use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. reddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
reddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, community...
~65 users here now
"Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known". -Carl Sagan
You might also enjoy:
r/starparty
r/nasa
r/astronomy
r/cosmology
r/spaceporn
r/astrophys
r/aerospace
r/spaceflight
/r/spacemusic
/r/SpaceX
reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›
I've seen lots of graphics about the vastness of the universe, but this one will always have the biggest impact (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 year ago by whats8
[–][deleted] 71 points72 points73 points 1 year ago*
And the universe is equally "vast" in the other direction (the smallest of things)
[–]lasernut 18 points19 points20 points 1 year ago
Indeed, there's new debate about how small things can be as you're probably aware. And then there are solar flares which give a bit of the local perspective.
[–]Ralith 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
That article was a very interesting read; it's exciting to realize that we still haven't found a lower limit to the size of things.
[–]Vystril 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Maybe it's just empty space all the way down.
[–]lasernut 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Empty space > turtles.
Maybe turtles are empty space?
[–]lasernut 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Interesting conjecture.
[–]what-s_in_a_username 24 points25 points26 points 1 year ago
We're really, really, really, reaaaaally small but also really, really, reaaaaally big.
I feel so... medium sized?
[–]antipode 13 points14 points15 points 1 year ago
It's mindblowing to think about how limited our sense of scale is, just based on the things we can see/touch.
[–]what-s_in_a_username 16 points17 points18 points 1 year ago
Definitely. And the more you think about it, the more you realize absolutely everything we sense and think is incredibly skewed. Free will isn't real, matter is mostly empty, boobs are just flesh, everyone's upside down compared to someone else, air has stuff in it... and that's before you try drugs. Life is pretty much a long series of not having a clue about what's actually going on. Love it!
[–]AngryData 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
Free will is still up in debate. Although it would be weird to find out for sure that we are just meat robots.
[–]what-s_in_a_username 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
It is, I shouldn't assume it's a fact, but the more I think about it and read about it, the more I see there's really nothing there. It's really counter-intuitive to think that humans are meat robots, but why not?
I mean, just try to ask yourself where free will would come from, and then try to explain the answer with well known physical processes. Every time, you end up with nothing and you have to start over. It's like... well, there must be something, robots can't just ask themselves why they're robots! I can't believe I'm talking about free will without having it! Well... as strange as it sounds, everything you see around you can be explained without a soul or a spirit or whatever would contain free will.
It's a really interesting thought experiment, and the consequences of figuring out that maybe there's no free will are huge. I definitely encourage it.
[–]Panthios 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Well there is a lot of evidence that says we are in a causality based universe. There is very little evidence to true randomness.
If free will exists then randomness I believe would be more provable.
I think we are rational creatures. Just as there are computers deliver rational equations and answers. I think the different is we self reflect on the inevitable variables and think the outcome was something that had control when in fact if could have been just the inevitable answer that always "was".
[–]BeefPieSoup 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
You are incorrect. Randomness is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics. True, genuine, absolute randomness.
[–]Panthios -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
And yet in theory true randomness can never be proven. All you can say is to our current technology something is unpredictable. Not that something happens with out a cause. It just may appear that way.
Nope. Randomness is a fundamental part of Quantum Theory. Honestly. Read about it if you don't believe me, and here and especially here.
[–]Panthios -2 points-1 points0 points 1 year ago
I know that. But my claim is that you can never truly prove randomness exists only unpredictability to current methods of detection.
That is my point
[–]i_havent_read_it -2 points-1 points0 points 1 year ago
Our current understanding leads us to believe that randomness is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics
FTFY
[–]BeefPieSoup 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Okay, fine, but Panthios' assertion that "there is very little evidence to true randomness" is certainly incorrect, as I said. Quantum Randomness has been subject to intense scientific scrutiny for decades, precisely because it is such a counter-intuitive concept. As such, a large amount of evidence has been amassed for it.
[–]GargamelCuntSnarf -2 points-1 points0 points 1 year ago
And love is the only real thing.
love is as real I guess as any emotion, thought, or any other chemical based stimuli your mind experiences in its conscious reality.
Duh?
[–]Fastler 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Boobs may be just flesh, but they are damned nice flesh, don't you agree?
[–]what-s_in_a_username 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Oh, I agree, but it's the perception of it that's weird.
[–]RebelTactics 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Boobs are natures pillows. I can't think of anything softer and more cozy to sleep on.
[–]Vystril 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
If there's no lower limit, and no upper limit, then everyone is medium sized.
[–][deleted] 1 year ago
[deleted]
[–]whats8[S] 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
Completely irrelevant as a reply to his comment.
[–]kklafalot 24 points25 points26 points 1 year ago
A couple amateur questions about space:
Thanks in advance, awesome pic btw!
[–]KingJulien 19 points20 points21 points 1 year ago
The color is determined by how hot the star is.
[–]kklafalot 15 points16 points17 points 1 year ago
Can a smaller star be hotter than a larger one?
[–]KingJulien 15 points16 points17 points 1 year ago
Yes. Also, some of the bigger red stars are not longer burning hydrogen, which explains the color change. http://www.oneminuteastronomer.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/star-colors-.jpg
[–]IAmNotClaudius -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
I thought the colour is determined by how far a star is from the viewer?
[–]AngryData 11 points12 points13 points 1 year ago
Things redshift the farther away they are but they still come in all different colors. We can correct the redshift to see what color it actually is.
[–]IAmNotClaudius 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Oh, that is quite interesting! Thank you.
[–]aceryz 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago
I'm a layman myself, but as far as I know, the galaxy you mentioned is too big to be held by gravity alone; too great distances within it and not enough matter for a proper gravitation field. If dark matter was proved to exist, it might explain those gargantuan galaxies actually existing.
The wiki article on dark matter is lengthy, but provides more details.
(if I got it completely wrong, please someone correct me.)
[–]KingJulien 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago
I was under the impression that the opposite was true - the galaxy was too big to not have collapsed into a black hole. I don't know if this is right though, since no details were given.
[–]kklafalot 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
that actually sounds really viable, i think i read somewhere that dark matter (if it exists) is shown to make up the majority of mass in the universe. If we can't see dark matter, can it be felt?
[–]IamcJ 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
THE FORCE!
[–]aceryz 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Not with any equipment or senses we've got now, no. And it's said that dark matter constitutes 96% of "stuff" in the Universe, so... well, I feel a bit blind.
[–]kklafalot 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Is dark matter extremely dense or does it have properties that generate gravity without having mass? What is "stuff" supposed to mean?
"Stuff" is just something. A broad term for what we can see (ie. matter) and what might be there, but we can't say for sure yet (ie. dark matter). The gravity as we know it is a function of mass, so dark matter ought to have mass, I suppose. The problem is, we can't measure it directly - we can observe something that might be its effect (gravitational fields stronger than observable matter would indicate), but not the dark matter itself.
is dark matter equal to or more massive than regular matter?
There is supposedly far more dark matter than the regular matter, so consequently it would be more massive. It's difficult to say more, because we can only see the effects it has on whole galaxies; we are yet to find a way to study it on an atom-comparable scale.
[–]Ralith 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
I'd also like to know more about why the galaxy shouldn't be able to exist.
[–]aceryz 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
If you've got some spare time (and you obviously do, browsing reddit), here's first part of BBC programme on dark matter. Worth watching.
EDIT: there was a link to a playlist of all parts, so here it is. But the galaxy falling apart is mentioned right in the first part.
If you've got some spare time
Man, I dunno—
(and you obviously do, browsing reddit)
Ouch.
Anyway, thanks; will do. Is that the only major theory about it?
The only I've heard of. There is a scientist featured in the documentary who says there is no dark matter and all we need to do is update Newton's law, modifying it for some specific situations, so there's still a debate on this.
all we need to do is update Newton's law
Oh, is that all?
Man, I hope that guy makes a better argument in his publications.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I'm probably not any more knowledgeable than you are at this subject but I do know that stars vary in color due to the temperatures they burn at. Red stars burn at the lowest temperatures, and white stars burn at the highest temps, which I think was supposed to be something like 20,000-25,000 degrees (celcius?)
[–]paddywhack 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Everything you ever wanted to know about stars and their associated colours / sizes etc can be explained by the hertzsprung-russell diagram. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertzsprung%E2%80%93Russell_diagram
[–]vaelroth 18 points19 points20 points 1 year ago
My favorite is just the final image, the Hubble Deep Field. Sure, you could compare it to all the planets and things, but why? On a cosmic scale even the stars are just dust in the wind.
[–]strawcat 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago
That's what I was expecting this post to be. That photo never ceases to amaze me.
[–]MxM111 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago
I do not know why, but those pictures of galaxies are absolutely breathtaking on some fundamental psychological level. Only picture of my daughter can compete with that. Why is that?
[–]Gadget3440 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
That is so beautifully profound. I cannot help but be reminded of Dr Manhattan's eventual realisation
[–]tepkel 9 points10 points11 points 1 year ago
someone should expand on this graphic. Add continents, cities, buildings, people, insects, hairs, cells, atoms etc
[–]whats8[S] 29 points30 points31 points 1 year ago
This should be exactly what you're looking for.
[–]kiwi_goalie 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
That... blew my mind. I had to stop and shake my head when I went from smallest small to biggest big. DAMN.
[–]susanreneewa 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
I desperately want to be far smarter than I actually am as I want to understand what you just posted.
[–]MaxChaplin 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
You don't need to be smart, just educated.
[–]susanreneewa 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
I am well-educated, but I have always felt that higher math is a closed book.
Is there higher math there? Just orders of magnitude. 10n means 1 followed by n zeroes if n is 0 or greater, or -n zeroes followed by 1 if n is less than zero (with a decimal dot between the first two zeroes)
1km=103 m 1cm=10-2 m 1mm=10-3 m (0.001 m) 1nm=10-9 m (0.000000001 m)
[–]susanreneewa 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Yes, I understand what n means. However, if you're able to internalize the size differential between the Planck length and the size of an ant merely by looking at multipliers, you're smarter than I am, which is, I think, the point you're trying to get at here.
[–]MaxChaplin 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Division of powers of 10 is basically subtraction. 10m / 10n = 10m-n
[–]Trondolay 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
My mind needs to cool down from that explosion
[–]alfis26 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Damn! I spent the last couple of hours going through that... I need to lie down now.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
You know, this made me cry a little bit on the inside because I know for a fact I will not know what's out there in my lifetime.
[–][deleted] 1 year ago*
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
Nothing is impossible, nothing. The possibility of the human race though on the other hand, is so slim it doesn't even deserve a percentage.
[–]Qamata 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
Relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAVjF_7ensg&feature=feedlik
[–]FreeMoustacheRide 6 points7 points8 points 1 year ago
Have you seen a picture after that? There's this absolutely enormous web of mass and matter where each vertex holds roughly~5,000 galaxies. Apparently it's awfully similar to brain neurons.
[–]Enceladus_Salad 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
The universe is getting smarter.
[–]G3aR -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
That is completely incorrect.
[–]tamagawa 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
What is and why? Finish your thought, don't just
[–]G3aR 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
It was a direct response to the statement, "The universe is getting smaller."
You can read here, here and here how that statement is incorrect.
The statement was 'smarter', not 'smaller'. Although if our planet is anything to go by, it's probably wrong either way ;)
[–]dylock 22 points23 points24 points 1 year ago
No mater how many times I see this image I cant think of how tiny we are. I always wished I could live to a time where we could travel to those distant places. Perhaps someday we will. Until then I'll just keep watching Stargate...
[–]animorph 21 points22 points23 points 1 year ago
Stargates are limited. Try a TARDIS.
[–]FAHQRudy 9 points10 points11 points 1 year ago
I'll take both, thanks.
[–]silenti 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
That would be the greatest crossover in science fiction history.
[–]IterativeLoop 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
"Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you... the TARDISgate! It's like a TARDIS, but... we shaped it like a stargate. See?"
[–]bonesmccoy 11 points12 points13 points 1 year ago
Every single day of my life is spent wishing for this. Dont get me wrong, I like my life, but if I could trade it all to be a medical officer on the Enterprise-D, I would.
[–]AsAChemicalEngineer 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Same :(
As long as your granfather isn't Romulan.
[–]FirstDivision 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
...and they don't issue you a red shirt.
[–]Enceladus_Salad 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I like to pretend to pinch the heads off people who are far away. It makes me feel big. Try it with the sun and moon.
[–]qrpc 11 points12 points13 points 1 year ago
one small error... not all the objects in the Hubble deep field are galaxies. The objects with diffraction spikes are the stars.
[–]Siggy778 47 points48 points49 points 1 year ago
This gets posted like every week
[–]alexbarrett 33 points34 points35 points 1 year ago
I feel like I upvote it every week.
[–]holohedron 34 points35 points36 points 1 year ago
If you can't look at it and be humbled, every week for the rest of your life, something has gone very wrong.
[–]ASexualPanda 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
If you can't look at it and be humbled, every week for the rest of your life, the terrorists have won
[–]redditisforsheep -10 points-9 points-8 points 1 year ago
If you want to see this reposted every week for the rest of your life something has gone very wrong.
[–]holohedron 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
I agree. If you simply don't want to see posts on such a topic you shouldn't have to. I just press the hide button, the whole process takes about 1 second.
[–]rayne117 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
This isn't about you and me; this is for the person out there that hasn't been humbled yet. How much does it inconvenience to not click on something you disapprove of being posted?
Hell, you even went as far as going down in the comments to state your disapproval.
[–]SandRider 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Today is the first day I have ever viewed this...I've seen it posted many times and I always meant to click on it but just never bothered. I realized by the last panel my mouth was hanging open.
[–]kyzf42 24 points25 points26 points 1 year ago
Well, I must be the one who hadn't seen it yet. Thanks, OP!
[–]siggplus 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago
I've seen lots of graphics about the vastness of the universe, but this one I've seen the most.
[–]cantstopthe 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is.
[–]aantttt 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
HDF was done over ten days, not four months.
[–]FAHQRudy 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
From clears throat Wikipedia: "Placed in our Solar System, its surface would extend out past the orbit of Saturn. Light takes more than 8 hours to cross its circumference[12]. Some astronomers disagree, and think that VY Canis Majoris might be smaller: merely 600 times the size of the Sun, extending past the orbit of Mars."
[–]Spesh_Prince 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
And despite being that much bigger than the Sun (nearly 10 billion times the volume at the largest estimate), its mass is only at most 40 times that of the Sun. Which I find very odd indeed.
So...it's a bodybuilder. I used to have one of them as a friend. He was useless. Couldn't even help move a sofa. What a pointless lifestyle.
[–]gunner85 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
The real question, though, is was he any good at moving fridges?
[–]FAHQRudy 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Lemme put it this way. My wife went to his place in late February or early March to see they still had their dead, bone-dry, firehazard of a Christmas tree still up.
moving fridges ssssuuuuccccckkkksssss
Did he get tail?
[–]FAHQRudy 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
True story: he got engaged to a friend of mine (a blonde rock singer), told her they should stop having sex until the wedding. She wasn't happy about this (she was about 30 then) but figured it was worth it. Two years later they get married, have sex only once on the honeymoon, and then he basically never touched her again. He would deny her sex as punishment for not doing the dishes, laundry, etc. Yeah. She divorced his ass in less than two years. Then she went out and fucked anything with a pulse, which was equally awkward for everyone.
[–]Kamiwill 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
I like this one: The apparent size of the andromeda galaxy vs. the moon. That thing is huge! It is still 2.5 MLy away, but it is coming at us!
[–]mushpuppy 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago
And here we are with our little stupid worries.
[–]Puredeez 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
How awesome would it be if we found an earth-like planet the size of the sun.
[–]kyzf42 6 points7 points8 points 1 year ago
Wouldn't be very Earthlike then, eh. Imagine how many other variables would have to be radically different to compensate for the size. To start with, the gravity would be enormous, unless the density were cranked way way down, which would make the planet structurally weak and brittle, not to mention the effect on the magnetic field. An interesting thought exercise, but way beyond my ken.
[–]elloelloello 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
can we put this in the sidebar? This gets posted like once a week, probably more.
[–]DaMountainDwarf 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
I teared up first time I saw the deep field.
[–]KrishanuAR 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Powers of Ten
[–]polymathica 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
It takes a lot to give me literal goosebumps these days. This does it.
[–]aristideau 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
This has been bugging me for a while. Regarding that last photo of space that showed the Universe when it was 800,000 years old, does that mean if we had taken that same photo 800,00 years ago we would see nothing in that space?.
[–]We_Are_All_One 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Anyone?
[–]Annyeongbluth 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Bueller?
[–]Jemmani 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
he said when the universe was 800,000 years old. not 800,000 years ago. universe is 13,000,000,000 + so give or take 12,000,000,000
[–]subgameperfect 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Since the oldest light in the image was created 800,000 years after the beginning of the universe, the most distant/faintest pieces of that image would be invisible if you were to go back further than that point in time. However, not every single star and galaxy in that image is that old, you have to remember that we see all light from that little patch from the earliest to the most recent. So I'm sure that a small amount of the material would be missing, more would have a different appearance than in the current Hubble deep space image, and other parts of it would be relatively unchanged.
Imagine that the image is a core sample taken from ice and rock in the arctic. If you were to sample a 1cm section going down a mile, you would get a history of that piece of earth. The top-most layers would have been relatively recent sediment, the deepest would be ancient sea-bed and other rocks from millennia ago.
[–]aristideau 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Sorry, I meant only those stars that were 800,000 (or less) years old.
I suppose the point that I was trying to make is this; If we could could get a hypothetically super powerful telescope that could observe a planet's surface that say, was inhabited and that was formed 800,000 years after the big bang, would we be able to view the people moving normally in real-time?. Another way of saying this is at what point in that planets timeline would we be observing if we trained out super telescope on that planet, say 3 billion years ago?. Would it still be 800,00 years old to us as observers 3 billion years ago? or is there some kind of time dilation effect going on?.
The photons from that region of space wouldn't have reached our planet before that threshold in time. There is a dilation effect for mass moving at relativistic speed, but a massless particle/wave like a photon is able to move at relativistic speeds without experiencing time-space distortions that we, as matter, experience.
Because of this, yes, we would be able to see the people moving about on the surface if there was a technology that allowed for that resolution over extra-galactic distance (there are a ton of physical problems with that very premise, but for fun we'll ignore them.) The light coming on to us from the stars is literally a snapshot of a time passed, but, just as reality moves from one moment to another, the images emitted from the stars move forward through time as well.
[–]localhorse 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
The large galaxy pictured here contains 8 times as many stars as our Milky Way Galaxy. It is so large, it technically shouldn't exist according to current physics theories.
Could someone elaborate on this, please?
[–]macneo 6 points7 points8 points 1 year ago
They used the same image (rotated 90 degrees ccw) for both Arcturus and Betelgeuse.
[–]Bruc3w4yn3 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago
Betelgeuse
[–]Aenimatic 10 points11 points12 points 1 year ago
[–]ginandsoda 6 points7 points8 points 1 year ago
Now you've done it.
[–]DavidJMurphy 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
That's because they're the same star from different points in spacetime
[–]redditisforsheep 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago
Images like this quickly lose their meaning. The human brain is unable to compare scales of this magnitude. It works for about 6-8 frames tops.
[–]reeboo 9 points10 points11 points 1 year ago
"Nah bro. Universe is only 6 thousand years old, says it in the bible."
[–]ransom00 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
I know you are kidding, but really, it doesn't.
[–]tellu2 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
It doesn't? Where the hell do people get that idea from then?
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 1 year ago
They added up the ages from everyone in the bible and got ~6000. Therefore the world is that old... The sad part is that is 100% serious.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
Wow wtf!
[–]ransom00 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
People get this view primarily by using the information of family trees in the Bible and tracing the lineage back to Adam. It comes from several places in different books. The most notable person to constructive a chronology of the world by doing this (although he doesn't base it solely on that) was James Ussher. It was included in annotations in several popular versions of the Bible from about 1700 onwards. Becuase of this, his chronology, or at least his methodology of using the biblical ages, approximate dates using the Jewish calendar, etc., became very popular in the U.S.
As the article on him notes, even before the common acceptance of the theory of evolution as likely valid and well before the suggestion and proof of the big bang theory, theologians disputed his method and claims. They were doing this even in the eighteenth-century.
For what it's worth, youth earth creationism is a minority view within Christianity. It is so well known in popular culture because some of its proponents are quite vocal (and probably because it's fun to make fun of...). I have two degrees in theology, one from a very conservative, charismatic Christian school and the other from a moderate, mainline, nationally known university. At neither place did I find a professor who believed the earth was young, whether it was one who taught in the sciences, biblical studies, or theology.
edit: grammar
[–]iigloo 8 points9 points10 points 1 year ago
This is just a compilation av other graphics/videos. And I hate that I am now becoming totally desensitized to these graphics. The first times I saw them I was in awe. Now I don't really give a damn, which is a shame I guess...
[–]Zaph_q_p 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago
Just try and think about it more.
[–]em22new 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Please check this out in video form : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q
[–]mynameismeech 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Spaaace!
[–]SeeDerekRun 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Must stay away from existential thinking, must stay away from existential thinking... DAMN IT!
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Does anyone know if this exists in poster-size? I can probably recreate it, but if it already exists, I'd like to get it to hang on my kids' wall.
Photo is blurry. Anyone got a higher res version please?
[–]kneaders 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Hi Rez version?
[–]Grandarbiteraugustin 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago*
Could any physics genius attempt to explain something to my simple brain? Why is that large galaxy in the 28th frame too large to exist according to our physics theories?
That caught my eye too. Anyone?
[–]hidinginthebushes 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
I love how you're looking 13 billion years back in time by viewing this.
[–]The_Real_Cats_Eye 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Our combined knowledge = nothingness. Higher intelligence? HA!!! We're overgrown monkeys with less hair. We're basically still in the primordial sludge stage as a species. Now I know why our species believes in "gods".
[–]michaeltruhl 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Makes you wonder about the plausibility of wormholes as a means of aliens traveling to us, or vice versa. Even at light speed, many systems in our own galaxy are prohibitively far away, so wormholes are the key to bridging the distance.
[–]princetrunks 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
The deep space galaxies in this image aren't 13 billion light years away. The quasars/early galaxies that are roughly 11+ billion light years or so are rather red-shifted and not as clear as most of the deep space section in this photo. The newest ones we have been recently photographing are being discovered in the infrared spectrum since they are so distant, they are red shifted that far in the lower light spectrum...even beyond the impressive power of the Hubble. The recent ones we have been observing are roughly 12-13+ billion light years away..but the farthest we can observe is the CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background)...the afterglow of the Big Bang @ 13.7 billion light years away...where the electromagnetic signals are so red shifted, they are in the microwave portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. </melvin rant>
Ok, there definitely are aliens somewhere. The probability of us being the only form of life seems too small at this point.
[–]Eakere 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago
Has it been a week since the last 'Mind=blown space is big!' post? Time sure flies.
[–]KingJulien 11 points12 points13 points 1 year ago
They never really fail to interest me though.
[–]YAOMTC 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
JJ.am probably has their mark on more images than anyone else... and they're not even around anymore
[–]EmitStop 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Yeah they are, they've just changed their name to 4gifs.
Huh. I just assumed they sold the domain. Still the same people behind it?
EDIT: Now I see that they put their watermark on everything too, in the same location and style. I'm gonna guess... yes, it is the same evil bastards.
[–]VinylCyril 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
If I were the editor of that image, I would've put a different number into "over 10,000 galaxies," you know.
[–]MurasakiYugata 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
VinylCyril! What does the Hubble Telescope say about the number of galaxies in this photo?
[–]rawlyn 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I disagree. "Impact" is usually related to conciseness. This image is long-winded and complicated, so doesn't really have "impact" in my opinion.
[–]Urizen 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Yeah, this is the first time I've seen this graphic and my mind can only recoil in terror.
[–]c14941 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
I love this. But I always wonder that since we are looking back in time when we view these images perhaps the galaxies have since spread long and far apart. Also it seems like having VY Canis Majoris going super nova would lead to a shitty day in the neighbor hood.
Are those actual photographs of all of these stars, or are they just illustrations? If the former, I would like to collect these photos and put them on my hard drive; of not just these stars, but other ones.
[–]Magneson 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Far Out
[–]qoa 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
If I see that deep field image one more time...
Man, fuck you.
For me it has always been this.
[–]ddunnpsyd 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
10,000 galaxies? Time to rewrite science fiction.
[–]celfers 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
And everything visible in the deep field is only 4% of what there is. Matter is only 4% of the universe so 96% is dark energy or matter or something not in any textbook.
My mind just can't focus on the deep field and fathom it. The dark energy/matter just shuts down all thought.
Amazing, fantastic, incredible.
[–]DoccSampson 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
The part that always gets me is the second to last frame. We can literally look back in time.
[–]Rosatryne 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Well. Strictly speaking, you don't have any other option!
[–]DoccSampson 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago
Touche, sir.
[–]Lobbby 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago
Indeed, quite erm... MIND BLOWING
[–]GTbulldog -5 points-4 points-3 points 1 year ago
And to think all of this came about because some tiny particle decided to explode someday. Yeah, right.... Awesome graph.
[–]iamsmrtk -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
Since ytmnd is down/broken: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnqsN2MniF4
[–]Emleaux -1 points0 points1 point 1 year ago
Hubble gotchu!
[–]johnjonestheman -2 points-1 points0 points 1 year ago
this is what I show to people that don't believe in God...
[–]acidrocker 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago
wat?
[–]bobdolebobdole -6 points-5 points-4 points 1 year ago
Why is it that every time this gets posted it's always preceded with the cliched title: "I've seen so and so many graphics about the universe, BUT [ensuing sentiment]"? Seriously people, give the graphic(s) a rest. It means a lot more to have discovered this, or rediscovered it, after the "awe" has died down a little.
[–]danthek54 -3 points-2 points-1 points 1 year ago
FW FW FW FW FW FW
[–]GrossPig -3 points-2 points-1 points 1 year ago
If I dropped a deuce in space, where would it be on the chart?
[–]Heelincal -3 points-2 points-1 points 1 year ago
I get this in e-mails all the time... Are we no better than chain e-mails sent by grandmothers???
[–]cunt-a-woof -17 points-16 points-15 points 1 year ago
FUCK YOU CUNT
[–]stargardt -15 points-14 points-13 points 1 year ago
Meh. Back to gonewild.
all it takes is a username and password
create account
is it really that easy? only one way to find out...
already have an account and just want to login?
login
[–][deleted] 71 points72 points73 points ago*
[–]lasernut 18 points19 points20 points ago
[–]Ralith 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Vystril 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]lasernut 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Vystril 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]lasernut 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]what-s_in_a_username 24 points25 points26 points ago
[–]antipode 13 points14 points15 points ago
[–]what-s_in_a_username 16 points17 points18 points ago
[–]AngryData 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]what-s_in_a_username 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]Panthios 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]BeefPieSoup 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Panthios -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]BeefPieSoup 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Panthios -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]i_havent_read_it -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]BeefPieSoup 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]GargamelCuntSnarf -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]Panthios 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]GargamelCuntSnarf -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]Fastler 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]what-s_in_a_username 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]RebelTactics 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Vystril 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–][deleted] ago
[–]whats8[S] 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]kklafalot 24 points25 points26 points ago
[–]KingJulien 19 points20 points21 points ago
[–]kklafalot 15 points16 points17 points ago
[–]KingJulien 15 points16 points17 points ago
[–]IAmNotClaudius -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]AngryData 11 points12 points13 points ago
[–]IAmNotClaudius 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]aceryz 12 points13 points14 points ago
[–]KingJulien 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]kklafalot 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]IamcJ 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]aceryz 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]kklafalot 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]aceryz 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]kklafalot 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]aceryz 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Ralith 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]aceryz 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Ralith 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]aceryz 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Ralith 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]paddywhack 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]vaelroth 18 points19 points20 points ago
[–]strawcat 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]MxM111 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]Gadget3440 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]tepkel 9 points10 points11 points ago
[–]whats8[S] 29 points30 points31 points ago
[–]kiwi_goalie 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]susanreneewa 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]MaxChaplin 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]susanreneewa 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]MaxChaplin 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]susanreneewa 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]MaxChaplin 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Trondolay 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]alfis26 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–][deleted] ago*
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Qamata 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]FreeMoustacheRide 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]Enceladus_Salad 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]G3aR -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]tamagawa 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]G3aR 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]tamagawa 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]dylock 22 points23 points24 points ago
[–]animorph 21 points22 points23 points ago
[–]FAHQRudy 9 points10 points11 points ago
[–]silenti 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]IterativeLoop 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]bonesmccoy 11 points12 points13 points ago
[–]AsAChemicalEngineer 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]FirstDivision 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]Enceladus_Salad 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]qrpc 11 points12 points13 points ago
[–]Siggy778 47 points48 points49 points ago
[–]alexbarrett 33 points34 points35 points ago
[–]holohedron 34 points35 points36 points ago
[–]ASexualPanda 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]kyzf42 24 points25 points26 points ago
[–]siggplus 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]cantstopthe 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]aantttt 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]FAHQRudy 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]Spesh_Prince 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]FAHQRudy 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]gunner85 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]FAHQRudy 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]FAHQRudy 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Kamiwill 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]mushpuppy 3 points4 points5 points ago
[–]Puredeez 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]kyzf42 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]elloelloello 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]DaMountainDwarf 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]KrishanuAR 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]polymathica 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]aristideau 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]We_Are_All_One 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Annyeongbluth 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] ago
[–]Jemmani 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]subgameperfect 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]aristideau 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]subgameperfect 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]localhorse 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]macneo 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]Bruc3w4yn3 7 points8 points9 points ago
[–]Aenimatic 10 points11 points12 points ago
[–]ginandsoda 6 points7 points8 points ago
[–]DavidJMurphy 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]redditisforsheep 5 points6 points7 points ago
[–]reeboo 9 points10 points11 points ago
[–]ransom00 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]tellu2 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points ago
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]ransom00 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]iigloo 8 points9 points10 points ago
[–]Zaph_q_p 12 points13 points14 points ago
[–]em22new 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]mynameismeech 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]SeeDerekRun 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]kneaders 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Grandarbiteraugustin 1 point2 points3 points ago*
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]hidinginthebushes 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]The_Real_Cats_Eye 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]michaeltruhl 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]princetrunks 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Eakere 4 points5 points6 points ago
[–]KingJulien 11 points12 points13 points ago
[–]YAOMTC 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]EmitStop 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]YAOMTC 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]VinylCyril 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]MurasakiYugata 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]rawlyn 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Urizen 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]c14941 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Magneson 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]qoa 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]ddunnpsyd 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]celfers 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]DoccSampson 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]Rosatryne 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]DoccSampson 1 point2 points3 points ago
[–]Lobbby 0 points1 point2 points ago
[–]GTbulldog -5 points-4 points-3 points ago
[–]iamsmrtk -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]Emleaux -1 points0 points1 point ago
[–]johnjonestheman -2 points-1 points0 points ago
[–]acidrocker 2 points3 points4 points ago
[–]danthek54 -3 points-2 points-1 points ago
[–]GrossPig -3 points-2 points-1 points ago
[–]Heelincal -3 points-2 points-1 points ago