I'm really annoyed that this keeps getting recirculated. The CEO cooperated with authorities and helped to convict the primary culprit, Lee Farkas, who was sentenced to 30 years. The homeless guy, if I'm not mistaken, already had a significant criminal record, and it was first degree robbery, meaning he either had or implied he had a deadly weapon and intent to use it. There's obviously more to it, and maybe there's something that could be said for the homeless man "turning" himself in, but as is, this is grossly misrepresented and doesn't do anything to prove something about the disparity between the rich and the poor.