this post was submitted on
1,489 points (55% like it)
7,621 up votes 6,132 down votes
shortlink:

pics

subscribe2,388,253 readers

5,859 users here now

Looking for an image subreddit with minimal rules? Check out /r/images

A place to share interesting photographs and pictures. Feel free to post your own, but please read the rules first (see below), and note that we are not a catch-all for general images (of screenshots, comics, etc.)

Spoiler code

Please mark spoilers like this:
[text here](/spoiler)

Hover over to read.

Rules

  1. No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, info-graphics and most diagrams. Text (e.g. a URL) serving to credit the original author is exempt.

  2. No gore or porn. NSFW content must be tagged.

  3. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking & harassment will not be tolerated.

  4. No solicitation of votes (including "cake day" posts), posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor, or [FIXED] posts. DAE posts go in /r/DoesAnybodyElse. "Fixed" posts should be added as a comment to the original image.

  5. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to an image hosting website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

  • If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don't delete it as that just makes the filter hate you!

  • If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it!

Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichés/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning.

Links

If your post doesn't meet the above rules, consider submitting it on one of these other subreddits:

Comics  
/r/comics /r/webcomics
/r/vertical /r/f7u12
/r/ragenovels /r/AdviceAtheists
Image macros Screenshots/text
/r/lolcats /r/screenshots
/r/AdviceAnimals /r/desktops
/r/Demotivational /r/facepalm (Facebook)
/r/reactiongifs /r/DesktopDetective
Wallpaper Animals
/r/wallpaper /r/aww
/r/wallpapers /r/cats
The SFWPorn Network /r/TrollingAnimals
  /r/deadpets
  /r/birdpics
  /r/foxes
Photography Un-moderated pics
/r/photography /r/AnythingGoesPics
/r/photocritique /r/images
/r/HDR
/r/windowshots
/r/PictureChallenge
Misc New reddits
/r/misc /r/britpics
/r/gifs Imaginary Network
/r/dataisbeautiful /r/thennnow
/r/picrequests /r/SpecArt
/r/LookWhoIMet
  /r/timelinecovers
  /r/MemesIRL
  /r/OldSchoolCool
  /r/photoshopbattles

Also check out http://irc.reddit.com

a community for
to anything interesting: news article, blog entry, video, picture...
message the moderators

MODERATORS

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

1488
1489

Perfect Shot (irsen.35photo.ru)

submitted ago by Mind_Virus

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on
top 200 commentsshow all 245
sorted by:
best
best
top
new
hot
controversial
old

[–][deleted] 142 points143 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Perfect? I think not. There's a plane in the way.

[–]Rubix22 18 points19 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's not exactly in the center of the hole either.

[–]WhiZa 19 points20 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

that's what she said

[–]viralizate 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'ts a bird

[–][deleted] 101 points102 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I found the original image here: http://i.imgur.com/8RphY.jpg

Wait, there's more: http://i.imgur.com/2f6mY.jpg

[–]Dman757 31 points32 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

True Original

[–]Space-Dementia 27 points28 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I combined ours, you know, for science.

[–]aoeu00 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Now I'd watch that next Men in Black movie.

[–]Space-Dementia 27 points28 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You've got it

[–]explodingzebras 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

perfect!

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Look closer http://i.imgur.com/wucXo.jpg

[–]geist_zero 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Seems legit to me.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This one legit too ? http://i.imgur.com/pVaHJ.jpg

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's 2 legit 2 quit.

load more comments (1 reply)

    [–]houndofbaskerville 11 points12 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Say what again you photoshop wizard!!!

    [–]G3aR 3 points4 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Wow, who ever did that did a really nice job on the rotoscope.

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    No muthafuckin' snakes on that muthafuckin' plane.

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    What the hell are they doing in that shot?

    [–]Aflack246 0 points1 point ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    More like perfect shop!

    [–]shagg187 105 points106 points ago*

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    It's a 'collage' (aka a nice way of saying photoshop) according to the photographer, not not as you think. The plane did pass from there but a lot of different shots with different exposures were taken and then combined in the end with means of photoshop to get that final image.

    From the looks of it, a plane will always pass from there so photographer had all the time in the world to get it right, combining different photos of the same location with different lighting effects.

    More from the photographer here: http://tinyurl.com/3d4xltg

    Nice one, nevertheless.

    [–]rotzooi 32 points33 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    I don't particularly like clicking obfuscated/shortened URLs, so FYI, this is the full URL shagg187 posted: http://irsen.35photo.ru/photo_240335/ .

    (He added Google translate on top of that; I didn't)

    [–]meinsla 26 points27 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Try this, http://5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_y6v9og_torrentEverything

    [–]weed4thed0e 3 points4 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    aaaannnnndd his site's down.

    [–]Iamametameta 1 point2 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    Reddit strikes yet again.

    [–]oatmealsnap 1 point2 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    The site doesn't seem to be working right now, but it seems like you are describing an HDR photo. HDR isn't exactly a collage, or completely photoshopped. If this is in fact an HDR, then all they used photoshop for was to merge several photos together to get balanced color in the highlights and in the shadows.

    [–]garoorag 1 point2 points ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    I'm not sure where the technical definition of HDR stops, but when you say HDR it usually means feeding the multiple exposures to an algorithm and letting it work its (ugly, tacky) magic.

    As I understand it (and as I already assumed from looking closer at the resulting photo), the photographer didn't do that, but essentially did a manual collage of the sky+plane in a photo, and the building in another photo. It just so happens that (unless he's lying) both photos were taken from exactly the same spot, but it wouldn't make that much of a difference to the final image if they weren't.

    (Not that I'm minimizing the achievement or doubting the reality. I choose to believe that the photographer actually did capture the plane in the "skylight".)

    [–]esssential 0 points1 point ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    shit looks HDR to me

    [–]AccountClosed 0 points1 point ago

    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

    She (the photographer) said in the comments that she took photo of upper floors and the plane at the same time, but lower floors were too dark, so she has taken additional photos and combined.

    load more comments (1 reply)

      [–]ikkake 64 points65 points ago

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Actually, plane is a bit too far towards top right corner..

      [–]Psycho-Designs 33 points34 points ago

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Fixed!

      [–]Space-Dementia 45 points46 points ago

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Fixed!

      [–]jgroome 2 points3 points ago

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Once again, I see your username. And once again, I want to listen to Origin of Symmetry.

      [–]Space-Dementia 2 points3 points ago

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Do it :)

      [–]ikkake 4 points5 points ago

      sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

      Still a bit too far left.

      load more comments (1 reply)

        [–]Purple_Herman 285 points286 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        perfect shop

        [–]autocorrector 81 points82 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Ah, the detrimental effects of technology on our sense of wonder.

        [–]allidoislietoyou 10 points11 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        OP is wrong. This was actually done using Paint.NET.

        [–]alreadytakenusername 11 points12 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        If it's done with Paint.NET, it is a wonder.

        [–][deleted] ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        [deleted]

        [–]SpartaWillBurn 2 points3 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        I can tell he used paint.net because of the pixels.

        [–]explodingzebras 0 points1 point ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        GIMP!

        [–]Fosnez 18 points19 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Seems legit to me?

        [–]frogsofwar 59 points60 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Forensic error analysis?

        this : http://i.imgur.com/qMcyF.jpg and this : http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/2be727f/ and this : http://i.imgur.com/sIHE4.jpg and this : http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/f9b4d90/

        unless you read in the Matrix, how do you read result to declare it's legit?

        edit : i'm not saying the photo is shopped, I'm just questioning the analysis. I've butchered many, many photos and forensic-ed them, yet it always "seems legit". From the beginning I think this site is just a toy for trolls.

        [–][deleted] 28 points29 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        The error level analysis only works if the image is comprised of two or more different source images which had significanlty different level of compression or resolution.

        Any shop which is hard to tell is a shop by eye is likely to pass error level analysis too.

        [–]frogsofwar 29 points30 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/b8bbdbe/

        Two shitty jpegs stuck together really quick. Yet the analysis says... what? Can you read it and make some deductions now?

        The FELA site has been used here to show how much pics have been edited, most of the pics taken in example were beauty pics of some models, not at all pics made of several images. I've read many times how the program is supposed to work, but still, I can't tell what it's supposed to show.

        [–][deleted] 10 points11 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Yeah, I agree, it's not a useful tool to detect if an image has been manipulated; I've only seen it work with screamingly obvious shops.

        [–]frogsofwar 11 points12 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        And on your example, the FELA doesn't who the image has been manipulated. It only shows that there are different brightness values in the image. You find the exact same pattern on Jackson than on the shopped head. http://i.imgur.com/IAeaG.jpg

        [–]TechnoL33T 11 points12 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        This is the kind of thread I wish I could see more often on reddit. Rather than making puns, or bitching at each-other, you guys are discussing things in a manner that adults "should."

        [–]Lazylion2 12 points13 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        plane and simple.

        [–]char0lastra 1 point2 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        Nooo

        [–]Entropius 4 points5 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        It has to do specifically with the color red.

        [–]vishnufrijoles 0 points1 point ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        If you read the explanation it says that red hues appear brighter. That explains why parts of Jackson's clothing appear that way.

        [–]brettrosey 2 points3 points ago

        sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

        It sounds like this website is just as accurate as the human eye.

        load more comments (2 replies)

          [–]Slowlearner 4 points5 points ago

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          That's a great shot, far better than the OP - you must be either very patient or very lucky!

          [–]frogsofwar 1 point2 points ago

          sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

          I actually was trying to get some 3G bars and accidentally fired the camera... it miss the "Sent from my iPhone" thing.

          load more comments (2 replies)

            [–]garoorag 0 points1 point ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            I've wondered every time it was mentioned on Reddit, because it made no sense to me.

            So what you're saying is that the only case it can actually work is if someone used jpegs from Google Image as source material for a composite shot? And most of its uses on Reddit are wrong? That does make more sense.

            [–]frogsofwar 1 point2 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            But if you check all the examples above, you'll see that even this does not make any sense.

            We should request the guy who wrote this program to do an IAMA

            [–]garoorag 0 points1 point ago*

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            I think it does. If I understand it correctly now, you're not supposed to look at how bright the colors are or whatever: you're supposed to check out what the patterns look like on comparable areas of the image.

            See the outline of the plane, and the areas where the building receives average lighting: they look the same in the analysis, which should mean that they both come from comparable sources (i.e. the guy didn't go on Google Images to find a plane). If you have a full-resolution image, maybe you could even tell if they come from the same camera.

            Although that's not at all what the site's explanation says. But I'm just gonna decide that they don't know what their own algorithm measures. It can happen.

            Never mind, I just saw your example. (Somehow I just thought people were jokingly referring to the original plane as a Spitfire.) Yeah, well, I'll just go with "this thing is bull and I damn well hope it doesn't end up in courtrooms."

            [–]ThatsItGuysShowsOver 5 points6 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            Time to do some analysis on the site tool.

            [–]teewuane 0 points1 point ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            Thank you, Bones.

            [–]teewuane 0 points1 point ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            Thank you, Bones.

            [–]the_unknown_me 0 points1 point ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            Did you use similar images search via Google?

            [–]frogsofwar 0 points1 point ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            no I quickly made these to test on the analysis website (using planes rom goog images)

            [–]cbraga 6 points7 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            all that says is it wasn't made from a couple of shitty jpegs

            [–]brainflakes 4 points5 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            You can't rely on error level testing, another good test is the direction of light sources, and this also looks legit.

            [–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            I've been looking for that site, thanks braski.

            [–][deleted] 3 points4 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            The shutter speed makes me think the picture is two parts: the sky/plane, and the building. The 1/3200 or whatever really-fast shutter speed used to freeze the plane couldn't have captured the building looking as lit as it does.

            I guess it could be that the building is getting a metric ton of sun though... it could be legit. I'm thinking not, but there's a chance it is.

            [–]natbythefoot 1 point2 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            I was also searching for this site. Thanks.

            [–]esssential 1 point2 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            Clearly it's shot at a very low aperture, if this was taken in one shot the plane would be a complete blur as the shutter speed would need to compensate for the aperture. Also, the building and sky/plane are clearly shot at 2 different exposures, if not more.

            [–]LinksUncle 4 points5 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            actually, it's just that his camera has the ability to capture the space-time continuum so that there are no fuzzy pics of moving objects. especially objects moving at the speed of an airplane that fly provocatively close to buildings.

            [–]BrowsOfSteel 9 points10 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            Shutter speeds: how do they work?

            [–]instant_street 3 points4 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            To be fair, the planes probably pass there at fixed times, so it shouldn't be too hard to manage a shot like this one.

            [–]explodingzebras 1 point2 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            exactly and if you take multiple shots one is bound to get it just on, an you could spend a whole day just getting it right

            [–]OopsLostPassword 1 point2 points ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            Probably, but how can you "prove" it from the image ?

            [–]billybaldwinme 0 points1 point ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            This model plane does not fly here

            [–]wartexmaul 0 points1 point ago

            sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

            The Sharpen is strong with this one.

            load more comments (4 replies)

              [–]pels 10 points11 points ago

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              HB-JZL EasyJet

              http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=HB-JZL&distinct_entry=true

              [–]Munkyspyder 3 points4 points ago

              sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

              EasyJet Switzerland please :)

              load more comments (4 replies)

                [–][deleted] ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                [deleted]

                [–]the_bossman 1 point2 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Came here to say the same thing.

                [–]beefsack 7 points8 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                We must go deeper

                [–]DogXe 11 points12 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                I took a picture the other day ...so this had to be done!

                [–]scoops22 0 points1 point ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                looks legit

                [–]fotografio79 4 points5 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                That's levitation Holmes.

                [–]houndofbaskerville 0 points1 point ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                I disagree.

                [–]angrypoodle 11 points12 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Don't know why everyone claims this is shopped... Planes take off over the same paths everyday. If indeed the path intersected this building perfectly, there would be plenty of opportunities for this shot everyday.

                I guess it's just the default internet's reaction to unusual photographs.

                [–]hogiewan 5 points6 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/hhyjb/perfect_shot/c1vjj42

                the claims are correct

                [–]ComeUpon 1 point2 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                With all due respect, all digital photographs are "shopped" in some way. From these comments, it sounds like the dynamic range of the scene being photographed was too large for the sensor of the camera being used, so the photographer had to use multiple exposures to create the image that you're seeing. This is just a very common and perfectly legitimate way of increasing dynamic range in a scene beyond the capabilities of the camera's sensor, so "shopped" doesn't seem like the appropriate term to use. Now, if the photographer had only taken an image of the building and then added a random image of an airplane from Google images, I would be prepared to call it shopped. But that's just not the case here.

                [–]hogiewan 0 points1 point ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                most photography IS 'shopped, but that doesn't mean that you can claim it "not'shopped" just because everyone else is doing it. It does make "as captured" a more rare and interesting thing.

                [–]Stockholm_Syndrome 3 points4 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                It is shopped. Cameras can't record that wide of dynamic range. Either the building will be too dark or the sky (and subsequently the plane) will be blown out and rendered as just white.

                [–]stumblejack 1 point2 points ago

                sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                Look how close the plane is. If the image is real, the plane is taking off or landing. Either way, the building is close to an airport, and there would be many opportunities for shots like this.

                Not impressed.

                load more comments (1 reply)

                  [–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  Fire!!

                  [–]Obj_solid 0 points1 point ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  Is it bad that this was the first thing I though this was talking about?

                  [–]skepnaden 3 points4 points ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  Amazing shot that inevitably awakens some skepticism. If anyone can prove it's been shopped (lighting looks ok to me), please do. Until then I'm naive enough to believe it's real.

                  [–]diskomo 7 points8 points ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  It's from Naples, and if I understand the comments on this page correctly it is composed of more than one exposure, but the exposure of top floors and the plane is real.

                  [–]adobiqt 1 point2 points ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  It can easily be real due to consistent landing/takeoff routes. Then again it can easily be shopped. We'll never know. It's a good job whether fake or not!

                  [–]wonderdolkje 0 points1 point ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  i can tell by the pixels it is...

                  [–]Stockholm_Syndrome 0 points1 point ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  the lighting is basically proof that it's shopped in some way. Cameras just don't have that sort of dynamic range. Either the building will be too dark or the sky (and subsequently the plane) will be blown out and rendered as just white.

                  [–]AccountClosed 0 points1 point ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  Photographer said that upper building floors and the plane were taken in one shot and lower floors in another shot, specifically to correct dark lighting that she didn't like.

                  [–]AccountClosed 0 points1 point ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  Photographer said that upper building floors and the plane were taken in one shot and lower floors in another shot, specifically to correct dark lighting that she didn't like.

                  [–]CokeHeadRob 0 points1 point ago

                  sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                  Might just be me but I think it's 'shopped. Everything has a black outline. That's not normal.

                  load more comments (4 replies)

                    [–]-Contrast- 7 points8 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    ಠ

                    ರ

                    L O S T

                    [–]andeh89 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Exactly what I first thought of, but your clever pictorial made it more real. Now the grieving wounds have been re-opened ಥ_ಥ

                    [–]jezebelhussy 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Look at that fine architecture. The dharma initiative has really stepped up.

                    [–]okamiueru 8 points9 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    This one was even harder to time correctly.

                    [–]len69 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Milano?

                    [–]Shayde098 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    This is like pokemon snap. But with planes.

                    [–]cnk 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Inside job

                    [–]GunnerMcGrath 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Don't forget, cameras can take continuous shots very quickly. The impressive part of this photo is not that he was able to catch the plane in full view, but rather that he found the place to take a photo like this in the first place and spend the time to do so.

                    [–]d07c0m 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Normally anything with the caption "perfect shot" with a .ru at the end of the URL is pornographic in nature.

                    [–]pcct 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Gotte love the acoustics there when planes are flying by. The vibrations.. oh the vibrations..

                    [–]PuP5 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    plane that low means it's on approach or take off, which means that's a common sight up that apartment complex.

                    still a nice shot.

                    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Perfect shot at the plane?

                    TERRORIST ಠ_ಠ

                    [–]sushi_lover 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    looks like Barcelona...but can't tell.

                    [–]sumdog 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    If it's real, that's gotta be an awful place to live

                    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Would be a bitch living tbere

                    [–]Deenus 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    LOST

                    [–]endofanera 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Hey man nice shot, good shot man.

                    [–]ohmyshit 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    DAE feel like they'd be extremely claustrophobic inbetween those buildings? I'm really not even that bad.. but just looking at that picture made me feel trapped.

                    [–]Solkre 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Yep. ohmyshit, I think we have issues.

                    [–]ravewickly 1 point2 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Circlejerk

                    The airplane is a little off center of the buildings and should be in the middle of the hole.

                    Just joking great PHOTO!

                    [–]brainflakes 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Great shot, but probably not all that hard to get. By the height of the plane it's either coming in to land or just taking off so it's likely that many planes will cross over the same point as they are lined up to the runway.

                    [–]iupetre 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Where is this? I could swear I was in a hotel like this in Rome.

                    [–]zombie_osama 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    The buildings really remind me of Borderlands for some reason, I think it's the lighting.

                    [–]Bst1337 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    CALL THE COPS! Unsharpen mask has been raped!

                    [–]Falldog 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Anyone getting tired of Mind_Virus constantly posting photos without any source or accompanying information?

                    [–]racoonrick 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Photo unibomber

                    [–]Carpaltunnelsnake 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Yeah, they'll never be able to figure out where the RPG came from.

                    [–]gobliin 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    This was obviously shot in a higher resolution and later scaled down. The diagonal lines look kinda courious. They are a little jaggy and not blurry, like they typically are. They look a little bit like the diagonal lines in old Lucas Arts adventures.

                    I kinda like the effect. It would be cool to find out which program was used. But probably it's a simple nearest match filter with no interpolation...

                    [–]garoorag 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Nah, as Bst1337 posted in another comment, that's clearly recognizable as abuse of a sharpening filter. (I know because I used to ruin my photos like this.)

                    [–]pizzaplate 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    I am going with shopped.

                    [–]geekamongus 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Holyfuckingshit now the terrorists are just dropping planes on top of buildings instead of flying them into the sides?!?

                    [–]Earth_Citizen 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    It's a Vampire Jet (no reflections in the windows).

                    [–]fjonk 2 points3 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Not even close..

                    [–]Earth_Citizen 4 points5 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Umm, well..., uh, I, I was actually referring to this picture.

                    [–]S0ERJ0 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Bull's eye!!!

                    [–]harimaginko 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    perfect photoshop?

                    [–]philkav 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Reminds me of a building in GTA Liberty City that I always try to land my helicopter in

                    [–]Purpledrelib 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Upskirt.

                    [–]AxisFlip 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    could use some sharpening

                    [–]stevenmc 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Hover-plane!

                    [–]Caulfield_Holden 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    This feels like an upskirt shot.

                    [–]drummer_86 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    It's off center.

                    [–]niggersonmyfrontlawn 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    mediocre shoop

                    [–]RTLemur89 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    there is some place like this in Berlin but then I noticed the architecture is probably not the same style..

                    [–]Osirius44 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    This looks like it was taken in Austin, as those buildings look exactly like the Jefferson building I used to stay in while I visited up there. Freaky.

                    [–]koredom 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    EasyJet

                    [–]stumblejack 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Why do so many people assume this was shopped? The jet isn't at a high altitude, so it is either taking off or landing. In both cases, the building would have to be near an airport, and the photographer would have many opportunities to take this shot.

                    [–]Stockholm_Syndrome 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    cameras don't have that kind of dynamic range.

                    [–]strikeMang 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    It's a little off center

                    [–]valzero 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    ... but can you hit it with an RPG? :P

                    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    wow - good catch

                    [–]dburdsal 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Ahh, the voyeur hotel! What a view each room has...

                    [–]handpanda 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Looks a little off center to me..

                    [–]miiiiiiiik 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    building hotels on the runway is asking for it

                    [–]superjojo29 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    anyone care to guess the airline? my money's on virgin air

                    [–]iatedershrooms 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    AZIZ LIGHT!

                    [–]MarcinTustin 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Oh f-k yes.

                    [–]srd178 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    This is just plane silly.

                    [–]WantaHeadcrab 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Whoa! You've managed to capture the buildings! Those are rare!

                    [–]spongyiq 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    I thought shot meant perfect rpg shot...

                    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    That made me dizzy but what a cool shot.

                    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Ah yes, Obama's new VTOL Airforce One.

                    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    I think you forgot someone

                    [–]crayolam 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    I want to upvote this picture so bad but when I had the opportunity, the picture had 1337 upvotes.

                    [–]detroitwilly 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    fake

                    [–]Greebs 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Mos Eisley. That's all.

                    [–]tordenflesk[!] 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    I say: Hey man, Nice shot!

                    [–]crsj 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Is that an easy-jet?

                    [–]sirkloda 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Planes don't just randomly fly over houses. There must be a flight route, therefore there must be like 1000 planes passing every day. It could be even harder to get a shot without a plane, but you know that.

                    [–]Otaconbr 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    And on top of the the plane capture, the building just looks awesomely cell shaded. Never seen an effect like that before.

                    Cool ass photo bro.

                    [–]korthrun 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Awesome shot. Gorgeous shot. A shot worth an upvote (shop or not). Not perfect.

                    A perfect shot would have seen the plane in the direct center, tip to tip, so that the spaces around it were symmetrical.

                    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    inside a shark, inside a wave, reflecting in norwegian bubble? please?

                    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Perfect Shop

                    FTFY

                    [–]alexstefan1 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    great

                    [–]laerrus 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    How can anyone say they got the perfect shot anymore with digital movies all it takes is a freeze frame.

                    [–]jun2san 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Damn, I don't have any photoshop skills, but if I did I would so shop the inside of the millenium falcon at the front.

                    [–]richd506 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Wait how did the plane get trapped inside of there? Must be a really bad pilot!

                    [–]richd506 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Wait how did the plane manage to get trapped inside of there? Must be a really bad pilot!

                    [–]lambofield 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    No shot is perfect.

                    [–]Iamkraze 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Crazy loud if this happens everyday.

                    [–]paladin87 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Relevant

                    [–]RadicalEwok 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    nailed it

                    [–]ciurana 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    L O S T

                    [–]dubstepViking 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    well, wouldn't a plane flying that low have its landing gear out?

                    [–]thetobester 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    sleuthers gonna sleuth

                    [–]ellioy 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Or: the wings have stalled, not producing any lift; falling straight to the ground!

                    [–]afry12 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    That shot is so beast.That might not be real?

                    [–]The_Repo_Man 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Now just hope the care package wont land of the roof

                    [–]Karma_Coma 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    perfect_shot.psd ;)

                    [–]negkarmafarmer 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Kowloon City.

                    [–]AnAge_OldProb 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Perfect Shot

                    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    now its perfect.

                    [–]PHETZ 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    Perfect? <center>Plane</center>

                    FTFY.

                    [–][deleted] ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    [deleted]

                    [–]keozen 2 points3 points ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    mirror

                    [–]therealdjbc 0 points1 point ago

                    sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

                    perfect shop?

                    load more comments (16 replies)

                      Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. © 2012 reddit inc. All rights reserved.

                      REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.

                      π Rendered by PID 6078 on app-02 running 6bc9a40.