Honestly, I really have no idea what you're talking about here. You don't seem to have a coherent point or argument which I have not yet addressed.

I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings, but I feel that you think i'm trying to say something that I was not saying. No reason to be a dick.

So. You use a fundamentally flawed argument in order to help give perspective to an improper and fundamentally ignorant view of your beliefs in order to clarify them?

To address the part about hurting your feelings, I was merely questioning and confirming that you use an example of polyatheism. Let me explain the above statement a bit: "So. You use this method you described with the intent to help other people (who hold theistic beliefs, many of whom often have a tendency to be ignorant of your own beliefs), in hopes of allowing them a glimpse of what your beliefs actually are."

Though, however, a problem arises. You then claim that are not here in defense of, or use, polyatheism. You've given some misinformation, then, as I am confused to why you were here in the first place.

I came here specifically to downvote this argument...

So you came here with the express purpose to downvote the comment made my SpasmodiusDent. After stating the above, you then state,

...because I like to use the argument....

So you came here with the express purpose to shoot down the idea that polyatheism is not an actual thing and that it is merely atheism (which is the summation of SpadmodiusDent's argument). You did this because you like to use a specific method (which you describe) to help explain your own beliefs to others who do not understand them.

So if I still follow, you came here to tell someone they were wrong about polyatheism because you like to use a specific argument to help your own case. So because you are defending polyatheism here (due to your argument), then there must be some sort of correlation between your argument and polyatheism.

However, you then state the following:

...but you seem to think that I irrationally argue for (or about) polyatheism.. I do not.

Well, your self-proclaimed reason for commenting was, as further above, to downvote the argument that polyatheism is not an actual concept. You then completely contradict yourself by claiming that you are not defending polyatheism. So then why did you downvote and argue against SpasmodiusDent? Because of this fundamental contradiction in your own argument, your argument is flawed and incoherent. Why, truly, are you here then?

You also claim that I irrationally argue that this is what you are doing, however I provide evidence contrary to your new claim.

Also, in regards to the second part of your previous post: I understand why you use that method in which to try to help people understand where you are coming from. I don't believe I ever gave any reason to doubt otherwise. I even went on to say,

Well, if it works, then more power to you. But using the example that a theist does not believe in all gods does not demonstrate Polyatheism because it is not Polyatheism.

Let me explain what I am saying here. I commend you for your success in explaining to others. I then try to make a point about the inherent contradiction in your argument; that is, to point out that you have made a stand in direct opposition SpasmodiusDent's argument. I proceed to question how this stance, if at all, demonstrates or can help to persuade others against SpadmodiusDent's argument.

It demonstrates an aspect of Theist (choosing which deities you believe actually exist) and relates it to atheism so that may better understand your beliefs (that is, that you have chosen no deities). It finds common ground that is commonly overlooked (that you both have chosen to believe in a certain number of deities, just that your numbers vary) in order to explain something more clearly to someone. This still does no demonstrate (and is not an example of) Polyatheism.

I then go on to break down what is you are actually doing when you explain to others your own beliefs using your own method. I point out that your stance against polyatheism is not at all related to method with which you persuade others and help them to understand your own beliefs.

However, your initial stance was for polyatheism. Your stance and the presentation of your method of persuasion inherently created a correlation between your argument and your stance for polyatheism. After pointing out that your stance (having come here for the express purpose of opposing the idea that polyatheism is not a concept -- which by nature, if I may refresh our memories, is the same as a stance FOR polyatheism) is not related to your reason (the because), I then reiterate my previous argument; that your argument in no way actually is for polyatheism.

If your argument is in no way for Polyatheism, yet you came here for Polyatheism, then I do not understand why you came here at all. Your argument makes no sense. It has nothing to do with anything SpasmodiusDent said. It has nothing to do with polyatheism, which I tried to explain. Therefore, your opposition to SpasmodiusDent makes no sense. And I feel you owe SpasmodiusDent an apology for being a dick to him (which you admit to in your own reply to him) for coming here with the express purpose to downvote him and to be a dick to him.

I never said your method of helping others to understand your own views was wrong. I even commended them. I never insulted you. I only pointed out the flaws in your argument in order to try to better understand what was going on, and I tried my best to explain the position that myself and SpasmodiusDent took.

However, next time, before you get angry and start cursing at people, go off to play the victim (claiming that you have been offended), or talking down to someone and mocking them, I would whole-heartedly suggest that you invest in a remedial reading course, a college freshman writing course, a college freshman communications course, or all of the above. That way you can not only better understand what people are trying to say to you, but also you will be able to better communicate your own ideas and arguments so that others may understand you. But I forgive you. Keep fighting the good fight. Good day.