this post was submitted on
324 points (59% like it)
1,016 up votes 692 down votes

todayilearned

subscribe1,830,420 readers

You learn something new every day; what did you learn today?

Submit interesting and specific facts that you just found out (not broad information you looked up, TodayILearned is not /r/wikipedia).

Posting rules

  1. Submissions must be verifiable. Please link directly to a reliable source that supports the claim in your post title. Images alone do not count as valid references. Videos are fine so long as they come from reputable sources (e.g. BBC, discovery, etc).

  2. No personal opinions, anecdotes or subjective statements (e.g "TIL xyz is a great movie").

  3. No news or recent sources. News and any sources (blog, article, press release, video, etc.) more recent than two months are not allowed.

  4. No politics. Historical politics are fine, but anything relating to current politics/politicians is not allowed.

  5. No misleading claims. Posts that omit essential information, or present unrelated facts in a way that suggest a connection, will be removed.

  6. Rephrase your post title if the following are not met:

    1. Titles must begin with "TIL ..."
    2. Make them descriptive, concise and specific (e.g. not "TIL something interesting about bacon").
    3. Titles must be able to stand on their own without requiring readers to click on a link. Starting your title with a why/what/who/where/how modifier should be unnecessary.
    4. "TIL about ..." and other broad posts don't belong on TIL. Try /r/Wikipedia, etc. instead, or be more specific (and avoid the word "about").
    5. "TIL how to ..." posts belong on /r/HowTo.
  7. No trivial or obvious facts (e.g. "TIL the sky is blue"), or facts that appeal only to a narrow audience, specifically no software/website tips (e.g. "TIL you can click on widgets in WidgetMaker 1.22").

(Why we need rules and the TIL FAQ)

Additional info

If your post does not appear in the new queue and you think it meets the above rules, please contact the moderators (include a link to your reddit.com post, not your story).

Please report spam, inaccurate or otherwise inappropriate posts by messaging the moderators), as this helps us remove them more quickly!

Etiquette

We ask that you please do the following:

  1. avoid mobile versions of websites (e.g. m.wikipedia.org)

  2. link to the appropriate heading when referencing an article (particularly on Wikipedia)

  3. link to the appropriate start time when referencing videos (e.g. on YouTube)

  4. add [PDF] or [NSFW] tags to your posts, as necessary.

Please also read the site-wide Reddiquette.


Talk with us on IRC: #todayIlearned on irc.freenode.org, or just click here.

Hi Steve. ;) - El Presidente

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 224

[–]Lunares 205 points206 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Most of those "cables" are the pinnacle of 30 years of fiber optic research. These are 4000km of glass all spun to be exactly 10um in diameter, all exactly the same. Every 100km or so there is an amplifier, under the ocean, that takes this light signal and makes it exactly as it was before. We are able to send this light pulse across 4000km, with all sorts of spreading and other issues and still be able to determine "0 or 1". All at the rate of 10Gbit/s. Current research is moving towards 100Gbit/s by putting hundreds of wavelengths on a single cable!

So no, these are not just cables under the sea. They are much more impressive, and unlikely to ever be taken over by satellites for bandwidth purposes.

[–]jasonw56k 28 points29 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

how do those amplifiers get power?

[–]Lunares 53 points54 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Part of the cable jacket is an electrical cable which provides power.

[–]aarghIforget 41 points42 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What? They run on electricity? But that technology is centuries old!

[–]dissonance07 23 points24 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Check out this article from Wired, 15 years ago. It's a fascinating look at the globe-trotting renegades who install these things. The author describes this, among other issues. As noted elsewhere, there is a power cable bundled with the fiber-optic cable that powers these repeaters in series.

[–]tomkandy 18 points19 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In case anyone needs further encouragement to click that link, or does so and misses this - that's written by Neal Stephenson. It's a fantastic read.

[–]Freakazo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But there are so many words... I like words.

[–]Freakazo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And that's what you get when you comment on reddit with a high dosage of sleeping pills... My Apologies.

[–]dinolex[S] 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"Repeaters are powered by a constant direct current passed down the conductor near the center of the cable, so all repeaters in a cable are in series. Power feed equipment is installed at the terminal stations. Typically both ends share the current generation with one end providing a positive voltage and the other a negative voltage. A virtual earth point exists roughly half way along the cable under normal operation. The amplifiers or repeaters derive their power from the potential difference drop across them.

The optic fiber used in undersea cables is chosen for its exceptional clarity, permitting runs of more than 100 kilometers between repeaters to minimize the number of amplifiers and the distortion they cause."

Source: WikiPedia

[–]Matt872000 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Here is a video of them laying the cables from Greenland to St John's, Newfoundland, Canada. Not super informative but they show the cable and the repeaters as well as a tour of the ship.

[–]SophisticatedVagrant 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Odd (and annoying) choice of music...

[–]suburban_war 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

and for anything that can't tolerate high latency, satellites will never compete.

[–]idiotthethird 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's why we need the ansible. I'll be in my lab.

[–]anxiousalpaca 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

neutrino satellites... maybe one day ;)

[–]imsabbel 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You aer already behind the times.

Modern cables are already much faster.

TAT-14, for example, is a 10 year old cable, and is running at nearly 2000Gbit/s.

Modern DWDM schemes have no problem fitting 100 channels of 25 or 50Gbit into a single fibre.

[–]Lunares 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

True I was unclear, the 100Gbit/s remark is per wavelength.

[–]IamGrimReefer 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

this shit always blows my mind.

i often think about how cool/impressive that is. having cables stretch across oceans. amazing.

how deep are they? do they rest on the ocean floor? seems like it would be too deep, lots more vertical cable instead of horizontal.

[–]Lunares 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

They pretty much just rest on the ocean floor yea. I don't know how they choose the path to take, I would assume they try to avoid chasms and such as much as possible. The ocean floor is actually pretty flat for the most part so you don't really have that much vertical depth. Having the cable float is just asking for increasing damage.

[–]dinolex[S] 9 points10 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Actually it rests under the ocean floor.

"Cables can be broken by fishing trawlers, anchors, earthquakes, turbidity currents and even shark bites.[19] Based on surveying breaks in the Atlantic Ocean and the Caribbean Sea, it was found that between 1959 and 1996 less than 9% were due to natural events. In response to this self-imposed threat to the communications network, the practice of cable burial has developed."

Source

[–]imjesusbitch 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Average depth of the Atlantic Ocean is around 4000 meters; this pdf from the ICPC says cable is buried from shore extending out to depths of 2000m of water. Stops most trawlers from damaging a cable.

[–]dinolex[S] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Do you know what allows the signal to be sent the 100km? For some reason, I was thinking the standard 1 Gbit/s that I've used had a much shorter distance. Is it cable quality or light intensity?

[–]Lunares 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Basically it's super good cable quality. SMF-28 (the standard single mode fiber) has a loss of .2dB/km at 1550nm (the middle wavelength used for comm). So that means over 100km of distance you only have 20dB, or 100x loss. For an optical signal 1% is more than enough to be reamplified without introducing too much noise.

[–]the-fritz 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In fact so good, that fiber optics is limited by dispersion and not attenuation.

[–]the-fritz 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Exactly! Those cables are NO old technology! They are the latest and greatest from fiber optics research. Satellites have a longer delay and a far more limited bandwidth. And GEO space is getting limited.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

♪ Under da sea, under da see! ♪

[–]dinolex[S] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I've already read up on it but thank you for posting this information here. You explained it in a nice and simple way.

[–]NorthernerWuwu 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Psst, Alt-0181.

[–]ZoVoS -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

bah all the good comments are taken :'( up-vote for you sir. Id like to add the latency of satellite round trips would be horrid

[–]jellicle -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And most interestingly, the United States has wiretapped most if not all of the world's undersea cables, using several submarines to install taps on the cables after they've been laid. USS Parche was modified to be able to tap cables in place, and the USS Jimmy Carter was purpose-built for doing so.

When you send any internet data or voice call that travels over one of these cables, the U.S. National Security Agency is on the BCC: list.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]oskuskaktus 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That is not the only problem this map has, it also carries wrong information of cables in use being marked as planned.

[–]pandubear 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Doesn't that just mean it's old - since then planned cables have been installed?

[–]ninepointsix 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it's exactly a factor of 8 :)

[–]dinolex[S] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]ChrisHansensVoice 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I prefer to use this to remember the difference

http://i.imgur.com/82KwG.jpg

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I giggled :) And I'm not even a fan of the movies.

[–]suburban_war 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The grammar of "a second" bugs me almost as much. It is "per second" you fools! Pedants unite :)

[–][deleted] 82 points83 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well duh.

[–]sjclark 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'll say.

[–]YouAreDumb668 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I can understand why this is TIL, BUT... Physical communication will ALWAYS be ahead of wireless communications. Think about it. Your modem is way faster than WI-FI. Maybe it's because I am an Electrical Engineer with focus in Telecomm but this should be common knowledge amoung the the Reddit community. If you have any questions feel free to ask, I am studying at Georgia Tech, a top 5 institution and know tons about Telecomm.

[–]abandonedNL 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Your modem is way faster than WI-FI.

When you write things like this, I really start to doubt your credentials. I know what you mean, but it just looks like something my mom would write.

Not to mention:

Physical communication will ALWAYS be ahead of wireless communications.

Physical communication? Satellite links have a physical layer too; it's just not a wire.

[–]woopwoopskadoop 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

rofl you're just being argumentative, you knew exactly what he meant when he said physical communication. (though you are technically correct, the best kind of correct)

[–]Borkz 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A modem isnt analogousto wifi.

[–]woopwoopskadoop -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Umm I know? wifi is a protocol that uses a modem. I am not exactly sure what your point was since I wasn't even commenting on the wifi part of his post...

[–]YouAreDumb668 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Since the OP obviously didn't understand how networks work I had to explain it to him like I explain network things to my mom. Very simplistic yet she can understand it.

[–]Farfecknugat 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Think about it. Your modem is way faster than WI-FI.

Really? I dont think my ISP is giving me 54mb/s

[–]CarolusMagnus 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Really? I dont think my ISP is giving me 54mb/s

Yes he is. If you are willing to pay for it, they'll happily string a 1Gb cable to your door. (Nobody said it'd be cheap, though).

[–]SisterPhister 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Where do you live?

Plenty of places have no option to get service such as this.

[–]CarolusMagnus 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I happen to live less than a mile from the nearest phat pipe, so that getting a 1Gb connection would only put me back a 4 or 5 digit sum. But that is missing the point: There's always the option to get it; AT&T or Alcatel will dig some fibre for you even if you live in flyover country or on a Pacific island. It might cost an 8/9/10 digit-sum, but people have it done all the time -- because it is still orders of magnitude cheaper/faster than wireless. (Especially if latency is important.)

[–][deleted] ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]TrickyTramp 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm at tech too!

[–]siamlloyd 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How can I save on long distance calls?

[–]tyquasia111 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

10-10-321?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Skype?

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You are absolutely right and I'm perfectly aware of that. Also, I did know that "some" lines were laid under the sea for purposes of telecomm. but I wasn't aware until recently as to how huge and sophisticated this network in fact is.

Where do you see telecomm. going in the next 10 years? Are optical fibers the current peak of wired data transfer or is there something new on the horizon? Or are they simply going to stuff more and more data through existing lines at different frequencies?

[–]imsabbel 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There is tons of headroom in optical fibres.

If you pay for the expensive repeaters and endpoints, you could put 10s of TBits on a single cable even with current technology.

In laboratories, >100TBits have already been archived. With a single fibre. And those fibres are so small you could put 100 in the diameter of a pencil.

The next 10, or 20 years, no change at all would make sense. Even 50+ years, if there is no breakthrough like quantum-whatever, fibre will rule.

[–]NorthernerWuwu 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The trunks are a pretty big deal really.

Don't you recall any of the outages world-wide where a serious cable got severed? It still happens (although rarely and there is generally redundancy) and is an ongoing concern. Heck, there has been concern about them being intentionally severed in a war setting for many decades.

[–]darksim905 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I guess you missed that post on how undersea cables are laid. I forgot what sub-reddit it was posted to, either /r/cableporn or just /r/videos, but it was pretty damn cool.

[–]walrus0 -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My modem is faster than wifi?

ADSL2+ is considerably slower than the speed I can copy files from my laptop to my home server over a 20MHz channel, 2.4 GHz 802.11n 2x2 MIMO connection at 85 Mbps.

[–]34Mbit 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Take your laptop a few miles down town into your telecoms exchange and see how fast you can access your home server wirelessly.

802.11n at 15 metres is 85mbit/s in one direction. A twenty-five year old SONET circuit would get you more than ten times that in full duplex, at twice the distance. Modern L2 technology would push even further.

[–]walrus0 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

no shit, but they're for different purposes. ADSL2+ is, well, DSL, it's a MAN networking technology. The average 802.11n MIMO WAP with an omni antenna is intended for in-building, LAN connections.

for the record, I've used 802.11n-2009 2x2 MIMO 5.8GHz gear to build 85Mbps point to point bridges of 75 km (Ubiquiti Rocket M5 and RocketDish 34dB), so it's not a limitation of the technology, it's a limitation of the antenna use, noise floor, available frequencies, fresnel zone and so forth. Standard PTP microwave link budget stuff.

[–]34Mbit 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You got sustained 85mbps at 75km? That's amazing. I tried my hand at long-range 802.11g links with two wrt54g boxes back in the day using a pringle tube, and couldn't get much more than 2mbps on a BERT test at around 3km.

[–]walrus0 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it's pretty easy to do provided you have a truly clear fresnel zone, 20MHz channel available, and 3' 5.7/5.8GHz dual polarity dishes with radomes (about $500 a piece). the ubnt MIMO radios are $89 each.

that's an 85Mbps iperf test going one way. if the link is truly loaded to its max in both directions simultaneously the aggregate capacity is about 130 to 140 Mbps (divide by two if you're running two iperf tests at the same time each going a different direction), so about 70Mbps.

[–]a_can_of_solo 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

yeah but Ethernet is faster then wi-fi

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

he was talking about physical connections. your modem is connected to your isp, miles and miles away and you still load web pages in a matter of a few seconds; that would not be possible over wireless (you know, satellite internet). and when talking about about connection speed alone, 85 Mbps pales in comparison to the 1 Gbps connections routers and computers are more commonly supporting. so yes, your modem is considerably faster than wifi. you used a lot of technical jargon, but do you really know what you're talking about?

[–]walrus0 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Actually wireless point to point links of 5 to 10km are possible at full duplex 1Gbps (see: Bridgewave 80GHz), if you have the clear line of sight, clear fresnel zone, rooftop access, and $25,000 to spend. I agree that ADSL2+ and wifi are completely different things, it's like comparing a pomegranate to a potato.

[–]Vectoor 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

100 mbit fiber internet here. Life is good ;)

[–]TONEandBARS -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Huh? My wireless is far faster than my ADSL modem... what're you talking about?

[–]34Mbit 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Your DSL modem is operating at a distance of what, a few miles? Try running omnidirectional WiFi at that distance.

Guided > unguided

[–]Rusted_Satellites 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Geosynchronous satellites are far enough away that you start getting significant speed of light delays.

Something I learned from engineering is that light is actually really slow. Another example: if you have a 3 GHz processor, light travels about 4 inches during one clock cycle.

[–]UsuRpergoat 23 points24 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Can we get some more fucking bandwidth please? Sincerely, Australia.

[–]JP-84 10 points11 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

last thing I did before I closed the tab was look at australia. laughs were had

[–]yoho139 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Now look at Ireland. Explains how my connection is so slow...

[–]wakeuph8 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

We actually have quite good connections, and a new one coming in soon - 11 to be exact, If i'm correct!

It all boils down to who's providing you etc. Virgin Media up north can easily push 50 - 100Meg to your door.

[–]yoho139 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yay vodafone! I get 5mbps down and 3mbps up on a good day..

[–]connundrummer 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm In the U.S. and I get 1mbps down on a good day.

[–]yoho139 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Damn Comcast. (that's the bad one, right?)

[–]jamesrom 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'd put money on the bottleneck lying somewhere between your home and the the transoceanic fibre cables.

Crappy infrastructure is crappy. Bring on NBN!

[–]mypetridish 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

in what events would the kangaroos need internet?

we'll give you some if nuclear war ever breaks out.

[–]Spoggerific 37 points38 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm sorry, but could you please post this at a smaller resolution with more compression? I still seem to be able to read it, and that just won't do.

[–]TheBigB86 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Here's an interactive cable map: cablemap.info

[–]President-Nulagi 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Came here to post that, well played sir

[–]dinolex[S] 7 points8 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's the highest resolution I could find. I didn't create nor alter the picture in any way.

Here's another pic in high-res http://eumvno.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/2010_0629_cablemap_telegeography.jpg

[–]Hamspankin 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]ChrisHansensVoice 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

that was really interesting. And some really good extra lectures in the 'linked videos' section.

[–]dinolex[S] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thanks!

[–]LBORBAH 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I have actually worked on setting up the head end of several cables terminating in NYC.

[–]34Mbit 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

NY to Oxwich?

[–]LBORBAH 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

1986 PTAT lightwave spectrum first private fiber for telephone, landfall was in Manesquan NJ, up to NY across the Hudson and the terminus was 60 Hudson st. the old venerable Western Union Bldg. Sprint bought it the first day transmission was verified and fired every one , I was with a subcontractor so it did not affect me.

[–]omg_my_ex_is_crazy 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I have probably visited the head end you speak of.

[–]fulltimegeek 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

One good reason: Latency.

[–]db2 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A full two second latency. That's 2,000 miliseconds for those who suck at mathiness.

[–]walrus0 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

best case satellite latency is about 495ms. more typically 700 ms. that's for two full roundtrips to ping something on the other side of a connection (from your terminal, going 32,768km up to the satellite, 32,768km down to the other end, an ACK is generated and makes a further 32,768km * 2 trip back to the satellite and back to you).

[–]db2 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Shit, you're right. I only counted half!

[–]takes22tango 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My great-grandfather... this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Ellsworth_Buckley yeah....

[–]palindromic_prime 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I thought they were delivered on the world railroad tracks... THIS-A-WAY

[–]Matt872000 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I love the German flag from Frankfurt to Nanjing...

[–]Jaerdo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I like how Calgary and Vancouver are further North than Edmonton.

../Albertan

[–]I_MOLEST_CHILDREN 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Calgary always getting in our Northern people's business.

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What the...? O_o What's the story behind that pic?

[–]Vectoor 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's a map of the London subway remade into a map of the world. Not very accurate.

[–]Hellman109 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Who moved Melbourne to Adelaide?

[–]arebe2 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Read Cryptonomicon. It will change your worldview.

[–]dinolex[S] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hmm my gf recommended it too. Guess I better get it :)

[–]itsamario 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Naturally having just finished that book, I did a quick search for this comment :) It was a pretty good book don't get me wrong but far too many characters and digressions for me personally. I am going to check out "reamde" by Neal Stephenson soon (readme file spelled wrong).

[–]arebe2 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Honestly, I agree, and I think Snow Crash is a much better book overall. However, I think the way Cryptonomicon incorporates historical events into the storyline makes it an interesting read, even if it does suffer from detours and odd character-development explanations.

[–]itsamario 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes Snow Crash was an amazing book imho.

[–]tankjr 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was thinking about this earlier today. That would certainly throw a monkey wrench in the plans of corporations to outsource helpdesk work abroad if these lines were to be cut.

[–]a_can_of_solo 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

that happened a few years ago, two major under sea cables were damaged

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]murrdpirate 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hey, corporations are people too.

[–]SpoonHandle 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

As you can see in the image there is a good amount of redundancy in case one goes down.

[–]tankjr 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Looks to me like cutting the cables in the Red Sea could be done all at once and it would cripple telecommunications to India.

[–]mypetridish 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

the cables you see bundled together are actually far from each other. in fact the cables you see here are not representative of the actual routes they take.

[–]tankjr 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Doubtful. Topographical preferences would be common

[–]mypetridish 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

so you think there's only one drain at the bottom of the sea? they spread it out because they do not want a single event to cut off a bundle of connections just like how you thought could happen.

[–]tankjr 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

h-hay! Hyperbole!

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]tankjr 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

With double the latency and half of the bandwidth.

[–]Iottiak 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It would also fuck up telecommunications for the rest of the world by clogging up on all of the other lines.

[–]Kenjiee 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

this graf shows status of 2007

[–]umibozu 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You should read "how the world was one"

[–]walrus0 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

a single pair of singlemode fibers can carry vastly more data than an entire $300 million telecom satellite.

40 Gbps * 80 DWDM wavelengths = 3200Gbps per fiber pair.

of course the terminal equipment on both ends to route and mux/demux 80 wavelengths @ 40Gbps (Infinera, for example) is rather expensive as well. but less costly than putting 6000 kilogram things in orbit 32,768km away.

[–]Matt872000 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Down where it's wetter, down where it's better...

[–]Bored_At_Night 4 points5 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Take it from me.

[–]MasterOfSpamz 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Up on the shore they work all day.

[–]Bored_At_Night 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Out in the sun they slave away.

[–]dinolex[S] 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Uhmm lol :)

[–]tweakingforjesus 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]LiveLikeLuis 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Like some kind of... some kind of... series of tubes!!!!

[–]devilrays 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

North Korea- "fuck it, we don't need any"

[–]jaze321 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Working in telecommunications for the last 10yrs for one of the companies that has the largest backbone networks in the world I can tell you that every single call you make whether it be cell or landline will travel over fiberoptic cable through a wire-line backbone network.

[–]34Mbit 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

True for the most part. I have seen trunk SDH microwave networks used for government circuits, however.

[–]jaze321 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Most of the mountainous area of south america and hawaii use microwave towers however it is usually converted at some point back into an electical or optical signal to travel between POPs or Regenerators.

[–]pizzasnail 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The internet really is a series of tubes.

[–]BCMM 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is not just because of bandwidth. The round-trip time for a signal that's bounced off a geostationary satellite on both legs is about half a second at best (standing "right under the satellite", and with no other sources of latency, such as codec runtime).

That's enough to noticably interfere with a phone conversation.

[–]Lossothi 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

WTF? Everyone knows that the internet etc. go through the optic cables, as the satellite transmission is very expensive.

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Aye aye captain obvious. Have mercy on us less intelligent ones >_>

[–]Ahmon 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Modern undersea cables are revolutionary shit -- far more modern than satellites.

[–]nanowerx 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

One thing that I question....what happens as the Earth plates shift? Aren't certain bodies of land moving toward or away others? Wouldn't these cables stretch or do they already have something in place to prepare for such things. I know continental shift is slow, but some of these cable have apparently been under water as early as the late-20's(they may have been replaced over time, not sure).

[–]34Mbit 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The first cables were laid in the 19th century by Cable & Wireless. They are long disconnected now, and I don't know of any operational copper lines.

[–]dinolex[S] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm pretty sure they take that into account.

[–]obsmike92 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

My dad's company is the one that builds a majority of those cables. most are at least half a foot in diameter

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What's the name of that company? Could you give us some more insight information?

[–]obsmike92 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Okonite Cable Inc, based out of PAterson in New Jersey. My dad is only part of the maintenance for their machinery, but from what he tells me, the cable industry is going to be booming int he next couple of years if our infrastructure starts becoming a larger issue

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I might be moving to NJ next year. Maybe your dad can help me get a foot in the door in that company :)

Also, thanks for the info!

[–]JD_SLICK 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

the next major war, if we ever have one, will feature a ton of cable snipping.

[–]abagofdicks 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Under the sea Under the sea Darling it's better Down where it's wetter Take it from me

[–]Zsamot 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

So, the world is really this connected to each other and we still are ignorant of other cultures.

[–]kevsequeira 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I've seen the cables that come ashore in India. They provide communication services to South Asia, Middle East and Western Europe. Its pretty cool to think that if I just cut a few wires, half the world would not have any internet.

[–]nanowerx 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That is actually pretty scary, not exactly "cool."

[–]MotharChoddar 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Come on. It's pretty cool.

[–]kevsequeira 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Exactly, think of it this way, for all the shit India has with Pakistan, all we need to do is unplug a few wires and BAM no communication.

[–]fournuts 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Why are undersea cables being strewn along coastlines? Are the water cables cheaper than land-based cables?

[–]DaydreamKid 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

They were put there by Aquaman.

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Finally he's useful for something :)

[–]Ragnalypse 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think the majority of the word's communications are intra-national, or at least intra-continental.

[–]JustinTime112 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Said Ragnalypse through the internet.

[–]Ragnalypse 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To people through an intra-national cable.

[–]solarsavior 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Exactly. Network latency is also a strong factor in where you get information from. Global Load Balancing is used to direct you to the nearest server in the world when you request websites and such. Why? When you load up a web page (for example) packets pass in BOTH directions to load the page. This lag becomes more evident when you download something from the other side of the planet and slows communications.

[–]somenewuser 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The phenomenon of directing users to local systems has been around so long, it spawned a rhyme years ago:

A host is a host from coast to coast,

and no one will talk to a host that's close,

unless the host (that isn't close),

is busy, hung, or dead.

[–]zaphodxlii 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"The SeaMeWe-3 system. . ." made me chuckle. (In the mid-bottom area of the picture).

[–]kevsequeira 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't know how the engineers manage to say it with a straight face. I always laughed when they did.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Remember when a bunch of them got "mysteriously" cut within a short span of time? Whatever happened with that? Seemed awful coincidental to be accidental

[–]dinolex[S] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]Kaarkelo 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

TIL: they have 1 cable going to Canada, and its to Newfoundland of all places, where as the state of Alaska has about 10 alone? LOLWHUT?!

[–]d0nu7 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Most of Canada's 'net probably just comes through the US first.

[–]Timmetie 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Satellites can only use, and fill up, the available wavelengths. Cables can be added forever.

[–]dbcooperlives 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Tubes.

[–]dmr83457 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The reason is that satellites may be thousands of miles above the earth. It essentially boils down to whether your signal travels a portion around the earth's circumference to reach its destination, or goes up tens of thousands of miles above the earth and then back down again. The latter being many times farther in distance than the former leading to huge differences in transmission speed.

If you think about it, there is no distance shorter around a sphere than its circumference.

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

True that.

[–]Sniperchild 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

One of the cards we make at work could handle the entire throughput of the trans_Atlantic cable :P

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What card would that be?

[–]Sniperchild 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

We make AMC -Advance Mezzanine Cards that are used in comms chassis. I'm not putting details of who I work for on Reddit but they're exceptionally high throughput digital signal processing cards. The really high throuput stuff is achieved with Xilinx FPGA such as http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/fpga/index.htm

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Cool, thanks.

[–]AlwaysGettingHopOns 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'd be very impressed if someone found the picture of the connection with one of these with just one cable? I can't find it :(

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't understand the question :S

[–]Pontiflakes 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This picture is inaccurate... It doesn't have anything going through Area 51.

[–]Starslip 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How do they do maintenance on these things when they get damaged? Do they haul them to the surface to repair them or do it underwater? How big are they around?

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I encourage you to read the wikipedia article (especially the part about repairs):

"A cable repair ship will be sent to the location to drop a marker buoy near the break. Several types of grapples are used depending on the situation. If the sea bed in question is sandy, a grapple with rigid prongs is used to plough under the surface and catch the cable. If the cable is on a rocky sea surface, the grapple is more flexible, with hooks along its length so that it can adjust to the changing surface.[24] In especially deep water, the cable may not be strong enough to lift as a single unit, so a special grapple that cuts the cable soon after it has been hooked is used and only one length of cable is brought to the surface at a time, whereupon a new section is spliced in.[25] The repaired cable is longer than the original, so the excess is deliberately laid in a 'U' shape on the seabed. A submersible can be used to repair cables that lie in shallower waters"

Source

[–]DonFix 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There are a shit-ton of cables going between Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Estonia and Latvia so this picture is far from complete, just covering the major ones.

[–]dinolex[S] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Posted this earlier but you might have missed it.

http://eumvno.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/2010_0629_cablemap_telegeography.jpg

It is a more detailed and updated map (in higher resolution as well).

[–]DonFix 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

you sir are a gentleman and a scholar! This map I do approve of! Haf an upfvote.

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Glad to be of service :)

[–]EONS 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

When I was in China in 2005/2006 there was an underwater earthquake off the coast of Taiwan that severed one of the cables connecting China/East Asia to North America.

I was unable to open a single webpage for about a week.

[–]-abcd 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

downvoted for stupidity

[–]dinolex[S] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thanks ;)

[–]dissonance07 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is a terrifically interesting article about the cowboys who run those cables, written by Wired in 1996.

[–]unjustifiably_angry 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Duh.

[–]Prince_Smarming 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Unda da sea, darling it's better down where it's wetter take it from me

[–]MrVictorianNovel 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

oooooo who lives in a cable under the sea?

[–]friendlymaniac 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

not Spongebob.... *shakes head

[–]roboticinsides 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Unda da sea! Unda da sea! Down where it's wetter, take it from me.

[–]Velitatio -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You actually thought the internet was supported by satellites? ಠ_ಠ

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

wtf? how old are you, ten?

[–]Andalycia 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

you sir, are an idiot. It's a real nasty thing to scorn others for lack of knowledge in a certain area.

[–]nanowerx 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No shit, I am 28 years old and work in IT and I had no idea of the vastness of these cables. I knew there was a system in place but this is bigger than I could have ever imagined. It has me very intrigued now, I applaud OP for posting this.

[–]dinolex[S] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thank you very much.

I too was aware of a cable network existing but not to this extend until I started reading up on it, prompted by the fact that I recently got fiber optic internet (FTTH) installed at my home, which got me interested in the topic.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I am 28 years old and work in IT and I had no idea of the vastness of these cables.

not something I would admit in mixed company