Your only salient point is that PTSD can affect a wide swath of people, not just soldiers. I mentioned soldiers because that is who the person I was replying to was speaking of.

As far as your rant, which sounds like an anti-US rant & pretty much covers any soldier that was involved in a US lead conflict within the last 50 years, I am going to have to disagree with you. There are plenty of decent people who were or are soldiers & there were some conflicts that may have been worth the US getting involved in. Not all soldiers, even in the current stymied conflicts are evil or deserve PTSD. While it sucks that civilians are being put under duress from US interventionism, there have been plenty of non-US entities inflicting PTSD inducing behavior on their own populace for quite some time. Not to mention you also stipulate that PTSD is deserved of the invading force. The invading force is often not as easy to identify as something like the Iraq war. Take the "The Troubles" w/ IRA vs N. Ireland/Britian, Yoguslav War, The Killing Fields of Cambodia, Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka & Tienanmen Square. The US had involvement in some of these conflicts, but the underlying issues were prevalent before the US intervention & the effect of US intervention may not have mattered much. The point is that there were parties already willing to inflict damage on each other & it's not always clear who owns what, who the invading force is & or who is right or wrong.

War is never good(but sometimes it's necessary). War is not the only reason for PTSD & war breaking out doesn't mean the people of that land were free from PTSD causing events before it broke out.