use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g.reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, community...
1,368 users here now
Welcome to r/atheism, the web's largest atheist forum. All topics related to atheism, agnosticism and secular living are welcome here. Please read our FAQ.
Please link directly to any images or use imgur to avoid being flagged as blogspam
Recommended reading and viewing
Thank you notes
Related Subreddits <--the big list
Chat: #reddit-atheism on irc.freenode.net
Watch: #/r/atheism on reddit.tv
Read The FAQ
Submit Rage Comic
Submit Facebook Chat
Submit Meme
Submit Something Else
reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›
Science, you're doing it wrong. (helablog.com)
submitted 11 months ago by edesjard
[–]Chrischievous 6 points7 points8 points 11 months ago
Does anyone else REALLY want to see what that data chart contains?
It's killing me.
[–]JohnSmallBerries 6 points7 points8 points 11 months ago
I see they cropped out the Something Awful logo in the lower left corner, but left the watermark.
[–]BangsNaughtyBits 5 points6 points7 points 11 months ago
From an old Photoshop Friday.
http://www.somethingawful.com/d/photoshop-phriday/science-fair.php?page=7
Good catch.
!
[–]JohnSmallBerries 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago
Thanks for finding the source! Some of the others are hilarious.
[–]edesjard[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago
Sorry, didn't even see the watermark and thus didn't realize it could have been a repost... still, I thought it was pretty funny.
[–]AbuMaia 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago
Is that "Hypothesis: Yes" or "Hypothesis: No"? "Conclusion" looks like a "maybe".
[–]Hellasaurusrex 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago
I really wish I could get a clear view of his conclusion, but it looks like it's just the word "No" in bold letters.
[–]bobdelany 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago
If he's referring to minorities within the USA all he has to do is wait 30-40 years and he'll be one. He can re-evaluate his hypothesis then.
[–]SubtleMockery 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago
Actually, he seems to have been quite thorough. It's still science, even when you're wrong.
[–]nightzirk 1 point2 points3 points 11 months ago
My guess is that he already had a conclusion before he started looking for data.
Probably.
[–]OBrien 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago
Joseph Smith picture in the bottom right.
Yeah, those Minorities in this study are fucked.
all it takes is a username and password
create account
is it really that easy? only one way to find out...
already have an account and just want to login?
login
[–]Chrischievous 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]JohnSmallBerries 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]BangsNaughtyBits 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]JohnSmallBerries 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]edesjard[S] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]AbuMaia 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Hellasaurusrex 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]bobdelany 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]SubtleMockery 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]nightzirk 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]SubtleMockery 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]OBrien 0 points1 point2 points ago