I didn't say I was going to prove God is real. I was saying that claiming your viewpoint is reality is arrogant and illogical. I am all for providing evidence behind viewpoints to show how likely they are. However, I don't feel like we can perfectly know reality (we are always capable of being biased or making imperfect observations), we can just test it and make conclusions from the results and determine likelihood. I assume that's why scientists use the word theory instead of reality. Scientific theories are able to be overturned if there is overwhelming evidence contradicting them (more than the evidence supporting them). I don't see why our viewpoints should be any different, or why we should claim anything to be a reality if there is a possibility that it could be overturned. Reality isn't subject to change. Our understanding of reality is.