Atheists don't have specific images or perceptions of "god"... care to guess why? Tell me, what does nothing look like? What does nonexistence look like?

What do unicorns look like? What does professional wrestling look like? What do my four-year-old niece's imaginary friends look like? What does Vishnu look like? What does Thor look like? All those things are "nonexistent" and yet they can all be described and depicted in great detail. But to be fair, my niece's drawings of her imaginary friends don't really look like anything. My point is that there is no relationship between what something looks like and whether or not it exists.

As for the majority of believers, most believers when pressured about it claim to say god is invisible. This is the same in terms of visibility as nonexistence.

I don't know how many believers you know, but the ones I know--both Christians and other religions--have very specific ideas of what God looks like. And I know the Bible and the Qur'an are full of descriptions of God, angels, heaven, hell, etc. You're just being obtuse.

Just because you can think of other things that don't have a visible stimulus doesn't make this point "stupid". Nor is freedom, love, idea, evil, pain real THINGS. They are emotions, I'm not sure if you know this, but emotions are not objects or beings.

I hate to break it to you, but emotions are real things. As are all the things on my list of invisible real things, none of which emotions by the way. And whether or not the existence of invisible things make the point of the comic "stupid" depends entirely on what the point of the comic is, which leads us to your next item. Also, I didn't say "stupid", I said "dumb". Don't use quotes unless you're quoting.

Also, your claim to what the "argument" the comic brings up is BS. You made it up so you could have an imaginary beef with it. The main point of the comic was probably just to get a laugh.

You're partially correct, in that I'm not the author and don't really know what he or she was trying to say with this comic. Obviously humor was part of it. But I didn't make it up, I inferred it. I'm sure there are several possible meanings and maybe the author didn't really have any particular statement in mind. But if s/he wasn't trying to prove that God doesn't exist by pointing out that believers don't know what God looks like, then I have no idea what the comic means.

It would have probably been successful if you didn't take everything so seriously to the point you get a hernia looking at a picture displaying nothing.

How do you know how seriously I take anything? I'm taking you seriously right now, even though your response was kind of childish and mean, because you made some valid although I think incorrect comments about my comments and I wanted to respond. I suppose my comment history might bely a certain long-windedness about matters of religion and philosophy, but those things are important to me and I enjoy discussing them. And I get very annoyed intellectual laziness and intellectual dishonesty, both of which I think this comic displays.

The rest of your post is commonly refuted religious propaganda... spewed from perhaps not the mouth of a religious nut, but somebody who doesn't really care to understand others non-the-less. You claim Christians don't care what we think... well take this in stride, we don't really care what YOU think. Your claimed problems with this subreddit is nothing more than a reflection of your own twisted psychology. Also, please, stop reading the subreddit instead of complaining and threatening to so we don't have to listen to your incessant whining.

Religious propaganda? Doesn't really care to understand others? Twisted psychology? Incessant whining? Were you in the process of responding to some other comment and accidentally posted that here? You speak like you have some kind of magic window into my soul, but I'm afraid you're just not making any sense.