There are a lot of problems with this line of reasoning. First, about as much stuff as I mentioned exists. 9/11 happened and Wolbachia exists.

Your grasping at straws. The differences between what we are discussing is that there is several eye-witness acounts, flight-recordings, records, etc... etc.. of 9/11. Thus with all the accrued data it is safe to say that any 9/11 conspiracy theory is a false and without merit.

You are essentially making a straw man argument which is logical fallacy and thus useless.

Sadly we have none of these for tools or items available to us regarding biblical times. Well nothing besides book scriptures which has obviously not proven to be the best at proving/disproving this.

You can't consistently claim that evidence doesn't matter and at the same time spend it giving what you claim is evidence.

I'm sorry where exactly did I say evidence didn't matter? In the part where you quoted me I said subjective statements. Not subjective "evidence" or anything of the sort.

Evidence very much matters. In fact it matters so much that its the reason why I take the stance I do. Which is that arguing the existence of God, or lack of, is futile and useless as there is no solid evidence to say one way or the other.

^-----NOTICE how I did NOT say evidence does NOT matter.

Sure. Almost every single piece of modern technology works off of transistors which work off of a very predictable and reliable methods of quantum mechanics. Ever use a laser pointer? Lasers work because of the wave particle-duality given by quantum mechanics in an extremely precise fashion. Nuclear weapons? Quantum mechanics impacts how things fission. Pretty much almost all of this really comes down to Schrodinger's equation. Given a quantum state, the equation tells you exactly how the system will evolve through time. In the simplest examples, one can do something like a double-slit experiment and predict from first principles exactly when things will behave like a particle, when it will behave like a wave and when it will do some weird mix. This sort of thing is done in a lot of college intro to QM classes.

Fair enough.

Now here are a couple of examples of my view regarding my previous statement:

You may as well try to argue that there is a right answer (and you know it) for 99% of the shit in Quantum Physics.

• Obviously what I stated before here:

Hell scientists aren't even sure yet if quantum mechanics and general relativity can be formed into a consistent theory.

• The little effect of the Quantum Vacuum on the expansion of the universe.

-Black hole information, Radiation - Is hawking right or is there information ala gauge-gravity duality

-More then 4 dimensions?

-Is the theory of cosmic inflation correct?

-Are multiverses correct and is there any reason to expect other universes that are not observable?

These are just SOME of the MANY things not fully understood by quantum mechanics and physics in general and that have no definitive answer yet.

So I will stick to my 99% statement.