this post was submitted on
923 points (55% like it)
4,813 up votes 3,890 down votes

funny

subscribe2,394,443 readers

5,658 users here now

PLEASE, No posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor. Click for an Example.


Welcome to r/Funny:

You may only post if you are funny.

Please No:

  • Screenshots of reddit comment threads. Post a link with context to /r/bestof or /r/defaultgems if from a default subreddit instead.

  • Posts for the specific point of it being your reddit birthday.

  • Politics - This includes the 2012 Presidential candidates or bills in congress.

  • Rage comics - Go to /fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu instead.

  • Memes - Go to /r/AdviceAnimals or /r/Memes instead.

  • Demotivational posters - Go to /r/Demotivational instead.

  • Pictures of just text - Make a self post instead.

  • DAE posts - Go to /r/doesanybodyelse

  • eCards - the poll result was 55.02% in favor of removal. Please submit eCards to /r/ecards

  • URL shorteners - No link shorteners (or HugeURL) in either post links or comments. They will be deleted regardless of intent.

Rehosted webcomics will be removed. Please submit a link to the original comic's site and preferably an imgur link in the comments. Do not post a link to the comic image, it must be linked to the page of the comic. (*) (*)

Need more? Check out:

Still need more? See Reddit's best / worst and offensive joke collections (warning: some of those jokes are offensive / nsfw!).


Please DO NOT post personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder.


If your submission appears to be banned, please don't just delete it as that makes the filter hate you! Instead please send us a message with a link to the post. We'll unban it and it should get better. Please allow 10 minutes for the post to appear before messaging moderators


The moderators of /r/funny reserve the right to moderate posts and comments at their discretion, with regard to their perception of the suitability of said posts and comments for this subreddit. Thank you for your understanding.


CSS - BritishEnglishPolice ©2011

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 374

[–]A10050 234 points235 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I lost it at the Spanish inquisition one. I wasn't expecting it.

[–]haltedconfusion 67 points68 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Early reports indiciate chief weapons are "surprise and fear"

[–]gyrferret 19 points20 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

They key to victory is the element of surprise...... Surprise!

-Zap Branigan

[–]volt_ron 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And also hitting the enemy with wave after wave of your men.

[–]xicer 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes, if we hit that bullseye the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.

[–]cooper_spk 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You'll be negotiating with the balls mysterious leaders, the Brain Balls. They've got a lot of brains, and they've got a lot of chutzpah...

[–]gyrferret 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Too many body bags and ball sacks......

[–]mihello 26 points27 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope!

[–]A10050 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And nice red uniforms

[–]mihello 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surpr.... I'll come in again.

[–]swnerd 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]unussapiens 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just make sure that all the stuff us up one end.

[–]FinnishFuturist 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fetch.... the comfy chair!!

[–]ElephantPlopInDC 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The reference to the Spanish inquisition is hilarious, but the overall issue is as serious as anything can be. For a few decades now, Fox "news" has had a dramatic effect on U.S. politics, helping elect a vast number of right wing politicians and spreading a long list of lies.

Here are some examples that I hope others will help to make people aware of. (Just copy and re-post anywhere that seems appropriate.)

Direct quote from a Fox "news" insider: "We Were a Stalin-esque Mouthpiece for Bush"

http://www.alternet.org/story/149879/%22we_were_a_stalin-esque_mouthpiece_for_bush%22_--_fox_news_insider


Fox targets two New York Times reporters, altering their faces by blackening their eyes, yellowing their teeth, and making a nose larger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCQ4gAAVW2k&feature=player_embedded


Fox Repeatedly Misidentifies Republicans as Being Democrats, Often During Erupting Scandals:

http://intershame.com/on/Fox_News/?d=123

And, here are some specific examples:

Fox Repeatedly Misidentified Mark Foley (R-FL) As Being A Democrat Rather Than A Republican

http://mediamatters.org/research/200610130010

Fox Mislabels Mark Sanford (R-SC) As A Democrat After He Admits Adulterous Affair

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/24/fox-news-identifies-sanfo_n_220377.html

Fox "News" Wrongly Identifies Independent Joe Lieberman As A Democrat

http://mediamatters.org/research/200706120006

Fox Misidentifies John McCain as a Democrat http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/08/mistake-fox-news-identifi_n_85656.html

Fox "News" Mislabels Lincoln Chafee (R-RI) As A Democrat

http://crooksandliars.com/2006/10/09/fox-news-mis-labels-chafee-as-a-democrat


According to conservative Tucker Carlson, the reason Fox's slogan ("fair and balanced") was chosen is "to drive liberals crazy" [excerpt from book by Sen. Al Franken, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them..."]

http://books.google.com/books?id=igqMIP7OjrAC&pg=PA66&lpg=PA66&dq=fox+slogan+%22fair+and+balanced%22+drive+liberals+crazy+ailes&source=bl&ots=AtjQHQL-Ts&sig=83NS04Mmaw0XkQ3AcLQ5_DrMl4Y&hl=en&ei=imubTZqeBKbJ0QHAmcy7Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1


During ten months in 2010, about $40 million worth of free air time given by Fox "News" to potential Republican candidates who were hosts or "contributors" to Fox programs

http://mediamatters.org/research/201011180031


Fox parent company donates $1 million to Republican Governors Assn.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0810/Fox_parent_gives_1_million_to_RGA.html


Additional analysis from FAIR: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1067

[–]CardinalXimenez 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'll come in again...

[–]OGB 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ha, it said the same thing when I read it!

[–]jahallah 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What a show!

[–]CynicalTyler 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hey Torquemada, whaddya say?

[–]tovarish22 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I just got back from an auto-da-fe

[–]captainAwesomePants 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

auto-da-fe? What's an auto-da-fe?

[–]tovarish22 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's what you oughtn't to do but you do anyway

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You can't expect that!

[–]fireinthesky7 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Absolutely made my day. Brilliantly done.

[–]mcas1208 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Noone expects the Spanish Inquisition..>)

[–]Kurzad 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Came here for this and was not disappointed.

[–]mcas1208 -5 points-4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Crap, whats with all the downvotes...noones ever heard of Monty Python?

[–]terriblehuman 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

you flubbed the line

[–]ryansullivan 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

on what?

[–]kcg5 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

!00& I came to comment only to ask how I would crop that one shot out of all of them... Anyone know? ALL I WANT IS PYTHON

[–]Norva 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Cardinal, The Rack!

[–]HonorAmongSteves 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]HMS_Pathicus 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Nobody is.

[–]bsonk 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

no one does.

[–]robovamp 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

i think we all got "spanish inquisition'd" there

[–]Highway62 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I can't believe you set up that joke perfectly and the top reply wasn't Monty Python. Bad times.

[–]AlphaRedditor 79 points80 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Up next, our Fox News poll: should there be a government takeover of our water fountains, or is segregation what our founding fathers intended?

[–]dediobst 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Don't forget "should the government be allowed to molest smal business owner's right to independent business strategy. They had seperste facilities in the bible. What happened to capitalism?"

[–]ransomdenton 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In a special report we go to our science correspondent Shaman Og to talk about the obviously evil implications of this invention "the wheel" and how it is just a tool to destabilize the meeting around the fire.

[–][deleted] 109 points110 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The Lincoln-slavery one did me in. Bill is so smarmy in those segments.

[–]dont_upvote_this 8 points9 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Although obviously meant to be funny, that one brings up a valid point about slavery that people don't often like to think about. Many Northerners at this time liked to think that they were anti-slavery but in fact the extensive northern textile industry was heavily dependent on the South for cheap, slave-produced cotton.

In other words, many Northerners did, in fact, preach about the barbaric South while they were fattening their pockets from Southern cotton. That doesn't make slavery right or "essential," but it does cast a fair bit of hypocrisy on the North.

I am not at all defending slavery or the South. It just seems like people tend to think that the Northerners were the righteous defenders of liberty when in fact the Northern economy was quite reliant on slavery.

[–]foxp3 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Where do you think those Nikes that you're wearing come from? Or that lettuce you're eating?

[–]seeasea 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

i dont know why you were being downvoted. this is absolutely true, and we should not forget it.

we can argue the ethics of labor conditions in third world countries atc. but the truth of the matter is that many of our products come from factories with slave like conditions

[–]LibertyShoe 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

In many cases it is actually worse than the average slaves working conditions.

[–]yellowstone10 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Let's not confuse slavery with sweatshops. As poor as the working conditions in sweatshops are, the workers there choose those jobs because they have a better compensation-to-labor ratio than other jobs available to them. Slaves had no such choice available - it was work or be killed.

[–]whiskeytango 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The lettuce i am eating comes from my backyard. I dont wear nikes because i hate wearing any type of shoes. I usually go barefoot unless i am in a meeting at work.

[–]good_one_dude 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thank you, good sir, for having the guts to make this comment....

[–]hivoltage815 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Many Northerners at this time liked to think that they were anti-slavery but in fact the extensive northern textile industry was heavily dependent on the South for cheap, slave-produced cotton.

Reminds me of the dynamic between the Eloi and and Morlocks in H.G. Wells - Time Machine. That is why that is a fantastic commentary on how the world works from multiple points of view.

[–]thedesolateone 15 points16 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While this is somewhat unrelated: I don't think that evidence points to Lincoln's being consistently or wholeheartedly anti-slavery or in any sense not a racist. It seems more reasonable that the Civil War was fought to preserve the Union, and not end slavery, whatever its results.

[–]MassiveBasset 51 points52 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

On Aug. 22, 1862, President Lincoln wrote a letter to the New York Tribune that included the following passage: "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that. What I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union."

However, Lincoln's own anti-slavery sentiment was widely known at the time. In the same letter, he went on: "I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free." A month later, Lincoln combined official duty and private wish in his preliminary Emancipation Proclamation.

I think that pretty clearly states that Lincoln was personally against slavery, but professionally for keeping the union together, whatever that entailed. The Civil War, make no mistake, was fought over slavery.

Source

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes. This is what made Lincoln our greatest President. He was capable of putting the integrity of the country and the constitution above his own moral beliefs, in a time of war when everyone else was doing the opposite.

[–]McMD90 17 points18 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is what made Lincoln our greatest President

I'm not going to say Lincoln was a bad president, but saying he was the greatest may be an overshoot.

Remember, Lincoln did suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus, and then ignored the Chief Justice when he told Lincoln he could not do this. This sort of puts his views on the integrity of the Constitution in question.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fair enough, I shouldn't have gone with the superlative. In my own defense, most rankings of US presidents that I have seen have him listed as #1.

[–]DrUngood 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Lincoln also started a mandatory draft with execution as a punishment for desertion. He was the first president to approve of "total war" - which called for not only killing Confederate soldiers, but also stifling economies, starving villages, and sometimes explicitly killing women and children.

[–]packetguy 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Actually, Lincoln ignored the constitution pretty much anytime it went against what he wanted to do. He was a great President no doubt, but you are wrong to claim that he put the constitution over his moral beliefs, he did not.

[–]Wibbles 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Your quote right there seems to strongly suggest that Lincoln did not believe the war was fought over slavery, but that the abolishment of slavery was necessary to win.

[–]MassiveBasset 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I dont think that quote suggests any of those things. The civil war was, in Lincoln's view, to maintain the Union. He suggests that any course of action regarding slavery he would perform, if it meant preserving the Union.

However, the reason the Union was in jeopardy was disagreement over slavery, above and beyond anything else without any near competition. If you read the entire source article, my second sentance really had more to do with the source material (mainly point 1) than that specific quote. I agree my formatting was, and remains, poor.

[–]Martel_the_Hammer 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I agree, however it must be noted that slavery was a large part of the situation and had it not been for slavery, the U.S. would probably not look the way it does today.

[–]pintomp3 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While the North didn't fight specifically to ban slavery, the South fought specifically to keep it.

[–]madscientist777 19 points20 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Slavery was at the very core of what the civil war was fought over, and people should never forget that. The union was breaking up due to secession over slavery, especially due to the fugitive slave act.

The northern free states were fiercely anti-slavery and regarded the southern slave states as barbaric and uncivilized. The southern states regarded the free states as liberal elitists trying to use the federal government to dictate equal rights (considered an insult to southern culture at the time).

You can't really brush over the issue of slavery when discussing the civil war. Some people have tried to say it was merely a state's rights issue or a union issue, but they are simply trying to whitewash history and turn it into a fuzzy, gray moral area where it was very black and white. Sure, there were other issues at stake, but the slavery debate consumed the nation for those years.

[–]ylca 32 points33 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

. The southern states regarded the free states as liberal elitists trying to use the federal government to dictate equal rights.

Guess some things never change.

[–]stillalone 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it

[–]AFakeName 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hell, even those who do remember seem to repeat it.

[–]Emmo213 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While slavery was the main factor in the Civil War not all free states were "fiercely anti-slavery". Infact I'd say the majority of people didn't really care either way.

[–]WardenclyffeTower 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And not all people from southern states were pro-slavery. I tire of having to take up for my state, especially since my parents weren't even born in this country. The Civil War isn't black & white; all southern states and their citizens weren't pro-slavery, evil people. It disgusts me that it is okay to be bigoted about the south. From the wikipedia article North Carolina in the American Civil War, Early war years:

North Carolina was a picture of contrasts. In the Coastal Plain, it was a plantation state with a long history of slavery. However, there were no plantations and few slaves in the mountainous western part of the state. These differing perspectives show in the fraught election of 1860 and its aftermath. North Carolina's electoral votes went to Southern Democrat John C. Breckinridge, an adamant supporter of slavery who hoped to extend the "peculiar institution" to the United States' western territories, rather than to the Constitutional Union candidate, John Bell, who carried much of the upper South. Yet North Carolina (in marked contrast to most of the states that Breckinridge carried) was reluctant to secede from the Union when it became clear that Republican Abraham Lincoln had won the presidential election. In fact, North Carolina did not secede until May 20, 1861, after the fall of Fort Sumter and the secession of the Upper South's bellwether, Virginia. North Carolina was the last state to secede from the Union, leaving thirteen days after Tennessee.

TL;DR: North Carolina seceded from the Union in large part because of its geographical location. Not all people from the south, then or now, are bigoted, evil, backwards people.

[–]madscientist777 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Of course there were many abolitionists in the south, but most didn't speak out for risk of being run out of town or murdered, especially in some border states where pro- and anti-slavery groups were waging guerrilla warfare. There were also pro-slavery supporters living in the North.

[–]yellowstone10 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The issue isn't really with Southerners in general, it's with Southerners who still try to defend the Confederacy. Sort of like how I don't dislike Germans, but if one were to argue that the Nazis weren't as bad as people say they were, we've got issues.

[–]aphasic 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I grew up in Texas, our schools did not teach that the civil war was primarily driven by slavery. They preferred a more nuanced gray area analysis, that involved discussion of states rights, federalism, etc. There was a lot of mention of the slavery debate leading up to it, but it was downplayed. Probably more than anything because slavery is embarrassing to southern states today. One thing they damned sure didn't teach is that part of the reason for the texas revolution is that mexico didn't allow slavery in their territories.

[–]thedesolateone 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm not trying to say slavery wasn't important in the US Civil War, just that it wasn't that important for Abe Lincoln. Incidentally, I don't think the Civil War was justified, and I think the North, if it had truly humanitarian goals, could have had much more success by promoting slave rebellions, supporting runaway slaves, embargoing slave goods with the Navy (we have to remember they kept nearly all of the US Navy, and foreign trade was vital economically to the South) or simply buying them out (this would have been cheaper in both money, and blood).

[–]Mason11987 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The North fought the South (which captured Fort Sumter, striking first) in order to preserve the union.

The south struck because they feared Lincoln would get rid of slavery, which is what they stated in their secession statements.

[–]abadgaem 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The objective of the Unionists was to preserve the union at any cost, even giving up slavery abolition legislative efforts to appease the South. Southerners weren't satisfied with and distrusted northern overtures, and ultimately decided to secede and strike first to preserve slavery.

[–]Freakears 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The point of the war was originally to save the Union, but later it became about slavery. That's certainly why South Carolina (at least) seceded.

[–]oboewan42 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Lincoln never freed a single slave.

The Emancipation Proclamation (which was of sketchy constitutionality in the first place, since Lincoln used his war powers to declare it) only mentioned slaves in the Confederacy. It specifically exempted:

  • Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware (which were slave states but were not part of the Confederacy)
  • West Virginia (which was, at the time, in the process of seceding from Virginia and rejoining the Union, despite being a slave state)
  • Tennessee and parts of Louisiana (which were slave states and part of the Confederacy, but of which the Union had, for the most part, regained control)

In addition to these exemptions, you have to remember that the Proclamation only applied to the Confederacy, which was, well, at war with the United States. This meant that it was one hundred percent unenforceable.

I've seen the Emancipation Proclamation compared to if FDR had issued an executive order demanding that Hitler stop killing Jews.

(A full end to slavery didn't come until the Thirteenth Amendment almost three years later.)

[–]aphasic 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, that one was the most pitch-perfect of them all. I could just picture OReilly saying that one word for word.

[–]saltywings 63 points64 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

African American or Anti-American? Priceless.

[–]dediobst 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"All men are created equal? Sounds like a socialist idea, Mr. King, and we won't have that in Amuricah. Back to you Glen"

[–]rreyv 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sounds like a communist idea....

FTFY

[–]SLOWchildrenplaying 146 points147 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Slavery comes in, cotton goes out. You can't explain that Mr.Lincoln.

[–]gyrferret 9 points10 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This provided a gross mental image of slaves dumped at a factory then cotton coming out of the other.... :/

[–]AFakeName 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Is that not how it worked?

[–]gyrferret 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And here I thought they worked in fields. Silly me. Fox News must have rewrote my textbook.

American History 1777-1950. Version 3. Sponsored by Fox! Simpsons on at 7 pacific!

[–]FuQuam 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I thought that was Soylent Green or whatever...

[–]libertyfrog 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I once did a basic report on support for revolution at and around the time of the Boston Tea Party. This slide is actually pretty accurate. Most people at the time did consider the Boston tea party to be an act of terrorism and an attack on the colonies.

Most scholars estimate by the beginning of the revolution only about 1/3 of the population supported it, not a majority uprising that many envision.

[–]doug346578910 24 points25 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You should definitely check out r/RedditThroughHistory

edit: RTH!

[–]Billy_droptables[S] 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Oh, didn't realize this was a repost, I stumbled across it from a non-redditor friend's Facebook.

[–]brainlessnick 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And so, the circle was completed.

[–]thisissamsaxton 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Is it me or was Soledad O'Brien photoshopped in there as a Fox News anchor? Talk about out of place!

[–]charsen 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I think she did a documentary about MLK Jr. pretty recently, so they probably just took a screen cap from that and slapped the FOX stuff on it.

[–]alienangel2 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Man, I'm oddly pleased that I remember enough of "people I had a crush on when I was twelve" to still recognize her :D

[–]Wrym 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Heh! Miscegenation: will it lead to the end of the U.S.?

[–]danny841 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'd Soledad her O'Brien if you know what I mean. I mean I'd have sex with her.

[–]dufftime 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

i saw that too.. had to check cnn.com to make sure she didn't head over with her former morning buddy bill hemmer.

[–]Grapes- 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The crucifixion being ruled a "carpentry accident" was the best thing

[–]agitate71 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Personally, I don't think Shep Smith should have been included. He's not one of the bad ones.

[–]alexanderwales 27 points28 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just so you know, the protesters at Kent State really were violent. That's why the National Guard was called in. They proceeded to fuck things up royally, but before the shootings took place (and possibly a little bit later, when the sequence of events was still confused), that might have been a legitimate headline.

[–]muffdyvr 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[citation]

The students were unarmed and participating in a peaceful protest. The National Guard was called at the behest of the Mayor of Kent to the Governor of Ohio, because he claimed to have gotten threats from the protest organizers. He also thought the protest would threaten the status-quo of the University and town. He called them in to disperse the crowd. This was not an unusual tactic for the time, especially since the incident at the Chicago Democratic National Convention of 1968.

The shootings were never ordered. In fact, at trial, one of the guardsmen stated this. Eyewitnesses state there was no violence toward the guardsmen as one of them overreacted after tear gas was deployed.

[–]alexanderwales 19 points20 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Protesters were throwing rocks at the Guardsmen, and in the previous three days there had been vandalism, looting, and they had set the ROTC building on fire. From wikipedia.

From the Kent State website:

Friday evening in downtown Kent began peacefully with the usual socializing in the bars, but events quickly escalated into a violent confrontation between protestors and local police. The exact causes of the disturbance are still the subject of debate, but bonfires were built in the streets of downtown Kent, cars were stopped, police cars were hit with bottles, and some store windows were broken. The entire Kent police force was called to duty as well as officers from the county and surrounding communities. Kent Mayor Leroy Satrom declared a state of emergency, called Governor James Rhodes' office to seek assistance, and ordered all of the bars closed. The decision to close the bars early increased the size of the angry crowd. Police eventually succeeded in using tear gas to disperse the crowd from downtown, forcing them to move several blocks back to the campus.

Members of the Ohio National Guard were already on duty in Northeast Ohio, and thus they were able to be mobilized quickly to move to Kent. As the Guard arrived in Kent at about 10 p.m., they encountered a tumultuous scene. The wooden ROTC building adjacent to the Commons was ablaze and would eventually burn to the ground that evening, with well over 1000 demonstrators surrounding the building. Controversy continues to exist regarding who was responsible for setting fire to the ROTC building, but radical protestors were assumed to be responsible because of their actions in interfering with the efforts of firemen to extinguish the fire as well as cheering the burning of the building. Confrontations between Guardsmen and demonstrators continued into the night, with tear gas filling the campus and numerous arrests being made.

While the rally that was taking place at the time of the shootings was peaceful, I don't think it's any stretch to say that the protesters had displayed a considerable amount of violence and disregard for public safety and the law. The shootings were tragic and totally unnecessary, but the whole reason that the National Guard was there was because things were getting out of hand.

[–]muffdyvr 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Agreed. Thanks for clearing that up.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]Socialism 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This shit is literally older than reddit. I remember the original Fark photoshop contest from like 2003-2004.

[–]gyrferret 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Mmmmm.... Fossilized shit...... </Homer voice>

[–]featherrocketship 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Liked this, but I got hung up on the Boston Tea Party one. Only because the use of the term "America" to describe the British colonies in N. America in the late 18th Century is anachronistic. Correct me if I'm wrong: I'm no history buff.

[–]zeravanta 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The heading for the spanish inquisition, cute and welcome reference to Monty Python, but weakens the entire picture. Maybe something more like, "working towards a stronger society." Or "Do your civic duty." That is more like the spin of Fox and Murdoch.

[–]LeftPocket 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

another day, another redditor making fun of fox news. whodathunkit

[–]palonious 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you ever look at most of the reports from the 60's, that's what they basically say. University of Wisconsin : Police fight off protesters (who were sitting peaceably in the hall)

almost every report has the cops doing their job against the stoned hippies and Peaceful protesters

[–]tallandlanky 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What time does Romes scariest chariot chases start?

[–]bitchkat 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Is that what Jimmy is covering these days?

[–]nefarion 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

LMAO "we found him like that." BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[–]bizarrofred 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Funniest part of the whole thing!

[–]Dhghomon 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was checking out newspapers from 1936 the other day (on this site, very addictive BTW) and lo and behold, pretty much the same as Fox News today - if you are a successful businessman the Democrats hate you, First Communist President, New Dealers are Communists in disguise, etc. Or rather, pretty much the same as blogs like Red State and Free Republic since this is the written word instead of spoken news.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

People who like this may also enjoy: the Canadian show History Bites, by some of the same people who did the Red Green show.

[–]Bender216 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I could swear most of these images came from a Cracked.com article. Does anyone have the source?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Actually it was a Fark "photoshop" thread from 2003.

[–]phrank12 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Holy shit that was hilarious

[–]obrien321 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just brilliant, OP - I've done a couple of these panels and appreciate all of the detail you put in - really awesome, wish I had a 100 upvotes.

[–]Qwirk 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Should have finished with one of their actual headlines.

[–]flukshun 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

that would've taken away from the realism

[–]ropers 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

1st Century Fox

Well played, sire, well played.

[–]Czulander 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No one EXPECTS the Spanish Inquisition, not SUSPECTS. Americants fail again.

[–]hoju1123 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This really isn't anything new Hearst was doing this more then 100 years ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism#Origins:_Pulitzer_vs._Hearst

[–]NightEmber79 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fox News was there for most of that. Except they used to call it Hearst Publications.

[–]nutsackninja 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I am a conservative and I thought this was really funny.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Haha, yeah we're fascist blowhards who are always wrong aren't we! High five.

[–]outraged3 4 points5 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm racking my brain trying to think of examples of the opposite.

Either positions taken by conservatives of the time, who prevailed, and where the general consensus now is that they were right.

Or

Examples of positions taken by progressives, who prevailed, and where the general consensus now is that they were wrong.

Essentially I'm wondering . . . Does the progressive consensus always end up being embraced and validated as correct by mainstream acceptance or not? What are some counter examples?

[–]alexanderwales 21 points22 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Prohibition is the biggest one. The U.S. eugenics movement was also progressive in nature.

[–]anonymousasshole 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Um... ever heard of Communism?

[–]usetheminedetector 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Counterexamples? Well, Bolshevism I guess.

[–]GargamelCuntSnarf 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's not that the things 'progressive' people advocate are necessarily more correct; the things that become more accepted over time are the things that progress the cause of humanitarianism.

[–]this_or_this 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Wow, it's funny because it's true!

[–]Zarith7480 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ha ha @ Jesus on cross, it makes me kinda offended though at how accurate a lot of these are. :(

[–]Presii 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is funny.

This is probably also an accurate guess.

This makes me sad.

[–]hivoltage815 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Do you always structure your sentences like Dr. Suess?

[–]Presii 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I guess it depends on my mood at the time

But hey, at least I didn't rhyme.

[–]excitom 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I got downvoted in /r/politics for saying a story wasn't credible since fox news was the source. To hell with 'em.

[–]Mulsanne 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If reddit had been there it would be just as biased, only to the left instead of the right.

[–]smartyskirt01 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

you should post this in /r/redditthroughhistory! I would but I dont believe in stealing others' goodies

[–]Billy_droptables[S] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Apparently it was already posted on there, I didn't even know that was a subreddit until someone pointed it out earlier in this thread.

[–]PBAsydney 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Last one made my laugh, love MP.

[–]EquinsuOcha 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The sad thing is that there were many people who did exactly that when it came to Martin Luther King Jr.

[–]welcome2dc 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Oh, I get it. Libertarians and conservatives are RACIST. Smart humour! Would read again.

[–]flukshun 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

looks like you didn't get it, actually, but glad you enjoyed it.

[–]hoffhall 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hysterical AND right on point.

[–]anotherdroid 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

morning!

[–]r3dstormrising 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Genius

[–]thudwhomper 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Upvote for the idea, not so much for the follow through.

[–]richieboy89 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I wish I could upvote this twice

[–]chyzykn 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The last one is my fav.

[–]WWGFD 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

yep that's about right

[–]fuzzb0y 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

there would be no history.

[–]KarmicBookGuy 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Worst. Font. Ever.

[–]Epi117 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Wtf soledad is with fox?

[–]Driese 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I hate Fox News as much as any other redditor, but I think that one could argue that any major news network is going to tell the story with their own opinion already in mind.

[–]flukshun 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

but few news organizations would have such a predictable bias given any particular conflict. especially interesting is how often those positions are completely contradictory, yet predictable nonetheless.

[–]jetmax25 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

"Remember the Maine to hell with Spain"

Fox news has been there throughout history in one form or another. Its called yellow journalism

[–]TuriGuiliano 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Oh i get it, because Fox isn't a real news source and reports things that are totally warped, biased, and misconstrued

[–]LLordRSom 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not strictly correct about the original "Tea Party" as Murdoch is virulently anti-monarchy, so he would have supported the secession.

[–]moviedude26 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A million upvotes especially for Python reference!

[–]Detka 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

No one expects the Spanish Inquistion!

[–]charlie6969 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Pilate: "We found him like that."

I lost it completely and now have the hiccups.

[–]nathris[!] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]Diesel_Dog 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

HUUUUGE upvote for the Monty Python reference!

[–]pie-man 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

that was awsome

[–]talkloud 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Good idea, poor execution

[–]lorax108 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

hahahahaha that is great!!!!

[–]mrpeabody208 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Where's the birth certificate, Mr. Van Buren?

[–]AdmiralWolverine 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It seems the cross-beams gone askew on the tredle.

[–]jochens 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

instant upvote for monty python reference!

[–]mambypambyland -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How do people watch this crap?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

40% of this country like the alternative narrative it presents.

Fox is VERY pro-Christian, and at least 30% of this country is devout Christian and tired of getting shit on by everyone. Fox is home for them.

Same thing for rural people, rich people, social and fiscal conservatives.

[–]MJG2007[!] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Confirmation bias gone wild.

[–]whiskeytango 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You really think Reddit is not as Fox News when it comes to politics?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I work in a federal office. FOX is streaming on nearly every TV. Makes me sad that I work with ignorants.

[–]santa4nt 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Wait. In a federal office. Owned by the federal government? Against whom Fox rants every day? The irony...

[–]A10050 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Know thy enemy.

[–]NewSeams -1 points0 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I signed in to upvote this

[–]ruinercollector 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

RE: FWD: FWD: FWD: HILARIOUS FOX NEWS JOKE

[–]qp0n 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If MLK wasn't a Republican, some of this might've been funny.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It would have been funnier if it actually tied in with the views Fox News holds rather than just portraying them as the bad guy in every scenario. I don't like Fox news either, but come on.

[–]abuttt 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't necessarily agree; These images parodied two of Fox News' policies:

  1. supporting the power-holding establishment, even when doing so requires them to distort the truth
  2. using sensationalistic stories about terrorism to cause fear in the viewing audience.

I'd say it's pretty accurate from that perspective.

I'll admit the Spanish Inquisition one is just a silly Monty Python joke and doesn't really make sense when taken with the rest.

[–]SgtBursk 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

supporting the power-holding establishment, even when doing so requires them to distort the truth

What is this, 2006?

It held true when these images were created, back when Bush was in office. Now that Fox News constantly berates the current president, the jokes presented by the OP do seem inappropriate.

[–]whiskeytango 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

They just tied them to the views that a conservative would hold.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This was originally a FARK photoshop thread and was my intro to Fark, back around 2003. Ah yes:

http://www.fark.com/comments/485972/Theme-What-if-Fox-News-were-around-during-other-historical-events-Link-goes-to-a-representative-screencap

[–]AdmiralJackbar 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is interesting. Conservatives, by definition, are usually advocates of the status quo so, of course, it's very easy to tie them to what, in retrospect, we found to be barbaric practices/ideas. Because of this, I don't know that this logic contributes anything really towards the conservative/progressive debate.

[–]flukshun 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

it highlights how wrong conservative stances on things tend to be in retrospect, and also points out how empty sentiments like "patriotism" are from an organization that would've most likely been calling our founding fathers terrorists.

[–]Sven2774 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What's funny is that I am pretty sure that Lincoln was a Republican.

[–]waffleninja 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This looks familiar. O wait, it's been reposted on reddit about 50 times.

http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/related/gic9g/if_fox_news_had_been_there_throughout_history/

[–]jgoette 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Haha! I get it! Fox News jokes are funny! Bring on the karma!

[–]pearcewg 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I actually agree with the Kent State picture. Not that I like Fox News or Bill O'reilly, but that is a good example of a story which came about during completely one sided news, and could be up for some interpretation about the students.

[–]PervertInDisguise -2 points-1 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Can we please pay to have the posted on Billboards?

[–]sundowntg -2 points-1 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The would have REALLY hated MLKJ.

[–]A_Straw_Man 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A Google search gets you not one or two, but DOZENS of links to this picture. What, precisely, made you decide to re-load this on imgur and post it without giving credit?

[–]Wazowski 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, whoever ripped all these from that Fark thread is totally getting the shaft!

[–]thedesolateone -2 points-1 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fox News tends to be fairly tame in its perspective, when we refer to actual news, in comparison to MSNBC etc., it is the opinion which involves the heavy 'bias', but one can't be biased in one's opinions in any case, so this can hardly be considered an issue. Equally it is important to remember that Fox News opinion/commentary isn't meant to be taken entirely seriously -- it's entertainment first with serious political reporting a distant second.

[–]temujin1234 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Fox uses opinions throughout their broadcast. During the more regular news sections they simply bring in analysts or experts who promote whatever point they're trying to make.

[–]hitlerwasright -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ummm... Fox News would not have been in favor of slavery or segregation.

Those were both Democrat positions.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

but the 2 parties, Democrat and Republicans, did not stand for the same thing they do these days.