Also, prochoice people aren't trying to make abortions mandatory, they're trying to preserve womens right to choose, so prolife people are antichoice.

Who said anything about mandatory abortions? I know the pro-choice argument; i'm just saying that pro-life people aren't arguing against a woman's right to choose but for the child's right to life. There is no clear definition of when a person's life begins, and, as abortions can still be legally performed after the foetus has already begun to develop a heart and a neural system (and could possibly feel pain), they could honestly consider it murder.

The pro-lifer isn't trying to deny a woman a choice with her body but protect the child they consider to be alive because it is unable to protect itself. The issue is of when a person is a person and whether that person has a right to not have their life ended.

Because someone may believe that a foetus has already begun its life as a human, they would consider aborting the pregnancy of a living child murder, violating that unborn person's right to life. One can try to distract the issue by labeling these people 'anti-choice' or 'misogynist', but it is still petty. It's similar to labeling someone against euthanasia of incompetent persons 'anti-family'.

I will also admit that i do not know how silk is harvested.