this post was submitted on
751 points (57% like it)
2,891 up votes 2,140 down votes

pics

subscribe2,318,997 readers

12,107 users here now

Looking for an image subreddit with minimal rules? Check out /r/images

A place to share interesting photographs and pictures. Feel free to post your own, but please read the rules first (see below), and note that we are not a catch-all for general images (of screenshots, comics, etc.)

Spoiler code

Please mark spoilers like this:
[text here](/spoiler)

Hover over to read.

Rules

  1. No screenshots, or pictures with added or superimposed text. This includes image macros, comics, info-graphics and most diagrams. Text (e.g. a URL) serving to credit the original author is exempt.

  2. No gore or porn. NSFW content must be tagged.

  3. No personal information. This includes anything hosted on Facebook's servers, as they can be traced to the original account holder. Stalking & harassment will not be tolerated.

  4. No solicitation of votes (including "cake day" posts), posts with their sole purpose being to communicate with another redditor, or [FIXED] posts. DAE posts go in /r/DoesAnybodyElse. "Fixed" posts should be added as a comment to the original image.

  5. Submissions must link directly to a specific image file or to an image hosting website with minimal ads. We do not allow blog hosting of images ("blogspam"), but links to albums on image hosting websites are okay. URL shorteners are prohibited.

  • If your submission appears to be filtered but definitely meets the above rules, please send us a message with a link to the comments section of your post (not a direct link to the image). Don't delete it as that just makes the filter hate you!

  • If you come across any rule violations, please report the submission or message the mods and one of us will remove it!

Please also try to come up with original post titles. Submissions that use certain clichés/memes will be automatically tagged with a warning.

Links

If your post doesn't meet the above rules, consider submitting it on one of these other subreddits:

Comics  
/r/comics /r/webcomics
/r/vertical /r/f7u12
/r/ragenovels /r/AdviceAtheists
Image macros Screenshots/text
/r/lolcats /r/screenshots
/r/AdviceAnimals /r/desktops
/r/Demotivational /r/facepalm (Facebook)
/r/reactiongifs /r/DesktopDetective
Wallpaper Animals
/r/wallpaper /r/aww
/r/wallpapers /r/cats
The SFWPorn Network /r/TrollingAnimals
  /r/deadpets
  /r/birdpics
  /r/foxes
Photography Un-moderated pics
/r/photography /r/AnythingGoesPics
/r/photocritique /r/images
/r/HDR
/r/windowshots
/r/PictureChallenge
Misc New reddits
/r/misc /r/britpics
/r/gifs Imaginary Network
/r/dataisbeautiful /r/thennnow
/r/picrequests /r/SpecArt
  /r/LookWhoIMet
  /r/timelinecovers
  /r/MemesIRL
  /r/OldSchoolCool
  /r/photoshopbattles

Also check out http://irc.reddit.com

a community for

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own! learn more ›

top 200 commentsshow all 370

[–]DJwalrus 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

what happens if I wash plastic spoons and reuse them??? Oh got you good fucker!

[–]redrockmullet 137 points138 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I feel it's one of the detriments of stupidity when people don't put any thought into their tirades. The images creator obviously did not take into account that the spoon was made from the leftovers of the refining process. The oil was drilled and shipped primarily to create usable fuels like gasoline, diesel, kerosene and etc. The spoon was made out of otherwise useless byproducts. The creater of the image fallaciously assumed that all the effort of drilling and shipping and processing was to just make spoons. By creating an object of intrinsic value the utinsel manufacturer did us the service of adding convenience out of an otherwise harmful mass of leftover sludge. Also, the spoon can be recycled... provided the person using it doesn't just toss it in the trash. I'd say its a triumph of engineering.

[–]geoken 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

To add to what you've said, I have plastic spoons in my cutlery drawer that have been in use for several months. The forks usually don't fare as well, but I've also managed to keep some of them for a considerable amount of time.

[–]Laboratory 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

As a chemist, I know that it is patently untrue that the chemicals that go into the spoon are waste. The spoon is likely very highly refined polystyrene or polypropylene. This material can be used to make countless items. Sure you could say that if we didn't make these items, the polymer would be useless, but that is like saying that if we didn't use gas then gas would be a useless byproduct of plastic production.

I think the point is pretty clear. First you must acknowledge that the production of plastics is a an energy intensive process compared to the production of soap (again, I know this to be true, check my comment history where I explained soap production yesterday). Second you make the comparison between the resources used in creating a spoon and the resources used in creating soap and washing the spoon. The result depends on how you value your time vs disposing of a non-renewable resource. However to try and dismiss the resources used in spoon production is straight bullshit. Also, the recycling argument is nice but not realistic. Look at the recycling stats. That's not the world we live in. Also a spoon can't be recycled into a spoon. It can only be downcycled into a crappier plastic. That's how recycling works. The polymers from food-grade plastics only come from virgin fossil fuels unless indicated otherwise and that is like <2% of the market at best.

[–]thebrandnewbob 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I know you probably won't believe me, but this is an image my brother made a few years ago and posted it on his website as a joke. It's pretty funny to see it get reposted every once in a while in a serious context, when it wasn't a serious statement at all when he originally made it.

[–]redrockmullet 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Source?

[–]thebrandnewbob 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's hard to source it since the website is no longer up. Here's a link that at least shows that the spoon picture came from his website. Like I said, you probably won't believe me, but that's the closest I can get to a source.

[–]ImpenetrableTaco 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yes! AND, without that awesomeness, we would never have had the privilege of using a SPORK!

SPORK people, SPORK!

[–]Apocolypse007 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I heart my spork

Got it for christmas two years ago. Been using it for almost every meal since.

[–]watermark0n 231 points232 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, this is one of the most most oversimplified economic calculations I've ever seen.

[–]Dawgishly 30 points31 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Who brings plastic spoons home anyways?

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You've played knifey spoony before.

[–]slapded[!] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

ever play tummysticks?

[–]drakeypoo 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You are the second person I have ever heard call it that. Or maybe you're the same person, I dunno.

[–]slapded[!] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]drakeypoo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

:O

[–]mattindustries 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

haha... I do :-(

In my defense, I can be really lazy.

[–]Ishkabo 17 points18 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's a great defense.

[–]Spiro_Agnew 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ah, some sanity. Thank you.

[–]Thue -3 points-2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How is it oversimplified? It doesn't seem oversimplified to me.

[–]tallwill514 78 points79 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A couple reasons.

First, it doesn't take into account the fact that perhaps the effort required for the plastic spoon yields thousands of plastic spoons and items. Once you consider the effort/cost associated with one spoon, it may in fact be more efficient.

Most importantly, it's only "complicating" one side of the equation. If you're going to divide the plastic spoon manufacturing that way, you have to divide the "just wash the spoon when you're done with it" task too: you had to dig a well for water or find a water source, extract and refine minerals to make the spoon and the metal pipes/hardware involved, treat the water, pump the water everywhere using whatever form of energy is applicable, make the soap, make the plastic bottle to hold the soap, ship everything, but before all that you had to create the universe.

Point is, it's an oversimplification that cannot be taken seriously.

[–]averyrdc 17 points18 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Now I wish to make some apple pie from scratch.

[–]zBriGuy 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Step 1. Invent the universe.

[–]forlornhope 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That, as I found out, is the equivalent of dividing by zero.

[–]bosco54 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I tried that, but all I got was a funny smell.

[–]jonneeBgoode 24 points25 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There are times and places, like work or on a picnic, where the "cost" of metal spoons is measured in different terms than the cost to manufacture. Disposable spoons have a greater utility in some cases.

The questionable aspect of this type of disposable spoon is that it is made from a non-renewable resource: crude oil. For that reason, this particular spoon is, in my opinion, bad.

However there are spoons that come from other materials, such as potato starch, that are of course renewable. And more expensive. And some brands disolve pretty quickly. So that is why you still see crude oil spoons. Solve those two problems, and we can do away with that bad spoon.

[–]backtoaster 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just the other day I visited a sushi place that had disposable knives, forks, spoons and eating sticks, all made of wood.

[–]textrovert 5 points6 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Isn't the ecological question kind of embedded in this critique of capitalism, though? That it reduces "value" to the immediate and monetary? It erases all sign of its production, including the unsustainable materials used, human labor, and transport, that only people with money and/or education can "afford" to concern themselves with.

I mean, in a pure capitalist system, those potato starch spoons aren't going to overtake these - because, as you say, it's more expensive and there's a cheaper option, the only value capitalism cares about.

[–]Areonis 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I mean, in a pure capitalist system, those potato starch spoons aren't going to overtake these - because, as you say, it's more expensive and there's a cheaper option, the only value capitalism cares about.

This is true for the moment. It won't be true when crude oil starts to become scarce. At that point, the price will shoot up because the demand will be much higher than the supply. Once this happens, other methods of producing plastic will gain a foothold because the price to produce plastic in those ways will be comparable to the price of using oil. Of course, this does mean in the end, we will be stuck with more expensive disposable spoons for a while.

[–]osoII 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It should also be noted that oil is heavily subsidized, without that subsidization it probably would be better to wash the spoon. So it's not capitalism that causes people to favor the disposable option in this case, it's socialism.

[–]ericmoritz 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Best comment ever.

[–]osoII 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Using a non renewable resource is not necessarily bad. It's the use of these resources that frees up labor from the tasks of producing food and other essentials, allowing for things like science and technological advancement. Also oil can be produced from coal, plastics from plants, cars can run on alcohol, etc. etc.

In the absence of subsidies and targeted fiscal policy we could be assured that the rationing of resources through price by the market would be exceptionally accurate over time. So the use of a non renewable resource and the transition from one to the next would be as smooth as could be expected considering the changes taking place. Unfortunately in this case oil is heavily subsidized, meaning people will be using it long after it is no longer economically sound, development of other forms of energy will be stunted, and our resources will be mis-allocated. But it should be noted that the cause (subsidies) of the mis-allocation is socialist in nature, not capitalist.

[–]PolityAgent 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There are 3 economic and ecological costs to take into account: the cost to manufacture, the cost of maintenance, and the cost of disposal. When making ecological arguments, people often focus on one, and ignore the other two.

  • The amount of energy and resources required to manufacture a metal spoon is astronomically higher than the resources required to manufacture a plastic spoon. This differential in resources is reflected in the cost of the spoons. If one measures the ecological impact of metal versus plastic spoons during manufacture, a metal spoon causes far more ecological damage than a plastic one.

  • The maintenance cost of the metal spoon ("washing") includes the cost of water, transportation of water, heating of water, addition of chemical soaps to the water, and the cost of treating the water to remove impurities. The plastic spoon has no maintenance costs - it is thrown away. If one measures the ecological impact of metal versus plastic spoons during maintenance, a metal spoon causes far more ecological damage than a plastic one.

  • While both the metal and plastic spoons will eventually be disposed of, the metal spoon obviously has a longer lifespan, meaning that fewer of them will be discarded. Both can be recycled, so they don't have to reside in a landfill, but that's where they will probably end up. If one measures the ecological impact of metal versus plastic spoons during disposal, a plastic spoon causes more ecological damage than a metal one due to volume.

[–]osoII 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Thank you, sir.

[–]mrkuder 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

well you could factor the extra water used in washing the utensils things like that, while plastic produced on a larger scale would be more efficient in that sense. although then you can look into the effect on the environment due to low biodegradation of plastic... in the end there are many more factors to determine effort involved in making the plastic spoon, hence the oversimplification comment.

[–]kearneycation 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's a shame that you're getting downvoted for opening up the discussion. Sometimes it seems everyone on reddit wants to just read one-liners and nod in agreement.

[–]ineededanewname 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Its oversimplified because it wasn't the only one to be produced and shipped. It was amongst millions of other spoons.

[–]bottom 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

well, care to explain?

[–]padadiso 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's why I take metal spoons and just dispose of them.

[–]happywaffle 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's why I eat my plastic spoons.

[–]BurritoTime 382 points383 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's pretty amazing that our society has reached a point where the effort necessary to extract coal from the ground, truck it to a power plant, use the power to pump water hundreds of miles to cities in places without enough water to sustain the population, mix it with soap containing dozens of chemicals, and use the mixture to scrub a piece of metal...

is considered to be less effort than what it takes to just grab a new spoon out of the box.

Look! I can make condescending arguments too!

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]coolshifts 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But capitalism does work. In the workplace it cost less to buy disposable than to pay someone to clean. At home where your time is free it's another story.

[–]rlbond86 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Except that it doesn't do what's best for the human race

[–]brickmaj 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I agree. That's why I feel like the free market should little/no hold on certain areas that have HUGE implications for the human race: the environment, health care and WAR. The free market is great for other things like video games and sports equipment.

[–]Beararms 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

or rather those areas should be incentivized, like plastic spoons being taxed so heavily that we'd have enough money to fix any environment problems they might cause.

[–]asshair 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

yeah you can!

I feel absolutely stupendesouly condescended right now...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Dawn, like most conventional dishwashing liquids, contains petro (read: oil) chemical-based detergents, emollients, and fragrance.

Help the earth and eat with your hands.

[–]PaintballerCA 46 points47 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How is this specific to capitalism?

[–]joshuax 76 points77 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Because it's the only economic system with a lot of food in it. /troll

[–]chime 12 points13 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't see why you added a '/troll' to your comment. It makes perfect sense.

[–]joshuax 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Two reasons, my initial comment was much more trolling, and because I didn't want people to start attacking me. If they think I'm trolling I can say whatever and just be ignored... actually, I think I'll just /troll to a lot of comments.

[–]Will_Eat_For_Food 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Maybe you should add a /troll in yours.

[–][deleted] ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[deleted]

[–]Tagedieb 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, thats Germany, not Soviet Russia in this case.

[–]butth0lez 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

*Of starvation.

[–]xmsxms 2 points3 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Capitalism allows economies of scale, which makes plastic spoon production and use viable. Pretty much the point of the image.

[–]th3guys2 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What about China and their disposable chopsticks cutting down millions of acres of forests? They have some of the most watered down versions of capitalism/free market, and are arguably much more despotic in nature than capitalist.

[–]lessplasticplease 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What a terrible argument. Downvoted.

[–]paveln 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If I'm holding a barbecue with a large number of guests, there's no way I'm bringing out my plates/spoons/forks, using them then bringing them back inside to wash instead of just paying $5 and being done with it.

[–]Antares42 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Me too, but two things to consider:

1) This works because oils is still cheap. I'd say we have better things to use what's left of it on other that disposable cutlery, but that may be just me.

2) I think as long as you're not using plastic cutlery for each and every meal, even most (reasonable) environmentalists won't be angry at you. There has to be a trade-off between consumption/waste and convenience.

[–]EquanimousMind 13 points14 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Or.. it shows one the benefits of capitalism, that through the efficiencies gained through diversification and trade we can reach such a point of productivity that we can do these amazing things at practically pennies a pop!

[–]Slimey79 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Mumble mumble... something about locating sources of water, moving water, removing particulates, testing water quality, locating sources of phosphorous, processing phosphorous, testing and packaging soap, utilizing petroleum to move soap, washing spoon, and managing the resulting water...

[–]suprmario 21 points22 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Is there data out there that determines the cost of soap/water of washing each steel spoon? Hand washing vs. dishwasher?

[–]formulaic 22 points23 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

NO, THERE ISN'T.

USE YOUR DAMN METAL SPOON, eating with plastic ones sucks.

[–]absolutelynothing 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I wonder how many plastic spoons you can make with the same amount of energy you have to spend to make a metal one.

[–]errerr 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I remember reading somewhere that a ceramic mug takes a lot more energy to make than X number of foam cups, and so you would have to use it X number of times before it benefits the environment over just using foam cups every day.

[–]Merlaak 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Here's an article that compares styrofoam cups, ceramic mugs, and stainless steel mugs.

In short, it takes 46 uses of a ceramic mug for it to be better for the environment than the styrofoam cup. In addition, it takes 369 uses of the stainless steel mug for it to be better than the styrofoam cup.

[–]Antares42 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Which is still less than a year (given my consumption of coffee), and I don't throw the steel mug out afterwards...

[–]Merlaak 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Right. I think most people use a ceramic mug at least 46 times, making it the better choice from an ecological standpoint.

[–]Beararms 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

and the stainless steel one could last you years without breaking.

[–]Merlaak 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm confused ... are we arguing? I agree with what everyone is saying!

[–]Beararms 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I was also agreeing, pointing out that the stainless steel one might have an even greater advantage over the styrofoam

[–]Tagedieb 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, thats really interesting.

[–]funnynickname 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

According to this, a ceramic mug pays for itself after 39 uses vs styrofoam.

http://www.ecodaddyo.com/disposable-vs-reusable

*Edit. This page claims 500 times. And it takes more energy to wash your mug than it does to make a styrofoam cup.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/energy/poweringdown/2009/01/coffee-cup-contest.html

[–]Antares42 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

From the latter one:

In the end, the ceramic mug comes out as the most eco-friendly choice, but only if you keep using it and maybe even use it more than once between washing. (I'd suggest rinsing between uses. Otherwise, it sounds a wee bit gross.)

I'm using my cups/mugs for many, many years. Also, I'll admit that I didn't read the article linked in the article, but do they take into account that washing mugs scales as well? I fill my sink once and add a little soap. Doesn't seem excessive to me...

[–]zeppelinfromled 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, I'd be interested in seeing the overall impact of throwing away plastic spoons versus washing metal ones. Both have some initial cost for creation and distribution, which is probably higher for the metal one, and then the water and soap cost for the metal one as well. I wonder how many time you have to use a spoon for the metal one to win out.

[–]Vik1ng 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I suppose the cost for the dishwasher is very low as spoons take up very little place compared to the rest of the dishes. When it comes to hand washing it depends if you let the water run all the time or just fill the sink once and just let the clean water run later on (you know what i mean ...).

[–]SanitySquad 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Who says you cant wash plastic-spoons?

[–]Brimshae 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Detriment of capitalism? No.

Laziness of people? Yes.

[–]sangjmoon 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I consider myself a fiscal conservative, and I wash and reuse all my plastic utensils and cups until they break. It surprises me how many people around me who consider themselves left leaning look down on my practice.

[–]Waldegrave 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I don't even think even 30% of the people in the US who can afford silverware would replace the aforementioned with disposable eating utensils.

I mean, sure, it's considered less effort, because for the "end user" it's almost inarguably easier/simpler, with the consideration of how much you worked to earn the utensils, typically making the overall better investment of reusable silverware more appealing.

[–]Brimshae 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, to be fair, the first house my parents had didn't have hot water in the kitchen, so washing dishes in anything other than cold water involved a large bucket, the bathtub, and a lot of carrying.

BUT, that was a special case.

[–]jmed 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I feel like that's awesome and an example of how far human ingenuity has taken us.

[–]novelty_string 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

After I masturbate I dry those damn tissues out and put them back in the box. Recycling, motherfuckers, that's how I roll.

[–]fillahbuster 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Y U NO USE SOCK?

[–]funkah 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is dumb and if you think it makes some kind of profound point you are also dumb.

[–]omnilynx 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The fact that people throw cheap things away has nothing to do with capitalism. It's just human nature.

Capitalism made the spoon cheap, which is a good thing because it means that a bunch of people can afford it that couldn't before, and the money and effort that used to go into making spoons can now go into making people's lives better in other ways. That's not necessarily unique to capitalism either, by the way, but the point is that making things cheaper is good, regardless of what some people do with cheap things.

[–]GrinningPariah 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Here's the funny part: This makes you imagine huge oil rigs and refineries, giant factory buildings, entire networks of shipping and warehouses, all for this one spoon.

BUT it's not all for that one spoon. It's for millions and millions of them, and I bet if you look all that and divided it by the number of spoons that get made, the effort for each one is less than it takes to wash the spoon.

Especially if the sink is already full of plates and shit anyways.

[–]satiredun 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You also have to take account of the energy involved with iron extraction/refining/manufacturing as well as the water/soap comments that are elsewhere in this thread.

[–]Chionophile 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

but then you can have that same spoon for decades and still be just as good.

[–]electricveal 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's decades of hot water, generated by coal, nuclear or hydro, thats decades of human energy used in the washing (food grown, crops tended by fossil fuel powered tractors and other farm machinery, animals fed by grain imported by petroleum powered vehicles or fed on pastures fertilized by fertilizer derived from oil byproducts and spread by vehicles powered by non-renewable fossil fuels, that food carried to your home by fossil fueled ships that also pollute an inordinate amount or carried to your local feelgood farmers market by a rusty old truck that wouldn't pass emissions testing for a modern vehicle - just as well it's not required to.)

Let's not get into the amount of energy and rare earth metals that went into the computer that you typed your comment on.

[–]zyzex 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

oh yeah, well I wash my plastic utensils! WHAT NOW?!

[–]d313373r 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

and they never break?

[–]zyzex 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

they will overtime, but I'm trying to save money so no harm in doing an act that takes all but a couple seconds.

[–]CodeandOptics 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

yes, when you have a birthday party for kids, I know I always keep 50 spoons in the house for just such an occasion.

What a bunch of tripe. They aren't always used because people are lazy, they are often used because its more practical and cheaper than buying 50 metal spoons for an event.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I often wonder how retarded people (like you) are and yet all work in a system that produces so much wealth.

[–]8002reverse 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The 9/11 knee-jerk led to plastic knives on all aircraft into and out of Australia and is still current.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You realize that all that effort goes towards more than one spoon right?

[–]diplomatika 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And you support it by buying the spoon.

[–]SwedishEngineer 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If this process had been used to produce a plastic spoon, instead of gazillions of plastic spoons, your argument would've been ... valid.

[–]crazyfingers619 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

detriment? I think this shows a tremendous amount of affluence brought on by capitalism.

[–]Antares42 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Two thoughts about capitalism:

  • 400 obscenely rich people, most of whom benefited in some way from the multi-trillion dollar taxpayer "bailout" of 2008, now have more loot, stock and property than the assets of 155 million Americans combined.

  • [..] The poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.

If you believe that capitalism, unregulated and in and of itself, makes one group of people rich without making another group poor, you are delusional.

[–]crazyfingers619 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I didn't say any of this. All I said was the example cited seemed to make capitalism sound bitchen for people who don't like washing spoons.

[–]wfohts1 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What does the scouter say about his stupid levels?

Its over 9000!!!!!1one!

[–]obey_giant 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah. Beautiful, isn't it?

[–]tylerdurden03 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I hate these dumb ass images more than anything else on Reddit. This is the same type of mentality that people like Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin use. Barack Hussein Obama? Muslim name, therefore he is Muslim, tide goes in, tide goes out.

How about we stop taking extremely complex systems, and trying to explain them in less than 20 words.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Because oil companies only go to the effort of extracting oil so they can make a fortune off plastic spoons?! This is the most shit-all-stupid leap in logic I've heard all week. Oil, and for that matter plastic, is used for a helluva lot of other things besides motherfucking spoons. Spoons is what you choose to complain about?

[–]lurker1 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But bringing running/waste water directly to/from your home requires 0 effort, and has 0 environmental impact? Both are futuristic voodoo only made possible within the last little while in human history.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Didn't they have plumbing in Rome?

[–]srs_house 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Yeah, if you like lead pipes.

yay heavy metals!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

\m/

[–]lurker1 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Not with the same water pressure or attention to purification that we have now

[–]yungbumyum 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Except people don't commonly use these utensils at home. These are used in fast food settings, where it would be completely infeasible to give out metal spoons to consumers who have no intention of returning them to the store.

[–]hacksoncode 14 points15 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Meh. The entire social cost of the spoon (modulo pollution, which I'll admit should be accounted for) is included in its price. A plastic spoon is cheap enough to produce that 100 of them can be sold for a couple dollars. If my time washing a spoon is worth more than 2 cents, it's a net win for society (or at least me) to use the plastic spoon.

I'm paid something like $120/hour, or $2/minute. If a spoon takes me more than 1 second to wash (even assuming zero cost for water, gas, and soap), it's a win to use a plastic spoon.

[–]SwampySoccerField 5 points6 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What exactly do you do that warrants $120 an hour? The language skills are clearly apparent here so I figure you have that inner salesman thing going.

[–]slotbadger 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What exactly do you do that warrants $120 an hour?

Who exactly do you do that warrants $120 an hour?

FTFY

[–]I_TYPE_IN_ALL_CAPS 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

HIS NAME IS HACKSONCODE, BUT I'M HAVING A HARD TIME GUESSING WHAT HE CODES THAT BRINGS ~$240K/YR. A.I. AND HIGH-FREQUENCY TRADING ARE THE ONLY OPTIONS THAT COME TO MIND.

[–]angrytroll123 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I used to do HF. Base can be that high but it is rare. In bonuses, you can easily surpass that. You can make that money in base in other industries though. You are right though, not many pull that much bank. I would say HF is the easiest way to do so.

[–]formulaic 11 points12 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

modulo pollution, which I'll admit should be accounted for

That's the issue, all the costs aren't accounted for. Slowly making the planet uninhabitable is a rather large cost.

[–]hacksoncode 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Hey, I'm all for a carbon tax.

But that barely changes the economic calculation at all. Plastic really isn't making the world uninhabitable. It's burning the rest of the oil that's doing that. Plastic is really close to carbon neutral (in as much as it doesn't decompose into CO2 in any reasonable timeframe), and there really isn't that much of it, on any planetary scale.

[–]monkeys_pass 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Processing plastic requires large amounts of energy, which comes most often from burning something. I would say that most of the social costs of the plastic spoon are externalized anyway

[–]amc178 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sure making a spoon requires energy, and has an environmental impact, but you have to look at things relatively. Getting rid of plastic spoons would do nothing, because relative to all other manufacturing and energy uses it is insignificant. Plus if you consider the situation where plastic spoons are most commonly used it is not the normal home situation. They are used for relatively uncommon events.

Say i wanted to hold a party, and at that party there would be cake, hence the need for spoons to eat it with. If i where to plan ahead and by enough spoons for everyone (it will be a huge party, so i need 100) and i decided i would get metal ones (because think of the environment) I would then need to buy a lot more spoons because i only have enough for my regular usage. Those spoons require energy to be made (probably more than the plastic ones), and at the end of the day, i have 100 spoons lying around unused. If i had spent $5 buying plastic ones i could just throw them all out, and i would save time, not to mention washing up.

Ideally from an environmental perspective, everyone should bring their own spoons, but would you turn up to a party that asked you to bring a plate, knife, fork, spoon and cup?

[–]Antares42 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well, I have a beautiful picnic set that includes all of these, and on top of that I have to sets of military/outdoor cutlery.

So... party at your place?

[–]Ishkabo 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And if you value aesthetics or the health of the world more than $0.00 you would use a real fucking spoon.

[–]norsurfit 3 points4 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

umm...pollution is the big social cost that we care about here...

it's a rather large omission to not include that one...

[–]hacksoncode 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ok, but at most that's going to double the cost (don't forget that most of that 2 cents is profit from all the various suppliers along the way... plastic is incredibly cheap, even in resources, to make).

So 2 seconds, at the outside.

[–]norsurfit 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That assumes that you can quantify the environmental harm in dollar terms to fully internalize the social costs of a plastic spoon.

Many would say that environmental impact of taking natural resources to make a plastic spoon, that will languish, non-degrading, along with others of millions such spoons, in landfills for thousands of years, is not fully captured in pure economic terms.

[–]Laboratory 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Well said. This thread is full of people who dismiss the environmental cost and resource cost.
I work in a lab where we burn through plastic products all day. Use once, discard. Once oil is used up (not long from now) research will become incredibly more expensive and difficult. How has anyone figured that into their equations? They havent.

[–]ieattime20 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

A plastic spoon is cheap enough to produce that 100 of them can be sold for a couple dollars.

Even besides pollution, they are far too cheap. You have extortion and rent-seeking in the overseas factory owners, the owners of oil, price volatility, various commodities problems, etc.

The idea that all social costs could be encoded in the price by human beings is ludicrous libertarian fantasy. People simply don't have enough information as individuals.

[–]amc178 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Money is essentially just a comparative item, so it's wrong to say that you can't account for social costs with it.

It may well be true that the costs attributed are wrong, so the social cost is higher than the monetary value assigned to it. But that doesn't mean you can't assign a correct value.

If you made your plastic spoons in Sweden (or some other modern western country), the cost would probably be closer to the real social costs. The only issue is that no one would buy those spoons because the mad in china spoons next to them at the supermarket are a quarter of the price.

[–]hacksoncode 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

And yet, you're attempting to encode all the social costs in a couple of paragraphs. Price isn't perfect, but it does a much better job than that.

If there are externalities, neither I nor most sensible libertarians have any problem with imposing the cost of them on producers.

[–]ieattime20 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

you're attempting to encode all the social costs in a couple of paragraphs. Price isn't perfect, but it does a much better job than that.

Let's assume that you're right, and that it does a much better job than I did in a reddit comment reply after midnight: The price still doesn't encode the "entire social cost of the spoon" even if you divide out the group "pollution".

If there are externalities,

There are always externalities. Some libertarians think that since we can't address all of them, we should just stop worrying about virtually any of them.

[–]hacksoncode 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If you're trying to get me to admit that there are nutjob libertarians, even at the Mises Institution, you'll get no argument here.

There are nutjobs in all political movements, many of them (e.g. Sarah Palin, Pat Robertson, Michael Moore, etc.) that are far more influential and representative of their movement and its philosophy than this example.

[–]suprmario 8 points9 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Sorry, had to downboat for your ridiculous wage in contrast to my poor ass.

[–]redrockmullet 7 points8 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Irony of a gamer downvoting a software programmer for being paid to program is obviously lost on the gamer.

[–]toastedbutts 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

He's using the "arrogant lawyer" technique. Also applies to "freelance web code guy".

Bill 4 hours a week, spend 20 unbillable hours supporting those 4. Brag about income and how every waking moment is a bankroll.

[–]Dracius 4 points5 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I doubt you're payed $120/hour 24hours a day. Wash your damn spoon.

[–]wilwizard 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

That's his entire point. Just the fact that we CAN make these spoons for "less effort" than it takes to wash for them for 2 seconds is kinda absurd if not remarkable.

Think about all the men working on the oil rig, the technician working in the smelting factory (or whatever you call a plastic molding plant) the men driving the semitruck and all the other laborers that go into making this thing. Are you saying that a couple of seconds of your time and some soap isn't worth all that time and effort? I'm not saying it is or isn't, but I believe the whole point is to question the economic model.

[–]redrockmullet 2 points3 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

However, you're not taking into account that the spoon was made from the leftovers of the refining process. The oil was drilled and shipped primarily to create usable fuels like gasoline, diesel, kerosene and etc. The spoon was made out of otherwise useless byproducts. The creater of the image fallaciously assumed that all the effort of drilling and shipping and processing was to just make spoons. By creating an object of intrinsic value the utinsel manufacturer did us the service of adding convenience out of an otherwise harmful mass of leftover sludge. Also, the spoon can be recycled... provided the person using it doesn't just toss it in the trash.

[–]hacksoncode 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It takes milliseconds of all those people's time to produce 1 spoon (most of the hard work is done by machine anyway). So yes, it's not worth a minute of my time to save milliseconds of a bunch of other people's time.

Human beings have only one real lasting advantage over other animals: we specialize. And yes, it's incredibly remarkable. A crowning achievement of civilization, one might say.

If we're going to single out plastic spoons, I'd say we're wasting our energy (as well as real energy... this conversation probably cost 1000s of plastic spoons when all is told). There are far more important things to decry about civilization's effects. Think about that the next time you have salmon with mango chutney.

Anyway, if we weren't using all that oil for other stuff, plastic spoons would be considerably more expensive, and the calculation might or might not go the other way. However, the costs for all those other things we're using oil for can only legitimately be charged to those other things. Like shipping mangos half way across the world for dinner.

[–]srs_house 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

But you're also helping to pay the wages of all of those people when you buy these cheap plastic spoons. Plus metal is at a premium right now because of developing countries (like China) using so much, so metal silverware will be more expensive, so you pay more when you go to places like fast food, which almost always use plastic.

tl;dr: it's complicated shit.

[–]amc178 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

remember you are making a lot of spoons, not just one. not to mention all the other things that you make out of plastic (medical equipment, your computer etc) that have higher value than a spoon.

[–]third_thought 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

there is a slight shift towards the internalisation of external costs (or, if you prefer, reshifting the burden of pollution off society in general back onto users and producers) by the use of carbon pollution reduction schemes. america doesn't seem to want one though. figures.

[–]Vik1ng 1 point2 points ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Are there any countries besides America that use that much disposable cutlery? Because here in Europa my experience is, that it is mostly used at fast-food restaurants, parties or camping ... I know you can arguee there too, but seriously why would you use it in a hotal or a cafeteria, where you bring back your cutlery and they have a big kitchen to clean it? I'm mean they even used paper plates at some places there ...

[–]standerby 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is so true. I spent a week in the states and used more plastic/paper cutlery and plates then I probably have in my life. Infact, I can remember using a single coffee mug in the morning and the odd-occasion was served with an actual plate. All the other times were those red-cups and plastic plates. Plastic stuff is so rare here that clubs have started to throw "red-cup nights" where they serve all drinks in those American red cups and it actually ATTRACTS people to the club because they've never seen them in real life before.

[–]whut 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

When you realize that this is one of the strengths of capitalism, then you'll finally understand capitalism

[–]NeonBeige 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I have an aunt that I used to visit when I was little. She would buy paper plates and plastic silverware just so she wouldn't have to do dishes.

The amount of laziness from people who simply can't wash a dish is mind-boggling.

[–]stigmata07 2 points3 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Why should one waste time washing dishes when there is so little time and only one reddit?

[–]zpinter 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This reminds me of my grandma complaining about restaurants and how "nobody cooks a meal at home anymore." Or people who can't understand why others pay $30 for an oil change instead of doing it themselves.

The point is: time is limited. If a person finds the cost of paper/plastic worth it for the couple hours a month saved from not washing dishes, who cares?

[–]Teh_Slayur 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If a person finds the cost of paper/plastic worth it for the couple hours a month saved from not washing dishes, who cares?

I care. The only reason it seems cost effective is that capitalism externalizes costs. Corporations treat natural resources as a free gift of nature, to be used up wantonly, and they treat the Earth as a pollution sink and a garbage dump.

[–]inappropriatehumor 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Clean water is more precious then oil.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

With enough oil you can make clean water.

[–]AlexanderSalamander 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

If someone else is getting paid for doing it, then obviously that will be preferable to doing it myself for free. Not saying it's 'right', but it's what happens.

[–]ralree 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Think of all the water savings!

[–]TankRizzo 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I HATE plastic spoons...they're too deep and just feel all wrong.

[–]wytbyt 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Am I the only one that has washed plastic cutlery because I didn't have proper silverware?

[–]californiarepublik 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

with oil at $105/barrel, it will not remain so cheap for long, better enjoy your plastic spoons while you can

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

....We cannot eliminate these entirely, what about parties or group gatherings? I have maybe 10-12 Spoon, forks, etc.

[–]UrbanToiletShrimp 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

GIVE ME CONVENIENCE OR GIVE ME DEATH!

[–]shadowspawn 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I keep those. Doesn't anyone else? I just throw them in an orange bag and toss them in the dishwasher. I have a few boxes full of sterile, clean, plastic utensils.

[–]Pooters 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Who the fuck uses plastic spoons?

[–]minamhere 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I'm pretty sure the purpose of plastic spoons is not to avoid washing metal spoons, but to avoid throwing metal spoons away at work. All the effort to create a plastic spoon IS less effort than remembering to bring a dirty spoon home to get washed.

[–]EtherealDragon 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

There is no perfect system. Economics is a matter of the lesser of the evils. The fact that we need currency to get along in the first place is kind of a sad statement.

[–]KombatKid 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I keep those and wash those.

/poor

[–]erkapathy 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I would wash that and reuse it until the handle breaks. Then, I recycle.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is why I carry silverware in my backpack.

[–]Bipolarruledout 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_destruction

Oh, and also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality

Which tends to cause things like:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisphenol_A

I could go on but this is mostly due to our inability to understand:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_systems

The point is that everything has consequences which are not always immediately apparent. See also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

[–]OptimalPirate 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Because metal spoons and soap spontaneously came into being. Yep.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is why i only use paper products!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

[–]Arkangyal 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Damn, I literally threw out a plastic spoon 5 seconds before looking at this post.

[–]reedatschool 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It is amazing that anyone would defend our wastefulness. We produce more garbage here in the US on average than anywhere else in the world. We throw away 2.5 million plastic bottles every hour but there is nothing to look at here riiight?

http://sparksgoinggreen.blogspot.com/2009/07/america-is-queen-of-trash.html

Seriously though everyone who is being sarcastic or trying to bust the posters balls needs to open their eyes and take a look around. We cannot sustain our disposable culture and it is only benefiting an extreme minority at the cost of everyones future.

[–]nigrochinkspic 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

According to who? Don't just state shit and expect everyone to agree with you. ESPECIALLY on reddit.

[–]sundjub 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Metal spoons appear out of thin air and have no costs associated with production.

[–]metaphase 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It's a convincing argument sure, but these are needed, not always but sometimes yes. They cost less than buying metal and can be recycled, if only a better plastic were to be used like a bio-plastic, but yes I would say these are important at times.

[–]Lavasoup 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Our grandparents were green long before it entered the popular lexicon.Milk bottles anyone?

[–]010011000111 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The good thing about capitalism is that you have a choice.

Now I wonder how much energy was spent mining the metals from the ground, melting them down, shaping them, and transporting them, and how much fresh water is poured down the drain after every wash?

I understand where you are coming from, but you are not honestly offering up all the relevant variables.

[–]jcloud240 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

amen..

[–]Harinezumi 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Economies of scale: they work, bitches!

[–]chazferrari 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

When I have more people over to my place than I have silverware, I'm not going to go out and buy more silverware.

[–]allocater 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

after all these smart ass responses did anybody actually calculate what's the better way?!

[–]Sky_Prodigy 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

THERE IS NO SPOON

[–]DX282 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Anyone I see using plastic cutlery, I will punch them in the face.

[–]ForseenSeraph 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

The worst thing I have heard out of the capitalist mentality is "I don't know how to fix <repairable item>, I will just buy a new one." it's bad enough that this failing economic system has brought "planned obsolecense" to items that were once designed to last decades instead of lasting til the next upgrade or just after the crappy warranty runs out.

[–]ullshalk 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Ctrl+F steal

Maybe it's because people steal or accidentally throw away metal spoons. This is why we can't have nice things.

[–]dafakin 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Reusing plastic spoons? Man...I use my hands...

[–]baddna7 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Especially when you needed a fork.

[–]ionracas 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

I am absolutely dumbfounded at all of the comments here justifying using disposable spoons. Rage, rage against the washing of the spoons!

Seriously, America, this is why the rest of the world thinks you're wasteful idiots. You defend this. You defend living like swine in your own waste.

[–]Vik1ng 1 point2 points ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

This is a bit exaggerated, but you got a point there. In Europa even the customers would start wondering what this is if you use disposable spoons it in a hotel or other places where it doesn't seem necessary.

[–]Antares42 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

You get plastic cutlery in hotels in the U.S.?

[–]Vik1ng 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

At least I was at a big one were this was the case (you would drop you tray afterwards like at McDonalds as they also got paper plates) and it was part of a big hotel chain. Rest of the time I was at the house of my friends and haven't been at any other hotels, so i can't say how common this is. On the other side I have never ever got plastic cutlery in any European hotel.

[–]Antares42 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Classy.

[–]toastermcgee 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

What free marketeers don't get is that it WILL be paid for - but by future generations. To ban plastic spoons isn't the solution. In my view, taxing "negative externalities" is the only way to fix it. A plastic spoon tax would mean that only people that really need them - and aren't just lazy - would buy them. I think of it this way... humans have poor self control, and we need measures in place that make bad behaviour hard - but not impossible (that's dangerous).

I'll explain using my "bowl of nuts theory". Imagine you're hosting a dinner party and you put a big bowl of nuts on the table before dinner. They're delicious, and everybody can't resist eating handful after handful. Now of course you don't want them to spoil their appetite, but these nuts are so damn good and they can't control their impulses. What's the solution? Rather than put the nuts away, just put them on the shelf just away from the table. So now if you really want nuts you have to get up from the table - and it's pretty unlikely that you will unless you're starving hungry.

Unfortunately free market ideology doesn't see it this way and our pricing structures all too often reward bad behaviour (ie cheap junk food, plastic spoons, ridiculously cheap petrol etc etc)

[–]Godd2 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

How do future generations pay for my oil waste? By not having plastic spoons to use? But you're advocating that people of today use fewer spoons (perhaps none at all).

Does it really matter whether we use it or future people use it?

[–]daveime 0 points1 point ago*

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

Just wash the spoon when you're done with it.

When 1.1 billion people lack even potable drinking water, it's sanctimonious shit like this that makes my blood boil.

What about the infrastructure needed to first obtain the water, purify it (including all the chemical production, shipping and handling), transport (including enough copper and plastic pipe you could circle the Earth FSM knows how many times), pumps, motors, electricity etc etc, not to mention the chemicals and all the other shit needed to make the washing up liquid, just so you can simply "wash the spoon".

Bullshit posts like these serve no useful purpose, other than to demonstrate you are yet another armchair environmentalist, who hasn't got the thought necessary to understand the infrastructure and resources that went into the "easy half" of your comparison.

[–]troubledparent 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

It is interesting that the author does not consider the capitalism required to have the water appear in the sink. To have dishwashing soap handy for use. Or even the process necessary to have a towel available to dry the spoon. And, of course, the consumer's labor is free as well.

I consider this a shining example of why capitalism inherently succeeds while other methods of controlling the market fail.

[–]axilmar 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

While I see the point of this, the author of the picture should have in mind that all the effort he describes goes into many more products than a spoon. Plastic items like a spoon are only one of the thousands of products produced from oil. The cost of extraction, refinery etc is spread across all the product spectrum.

Furthermore, is the cost of washing the spoon really minimal or even less than the cost of producing the spoon in the first place? washing a spoon requires water and chemicals to clean it.

The chemicals used in cleaning the water come from oil too.

The water used to clean the spoon is extracted using machines that are moved by oil products. The water is also purified using chemicals that are also oil products.

[–]cerialthriller 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

so do you guys like actually pack up silverware and carry it around with you, just incase you stop for some ice cream or get take out sometime? Then carry that dirty silverware around with you all day until you get home so you can clean it and then put it back into your pocket for the next time you happen to stop somewhere?

[–]shark615 0 points1 point ago

sorry, this has been archived and can no longer be voted on

right because metal spoons grow on trees in our back yards and require no mining, smelting, shipping, shaping or buying