this post was submitted on
920 points (57% like it)
3,398 up votes 2,478 down votes

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 431

[–]kbb5508 122 points123 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's not that Satan is more powerful than God, God's just a dick.

[–]Ramyth 75 points76 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Seriously. All that shit up there saying "judge not, lest ye be judged" is funny because ive never killed anyone. Your move, god.

[–]GregLoire 16 points17 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But let he who is without sin cast the first stone, and by definition God is without sin because he's the one who decides what exactly sinning is -- so that's why he's been chucking stones at everyone since the dawn of time.

Loophole-exploiting bastard.

[–]buckie33 0 points1 point ago

Thats easy, just get a baby to cast the first stone. But you made a good point, in the old testement, God even fuked up Moses because he kicked a stone. ಠ_ಠ

[–]maddawg579 16 points17 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

As far as I'm concerned, God is 2 million times more evil than anyone who hasn't murdered a human being.

[–]private_ruffles 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Actually, I would say that he is infinitely more evil than any human even if he never directly killed anyone, as long as hell is real.

Look at it like this: If you kill someone, its game over. Black screen. Nothing. Your score=1

For god though, he has the ability to send someone to hell to be tortured for the rest of eternity. Even if the only person to be sent to hell was someone like Hitler, at some point the punishment is still too great for the crime. His score=∞

In conclusion, the only thing that could ever truly deserve hell is God himself.

[–]Ramyth 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I cant help but think at some point you would get used to hell. In which case you get a badass fiery lair to spend eternity in.

[–]Uberche 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I can't help but think that the devil wouldn't be punishing people who were like him. I bet Hell is full of drugs, parties and perfect 10 models with very loose morals.

Asking God what it's like in Hell is like asking a Christian what Atheists are like, they claim we are evil, intollerant and out to eat babies, but really we just want to live our lives freely, smoke/drink what we want and babies taste really damn good so don't be so bloody judgemental!

[–]scottyrobotty 0 points1 point ago

God has the power to stop death itself. But hey, why bother? He must be too busy loving us to fix that little glitch.

[–]Irongrip 0 points1 point ago

The whole concept of eternal damnation is so artificial and designed to scare feeble minds into behaving properly it's not even funny. Why would you care about pain if you don't have a body to be hurt anymore?

[–]SubliminalBlowJob 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

buuuuuuut guyssss can't you see? he's letting us kill each other! behold the blowjob glory of god. (read in cartmans voice).

[–]Heroshade 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Aye. The Bible never said anything about Satan torturing me for all eternity, just that god was going to send me to hell to burn with him.

[–]kdawghomie 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thank you. This pic isn't very accurate at all. Christians believe God allows a lot of people to go to Hell. Just as dumb, but a very important clarification... they absolutely do not believe the Devil is smarter or more powerful than God

[–]sailorh 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, I agree the way it is phrased is not going to be a helpful argument against believers. But the idea that a single conversation by Satan has successfully lead to the damnation of billions of souls makes for a good point that God's plan doesn't appear to be a very successful one. (If you are measuring success in a measure of preventing suffering.)

[–]Maos0 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

God and Satan are best buds, collaborating on all the ways to mess with Christians.

[–]very_bad_advice 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A really compelling argument though is on the true objective of an Uber-God. The word "dick" implies that God allows human suffering on this world, as well as a pre-supposed afterlife because the ultimate objective of God is to reduce or prevent human suffering. But we can not know the true nature of this, except via a several human translation ("chinese whispers") of some dude from the desert which claims to speak on God's behalf. What if the entire purpose of human existance is not for humanity to suffer less, but to actually be doing what's it doing right now? Which is making a damn lot of mistakes and learning from it like a gigantic Turing machine?

[–]Accipiter1138 31 points32 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And this is what retconning does to storylines.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I've heard the Book of Mormon attempts to fix a lot of these plot holes.

[–]HerrBongwasser 19 points20 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

yeah, but you need Origin to take it into multiplayer. :(

[–]thebballer25 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

dum dum dum dum dum dummmmm

[–]Oltex 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Partially, mormonism postulates that we are all gods offspring and also that there is no original sin (only the sin which we inevitably take part of, which renders us still in need of saving since no "unclean" entity can enter god's presence). But in reality Mormonism creates more holes than it fixes.

[–]YakMan2 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Time to do a reboot. Deity Comics, New 52.

[–]VikingTy 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Are we talking about pre-crisis or post-crisis God?

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Neither of said spirits are real, but I'd much rather have a beer with Good Old Satan.

[–]sailorh 20 points21 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well from what the bible describes of him, he would probably be less likely to kill you afterward.

[–]ForkMeVeryMuch 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And with much less bloodthirsty gore and glee in it.

[–]alchemist5 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yea, Satan doesn't seem like the kind of guy who'd watch Glee. Seems like more of a Grey's Anatomy guy, to me.

[–]what_thedouche 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

according to the bible, Satan just hates God and those who follow him... so if you chill with Satan and fuck God up the ass you're all set.

[–]Dogleg64 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

bar-b-que, dont forget the bar-b-que

[–]spook327 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Careful; that's the same attitude that got GWB elected!

[–]cbear3000 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

One opinion could be that Satan has an easier job than God. It is easier to get people to do what the hell they want, than it is to get people to follow rules for perhaps the benefit of one or more people.

[–]lhbtubajon 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Nah, still stupid, because who was that determined what people want to do in the first place. Right. God.

[–]MayorEmanuel 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Satan hardly even exists in the Old Testament, to my knowlage only sporting in the Book of Job and can only function within G-d's will. Christians made him into the ruler of the underworld, I would go so far as to argue that having two opposing deities is not really monotheistic.

[–]Dogleg64 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

opposing deities/monotheistic another hole in the cosmic jew theory, i like that

[–]MayorEmanuel 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Could you clarify what you mean by "cosmic Jew theory"?

[–]Dogleg64 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–][deleted] 135 points136 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thankfully, the whole thing is moot here since neither God nor Satan are real.

[–]dustinechos 109 points110 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Although factually correct, this statement brings nothing to the conversation. I want you to think about what you've done.

[–]Thorbinator 26 points27 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Technically correct, the best kind of correct.

[–]philin 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I personally believe that empirically correct is better.

[–]PresumablyCorrect 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I believe being presumably correct is better.

[–]Grimjestor 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I prefer anecdotally correct. During the next song, Deacon James will be passing around the collection plate. Give generously, and maybe we'll pass a good word along for you.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So God gave Satan free will.

And then God gave man free will.

Free will has caused a lot of pain and suffering in the world, but would you give up free will?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'll trade free will for infinite and eternal joy, satisfaction, and contentment.

I'm sure an omniscient and omnipotent god could provide that.

[–]vanillaafro 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

this actually makes you think of an interesting thought experiment...if you could live in a fake world with all pleasure and no pain would you do it? Most people i think would answer no, but why would an atheist answer no?

[–]cmeza83 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You said fake world. Implying that what you experience isn't real (kind of like being in the Matrix). Also, if all you do is experience pleasure, and never pain or suffering, then you will not appreciate or fully experience pleasure. Such a world is not as fun as it sounds

-Your fellow atheist

[–]catnap1080 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Pain can be and is used in a variety of ways. Physical, emotional, spiritual, ... you get the point. And I would like to believe that atheist still understand that being "hurt" is an important part of becoming who you are. Without pain you cannot fully experience and appreciate the pleasure aspect of life. Not only that, but on a personal note, in my opinion, pain is what makes life real. It's what drives us and motivates us to accomplish the things we've always wanted.

If you think about it, pain is basically universal (I mean worldly, but assuming other life exists outside our own world, wouldn't they feel pain too?) motivation. You want to do something, because the "pain" (used vaguely) of not doing so would make you feel something other than happiness.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Without pain you cannot fully experience and appreciate the pleasure aspect of life.

I disagree. But, hey, it turns out that your proposition should be testable. Let's find some people who have experienced excruciating pain. Let's find some people who haven't. Let's then subject them to similar pains and see what happens.

[–]dustinechos 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't see how this comment is relevant to the current line of conversation. But I'll bite.

Imagine a world in which women released an tranquilizing mist from their vagina when a man tried to rape them. You'd have the exact same amount of free will, the exact same ability for God to test mankind, but no rape. I would call the god that makes this universe more benevolent. This disproves that god is pure good.

[–]5py 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There's no such thing as free will.

[–]redorkulated 24 points25 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, but it's still fun to speculate - it's like Superman versus Batman.

[–]xhhux 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

well obviously superman would win.

[–]cduff77 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ever since Mr. Wayne has joined the Justice League he has carried kryptonite in his utility belt for such an occasion. Also, as seen in the Contingency Plan story line in the Justice League cartoon (which I'm sure is based off of comics) he also has a plan to take down every one else.

[–]Gimme_Some_Sunshine 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Trolls feeding trolls here, but Batman would beat every superhero (within his universe). DC stated that he has a countermeasure to stop any superhero who goes rogue, with ample preparation time.

[–]BPhair 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, what about heroes that would be able to deny him such time? Flash could go crazy and kill everyone before Batman's next heart-beat.

[–]ZeroNihilist 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Or Superman could go and throw the Earth into the sun in a minute or so. Hell, if that Superman movie that never happened was canon Superman could just turn back time until Batman hadn't been born, and then kill his whole family.

[–]mrfenegri 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]Reeses95 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Mormons are Christians, and they don't believe in original sin.

[–]alcoholiccactus 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Technically correct... best kind... etc.

[–]wonkifier 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But it's not moot.

People believe they exist. And they act on their beliefs. I think it totally makes sense to see where those beliefs go, and point the funny stuff out. Since there's a chance we'll end up causing someone to start down that long deconversion process.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I saw a thread recently that pointed out that there isn't actually much info on Satan in the bible, and it's not clear that he's actually an agent who works against god's will from actual biblical content, can anyone clarify?

[–]paolog 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What's more, comparison operators are not defined on non-real operands.

goes back to /r/math

[–]saucemoney 0 points1 point ago

M00t is a faggot.

[–]xiipaoc 37 points38 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

By the way, please don't quote Genesis here -- no character called Satan was involved; it was a snake. It's only the New Testament that interprets that snake as Satan, because it would fit their narrative.

[–]Fappenstance[S] 44 points45 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was going to stay silent on this post, but I had to log in to respond to this. This post is about what many Christians believe. I was raised in a baptist church and I have been in more fundamentalist churches than anyone I know because of the specifics of my upbringing. Universally and without exception, these churches interpreted the serpent to be Satan in animal form. That's not to say that all denominations believe this way, but from my considerable experience with fundamentalists this is what I've learned.

Without taking into consideration what Christians actually believe, there's no point in arguing over any scriptural text. How they use the scriptures is of utmost importance. To say that there is no character directly named "Satan" misses the point, because that's like saying there's no "trinity" or "rapture" in the bible simply because those words are not found. The concept and context are there, and the interpretation is what is troublesome.

Many Christians who take the bible literally believe that the serpent was Satan. It's similar to the Christophanies, which are characters in the old testament that many Bible scholars believe to be incarnations of Jesus before he came as Messiah in the New Testament.

[–]RedRiotRoses 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To my knowledge, the snake was actually the angel Samael, who tempted Lilith away from her husband Adam, before taking Lilith as his wife, then Eve was created only for the angel-snake Samael to pop up again and tempt Eve. No Satan involvement.

[–]BringBack3South 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

TIL about Lilith. Wiki.

[–]cduff77 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yea, wth, thats super interesting that it is just left out now

[–]TypicalHaikuResponse 1 point2 points ago

TIL There are people who don't get their religious information from Supernatural, Manga, or American comics

[–]Vagar 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not gonna lie, I'm getting a print of that painting.

[–]i_am_still_alive 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's not quite true. Jewish tradition from before Christ commonly equated the Serpent with Satan (see, for example, Wisdom 2:24), and "crush your head" in Genesis 3:15 was commonly believed to refer to the Messiah's victory.

[–]joker559 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes, there's no reason to think the snake was the devil it never said he was, it was just a snake, which makes it even funnier. Now there is a perfectly good reason to think that snakes are more powerful than god.

[–]Amunium 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Does this really make a difference to the argument, though? If the snake was just a normal (although talking) snake, then it follows that snakes are much more powerful or intelligent than god. Hardly an improvement from the Christian POV.

[–]Neurogasm 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This should be on a blog that nobody reads.

[–]Dogleg64 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

i cant read

[–]Miss_Bee 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My mom said that God can actually save you and destroy all of hell, but he's sending you there because he loves you. Also, that you choose to go there, whether you believe or not.

[–]MorningHaze 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sorry to say this kid, but your mom's a dingbat.

[–]Miss_Bee 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Everyone knows that already. Also, I'm glad I'm not a kid. Then I would still be living with her. Poor younger, brainwashed siblings :(

[–]Dogleg64 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

dingbat! (technical term)

[–]Ozymandias12 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No Colonel Sanders, you're wrong. Momma's right

[–]Almustafa 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ok, let's clear up a few things: according to the presbyterian dogma I grew up with, Hell isn't fire and brimstone, that's an analogy, hell is separation from God (for that matter, Heaven isn't harps, robes and singing, it's life in the presence of God, C.S. Lewis went so far as to say that Christians are living in heaven (i.e. the kingdom of god) on earth, and Atheists are living in hell on earth). So the doctrine goes, by ignoring God you chose to go there, he doesn't send you anywhere, that's the first judgment, based on faith, not to be confused with the second judgment, based on your deeds in the Apocalypse, where God forgives and redeems the righteous and punishes the evildoers (where you draw the line is sometime iffy, I figure God can forgive anyone if they will ask for it and admit they were wrong, so there will be few people in hell after the second judgment).

[–]hollowmen 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't know if Satan would be more powerful than God. I think it's just a commentary on how much easier it is to corrupt and destroy something than it is to create.

[–]makesgreatsandwiches 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's not that your logic is wrong, it's just you didn't educate yourself enough on the topic first.

Christians don't believe Satan is more powerful than God. "Original sin" didn't even originate from Satan. Original sin was God's punishment to Adam and Eve for disobeying Him in Eden. Simply put, original sin is a disconnect from God. The "original" or "first" sin against God from man. Adam and Eve were no longer in God's grace, and God punished them further by saying all of their descendants would automatically be born into this state too. Jesus died to erase this punishment so we could be baptized into God's family and "wash away" Adam and Eve's wrongdoing that has been passed down to us.

...so original sin really has nothing to do with Satan at all.

[–]YakMan2 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To play devil's advocate, or god's advocate as it were, when you are an infinite being a thousand years is the same as a blink of the eye.

Can't defend the specifics of the plan though. That is just old school animal/human sacrifice bullshit.

[–]jedifrog 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Christians also believe in talking snakes and men living in the sky.

[–]i_am_still_alive 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Or, Satan's existence and actions are an unpleasant but necessary result of God's desire that his creations have free will. Sort of like how we keep alcohol legal, even though some people use it to become dysfunctional wrecks. (This would be the conventional Christian view, as I understand it.)

[–]Colawaii 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

All hail Satan my dark lord and master.

[–]deadmyth 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

thank satan you didn't use a legion of fonts to make this graphic.

[–]Revelatus 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yet both of them are infinitely less powerful than a piece of dust, which actually exists.

[–]aceintx 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

this was funny, believe what you will. that is my motto

[–]dlg1058 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm always amazed by how I think I've read everything there is in the whole r/atheism debate canon and yet there are always new perspectives to show me how silly the whole thing really is. Kudos :)

[–]bruiserman 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

and then all the theists come pouring in.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]ZeMagnumForce 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Can I ask what fonts you used? I really like the choices here!

[–]Sarutahiko 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

One could argue that it's not that he's more powerful, it's just that it's easier to break something than make it.

For instance, you could spend a year building the coolest playing card house ever made and all it takes is a flick of a finger to destroy it.

When Yahweh gave humans free will he made his creation fragile for the sake of their benefit and Satan took advantage of that.

[–]taskrokone 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

upvote for awesomely designed graphic illustration of bullshit

[–]360walkaway 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So Satan is like Luke and Bo Duke, and God is Boss Hogg?

Reference for those who don't know who I'm talking about.

[–]sploogeannomatron 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If God did know and still does know all that would and ever will happen, then this whole thing is just one big game.

[–]rottenseed 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Pretend that heaven and hell did exist, ran by the entities god and satan respectively. Why would the place that that guy ran be better than the place that this guy ran?

[–]CaptainMorgen 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Maybe human beings are just dumb.

[–]Kralizec555 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Haha I want to show this graphic off to people who proselytize door to door.

[–]Bananavice 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't think Christians would have a problem with Satan being more intelligent than God. Intelligence is not something that is highly valued in most religions, and is often looked down upon because it makes you question things. The snake (Satan?) is sly and clever and tricks people. While good traits for a christian are kindness and loyalty.

[–]SA0S1N 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

GOD = SATAN NOT REAL

[–]kILLahILL 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

nice design

[–]lackofprogress 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, its that lucky fraction part that caused me to loose my religion as a child. When I was old enough to realize how utterly ridiculous it was that God only chooses to save the people who have heard of him I had had it. When I asked members of the church and my pastor they all said that's what evangelism is for. Now according to the 2nd book of Acts god granted his message to representatives from ALL peoples and cultures who just happened to be present when Peter is giving witness to them. That means god put the responsibility of saving all of humanities souls on a single group of people who happened to be in Jerusalem. Really?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"Simple conversation"?

[–]liapocalypse 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What about the idea that God created Satan as a tempter? Satan is on God's side, then, and God is both kind of a dick and smart and powerful.

[–]jgoosdh 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

hmm... I think its interesting that most of the opinions of the God presented in the bible here tend to the "he's an asshole" end of the spectrum. This seems to be without fail based on an underlying assumption that if such a God exists, then his number one priority should be care of humanity.

Funny that this isn't what the bible espouses. If you hypothetically accept the premise of a creator God (which you must do in order to call him an arse), then why assume the guy who created everything in the universe has human comfort as his top priority?

[–]EnthusedCarrot 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

First thing I need to say is this: I am not defending christians. Think of this as a lesson to learn how the more educated theologians would argue in response to this.

Using text in the Bible to generalize how all christian's belief systems work isn't always enough. This only works for people that believe scripture is the direct word of God. Many other moderate views use other reasons to explain the word of scripture. Also, could you be more specific with your fourth source?

[–]Sarah415 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'd say a rebuttal point you're likely to get on this is that humans can only enter heaven by attaining a state of purity as laid out in the bible, therefore it's humans who are at fault for not living as god wants them to, not gods fault that people don't believe and follow. It's a pretty meagre response, especially considering many Christians see desires they think are evil as temptations of the devil (meaning he still has more power), but people will grasp at anything to keep their convictions valid. Nobody wants to have their world turned upside down, particularly if they think the other side of the world is evil. :)

[–]harrypl0tter 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

pfft....I took care of satan at hogwarts

[–]--shaun-- 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I like the concept, but the reason that Satan is more 'successful' than God is that it is easier to be bad than good. Satan is an embodiment of temptation and destructive desire which is easier to give in to than it is to strive for more constructive ideals.

Satan is selling a far more desirable product. God never had a chance.

[–]bigkuhr 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No, way.. can't you see through it all? It's a big conspiracy, yo! Like.. Check this out.. okay.. like.. what if.. god and Satan worked together to keep all the douche bags out. Like, it says in the bible, those two were fuckin close. Like, best bro's and shit. Then, all of the sudden Satan becomes this dick of an angel and changes the game.. naw man.. I'm thinkin those two kept throwin some bomb ass parties and were tired of every asshole on the golden block comin in and crashin their shit. So they came up with this story and made their bro-pad exclusive.

[–]Chances 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I could see someone trying to explain this to someone, and it going okay

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is the way my jehovas witness broke it down to me. God is letting the devil rule over the world. Iits up to us to find the way and show others the way. When armageddon is over the dead will rise and there will be a sort of heaven on earth for a thousand years. During this time the devil will be locked up. After that the devil will be cast into a river of fire ( not literally i think ) along with all the non believers. Then its all heaven from there on after.

[–]SherImOnlyIrish 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"You see religion has actually convinced people... there is an invisible man, living in the sky!"

[–]MikeDSNY 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But there is no god or satan, so I don't even know what you're talking about! :)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Please don't use wikipedia as a source.

Feel free to use what wikipedia uses as a source as a source, though.

[–]FuriousJ 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The more I think about it, the more I think that the "Lucky Fraction" is THE integral part of religion. It's not enough to know that you're going to heaven, you need to know that everyone else is going to hell. You need to know that you are special and different then everyone else, that you know whats up, and everyone else is grossly misguided. Everyone wants to believe that, it's just religious people actually do.

[–]last1here 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm an atheist. That means I don't believe in an afterlife. That means no God and no Satan.

[–]Chilapox 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it's not that God's weak, he just chooses to be losing because it's a part of his master plan or some shit. y'all are just too heathen to understand duh.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There is quite a few inaccurate things in this. number one, it never states that it took thousands of years to devise a plan. He has it all set up in the beginning. Satan is always here, he is the temptation, without satan, there would be absolutely no purpose in this life. That is the test we are in. But ya, you think you wikipedia resources are going to convince people who go to church for hours every week... your wrong.

[–]rygrove 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You are a actually narrating a western, fundamentalist view of the fall and atonement, which is a relatively new understanding of the whole equation. If you study Eastern Christianity and even Western Christianity up until Aquinas and scholasticism in the twelfth century you do not have this ultra clear (and fundamentally inaccurate) picture of sin and atonement that spells everything out. The disconnect comes in the pursuit. You are arguing against God with the mindset that everything is supposed to make logical sense, when Christians (prior to Aquinas) were well aware of the fact that most of scripture contradicts our human understanding of logic, that's the point. Scripture (Israel->Christ) is not concerned with history as an end, or absolute, in the same way we are (hell, modern history was born after the formation of the canon!), it is concerned with history only as a means for theological reflection. This all comes to mean that when you take a random verse out of the Bible and throw it into a narrative for the sake of building a historical account, which is what you have done, it completely disregards the verses purpose and the authors' intent (both original and redacted).

I only mean to articulate another side.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

if your gonna pick on someone, at least get the story right. Jesus=god as man, they aren't separate beings.

other than that, not bad.

[–]Zombie_Death_Vortex 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The usual cop out I hear for stuff like this is that god works in mysterious ways. I sure do hate that argument.

[–]bruiserman 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If it comes down to a final battle , Satan will definitely have the numbers on his side. Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

[–]larynx1982 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

why satan is more powerful than god.

Why imaginary character 1 is more powerful than imaginary character 2.

FTFY

But nice infographic nevertheless.

[–]oboedude 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's easy to twist words when you use only bits and pieces scattered throughout the bible...

[–]Caligineus 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Eloquently done, really appreciate the design and subtlety. You make interesting, concise points - this is the kind of content r/atheism needs more of.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But wait, God intentionally handicapped himself by allowing man free will.

Since the whole situation presented in Christianity revolves around diametric choice between good and evil, how a decision between two holistically "unequal" options pose any difficulty?

Quick round of devil's advocate; let's say the devil doesn't exist. Or he does, but everyone thinks he's lame. Would anyone really need to struggle to decide be a good person? If God was proved to be greater than Satan - either by some definitive affirmation of the indisputable goodness of mankind or direct proof of God and Satan's existence - only a babbling fool would challenge the will of so powerful a being.

So God might not be dicking us around by allowing evil to seem just as appealing as good; he could just be a scientist trying not to bias his results.

[–]armedburrito 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Logic'd.

[–]Raptor-Llama 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

lucky fraction

What on Earth does luck have anything to do with it?

[–]ElGuano 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Dear God: Go back in time, and tell yourself not to put the tree of knowledge in the garden of eden. Problem solved. Why is this so hard for you?

[–]ReverseLabotomy 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Satan != snake

[–]TheyCallMeNaterTater 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Dammit, this is why they think we worship Satan. To any Christian, /atheism troll reading this, we do not worship Satan, or any deity. That is all.

[–]Monkeybirds 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Whenever i think I'm right i put myself into the other sides shoes and try to disprove myself. The intelligent christian defense to this is that God is more powerful because he is everywhere and everything, even the "devil". He is not an old man sitting on a cloud he is a being that views time and space as we view a single particle and knows dimensions far beyond what we can comprehend. The whole thing is designed to be a test to see, with a choice between good and evil, how "free will" will react. I could go on but I'm sure you get my point. I respectfully say that your chart is not going to win anybody over to your side. It is about as futile to your cause as handing a bible to you would be for theirs. And the central part in an atheists beliefs should be to eliminate futile actions. Your argument needs to be refined. I personally believe that there's too much space for error to rule out any possible idea on why and who we are. But i can also say that there's a chance that there's not enough time and resources left to figure out who is right. But hey, what the fuck do i know, I'm only a janitor.

[–]denisbider 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A belief in literal hell seems to be a fundamentalist Christian thing more so than something shared by all Christians. The educated Christians I knew in Europe didn't seem to believe in hell literally, but took it more so as a metaphor. They recognized the absurdity of Biblical claims, so they interpreted them as something more sensible. Example:

  • There isn't an actual devil, it's a metaphor for the evil parts of yourself.

  • There isn't an actual hell, it's a mental state you end up in if you give in to evil.

  • God wants you to stay away from evil, and come to "him". But free will is such an important principle that he can't force you to not end up in a bad mental state. You have to make your own decision.

Such Christians take everything as a metaphor. That makes it harder to debate religion with them, because what they believe is so entirely fluid and adaptable. But as far as it works, it's actually a good thing; when they encounter evidence, they're often willing to adapt their faith instead of denying the evidence.

Unfortunately, it still tends to not go as far as tolerating homosexual marriage. :-/ In this case, they tend to be ignorant of the evidence.

[–]jtbeith 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

upvote for an original point made.

[–]foolery 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You can't just lead in with "Obviously, God does not exist" when trying to free a religious person. Pointing out logical inconsistencies in what they believe needs to be done because otherwise, they do not see them.

They're not stupid, but if you get jerked into the circular logic of Christianity, someone is going to have to jerk you out of it.

This particular argument would plant the seed of doubt in the mind of a person that believes in God out of fear of God's power, the same way that the Good Guy Lucifer posts work well to raise doubts about fear of the Devil's malice. The important thing here is doubt. If they can doubt anything, they can doubt everything--a strategy that takes a page out of Lucifer's playbook, actually.

[–]wroth 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I can imagine the christian response to this being something along the lines of "It's easier to destroy a work of art than it is to create one".

[–]kjmsb2 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To be fair, though, the bible doesn't say that Satan was in the garden. According to the bible it was just a random talking snake that happened by.

[–]roshi94 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I swear in genesis is just says serpent, not devil.

[–]honeybunny123 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Although this made me laugh my ass off, I can see now why Christian Redditors (and other Christians for that matter) think we worship the devil..... Oh well, I'm laughing!

[–]insanityarise 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I've actually just read the beginning of genesis 3 as the pic sparked my interest, it's pretty odd.

So, god made the snake, snake is craft why? Because it's a snake, of course. So snakey says “You will not certainly die, for God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” I don't know about you, but I would have agreed after getting snakey to eat some to check and make sure it didn't die, but when that didn't happen, I too would have eaten the fruit, sounds delicious.

Then God acts like a bit of a dick, tells adam he has to do some fucking work for a change and then makes eve basically adams slave and gives her the pain of childbirth.

The main thing I dont get is gods next move; he banishes them but before kicking them out, he gives them clothes made of skin?! WTF! IT MAKES NO SENSE!

Also, this: "After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life."

Why the fuck put "the tree of life" there in the first place if you can see to the end of time, god would have known this would happen, surely. Why a flaming sword? First physical weapon ever, made by God.

I know the bible as we see it today is a mashup of different stories from 3 different gods, translated a bunch of times and then heavily edited, but this narrative hardly makes any sense, also this "God" character seems like a bit of an idiot to me.

[–]TheChosenOne013 3 points4 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Here is my take on it, and keep in mind that I am NOT religious, just looking at all sides.

I think God wants people to get into heaven, but you must prove yourself first. If you want to get into top level management you can't quit school after eighth grade and start applying. You need to prove you deserve it by going to high school and college. Thusly proving you deserve it.

Just my opinion :)

EDIT: not sure what the down votes are for. It's a reasonable argument and opinion. You guys call yourselves logical and rational, as am I. Instead of down voting because I am looking at all opinions, try a counter argument.

EDIT2: still down votes. This is the primary problem I have with this subreddit. Nearly everyone laughs and jests that Christians are close minded, yet when someone points out other sides, and I am not even saying that I believe these sides, but merely pointing them out, they immediately get mocked and downvoted, making them just as close minded as the ones they make fun of! Intelligent conversation people.

[–]postguy2 18 points19 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think God wants people to get into heaven, but you must prove yourself first.

Which is silly, because he'd know before creating each of us whether we'd end up in Heaven or not, if he's both our creator and omniscient, so a test phase on Earth would be unnecessary.

[–]TheChosenOne013 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You are forgetting though that Catholics don't believe in predestination, which is kind of what you are alluding to. Also a reason why it drives me insane when Catholics say "Everything happens for a reason hurrr"

[–]postguy2 18 points19 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Catholics don't believe in predestination, which is kind of what you are alluding to.

It could be called predestination, but it is a logical problem with the "omniscient creator" that cannot be avoided. Here it is:

  • God knows all that will ever be

  • God creates each one of us

  • Therefore, God knows everything anyone will do before he creates them

So, what's the point of creating them on Earth? Why not just send their souls directly to Heaven/Hell without the unnecessary test phase?

And, further, why create the people who will end up going to Hell at all? Why not just create only people who will choose Heaven?

In years of my asking this question, nobody has ever answered it in a way that solves the problem. All I ever get in return is "Well, people have free will," which does not solve the problem. It ignores it while the problem still lingers.

[–]jstamos013 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm no expert on the subject, but I did spend 18 years pretty heavily involved with christianity before abandoning it for agnosticism. Here's what I picked up from that time in regards to this issue, cause I've thought about this too. Your three points about "God" are all correct (in regards to the concept of the Christian god.) He is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent.

So then, why is there seemingly error in the scheme of creation? Why were humans "allowed" to become imperfect in Eden and consequently ruin the earth for however many untold eons that followed?

To answer this question, we have to break things down into a "Godlike" perspective, so to speak.

  1. >Why not just send their souls directly to Heaven/Hell without the unnecessary test phase?

Well, if you're God, you don't need a test phase. You're omniscient. You already know what's going to happen. As for sending souls directly to Heaven/Hell without the life on earth bit, it's hard to say. In truth, this is a multifaceted idea and can be considered from several different angles. One is that, for God, time doesn't necessarily exist. In fact, according to christian mythology, God DOES exist outside of time. So, the concept of our lives and phases of time doesn't really apply to him. As far as God is concerned, we may very well be instantly going to heaven/hell. A second concept is that God specifically wants human beings to live on earth before ending at our destination. And this ties into both the answer you typically receive as well as your second (third?) question.

2.> Why create the people who will end up going to Hell at all? Why not just create only people who will choose Heaven?

I think the answer here is contrast. Sure, God could certainly create people that would only CHOOSE Him, and by extension, heaven, but without a comparison base, it loses value. Good only exists because Evil also exists. Without evil, there's nothing to compare good to and then who knows if good is actually good or not. So, in order for the maximum potential of good people to be seen/recognized/heard/etc., evil people must also be present. Interestingly, this brings up several questions on its own, such as, "What's the point?" and, "Why does God need a comparison base if he's omniscient?"

These each have their own answers. "What's the point" is answered simply in the concept "for the glory of God." This is both christian theology as well as the only worthwhile, "logical" conclusion. (I use the term logical here within the constraints and shackles of christian theology. Necessary for context/present discussion.) The point of all existence, pain, pleasure, punishment, reward, and all other ideas is simply for the glory of God. This is, ultimately, what I think people mean when they say >"Well, people have free will." God is glorified by human being's free will and the choice to worship him, rather than be overly complex automatons that worship him without an option. Furthermore, God is glorified not just by our worshiping Him but even more so by our worshiping with a full understanding that we are doing so and recognition by others. This, by the way, answers the question, "Why does God need a comparison base if he's omniscient?" God himself doesn't. He KNOWS what good and evil is because he's omniscient. And that's fine. But he wants humans to know the difference, worship him for it AND have other human beings recognize that. The combination of those elements provides the maximum possible potential for glory.

Finally, as a last note, on the subject of free will; this is admittedly a sketchy point in christian theology. There is no good answer. Most christians believe that humans have free will AND that God is omniscient/omnipresent - as you pointed out, clearly a combination of elements that would infer "predestination" or some other concept with roughly the same meaning. So, how can the two concepts coexist? I don't know. And nobody else does either. All the learned christians who've really thought this out as much as I've tried to do here have said, "That's just a mystery of God that can't be explained." Much the same way that God can be 100% God the Father (Jehova), 100% God the Son (Jesus), and 100% God the Spirit (Holy Ghost) and still be just 100% God. Not 300%. And not 33.3% each. Each one is 100% God and all together they are combined 100% God. This seemingly defies logic, rationality and reason, but is simply passed as a "mystery of God" that we as mere humans can't comprehend.

Hope this helped.

Tl;DR: God exists outside of time - everything He does is instantaneous if he wants it to be (from his perspective) and he does or does not for His ultimate glory.

[–]postguy2 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

One is that, for God, time doesn't necessarily exist. In fact, according to christian mythology, God DOES exist outside of time. So, the concept of our lives and phases of time doesn't really apply to him. As far as God is concerned, we may very well be instantly going to heaven/hell. A second concept is that God specifically wants human beings to live on earth before ending at our destination.

Neither of these explain how a "test" on Earth is valuable to an omniscient creator.

God could certainly create people that would only CHOOSE Him, and by extension, heaven, but without a comparison base, it loses value...Good only exists because Evil also exists.

So then the existence of evil is good, since without evil, there can be no good. So, essentially, doing evil is doing God's work, since all of it is necessary for good to exist. If everybody on Earth, today, freely chose good, then good would cease to exist, and God would not be pleased?

God is glorified by human being's free will and the choice to worship him, rather than be overly complex automatons that worship him without an option.

This is not part of the problem that an omniscient creator poses. He could create only people who freely choose to do good. The issue of automatons that worship him has nothing to do with this conversation.

clearly a combination of elements that would infer "predestination" or some other concept with roughly the same meaning. So, how can the two concepts coexist? I don't know.

They can't.

"That's just a mystery of God that can't be explained."

I have long ago dubbed this, "The Great Cop-Out."

[–]JCelsius 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

According to Christian beliefs, God is supposed to love everyone. He's supposed to be benevolent. As such, what sense would your theory make that he wants you to be happy but only if you prove yourself first. Mind you Christians don't think that proving yourself via actions is truly important, but instead it is what you believe. One could terrorize the world their entire life and on their death bed accept Jesus and guess what? Heaven. On the other hand, I could give everything I have in order to help the less fortunate and with my dying breath spread love and peace, but if I didn't submit to God I would be eternally punished. So no, even if God existed (which he doesn't) proving yourself really has nothing to do with it.

Upvote for bringing a unique view to discussion though.

[–]robocord 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Satan doesn't exist. God doesn't exist. Posts like this serve only to piss off the fundies, all the while reaffirming to them how right they are and how evil atheists are. Shouldn't the goal be to help them understand logic, rather than just to annoy them?

[–]montegyro 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I suppose two kinds are here:

  • The kind that can be talked to reasonably, and find this post humorous

  • The kind that came here to be angry.

Honestly, they'll find what they're looking for, regardless.

[–]rabbitchannel 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It does help them understand logic. The conclusion was formed by using bible quotes. Let us assume, for the moment, that a religious person who reads this reaches the same conclusion or accepts the logic for it. This would mean that the bible, taken as the word of God for many, would state that Satan is more powerful than God. However, God is supposed to be the most powerful being in the universe. So which is it? It cannot be both. If it cannot be both, then one part of the bible will be wrong. The contradiction will force the reader to realize, or at least get some sort of inkling, that the bible is not factual. From there, the person wonders what other contradictions the bible has and whether or not we can tell what is truth and what is a lie in a book that raises a lot of questions. That seed of doubt is enough and in my opinion, these sorts of arguments are very powerful.

.

On the surface, you are debating Satan's power vs God's power. The aim of this is not to prove that Satan is greater than God, but to use information that the person believes is true (the bible) and lead him or her to make conclusions that clash with belief.

[–]MisterMet 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It is not original sin that sends people to hell, it is their own decision to turn away from God.

[–]YakMan2 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

God makes the rules though. He even made hell. Why do such a thing?

[–]sailorh 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That depends on your interpretation of the New Testament, but many people interpret that Adam's sin is carried in all of us, so even before we make a choice to "turn away" from God we are sinners. If someone thinks that it is the act of turning away that condemns them then it might contradict "no one comes to the father except through me" because it implies there are people who are "sinless" (infants/children) that would not need Jesus.

[–]Fappenstance[S] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Your view, MisterMet, is not the commonly accepted theological standpoint, from my understanding. I usually hear it stated that we are born sinners (hence the universally declared "Fall of Man"), and this is why it was so important that Jesus be "born of a virgin." He could not be born of "man" and inherit the original sin.

To be clear, I was always indoctrinated to believe that we were born sinners, but we had a free ticket to heaven until around the age of 12...the "age of accountability" was how it was described to me.

[–]UnderTruth 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's a shame that the thousand-plus years of Christian theology prior to and other than Protestantism is so much less influential in the US and Europe. Seriously. I mean Orthodoxy especially, but even in the Catholic Catechism, it's made abundantly clear that because of Jesus, God's "default" is Saved, and it's only continued rejection of God in favor of making oneself their own God that puts a person to the state of Hell. :/ I hope & think the real God will forgive people for not believing in an evil God.

[–]JordanLadd 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Satan will be judged and banished into the lake of fire forever by God after the 1,000 year reign of Christ on the earth. Therefore God is more powerful than Satan.

God is the master engineer of the entire universe from star systems to subatomic particles. Therefore God is more intelligent than Satan.

[–]rocketsack 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While entertaining, your little piece of art here is missing the mark in its interpretation.

According to Christian theology, the only reason that anything happens is because God, in one way or another, wills it. Through free will human beings are allowed to be weak and fall to temptation, such as the snake in the garden. While God may not want that for his creation, he allows it to happen, and only those that are capable of abiding by his rules are allowed into heaven.

What you did there was like calling the winner of a fixed fight the better boxer.

-Disclaimer: I am agnostic, don't even start.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]0masterdebater0 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So your argument is why if Satan is smarter than Christ can he not win over Christ? Well if you and me had a long conversation about God I would still not able to win you over would I? Even if i were to state infallible truths such as the evidence that humanity is at least 100,000 years old you would still argue that the bible is correct and that the earth was created only a few thousand years ago, would you not? You see even more intelligent people can't always win over the less intelligent, so your argument is invalid. And yes I am saying I'm more intelligent than you.

[–]Borealismeme 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's so hard to shop for Christ, I mean seriously, what do you get the son of Jehovah? Now if Satan had some of those "hot now" Krispy Kreme donuts, I'm thinking Christ would have been all over that temptation.

[–]misterbrad 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Actually "hot now" Krispy Kreme donuts were physically impossible until after the resurrection. God is omnipotent ergo Jesus is omnipotent and thus both knew that there was no fucking way one could refuse one of those donuts in the middle of a desert after weeks of fasting.

The end result is that frosting wasn't invented until the 18th century. True story.

[–]Carg72 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To make up for his lack of power, God goes ahead and becomes responsible for killing about 10 million more people in his own holy book than the supposedly evil guy.

[–]thedeepestwang 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

8 million off. God killed 2,476,633 versus Satan's 10. A source, although there are plenty more

[–]Trashcanman33 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Most Christians do not believe that if you are not a follower of Christ you go to hell, quote the Bible all you want the fact is most Christians do not Believe most of the Bible to be 100% factual. Most believe if you live a Christ like life, being good to you neighbor and are a good person you will go to heaven. Seen so many post like this lately that assume that the minority of Christian beliefs somehow makes the majority believers as well.

[–]rjshatz 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think it's hard to say "this is what Christians believe!" because modern day interpretations are so convoluted that most of the time that generalization just isn't true anymore. You can't tell anyone what they believe.

[–]Lyri 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Classic misinformation here folks.

[–]Wattss 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"There's a bit more to it than that" doesn't quite get the point across. LOL

[–]ilovemagicmush 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is neat, because it's true. I am a former atheist. This went from making absolutely no sense, garbage bullshit, to "oh, I get it now. LoL".

I'll try to rephrase it for those willing listen:

Original sin = As humans, we were born into this crazy society, wars, fighting, etc. You didn't have a choice. You didn't choose to be born into your body, nor your mind, nor your thoughts. It happened by itself. We were born into hell. Why don't people stop fighting and start loving each other, helping each other? Why? It's because of this original sin. Our parents raised us, society raised us, and we are slaves to them. We act upon knowledge we've learned from them and taken for granted to be true. If we've learned "we need to kill xxx!" then that's our original sin, because it was engrained into us. Then we pass it on to our children, continuing the cycle of hell. That's how your parents sins affect you. Spreading Christianity in such a way, forcing it onto people who don't understand, is a sin as well. I'm fairly sure Jesus would not approve.

"GOD desires all men to be saved." He wants us to wake up from this hell which we are creating. He wants us to love everything and everyone. To those who don't want to wake up, you are creating your own hell. I was creating my own hell too when I was an atheist. Hell isn't literally a burning lavapit of torture. It has to do with a state of consciousness. The belief that you are separate from the universe (ie, I feel like I'm driving my body. I believe I exist somewhere behind my eyes. That my consciousness is inside this physical body. I feel like more of a visitor of the earth.) is an indication that you are in hell. It's an illusion. It's a dream. You're cultivating a dream world. God wants you to wake up.

[–]Ramennov 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Reminded me of this video.

[–]dsauce 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Idiot, at the very worst they believe humans are aligning more with a lack of God.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

wtf? you used wikipedia as a resource??

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I do not believe in christianity, but this seems like a metaphor for how man's selfish and evil nature is less prominent than his good nature.

[–]jonpotz 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Jose, is that you?

[–]Skittls 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Do you know nothing about how anything works? If you want people to take you seriously, you can't use Wikipedia as a source. Shame on you.

[–]Paxalot 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There are many flaws with your argument.

1) Satan was not the snake

2) God threw the first couple out of the garden because he was afraid they would become immortal as well.

3) God created evil, pain and suffering to keep man in his place, not because they did anything wrong.

4) Later God reconsidered (I know, I know, strange for an all-knowing God) and decided mankind might get back in heaven but only if they gave up their free will and became mindless, worshipping machines. There is no free will in heaven. God tried that once and created Hell.

5) It was all God's plan and his many changes of mind, jealousy, murderous orders and raping of virgins were God just being boss.

6) Satan works for God.

[–]microvirus6 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is not even logical in the simplest of ways. It seems like a parody of itself.

[–]hbdom 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This ridiculous circular logic.

[–]xbioxjim 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

ok i get that you guys are atheist but do you really have to relentlessly bash Christians for having faith i have nothing against you but it's just cold hearted anger so will someone please explain to me why you do it whats the point? also just wanted to point out that if this sounded like an attack on you it is not just want to understand. thank you

[–]nymeriastark 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

so you don't believe in the fictional character of God, yet you believe in the fictional character of Satan?

[–]sleepyfan 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you acknowledge the existence of God and Satan you are not an atheist. If you think Satan if more powerful than God you are not an atheist. I'm not sure what you are. Its one thing to say you don't believe in any god and say you believe in science, but to say Satan is more powerful than God, i really cannot understand this.

[–]idiot-detector 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Scumbag Atheists. Believe in the Devil but not God.

[–]svlad 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is stupid. Satan, as modern day Christians think of him, is not even in the bible. What modern Christians think of as Satan is actually an amalgamation of several different characters from Christian religious writings.

So, to even bother quoting those sections of the Bible is retarded.

I am an atheist and believe Christianity is as idiotic as other religions, but come on. This "info"graphic is just fucking retarded.

[–]cephalopod11 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm sorry, but I just got totally swamped by the crazy changing fonts and colors. Great message, though, and very evocative!

[–]ASlyGuy 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Scumbag God

God makes Adam & Eve dumb as shit. Satan tricks them. God gets pissed at Adam & Eve.

[–]comprehension 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

From a christian standpoint (not that I am), the serpent isn't necessarily Satan.

historically the serpent potentially came from another creation myth from another older religion. In which the serpent was a positive creative force. Via argument, the serpent was generated as a negative force in the old testament as part of the creation myth, in order to help convert those of the other faith. This was to show the people that they had been lead astray by the serpent.

As for why "we" go to hell, I believe the situation is much more complicated than brought up here. It's true that sin is the dividing factor, and that without original sin we supposedly wouldn't continue to sin therefore no one would have gone to hell. But it's almost like God doesn't want to be in contact with a sinner's soul after it departs, and that separation from the holy body is "hell" (I mention it this way since hell is not really mentioned in old testament, it is almost purely a christian developed idea.)

The reason I brought up the division, is that I feel that it's important to note that if the serpent isn't satan, then it wasn't satan's actions that doom men to hell. It was man's action in it'self, through the free will that was brought about by the twisting of a snake's lies. The "morning star" seems to a latter identity that continues to turn the spirits of man against God.

Supposedly, again the information regarding Satan himself is pretty limited in the bible. Most of what you hear taught in church is extruded from other sources and their own leadership.

[–]DamnSpamFilter 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You shouldn't believe either exist. So whether one is 'stronger' than the other is irrelevant.

[–]awe300 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Satan does also not exist

[–]GreyFoxSolid 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Listen, I do find this thought provoking, but I have to point a few things out

While much of Christianity has become distorted and nonsensical in the modern day, as agnostics/atheists, we must concede a few things. First, Christianity has been around for a very long time. And during this long period of time, there have been many theist philosophers and scholars who have thought long and hard about all of this.

The general conclusion in the field of smart, questioning Christians seems to be that the devil and God are working together. God wants us to think our own ways out of eternal damnation. Ways that prove that we are good people that are deserving of a place in heaven.

Now, I am not religious, and I will say that the majority of the people who are religious that I know probably haven't thought this far into it, mainly because most of them are not willing to entertain thoughts questioning of their faith. But there have been many who have thought about it long and hard in their religious days, including myself. Thousands of years of time tends to be enough to clear up such fallacies. Not to say that every aspect of religion has been logically cleared, I'm just sayin'.

[–]BlindThievery 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If they were real, it makes more sense to follow the devil. Think about this:

You have God and Jesus on one side and the devil on the other.

Reverse the word/name God...dog (like a hot dog), Reverse Jesus...susej (sounds like sausage),

now reverse devil...lived.

So, would you rather follow processed meats or a guy who lived?

-explained to me by my ent friend.

[–]qua_omsa_lajeeone 0 points1 point ago

Here is the theological answer, not that any of you care:

Article 1. Whether the devil is directly the cause of man's sinning?

Objection 1. It would seem that the devil is directly the cause of man's sinning. For sin consists directly in an act of the appetite. Now Augustine says (De Trin. iv, 12) that "the devil inspires his friends with evil desires"; and Bede, commenting on Acts 5:3, says that the devil "draws the mind to evil desires"; and Isidore says (De Summo Bono ii, 41; iii, 5) that the devil "fills men's hearts with secret lusts." Therefore the devil is directly the cause of sin.

Objection 2. Further, Jerome says (Contra Jovin. ii, 2) that "as God is the perfecter of good, so is the devil the perfecter of evil." But God is directly the cause of our good. Therefore the devil is directly the cause of our sins.

Objection 3. Further, the Philosopher says in a chapter of the Eudemein Ethics (vii, 18): "There must needs be some extrinsic principle of human counsel." Now human counsel is not only about good things but also about evil things. Therefore, as God moves man to take good counsel, and so is the cause of good, so the devil moves him to take evil counsel, and consequently is directly the cause of sin.

On the contrary, Augustine proves (De Lib. Arb. i, 11) that "nothing else than his own will makes man's mind the slave of his desire." Now man does not become a slave to his desires, except through sin. Therefore the cause of sin cannot be the devil, but man's own will alone.

I answer that, Sin is an action: so that a thing can be directly the cause of sin, in the same way as anyone is directly the cause of an action; and this can only happen by moving that action's proper principle to act. Now the proper principle of a sinful action is the will, since every sin is voluntary. Consequently nothing can be directly the cause of sin, except that which can move the will to act.

Now the will, as stated above (9, A3,4,6), can be moved by two things: first by its object, inasmuch as the apprehended appetible is said to move the appetite: secondly by that agent which moves the will inwardly to will, and this is no other than the will itself, or God, as was shown above (9, A3,4,6). Now God cannot be the cause of sin, as stated above (Question 79, Article 1). Therefore it follows that in this respect, a man's will alone is directly the cause of his sin.

As regards the object, a thing may be understood as moving the will in three ways. First, the object itself which is proposed to the will: thus we say that food arouses man's desire to eat. Secondly, he that proposes or offers this object. Thirdly, he that persuades the will that the object proposed has an aspect of good, because he also, in a fashion, offers the will its proper object, which is a real or apparent good of reason. Accordingly, in the first way the sensible things, which approach from without, move a man's will to sin. In the second and third ways, either the devil or a man may incite to sin, either by offering an object of appetite to the senses, or by persuading the reason. But in none of these three ways can anything be the direct cause of sin, because the will is not, of necessity, moved by any object except the last end, as stated above (10, A1,2). Consequently neither the thing offered from without, nor he that proposes it, nor he that persuades, is the sufficient cause of sin. Therefore it follows that the devil is a cause of sin, neither directly nor sufficiently, but only by persuasion, or by proposing the object of appetite.

Reply to Objection 1. All these, and other like authorities, if we meet with them, are to be understood as denoting that the devil induces man to affection for a sin, either by suggesting to him, or by offering him objects of appetite.

Reply to Objection 2. This comparison is true in so far as the devil is somewhat the cause of our sins, even as God is in a certain way the cause of our good actions, but does not extend to the mode of causation: for God causes good things in us by moving the will inwardly, whereas the devil cannot move us in this way.

Reply to Objection 3. God is the universal principle of all inward movements of man; but that the human will be determined to an evil counsel, is directly due to the human will, and to the devil as persuading or offering the object of appetite.

Article 4. Whether all the sins of men are due to the devil's suggestion?

Objection 1. It would seem that all the sins of men are due to the devil's suggestion. For Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv) that the "crowd of demons are the cause of all evils, both to themselves and to others."

Objection 2. Further, whoever sins mortally, becomes the slave of the devil, according to John 8:34: "Whosoever committeth sin is the slave [Douay: 'servant'] of sin." Now "by whom a man is overcome, of the same also he is the slave" (2 Peter 2:19). Therefore whoever commits a sin, has been overcome by the devil.

Objection 3. Further, Gregory says (Moral. iv, 10) the sin of the devil is irreparable, because he sinned at no other's suggestion. Therefore, if any men were to sin of their own free-will and without suggestion from any other, their sin would be irremediable: which is clearly false. Therefore all the sins of men are due to the devil's suggestion.

On the contrary, It is written (De Eccl. Dogm. lxxxii): "Not all our evil thoughts are incited by the devil; sometimes they are due to a movement of the free-will."

I answer that, the devil is the occasional and indirect cause of all our sins, in so far as he induced the first man to sin, by reason of whose sin human nature is so infected, that we are all prone to sin: even as the burning of wood might be imputed to the man who dried the wood so as to make it easily inflammable. He is not, however, the direct cause of all the sins of men, as though each were the result of his suggestion. Origen proves this (Peri Archon iii, 2) from the fact that even if the devil were no more, men would still have the desire for food, sexual pleasures and the like; which desire might be inordinate, unless it were subordinate to reason, a matter that is subject to the free-will.

Reply to Objection 1. The crowd of demons are the cause of all our evils, as regards their original cause, as stated.

Reply to Objection 2. A man becomes another's slave not only by being overcome by him, but also by subjecting himself to him spontaneously: it is thus that one who sins of his own accord, becomes the slave of the devil.

Reply to Objection 3. The devil's sin was irremediable, not only because he sinned without another's suggestion; but also because he was not already prone to sin, on account of any previous sin; which can be said of no sin of man.

[–]the_enginerd 0 points1 point ago

Nowhere in your evidence does it speak of power or intelligence. I understand your desire to equate these things to human qualities but The logic here just isn't sound.