use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g.reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
reddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, community...
1,232 users here now
Help Atheist Organizations! The Secular Student Alliance, Camp Quest, and Foundation Beyond Belief were all nominated for the Chase Community Giving program, which awards grants based on the votes of the public. Everyone gets 2 votes on Facebook, plus an additional one if they share a CCG page. The links for them are: SSA | CQ | FBB Voting runs from September 6-19
The Secular Student Alliance, Camp Quest, and Foundation Beyond Belief were all nominated for the Chase Community Giving program, which awards grants based on the votes of the public. Everyone gets 2 votes on Facebook, plus an additional one if they share a CCG page. The links for them are:
SSA | CQ | FBB
Voting runs from September 6-19
Welcome to r/atheism, the web's largest atheist forum. All topics related to atheism, agnosticism and secular living are welcome here. Please read our FAQ.
Please link directly to any images or use imgur to avoid being flagged as blogspam
Recommended reading and viewing
Thank you notes
Related Subreddits <--the big list
Chat: #reddit-atheism on irc.freenode.net
Watch: #/r/atheism on reddit.tv
Read The FAQ
Submit Rage Comic
Submit Facebook Chat
Submit Meme
Submit Something Else
reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›
This is how 9/11 truthers think (api.ning.com)
submitted 1 year ago by AtheistActivist
[–]HerrBongwasser 15 points16 points17 points 1 year ago
"it had to be an inside job, how else could the photographer haven been in this spot to capture this image so perfectly."
yeah a coworker said that today...
[–]iheartbakon 18 points19 points20 points 1 year ago
What does this have to do with atheism?
[–]Blackplatypus 6 points7 points8 points 1 year ago
You haven't noticed by now that r/atheism has a tendency to drift towards r/skepticism?
There's only so many times we can agree with each other and laugh at religious jackasses before we feel like branching out a little.
[–]NuclearWookie 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
It's just circle jerking.
[–]cypherdtraitor 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Its a subtle attempt to use argument tu toque, because most of r/atheism doesn't view 9/11 skeptically.
[–]coppersink 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Yes we do. We view 9/11 conspiracy theories VERY skeptically.
[–]HPDerpcraft 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
It's just as silly a belief as sky faeries. And also 9/11 conspiracy theorists would have you believe it wasn't a bunch of sky-fairy fanatics.
[–]josiahw 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
So... bad theory= something something religion is dumb?
[–]HPDerpcraft 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
As an atheist, all unfounded ideas are equally unfounded. There's nothing special about theological bad ideas, because it's all nonsense. In the comic above, obiwan is critiquing the WTC bombing story as though it were an "inside job," not done by religious extremists. This is parallel to the story arc in Episode IV where (I can't believe I'm explaining Star Wars on the internet) the attack on the sandcrawler was actually perpetrated by storm troopers, not the sandpeople as it was made to look.
It's really not that hard. Yes, it's tenuous, but it's related.
[–]josiahw -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
So its ok to post any unfounded idea in r/atheism?
I would argue fundamentally that /r/atheism could really be nested in r/skeptic somewhere, but it does have a particular bent. So no.
My reasoning above was prefaced by relating the picture/message/whatever to people who would deny that crazy religious extremists committed the atrocity. Yes. It's loose. Yes it's 9/11 Karma whoring, but it does have a connection.
I'm no truther, but there's no way in hell I think we've been told the whole story of what happened that day.
[–]darkangelx 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago
still waiting for a REAL video to be released on the pentagon attack...
Scumbag Government: have 1000 cameras aimed at the Pentagon
Release the footage from the 1fps guard shack at the parking garage.
[–]NuclearWookie 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Yeah, that's the main thing that give me pause: there's no way there's not more footage of an attack on the headquarters of the largest military the world has ever seen.
[–]darkangelx 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
But why wont they release it?
[–]weforgottenuno -4 points-3 points-2 points 1 year ago
Why would they release the video of people dying? That'd be kind of sick IMO.
You wouldn't be able to see any gore or individual deaths from, say, parking lot cameras that may have shown a plane crashing into an unoccupied sector of the Pentagon. We have plenty of footage of the WTC buildings being hit. Why don't we have similar footage of a building complex that must be more well monitored than a New York skyscraper?
[–]weforgottenuno 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Individuals' videotapes sent into news agencies =/= government security cameras.
[–]NuclearWookie 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Who owns the government? The citizens? As in "us"? Why would they have reason to hide footage of planes smashing into the Pentagon?
[–]wahwahwildcat 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Does anyone have a review of evidence 9/11 'truther's' use? (Preferrably from a source that won't be deemed illegitimate by either side.) I have my doubts, but I am not sold on anything other than the NOVA special I've seen. Thanks in advance!
[–]sanjiallblue 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
(Preferrably from a source that won't be deemed illegitimate by either side.)
The way conspiracy theories work (and religion for that matter) is that they reject all evidence that contradicts their crazy narrative.
[–]wahwahwildcat 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I understand.. But I meant from a real source... Something like NBC, ABC? New York Times?
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
well there was a debate between the loose change guys and popular mechanics. It is pretty easy to see that the conspiracy theories just fall apart.
Perfect! Muchos gracias. = )
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
De Nada
[–]platotld 0 points1 point2 points 12 months ago
popular mechcanics should arugue with these gents :
http://www.ae911truth.org
[–]mc_curtis10 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Honestly, if 9/11 was an inside job, then NBC, ABC, and all of the other of major news outlets would be the least likely sources to provide legitimate evidence against the widely accepted understanding of 9/11. Any entity that could and would orchestrate something like 9/11 would have the power to manipulate the media into not providing thought provoking or controversial points on the subject. Simply put, as the media can be a tool of those in power, anything that the perpetrators think can be threatening, simply wouldn't be reported by a real source.
[–]d3adbor3d2 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Oh yea, the same NBC who was owned by GE which is a weapons manufacturer. Do you recall the massive push these networks did to invade Iraq?
How about nist, or 1000 engineers.
Read and question all I ask, conclude for yourself what is right. Rely on one one but yourself to seek the answers.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm
http://www.wtc7.net/
start here
Use logic, wtc7 falls in under 10 seconds, straight down. ANd it was not a controlled demo? Do explain?
[–]eromitlab 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
If it criticizes trutherdom, it will be rejected out of hand for that reason alone. Think of how truthers cite verbal slip-ups as evidence of their conspiracy. People whose words are never to be trusted suddenly become trustworthy when they say missile instead of plane, then immediately become untrustworthy again afterward.
I understand man. I'm not arguing that. I just wanted to see their 'evidence' without having to sit through some seminar, or read Jesse Ventura's book. haha
[–]creakybulks 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Their evidence mostly consists of video clips and "strange" photographs and cherry picked witness testimony taken within the first six or seven hours of the attacks. You know, when smoke and ruin basically covered the entirety of Manhattan, obscuring the crash sites.
[–]Kennian -5 points-4 points-3 points 1 year ago
there was a diagram of the pentagon, showing how it wasnt a plane that hit it...i think.
After Oklahoma City, i can see the government doing pritty much anything, so i guess it's possible
[–]tuber[] 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Because it lumps the most rational inquiry together with the most foolhardy, the label "9/11 truther" is used categorically dismiss those who inquire into the events leading up to 9/11.
the label "9/11 truther" is used categorically dismiss those who inquire into the events leading up to 9/11.
I only use this label for those who state explosives were used to demolish the buildings, or some of the more fanciful theories, such as misslies attacking the pentagon or remote controlled planes.
[–]Anzereke 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
Okay let's all stop the piss take on truthers. Yes sure they have yet to come up with any good evidence that I know of. Yes they are clinging to a theory despite it being pretty unlikely to be true. However they aren't all idiot, if it were true then it would make several kinds of sense.
Let's not forget the other 9/11, namely the coup in Chille ochestrated by the US to overthrow a decent leader (elected too) and install a decade lasting dictatorship.
Governments do lots of bad stuff, I'm pretty sure they did not do 9/11, at least not directly. However they are still less deluded then people believing in the end times and so forth.
[–]xstaticxgpx 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
at least not directly
I think knowingly and indirectly is just as bad.
[–]Tosskey 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago
However they are still less deluded then people believing in the end times and so forth.
Bullshit. Obviously you've never encountered the Truthers who think there were holograms, and miniature nukes involved.
[–]oddSpace 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Small widely shunned minority
≠
The entire movement
The thermite shit is just as ridiculous. Random internet nerds masquerading around as structural engineers who know how a building should actually fall because they watched a few videos on YouTube.
Where are the guys that just think the government maybe had foreknowledge, or just took advantage of a travesty? Don't hear from them that often, because atleast those positions aren't so easily scoffed at.
[–]platotld 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
Oh who is the one on the internet masquerading as one who speaks truth... you!
http://www.ae911truth.org/
[–]oddSpace 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Agreed. Every claim I have seen has been refuted before, and the resources needed to correct the errors made are easily available. Yet, I still see people arguing that WTC7 fell at free-fall speed, or that it fell from fire damage alone, or that thermite can burn sideways. It's not a matter of fact, it's a matter of faith.
you don't hear from them because of the Dunning-Kruger effect and the fact that most people thinking critically gave ceased to be truthers.
[–]d3adbor3d2 -3 points-2 points-1 points 1 year ago
so the story goes: on 9/11 physics took a day off and decided to take down wtc 7 as if the bottom fell off AND on its own footprint. no plane hit it and the video of it collapsing is out there for you to see (in case you think i'm delusional and making this up). now tell me, which is a matter of faith?
if i may make an analogy, as far as religion is concerned, there are A LOT of wild claims out there. this is what brought me here to /r/atheism in the first place. an idea/belief is scrutinized and proven/dis-proven. some have all the loose ends tied up and some simply ask for an independent (re)investigation. i can't speak for everyone, but i am for the latter.
Try arguing with a career electrical engineer that he doesn't know dick about structural engineering on the scale of skyscrapers. So convinced is he that his knowledge in his field somehow magically transfers over that he claims experts in the field of structural engineering don't know what they're talking about. Seriously like ramming one's head into a brick wall.
[–]muyoso 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Not just internet nerds. That fucktard Jesse Ventura was peddling thermite paint as a potential cause of the building collapse. He was a governor. At least people can see now that its a complete asshole.
[–]d3adbor3d2 -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
people who actually grabbed samples at the site. we're the internet nerds. they're actually doing the work (thinking) for you.
[–]Anzereke 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
...seriously?
Okay get back to taking the piss, this lot be crazy too.
You know I keep trying to give people the benefit of the doubt and they keep turning out to be insane, will someone please invent an FTL drive a feel a professor farnsworth coming on.
I suppose a clever-ray would work too.
[–]ReverseLabotomy 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
The other other 9/11
See this is starting to make me go the other way now, three on te same date got to be a conspiracy! that or al Queada has a surprising sense of irony.
[–]mywifeisaninja 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Sure smart people can have idiotic opinions. But that doesn't mean we can't make fun of it. Just relax man, it's a joke.
[–]heyheymymy2011 -2 points-1 points0 points 1 year ago
Yawn. WTC 7.
[–]AKASquared 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Indulge me for a moment. Supposing there is no good reason for WTC 7 to have fallen except a deliberate demolition... wouldn't a conspiracy smart and disciplined enough to have pulled off the attacks know better than to give it all away by dropping another building with no cover story?
[–]heyheymymy2011 -4 points-3 points-2 points 1 year ago
Yawn. WTC 7. Science. Cover stories and shit are meaningless to science. Got it jack.
[–]AKASquared 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
And science knows why it fell. You're wrong. But you don't care about science, because it's technical and most people can't follow the arguments, so when you dismiss the science out of hand with some made up bullshit it sounds persuasive to you and all the other people who have the same preset conclusion as you. Kind of like global warming and evolution.
So let's talk human actions. You need to believe that the same people are super-efficient and can flawlessly create and execute a plan with hundreds of moving parts, and also incompetent bunglers.
[–]heyheymymy2011 -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
WTF you talking about? You high?
[–]platotld -6 points-5 points-4 points 1 year ago
WTC 7 bitch
[–]creakybulks 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Yeah! The government managed to crash two planes into buildings to bring them down, but when the REAL target didn't fall, they resorted to demolitions hidden in the walls that Alpha Centaurians and Israelis planted when they built the thing. Also, a heat seeking missile destroyed the Pentagon, and the people who supposedly died were simply faked by forging birth certificates and family members decades ago!
It's so simple! Wake up sheeple!
[–]platotld -8 points-7 points-6 points 1 year ago
you resort to simple mindless rhetoric, but listen WTC7 fell in under 10 seconds and no plane hit it. Physics ...... look it up.
[–]Marctetr 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
Severe damage from being right next to a falling skyscraper and being on fire, look it up.
[–]platotld -1 points0 points1 point 12 months ago
I did , I read the nist report, you did not. Your a shill, a wanker and probably so patriotic that you drink coffee out of a "America the Free" mug. There were other buildings around besides WTC7, go back to sleep.
[–]Marctetr 0 points1 point2 points 12 months ago
pffttt ahahaha. This is pretty funny to wake up to in the morning.
(Btw, the correct form is [you're], short for [you are].)
Attacking grammar as oppose to the actual assumption I make about you does little to change my perception of you're powers of deduction. Until a clear investigation, independent is done I am afraid neither of us will know the truth. I am not 100% sure of anything, other than the fact there are to many unanswered questions. take care.
[–]creakybulks 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
WTC7 very likely fell because its lower floors were heavily damaged from debris that struck the tower from the main WTC towers as they collapsed, as well as the incredibly heavy fires within that were not fought by firefighters. Provide the evidence that government collusion occurred and I will believe you.
EDIT: Mindless rhetoric? Fuck you, asshole.
[–]weforgottenuno 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
"Mindless rhetoric? Fuck you, asshole."
Yes, conspiracy theorists are often hostile when their fantasies are challenged. Same as religious folks.
[–]platotld 0 points1 point2 points 12 months ago*
Mindless yes, glad your angry. So let me get this right since you failed math. The building collasped in under 10 seconds, straight down symterically. Evidence of government collusion, ok how about the fact WTC7 was not included in the 9/11 Commion report and the NIST engineers have yet (including the goverment) offer an "offical reason" for the collaspe. If it were fallen due to debris, (debris was not evenly dispearsed throughout the area,) how could it collaspe staight down and one side falling into another area, straight down in "almost" free fall speed. Not to mention the BBC reported it had collasped 15 mintues before it actually dropped. The only question I ask that you MUST answer is how the building fell at free fall speed, near freefall. Use only logic and see how it came down. Regardless if it was GOVERNMENT, AL Q + Bin Laden, the fact is WTC7 has been completely ignored in media. Can't have it both ways ok, planes hit towers with JET FUEL weaken steel and collaspe. But this time plain old fires bring down a builind.
So yes, mindless in the fact you can see evidence right in front of you, research it yourself, but you wait for someone, or thing from some "authority" you deem good enough before you'll except facts.
WHat about this evidence :
Read the NIST REPORT : http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm
Study what is says, they say ... things like "Is it possible that thermite or thermate contributed to the collapse of WTC 7?
NIST has looked at the application and use of thermite and has determined that its use to sever columns in WTC 7 on 9/11/01 was unlikely." U N L I K E L Y, not yes or no. Read it. Question it. Now if you got the guts, look harder ..............
Beginning with the penthouse, all 47 stories of it imploded into its own footprint in less than seven seconds. Three different videos of Building 7’s vertical collapse – two from CBS video broadcasts, and one from an NBC news camera – can be seen online at http://wtc7.net/videos.html.
If you go back to the NIST report ( which is IF you read it NOT conclusive), if says one collum failed and brought down the whole thing, again in under 10 seconds. 1 ..... 2 ..... 3..... 4...... 5..... get my drift. Not long.
[–]namith 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Except Obi-Wan actually knew what he was talking about.
[–]nickateen 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
so much win in a single post...
[–]Egon88 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Took me a second to catch the double meaning.
[–]y_u_no_answer 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I feel bad for laughing at this...
[–]Flyboy_6cm 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I laughed too hard at this.
[–]Think_Floyd 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
'It was obviously a controlled demolition! Otherwise it would have fallen over like a domino! Trust me, I understand physics.'
[–]VorcePA 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
This joke is Hitlarious
[–]SuperNinKenDo 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH.
[–]inventingnothing 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
So, what you're saying... is that Obi Wan Kenobi was a specist?
this just isn't clever enough to get my vote sorry but i get what you mean, maybe the truthers are crazy, obsessive probably, but there was definitely shady shit going down. you can't convince me there is a good reason the FBI cannot show us video footage of a plane going into the pentagon.
[–]Lav1tz 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago
Perhaps because it is classified as Top Secret because it occurred on a High security military base that contains highly classified information and security parameters? This is like asking why you can't have video footage inside the CIA or on the perimeter of the building... It seems self evident to me and I think most people.
[–]ttsci 6 points7 points8 points 1 year ago
What drives me nuts about this is that they have pieces of the fucking plane recovered from the site and people still buy into the conspiracy shit. The reason it's hard to make out a plane is that these security cameras are designed to capture images of people and cars, neither of which travel at 237+ meters per second. The other problem is that these conspiracy theories have to come up with some convoluted explanation of what happened to an entire plane full of people, not to mention the plane itself. It's a ludicrous proposition no matter how you slice it.
You're right in that a lot of footage there is probably classified, but it was released under a FOIA request. The real reason people aren't satisfied is that there's no high-res photo of the plane, but you have to consider the media. These security cameras are not designed to capture hundreds or thousands of frames per second. The plane was traveling at 237m/s and the distance between the road and the Pentagon is roughly 250 feet (76 meters). The plane took eight tenths of a second to penetrate completely through 310 feet of the three outer rings. The suggestion that these kind of cameras could have possibly captured something that fast is absurd. People simply think "gee, camera, why can't we see it?" without thinking about the purpose of the cameras (pedestrians and cars) and their technological limitations.
Edit: Just want to clarify, this is addressed more at tnpreston rather than at you, Lav1tz, but I wanted to build off of your point, so I replied to you. :)
[–]badcatdog 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
"sand people" "blast points too accurate"
great joke!
[–]odintal 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
That quote was even wrong in the movie because the Tusken don't even use blasters. The typical weapon fire arm of a Tusken Raider is a Cycler Rifle.
[–]BrotherC 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5658198482624505213
just laughed so hard i fell out of bed. thank you
[–]P00P3RB0WL 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
And soon after he said this he was attacked by a half-bionic Darth Maul!
[–]shadowlands339 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
is there a correlation between 9/11 truthers and atheism? just curious.....
[–]TFGeditor -4 points-3 points-2 points 1 year ago
Truthers are just another brand of religious fanatic.
[–]The_A_Drain 9 points10 points11 points 1 year ago
Except, God? No evidence.
9/11 Conspiracy? Some (if meagre and debatable) evidence.
I don't get how people can categorically be against faith in all its forms, then in the same breath have total faith in their government...
Governments pull shady shit all the time, while I'm not going to put on a tin foil hat and dance around making shit up, I wouldn't bat an eyelid in surprise if it came out in 20 years to be true.
[–]oblivious_oblivion 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago
While I wouldn't call it an inside job, I do think the government was possibly complicit, and at the very least, it was advantageous. Of course, we will never know since Cheney's farts are classified state secrets. The media latched onto it and the God-and-Country whackjobs came out of the woodwork and anyone that disagreed was branded a traitor.
9/11/01: the day my country went full retard.
[–]havesometea1 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago
This has always been my take on the events of 9/11. Did our government plan the attacks? No. Did they know about the plans and not do anything to stop them? Yes. These fuckers had plans to invade the middle east and needed a pretext to do it. So, boom down go the towers and suddenly everyone in the government is talking about how evil Saddam is...
[–]d3adbor3d2 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
saudi hi-jackers who got orders from an afghan operative and were funded by pakistan intelligence. yep it's saddam's fault all right.
[–]Quark_LeStrange 6 points7 points8 points 1 year ago
I don't have total faith in government, but I am fairly confident that the government couldn't pull off the WTC/Pentagon attacks, with 10 years later the only "evidence" incriminating them being produced by a few people squinting at blurry photos and plugging their ears to any opposing evidence.
[–]The_A_Drain 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago
My point is that the allegations are nowhere near as far fetched as believing in god. And that there is at least a precedent set for governments pulling highly questionable shit.
[–]napoleonsolo 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
They're pretty close. To say "governments do shady stuff" is not the same as the dumb stuff truthers come up with about holographic planes and explosive charges in the WTC.
If anything Truthers are more stupid. At least religious people have a lifetime of indoctrination as an excuse.
[–]BetYouCanNotTellMe 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
What evidence?
[–]TFGeditor -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
Religion and religious devotion does not require a god.
[–]The_A_Drain 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Neither did Watergate.
[–]Shainsworth -5 points-4 points-3 points 1 year ago
Neither did "insert non-sequitur here"
[–]The_A_Drain 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
That phrase, I do not think you are applying it correctly.
But hey, people on this subreddit love that phrase, so I'm sure people will clap for you.
Point remaining though that you must occasionally question your government as they have proven again and again to be less than trustworthy, following them blindly is no better than blind devotion to a religious idol.
[–]Shainsworth 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago
ALL HAIL THE GOLDEN SPAGHETTI OBAMA!!!
Actually... That is a pretty amazing mental image.
I think I'm gonna head off into the mountains, smoke a bunch, accidentally set fire to a bush, and write a bible.
[–]JorgeChurano -13 points-12 points-11 points 1 year ago
So are atheists.
[–]nightzirk 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
wat
[–]TFGeditor 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Stupid fuck.
ATHEISM IS NOT A GODDAMNED RELIGION!!
[–]el3ctr0nika -6 points-5 points-4 points 1 year ago
Seriously? Fuck you.
[–]AtheistActivist[S] 10 points11 points12 points 1 year ago
Sorry I don't check every single subreddit before posting ass hat
[–]el3ctr0nika -3 points-2 points-1 points 1 year ago
Oh please. This was posted an hour after that one. Don't even try to bullshit us.
[–]AtheistActivist[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I saw this 2 days ago on the website "I Raff I Ruse" and decided to share it today. Don't believe me? You can go check. Or tell ya what, I'll save you the trouble. The fact that another person saw it and shared it on reddit, which is used by a few million people, is what we call a statistical probability. You, sir, can kindly go fuck yourself now.
[–]el3ctr0nika 0 points1 point2 points 12 months ago
It's of course impossible to tell whether you are lying or not and whether or not this is simply a coincidence (which I doubt anyway—you could have easily Googled that site afterwards, but I digress), but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Just use this site next time before you submit something. You're welcome.
[–]iongantas -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
Oh, is that a 'thing'? My crazy boss (not a christian) seems to think it was an inside job.
[–]JorgeChurano 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Crazy, eh?
[–]Rationalwoman -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
Truthers are morons.
[–]merz1254 -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
funny everytime, even on 4chan.
[–]TehPhantom -2 points-1 points0 points 1 year ago
I just pissed my self i laughed so hard.
[–]TruePimp -7 points-6 points-5 points 1 year ago
http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/kc64t/obiwan_is_a_truther/
[–]morris198 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
I don't subscribe to r/funny, so this was useful to me and the other 332 Redditors (as of this moment) who upvoted the submission.
[–]rwgordon -9 points-8 points-7 points 1 year ago
Downvoted this because it's a repost... and it's dumb. ಠ_ಠ
all it takes is a username and password
create account
is it really that easy? only one way to find out...
already have an account and just want to login?
login
[–]HerrBongwasser 15 points16 points17 points ago
[–]iheartbakon 18 points19 points20 points ago
[–]Blackplatypus 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]NuclearWookie 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]cypherdtraitor 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]coppersink 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]HPDerpcraft 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]josiahw 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]HPDerpcraft 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]josiahw -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]HPDerpcraft 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]NuclearWookie 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]darkangelx 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]NuclearWookie 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]darkangelx 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]weforgottenuno -4 points-3 points-2 points ago
[–]NuclearWookie 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]weforgottenuno 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]NuclearWookie 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]wahwahwildcat 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]sanjiallblue 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]wahwahwildcat 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]wahwahwildcat 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]platotld 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]mc_curtis10 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]d3adbor3d2 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]platotld 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]platotld 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]eromitlab 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]wahwahwildcat 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]creakybulks 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Kennian -5 points-4 points-3 points ago
[–]tuber[
] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]coppersink 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Anzereke 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]xstaticxgpx 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Tosskey 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]oddSpace 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]Tosskey 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]platotld 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]oddSpace 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]d3adbor3d2 -3 points-2 points-1 points ago
[–]sanjiallblue 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]muyoso 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]d3adbor3d2 -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Anzereke 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ReverseLabotomy 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Anzereke 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]mywifeisaninja 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]heyheymymy2011 -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]AKASquared 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]heyheymymy2011 -4 points-3 points-2 points ago
[–]AKASquared 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]heyheymymy2011 -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]namith 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]nickateen 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Egon88 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]y_u_no_answer 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Flyboy_6cm 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Think_Floyd 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]VorcePA 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]SuperNinKenDo 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]inventingnothing 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Lav1tz 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]ttsci 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]badcatdog 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]odintal 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]BrotherC 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]P00P3RB0WL 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]shadowlands339 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]TFGeditor -4 points-3 points-2 points ago
[–]The_A_Drain 9 points10 points11 points ago
[–]oblivious_oblivion 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]havesometea1 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]d3adbor3d2 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]Quark_LeStrange 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]The_A_Drain 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]napoleonsolo 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]BetYouCanNotTellMe 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]TFGeditor -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]The_A_Drain 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Shainsworth -5 points-4 points-3 points ago
[–]The_A_Drain 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Shainsworth 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]The_A_Drain 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]iongantas -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]JorgeChurano 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Rationalwoman -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]merz1254 -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]TehPhantom -2 points-1 points0 points ago