use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g.reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, community...
~67 users here now
Sorting Hat:
To get a house crest by your username, and to gain access to your house subreddit/common room, please follow these instructions.
September 2012 House Points
Current Assignment
TBA
Next Text-Only Week:
Next Theme Day:
To do this: omg Harry is a wizard
Write this: [omg Harry is a wizard](/spoiler)
September Birthdays:
Sep. 10 - Chris Columbus (54)
Sep. 19 - Hermione Granger (33)
Sep. 22 - Tom Felton (25)
Sep. 25 - Garrick Ollivander (?)
Resources
Friends
* The Casual Vacancy is JKR's new book, coming to bookstores near you September 27, 2012!
NOTE: r/harrypotter official rules
reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›
Way to be subtle Daniel (i.imgur.com)
submitted 8 months ago by Clark-Kent
[–]AngryProle 25 points26 points27 points 8 months ago
Maybe he's just looking at her dresses?
[–]chimpwizard[Corazón de León] 20 points21 points22 points 8 months ago
That's the excuse I use
[–]battleship61Remus Lupin 12 points13 points14 points 8 months ago
excellent save sir
[–]StalinsLastStand 25 points26 points27 points 8 months ago
Let's be honest, we'd all be right there too:
source: karmadecay
[–]brodyqc 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
I want to see the karmadecay report in every comment section on every entry.
[–]ElToroFuerte 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
I like that the top comment in the first two and the second top comment in the last one are all the same comment as the top comment in this thread.
[–]Cameroon62 8 points9 points10 points 8 months ago
Daniel seems to have a one-track mind.
[–]jigby61 23 points24 points25 points 8 months ago
I'm telling Ron!
[–]jdwag101 33 points34 points35 points 8 months ago
He is just doing what we all are doing, except he's just a little closer.
[–]90kandi 58 points59 points60 points 8 months ago
to be fair, in the first one i think he is just leaning in to hear something watson is saying. also to be fair, there isnt much to look at anyways
[–]crayonbox 76 points77 points78 points 8 months ago
To be fair, when it's Emma Watson, there will always be enough to look at.
[–]Sunfire91 2 points3 points4 points 8 months ago
From these pictures, I think it's safe to say we can put the gay rumors to rest O.O
[–]Emphursis 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
I think he does to make everyone jealous :|
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] 14 points15 points16 points 8 months ago*
I'm sorry girls, but men are not douches for looking [I said looking not staring] at that which they are naturally attracted to, and that [some women who choose to wear revealing clothing] women put on show.
http://officeforward.com/main/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/men-can-play-this-game-too.jpeg
EDIT: This has turned into some kind of bash the guy we all think is some kind of woman-hater. I'm a gender equalitist who doesn't agree with being labelled a pervert when women where revealing clothing and scorn a look from a single male. If this is so wrong, you're the immoral one.
EDIT: The never-ending stream of downvotes on my comments correcting your frankly annoying misinterpretation of my opinion is disheartening. Do you always continue to berate people that try to explain that what they've said is not what you've inferred? You do your houses no justice.
[–]Commercialtalk 36 points37 points38 points 8 months ago
I dunno if id say natural. the sexualization of breast is a Western thing
[–]crayonbox 55 points56 points57 points 8 months ago
This and the fact that women, Emma in this case, aren't "putting on a show." This carries numerous troubling implications regarding the idea that men are entitled to see a women's body. In this particular senario, Emma is wearing dresses that could hardly be considered "putting on a show."
[–]Commercialtalk 16 points17 points18 points 8 months ago
Thank you! All these comments were a bit troubling. But nice to know there's a voice of reason
[–]crayonbox 4 points5 points6 points 8 months ago
Yup. A few of the comments range from either defending Dan or making negative comments about Emma's body. Both of which aren't necessary at all. It's an amusing picture, but I'm kinda surprised at the reaction it's incited on the page.
[–]Friendlyvoices 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
The idea is not a show, rather that it is indeed acceptable since it happens frequently. The knowledge of knowing that men will stare and look at woman if they wear specific outfits should deter some one if they actually care about people staring. In essence you put on a show to attract some one's attention. Like a peacock does when it shows it's plume. You're wearing the clothing for a reason, it's generally expected that people will look so why get upset? Are not your intentions to attract some one? If not, then why wear the clothing that attracts people? (To go to an extreme, it would be like running outside naked and getting mad when some one notices.)
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 months ago
I didn't say she was, I was referring to some women.
[–]Be_AreRaving-claw 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
Ahem http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KEKoc3Iim8k#!
[–]Commercialtalk -1 points0 points1 point 8 months ago
What I meant to say was, it's a culture thing
[–]gogog0 -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 months ago
the sexualization of breast is a Western thing
please don't say this like its a well known fact. Its a sociological theory not generally accepted.
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] -10 points-9 points-8 points 8 months ago
It's near indistinguishable from natural tendencies.
[–]Commercialtalk 8 points9 points10 points 8 months ago
Because its so engrained into western society.
[–]crayonbox -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 months ago
That doesn't mean that it's not a natural tendency. It speaks more about the culture effects. Because of this, the idea that "men are not douches for looking at that which they are naturally attracted to" isn't really appropriate. Also, regardless of it being a natural or cultural preference, there's no excuse for that type of behavior in general.
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] -11 points-10 points-9 points 8 months ago
There's no excuse for putting it on display and not expecting someone to look.
HEY DON'T LOOK MY NYE FIREWORKS YOU PERVERT!
[–]crayonbox 6 points7 points8 points 8 months ago
I'll just repeat myself for what I said in response to a comment below. I'm not sure if you are trolling or simply don't understand, in either case:
This carries numerous troubling implications regarding the idea that men are entitled to see a women's body. In this particular senario, Emma is wearing dresses that could hardly be considered "putting on a show."
[–]annul[Ravenclaw Chaser] 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago
they most certainly are entitled to look at any part of a clothed woman's body. they most certainly are entitled to look at any part intentionally exposed by the woman.
[–]crayonbox 3 points4 points5 points 8 months ago
Yes, of course. And women are entitled dress how they want. It's when the assumption is that a woman is exposing a part of her body (leg, cleavage, arm, hand) for a man's viewing, which is what is implied when someone types "putting it on display" - that's when it becomes troubling and incorrect - at least for me.
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago
I didn't say they did have a right to see a woman's body, that would be stupid, and I didn't mean this scenario I meant in general when women wear revealing clothing and act offended when people look.
[–]Supertrinko 10 points11 points12 points 8 months ago*
I don't think that just because women wear clothes that show cleavage means they want to "put on a show" or attract attention to their breasts. It's just the fashion. Do you find hidden motives to every fashion trend?
With that said, I think looking at breasts should be treated the same as how you'd stare at any part of a person. Looking is fine, but staring? Well staring is weird no matter what part of the person you're looking at. And not paying the person the proper attention while conversing with them because you're letting your attraction to a body part of theirs distract you is just rude.
[–]affluenza 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
SRS on the warpath again. Pathetic.
[–]Supertrinko 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago
Agreed.
[–]qmriis -1 points0 points1 point 8 months ago
Yes, it is.
[–]Friendlyvoices -1 points0 points1 point 8 months ago
Well this is interesting. It seems like no one is reading the post before commenting. Anywho, from what I can gather, the poster of this comment is saying that woman should expect people to look and stare. You cant control what people do in response to what you wear. One man may turn is head to look, another may throw up into his hat. Hopefully, when you are putting on clothing, you are attempting to dress in a way that will attract a male and not turn them away.
With that stated, why be upset when the desired results occur? Are you being treated like a piece of meat, or are you just being treated the way you intended to be treated? If you wear a low cut shirt to show off your girls, are you wearing it because fashion dictates you do, or are you doing it because you want to have a man notice? If it's because of fashion, you are still doing it to attract a male, weather you realize it or not. Logically, you don't follow fashion because of fashions sake. You follow fashion to look good and not be deviant of fashion norms. Why do you think the rag wearing fad of hipsters became popular? It doesn't look good, but it's a fashion norm, and for some reason, guys think it's attractive.
But I digress, to come back to the whole staring idea. Men are naturally attracted to other men/woman. They are going to look, and if they lack clout, will most likely stare. There's no getting around it. You know it's going to happen and will usually only get upset if some one you don't want to notice, notices. I would continue, but I'm just getting tired of typing and want a sandwich.
Your assumption is that all women who dress in such ways do it to attract the attention of males (or females for those that are attracted to them).
Consider those that are shunned by other women for not wearing such revealing clothing.
[–]Friendlyvoices 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago
Also consider those that are shunned for wearing such revealing clothing. Peer pressure plays a roll on both sides. One group of people will shun another group's ideas or interests. (Christians and atheists)
The choice of which group you want to follow is entirely up to the individual. Does she follow the group of the girl who wear low cut revealing shirts, or the one that dress in frilly dresses with ribbons on them?
Except that those who wear revealing clothes are the far larger group. So peer pressure from them is far more effective.
Only if you allow it to be. Peer pressure is only effective if the peers pressuring you mean anything to you. If you have something to gain from them, then peer pressure is more effective.
[–]Supertrinko -2 points-1 points0 points 8 months ago
Why are you now talking about the effectiveness of peer pressure? Entirely off the topic.
[–]Friendlyvoices 2 points3 points4 points 8 months ago
Supertrinko: "Your assumption is that all women who dress in such ways do it to attract the attention of males (or females for those that are attracted to them).
Consider those that are shunned by other women for not wearing such revealing clothing."
This is what is known as peer pressure. It's only been 30 minutes, try not to forget what you post.
[–]Supertrinko -1 points0 points1 point 8 months ago
I was never speaking of the effectiveness of peer pressure.
[–]outwrangle 20 points21 points22 points 8 months ago
women being in public = women putting on a show
Am I right?
[–]ElToroFuerte -7 points-6 points-5 points 8 months ago
No. Women who wear revealing clothing know what's being revealed, cleavage is very common. If they don't want the attention their revealed attractive body gets then they shouldn't necessarily reveal them. (one more reveal). I don't like when I catch guys looking at mine so I wear crew neck shirts and lots of layers to hide them. But some friends of mine love their cleavage and love to wear shirts that show it off. All women are different.
The parent comment was talking about women in general, there was no mention of Emma Watson's name at all. She's clearly a classy lady and wears clothes that don't show off her lady bits. But if a man finds you attractive, you're wearing a low cut shirt and he finds your boobies to be attractive, then don't call him a douche just because you're revealing your decolletage to the world and you happen to catch him looking. It happens.
Besides, the comment may have been worded wrong as it has generated a slew of misinterpreted responses, but this is not the gist of the comment at all. These photos are all out of context so the comment and the photos don't exactly relate too well.
[–]suprisename 14 points15 points16 points 8 months ago
I don't like when I catch guys looking at mine so I wear crew neck shirts and lots of layers to hide them.
You feel like you can't show any skin below the neck and you can't see anything wrong with this?
Also, are you seriously implying that he didn't make that comment in reference to this picture?
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 months ago
Excuse me, but there is one person who knows precisely whether he referenced the picture or not and that's me. Downvotes are not my concern, so I have nothing to gain through lying. So, if you choose to not believe me when I say I did not mean the picture then that's good for you.
[–]suprisename 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago
hahhaha oh wow... how old are you dude?
[–]ElToroFuerte -2 points-1 points0 points 8 months ago
Look, I do show teh skinz, but I'm not into getting people to look at my boobs. But I see nothing wrong with the comment. All the poster said was that if you dress in a way that warrants attention, don't think the one looking is a douche bag. People look. You can't control where others eyes look so you shouldn't be upset when they do. It happens.
The photo doesn't show E. Watson's boobs hanging out of her dresses, it just shows four photos taken out of context to make it look like D. Radcliffe was looking at her. The comment doesn't mention the OP's photo at all, it was just a response to the responses about the photo.
The comment doesn't mention the OP's photo at all
Implying that he just decided to post that in this thread for shits and gigs? Of course he was talking about the photo.
it was just a response to the responses about the photo.
Which responses? The only reason that this discussion was even started was because he decided he needed to defend the honour of creepy dudes errywhere.
[–]ElToroFuerte 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago
Look, have your internet argument win. Clearly everyone here is here to hate on two people who have an opinion vastly different from yours. No amount of my replying to you will show you what I mean. Continue to downvote me because you don't agree with what I say. I stand by what I said, argue all you want but you can have this.
Do you do this my team vs. their team thing whenever you have a disagreement? And going "hey I don't have a counter-argument, but I'm still right" is pretty ... not good.
No. I'm tired of arguing over something that's been tried and tested. Enjoy.
[–]outwrangle -2 points-1 points0 points 8 months ago
They want people to think they are attractive. They don't want to be treated like they are a piece of meat on public display. Why is this so hard to understand?
[–]ElToroFuerte 3 points4 points5 points 8 months ago
Because they aren't pieces of meat. Yeah, sure you'll have the ones who stare just to stare and yes, they treat you like that. But the majority of lookers look to admire and move on. Majority. If you get creeped out because someone's looking at you in a way you don't like then don't dress that way. You can dress modestly and still dress attractively. Your cleavage, your anything does not make you attractive. You can't make people think you are attractive, they either think you are or you aren't their type. If you aren't and the only thing going for you is your boobs then by all means show them off if it's all you have. 8
[–]outwrangle 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago
It's okay to look. There's just a line between "acceptable" and "creepy" that really needs to be pointed out. You can look a girl over once and that's totally fine, but it's when you stare or when you look more often than necessary that it starts to get creepy. I'm sorry for the communication issue.
However, I guess I should point out that how you dress does effect how attractive you are. Makeup makes your face more attractive by evening out the tones and making it more symmetrical. The type of bra a woman wears can make her breasts more prominent or lift them up higher. The cut of her top and her bottom will show the right amount of skin to accentuate her positive traits. The shoes are important because they change the way the butt looks and the way the hips move. Even the color of the clothing is important, because the right colors can help a girls eyes and hair appear more vibrant and her skin darker/lighter.
Clothes are a big factor of attractiveness. You can dress up a perfect 10 in ill-fitting and ugly clothes and she'll look ugly, and you can dress up an otherwise plain girl in well-fit and smart clothes and she'll look gorgeous.
Also, just to avoid confusion, I am a man.
Yes, everything you say is true. But if someone isn't into it, no amount of sprucing a turd will make it appear attractive to you. Like I said, you can't make someone think you are attractive. You either are or you aren't. This doesn't mean a person can't dress better to accentuate what they have that others will like more. But again, if you dress that way because you want to appear more attractive, then you're looking to be admired. At that point, you cannot be upset when someone looks. You put time and effort into it.
No, you're not right and that's not what I said.
[–]outwrangle 23 points24 points25 points 8 months ago
She's not putting on a show. Her breasts are fully covered and she's not trying to get his attention. She's just dressed up and in public, and you think that this somehow gives horny men the right to eye her up like a piece of meat.
It's okay to look. It's not okay to burn holes through her chest with your unwavering gaze. What the fuck is she supposed to do? Wear a burlap sac? Hide?
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 months ago*
For the last bloody time. I at no point said Emma was putting it on show at any time let alone in the aforementioned pictures.
Admiration is not the same 'eyeing up a piece of meat'.
I was talking about very select cases of women wearing revealing clothing and acting as if a man is the devil himself for looking.
I hope you're the last vexatious person to get the wrong end of this stick.
EDIT: You should know that I respect women, fight for equality and Emma Watson happens to be my favourite person.
[–]suprisename 13 points14 points15 points 8 months ago
You should know that I respect women
nope.jpg
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] -1 points0 points1 point 8 months ago*
You do not know me. It's frankly insulting that you should assume to know my stance on an entire gender based off of your misunderstanding of my point that someone should not be so disgustingly self centred as to slap a man for glancing at someone if they put a part of their body on show though revealing clothing.
If you now understand what I meant and still disagree, take your proto-feminism back to the 20th century and stay there.
slap a man for glancing at someone if they put a part of their body on show though revealing clothing.
Nice straw-men bra. Whatever makes you feel like you aren't doing anything wrong.
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
You are pathetic.
[–]suprisename -1 points0 points1 point 8 months ago
hahha can't come up with an argument?
Woman being in public = woman being in public. Woman being in public + musical number= woman putting on a show. Woman wearing attractive clothing = woman wearing attractive clothing. Woman wearing overly revealing clothing to attract attention= woman putting on a show.
Excessive over statement outwrangle.
[–]ElToroFuerte 9 points10 points11 points 8 months ago
Who the fuck linked you to /r/SRS? The comment in no way said she was putting it on show. The comment clearly stated that women who wear revealing clothing shouldn't be upset when men, who are attracted to what they are revealing, end up looking at it. Hence the relevant link.
Men like boobs and if a woman is revealing them with a low cut top then don't be surprised if you catch a man looking at them boobies. If a man wears tight pants revealing his awesome butt then don't be upset when he catches them women ogling said booty.
This comment wasn't saying Emma Watson was doing any such thing. It was just defending Daniel Radcliffe in a way. While the photos are taken well out of context, the image they make together shows that women have boobs and men will look at them; this does not make that man a douche.
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] 4 points5 points6 points 8 months ago
Thank you very much for you rare support on this issue.
[–]ElToroFuerte 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago*
It's necessary because there wasn't anything said wrong. I would rescue you any day.
Edit: Until you do say something wrong. Then I'll say something mean. You wrong-saying-wrongywrongwrong.
Also, since I defended you I get the hose again, too.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 8 months ago
A quick heads up, you've been linked to by r/SRS, a group of redditors who search reddit for posts they deem offensive, and then direct hostile traffic to that post. Not affiliated r/SRS, nor any groups or causes.
[–]McCoy625 -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 months ago
Hermoine <3
[–]Seang96 4 points5 points6 points 8 months ago
Why did you get downvoted for this? Who doesn't love Hermione?
[–]yurtyybomb 14 points15 points16 points 8 months ago
It's spelled "Hermoine" in the original comment, which is probably why it was downvoted.
[–]Seang96 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
Oh! How... Didn't I notice that? Thanks for pointing that out!
[–]omnomtom 2 points3 points4 points 8 months ago
I didn't notice either. It's amazing the ability of the human brain to subconsciously fix typos and errors without our noticing.
[–]ElToroFuerte 2 points3 points4 points 8 months ago
And yet grammar nazis still exist to correct your misspellings...
[–]McCoy625 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
apparently were all grammar experts on Reddit. if people would care less about grammar and just read and respect comments we wouldn't have this problem. but I mean hey what do I know I'm only an 18 year old college student, but on here everyone thinks your some 12 year old.....go ahead down vote me. it really doesn't matter.....
For cereal. A while back there was a point dispute over a misspelling. Now people are downvoting because you switched your vowels. Just upvote for Hermione and move on.
[–]Hot_Soup -11 points-10 points-9 points 8 months ago
What's there to even look at?
[–]Commercialtalk 6 points7 points8 points 8 months ago
How about the fact that Emma Watson is stunningly beautiful?
[–][deleted] 8 months ago
[deleted]
She was underage for all photos but the last one. So yes, she was a "little girl." This doesn't detract from the fact that she is a very beautiful woman. She's 21 now. The majority of Harry Potter fans on Reddit are within that age range, there's no pedophilia about this.
[–]Commercialtalk 2 points3 points4 points 8 months ago
wat
[–]Hot_Soup -14 points-13 points-12 points 8 months ago
her tits are stunningly small
Oh, and she's not stunningly beautiful, she's a 7
[–]Commercialtalk 9 points10 points11 points 8 months ago
I bet you have a small dick.
[–]Hot_Soup -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 months ago
Your logic is impeccable
[–]thenotoriousjwb 1 point2 points3 points 8 months ago
So you're saying he's right?
[–]Hot_Soup -2 points-1 points0 points 8 months ago
your reading comprehension is impeccable.
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] 5 points6 points7 points 8 months ago
As a member of /r/emmawatson, I disagree
[–]brennanww -1 points0 points1 point 8 months ago
it's not like she's got that much to show off
[–]cenedrawood -2 points-1 points0 points 8 months ago
It's not like she has much to look at...
[–]ignotus__[Order of Merlin - First Class] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 months ago
Like any guy here wouldn't be doing the same thing
[–]rotzooipull my wand, dude -2 points-1 points0 points 8 months ago
SRS is going to go batshit after seeing some the replies in this thread
NB: LOL
[–]ritualirrigation -41 points-40 points-39 points 8 months ago
except that he's gay...
[–]Seang96 16 points17 points18 points 8 months ago
He is not gay, it's a rumor. Until the he openly states that he's gay it's idiotic to believe otherwise, especially since he has stated that he's straight. Source.
[–]ritualirrigation -11 points-10 points-9 points 8 months ago
Well 'idiotic' isn't the right word. Suppose he is gay, it would be understandable for him to want to keep it private, also in terms of his career.
[–]rob7030[Manager of Mischief] 13 points14 points15 points 8 months ago
Nope, I find it pretty idiotic to call someone gay when they have publicly affirmed their straightness.
[–]ritualirrigation -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 months ago
Well then that says more about you than it does about me, so whatever.
[–]IAmALobster[Weasley Garden Gnome] 0 points1 point2 points 8 months ago
No, rob7030 is right. It's idiotic.
[–]drock66 5 points6 points7 points 8 months ago
idk worked out pretty good for NEIL PATRICK HARRIS.
[–]Seang96 3 points4 points5 points 8 months ago
I suppose, but he has stated that he's straight, and did address the potential impact on his career if he was gay.
[–]tandembike 5 points6 points7 points 8 months ago
I've been looking for a source to confirm this... can you please post one?
[–]Yalemannec 7 points8 points9 points 8 months ago
Could of sworn he has a girlfriend.
[–]icefall5 5 points6 points7 points 8 months ago
Could have sworn he has a girlfriend.
I tried to think of a witty way to point out your grammar error, but I couldn't.
[–]jigby61 -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 months ago
He says he's not but I'm not so sure...
all it takes is a username and password
create account
is it really that easy? only one way to find out...
already have an account and just want to login?
login
[–]AngryProle 25 points26 points27 points ago
[–]chimpwizard[Corazón de León] 20 points21 points22 points ago
[–]battleship61Remus Lupin 12 points13 points14 points ago
[–]StalinsLastStand 25 points26 points27 points ago
[–]brodyqc 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ElToroFuerte 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Cameroon62 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]jigby61 23 points24 points25 points ago
[–]jdwag101 33 points34 points35 points ago
[–]90kandi 58 points59 points60 points ago
[–]crayonbox 76 points77 points78 points ago
[–]Sunfire91 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Emphursis 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] 14 points15 points16 points ago*
[–]Commercialtalk 36 points37 points38 points ago
[–]crayonbox 55 points56 points57 points ago
[–]Commercialtalk 16 points17 points18 points ago
[–]crayonbox 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]Friendlyvoices 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Be_AreRaving-claw 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Commercialtalk -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]gogog0 -4 points-3 points-2 points ago
[–]Supertrinko 10 points11 points12 points ago*
[–]affluenza 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Supertrinko 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]qmriis -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Friendlyvoices -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Supertrinko 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Friendlyvoices 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Supertrinko 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Friendlyvoices 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Supertrinko -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]Friendlyvoices 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Supertrinko -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]outwrangle 20 points21 points22 points ago
[–]Friendlyvoices -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]ElToroFuerte 9 points10 points11 points ago
[–]MetalKeirSolid[Half-Blood Prince] 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]ElToroFuerte 0 points1 point2 points ago*
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]McCoy625 -3 points-2 points-1 points ago
[–]Seang96 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]yurtyybomb 14 points15 points16 points ago
[–]Seang96 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]omnomtom 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]ElToroFuerte 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]McCoy625 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]ElToroFuerte 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]brennanww -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]cenedrawood -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]ignotus__[Order of Merlin - First Class] -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]rotzooipull my wand, dude -2 points-1 points0 points ago