.

[–]dancewreck 4 points5 points ago

you should write a book

[–]YvesSch 1 point2 points ago

Don't forget the intergalactic space vehicles with cold fusion reactors that would be flying behind those towers.

[–]DarrenBurton 11 points12 points ago

It's easier to blame islamic extremism. GOD FLIES INTO BUILDINGS, HURDUR.

[–]frenlaven 1 point2 points ago

bingo. it's important to note that atheism, tho defined analytically as a lack of belief, here (in this subreddit) functions with a whole host of other associations. One is a very reductive narrative that treats various politics as solely religious, or motivated by religion, in a way that is laughably simplistic and naive.

[–]Ragnalypse 3 points4 points ago

But... the civil war was still all about slavery, right?

[–]MonsterSnowGoon 1 point2 points ago

I hate this picture as well. It's overly simplistic and provocative.

[–]MapleSyrupIsAwesome 0 points1 point ago

I love this picture. It's accessible and provocative.

In other words, you are not wrong, but there are two sides to this coin.

[–]packerbacker1221 1 point2 points ago

I was about to say this. Even without Islam, bin Laden could have been infuriated enough by the Gulf War that he would have attacked America.

[–]ref6738 2 points3 points ago

Yes but if it were not for the cultural divides motivated by religion the hostilities would never have existed...

[–]MonsterSnowGoon 1 point2 points ago

There are economic divides as well. Also culture is influenced by a lot of things, not just religion. History, language and indeed beliefs all play a part. It's very unlikely the world 'would be as one' if there were no religion.

[–]ref6738 0 points1 point ago

I didn't say they would be as one. Human nature is to be at odds with something, but religion is the great divider.

[–]johnnynutman 1 point2 points ago

the US history of foreign intervention played a big role in this. religion is used a justification by them, but if the US had never got involved in the middle east after WW2 (especially with Israel, but also Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan) then maybe it would be different.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Where do you think those complex political, economic, and military factors come from?

The economic factors are still there but the religious factors ENABLE us to do things like invade Iraq because they have oil...

[–]wasniahC 0 points1 point ago

That's true - Religion is an enabler. A lot of people, however, take the stance that it's the motivator, which is what his point is against.

[–]jmarFTL 0 points1 point ago

Religion is a motivator as well. The biggest conflict in the Middle East is two groups fighting over a chunk of land that is literally meaningless without religion. And America's stance in said conflict is the source of much of the hatred for us. Yes, there are many other factors, but religious divides are still a huge problem.

[–]wasniahC 0 points1 point ago

Ah, that one I'll agree with. That being said, people who say things like, Osama caused 9/11 just because religion, are really missing a lot of the bigger picture. It's not so black & white, but I reckon people give it more credit than it deserves, often.

[–]DangerousIdeas -2 points-1 points ago

No. Religion justifies the things we do for economic reasons.

For example. Many people (including people in this subreddit) believe that Racism was the cause of slavery. This is not true.

Economic motives was the cause for slavery (whites saw an opportunity to obtain a free, sustainable work force). Religion was brought into play to justify that action.

Economic motives were the reason why 9/11 fell. If you believe the "official" story, then the terrorists were interested in hurting America by crippling the economic capital. They justified such an outrageous action by saying "God wanted it to happen". If you don't believe the official story, then, well, you know how it goes.

[–]THEREFOREiEXIST 0 points1 point ago

Indeed. Slavery is actually the cause of racism.

[–]FahmuhA 35 points36 points ago

Whenever I see this picture, I imagine a mushroom cloud from a nuclear bomb with the caption: "Imagine no science."

[–]trees_please 9 points10 points ago

Thanks for this. People are people, they will use the tools of science and religion as a means to promote peace and happiness or destruction and pain. It's up to us as individuals to decide how we use those tools.

[–]lubak 3 points4 points ago

The difference is science doesn't claim itself a source of morality, while religion does.

[–]virnovus 6 points7 points ago

That depends on whether you consider philosophy to be science.

[–]FahmuhA 1 point2 points ago

Science spawned from philosophy, but is a separate field of thought all together. Science answers the "how," while philosophy asks, "why?"

[–]pornmonger 2 points3 points ago

The difference is science doesn't claim itself a source of paradise or eternal damnation, while religion does.

FTFY

[–]FahmuhA 0 points1 point ago

I know too many people who tout science as a means to "better mankind" to agree with you.

[–]Full_Circle 0 points1 point ago

If it weren't for science we'd be living to our early 30s, a small infection would be life-threatening, disease would be rampant, we'd have an exponential decrease in the standard of living. No religion? We'd have a lot of people alive who weren't dead.

[–]The_Karma_Farma 2 points3 points ago

People will always find excuses to kill other people, the root of most religious conflicts has little to do with actual religion and everything to do with social/political situations. Religion serves as a handy justification.

[–]science_diction 1 point2 points ago

Really? So the life expectancy of pre-industrial Japan was early 30s?

Even the average life expectancy of Medieval Europe was higher than your estimate.

No religion? We would have had a bunch of people killed for the direct reasons: politics, racism, xenophobia, accumulation of wealth that religion is merely a scapegoat to cover over.

Yes, we would have a decreased standard of living, but it isn't a binary equation. Even if it were all religion or all science humans would be killing each other and squandering resources that could save lives for PROFIT. That is human nature.

[–]MonsterSnowGoon 0 points1 point ago

Actually a better point.

If the use of nuclear bombs, eugenics and man made viruses are a perversion of science then so is religiously motivated murder a perversion of religion.

You can't have it both ways, preaching the benefits of science and dismissing those that have misused it as not being representative and motivated by other means but not applying that standard to religion.

[–]Joeygforce -2 points-1 points ago

Your able to live to be 50 and than be killed by a smart bomb.

[–]Full_Circle 0 points1 point ago

Oh yeah? Who's going to kill me with a smart bomb? Terrorists?

[–]science_diction 1 point2 points ago

It's those bastards from East Asia, don't you listen to the Ministry of Truth reports?

[–]Mshur -1 points0 points ago

The US government might...

[–]MonsterSnowGoon -1 points0 points ago

Yes. Science isn't responsible and a imagine of a nuclear bomb with the caption 'Imagine no science' would be just as silly as this picture.

[–]FahmuhA -1 points0 points ago

I think you get it.

[–]Gregadeth -3 points-2 points ago

So how was the nuclear bomb made with science? Did it evolve from previous generations of bombs?

[–]science_diction 1 point2 points ago

It evolved from the need to completely obliterate the enemy. It evolved from a need born of human nature just like religion was a need to make a monolithic entity to unify minds in order to destroy the enemy. Just like government was a protection racket to protect against being destroyed.

To act like behaviour doesn't influence evolution is pretty goddamn shortsighted. The nuclear bomb is a product of human evolution just like every other tool of our own destruction.

[–]paparatto 0 points1 point ago

I think that framing it as a need borne of human nature is a bit too deterministic. Additionally you can also say that human evolution (in the general sense) has been a product of the nuclear bomb. Humans co-constitute technology and technology co-constitutes humans (this Is why I think the notion of human nature is problematic).

[–]CharlesDingus 13 points14 points ago

What the fuck is this shit doing on the front page? Do you really think it's that simple? Do you really think that if there were no religion we wouldn't find something else to kill each other over?

[–]renwohet 0 points1 point ago

no but if you look at most of the past wars, they were caused by religious disputes. And if we had something better to fight over wouldn't you think we'd already be doing that?

[–]jkt0z 5 points6 points ago

Money is what creates the horrible events that happen around the world. Religion is merely a tool to brainwash people into soldiers. And it's by no means the only method to brainwash.

[–]science_diction 0 points1 point ago

I disagree. Scarcity creates the horrible events that happen around the world. Scarcity can be increased with human inventions such as money, but it is also naturally occuring. For all it's evils, evolution would not occur without competition for resources.

For as completely objective as I would expect r/atheism to be they seem to focus on right and wrong, good and evil, etc. more often than even the religious.

[–]jkt0z 0 points1 point ago

Well maybe money wasn't the best word. Isn't lack of money kind of the same deal as scarcity? It's the same principle anyways: be it poverty or greed both lead to bad things.

[–]sokratesz 10 points11 points ago

Imagine no reposts <empty frontpage>

[–]phoncey 4 points5 points ago

If there was no religion we would be killing each other over what brand of cereal is the best to eat, or something equally meaningless.

[–]eafkuor 4 points5 points ago

fucking enough with this shit come on

[–]hunkofmonk 3 points4 points ago

Yep, because 9/11 was a totally random, purely religion-based attack that was in no way provoked by the West.

[–]squigs 8 points9 points ago

Structural engineering was probably given a substantial push by medieval architects building those huge cathedrals. Were it not for them, we'd probably still be developing the technology for such huge structures.

[–]wasniahC 8 points9 points ago

Careful. /r/atheism doesn't like it when you sound like you attribute anything positive to religion.

[–]deadpoetic333 5 points6 points ago

It also was necessary for organizing people and providing social stability when other means of doing so would have missed the mark by far. The Great Chain of Being is a good example of providing social stability, and we can go back as far as ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia which also utilized myth to justify positions of power. People couldn't begin to imagine a world without religion, because it just wouldn't be anything like it is today.

[–]ref6738 -3 points-2 points ago

Disagree, if the church were out of the way science and engineering would have thrived long ago.

[–]science_diction 4 points5 points ago

So the Roman Empire, a theocratic Empire, didn't make any engineering marvels? Right. Okay then.

The Reinassance had absolutely no influence from religious organizations. Yup.

I often wonder, just how ignorant is the average person of their own ignorance?

[–]pornmonger 0 points1 point ago

The problem is that when people in the Western world think religion, we think the Abrahamic faiths as they are having the biggest impact on our lives.

[–]ref6738 -2 points-1 points ago

Did I ever say that they did not accomplish great feats?...no. I said they would have happened just the same without religion. Big difference.

I often wonder if people read things before they reply to them.

[–]Full_Circle -4 points-3 points ago

The bad far outweighs the good.

[–]twentyone_21 1 point2 points ago

ya lets ignore that those evil xtians ever did any science and we'll just call em bad!

[–]Taco144 1 point2 points ago

This is stupid, human ignorance is the reason religion is used for violence. If there's no religion this type of thing would still happen wether it'd be for racial regional, or social difference.

[–]ValidusVoxPopuli 1 point2 points ago

Wish I had a dollar for every time this was reposted.

[–]RedDrape 1 point2 points ago

Humans would find something different maybe even worse than current religion

[–]losermcfail 1 point2 points ago

Yes, the religion of central banking does cause emergency demolitions sometimes, when certain dominant themes require it.

Or is it that it takes some kind of religious belief system to believe in magically disappearing welded steel building cores?

[–]fugelthang 1 point2 points ago

Yeah, this is not that inspiring when you consider the insurance payoff Silverstein received.

[–]bagelpusher 1 point2 points ago

Imagine higher image quality.

[–]Mumberthrax 3 points4 points ago

This is really disgusting. 9/11 has a lot of propaganda-fueled emotionality tied to it in the USA. Most people here associate it with pure evil. All this submission is doing is piggypacking on that emotionality and directing the anger at a new target that isn't even responsible. 9/11 was not a crazy "holy" act, it was a response to complex political and military/covert actions. Usage of this image is as reprehensible and insulting to intelligence as the shit spewed by some of the worst evangelists.

[–]SovietAmerika 1 point2 points ago

Imagine the USA never funded Al-queda.

[–]science_diction 1 point2 points ago

Okay, I'm imagining no religion.

Hmm... Twin towers still gone because of an anti-western / anti-capitalist terrorist group who feel exploited and are using some other non-religious ideology to support their agenda thereby causing 9/11.

Yeah. So different. Religion is an excuse for something humans would do anyway.

[–]Repost-Rater 1 point2 points ago

This repost offers little more than obscuring the thought-provoking picture with the words already found in the title. This is not helped by the sheer frequency at which this is submitted.

Arbitrary rating: 2/5

[–]jazzcigarettes 2 points3 points ago

its easy if you try

[–]hacksoncode 0 points1 point ago

I find it's nearly impossible to imagine a world where religion never existed (humans would have to be very different beasties).

But, in particular, if there were no religion and therefore no religious persecution, the U.S. wouldn't exist in anything approaching its current form and the chance that the two towers would ever have been built in the first place is infinitesimal.

[–]elbruce 0 points1 point ago

Wow, thanks for finding this thought-provoking picture and running directly to reddit with it! We've never seen that one before!

ಠ_ಠ

[–]Freakychee 0 points1 point ago

What about all the videogames and fiction based on religon? Would I still be able to pay Diablo? Devil May Cry? Who would Master Chief fight?

For all the shit it gives us, it makes a great base for fiction because it is the most widely believed lie in the world.

[–]Walderp 0 points1 point ago

9/11 really wasn't about religion. Sure, the guys who did the bombing were probably religious extremists, but that's not why they drove a plane into the twin towers.

[–]Facker69 0 points1 point ago

If there were no religion we would be soooooo much more advanced. Just the thought of that idea, that if there were no religion and we were way more advanced than we are now pisses me off, because life would be so much better. Fuck.

[–]Syran 0 points1 point ago

And this is why as an atheist I feel the need to push myself as far away from /r/atheism as a I possibly can. You are reinforcing xenophobia in my name. You are actually worse than the fundamental Christians, who I am not associated with, because when they push a prejudice ideology it doesn't reflect back on me.

[–]GratefulZep 0 points1 point ago

It's easy if you try, No hell below us, Above us only sky

[–]runvnc 0 points1 point ago*

Imagine no propaganda and false-flag attacks.

Normally I don't post this sort of stuff on my regular account but oh well.

9/11 was a false-flag terror attack. The "news" in the United States is full of war propaganda. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays

Just about every country that becomes a headline in mainstream media is targeted by the current dominant global power structure and the "news" is just lies designed to "justify" military deployment. See KONY 2012 for the most recent popular example (didn't work this time, usually does).

War propaganda is a real part of contemporary American media and video games. Its not something that happened in the 1940s and 1950s and then stopped as soon as color television arrived.

Our media is saturated with violence, but this isn't unexpected. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_e... We are constantly at war.

We are at war right now. There is a large multi-decade (multi-century depending on how you look at it) military campaign going on in the middle east and its surrounds that most people are completely unaware of because of how powerful the grip of the propagandists is on American media.

Take a look at this map, and think back to all of the lies we have been told about the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and everywhere else.

http://www.zeemaps.com/333426 Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria. All of these countries just happen to be adjacent to eachother.

We are told that these are all noble missions, vital emergencies involving "weapons of mass destruction", or glorious democratic revolutions, and led to believe that each is basically a separate case.

The order of the invasions and other deployments across these countries and regions continues to be tactical. The motivations are many -- territory, resource control, money control, ultimately total unchallenged global domination. The lies told to justify the next step, in each case, are not very material to the actual overall mission objectives.

Afghanistan -- a foothold, limited resistance, and it was key to restore the heroin funds used to back intelligence/covert operations and establishment bank accounts.

Iraq -- A key battle, money control, resource control. Made an Iran sandwich.

Eqypt / Libya

February 21, 1987

Early last year, President Reagan approved a secret directive under which United States military forces would support Egypt in the event of a ''pre-emptive'' attack on Libya...

...In March 1986, the semiofficial Egyptian newspaper Al Ahram said Cairo had rejected three requests from American delegations for joint military action against Libya...

...But several Administration officials who support President Reagan's policy on Libya insisted today that the meeting with President Mubarak and the subsequent planning were not an attempt to press Cairo to invade.

http://www.nytimes.com/1987/02/21/world/egypt-us-plan-to-rai...

In April 2011, Mubarak was removed from power by a "democratic uprising" and by July rumors circulated that he was "in a coma".

Also in July 2011, "Libya Rebels" get formal backing by the United States and $30 billion. Within a relatively short period of time Qaddafi was killed. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/16/world/africa/16libya.html?...

Syria -- A key strategic ally of Iran, tactical position.

http://www.almc.army.mil/images/unified-command_world-map.jpg

[–]SuperXpio 0 points1 point ago

If there was no religion there would be a lot more/bigger buildings. Or maybe we would have just destroyed ourselves over something else.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Upvoted for nationalism in the United States.

[–]AThinker661 0 points1 point ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p5jnqEyUs4 This is how it will look without religion.

[–]CyricTheMad 0 points1 point ago

People would still find reasons to be shitty to one another. Religion just gives the bigots justification for their behaviour.

[–]Strudol 0 points1 point ago

oddly, "imagine all the people " just popped into my head....am i the only one?

[–]JTown91 0 points1 point ago

imagine no gravity yo - we could fly

[–]indignant_dude 0 points1 point ago

We'd still kill each other, though, right?

[–]lilkidbro 0 points1 point ago

As much as I'd like to, I just don't agree with the implied message. I'm no humanist (from a psychological standpoint at least), so I think that people will find any reason just to kill each other. If they didn't fall in 2001 then they would've fallen some other time.

[–]bigbangbilly 0 points1 point ago

Unless there is a time machine trying to get that might not be a good idea as it may turn some of us into hypocrite.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

imagine no CIA

[–]johnnynutman 0 points1 point ago

without religion we'd only have wars because of ethnic differences, territorial differences and wealth.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

OP is an ass. Being from NYC a lot of my family members we're caught in nine eleven. Lemme give you the current situation of one (a survivor) she is a catholic. She is also severely crippled with multiple sclerosis. she is also gay and her partner is also catholic and was also caught in the towers (she worked there) they are still Faithful Catholics.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Imagine, no planes.

[–]unsalvageable 0 points1 point ago

Imagine no religion ? That's not possible.

I could act like a beauty queen contestant, and dream of a world where humans have evolved beyond greed and vanity and resentment; but that's kind of ludicrous.

Religion is imaginary, right ? We imagined it into existence. Why did we do that? Why did every culture on earth 'evolve' a system of supernatural explanations.? More important - why do we keep the old lies ? Confronted with the monstrous superiority of science, why do old fools still pray to an empty space ?

Human imagination is the currency of science and religion both. They are fraternal twins, carried by the same gene. And neither will ever die. As long as we continue to have human imagination, we will have science; and we will have religion, too.

[–]jerolelmerol[!] 0 points1 point ago

religion didnt build the planes, did it?

[–]scottles 0 points1 point ago

Religion is a disease of man. It's based on fear and can and has done great harm. One day ALL religions will be seen for what they always were Man Made Myths. They come not out of love but out of the worst in man and the sooner we grow out of this the better.

[–]MRLINDAN 0 points1 point ago

TELL THAT TO THE FUCKIN EXTREAMEST MUSLIMS WHO MURDERED 3000 FUCKIN AMERICANS, AND I BELEIVE SOME OF THOSE FUCKIN PEOPLE PRAYED BEFORE THEY FLUNG THEMSELVES TO THEIR DEATHS!!! THIS IS WHY WE WANT OUR COUNTRY TO BE FREE SO YOU CAN BELEIVE IN WHAT YOU WANT SO QUIT TRYING TO BLAME ALL RELIGIONS ON JUST ONE. 9/11 WAS NOT A FUCKIN RALLING CRY FOR FUCKIN ATHEISTS!!!

[–]S_Dub7 0 points1 point ago

I think the new caption should be, "Imagine no science" Firstly there would be no picture or buildings. I like to imagine religion as people sitting in a dark cave, furiously raping little children and telling each other they can't go outside, stop raping or talk about anything else or they'll suffer forever when they're done raping young boys. I'm glad I'm an athiest; and can use my brain.

[–]gamerlen 0 points1 point ago

Um... Lest we forget America was founded by british puritans who fled England to escape religious persecution.

If there was no religion the World Trade Center, New York City, and perhaps America as we know it may never have existed at all.

[–]speednugget 0 points1 point ago

It's easy if you try.

[–]Insanity_Troll 0 points1 point ago

Imagine no reposts......

[–]PerthroXIII 0 points1 point ago

Imagine no politics; Imagine no George Bush

FTFY

9/11 was a controlled explosion. No building of that size will collapse from a meek airplane

[–]TreyGarcia 0 points1 point ago

IMO, there's a solid argument that religion had no part whatsoever in the 9/11 attacks. I'm pretty sure it was 100% greed, dressed-up as a terrorist attack. These type of images are proof that the tactic worked beautifully.

[–]packerbacker1221 1 point2 points ago

What was greedy about it?

[–]TreyGarcia -1 points0 points ago

As they say in the movies: 'follow the money'. I'm no wingnut conspiracy theorist at all, but I have plenty of common sense and a generous helping of skepticism. If you believe that building #7 was expertly demolished then let common sense figure out the rest. Also, if you don't think your government could be involved in something so insidiously evil, then you should have a closer look at their track record.

[–]packerbacker1221 0 points1 point ago

Where was money gained through the attacks? Also, America has a nasty track record, but you'd be hard-pressed to find a nation that hasn't committed disgusting acts somewhere in its past, especially one the size of America.

[–]SS_material -1 points0 points ago

*Imagine no idiotic radicals in religious groups

Much better.

I mean, what would this world be without religion? Be honest now. BE HONEST. Think about it. What would we not have, if it weren't for religion? Now also think back towards to the times where the Egyptians built the Pyramids. Who did they worship? A god. What if they didn't?

Does anyone see my point here? If so, would you like to explain it better than me..I'm not that great at it..