this post was submitted on
893 points (55% like it)
4,461 up votes 3,568 down votes

funny

subscribe2,369,134 readers

22,221 users here now

PLEASE, No posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.


Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress.

  • Rage comics - Go to /fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 256

[–]Antarmy1 69 points70 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The rhythm of the cat moving its paws is beautiful

[–]PolishDude 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And just like the cat with his hypnotic paw movement, the sole purpose of the president is to distract from any source of power and influence, not to actually have or represent it...

[–]Cloud7654 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Zaphod Beeblebrox 2012!

[–]PolishDude 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Reading the first book right now actually, after years of putting it off for other studies.

[–]Cloud7654 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I just read the first book for the first time about a week ago. I enjoyed it a lot more than I expected and I've already ordered the whole remainder to the series on Amazon!

[–]PolishDude 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I just finished the first book and it reminded me of Monty Python skits - I did a search and, yep, it was written years after Monty Python's Flying Circus shows were first aired.

Started the second book, and so far it has a completely different form than the first - much more dialogue, like a script.

I know they made movies based on the book, but I haven't seen those yet...

[–]astro_nerd 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Psychology funfact: If you read the text in the GIF in a female voice, you are homosexual.

[–]PolishDude 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you applied any homosexual theories to the GIF, you may have an underlying thought disorder.

That cat GIF is your personal Rorschach test, astro_nerd, and you've been detected positive for homosexual fixations.

[–]astro_nerd -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Impossible, I read it in a male voice.

[–]josieisabunny 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm gay and I heard it in a guy voice

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]secretchimp -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Wroooooong subreddit, tickledickles.

[–]Commisar 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

MOON BASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[–]nixons_dog 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's no moon! It's Newt Gingrich's head!

[–]ScottCarmichael 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

WRONG! IT'S MITT'S AFTERLIFE PLANET FULL OF WOMEN TO BED!

[–]DefinitelyRelephant 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How do you get a cat to do that?? That's awesome.

[–]MrJacoste 23 points24 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My cat is ಠ_ಠing at the screen while I urge her to try this.

[–]coffea_arabica 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

ಠ_ಠing

Shit, that even looks kind of like a cat.

[–]countertrollsource 16 points17 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You just turned the look of disapproval into a verb. Kudos to you fine sir.

[–]stylushappenstance 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My cat does this when she wants attention, but she gets her paws up high above her face and generally gets into it more than this cat.

[–]fronc 43 points44 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was expecting a picture of a turd sandwich and a douche bag

[–]Topical_NickCage_Gif 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]BearPaw07 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Casing fit like a condom.

[–]I_live_in_a_trashcan 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Vote or Die!

[–]unled 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]RustySpork 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I have not seen that meme in 5 years.

[–]nonrate 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I also feel the same way, except for Vermin Supreme. I know exactly what he's doing.

[–]Masturbating_Jedi 16 points17 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What I saw: Fap fap fap...... Fap fap fap.

[–]_Battletoads 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This isn't the cat you are looking for.

[–]Spr09 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

use the force anacat! use the force!

[–]ImNakedHowBoutYou 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

...which would still be correct: American politics is one big circlejerk.

[–]Masturbating_Jedi 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think that's something we all can agree on.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yay, this cat gif again.

[–]shadoworc01 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

McGOVERN 2012!

[–]Ali_2m 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Unrelated Question: What kind of cats is that?

[–]CaptainInternets[S] 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think it may be some kind of ragdoll, but I'm no expert. link: http://www.cfa.org/Client/breedRagdoll.aspx

Happy Cake Day though :D

[–]MasticationMan 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Patrick Star 2012

[–]SqueamishCow 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Get your politics out of my funny

[–]Modus_Pwnen 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not so much funny as overtly political.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My favourite part was the Super Mario 64 next to it.

[–]Hoffspeaks 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Relevant?. Sometimes it's the only way to stay sane on the campaign.

[–]TehSquid 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]i_live_on_an_island 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

dis is amazin.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

rp.

[–]AsylumPlagueRat 16 points17 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And then... there was Ron Paul.

[–]ScizRGaming 33 points34 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thank fucking zeus he has no chance to win it.

[–]m0r14rty 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

An anti-Paul reply with no reasoning behind it, I've never seen these before.

[–]ScizRGaming 22 points23 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Reasons? His economic policies and him wanting to return to the gold standard would cause massive deflation and liquidation of debt. The entire economy would be fucked 10 times sideways.

[–]treebeard189 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Also I think abolishing the IRS and getting rid of ALL our international bases is ridiculus. I mean look at Somalia and that recent mission there with SEAL team 6. If we didn't own that base it would have been much harder. I agree we need to get rid of some of our bases as well as cut back troop levels but cutting all forghein aid and all bases is ridiculous. I am sorry it sounds good on part but it doesn't hold water

[–]Durzo_Blint 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Pull out all American soldiers from areas that they provide stability to? Sure, why not! What could possibly go wrong?

[–]AsylumPlagueRat -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Provide stability to? He has an ad about it. Youtube "Ron Paul Ad Chinese Troops" or something like that.

[–]Durzo_Blint 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This one? What about our base in Japan? It acts as a counterbalance to the Russians, Chinese, and North Koreans and helps protect our allies in Japan and South Korea and helps keep the Chinese out of Taiwan.

What about the US Navy? If we are busy closing down bases it means that our Navy can't operate as far out as they do now patrolling for pirates off the coast of Somalia or giving a show of force to Iran in the Straight of Hormuz.

If you don't think a withdrawal from our military bases would have huge international economic, political, and military repercussions then you haven't thought it through enough or don't care.

[–]AsylumPlagueRat 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's exactly the one! And while I agree some of these are necessary, he mainly focuses on pulling out of Southeast Asia, our presence there being mutually problematic, not to mention unnecessary.

[–]neilmcc 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Why is the income tax good? Does the government own the fruits of my labor?

Suppose you pay 33%. Is it right to work for the government 4 months of the year? Why should I be forced to pay for wars and a police state I find morally reprehensible?

Why shouldn't those countries we occupy pay for their own defense? Does it not breed hostility to interfere in the affairs of others? How would you feel if China built a base in Texas?

[–]treebeard189 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Okay I am not going to argue in depth tax code with you at 11:30 pm but I will try to provide an acceptable rebuttal. I don't think anyone wants to see the tax code stay the way it is almost everyone agrees it needs to at least be simplified. Completely wiping out the IRS though is foolish to say the least. First off you are still going to red the IRS to regulate taxes even if they change drastically because people will always cheat the system. our tax collecting services are some of the best in the world the problem is the tax code is always changing (I think they averaged a change to the code almost every day last year) and also that their funding is getting cut so they can't go after people hiding their money so the taxes get raised on everyone else to compensate. Even at it's lowest point during the bush era the IRS averaged a 200% return on all finding they received.

To your second point with not wanting to pay for our wars. Do you support government health care (which you may be benefiting from at the moment as many people are), or welfare, national parks, government roads, and countless other things the government provides? If yes well you cant just to pick for the things that you like. While much of your money is going to fighting these wars it's going towards all this don't blame the tax code for that. If no than I heard there are some nice banks in Singapore who will hide your money for you or Canada is nice so you might consider moving. That's as far as I'm going I have to wake up In 6 hours but I might add to this when I get back home tomorrow afternoon if I feel like it.

[–]neilmcc -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Do you support government health care (which you may be benefiting from at the moment as many people are), or welfare, national parks, government roads, and countless other things the government provides? I

All of these things are dubious at best since I'm continually disappointed in these things- even national parks where I have spent a considerable amount of time in to know first hand how poorly the state manages the parks.

But this does not address the problem anyway. Suppose I knock on your door and take half of your wealth at gun point. Let's say I give half of it to charity but I use the other half to buy more guns to rob still more people.

Who are you to complain how the money is used? I gave half to charity! You should be thankful to me. Afterall, maybe the charity helped you out. Maybe I used half your money to pave the road in front of your house.

And so your solution? I should just move away from the bully. Go to Singapore or something (who have their own form of taxation anyway). I should leave my homeland. How can you call this an argument? I challenge any free thinker to think long and hard on these questions because there is not an easy answer, only dodges and platitudes about social contracts and such.

[–]treebeard189 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Okay I promised myself I wouldn't get into this but first off that last bit about Canada and Singapore was more of a joke. The problem with your robber analogy is that if the robber was never there you would not lose anything you would just go on as normal. If you didn't pay taxes your day to day to life would change drastically very quickly imagine the US with no funding at all. It would be madness. Like I said earlier you can't just pick and choose which services you want to pay for. You are basically paying fir a package deal here to put it very simply. You may disagree with parts or even most of it but if you want to appreciate the good parts than you out up with the bad parts.

[–]neilmcc 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ok- to make the analogy more apt, suppose I use my guns to prevent any sort of private industry from providing the same service. Suppose I shoot anyone that tries to build a road, offer medical care, build schools- the analogy remains the same.

If you stopped paying this robber, your life would likewise change drastically. Suppose the robber built his own little jail and hauled you away to it if you didn't pay.

Like I said earlier you can't just pick and choose which services you want to pay for.

This is true, obviously. How does it make it right? Why should I be forced to pay for things I disagree with?

[–]Positron3 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Destroying the federal government would be catastrophic to say the least. It would do irreparable damage to our economy, foreign policy, infrastructure, and social services. Here's a taste of what could happen.

Economy: Gold standard fixes exchange rate. US unable to pay stimulate economy because of inability to expand money supply. Abolition of IRS cripples ability for US to pay off debts. Inflexible monetary policy stops any chance of economic recovery, creating further unemployment, which is even more devastating for the population due to the cuts in social services. US economy remains in a state of depression for at least 4 years.

Foreign policy: Immediate US withdrawal from all overseas bases. On the plus side, we withdraw from Afghanistan. On the other hand, we leave Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Turkey, and other critical bases in allied countries. China, Iran, and Russia exploit the sudden vacuum of power previously filled by the US. Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Israel and Turkey are drawn into a massive regional war in the Middle East. China and North Korea invade South Korea, Taiwan, and take control of the South China Sea and all of its resources. Russia, unrestricted by US pressure, has complete leverage over the EU because it controls most of the oil coming in. State National Guard, major US allies unable to resist foreign invasions. Oil prices skyrocket because of the war in the Middle East, causing a double dip recession. The US and European economies collapse, ending Western dominance of the world.

Social Services: Millions lose healthcare coverage after the shutdown of Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment, and Veterans benefits. State bureaucracy is overwhelmed with the massive number of new people who need government assistance, and cannot respond adequately for months. Thousands of people suffer from unnecessary deaths, complications, and general lack of healthcare. Medical costs bankrupt many, creating additional poverty. General dehumanization of the poor, elderly, and wounded.

Infrastructure: Federal government unable to maintain critical infrastructure, especially freeways. States unprepared for extra maintenance costs, loss of federal funding for maintenance of state infrastructure. Roads, bridges, freeways fall into disrepair as state bureaucracy adjusts to the situation. Industries are hurt because of slowed supply chains, weakening the economy. Coupled with the other economic impacts above, US economy continues on a long downwards spiral.

As you can see, the negative impacts of abolishing the IRS and in extension the Federal government far outweighs the even more unlikely positive impacts.

[–]treebeard189 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Oh and quickly for your last bit there. I think it would be great to have countries pay for our help but do you want to be seen as a nation that is not even trying to hide it's military will only care about your humanitarian problems if you can pay us. The bases are not always meant for stability they are great places to launch quick missions from.

As for the China base thing. If we had problems with Canada attacking us or a civil war threat I wouldn't mind a bit of back up (though the texans might disagree). As far as putting bases in our country outside of that I would understand the advantage that China gets from it for it's missions abroad and would hope our government would have made proper arrangements before letting them in. But to be honest I wouldn't care to much. They aren't exactly much of a threat With just a few bases

[–]neilmcc 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What is wrong with the liquidation of debt? Is it good for banks to be leveraged with subprime mortgages?

Why is deflation bad? Is it good to have the price of food and energy go up year after year? Who does it benefit more, the politically connected industry who use the higher value dollars first or the working class whose wages seem to buy less year after year?

[–]yep45 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

but you're okay with all the posts ripping on the other candidates without reason?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yea I have seen this a lot for a lot of candidates. I am no political guru. I am good at keeping conversation effective though.

Maybe you guys in /r/politics should make a new rule. Anyone who has a negative comment about a candidates policy preference must also provide an alternate candidate with a better policy preference and reason you believe so in the same comment. It might help with the circle-jerking.

Also, this should go without saying, when you resort to insulting the individual instead of the addressing the argument, you have then lost the argument. Do not pass go. Do not collect your' Karma.

[–]neilmcc 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Avoid /r/politics at all costs. /r/libertarian is vastly superior for intelligent conversation, even if you aren't libertarian.

[–]One_Letter_Shor 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Meh, not really, just a different political ideology. I'm a libertarian (subscribed to both r/libertarian and r/ronpaul) but it is just as much a circle jerk, if not more so, than r/politics.

[–]neilmcc 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you want to call someone out or argue people will do so respectfully for the most part. It's not great but it is certainly better.

[–]betterthanthee 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

True, people tend to be more respectful (I'm guessing it's because the average age is significantly older than the 19 year olds on r/politics), but the mindless dogma is still there.

[–]One_Letter_Shor 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Eh, I'd say the respectful consistency varies, just like in any subreddit. Also, all of the submissions are very oriented towards a libertarian, and I think anyone else would find it just as circle-jerky (especially with all the anti-r/politics posts). Also, I wouldn't say that just because someone disagree with us that it makes them unable to participate in intelligent conversation ;)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I seem to agree with a fair amount of what I saw of /r/libertarian . The weasel words are a big turn-off though. It seems like you guys could use the advice I provided as well.

[–]secretchimp -2 points-1 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Anti-Paul replies don't need any more reasoning than anti-9/11-was-faked replies.

[–]neilmcc -4 points-3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Must be nice agreeing with the mainstream narrative. Everything you're told is simply taken for granted.

[–]secretchimp -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You do realize how brainwashed you sound yourself when you keep spouting off this "the mainstream media and the corporate machine has you all tricked, but RON PAUL KNOWS THE TRUTH" crap

[–]zolfe 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The tinfoil hat industry must be donating heavily to Ron Paul.

[–]yumpizza -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Paul has some good ideas, countered by some bat-shit economy destroying ideas. Get over it.

[–]ratm3413 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just curious...why? He is the only honest candidate since forever.

[–]guynamedjames 29 points30 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just because someone is honest does not mean they are right, or have any idea what is best for a country

[–]neilmcc 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

An ever growing police state and an empire bankrupting us is best for our country.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Because of his insane budget plan to return to 2006 spending levels, end a few departments and cut the pentagon budget!

What about the children?!

Plan here: http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/

[–]Phirazo 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is the worst possible time to cut government spending. Let me break it down for you:

government projects = more jobs working on government projects

more jobs = more money in the pockets of those people who would be otherwise unemployed can spend

more money = even more jobs in the private sector

I don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend. We have a chance to improve our infrastructure, research the technologies of tomorrow, and improve the lives of every American. Why wouldn't we want to do that?

[–]AustinYQM 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Except we spend like 2.5% on infrastructure and I imagine around the same amount of RnD. Instead we spend the bulk of it on military we don't need and redundant departments we don't need that pass regulations that produce a more toxic environment for companies.

[–]neilmcc 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Stay the course! What could go wrong?

[–]AsylumPlagueRat 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"If every voter that said they liked Ron Paul but he can't win voted for Ron Paul, he would win."

[–]guynamedjames 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No. There wasn't. This man's 1930s views on science and desire to cut half the government (along with the jobs they create) make him pretty fucking bad. Just because he's anti-war and pro-legalizing drugs does not make him a good candidate. And even though he actually sticks to his guns, he's still super pro-rich people on his tax plan (hell, he wants to cut all income taxes). The man has like 3 good points and reddit loves to ignore everything else

[–]wkuechen 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I, for one, agree with you entirely. I thank the majority of Paul supporters my age (by which I mean college-aged) do not understand that many of his views are extremely conservative. He voiced his full support for the Mississippi Personhood Amendment a few months back.

[–]aRealSomebody 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, his point is that the United States government does not have the constitutional authority to collect an income tax.

But, fuck the Constitution, unless you're blocking a major bridge to protest bank fraud or someone's taking away your internet.

[–]Ill_Be_Here_All_Week 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeeaaah. There isn't one right way to interpret the Constitution. That's why we've had over 200 years of court cases about it. And income taxes is probably not your best area of argument considering the whole 16th amendment thing.

[–]ItsNotMineISwear 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Unless Ron Paul doesn't believe that amendments count as the Constitution, that makes no fucking sense.

[–]MakersOnTheRocks 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yea, he's a bad candidate. He was just able to predict the events of the last decade in 2002. He has no idea what he's talking about.

[–]Heimdall2061 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

As others have pointed out, being smart, likable, well-intentioned, and surprisingly prescient about the results of public elections does not necessarily mean that your ideas are sound. Be careful! Ad Hominem works both ways. Support him if you want, but state why you agree, not that he seems knowledgeable.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes. There was. This mans views on cutting the government (and the problems they create) are refreshing. "Just because he is anti-war" is good enough for a vote anyway, quit pissing off the rest of the world ya fucking retards and no one will want to bomb ya.

[–]Heimdall2061 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm gonna go ahead and put this out there: not only is that bullshit, but the rest of the world can go soak its head if they don't appreciate what we do. I'm not saying that we don't do bad things or make terrible mistakes, but America's foreign policy a.) has allowed Western Europe and Japan to feel pretty safe under a blanket of military security we have provided, to the point of not having much military at all compared to their historical expenditures on same , and b.) has provided massive amounts of aid and succor to other nations who were in trouble pretty much since the end of the Second World War, far more so than any other country has. Withdrawing American influence from the world would draw cries of joy from those who already are and would be our enemies no matter what, and would remove what I believe has become the strongest aspect of our nation: for better or worse, we've taken up the role of international cops and medics. I think we should lessen the former role somewhat, but at the end of the day, everybody says fuck the police. Not many people want to live in a world without them.

[–]neilmcc 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Are Japan and Europe incapable of providing their own defense? Why should Americans pay higher tax to subsidize the defense of other nations?

[–]Heimdall2061 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Let me put it this way. This has a list of countries who have pursued isolationist policies. Switzerland is doing OK. Everyone else? Horrible disaster. Not immediately, but eventually. Well, OK, fine, but we don't have to go all the way to isolationism, we can just lessen our involvement in other people's business, right? To some extent, that's true. And to some extent, we should. But like it or not, our country has assumed certain responsibilities, and we reap the benefits and the burdens of those international responsibilities. Maybe it shouldn't be that way, but, well, the Cold War happened, and it is that way. We pull out all over, back off on our treaties and pull our backing of these countries, and shit is going to happen, eventually. Maybe not eventually. Maybe quickly. And a lot of that shit is going to have a very negative impact on us, long run. Like it or not, we're a very powerful country, with a lot coming in and a lot going out, and like every other powerful nation in history, we have to be able to flex, and defend the people we said we would, or we risk our position.

EDIT: TL;DR- 'Cause we said we would, and if we go back on our word, we're untrustworthy. And that's no good for anybody.

[–]neilmcc -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What position is that? What is the risk? Do you believe an army will attack the U.S.? Which nation poses a threat?

What's so great about our military? It's been in Afghanistan for 10 years and still hasn't won. Maybe we should let the native people there police themselves? Do you think it is better for a foreign occupier to police a nation or for the people to police themselves?

Which benefits do we receive? I certainly haven't gotten any benefits.

[–]Heimdall2061 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In order. Position: most powerful country as the world, one of the primary nations pointed to when we say "First World." No army will attack us BECAUSE we're powerful. And because it's nonviable, and we've been working to make that true since the War of 1812.

As to the Afghanistan thing: we shouldn't be there. It's a disaster. Anyone who knows jack about history knows that that place is a damn black hole for money, men, and materiel. That said, we've done FAR better- like, hundreds of times better- than any of the other nations who've gotten involved there historically. You can't win a war like that, not easily, and not without very long-term involvement. At the risk of being taken the wrong way, what would have to happen there for us to "win" long-term would be the same as what the Romans had to do in Gaul- colonize. In the "short" term, though (and I know, not really very short), we can "win" by ensuring that a stable, U.S. friendly, democratic government gains and stays in power. Which we have. And I agree, they should be left to police themselves, we need to not be there. BUT, this is kind of an unintentionally good microcosm of what I'm talking about. We shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place, but we have, and now we are directly responsible for their fate. It would be most pragmatic to cut our losses and bug out immediately- but it would be unethical, and say what you will about our country's spotted past, we do TRY to be ethical. Most of the time.

Finally, benefits? YOU HAVEN'T GOTTEN BENEFITS? I hope that you are an American, and I didn't misunderstand you, or this will be a misguided rant. But you have no goddamn idea what you're talking about if you say you haven't had benefits from living here. This country has flaws, but if you are living in the United States, and are dirt-fucking-impoverished by our standards, you are still better off that probably 90% of the world's population. The BENEFITS we receive from being where we are are these: as you pointed out, you don't have to live in fear of another country's military coming in here and killing you or destroying your life. You don't have to worry about warring tribes raping your sisters or mother or daughters. You probably don't have to worry about where your next meal is coming from, which is a damn sight better than a fucking lot of people out there. At the risk of sounding like Jack Nicholson, you have the luxury to sit at a computer and argue with strangers over how much your country sucks, while sentinels protect you, and a good portion of the rest of the world, from anyone who would dare to attack you, and you don't even have to worry about being carted off by secret police and tortured or "disappeared" when you talk about how shitty your country is. Anyway. Rant over.

TL;DR- Go talk to some kids in Mexico and explain to them how we suffer under our cruel yoke.

[–]neilmcc 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

sit at a computer and argue with strangers over how much your country sucks,

I love this country. I do not love the state's foreign policy. Know the difference.

you don't have to live in fear of another country's military coming in here and killing you or destroying your life.

So you think we are stronger having soldiers around the world rather than guarding our borders? Policing other nations and building their infrastructure rather than our own?

live in fear of another country's military coming in here and killing you or destroying your life.

How do you think the Iraqi people feel when hundreds of thousands of people have died when the U.S. invaded?

[–]Heimdall2061 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I understand that. But realize that what I said is actually true. We have responsibilities to uphold.

What is the risk? Do you believe an army will attack the U.S.? Which nation poses a threat? So you think we are stronger having soldiers around the world rather than guarding our borders?

I'll just let that one be. Suffice to say, a looming threat of offense is the best defense. Now, as far as the infrastructure thing goes, I actually do think we should shrink our military some. Not a huge amount, but some. It's easy to forget that a huge chunk of our military spending goes into research that yields new technologies which are massively useful- GPS, for example. That said, our failure to fix our domestic problems has little to do with our willingness to help others fix theirs. Don't make the mistake of thinking that one is exclusive of the other in any way. And yes, I know, Iraq. I was thinking that even as I typed it. That is, however, and appeal to emotion, and also incidentally a really good case in point for why it's good to have a strong military and cultivate allies. There's a lot of rhetoric that basically suggests all of our problems stem from our involvement in the rest of the world. They don't. Some do, but just as many help us a great deal.

EDIT: Formatting.

[–]Heimdall2061 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Incidentally, I spent some time in Iraq and Eastern Europe, so I tend to get a little tetchy when people who live in the first world complain about their nations' failings as if they were victims. I've come to appreciate my good fortune, and it feels like those people cheapen that. That makes me unhappy.

[–]fiftydowrar 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

As a matter of fact, yes, Japan and RoK are pretty much incapable of defending themselves, seeing as they have a hostile nation with the 4th largest standing army on their doorstep. Without the US maintaining a presence there DPRK would be left unchecked.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]Heimdall2061 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

...you... really didn't read this comment, did you? Ok. Read the comments I posted below. Then go ahead on your rant. I never said anything about the economy. All I said was that America is LEGALLY BOUND to protect certain countries, like Japan and Germany, and that we've developed relationships with other countries based on our mutual interests where we protect them, like Georgia, Taiwan, Israel, the Phillipines, or South Korea, or where we are their military allies and will back them up, like Great Britain, France, or Canada. We have 9/11 because we fulfill our obligations? No, we had 9/11 because some hate-mongerers are more willing to call people names and say assholish shit like that, and tragically enough, people listen.

[–]neilmcc -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

he's still super pro-rich people on his tax plan

If you're a single male and earn 30,000 a year you're still paying several thousands of dollars. Would that not also benefit people who are not considered "rich"?

Moreover, I think rich people that earn their wealth through creating great products deserve to keep their wealth. Why would I want them to pay higher taxes?

[–]Durzo_Blint -2 points-1 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I've said this same thing before, and I'll say it again:

You mean the guy who wants to legalize weed? He has other opinions?

[–]finest_jellybean -5 points-4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What does his view on science have to do with anything. Is science voted on? It would be great to cut the government in half. Too much wasteful spending. Those lost jobs would be opened up in the free market. Ask Greece how having so much of their economy become public sector worked out for them.

[–]serpentjaguar 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

His views on science are important because they give us insight into his critical faculties. To my mind, anyone who is willing to subordinate objective fact to the needs of ideology is not fit to hold public office.

[–]neilmcc 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Paul believes in evolution, and thinks there's no conflict in believing in it and believing in God. This is what he writes in his book 'Liberty Defined':

No one person has perfect knowledge as to man's emergence on this earth...The creationists frown on the evolutionists, and the evolutionists dismiss the creationists as kooky and unscientific. Lost in this struggle are those who look objectively at all the scientific evidence for evolution without feeling any need to reject the notion of an all-powerful, all-knowing Creator. My personal view is that recognizing the validity of an evolutionary process does not support atheism nor should it diminish one's view about God and the universe.

This post explains his position on evolution:

http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/efnii/ron_paul_wikileaks_in_a_free_society_we_are/c17s9cv

Ron Paul doesn't raise his hand when asked at the debate "Who doesn't believe in evolution."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4Cc8t3Zd5E Another good post explaining Ron Paul & evolution:

http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/d4oq5/jon_stewart_plays_a_clip_of_fox_news_saying_we/c0xkhn8

Ron Paul, reddit interview: "billions and billions of years of changes that have occurred, evolutionary changes, that have occurred."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiVy2NbWcgo&t=7m30s

[–]serpentjaguar 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's nice and all, but I didn't actually say anything about what he does or doesn't believe, I simply explained why the views of any candidate on science are important. You made the facile and (for you) convenient assumption that I was referring to his views on evolution. I wasn't. I don't know what they are and am not interested in learning about them since for me, Paul has already disqualified himself as a candidate through his embrace of what I see as a ridiculous set of economic, legal and political ideas. There's a reason his main following is among college kids; it's because they're the only ones (with a few exceptions) naive enough to actually believe in what he's about.

[–]finest_jellybean -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How is holding idea subordinating anything? He doesnt try to put his views on others. He simply states what he believes.

[–]serpentjaguar 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Get back to me when you have a better mastery of the English language. You aren't even close.

[–]biggles86 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

even obama

[–]finest_jellybean 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Obama is definitely up there in horrible ideas and horrible actions.

[–]metallink11 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I used to think Obama was doing a shitty job, but then I realized that he has to try and appeal to a country where half the people are seriously considering these Republican candidates.

[–]ScottCarmichael 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Face it, he had the admiration and praise of the vast majority of Americans going into office and even WON THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE less than a year after being in office and for what? Nothing. Absolutely nothing other than not being Bush.

All Obama accomplished over the last three years was passing a destined-to-fail health care plan no one asked for or wanted in the middle of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. Other than that, his approval ratings have plummeted dramatically and he's lost support from people everywhere. He can't even keep his carefully selected top officials in Washington politics. He never had a plan for anything. He's like the fuggin' Cylons from NuBSG. It was all a tease and smoke and mirrors. The dude is a virus and all his charm is gone.

Oh, he'll probably get re-elected, but not because he's such a great leader or anything...but because a super wealthy Mormon won't win...and even in a fairly balanced battle with Newt, people will stick with the devil they know.

[–]metallink11 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Obama controls most of one branch of the federal government. Everyone on Reddit voted for him because we thought he would bring sweeping changes, but most people voted for him because they were pissed off at the Republicans for tanking the economy and he has to hold on to those people if he wants a second term. In the meantime, he has to fight against a Republican congress that wins if nothing happens, a Democratic party that turns on him the second their own ratings drop, and a Tea Party movement who's idea of a better America is more guns and less black people. Oh, and the entire time, Fox News has been beaming neo-conservative propaganda directly into your grandparent's brains. We elected an idea and were angry when we got a politician, but lets not ignore that he's still a damn good one.

[–]biggles86 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

hahahah, damn, now i feel bad for the poor guy again

[–]Durzo_Blint 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He also has to somehow get laws through a Congress with a super majority of said people and the other house has a slim majority. His entire presidency has been wasted because the Republican Party has been actively and publicly stating multiple times that their one and only objective is getting him out of office and making sure he stays a one term president.

[–]worstcaseontario_ 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

god dammit.. whos turn was it to watch the gate to r/politics?

[–]politicsandothershit 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"The rent is, too damn high"

[–]debatabase 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My best friend and I just decided that this is our new signal for judging people.

[–]AgileFatman 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

All this does is provoke arguments between each-other about who they think is right and wrong. They're all opinions that don't matter. We need to realize that if someone in the White House doesn't get this countries shit together, then we will continue the fast track to economic hell...

[–]Durzo_Blint 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I feel like God pulled out a cosmic boom box and started playing Yakety Sax on repeat until November.

[–]ogurahl 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This has how I've felt for all the elections i've been alive to see.

[–]jakersbossman 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Let's just wait 5000 fucking years for the absolute perfect candidate to come along so we can all suck his dick.

[–]Bio1337 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ron Paul?

[–]MonsieurMollusk 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Italian cat: che cazzo vuoi?

[–]mguzman011 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

r/reactiongifs?

[–]First_Class_Russian 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

upvote for using my favorite gif ever

[–]Boozhau 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The text in the gif is my exact response to this repost.

[–]snorkelheim 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Stop making your cats beg... you disgrace them.. if you want a submisive animal get a bloddy dog fucks sake... the cat is not enjoying begging for whatever you have for it.. dogs do, so get one of them!

[–]Opinionated_Cow 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Laughed out loud.

[–]mrpanadabear 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That cat reminds me of Gordon Ramsay.

[–]myhandsarebananas 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

At this point I'm resigned to just think of someone I can write in and be ironic.

[–]desquibnt 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I really wish we could ban "as an x, this is how I see y" posts

[–]no6969el 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Except Ron Paul.

[–]STRitup89 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I mimicked this 4 times laughing my ass off

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Same thing I think on the rare occasion I attend church... "These people are ALL fucking crazy."

[–]subtlysimpsons 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"We are merely exchanging long protein strings. If you can think of a simpler way, I'd like to hear it."

[–]josieisabunny 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

just take all my up votes

[–]CaptainInternets[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Did this get hidden by a mod? I can't see it in funny anymore :( this was my first successful post...

[–]doubleas21380 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Funny, that is how I view Obama.

[–]atticus75 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This has got to be some kind of hoax... I haven't met a person who doesn't want to stab Romney in the face.

[–]asdzc2000 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This includes obama right?

[–]nomtank 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well...the title says every candidate, so yes.

[–]finest_jellybean -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

With how reddit is so filled with Obamabots, its a legit question.

[–]davidlove 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's Tyra Banks.

[–]vnguyen098 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

this cat is magnificent

[–]turbonerthethird -4 points-3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Except good ol' Ron Paul!

[–]CaptainInternets[S] 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was a big Paul supporter until I learned about what his policies would do to education and scientific progress.

[–]BagOnuts 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

aka- "I liked Ron Paul, until I learned what a 'libertarian' was."

[–]NOACeulemans 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm a little worried myself on what his policies would do for an unregulated banking and financial industry.

[–]royalewihcheese 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Other than all that, though, ideal.

[–]katffro 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Assuming he's elected and Congress agrees with his bills. He can't just go passing bills all willy-nilly without consulting Congress.

[–]Spacehusky 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The president has massive authority to unilaterally do stupid shit via his leadership of the executive branch.

[–]katffro 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not enough authority to completely deregulate the economy/get rid of welfare/completely change the education system.

[–]NaziButler 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Enough to fuck quite a few things up and stymie economic and social progress, however.

[–]katffro 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

True, the president does have authority, just not as much as some people think, and certainly not enough to do as much as people think Ron Paul would do if he was elected.
Presidents do greatly affect other peoples' opinions, though.

[–]Heimdall2061 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Check, meet balance. Spacehusky, meet the entire point of our system. All the branches have a bunch of power. The president's is just more apparent.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So you don't want bankers in a position where they could do anything they want and get away from it? You mean like what happens in the fascist system we've set up here? The FED that Ron Paul wants to dissolve?

Part of deregulation is the decentralization of power(unless it's a regulated limit on growth, which is not happening and shouldn't happen). It's a natural consequence of getting rid of the federal barriers to competition such as handing out incentives to corporations for doing what they should be doing in the first place.

edit: fixed my insomnia-inspired spelling

[–]thesawx 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was a Ron Paul supporter when I found out he was anti-war and pro freedom, and then I learned he wanted to deregulate everything.

[–]ImNakedHowBoutYou -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

...it was shitty government regulations that created the 2008 recession to begin with.

[–]thesawx 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Are you suggesting that it is the government's fault that banks gave out risky mortgages?

[–]ImNakedHowBoutYou 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes, yes I am.

Not only that, but by the Federal Reserve's policy of keeping interest rates excessively low (lower than what the market would put them at), they encouraged banks to loan out more money than they normally would have.

[–]thesawx 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

TBH I am no expert on this matter so I don't really know enough to discuss this with you.

[–]ImNakedHowBoutYou 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fair enough. I was lucky enough to have a professor at my school explain the factors of the 2008 economic collapse to our class in huge detail.

Long story short, the banks were just trying to maximize their profits in the skewed non-"free" market that the government created in the first place with bad regulations. It also didn't help that they knew from the beginning that the government was planning on bailing them out if anything went wrong, so this lead to them taking even more risks that normally they wouldn't have done if the government hadn't been involved.

After the collapse actually happened, there were also a lot of cases of fraud on the banks' part where they forged signatures in order to foreclose on a bunch of homes that they had essentially lost the paperwork to. If anyone should go to jail, it's the bank employees who participated in the foreclosure fraud, but that in itself wasn't a cause of the economic collapse but merely an after-effect.

[–]adriens 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

As opposed to giving the government control of those, where nothing could go wrong.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

We're capable of making strides in education without the defunct Department of education. Desegregation in schools happened completely in schools before the department was created, for instance.

[–]SilentProtagonist 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How do you recognize a Ron Paul supporter on the internet?
Don't worry, he'll RON PAUL 2012!!!!!

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I discourage and downvote spamming when I see it, but support Paul. You don't have to identify with the supporters of something to support that thing, and Paul is no exception.

Also, ~90% of the comments just throwing his name out there like you have aren't coming from supporters. It's a stereotype. His name has become somewhat of a dirty word, and throwing it out there is a tactic that seeks to (1)demoralize supporters, (2)completely overblow the amount of crazy people that support him.

[–]mckelroy88 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Except for the whole part about him being batshit crazy.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

HAHA OH WOW! HAVEN'T HEARD THAT ONE BEFORE!

Seriously, fuck your ad hominem.

[–]mckelroy88 4 points5 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

sorry. I should have said something more constructive.

I meant that Ron Paul has policies that seem pretty crazy in my opinion, given the current circumstances of the world and the nation. I don't hate ron paul (he actually seems like the lesser of two evils between obama and gingrich), but I don't totally love him.

Of course, I'm not here to argue politics. So I'll take your response as a warning to be more careful of my wording next time. Have a nice day.

[–]VLDT -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

None of those men is fit to lead anything but a Klan rally in hell.

[–]ycpa68 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Even Obama?

[–]VLDT -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He's not a candidate for president, he's the only reasonable choice, I consider him in a completely separate category from the Red Scare.

[–]ycpa68 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Um... huh?

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]NotReallyFromTheUK 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Look mom! He doesn't know that filetypes only mean things to humans!

[–]CrystalCanDoThat 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Seen this before, but I luh dis shit.

[–]sebdef -4 points-3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm not supporting Obama because of he's a good candidate, but more because all the others are batshit crazy

[–]arwcrst42 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I hate how people never consider a third party

[–]sebdef 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Let's face it, the Republicans and the Democrats are the only parties that have a chance of winning, maybe if all the other, smaller parties banded together and elected one candidate, things might be a bit different. I hate to sound like a singleminded piece of shit, but it's true, and I might as well support a candidate who has a chance of winning as opposed to this guy

[–]arwcrst42 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

o god, anyone but him

[–]HumanistGeek -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It looks like the cat is giving an imaginary handjob.

[–]Paxjax -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Unrelated, but I think I just found my new favorite gif.

[–]ShhGoToSleep -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I refuse to diffuse into any political banter on here. But, I will say this is the best use of this gif that I've seen yet.

[–]0311 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Let's be realistic, here, Ron Paulians. Every other politician in recent history has lied through their teeth, some while in office, and all of them while on the campaign trail. Who cares what they say? Ron Paul could say, "I completely support the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan" and then send 50,000 more troops there when he gets in office. They aren't held to anything they say while they're running, so why the hell would I believe any of them? Hell, the only reason I think Paul might be a mostly honest man is that he keeps losing.

With that being said, I would probably vote for him if he ever had a serious chance of winning. Why? Because he's different than most politicians I've seen, and it couldn't hurt. And before you say, "His economic policies could destroy the economy and then our economy would be bad!" let me say that all these politicians are crazy and any one of them could do something to destroy the economy or country. Half of them are chomping at the bit to go to war with Iran (personally I'd rather see the economy ruined), and the other half want to go to Iran and then hit North Korea. KILL ALL THE DICTATORS!

I fucking hate politics. And America in its current state.

[–]specialed602 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

repost go fuck yourself