this post was submitted on
1,325 points (52% like it)
12,081 up votes 10,756 down votes

pics

subscribe2,276,033 readers

11,138 users here now

Looking for an image subreddit with minimal rules? Check out /r/images

A place to share interesting photographs and pictures. Feel free to post your own, but please read the rules first (see below), and note that we are not a catch-all for general images (of screenshots, comics, etc.)

Spoiler code

Please mark spoilers like this:
[text here](/spoiler)

Hover over to read.

Rules

  1. No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, info-graphics and most diagrams. Text (e.g. a URL) serving to credit the original author is exempt.

  2. No gore or porn. NSFW content must be tagged.

  3. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking & harassment will not be tolerated.

  4. No solicitation of votes (including "cake day" posts), posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor, or [FIXED] posts. DAE posts go in /r/DoesAnybodyElse. "Fixed" posts should be added as a comment to the original image.

  5. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to an image hosting website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

  • If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don't delete it as that just makes the filter hate you!

  • If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it!

Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichés/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning.

Links

If your post doesn't meet the above rules, consider submitting it on one of these other subreddits:

Comics  
/r/comics /r/webcomics
/r/vertical /r/f7u12
/r/ragenovels /r/AdviceAtheists
Image macros Screenshots/text
/r/lolcats /r/screenshots
/r/AdviceAnimals /r/desktops
/r/Demotivational /r/facepalm (Facebook)
/r/reactiongifs /r/DesktopDetective
Wallpaper Animals
/r/wallpaper /r/aww
/r/wallpapers /r/cats
The SFWPorn Network /r/TrollingAnimals
  /r/deadpets
  /r/birdpics
  /r/foxes
Photography Un-moderated pics
/r/photography /r/AnythingGoesPics
/r/photocritique /r/images
/r/HDR
/r/windowshots
/r/PictureChallenge
Misc New reddits
/r/misc /r/britpics
/r/gifs Imaginary Network
/r/dataisbeautiful /r/thennnow
/r/picrequests /r/SpecArt
  /r/LookWhoIMet
  /r/timelinecovers
  /r/MemesIRL
  /r/OldSchoolCool
  /r/photoshopbattles

Also check out http://irc.reddit.com

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 228

[–]Aww_Shucks 171 points172 points ago

http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/rashad-alakbarov-paints-with-shadows-and-lights/

Rashad Alakbarov from Azerbaijan uses suspended translucent objects and other found materials to create light and shadow paintings on walls. The jaw-dropping light painting above, made with an array of colored airplanes is currently on view at the Fly to Baku exhibition at De Pury Gallery in London through January 29th.

http://i.imgur.com/sF9L5.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/CqDW2.jpg

:)

[–]Sir_Cut 10 points11 points ago

Upboats for verification!!

[–]Buckaletta 1 point2 points ago

Thanks for the info!

[–]presidentender 318 points319 points ago

That art for which the medium is human cleverness is the most pleasing art of all.

[–]Dsilkotch 50 points51 points ago

I'm totally going to quote you when I steal this image to share on FB. Hope that's okay.

[–]presidentender 57 points58 points ago

-presidentender

[–]Dsilkotch 32 points33 points ago

I...I didn't credit your username, sorry. It seemed like a redundant form of anonymity. But I did put it in quotation marks, to show that it was borrowed cleverness.

[–]presidentender 52 points53 points ago

Now how will I make my internet username get famous?

[–]Dsilkotch 18 points19 points ago

I will go back and credit you if you like. Seriously. Is "presidentender" the name you want me to use?

[–]presidentender 51 points52 points ago

Yes. Also it doesn't matter and I am trying to have fun with you.

[–]Dsilkotch 35 points36 points ago

Oh. Sorry. I've spent the past three days embroiled in a Facebook debate (my first mistake, I know) about the proposed healthcare law that would make providing contraceptives a standard part of healthcare coverage. I've been trying to explain that no, it doesn't mean that Obama is trying to swoop in and unilaterally seize control of the Catholic church's policies. As you can imagine, my exposure to this debate has seriously compromised my ability to discern satire from genuine moral outrage. I'll show myself out now.

[–]DontRedditAtWork 15 points16 points ago

great conversation, would read again

[–]presidentender 28 points29 points ago

It doesn't help that this thread is not particularly funny, either.

[–]GeneralWarts 19 points20 points ago

Don't sell yourself short. I very much enjoyed this double act. Dsilkotch played a great straight man. I half expected you to get more needy after he asked you to confirm the name to use.

Alas, it's probably best for Dsilkotch's sanity that you put an end to it.

[–]purple_ink 6 points7 points ago

I'm highly amused, but I'm also sitting in a cubicle soo...

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points ago

Let's focus on the art here people....

[–]joeanon 0 points1 point ago

Just pick a name that's already famous and register it like everyone else.

[–]Xen0nex 0 points1 point ago*

Yes, this part is important. It's part of his plan to sway public political opinion, with the help of his sockpuppet account, presidentpeter, into eventually becoming ruler of Earth. Way to screw up his plan, Dsilotch.

[–]seekhappiness 0 points1 point ago

Change your name to andrewsmith1986

[–]Aelfhere 0 points1 point ago

I tagged you as "Trying to be a big deal on the internet".

I will help you when I can.

[–]captainAwesomePants 2 points3 points ago

Not crediting presidentender for this reason is like not crediting Batman for saving the day.

[–]prezjordan 0 points1 point ago

You're president too? Awesome!

[–]GrandChawhee 0 points1 point ago

Are you a president bartender?

[–]anthereddit 2 points3 points ago

He's actually the brother of the Hegemon and the destroyer of the Formics. First and only mentor of Bean the Giant.

[–]softmod 4 points5 points ago

That really is an eloquent quote

[–]presidentender 1 point2 points ago

Thank you.

[–]Second_Foundationeer 1 point2 points ago

Are you prsident ender.. like president wiggin? Because that's a president i can get behind (insert pedo joke)

[–]maccron 1 point2 points ago

Wait..? You're not allowed out of r/guns. Also, go back to being a dick.

[–]presidentender 1 point2 points ago

I am not a dick so much as a curmudgeon, in love with the sound of my own voice and too impressed with the value of my own intelligence.

[–]Toxication 0 points1 point ago

That right there is just as quotable as- and perhaps even more than- the quote from which this thread grew. You're like the lovechild of Gandhi and Kipling... but with a gun. Truly a wondrous combination.

[–]maccron 0 points1 point ago

Niggard.

[–]presidentender 0 points1 point ago

Nay faith, sir! If anything I am too free with my knowledge and my funds, granting the former to those who have no desire for it and frittering away the latter on hopeless "charities" of dubious value.

[–]maccron 0 points1 point ago

I like this side of you. It's as if you lower your enemy's defenses and lure them in with your sweet words then shoot them in the face when they least expect it. I bet you use an sr9c to do the deed.

[–]presidentender 0 points1 point ago

Not so much, no.

I seem like a dick in /r/guns because there is so much stupidity, so much pride in stupidity, and so much refusal to learn.

[–]maccron 0 points1 point ago

Which reminds me, because of you I have gone from wanting to buy an sr9c to wanting to buy a cz-85b. I'm guessing that's a step in a better direction.

[–]presidentender 0 points1 point ago

It is indeed; thank you for telling me. Think about one of the CZ-75 decockers models.

[–]maccron 0 points1 point ago

I think I understand the benefit of a decocker model but being a lefty, the ambidextrous model seems convenient. Unfortunately they don't have an ambi with a decocker. At least not that I know of. I guess the question I have to ask myself is if the function of the decocker and lack of safety outweigh the convenience of the ambidextrous controls. Could you as a right handed shooter handle a gun properly if it had only left hand controls? Obviously I want to try the different models out but there aren't any ranges or gun shops with any on hand.

[–]dressedAsDog 1 point2 points ago*

Nice wording, but isn't that true with all art? Or, everything ever created?

edit: spelling.

[–]raylinth 23 points24 points ago

Artist: Rashad Alakbarov More here

[–]DontTagMeBro 1 point2 points ago

As cool as this is, the same question keeps popping into my mind as I see 90% of the posts in this subreddit: "Is this really design, or is it art?" In my view, this is art, because it serves no other purpose than looking cool.

[–]overtoke 4 points5 points ago

it's both

[–]simplystunned 0 points1 point ago

Art can be functional. Think of pottery or fused glass dishes for starters. Lighting is often functional art; Tiffany is a prime example.

[–]redwall_hp 0 points1 point ago

Design is functional art.

[–]celestialwolf 16 points17 points ago

Shitty_watercolor: your work is cut out for you here. Go! Go! Go!

[–]wasting_internet 6 points7 points ago

take that, Chihuly.

[–]xxvmarcvxx 0 points1 point ago

No doubt this is very cool, but for the record there's a Chihuly museum by me and that stuff is unbelievable.

[–]goatfucker9000 1 point2 points ago

a lot of glass blowers think chihuly is a hack because he doesn't actually make anything any more. he has his apprentices make all of the glassware and then just coordinates the arrangement at the installation.

[–]wasting_internet 3 points4 points ago

He sure knows how to capitalize in the gift shop, though.

[–]xxvmarcvxx 0 points1 point ago

This is true, they even made me make my own. It's still cool stuff though.

http://www.moreanartscenter.org/content.php?id=55

[–]Padiddle 0 points1 point ago

A lot of famous artists don't actually do the labor and use apprentices. The artist is still directing the vision much like a movie director "directs" a movie. It's still his artistic vision and thus he gets the credit.

[–]iBeenie 0 points1 point ago

I understand how it can seem to be less meaningful/personal since he isn't crafting it himself, but his approach isn't focused on the individual pieces but how they all work together. He does oversee much of the glass blowing, but his art is looking at the big picture and it really is magnificent to see in real life. He's working on a different level, like the conductor of an orchestra.

[–]BurritoFueled 0 points1 point ago

Your wife's college glass blowing professor does not equal "a lot of glass blowers."

Also, Chihuly is blind in one eye (thus the eye patch) and has a fucked up shoulder--preventing him from doing his own work. Tell all those imaginary detractors to inform themselves.

[–]hjf11393 12 points13 points ago

Second time it has been posted here...and neither time did they give the original artist credit ಠ_ಠ

[–]Snowbank_Lake 55 points56 points ago

See, now THAT is modern art I can appreciate. I hate going into the modern section of a museum, and there's just a pile of junk there that doesn't look like anything, but that's only because "you like, totally just don't get it man..."

[–]Kache 2 points3 points ago*

Well, I'd say there could very easily be merit that's just very far removed. My guess is that a lot of that modern art is basically like internet memes. Some things are rehashes of rehashes, which could very well be brilliant in context, but are completely meaningless without the deep history of contexts and culture.

Unfortunately, if that's really the case, it seems like nobody thought of including that context under the art piece's description.

edit
for example, a meaningless picture without context

[–]JonnyTHM 1 point2 points ago

Well THAT's the longest thread I've ever seen.

[–]Kache 1 point2 points ago*

There are longer ones, by far.

edit
see

[–]penguinv 0 points1 point ago

omg s/he explains!!
(in the link, hohoho)

[–]Beakerbite 1 point2 points ago

Reddit and RES were not prepared for that. I don't know how many times I had to click to continue.

[–]penguinv 0 points1 point ago

This is why they dont: a. it dont pay. b. it's like explaining a joke. it only annoys the joker.

[–]SpaceMantis 14 points15 points ago

Even worse, the pretentious douches who pretend like they get it.

"Wow, simply brilliant. Obviously the artist is using the junk as a metaphor here for the increasing attitudes of acceptance toward wastefulness in a modern society. Absolutely amazing."

If it's in a museum people are going to assume it's profound just because they spent money to get into the museum. Sometimes I wonder if those artists are really just huge trolls.

[–]jlobes 6 points7 points ago

Watch "Exit Through The Gift Shop"

[–]Ingenium21 2 points3 points ago

That movie is good, but it's more about how people bought into a whole shit load of hype because the guy knew Banksy, besides, he may have been derivative but that doesn't mean he couldn't eventually become good at it, that's the whole point of art, it's subjective. Banksy came off as a bit of a dick in that movie, because he came off as saying only a select, talented few could be real artists. He may as well have just sucked off Ayn Rand while he was at it.

[–]jlobes 8 points9 points ago

Watch it again, Brainwash really never pimps his connection to Banksy, the only connection they ever have to one another that's really publicized is the quote used to promote Brainwash's show.

What I took from the film is a criticism of the pop art scene, emphasizing that since its members are so pretentious and clueless it was only a matter of time until the artists became equally pretentious and clueless.

And in my opinion Banksy was spot on in that film. He didn't resent Brainwash making mediocre art, after all it was Banksy who first encouraged Brainwash to make art, but Banksy was disappointed that so many people embraced such mediocre and mass-produced work, and how quickly Brainwash was to aggressively commercialize his art.

[–]clintisiceman 6 points7 points ago*

Both of you sound like willfully ignorant douchebags. Just because you don't get it or can't appreciate it doesn't mean its automatically bullshit and that the artists and art appreciators are phony jerks who are just "pretending to get it."

EDIT: Some guy refers to all people who like modern art as "douches" - LOL UPVOTES

Someone calls him out for insulting people based on a silly uninformed opinion - NO. NOT LOL

This is the shit that I left digg to get away from four years ago. Enjoy your completely mindless and embarrassingly stupid anti-art circlejerk.

[–]steve_b 7 points8 points ago

Here's my beef: The mission of a museum should be, among other things, to educate people as to why the what they feature is important. This is true of art museums, science museums, vacuum cleaner museums, whatever. Simply just putting a bunch of stuff in a room with with no context does nothing to spread knowledge or appreciation of the material to those who are not already in the loop.

So you accuse these guys of being willfully ignorant douchebags; wouldn't visiting a museum be one of the logical places to enlighten onesself, particularly for contemporary art styles like installations? Yet virtually every modern (and classic, usually) art museum I've ever visited typically has just a tiny placard with the name of the piece, a date and the name of the artist. If you're really lucky, you'll get some obtuse paragraph full of weasel-words and nearly meaningless sentences "exploring the complexity" of the piece.

Isn't this a huge lost opportunity? Shouldn't an art museum be doing everything they can to explain why a piece is imporant, or why a style matters? People complain that there is no appreciation for art in society at large, yet the purveyors of that art seem to be happy to keep the unwashed masses in the dark. Either that, or the emperor really doesn't have any clothes.

[–]clintisiceman 2 points3 points ago

This is a fine point, though I don't think it really has anything to do with what I said. My comment was in defense of artists and appreciators of the arts, not museums. I actually agree that art museums could generally do more to enrich people's understanding of art and the importance of artistic movements and styles beyond simply displaying them. They can be pretty alienating places to people without much prior knowledge of what they're seeing. But that doesn't mean that these ignorant yokels slagging off art on the internet can't bother to educate themselves before they announce their shitty opinions to the world.

[–]steve_b 1 point2 points ago

I think my point and yours are closely related (otherwise I would have responded to a different post!). From the perspective of an outsider, those who run the museum and those who stand in front of the works stroking their chins and spouting vague pronouncements are cut from the same cloth - both represent people who presumably know why these works are worthy, but can't be bothered to enlighten the "ignorant yokels".

The main point of the post you responded to was "Even worse, the pretentious douches who pretend like they get it." Note he didn't say everyone who enjoys art is a douche - just the ones who pretend they get it. And those people certainly exist. If you have no clue as to why one piece is great and another is crap, how are you to differentiate between the douche and the expert?

Most other fields requiring specialized knowledge have a popularizers among their ranks to try and spread the word why their domain is important, but considering how long art has been part of our culture (existence of art pretty much defines culture), it has mostly been treated as something that separates the worthy people from the unworthy. The cynical side of me also figures that there are strong financial interests for keeping the public largely ignorant of what constitutes "good" art: the art gallery industry probably owes most of its revenue to those who lack taste but not wealth.

[–]Snowbank_Lake 1 point2 points ago

You're making my point better than I was able to... lol. It's true-- I was not trying to say that all art is bad. I truly enjoy a good trip to the museum. I was just saying what my problem was with the attitude there seems to be in more contemporary art, and you summed it up nicely... Sometimes it kind of feels like an exclusive club, and they tell you how little you know, but won't actually take the time to explain it to you. And no, not ALL people who enjoy contemporary art are like that.

[–]penguinv 0 points1 point ago

Snowbank_Lake some museums do it so much better than others. There's more of a trend to have explanatory material but it's mostly history and ingroup stuff rather than an aesthetic experience. You have to reach and get lucky and some of that famous stuff just is not worth it IMHO.

But in high school I would go downtown where they had 2 rooms of just Degas and I would tingle inside.

YMMV

Also I've seen helpful to art understanding exhibits in a museum of natural history, and at the exploratorium in SF. dunno where you are.

I'll do what I can if you want to have a conversation about it. Look at my posts in this thread and see if you like me. Peaceout.

[–]bluespottedtail 1 point2 points ago

Amen. I'm sure you're already subscribed but head on over to r/contemporaryart. :)

[–]Snowbank_Lake 2 points3 points ago

lol, I'm an ignorant douchebag for having an opinion you disagree with? Oh, how dare I!

[–]suddenly_pinkie_pie 5 points6 points ago

You intimated that those who thought that 'piles of junk' as artwork were holding an illegitimate and pretentious viewpoint.

Clintisiceman then proceeded to point out that while they might come across as pretentious, you come across as willfully ignorant (different than ignorant), as you expressed a lack of interest in even attempting to understand the ideas the artist might be attempting to convey.

Personally, there is some modern art I like, and there is some contemporary art I like. On the other hand, there is some that I don't at all.

I think clintisiceman is suggesting that your dismissal of modern art (or maybe you mean contemporary art?) as a whole, and all mediums associated with it, is indeed willfully ignorant.

Whether or not you're a douchebag is debatable, and would largely be based on the civility of your responses to contradictions in your own beliefs. If you react with immediate anger and dismissal at view points opposing your own, then yes, you are likely a douchebag. On the other hand, if you genuinely consider the ideas of others (even without accepting them), then to describe you as a douchebag would be unfair.

That said, I think the douchebag part was more directed at spacemantis, who took your original statement to a further level. Moreover, it appears spacemantis is unaware of Pop Art, particularly the work of Andy Warhol, who was undeniably and completely an artist troll.

So yeah. Artists, particularly contemporary ones, are trolls of a sort-- in the truest sense. They express controversial ideas using controversial methods in the hope of causing discourse. This same principle held true for, say, the Impressionists.

Whether or not you regard a medium as a valid medium doesn't change that there are people out there who regard it as such. clintisiceman perhaps felt judged by your categorization of all such art so dismissively.

No matter what the issue, come from wherever you please; all this fighting gets you nothing (but hoof and mouth disease.) Arguing's not the way. Hey, come out and play! It's a shiny, new day; so, what do you say? You gotta share, you gotta care. It's the right thing to do. You gotta share, you gotta care... and there'll always be a way through.

[–]Snowbank_Lake 1 point2 points ago

I appreciate your comment. Unfortunately I'm not at home right now so I don't have time to type out something nearly as well thought-out. But I see what you're saying and I feel bad if anything I said sounded more negative than I intended. Modern art isn't my thing, obviously. My opinion, as I state below, is that I don't like the idea that it doesn't matter if it makes sense to anyone else as long as the artist likes it. I enjoy older art, such as portraits, because as soon as you look at it you know what it is and what story it tells. Throwing some stuff together in a way that makes sense to no one but the artist, to me, isn't as enjoyable. I think people got upset because I used the word "junk." I wasn't calling the artwork junk... I meant that sometimes it is literally junk (piles of trash, shapeless scraps of metal) that is used, and I don't quite get what the message is.

Anyway, all I did was state my opinion, and I don't want people to get all worked up over it because it's not like I'm petitioning to have modern art exhibits removed. I just said I don't like it.

[–]penguinv 1 point2 points ago

upvote. s/he's clear. explaining hir taste. what's not to like about the parent post to this.

Snowbank_lake kudos. One day there will be one you will like, you wont think it's art but you'll like it for some sense of play or something.

art travels in different realms and what you see and value in the older stuff just is not there in the newer stuff. And, some artists are trolls and fwiw I think some museum/critic nabobs are too. And then there is "follow the money" and "who do they party with"?

Shrug. You are so right. And maybe I dont either. How much tony smith and mark di suever can I see before ... I just wonder. But richard serra's work is fantastic, ominous, physically present. (and recently saw a video set in a place with lots of mark di suevero and it seemed to highlight some "feeling" in the landscape. Or I'm just used to it.

Most of the public scupture in WLA is blaaa. And how much of it is in the shape of the letter C? Or did the question stem from sculpture in Chicago? So boring.

So these may not be the bad art, err "literally junk (piles of trash, shapeless scraps of metal) " but it is modern art.

Excuse the blabla. I'm still deeply into "morning mind".

[–]clintisiceman 2 points3 points ago*

Your opinion is uninformed and yet you are sounding off about it like you are some sort of authority, referring to artists' works as "piles of junk" without even really thinking about them at all, so I would say yes.

[–]penguinv 0 points1 point ago

yes men sound like they are some kind of authority sometime. Like you say s/he didnt really think about them at all.

S/he didnt claim to be informed. I infer that you do. I am informed (degrees in art baby!) and I had an entirely different take on snowbank_lake OOPS you were replying to someone else and here I am touting my considered response that was all about opening hir (himandher) up to the experience of something modern but better than those piles of randomly welded metal. Man I so prefer Ant Farm's "Cadillac Ranch" to those things.

/me looks up and sees you did respond to S...Lake and says, oh wankericeman. shrug.

[–]tyme 1 point2 points ago

Don't museums usually have older (classic/historic) art, while more current art is showcased in art galleries?

Just curious.

[–]clintisiceman 7 points8 points ago

There are museums for contemporary art too.

[–]tyme 2 points3 points ago

I see...I guess I just always think of museums as being for historical things, like egyptian mummies and shit.

[–]MentalRaid 2 points3 points ago

upvoted for:

"mummies and shit"

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points ago

In my experience, the people who bash modern arts are way more pretentious than those that like it. You don't like it? That's fine. Don't shit all over people that do find value and joy in it, even if you don't like it. That's perfectly fine that you hate it, but that doesn't mean everyone has to.

[–]Snowbank_Lake -1 points0 points ago

I'm not complaining because I don't like it... my issue is that I feel like art is one of the few places where you don't have to be good at it because you can just claim it meant something to you and no one else has to get it. The same argument wouldn't work for something like singing... just because someone enjoys singing doesn't mean they are good. And just because someone drew something doesn't automatically make it museum-worthy. But that seems to be the argument with modern art, kind of like how everybody who plays the game gets a trophy so no one feels left out.

[–]nazdorovia 1 point2 points ago

I think people assume that art is supposed to be accessible for some reason. John Waters summed it up better than I could when he said "contemporary art’s job is to wreck whatever came before it. And from the very beginning after the Old Masters, from then on, each generation wrecked that. [..]

"most people have great contempt about contemporary art and I find that hilarious because I did a piece, it said "contemporary art hates you." And it does hate them because you can’t see it. You don’t know the magic trick; you haven’t learned the vocabulary, you haven’t learned the special way of seeing something that changes it."

http://bigthink.com/ideas/24050 full interview here if you're interested.

[–]Snowbank_Lake 1 point2 points ago

To be honest, I'm a little bit confused by the point he's making... lol. Care to put it in layman's terms for me? :-P

[–]penguinv 0 points1 point ago

dont worry. find some art that appeals to you and go from there.

there must be something about art that draws you or you'd be somewhere else on reddit. See?


I'm listening to Waters now. He's talking about taste as a learned phenomenon. It's a culture. There's cultures all over.

Water's point... he's got a lot of them. Mostly it's about him, liking him. About art in the beginning his point is that the goals of modern art is different than older art. I'd agree if you say some modern art. And it's not just the deconstructionists. Meanwhile note that I made the same point to you in some other response in this whole discussion.

The art piece he mentions that is toxic.. that's brilliant. IT's the tension of opposites. It's not about beauty of the piece. It's a conceptual piece and what it does is destroy the "meaning" of the art market. It only has the stature to do so because other works of hers are valued by the market. She's thumbing her nose at the market like John Waters is thumbing his nose at the world. I see why he likes it.

OK I dont want to lay you man but these are my terms. Have I endeared myself to you?

tl;dr; art >> words. morning mind. nice sunny day.

[–]penguinv 0 points1 point ago

upvote for waters

[–]bluespottedtail 0 points1 point ago*

There's a difference between conceptual skill and technical skill, friend. There is a place for both, don't dismiss one or the other. On top of that, what it means to draw has changed(at least by postmodernist standards). Art has to evolve. If it stayed the same it would not be socially or culturally relevant. Each movement has its own historical context that fits the issues and concerns of the time and it changes to reflect that. You don't have to like it. Just realize that it does have societal worth.

[–]penguinv 0 points1 point ago

lots of people get left out.

[–]i4ybrid 0 points1 point ago

Does this mean I like art? I'm so conflicted!

[–]cybaritic 23 points24 points ago

Refractions.

ftfy

[–]Suudsu 10 points11 points ago

Selective light wavelength transmissions

FTFY

[–]CaptinPlanted 6 points7 points ago

Yea, shadows?

[–]bobthemighty_ 0 points1 point ago

It's more absorption of some of the light is the glass than specifically refraction.

[–]GotBetterThingsToDo 2 points3 points ago

Has anyone ever translucented so far as ever to need more to do look more like?

[–]bobthemighty_ 1 point2 points ago

Yes.

[–]GotBetterThingsToDo 0 points1 point ago

We have a winner! :)

[–]savemejebus321 81 points82 points ago

repostingest repost of all reposts

[–]g0ing2f4st 20 points21 points ago

Yeah its kinda a shameless repost with no credit to the artist

[–]DoctorYuyi 2 points3 points ago

The OP probably didn't even know.

[–]nightfan 0 points1 point ago

Yeah right.

[–]prezjordan 37 points38 points ago

Literally never seen this. And I barely leave reddit.

[–]vagrantwade 11 points12 points ago

[–]xXSanityXx 3 points4 points ago

TIL I was in a coma last month.

[–]vagrantwade 1 point2 points ago

I got your back.

[–]Hellhunter120 0 points1 point ago

Likewise

[–]algebraic94 11 points12 points ago

I know, this was literally on here a month ago. Who is upvoting this stuff?

[–]n8dom 9 points10 points ago

I guess there will never be an end to those who complain about reposts. Just because it was on the front page of reddit a month ago does not mean I had a lunch break during that time to catch it.

[–]stevesonaplane 5 points6 points ago

It doesn't credit the artist either. That's a big no no. I don't mind reposts.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]n8dom 2 points3 points ago

I don't know why you were downvoted for this, but I will go down with you man. Reposts happen.

[–]McBurger -1 points0 points ago

Well, me originally, but I check the comments on every post I view. Upvote redacted and reversed.

[–]Lizowa 0 points1 point ago

No only has this been reposted, I specifically remember it being front page during the SOPA fiasco, an in the screenshot of reddit that was featured on all the news channels, so even non redditors have seen it.

[–]Buckaletta -4 points-3 points ago

I've never seen this on here and I enjoy it... so I like that it has been posted again. Having comments mentioning that something is a repost is far more annoying than something being reposted, in my opinion. The little arrows next to the post are there for a reason.

[–]savemejebus321 5 points6 points ago

so i can downvote reposts right?

[–]HappySuckMyDickDay 1 point2 points ago

I concur. People pointing out that its a repost kills it for the people who have never seen it before.

[–]cooleststoryout 20 points21 points ago

I smell a repost

[–]attilad 3 points4 points ago

Wow, where is this?

[–]Sect312 2 points3 points ago

This must have been frustrating as hell to make.

[–]Suudsu 3 points4 points ago

How enlightening.

[–]godsdead 13 points14 points ago

Reposting repost

[–]ViaRoarUgh 2 points3 points ago*

This is awesome, sets as desktop background

Edit: fuck it looks horrible now.

[–]Snowbank_Lake 0 points1 point ago

Yeah I wanted to do that too, but it's too small and not the right width :-(

[–]LikeASouthBoundTrain 0 points1 point ago

I set it as my background as tiles which actually looks kinda cool.

[–]CaptainSpauIding 2 points3 points ago

where's the shitty watercolor guy when we need him ?

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]OGrizzle 8 points9 points ago

Blatant Repost

[–]ringadu 7 points8 points ago

repost

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points ago

Reposts.

[–]shamu2893 1 point2 points ago

Wow that's just brilliant

[–]ivvy2340 1 point2 points ago

I like this, no blobs of grey playdo on a white boards.

[–]ILoveTrance 1 point2 points ago

Looks like Türkbükü.

[–]AHandsomeManAppears 1 point2 points ago

Beautiful! But how is the effect so perfectly achieved?

I mean, the light source must be distanced from the small blue pieces to achieve the big blue shadow. Yet there are no light directed or refracted toward the floor? How does he achieve the white fade between sea and land? There is barely any red surfaces in that area to superpose red, yellow and blue together. If the light itself was colored, there would be a filtering problem through some of the pieces.

I would really like to see a video of this being put together!

[–]Blusteel 1 point2 points ago

This picture recieved my first audible "wow" for today. Seriously, art like this never ceases to amuse me.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

Those aren't shadows, moron.

[–]veronicalake4 1 point2 points ago

xpost

[–]ThatsSplendid 1 point2 points ago

Repost.

[–]sonce 4 points5 points ago

This is repost, but I wouldn't mind seeing it everyday, coz its brilliant and beautiful!

[–]ckim44 4 points5 points ago

Although this might be a repost, I still appreciate it! :D

[–]Snow_King 0 points1 point ago

Amazing. Simply amazing.

[–]mark331 0 points1 point ago

This is Great! Can I get the artist's name?

[–]DerpinNinjaa 0 points1 point ago

Wow, that is really beautiful

[–]GrandChawhee 0 points1 point ago

It's like Chihuly and Calder had a mobile baby.

[–]Bamboo_Razorwhip 0 points1 point ago

Neat. :)

[–]Kriptonyte 0 points1 point ago

I refuse to believe this is real! It's too god damn beautiful.

[–]PanicPilz 0 points1 point ago

This is so cool that I may throw up.

[–]Pravusmentis 0 points1 point ago

I want instructions for this

[–]gypsiequeen 0 points1 point ago

I love seeing installation art that ISN'T entirely pointless and stupid.

This is utterly amazing. THIS is art.

[–]fatcat111 0 points1 point ago

It's Awesome! Why do I feel the overwhelming urge to spin it?

[–]IneptPhotoDetective 0 points1 point ago

Ah, Monaco in spring. How beautiful it always is.

[–]TheKingOfTheRedLions 0 points1 point ago

What's this style of art called and where can I find more of it?

[–]pwordishamster 0 points1 point ago

that is really awesome!

[–]marcoc1202 0 points1 point ago

Anyone else just look at the crystals and notice the art second?

[–]rahifi 0 points1 point ago

This reminds me of these trash sculptures I saw at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston once. Apparently it also made the rounds to PS1 in New York, and probably elsewhere.

[–]GregOttawa 0 points1 point ago

Where can I Buy one?

[–]ikhan209 0 points1 point ago

mind = blown

[–]BillBraskysBallbag 0 points1 point ago

Oh look it's this picture for the eleventy billionth time.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Shut up and take my money.

[–]P4N1K 0 points1 point ago

Light* since when does lack of it make color?

[–]GotBetterThingsToDo 1 point2 points ago

Lack of particular wavelengths in light is what keeps it from being pure white and instead looking like a specific color. The simple proof of concept for this is that if you look very, very closely (magnified) at an LCD screen, you will see that the places which have red, green and blue cells at full brightness appear white.

This of course only works with light emission, not reflective light.

[–]Infidel_Grey 0 points1 point ago

The custodian for the night turns on the AC. A strong gust of air from the local vent rushes into the room and...

[–]SybariticLegerity 0 points1 point ago

Vsauce?

[–]vinpocetine 0 points1 point ago

I would love to have this hanging near a window.

[–]IM_THE_DECOY 0 points1 point ago

Shadows are an absence of light.

What you are seeing here is different wavelengths of light refracting onto the way.

But correctness aside, that is fucking awesome.

[–]PhillOS 0 points1 point ago

It reminds me of those horrible windows in churches.. i dont like churches.. you know the rest!

Not a single doubting post?? We'll here goes nothing for being different.

This could easily have been achieved using a projector, projecting the image against the white wall, the suspended glass sculpture hanging from the ceiling creates the illusion, that the composition and light is creating the landscape.

So im calling BS on this..

[–]Krispyz 0 points1 point ago

Suddenly: gust of wind.

[–]Steelwoolironsheep 0 points1 point ago

Mind=blown glass

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

Man I hate the art with shadows of blocks and such making figures, but this is actually pretty cool!

[–]basedgodwoop 0 points1 point ago

Am I the only one who has seen this on reddit before...?

[–]KingTsu 0 points1 point ago

Now this is art!

[–]patrik667 0 points1 point ago

As a 3D artist, I'd have had the title as "Refractions"

[–]shphunk 0 points1 point ago

Are you kidding me with this?

[–]RepDetec 0 points1 point ago

Refraction.

[–]Jawthumb 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, this is still as cool as when it was top post two months ago!

[–]filthgrinder 0 points1 point ago

Fucking.Amazing.

[–]ITSAPTERODACTYL 0 points1 point ago

repostrepostrepost

[–]migueldias94 0 points1 point ago

My sister showed me this image a long time ago. It was posted on 9gag.

[–]Psychography 0 points1 point ago

So mystical ~

[–]Ace1999 0 points1 point ago

I don't get it. What's it supposed to be?

[–]azremodehar 0 points1 point ago

...wow. Colour me very impressed.

[–]flyonawall 0 points1 point ago

Awesome.

[–]cats_are_people_too 0 points1 point ago

This is such bullshit. The colours only "add" to an already completed painting. That painting could have been anything and the colours would have had the same effect.

[–]PlumthePancake 0 points1 point ago

REPOSTABEFLAKRFJLASDFJDLASKFLSDKFAFD

[–]ciffers 0 points1 point ago

This is the most amazing thing I have ever seen!

[–]gregsmith93 0 points1 point ago

ALIENS

[–]chachi4965 0 points1 point ago

saw this on vsauce not to long ago...

[–]LadyNerd 0 points1 point ago

RE-RE-RE-RE-RE-REEEEEEEEEEEEEE-POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOST

[–]Geo 0 points1 point ago

Am I the only one who clicks the image, goes Meh, it's just junk hanging from a ceiling, then goes back and sees the thumbnail/title and goes "oooooooh that's why it was posted."?

[–]OxyHydro 0 points1 point ago

This type of art is amazing

[–]BlazingFox 0 points1 point ago

1337 votes!

[–]cmatute 0 points1 point ago

"Are you fucking kidding me?"

My reaction to this awesomeness.

[–]KoolKilla3000 0 points1 point ago

PENIS!!!

[–]Shazambom 0 points1 point ago

I had one of those

[–]Blackhacker1031 0 points1 point ago

wow ,that looks mad cool

[–]EitanWolf 0 points1 point ago

This was definitley on vsauce in the last video.

[–]trekbette 0 points1 point ago

This medium is so creative, so beautiful. I wish I could do something like this!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

This is a repost, and those aren't shadows.

[–]vagrantwade 0 points1 point ago

Hate to be one of those repost guys, but when it's something that had over 2000 upvotes a month ago...

[–]LarperPro -1 points0 points ago

REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST REPOST