this post was submitted on
954 points (52% like it)
8,453 up votes 7,499 down votes

pics

subscribe2,317,360 readers

8,418 users here now

Looking for an image subreddit with minimal rules? Check out /r/images

A place to share interesting photographs and pictures. Feel free to post your own, but please read the rules first (see below), and note that we are not a catch-all for general images (of screenshots, comics, etc.)

Spoiler code

Please mark spoilers like this:
[text here](/spoiler)

Hover over to read.

Rules

  1. No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, info-graphics and most diagrams. Text (e.g. a URL) serving to credit the original author is exempt.

  2. No gore or porn. NSFW content must be tagged.

  3. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking & harassment will not be tolerated.

  4. No solicitation of votes (including "cake day" posts), posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor, or [FIXED] posts. DAE posts go in /r/DoesAnybodyElse. "Fixed" posts should be added as a comment to the original image.

  5. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to an image hosting website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

  • If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don't delete it as that just makes the filter hate you!

  • If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it!

Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichés/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning.

Links

If your post doesn't meet the above rules, consider submitting it on one of these other subreddits:

Comics  
/r/comics /r/webcomics
/r/vertical /r/f7u12
/r/ragenovels /r/AdviceAtheists
Image macros Screenshots/text
/r/lolcats /r/screenshots
/r/AdviceAnimals /r/desktops
/r/Demotivational /r/facepalm (Facebook)
/r/reactiongifs /r/DesktopDetective
Wallpaper Animals
/r/wallpaper /r/aww
/r/wallpapers /r/cats
The SFWPorn Network /r/TrollingAnimals
  /r/deadpets
  /r/birdpics
  /r/foxes
Photography Un-moderated pics
/r/photography /r/AnythingGoesPics
/r/photocritique /r/images
/r/HDR
/r/windowshots
/r/PictureChallenge
Misc New reddits
/r/misc /r/britpics
/r/gifs Imaginary Network
/r/dataisbeautiful /r/thennnow
/r/picrequests /r/SpecArt
  /r/LookWhoIMet
  /r/timelinecovers
  /r/MemesIRL
  /r/OldSchoolCool
  /r/photoshopbattles

Also check out http://irc.reddit.com

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 292

[–]wingwalker 227 points228 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Cool, but not for $2,388.

[–]MustStopMasturbating 192 points193 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, guess I have to build my own then.

It's funny how a clock made out of nothing but gears, a bell and a bike chain costs more than my car.

[–]punkmasta[!] 33 points34 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I saved this so I can make my own when I have free time because it's pretty cool. This seems simple enough and I don't see why it would cost more than $100.

[–]rebo 50 points51 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This seems simple enough and I don't see why it would cost more than $100.

[–]Baron_Tartarus 124 points125 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While it may seem overpriced, i suspect the "Picasso napkin story" might somewhat explain some of the cost:

Picasso was sitting in a Paris café when an admirer went up to him and asked if he would do a quick sketch for him on a paper napkin. Picasso politely agreed, did a quick sketch and handed back the napkin — but not before asking for a rather large amount of money. The admirer was horrified: “How can you ask so much? It only took you a minute to draw this!” “No”, Picasso replied, “It took me 40 years”

[–]DiscoDonkey 80 points81 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Couldn't have just said "BECAUSE I'M GOD DAMN PICASSO BITCH"

[–]ak416 17 points18 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That is beautiful, I love it!

[–]anonymous123421 42 points43 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But it was a "douche move" by Pablo.

[–]mrthirsty 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't know why, but your use of quotation marks made me lol

[–]Bored_At_Night 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That would be an acceptable reason for charging a slight markup. Not 6 figures of markups. It would also only hold true for pieces that can only be done by a master of a craft. A blacksmith of 10 years who can churn out 50 horseshoes in a day is not going to charge more for a horseshoe than a blacksmith of 5 years who can churn out 30 horseshoes in a day.

[–]enjo13 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Unless the horseshoe produced by the master is measurably better. It's why a Mercedes is more expensive than a Fiat. Value isn't simply measured in the time or materials that went into something.

[–]barrettj 20 points21 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Six figures for a one of a kind Picasso seems fairly reasonable.

[–]Bored_At_Night 26 points27 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'll shit on a napkin in a one-of-a-kind way, and you won't be able to tell the difference.

I may have a piece you might be interested in in my collection.

[–]barrettj 22 points23 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If only you were Picasso and I had six figures and a shit fetish.

[–]bigbigreader 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not something you hear everyday.

[–]brainburger 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]Bored_At_Night 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And what a beautiful example of the folly of the modern art world that is. People would buy blank books if they thought it made them look intelligent or deep.

[–]poops_and_peeps 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A poor comparison though. There are far more Blacksmiths/carpenters/electricians than there are once in a generation artists.

[–]Bored_At_Night -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's a pretty accurate comparison, actually. Go back to the time those artists were alive and they were treated like craftsmen, not like the modern definition of 'It's ready when I say it's ready' artists.

[–]fross 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

TL; DR on all your posts in this thread: You don't understand art.

[–]poops_and_peeps 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Go back to the time those artists were alive and they were treated like craftsmen

Let's go to a time when my obtuse comparison works some 500 years ago...

so when they worked for kings and queens? Yeah that's not what we're talking about, because pieces didn't cost that much then.

When Artists were allowed to practice freely, they gained bargaining power.

I feel poorly for you because you keep trying to prove your point over and over again in this thread, and It just proves how wrong you are because you don't know what you're talking about.

People can charge whatever the hell they want to because other people will pay for it. Case closed.

[–]SpaceSick 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I respectfully disagree with you, only because none of us came up with the idea. Yes, the cost of the materials is probably under 20 bucks, but that's not what you're paying for. You are buying the idea, and since it is whoever came up with's idea they get to set the price.

Now it's a different sorry whether anyone will buy it for such an exorbitant price. That's up to the consumer to decide.

[–]TrueGrey 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But Picasso was talented... I recently saw several of these composition pieces as they came through Atlanta, including this one, in the "modern masters" exhibit alongside Picasso and Warhol and several others.

I must say he impressed me the most, conning people into giving his work merit. I mean sure - its compositionally sound, but no more so than the better than average art school composition project. I guess his first fans never read the emporer's new clothes.

I suppose in the end art is subjective and I am a soulless robot.

[–]devjunk 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"... and imagine all the karma it'll get you on reddit when you go 'Picasso drew this on a napkin for me!'"

[–]snap 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This same analogy is used by designer Paula Scher when remarking on her design for the Citi bank logo: “It took me a few seconds to draw it, but it took me 34 years to learn how to draw it in a few seconds.”

[–]theknightwhosays_nee 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In today's world the Guy would've sued Picasso and won half his estate

[–]Kensin 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

An original work of art should cost a lot of money, but at the same time, I could walk into a poster shop and pick up a copy for $20 so it all works out.

[–]ImJustAnotherGirl 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Touche.

[–]darkwasthenight 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Would you say it seems De Stijmple?

[–]sauerkrautinadrought 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"I could have done that" + "Yeah but you didn't" = Modern art

not saying that to be snarky, I felt the same way you did before I started an art degree in university. i later changed programs to something that would be more... useful to me later on but I learned a lot about why simple stuff like this gets so much respect

[–]cra2reddit 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

someone make an instructable. I want one, too.

[–]lucilletwo 48 points49 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I am in fact already in the process of building one now, using chain, gears from McMasterCarr, a basic clock mechanism to drive it and a bearing to support the chain's weight from Amazon, a bunch of plastic numbers from Michaels (will paint them a metallic brass color for effect) and some spare materials for mounting and aesthetics.

The tricky thing is to get it to run backwards so it makes visual sense - to do this requires opening up the quartz mechanism and flipping around an electromagnet inside. I haven't decided whether i'm going to go this route or not, since if I let it run clockwise (and rearrange the numbers accordingly) I can also add a minute hand to the dial. I've also thought about suspending a second gear freely, nestled in the bottom loop of the chain and adding a minute hand to it.

If anyone's interested, I went with the following chain/sprocket sizes, with McMaster part numbers:

6261K283 Standard ANSI Roller Chain, #25, Single Strand, 1/4" Pitch, Rollerless, .13" Diameter, 3' Length

6793K4 Steel Machinable-Bore Sprocket, for #25 Chain, 1/4" Pitch, 12 Teeth, 1/4" Min Bore

To translate this: each of the gears I ordered have 12 teeth (thus, attaching directly to the minute hand axis on a standard clock mechanism equates to 5 minutes per tooth). The chain is 3 feet long with 4 links per inch, such that there are 144 total links. Each hour it moves by 12 links, and thus moves one full rotation every 12 hours.

I liked this method as well, because it breaks down to simple increments of time for each link. This allows me to augment it later if I like, perhaps marking each 6th link with a dab of paint to easily distinguish the half hour marks.

I also purchased a bearing from Amazon to support the weight of the clock shaft, since the chain adds significant downward force which the clock mechanism was not designed to hold. I'll be sure to post pics when I'm done!

Edit If you decide to attempt this yourself, be sure to purchase a high torque clock movement. Normal clock movements are meant to drive hands weighing just a few grams, and do not have the torque to rotate this much weight (my first attempt failed because of this). I recently purchased a high-torque continuous-drive version for its replacement and am waiting for it to arrive now. Continuous drive is a big help; the weight of the chain will be more or less balanced in each direction, so once it's rotating it doesn't require much force. It's the start and stop action of a normal clock that gets problematic (it takes a fair amount of force to overcome inertia during jerky movement), thus the continuous motion movements are much better equipped for this kind of clock.

[–]iconrunner 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not a pro or anything but I'm thinking if you switched the current direction (red and black wires) the motor should run backwards. Having never actually seen a clock motor this may not be the case, but works for all standard motor designs.

[–]toholio 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you decide to attempt this yourself, be sure to purchase a high torque clock movement. Normal clock movements are meant to drive hands weighing just a few grams, and do not have the torque to rotate this much weight (my first attempt failed because of this).

I'm glad you confirmed this. I said as much the last time I saw this picture posted and had a few people arguing with me about it.

Personally though, I'd go the microcontroller and servo route.

[–]three18ti 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Go on...

[–]toholio 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's been done before. Controlling a servo from something like an Arduino is easy enough. You need a reliable clock source and maybe some sort of indexing to check position but that'd be it.

Or you could buy a 1rph motor like this guy did: http://www.82smugglers.com/gallery/projects/chain_clock/

[–]ozzzzzz22 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Awesome - let us know how it turns out!

[–]chalks777 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

hey future me, remember to read the parent comment and make one of these things!

[–]chalks802701 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hey fuck you past me! I have kids, and a job and a mortgage to pay. Do it yourself you lazy ass so I can hang it on this spot over the mantle behind-- oh there it is. Hey it still works, cool...

[–]Soonermandan 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A much easier way to do this would be to use an Arduino and a stepper motor. You could program it for any length chain and set direction with a single line of code.

[–]lucilletwo 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes - a few people have commented that here and I'm very intrigued, but I don't know much about arduino or coding. I'm an old fashioned mech engineer :)

[–]widgetas 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

With regards the high torque:
I was looking into making one of these - but I couldn't find anywhere selling clocks with high torque.

I know I could google, but do you have a decent source? (hint: UK!)

[–]lucilletwo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hmm not sure about UK sources. I just searched around on google for "high torque clock mechanism" and found a bunch of hits. I purchased mine from clockparts.com.

Several other options have been mentioned that would probably work better, and allow for more control, one involving an arduino + servo setup, and another using a simple 1rph motor.

I'm skeptical that the 1rph motor would actually be able to keep time accurately over days and weeks, but the servo idea is fantastic. Servo motors essentially work by accepting data input that says where to turn to (in discrete positions, as a function of degrees of rotation) rather than a simple power source telling them to turn. Thus you could have a microcontroller with code running that keeps time and just pulses the correct location continuously, and the servo would do it's best to rotate to that position. For instance, you could pulse information to it saying "0 degrees" for the first minute of each hour, then pulse "6 degrees" for the next minute, then 12 and so on. This would prevent any minor mechanical force (friction, weight, etc) from causing the clock to get out of sync over time. It would also allow you to use any size gear you want, with any number of teeth, since you do not rely on the main gear necessarily rotating once per hour. Furthermore you could easily switch from forwards to backwards with a simple bit of code.

[–]sgpope 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm not sure an Arduino would be suitable for this, purely for the fact that most people are going to want to hang it on the wall instead of plugging it in to an outlet (the wire looks crappy). With an Arduino doing nothing but reading a port 4AA batteries only makes it last a few days. See the experiments at http://www.faludi.com/projects/arduino-and-xbee-battery-test-results/ for details.

[–]lucilletwo 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, this setup would only work if you don't mind the cord. I'm currently waiting for a higher torque clock mechanism to attempt my original design again. It runs on a C battery, which should last it a while.

[–]widgetas 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Cheer guv!

I'll look into it :)

[–]sgpope 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Do you have a link to the bearing you bought?

[–]lucilletwo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I purchased this one: http://www.amazon.com/Shielded-Bearing-Miniature-Bearings-VXB/dp/B002BBCOD2

I'm waiting for the new mechanism to arrive to start installing

[–]sgpope 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm confused. Are you planning on having the motor turn the inside of the bearing with the sprocket on the outside of the bearing?

[–]lucilletwo 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Reddit Enhancement SuiteThere are two main forces that you have to deal with to make this clock work:

  1. The moment of inertia, aka the Angular Momentum of the sprocket and chain system. Normal clock hands weigh only a few grams, and while they are fairly long (which increases the moment arm) their minimal weight means the clock does not have to exert much force to turn them. They are also typically balanced with the center of gravity being at the axis, which means the force need to turn them does not vary much with the time of day. Our setup is going to weigh significantly more, and have a much higher moment of inertia, requiring significantly more torque to accelerate and decelerate the sprocket for each tick of the clock. This causes the clock to run slow, decreases battery life and potentially increases wear and tear on the delicate parts in the mechanism over time. My plan counteracts this in two ways, first by using a high torque mechanism, designed for large, heavy clock arms. Secondly, I went with a continuous drive version, rather than one which visibly "ticks", which reduces the force required to only that needed to overcome friction, since it is not accelerating and decelerating the sprocket during each tick.

  2. Vertical force, perpendicular to the axis, applied downwards at the gear. Here's a diagram I threw together. The Black box is the mechanism, and it is anchored to the large yellow block (the mounting structure of the clock - in this case I'm using wood). As you can see there are three lines extending from the mechanism; these represent the coaxial shafts of the clock - red (hours), green (minutes) and blue (seconds) which normally would have hands fixed to them. For this clock the only one we will be using is the green minute axis, which makes one full rotation each hour. The pink shape is the gear, which is attached to this axis. The part extending above and below represents the teeth, from which the chain will hang. This presents a problem, because the clock was never designed to handle this amount of mass suspended from it. This weight pushes the green minute tube against inside wall of the hour tube (causing friction), and puts a lopsided downward force on the gears within the mechanism, which are only designed to apply rotational force to the axis. The bearing (Grey, around the green minute tube) is there to counteract this force, by supporting the green tube in such a way that it can still rotate freely while holding up the extra weight of the sprocket and chain. Without it, the force caused by these weights would be placed on the clock mechanism and axis, rather than on the surrounding support structure.

Does this make sense?

Furthermore, we do not care about the red and blue hour and second hands, but we need to allow them to rotate freely as well, since they are all geared together within the mechanism. I'm still waiting for my high torque mechanism to arrive, and i'll put it all together at that point. I initially tried just attaching the sprocket to the minute hand of my first mechanism (very cheap, flimsy one made for a wall clock), but the forces described above easily overwhelmed it.

[–]sgpope 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Brilliant! Thanks SO much for this!

[–]imkaneforever 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Please do, post results!

[–]Dekzter 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Forget about the clock, you need a new car!

[–]Wardbun 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You could even make it run in the right direction.

[–]BitRex 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Cheap car represent! Mine dumps gas out the top when I go around corners with a full tank. :O

[–]sgpope 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Agreed. Anybody know how to build something that looks nice and rustic like that bell? Anything I can cover a plastic bowl with maybe?

[–]monkeyuprising 15 points16 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is a pretty sweet alternative for $195-235: http://www.chainclocks.com/

I bought one of his early prototype models. It looks great and keeps perfect time.

[–]Ag-E 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Boy I wish I had $225 to burn, though I don't know that making one would be all that difficult. Finding out how fast to have the motor spin to keep perfect time would be the hardest part I should think, and I'm sure that's already been figured out for some other application.

[–]wrong_assumption 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just get an very accurate servo motor and work it out with simple algebra.

[–]golem91488 24 points25 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Or, you know, take a motor from a clock. Turns out they keep pretty good time.

[–]aspbergerinparadise 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I would worry that most clock motors are not powerful enough to spin a rather heavy chain.

[–]Tibyon 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, you would have to find one with a fairly powerful motor. It would probably be a 50 dollar clock though.

[–]lucilletwo 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm building one now, and this is a valid concern. My first attempt used a standard clock mechanism with flimsy lightweight hands, and could not provide enough force to keep time driving a heavy chain.

I purchased a high torque continuous drive version for a replacement and am waiting for it to arrive now - it was about 25 bucks with shipping. Continuous drive is key here too; the weight will be more or less balanced in each direction, so once it's rotating it doesn't require much force. It's the start and stop action of a normal clock that gets problematic, thus the continuous motion movements are much better equipped for this kind of task.

[–]R0b0t1 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I would have just bought a stepper motor and made a really simple driver circuit with a microcontroller and real time clock module.

[–]gibson_ 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That was my first thought too...but I think the high torque module would be cheaper...

Around $12 for the stepper, another $15 for the RTC module, another $12 for the stepper controller, a couple of dollars for an attiny.

All in around $45 + shipping

[–]R0b0t1 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Stepper controller...? Use four MOSFETs. I will admit the RTC module is a bit pricy, but you might be able to use the crystal out of a clock you already have.

[–]usbcd36 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That would cause you to end up with the flaw from the original clock, which is worth fixing. Clock motors turn clockwise (…duh) so that the hands move clockwise around the face, but when you're essentially rotating the face around the hands, you need it to turn anti-clockwise.

This causes the clock to be harder to read, since it has to be read backwards from how we conventionally read clocks.

[–]eFame 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Can you make motor face backwards?

[–]usbcd36 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You could reverse the terminals of the motor, or reverse the permanent magnet's direction. I remember seeing an article on a guy doing this to his travel alarm clocks (by flipping the pole piece assembly over, I believe), though it may have been pre-internet.

[–]gibson_ 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You can buy a high torque clock mechanism for about $10. They're used for those huge clocks that people have on the walls in their kitchen.

[–]PFisken 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I would consider it if there were any way to contact them (and it doesn't seem to be). I could find no phone number or e-mail.

[–]monkeyuprising 2 points3 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Try his old store (where I bought the prototype) at needlesslycomplex.com. He's a pretty stand-up guy and went out of his way to make me happy.

EDIT: Or here: http://www.ponoko.com/build-your-own/furniture/timing-chain-6478 Note that the price was jacked up to $1000.00 because he took on a ton of orders and couldn't keep up. I am pretty sure he isn't taking orders through Ponoko anymore.

[–]omnidirectional 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This price seems about right.

I'd LOVE to have this style of clock in my life.

I guess that the next step is to make a pendulum-based version.

[–]grimaldar 18 points19 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Interesting but how does it "at first glance appear to be ten to eleven"? Looks about 10 minutes after to me.

[–]bryandenny71 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's backwards IMO. If a normal clockhand passes over the number from left to right (clockwise), then the intuitive thinking would be to have the numbers on the chain moving right to left (counterclockwise) to give the same effect. These Chainclocks have it the right way.

[–]trentbeard 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Our brains automatically assume that CLOCKS will run in a CLOCKWISE direction. However, as you can see, the numbers go in ascending order if you follow the clock in a counter clockwise motion. SO, the normal person would assume that since it is slightly left of eleven, it is almost to eleven. However, this clock runs counterclockwise. This is because the pivot point is moving the clock around itsself, as opposed to the standard clock in which the clock stays stationary and the hands move.

[–]Illlumin 19 points20 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

what kind of timefoolery is this?

[–]mackmgg 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I guess my brain interpreted it differently, because I didn't get how it was looked like ten to eleven either. I saw the "11" to be almost like the minute hand, and it was pointing more towards 10 minutes than 50.

[–]peon47 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Wow, what an idiotic review. You can tell at a glance that it's between 11 and 12 on that clock. There's nothing "backwards" about it.

[–]Ravengenocide 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, I didn't quite get that part too. What did he really mean with that statement?

[–]SophisticatedVagrant 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't understand what that Wired author is finding so difficult. If you are assuming that it is 11 o'clock when the 11 is at the very top, a brief look at how the clock moves (/how the numbers are ordered) makes it a very easy to figure out what time it is.

Also, you could say that in the picture, the orientation 11 is pointing roughly towards where the '10 minutes past' mark would be for a regular clock face.

[–]SI_FTW 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

.hcum naem t'nseod taht tub ,ti daer ylisae neht dna sdrawkcab nettirw si ecnetnes siht ees nac uoy ecnalg kciuq a htiW

Good design should conform to expectations unless there is a good reason not to. If you see the 11 the usual assumptions is that to the left will be the 10 and on the right the 12, there was no reason to change this up other than to save the effort of reversing the rotation.

Its true you would get use to it very quickly but still it is not intuitive.

[–]SophisticatedVagrant 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I would have to disagree. To me, having the sprocket rotating clockwise is intuitive, so the whole clock was immediately intuitive to me. I did not even think about interpreting it differently until I saw the Wired article, and I really had to think to understand what the author was saying.

But, it takes lots of different people to make the world go... 'round...

[–]RamsesA 0 points1 point ago

If we treat the gear as a "hand," then the numbers are moving clockwise around the hand's frame of reference, whereas on a normal clock the numbers would be moving counter-clockwise around the same frame of reference. I felt this reversal to be a bit confusing.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

With products outside the mass reproduction market whose appearance/functionality have gone through the hands of a talented industrial/product designer, the final price tag tends to be influenced. So you're not just paying for a product, but the time that went into designing it too.

[–]lucilletwo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is a more than fair assessment. This clock is not just a functional commodity, it's a unique work of art that took talent and creativity, as well as a certain amount of trial and error to put together. I'm building one now and I've put quite a few hours of time into picking my components, ordering, realizing the flaws, reordering, building, rebuilding, etc. Clocks don't just have to look good, they have to keep time... and that's no simple task when the hands are replaced with a heavy steel chain.

[–]trigun0x2 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

we need china.

[–]JaniyaSayl 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I love the way that article is written!

[–]lebean 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While the numbers seem to run in the correct direction, when it comes to reckoning minutes you have to read backwards. The time shown in the picture is around ten past eleven, but at first glance appears to be ten to eleven.

So wrong. What kind of crack is the Wired author on to be able to look at that picture and think "at first glance appears to be ten to eleven"? It's very obvious with less than a two second glance that it's a bit past 11, but still a while until 11:30 or 12.

[–]0really 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm happy and sad this is the top comment. Happy, because I saw this and wanted to buy one. Sad, because I can't buy one.

[–]ludforgotpw1120 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Then I guess it isn't really that simple.

[–]PurdieFan 22 points23 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]432 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

in-fucking-genius!

[–]redfive5tandingby 38 points39 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"What time is it?"

"Eh, it's about 11 and two links o'clock."

[–]swizzcheez 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So, it's homage to "Zelda: A Link to the Past"?

[–]GregOttawa 20 points21 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]villin609 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

...two links o'clock

...bash some pots

sweet rhymes man.

[–]Bidonet 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You mean two zeldas!

[–]alexgeek 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

WHAT IF ZELDA WAS A GIRL?

[–]atl2rva 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

that would be dumb... Like saying Samus is a girl.

[–]bitch_im_a_lion 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You guys are idiots, Link is the main character, Just like Halo. I love that guy.

[–]sauerkrautinadrought 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

why are people downvoting you when you were clearly being facetious

[–]RelevantKanyeTweet 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]OldByrne 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

ive never made anything like that before but im pretty sure i could make one that turns the right way, for a fraction of the cost, in a fraction of the time it takes to be delivered. game on

[–]GreyMage 30 points31 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And it could go to 13. That's one more than most clocks.

[–]shillbert 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Why don't you just make "12" later and make 12 be the top number and make that a little later?

[–]GreyMage 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

...Because it could go to 13.

[–]piraterum 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Rotating counter clockwise was throwing me off.

[–]infiniteri 29 points30 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

did anyone else notice that the second link said "the greatest cock" instead of "the greatest clock"?
or perhaps it's intentional. I'm afraid to click on it.

[–]shapsai42 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

the guy did it on purpose for da karma

[–]Guard01 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, I did it on purpose.

[–]PureClass 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It was a glorious day for us though, I remember it fondley.

[–]andrewsmith1986 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/hxmxv/the_greatest_cock/c1z998c

He did it, copying my earlier submission, knowing that it would whore karma well.

[–]beardedboywonder 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]lsdsoundsystem 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Afraid to dick on it.

FTFY

[–]three18ti 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]spdorsey 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It may be a repost, but it's no less interesting.

[–]ReverendY 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, I never saw it before.

[–]mr_bijae 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

OMG, a repost... NFW!!! UPVOTE for sleuthing out the original reposts

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

my cat would destroy this

[–]assassin10 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While the numbers seem to run in the correct direction, when it comes to reckoning minutes you have to read backwards. The time shown in the picture is around ten past eleven, but at first glance appears to be ten to eleven.

I don't really see the problem. It's not that hard to see that it's between 11 and 12 so I don't understand why you would think it's between 10 and 11.

[–]Reclaim3r 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Because at first glance you only look at the number nearest to the top and assume it's going in a clockwise direction. It's only after you look at the surrounding numbers that you realize it's going counter-clockwise.

[–]Willeth 18 points19 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And honestly, I don't see why it's designed this way. It would be trivial to make it run in the opposite direction and read like one would expect.

[–]Cayou 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I spontaneously read it as ten past eleven, since I'm assuming that the numbers go clockwise.

[–]SophisticatedVagrant 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's going clockwise...

[–]Reclaim3r 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sorry, I meant the numbers not the chain itself.

[–]writesomethingwitty 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The numbers are also going clockwise, like the chain. If you look at the wheel's movement relative to the chain, it appears to be moving counter-clockwise.

Anyway, I have to agree with you, it seems a bit odd that it's spinning in that direction. My initial reaction was to look at the chain as static and imagine the wheel moving on the chain.

[–]flaminkirby 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I thought this was pretty intuitive; the numbers move from left-to-right along the top, as english speakers prefer things to do. Plus, when its 11:15, the 11 is pointing to the right (where the minute hand would be on a regular clock). Similarly, when it's quarter-to-the-hour, the hour coming up points to the left, just like the minute hand would.

[–]RAAFStupot 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I fail to see how the top sprocket moves in an anti-clockwise direction.

Assuming the cursor (ie reading point) of the clock is the 'up' position, the number 11 has just passed the cursor, and the number 12 is next.

[–]andrewsmith1986 19 points20 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]867-5308 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That much for something I could build in a machine shop in a few hours? Fuck that shit.

[–]nooodl 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

1) Build some

2) Ebay them for $2,330...

4) Profit

[–]jerichoholic1 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I read "Simple, yet amazing cock".

[–]N0V0w3ls 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I saw this way back when it was a repost on Digg.

[–]tghGaz 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How many times is reddit going to show me this clock?

[–]patrickaaron 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This would be extremely easy to make, and the parts extremely easy to find. I'm assuming the number going around is the minute hand, I'm sure some people wouldn't "Get it".

[–]OhShitASni 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

DAE think the numbers and rotation should be reversed?

[–]theworsttasteinmusic 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My cats would have that shit on the floor in 10 seconds flat.

[–]mjwarsocki 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hey look, it's the top of the hour!

[–]goodolarchie 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Is it odd that I think it should go counter-clockwise (with the numbers reversed)?

[–]_Old_Greg 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This here is similar but designed by a hot chick, harder to read and more arty.

http://www.thorunndesign.com/sasaclock8.html

[–]_Old_Greg 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"The Sasa Clock aims to bring the benefits of ancient African concepts of time to our modern lives. Rather than being dominated by time, it encourages us to relax and let time flow. "Sasa", in African Kiswahili culture, means "What is now".

The time is read from the color coded necklace. Each bead represents a 5 minute increment. As the wheel turns, every 5 minutes a bead drops down the cord. Orange beads represent hours, gold and silver beads represent noon and midnight. To tell the time, simply find the gold or silver bead, count the orange "hour" beads and then the blue "minute" beads until the last one to have slipped down the cord.

By minimizing the focus on individual minutes we can slow down and enjoy the present.

To "stop time", remove the beads and wear them proudly, as a statement that you are in control of your own minutes."

[–]opalextra 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I know that girl, I always thought that idea was very original... now I'm not so sure... who did it first

[–]WhitePostIt 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Clever Girl.

Even more clever: making your own and spending only maybe $50, if even.

[–]Olufsson 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it should go the other way to be clearer

[–]otoolem 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This image is such an old repost - it was a quarter to seven the first time I saw it.

[–]BATMAN-cucumbers 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Awesome concept. Not so sure about the clockwise gear rotation though, I'd've gone with a counter-clockwise chain rotation to keep a more customary interface.

[–]byrobot 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This clock: for when you need to know it's "11ish."

[–]Tubasaurus 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not much more simple than a regular analog clock and looks like shit.

[–]VickysAsleep 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"The greatest cock"

[–]Scarjaka 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I misread the title.

But, I do say, that is a neat time telling device!

[–]timd234 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

REPOST

[–]tjblue 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I want one.

[–]SlanskyRex 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Definitely read this as "cock". I guess the clock is okay too.

[–]criminimina1 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

oh... CLOCK... oops.

[–]worriedlove 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It messes with my mental clock.

[–]Janky_Pants 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Would that clock read as 11:05 then?

[–]FreeThinker76 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was going to ask this (actually looked more like 11:10).

[–]xdzgor 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Is that PM or AM?

[–]enjoyingtheride 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]mouseturd 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

comment

[–]passwordisgullible 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ohhhh, I want this sooo bad.

[–]KevTehNev 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My cat would break that within the hour I brought it home.

[–]thethirdi 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Oh..cLock. Sad face.

[–]Usernames_Suck 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I thought it said "Simple, yet amazing lock". I was so confused.

[–]C1CP7_TROLLZ 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I wish i could upvote this a million times

[–]apple_pr_office 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"guysguy",

We would kindly ask of you to remove this photo from reddit. We feel it violates some of our patents relating to the look and feel of the digits on the iOS lock screen.

Thank you for understanding.

Apple™ PR

To everyone else, please take a moment to fill out a brief survey about our products.

[–]dan2737 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So... Who else read it wrong?

[–]cookiebox123 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I thought it said cock...

[–]jigby61 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yea but if it gets tangled or falls, you won't know what time it is.

[–]SgtMittens 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Maybe this is just me being an overtired idiot, but I can't figure out how to tell the time on that thing. Anyone care to explain?

[–]bearsa113609 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How much would people pay for one?
As an engineer that could easily be assembled, parts and labor, for around $80 a unit.

[–]babybonobo 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think it's be more intuitive if the gear rotated counterclock wise instead.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

More a piece of art than a clock IMO, since you can't tell the precise time.

[–]Markymark36 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Unfortunately, it looks like the designer, Andreas Dober, cheaped out and just picked up a standard, clockwise-running movement. Take a look. While the numbers seem to run in the correct direction, when it comes to reckoning minutes you have to read backwards. The time shown in the picture is around ten past eleven, but at first glance appears to be ten to eleven.

The clock makes sense to me.

[–]barnun 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I keep reading this in passing as "simple yet amazing cock" and I keep thinking that a male GW post actually made my front page

[–]Whatsabloopie 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What time is it? 11. What time is it now(10 mins later)? 11. What time is it now(50 mins later)? 11. What time is it now? HAPPY NEW YEARS!!! Wtf

[–]misplacedpomegranate 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"Time is a wealth of change, but the clock in its parody makes it mere change and no wealth."

[–]SeaTwertle 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I like how the article calls it "Confusing Bike Chain Clock" because the numbers one through twelve going in a circle are very, very hard to follow.

[–]AsskickMcGee 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I have the same thing, but without the "l".

[–]Albinofish 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I joined Reddit and the the first thing that gets my attention is a clock.

[–]SaikoGekido 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Simple, yet amazing cock

[–]youfrenchgreat 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But...what time is it?

[–]shadetreephilosopher 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"What time is?"
"One and half links past."

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This would be so prone to trolling. Just lift the fucking chain.

[–]sigmat 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I feel like the numbers should be in opposite order, 11 -> 12 -> 1

[–]daMannn 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

thats really nice!

[–]ksaj 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

With a long enough chain, it would be easy to add a minute hand to this.

[–]BackwardsdrawkcaB 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What direction does it spin?

[–]LoopTransmission 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I hypothesize counterclockwise

[–]Level_75_Zapdos 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Anybody else read this as "cock"?

[–]alltimeisrelative 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

re-post more.

[–]Rockerdude34 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

inb4 "I read this as simple yet amazing cock"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Awesome clock

[–]wonderwoman888 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It looks sad and depressing. Reminds me of the painting The Persistence of Memory

[–]froomja 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Totally want one, hmm... I will add that to my list of shit to blow my tax return on.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

why does the chain go clockwise? it should go counterclockwise like reading direction

[–]BIueBlaze 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Wow, what a beautiful piece.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Oh, cool, this picture again. It hasn't been on the front page for at least a week, I was starting to think I would never see it again.