this post was submitted on
17 points (60% like it)
48 up votes 31 down votes

pics

subscribe2,408,580 readers

7,701 users here now

Looking for an image subreddit with minimal rules? Check out /r/images

A place to share interesting photographs and pictures. Feel free to post your own, but please read the rules first (see below), and note that we are not a catch-all for general images (of screenshots, comics, etc.)

Spoiler code

Please mark spoilers like this:
[text here](/spoiler)

Hover over to read.

Rules

  1. No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, info-graphics and most diagrams. Text (e.g. a URL) serving to credit the original author is exempt.

  2. No gore or porn. NSFW content must be tagged.

  3. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking & harassment will not be tolerated.

  4. No solicitation of votes (including "cake day" posts), posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor, or [FIXED] posts. DAE posts go in /r/DoesAnybodyElse. "Fixed" posts should be added as a comment to the original image.

  5. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to an image hosting website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

  • If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don't delete it as that just makes the filter hate you!

  • If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it!

Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichés/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning.

Links

If your post doesn't meet the above rules, consider submitting it on one of these other subreddits:

Comics  
/r/comics /r/webcomics
/r/vertical /r/f7u12
/r/ragenovels /r/AdviceAtheists
Image macros Screenshots/text
/r/lolcats /r/screenshots
/r/AdviceAnimals /r/desktops
/r/Demotivational /r/facepalm (Facebook)
/r/reactiongifs /r/DesktopDetective
Wallpaper Animals
/r/wallpaper /r/aww
/r/wallpapers /r/cats
The SFWPorn Network /r/TrollingAnimals
  /r/deadpets
  /r/birdpics
  /r/foxes
Photography Un-moderated pics
/r/photography /r/AnythingGoesPics
/r/photocritique /r/images
/r/HDR
/r/windowshots
/r/PictureChallenge
Misc New reddits
/r/misc /r/britpics
/r/gifs Imaginary Network
/r/dataisbeautiful /r/thennnow
/r/picrequests /r/SpecArt
/r/LookWhoIMet
  /r/timelinecovers
  /r/MemesIRL
  /r/OldSchoolCool
  /r/photoshopbattles

Also check out http://irc.reddit.com

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

all 25 comments

[–]regmaster 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If there was a parade for every one of the >100,000 soldiers who toured in Iraq or Afghanistan, not many would give a shit. If the box of Wheaties you were about to buy was endorsed by Joe Soldier, you probably wouldn't give a shit. You would probably give quite a few shits, however, if each soldier in the military was paid $9 million.

So what the hell are you trying to say? Like Slinky_Eastwood said, I'm all about taking better care of our veterans. But I can tell you that most of them don't care for acclaim or accolade. They just want to serve their time and then move on, no parade needed.

[–]Bluemeanie92 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think the idea is more that our sports players are way over-celebrated and much over-glamorized. Not that our soldiers should all have parades for them and be paid millions.

[–]regmaster 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Oh, well if that's the case, then I agree wholeheartedly.

[–]KingZuul 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm sure the soldier was just happy he came home alive.

[–]winnar72 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I recently went to a parade for some returning vets and work for a state agency that fast tracks vets into high paid management positions. I also get no thrills from watching millionaires play sports.

[–]monkat 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, we value entertainment very highly, which leads to ridiculous fiscal positions for well-playing people.

[–]1123581321345589144b 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, one is killing for a corporate government. The othe is entertaining millions. I don't see the problem here.

[–]NotSayingJustSaying 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it could be said they're both entertaining millions. at least, that's how it feels some times.

[–]Stares_at_walls 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Moral of the story: Tax the living shit out of the rich.

[–]laverns -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That sounds great. Make the rich guy poor to make the poor guy rich.

[–]Stares_at_walls 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Make the rich guy poor to make the poor guy rich.

Yeah, cos if you get taxed 50% for every dollar over 300k and 90% for every dollar over 1m that makes you poor. Pretty sure these fuckers are still making ridiculously large amounts of money for relatively little work.

A guy who earns 1m a year does not work 20 times harder than the guy who earns 50k a year.

You can keep your liberty to live a life of selfish decadence. I'll be over here enjoying my socialism, because I'm not a sociopathic asshole.

[–]laverns -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You think people should get taxed 90% for every dollar over 1m? That is fucking crazy. You are among the idiots who think all rich people are evil. Why should hardworking (yes, thats right, you cant generalise rich people like you love too) people who manages to make good companies and earn good money be punished for other peoples mistakes? Wether those other people are rich or not.

"A guy who earns 1m a year does not work 20 times harder than the guy who earns 50k a year."

That completely depends! A guy who makes 1m a year is much more likely to work harder than someone who earns 50k a year. 12 hour days aren't normal for 50k a year people. God you are stupid.

A so you're not an asshole, you just want to take all the money from the successful people and give it away? THAT is fucking sociopathic behaviour. By doing this there would be no reason for anyone to work hard and try to make something great. Whats the point, you'll lose most of what you earn anyway cause some guy who doesn't understand how the society works blames you for him being poor.

People like you should not be allowed to vote.

[–]Stares_at_walls 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

people who manages to make good companies and earn good money be punished for other peoples mistakes?

How is tax a punishment?

A guy who makes 1m a year is much more likely to work harder than someone who earns 50k a year. 12 hour days aren't normal for 50k a year people.

False. You've made two claims thus far. The first is that people who earn >1m (annually) generally work harder than those earning 50k. What about the Nurses who work long shifts in arduous conditions? What about Store managers who work 12 hour days and earn little more than cashiers? What about waiting staff who earn sweet fuck all in your land of free and impoverished, home of the brave and manipulated? Your claim that executive types work harder than anyone else is laughably absurd.

Your second claim infers that if you are wealthy, you have somehow earned that money. If you take the sum annual salary of a teacher, a soldier, an accountant, a lawyer, a retail manager and a plumber, you're still likely to be a hell of a long way from 1m, and yet these executive scum can get bonuses in excess of millions of dollars simply by manipulating the resources of others, even if lose the wealth they are supposed to protect. Anyone who thinks a person can rightfully earn 1m plus USD in a year while so many are working well in excess of full time hours and still struggle to make a living is most certainly a sociopathic individual with no regard for the wellbeing of others.

you just want to take all the money from the successful people and give it away?

How do you define success? The Church of Scientology (and religion in general) is financially successful. Homeopathy, Chiropractic, 'Psychics' and other such pseudoscientic rubbish are financially successful. Bernie Madoff was financially successful. As is Bill O' Reilly and the rest of Newscorp. But what is their value? Nothing. All of these things are only detrimental to society and offer nothing of value, yet they are profitable. Cigarettes are profitable. Derivative trading can be profitable. Is this the success you want to promote? You want to live in a country where money=respect? If you do not earn >1m, you're a fucking loser, is what you would have us believe. You probably don't think it's worth getting out of bed in the morning for a 300k salary. Why start a business when any income I make over 300k is taxed at 50%, you ask. I mean, that's only 6 times the income of an ordinary person, but hell, that's not enough for you. Fuck innovation, fuck creativity, If I can't make a sweet billion or two what's the point? Here's the thing. You don't need that much money to be successful and happy, and nobody deserves that much money. You seem like the type of person who stays awake at night crying that Beyonce and Jay-Z lost a couple of million to piracy, and now they have to make do with their countless millions, all the while not giving a fuck about all the other struggling, yet equally talented artists out there.

You'll lose most of what you earn, you say? So by the time you've 'earned' ~700k, you'll 'only' be left with ~500k after tax. Cry me a fucking river over the fact you can only afford one Ferrari this year. If you need more incentive then you clearly don't give a fuck about innovation or real success, you just care about money, money, and more fucking money so you can rub it over yourself as you masturbate and tell your country club friends how successful you are. Give me a fucking break.

Your fundamental claim that high taxes kills incentive requires that ~300k is not a fuckload of money, and more than enough for any respectable human being and that taxes would stop you from earning significantly more than this, if you are able to adequately able to manipulate those around you to further increase your wealth, which is obviously not the case.

Why would I have any respect for someone who insists on the right to hoard wealth without limitation or concern for societal wellbeing (that means other human beings FYI, poor people have rights too)? The fact that you think the money someone makes is a better indicator of success and worth than the actual work someone does disgusts me.

Assuming you're American, you can rest assured I won't be voting for any of your potential future leaders, as I am not American. I understand that Americans have been raised in a culture that worships money above all else and assume that all financial success is earned. Personally, I prefer to judge people on their own merits. You can tell me how proud you are of having the 'liberty' to let 50,000 of your fellow citizens die needlessly every year because your failure to instate what is a basic human right in any civilised and ethical society; universal health care. Meanwhile, I'll just be over here thinking about how I can further contribute something of value to society, while you seek to leech maximum wealth from others in a self-deluded quest for what your corporate media has convinced you is success, much like a cancer consuming its host until nothing is left, and both are left to die.

Enjoy your nation's position in the global drivers seat while it lasts, because as long as you continue to clutch to your superstition and consumerism while others seek scientific development and innovation, it is sure not to last much longer.

[–]laverns -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"How is tax a punishment?"

It's a punishment when you make the people successful people pay 90% in taxes, THAT is a punishment. I live in Norway and here we have progressive taxing, and thats fine, but suggesting taxing 90% is just silly and will do no good for the society.

"False. You've made two claims thus far. The first is that people who earn >1m (annually) generally work harder than those earning 50k. What about the Nurses who work long shifts in arduous conditions? What about Store managers who work 12 hour days and earn little more than cashiers? What about waiting staff who earn sweet fuck all in your land of free and impoverished, home of the brave and manipulated? Your claim that executive types work harder than anyone else is laughably absurd."

Based on the amount of hours, nurses make earn as good as engineers here. And engineers have a starting salary of little under 100 000 dollars. Sure, they work hard hours, and I'm not saying earning a lot of money equals working hardere than the blue collar guys. There will always be hard jobs who doesn't pay good, but the average guy doesn't work as hard as the guy who works his way up to become wealthy. That often means sacrificing a lot and working terribly hard weeks for years. If they then, at age 40+ doesn't work as hard as they used to, they have still earned their money. Most people don't work their asses off, most rich people have.

"Bernie Madoff was financially successful"

Bernie Madoff was a successful criminal and obviously not relevant to the my use of the word successful. Unless you are saying that all rich guys working on wall street should be taxed hard because they might be criminals?

"But what is their value? Nothing. All of these things are only detrimental to society and offer nothing of value, yet they are profitable. Cigarettes are profitable. Derivative trading can be profitable. Is this the success you want to promote? You want to live in a country where money=respect? If you do not earn >1m, you're a fucking loser, is what you would have us believe."

This is crazy and you have clearly entered a state of mind where I am some kind of asshole rich guy. Their value is entertainment for the masses, the masses normally don't like high quality entertainment and thats how it will always be. It's like claiming football has no value, but it does. It provides entertainment, and people want/need entertainment to be happy. It's part of our nature. It's not about promoting derivative trading, you are talking like all jobs making a person earn good money has no value and this has nothing to do with money=status. A society where everyone is the middle class because you can't handle people earning more/less? Is that what you want, a society that keeps everyone making good money down, just because? It's important to have a fair society. How is it fair that if a guy starts a business, people love it and the guy earns good money, then he should be punished so he won't make TOO much, because that can make the 'average guy' feel bad? basically making everyone earning more than 1m a loser, great.

" You probably don't think it's worth getting out of bed in the morning for a 300k salary. Why start a business when any income I make over 300k is taxed at 50%, you ask. I mean, that's only 6 times the income of an ordinary person, but hell, that's not enough for you. Fuck innovation, fuck creativity, If I can't make a sweet billion or two what's the point? Here's the thing. You don't need that much money to be successful and happy, and nobody deserves that much money. "

Oh jeez. Here we go again with the stereotype. You have a picture of me as the rich capitalistic asshole. I'm a normal guy idiot, focus on the case. What you are doing now, and your whole text is showing it, is starting to make arguments based on emotions. I don't care about your emotions. I'm not rich, and I don't care if it makes you feel bad that there are rich assholes among the rich.

"Why start a business when any income I make over 300k is taxed at 50%, you ask. "

Nope, I ask why start a business when any high income I make is taxed at 90%. Why are you twisting my words, pretending I write something I do not write? You clearly have a personal agenda and this is actually the way Bill O'reilly argues, on emotions not logic.

"Fuck innovation, fuck creativity, If I can't make a sweet billion or two what's the point? Here's the thing. You don't need that much money to be successful and happy, and nobody deserves that much money."

Ah, what a moron you are turning into. How do you expect people to discuss with you when you're acting like this? What a behavior. Great innovation and creativity combined with HARD work often makes good money, and that money is deserved. I'm not saying you need much money to be happy, what I am saying is that if you earn that money, you have as much right to it as the lazy guy who works half the amount of time and earn half the amount of money.

"and nobody deserves that much money"

Look at this, are you fucking serious? Of course they do. Sure, people who fuck others over like they have been doing on wall street doesn't deserve it, but that is not the case. If you have made a product, lets say windows, then you have earned the money that this product will get you.

"You seem like the type of person who stays awake at night crying that Beyonce and Jay-Z lost a couple of million to piracy, and now they have to make do with their countless millions, all the while not giving a fuck about all the other struggling, yet equally talented artists out there."

Here we go again with the emotions, stereotyping and asshole behavior. I don't give a shit of Jay-Z lose a couple of millions to piracy, piracy is good. Tho this has nothing to do with piracy and is just a idiotic attack on me personally, way to go!

"Cry me a fucking river over the fact you can only afford one Ferrari this year". No, it's not caring about money, its about fairness and not punishment. What you want to do is to keep people making good money down. What a retarded way to think the society should be driven, hold people down so they don't make too much. Just tax the shit out of them so they won't be able to harvest the success of their businesses. You are one little angry communist aren't you.

"Your fundamental claim that high taxes kills incentive requires that ~300k is not a fuckload of money"

My claim is based on statistics, evidence, knowledge of how the society works. That is all. I do not care for helping rich guys out, I care for having the society work in a good way, and punishing people with extreme taxes is not good for the society. If you want to know why, go to the homepage of The Economist and search for the aricle "Hunting the Rich".

"Why would I have any respect for someone who insists on the right to hoard wealth without limitation or concern for societal wellbeing"

Oh you should take a trip to Norway and see how much the rich are contributing the society. Probably much more than in your country, where are you from? Funny that you assume I am an american, so much you resemble one.

" The fact that you think the money someone makes is a better indicator of success and worth than the actual work someone does disgusts me."

Here we go being and idiot again. A successful business is one that makes good money, thats one of the usual ways to define success. I've never said anything about money being more worth than someones actual work or worth, again with the silly presumptions.

Success may refer to: - a level of social status - achievement of an objective (goal) - the opposite of failure

Success is to each his own, so what? Is it not success to make a product that sell good? Of course it is.

" I understand that Americans have been raised in a culture that worships money above all else and assume that all financial success is earned. Personally, I prefer to judge people on their own merits."

I do the same, I don't judge based on money, but that is one thing that can make someone successful. I'm raised in the richest country on earth (based on how much each person earn) and here it's the opposite of America, money is not everything at all.

" You can tell me how proud you are of having the 'liberty' to let 50,000 of your fellow citizens die needlessly every year because your failure to instate what is a basic human right in any civilised and ethical society; universal health care."

And again you make a fool out of yourself. You forgot I am in fact norwegian and live in a society where everyone gets free healthcare, free school, and everyone gets every human rights possible. Nice try.

"Meanwhile, I'll just be over here thinking about how I can further contribute something of value to society, while you seek to leech maximum wealth from others in a self-deluded quest for what your corporate media has convinced you is success, much like a cancer consuming its host until nothing is left, and both are left to die."

Again, hostil ridiculous hatred who have nothing to do with me or what we are discussing. Funny thing is, if you are able to contribute to the society in a great way, its a high risk you will also make good money while doing it.

"Enjoy your nation's position in the global drivers seat while it lasts, because as long as you continue to clutch to your superstition and consumerism while others seek scientific development and innovation, it is sure not to last much longer."

Oh I'll enjoy my nations free healthcare, free schools, welfare etc.

Hah, scientific development and innovation. How you manage to think America is not one of the most innovativ and scientific nations on earth baffles me. Although they are on the way down, they still are the biggest attraction for intellectual capacities with their schools. Surely thats changing, but you let once again you're silly childish hate getting in the way.

Grow up.

[–]NotSayingJustSaying 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]laverns 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How on earth does that fit with "tax the living shit out of the rich"?

I am for progressive tax, but not punishment, that does no good to the society.

[–]NotSayingJustSaying 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was just struck by the look on Norway's face. Like it's so ingrained, so expected, that the rich would be taxed on behalf of the poor, that the alternative incites an aggressive response. Sorry if it was tangential.

[–]laverns 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ah I see. Sure, we are kind of socialistic in Norway, too much for my liking tho.

[–]LeonProfessional 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Artifacts. Artifacts everywhere.

[–]Chvostek 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

One has a very specialized skill set that many others try to achieve and fail at, making his skills a very valuable commodity, the other one has a very tough job, but one that a number of people are willing and able to do as well. Not a (moral/ethical) value judgment on either, just the economics of two different occupations.

[–]Stinky_Eastwood 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Dude number 2 volunteered for that shit. If he did for a parade he's a dumbass.

That said, I'm all for paying and supporting our veterans better.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So NFL players don't volunteer either?

[–]SamSlam 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Exactly. You choose what you want. I don't think soldiers do it for the money or praise. They do it for the fulfillment of defending their country. I'm sure most soldiers are happy doing what they're doing because they chose that path and take pride in it.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You don't know many soldiers, do you?

[–]laverns -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"They do it for the fulfillment of defending their country."

Some. Most are just brainwashed young boys being sent out to a meaningless war.