top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]Jay_Normous 352 points353 points ago

As my dad always says, never underestimate someone's capacity to totally fuck you over.

[–]BlockMaster 22 points23 points ago

Good advice, fits into most things in life. The other day my English teacher lost half of my assessment papers and so I barely managed to scrape a C grade with the 2/5 papers she marked. I'm being forced to resit it and I don't even know what I wrote anymore. So much rage.

[–]Jay_Normous 6 points7 points ago

He works with government agencies a lot, so he makes sure he spells out exactly what he needs, exactly what they need to do, and exactly when it needs to be done by, then proceeds to do as much as he can to get the process going himself.

Someone without experience with government workers might be like, "oh well i told them what I needed, they should do it right?" Wrong. Never underestimate the capacity for someone to fuck you over. Hold their hand as much as possible if you have to.

[–]Golden161 139 points140 points ago

[–]omg_guize 36 points37 points ago

Mmm hmm.

[–]Sketch3000 149 points150 points ago

I had a professor that hated group projects - he liked them only from the standpoint that they do exactly what your chart shows, you can't count on others to come through for you.

One day in 90 minute class, he started off the day explaining his dislike for group projects and why they don't work. After a short 20 minute lecture he said, I want to throw two scenarios out and have the class split into two groups. I forget the actual situations he gave, but I'll make up my own that get the point across.

Would you rather live in a world where it rained gummy bears or it rained gummy worms. Stand on this side for worms, this side for bears.

Now, explain your cases to each other and as soon everyone agrees on one type of rain you can all leave class. Mind you this was getting out almost an hour early.

Those fuckers refused to cooperate - I specifically remember saying "everyone just stand in the middle and agree that we all agree, let's go home" We left class about 5 minutes early, not because we could cooperate, but because it was obvious the teacher was tired of the experiment.

[–]Making_Bacon 120 points121 points ago

Gummy worms is clearly the superior option.

[–]buddhassynapse 44 points45 points ago

Bears. Less mass and surface area means it hurts less when thousands of bears are raining on you during a storm.

[–]exaltedbladder 25 points26 points ago

Fuck that, more surface area means more contact with your tongue means more of that gummy goodness

[–]shibblywibbly 28 points29 points ago

What good is that if you're in a bunch of pain?

Could you fucking take this seriously please? I'd like to get out of here early. This isn't goddamn 12 Angry Men.

[–]exaltedbladder 13 points14 points ago

Step 1: Learn to umbrella

Step 2: Flip it inside out

Step 3: Realize when you get to your destination that you now have a huge amount of goddamn gummy worms

[–]belovedcye 6 points7 points ago

If you increase the surface area, assuming the same mass, then it should actually hurt less. Physics!

edit: kind of like a needle. the point has less surface area than paper, so it hurts more for the needle to press you than it does for the paper, even if they are the same mass.

[–]Doctor_Insano_PhD 55 points56 points ago

Gummy bears is clearly the superior option.

[–]A_Crippling_Blowjob 15 points16 points ago

That is insane, I don't know how you got your PhD.

[–]The_Ecstatic_X 3 points4 points ago

Unfortunately, it probably had something to do with a crippling blowjob

[–]lexpeebo 852 points853 points ago

don't forget - if you want shit done right, do it yourself.

[–]therealdjbc 366 points367 points ago

Exactly- assume you are working alone, because those lazy bastards will SINK you

[–]JimboMcGirt 146 points147 points ago

As someone who ends up doing it all himself anyways, it has become instinct once I see the word "group" on the syllabus to think this.

[–]polarisdelta 147 points148 points ago

What it also means is that you have to hide what you are doing from your peers, lest they "improve" it.

[–]Misc_Rodriguez 93 points94 points ago

Or try to take credit for it.

[–]fiffers 68 points69 points ago

Once I did a group project where the other three students completely slacked the fuck off, so I spent all night the night before getting their shit in order and basically feeding them all the information for their section. I ended up focusing so much on them and neglecting myself that they got a better grade than me. I was pissed the fuck off at those mooching sons of bitches.

I like to think it was some kind of meta lesson on the problems of collective action—a key idea in the class.

[–]MNorthey71 54 points55 points ago

One thing I learned is DON'T TAKE THIS BULLSHIT FROM THE START. Had a computer process control class with two guys that weren't doing anything in my group. Then they showed up at a lab, 3/4 the way through our project, and the one guy asks me "What's this?" as he points at the paper. I proceeded to tell him if he fucking came to class he would know, and that he obviously isn't ready for this project. This argument went on in a computer room full of people including the TA, who I promptly asked over and told him about the situation. He allowed me to continue the project on my own (more work, but already was doing it all) and said he would be slightly lenient marking it based on me doing all the work.

Well I couldn't have been happier.

While me and my disbanded teammates had to use the same set of process control data (did the labs together originally), I ended passing the class with an A- (getting 97% on midterm and final), the best grade I got in any chemical engineering class, while they failed the project, and subsequently the class :)

[–]onandonagain 13 points14 points ago

I love happy endings.

[–]MNorthey71 11 points12 points ago

Seeing your douchenozzle ex-teammates fail = Priceless

[–]Un_Owen2 7 points8 points ago

Shit that really sucks, I try to help everyone but if they don't put any effort I just do my part and don't give a fuck about the rest.

[–]Rottendog 20 points21 points ago

When I was in college in Physics. I had a 99% average in class. Most of my the time when we had group projects, the same group of 3 or 4 of us would group together and we had a system worked out where we all "generally" pulled the same amount of weight and we were pretty much assured an A.

Until the one time that the professor decided that he would make us switch up the groups. I got saddled with a moron, a guy who tried, but couldn't grasp the concepts, and a lazy bitch who IF she showed up, never even tried to participate.

When all was done, me and the guy who tried did all the work. I put together another "A" paper. I turned it in fully expecting another "A". I was called to the professor's office after the papers were graded and I was handed an "F". When I asked why, I was told it was because I cheated. Then the professor handed me another groups paper, to my disbelief, there was my paper, word for word, typos included, with the other groups names on top.

When I tried to defend myself I was told I was a cheater and I broke honor code. This pissed me off, because Every single project or test in class I had straight "A" marks, and the professor thought I was the one cheating.

After a weeks of investigation and an honor board where multiple people had to testify on, it turned out that "lazy bitch" gave a copy of our work to her boyfriend who used it. And even when confronted his whole group tried to claim it as their own. The professor believed them over me (us - being fair, the guy who tried did help, and the other guy, the "moron", did at least show up) as they were, shall we say, of the more popular community.

This was in the earlier days of computers and I was able provide proof in the dates of my files that were created, which not everyone at that time was aware existed, coupled with all of my notes and hard data, which the others couldn't provide.

TL;DR; Years later, the lesson I took, if you want the project done right, do it yourself, back everything up, expect others to try and claim credit, and expect your boss not to give a shit who did it.

[–]Misc_Rodriguez 1 point2 points ago

Very similar to one of my own experiences (in this case the two people were frat brothers). To this day I am extremely wary of working with other people on anything.

[–]you-faggot 12 points13 points ago

"Give me your notes so I can put it together tonight" - me before I throw away all their unreadable shit work and do it all myself on every group project ever

I'm an asshole, AMA

[–]whats_the_deal22 45 points46 points ago

As a procrastinator, it has become my instinct to realize that out of a group of 4, there will be at least one other person that thinks just like you.

[–]djbummy 5 points6 points ago

As long as you get your shit done I really don't care :/

[–]DMercenary 2 points3 points ago

Trust No One.

Its a pleasant surprise that the other guy did his part too.

[–]shibblywibbly 0 points1 point ago

You really should. Procrastination is often the difference between bare minimum, and good.

[–]shmere4 28 points29 points ago

One time I had a group project to build a bridge by defining the length of all the spereate members making up the bridge. We had to figure out the best way to do this and then make a model out of wooden pieces based on our analysis. My group had four people in it, two hadnt hardly shown up to class since the mid term and the third repeatedly told me how he was a different kind of engineer and shouldnt have to do this work bc its boring. So naturally I did all the work, and had the thing done maybe a few days before it was due. The last part was writing a paper, I worte it mostly but gave one section to the bitchy kid bc he claimed I wasnt keeping him involved. He puts it off until the day its due but promises to give me his part at a certain time before our class so I could incorporate it. The time comes and he's a no show. I had to track him down in another class where he explained "I had it all done I swear but I went to save it and it all was deleted!" Ive really never been so close to murdering someone.

But wait there is more, prior to the bitchy kid pissing me off the other two classmates decided they wanted to get involved.... The night before the project that took most of the semester was due. They did this by calling my phone over 40 times. I left it charging in my room and didn't hear it ringing while I was away. Anyway they called again after I saw this and asked when we should meet up for our group project... fml. They also showed up for the presentation and watched the bitchy kid and I defend our design but never said anything.

Tl; dr: if you're a teacher who likes to give group projects, please go to hell first bc that's where you're sending your students.

[–]BeanDom 11 points12 points ago

This is why i NEVER EVER give group projects to my students. I don't give a flying fuck what my colleuages have to say about it.

[–]Mylon 2 points3 points ago

Group projects seem like a great idea. But there has to be someone that is the dedicated project lead and they have to act like a manager. Putting 4 people together with no hierarchy in place is asking for anarchy.

[–]Forgot_password_shit 19 points20 points ago

"This is going to be a group proj-"

"Sir! Can I do mine alone?"

[–]infinitum17 276 points277 points ago

This is why I, in all my years of teaching, have never assigned a group project. Every year I inform the students that I am philosophically opposed to them and why. You know you're doing something right as a teacher when all the responsible kids think it's a great idea but all the lazy-ass little shits get this look of panic on their faces.

[–]Apokilipse 74 points75 points ago

Bless you...

[–]morechatter 39 points40 points ago

I wish every school had someone like you review curriculums. (Is that even a word?)

[–]infinitum17 50 points51 points ago

I happen to teach Latin, and curriculum is a Latin word! The Latin plural is "curricula" (it's a 2nd declension neuter), but there's nothing wrong with using an English pluralization, since the word has been fully adopted by English.

[–]darkaxe 12 points13 points ago

"The more you know"

[–]ferrarisnowday 35 points36 points ago

but all the lazy-ass little shits get this look of panic on their faces.

I'm a lazy little shit who still hates group projects. I don't want someone to do my work for me, but I also don't want to be pestered to do the work 2 weeks in advance. I prefer solo work because I'll get to it when I get to it.

[–]infinitum17 20 points21 points ago

Thank you for explaining another reason why group projects suck. I was a huge procrastinator in school, too. You, however, do not belong to the group of kids that I'm talking about when I say lazy-ass little shits. These are kids who never get any of the project done, and then act all helpless and upset when you ask them why they didn't do anything.

[–]ferrarisnowday 16 points17 points ago

I understand, just wanted to point it out. I'm actually in grad school now, and I work full time but some of my group members do not. They are getting annoyed with me because I don't check my e-mail while I'm at work and I don't do much school work except on the weekend. That's just how it works for me, and I hate being judged for it, but I refuse to make my weekdays even tougher so they'll just have to deal with it.

[–]grubas 5 points6 points ago

Grad school group projects are an utter shitshow. One of my classes is having one right now, none of us can schedule a meeting, none of us have free time to figure it out as a group, and one person is bitching at all of us for not planning ahead.

[–]Astrognome 5 points6 points ago

99% of my homework is done within an hour of class starting. Procrastination makes perfect.

[–]BeanDom 8 points9 points ago

Another teacher here. I do the same, and to hell with the consequences. (You are not giving the students the chance to collaberate, yada yada yada...)

[–]internetsuperstar 16 points17 points ago

It kinda sucks though because school is supposed to train you for real life, which is basically one big group project with shitty partners.

[–]Torger083 5 points6 points ago

Exactly. You learn to trust no one.

[–]PrimeIntellect 4 points5 points ago

You should definitely get people to do group work, just don't make it an insane project work half your grade

[–]MNorthey71 15 points16 points ago

Having worked on two engineering design project with the same group, consisting of myself (caucasian stoner), a quiet version of myself (caucasian), a PhD version of myself who loves heavy metal and hair to match (caucasian), an over-dresser with a 50s view of women (persian), and a hardcore Starcraft gamer (korean), I can safely say that not all groups mesh well. Can you guess who the sinker was?

[–]dirtythrowaway47 34 points35 points ago

The sinker was the Asian. Pearl Harbor makes that obvious.

[–]MNorthey71 2 points3 points ago

I love you and your racial jokes.

[–]disptr -1 points0 points ago

Too soon.

[–]infinitum17 14 points15 points ago

definitely the persian over-dresser with a 50s view of women.

[–]MNorthey71 7 points8 points ago

DING DING DING DING DING!

[–]infinitum17 4 points5 points ago

I can't understand why other people not only hadn't guessed it already, but why it wasn't the very first guess. Seemed so obvious!

[–]MNorthey71 18 points19 points ago

Ya, so did I.

He basically covered some report writing and some of the economics (because all he cares about is money) He is a very VERY stereotypical Persian, including the degrading views of women, over dressing EVERYDAY, driving a BMW that his rich parents bought, etc, I could go on for awhile. He did basically none of the mathematics, modelling, or calculations, but good dammit if he isn't a great public speaker (i.e. good at persuasion, bullshitting, and being charismatic).

BTW "bullshitting" is apparently a real word, as no spelling correction red line arose once typed. TIL

[–]infinitum17 4 points5 points ago

[–]All_Sham_No_WOW 3 points4 points ago

This... is magical.

[–]Azerua 14 points15 points ago

The hardcore starcraft gamer? He'll be too busy!

[–]Azathfeld 5 points6 points ago

You, obv.

[–]MNorthey71 7 points8 points ago

Surprisingly, no, but I did set myself to get the finger pointed at, didn't I?

[–]Lame-Duck 2 points3 points ago

As an engineering grad I will go with the korean. We had a senior design group for our final project and got to choose our own groups. It went quite well until one of our group members decided to get engaged and look to buy a house with her fiance during the end of the semester... She edited the entire (130 page) report so we gave her a pass on pretty much everything else. We got a 98 on the presentation and an unprecedented 100 on the report.

[–]MNorthey71 4 points5 points ago

Nope...(why does everyone think the korean? Asians are awesome at engineering)

[–]Rhakan 2 points3 points ago

I'm guessing the stoner.

Edit: grammar.

[–]Benj1105 2 points3 points ago

raises hand pick me I know the answer!

ITS ALWAYS THE OVERDRESSER

[–]dynamicweight 2 points3 points ago

I say the Persian. I'd never trust a well dressed engineer. (I understand over-dressed is not well dressed but anything more than jeans and a collared shirt is suspicious)

[–]Second_Foundationeer 3 points4 points ago

You.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]hogie276 3 points4 points ago

wtf, ok just tell me then man it's teamwork. if were on the same team and you wanna do all the work, fine by me. don't forget to write me some note cards so I know what I'll be talking about in front of class

[–]cuemusicandlights 2 points3 points ago

I feel offended. Lazy bastards have feelings too.

[–]akatherder 53 points54 points ago

As I get older, I find more and more that this should be "If you want shit done your way, do it yourself."

There are varying levels and definitions of "right".

[–]MajorVictory 24 points25 points ago

This is why I go to Burger King.

[–]Xx420xcirclejerker69 10 points11 points ago

Nice try, burger king rep.

[–]samisbond 3 points4 points ago

Right mean an A or what your boss likes.

[–]Rphenom 113 points114 points ago

"If you want something done to your standards do it yourself because no one else can see what the fuck you're thinking."

[–]Flurven 62 points63 points ago

That's where the "communication" part factors in.

[–]ual002 58 points59 points ago

This part here is where I feel like there is a disconnect between how much I communicate and how many fucks the person I'm communicating with gives.

[–]MintyChaos 23 points24 points ago

Exactly, the more I try to explain to someone what I'd like to do, the more they seem to think "hmmm, this seems like work I'm not going to do."

[–]xxfay6 6 points7 points ago

Or "Nah, it's for 2 weeks. Ignore"

[–]JabbrWockey 4 points5 points ago

There's usually a cost-benefit analysis here.

Is the time spent educating someone on this going to take longer than me just doing it?

[–]Accidental_Ouroboros 28 points29 points ago

My experience was more along the lines of:

"If you want something done to your standards do it yourself because no one else can see what the fuck you're thinking will."

It was not a question of people producing shit work, a question of people producing any shit at all.

[–]Rhakan 19 points20 points ago

Exactly. The difference between group projects in college and group projects in the workplace is that employees are expected to produce quality work whereas students are expected to produce work of any quality for grading and to learn in the process.

In the workplace if a team member is blowing off meetings, not doing their work, not communicating, or otherwise being unreliable then they get the boot. In college if a team member is doing the same thing then they fail the course, but they can't be removed regardless of how poorly they perform because they wouldn't have the opportunity to learn from their mistakes. As a result, student teams are often required to drag enormous amounts of dead weight around. Occasionally you'll get a slacker in the workplace, but never is the problem as severe as in college.

Furthermore, employees are paid to work a set schedule. Students aren't being paid at all and they don't have any kind of similar schedule. Often times each individual student on the team might have 8 hours a day that they're available, but there are only 5 hours per week where everyone is available at the same time. This complicates things somewhat.

Not to mention the convoluted and nonsensical grading schemes that professors come up with. Often times your grade in the course is based on your team's performance as a whole. In the workplace, this shit doesn't fly. If everyone on the team says "hey boss, Jim is a fucking slacker, we need him gone" then Jim is gone and you don't have to worry about him hampering your performance. If, however, everyone on the team says "hey professor, Jim is a fucking slacker, we need him gone" then Jim stays on and your grade is still based, in part, on his shitty performance.

[–]ExpiredDustyMuffin 5 points6 points ago

I've had professors that allowed the team to effectively fire members as long as everyone else agreed unanimously, up until the halfway mark of the project being due. The look on a slacker's face when they received their death sentence was priceless.

[–]antigenabx 16 points17 points ago

Also don't forget: COVER YOUR ASS.

[–]TheNextStep21 3 points4 points ago

I wear pants most days, does that count?

[–]antigenabx 5 points6 points ago

Haha. What counts is documenting everything. I didn't during the first group project, and it sucked. During the second, I posted the agreements made at every meeting on the discussion board that the prof could see. I would also post at the deadlines to say whose work I had received and whose work I hadn't. People still fucked me over, but I had thorough proof of everything and it helped my marks.

[–]LucasSatie 4 points5 points ago

Sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn't. I had a professor just last term who said flat out that he didn't care if everyone slacked off. The group got one shared grade. Everyone slacked off but you? Too bad, so sad.

[–]masonsbro 5 points6 points ago

Unless someone else wants it done right too, and you say you'll handle everything, then they don't know if you really will. It could lead to a lot of stress for everyone if one person tries to do everything just to ensure that it's done right.

[–]Koin3190 3 points4 points ago

if you want shit done right, partner with the smart kid in your class

[–]rmh86 4 points5 points ago

We had a group project when I was second year of uni. Wasn't a huge project but still worth a bit.

It was around designing a spreadsheet for a manufacturing company. The spreadsheet itself was worth something like 40% of the project. We had to write a report on it as well - that was 15% or something. The rest was made up of a 10 minute Q&A with the lecturer, where he marked each individual member on their understanding and working knowledge of the spreadsheet / report.

Needless to say, I was grouped up with a bunch of wasters and ended up pretty much doing the spreadsheet and report for the team. That got everybody a near 40% without lifting a finger.

When it came to the Q&A - he scored me 100% meaning I scored an 80 whilst everyone else failed the project. He said he gave me a full 100 because it was evident no one else had even viewed the spreadsheet until that day.

[–]SavageGarden 37 points38 points ago

The key to a good group project is to rapidly establish a totalitarian dictatorship.

[–]lastlambda 3 points4 points ago

I do this every time, to all those pushing the bullshit life lessons argument, I got my life lesson, become the leader through whatever means necessary so no fuck ups happen because you weren't in control.

[–]LNMagic 70 points71 points ago

The key to a good group is organization. Someone has to step up to the plate and assign roles. A good way to do that is to break it into sections and ask group members to each take an equal share. When I did that, I spent lots of time formatting in Word (along with an active table of contents) to make it even easier to find the sections. It's a way of helping the team without overstepping your bounds. I didn't do that in every group, but it's a good skill to possess. The result is that most of my group projects have been positive experiences.

There were times when someone didn't pull their weight, but because we were organized and tried to stick to a schedule, the rest of us were aware of it and addressed the problem each time. I can deal with someone who has difficulty with the subject but is making an honest effort - in that case, most groups will spend time helping them learn. It's harder to convince someone who's lazy to do their part.

[–]darkpaladin 44 points45 points ago

Honestly, I'd say less about organization than leadership. Taking my college experiences into the real world (where group projects actually work) 9 times out of 10 the reason something fails is either because they're no clear leader or the leader working on the project is weak.

[–]treycook 21 points22 points ago

A good leader is often a good organizer. :)

[–]Mumbling-Dolphin 20 points21 points ago

My advice, ALWAYS TAKE THE LEADERSHIP ROLE! Don't say, "ok I'm the leader," but be the first one to get everyones email and names and phone numbers then email them what needs to get done. PLUS, you get to delegate shit that needs to get done.

[–]Rich_Cheese 9 points10 points ago

In one off my labs last semester nothing was getting done so I got pissed and started assigning people to different parts of the labs. I was shocked at how much more work got done. Its also nice because i got to pick for myself what i was going to do.

[–]devrdander 10 points11 points ago

Some management advise for you, this may work ok in one time groups but ongoing giving yourself the good jobs and the shitty jobs to others will earn you resentment. Its a good idea to show you're willing to do the shitty parts from time to time to earn respect from your subordinates.

edit: Also taking the first shitty job means you can easily buck the second one to come along and they can do little to gripe since they didn't want to do the first one.

[–]gsfgf 1 point2 points ago

I was wondering how far down this thread I was gonna have to go to find the people that actually understand how to do group work.

[–]Parthenonn 3 points4 points ago

Amen. The secret is people management.

[–]raskolnikov- 195 points196 points ago

I'm pretty sure that I've seen this before but I'm going to upvote it anyway so maybe a professor somewhere sees it and thinks twice about assigning a group project. I got a D on a group project in college because my partner did not do her part and lied to me, saying she had it under control. I did not learn until an hour or so before it was due that she hadn't done anything except badly copy a passage from our textbook and try to pass it off as her writing. In parts, her writing was utterly nonsensical. I explained it to the professor but he was not sympathetic.

[–]syriquez 51 points52 points ago

Your professor already knows. They went through college, too. It's to teach you that you are 100% required to force shit to get done so you 100% know that it's getting done.

Welcome to project management!

[–]vinfx 22 points23 points ago

The college project is not perfectly analogous to corporate projects. In college, a lazy worker will sink the entire team. The students can complain about a non-contributing teammate but nothing is done. They are all punished. However, at a job the teammates complain to management and the lazy teammate gets shifted to another project, demoted, or fired. The lazy worker is punished.

(And don't give me nonsense about lazy workers hiding out in large I.T. corporations. For the most part, that's a myth.)

[–]syriquez 8 points9 points ago

They are all punished. However, at a job the teammates complain to management and the lazy teammate gets shifted to another project, demoted, or fired. The lazy worker is punished.
(And don't give me nonsense about lazy workers hiding out in large I.T. corporations. For the most part, that's a myth.)

What magical fairy tale book do you live in? There is a reason why Dilbert is popular.

[–]JoelLikesPigs 44 points45 points ago

Programming course - I got two Asian students and a French student, all three could barely write legible English for our report. None of them could code, one could animate...badly and they could never show up on time for anything. I ended up doing the entire project myself - writing the 6k report and creating the application, the entire time the group complained saying how much work they where doing. When in the end I gave them sheets to colour in.

TL;DR: FUCK GROUP PROJECTS

[–]b0w3n 13 points14 points ago

Do the whole project yourself, on project day hand in, let the professor collect what you and your group were supposed to do when it was doled out. When he's done collecting, bring up the rest of the project with your name on it and go "Since I thought my group was going to flake, here's the rest of the report."

[–]Keitaro_Urashima 26 points27 points ago

See, you think this would work no problem, but I've had professors who will give you an F (or at least your group) because you did not coordinate and communicate effectively, and you didn't properly assign roles and just did everything yourself... professors can be shit sometimes.

[–]b0w3n 18 points19 points ago

The proper response to this is jump up on their desk, grab the side of their face with your hands, and shit right in front of them while undulating like Xena.

Honest to goodness.

[–]Keitaro_Urashima 2 points3 points ago

gonna assert my dominance hard fuck yea

[–]mknyan 2 points3 points ago

Way to make me laugh in the middle of a class talking about cancer.

[–]JoelLikesPigs 4 points5 points ago

I mailed my tutor at the time asking if the rest of the group can be removed from "my" group, or at least be graded with a smaller percentage. He told me he wouldn't and that this was just something to expect when working with people - I argued if I had a job doing something like this I imagine they would at least show up to work or have basic English and writing skills. No dice. Got a first though - shame they did too.

[–]PizzaGood 156 points157 points ago

Honestly, I believe that the profs know this perfectly well. It's a life lesson. Even when you get into the job market, make sure you have believable proof that your partners are pulling their weight, and do something about it if they are not. An F hurts, getting fired hurts worse. The boss may not care "whose fault it is."

[–]worldDev 37 points38 points ago

I recently took a $10k hit when someone pulled the same shit on a contract job... I'm not glad I learned that lesson the hard way as I am now broke.

[–]ptboi42 14 points15 points ago

What exactly did they pull?

[–]Rhakan 13 points14 points ago

The boss may not care "whose fault it is."

Teams in the workplace do not work like teams in college. In the workplace team members are not equals. There's one manager responsible for making sure that everyone is working. No team member could say "don't worry, I've got it" without providing updates with substance to justify that statement. It will become quite apparent that one team member is not pulling their weight and they'll be canned.

Also, do you really think that a company wants to simply fire everyone involved? Of course not. Then they'd have to hire and train a bunch of people to replace them. They're going to figure out whose fault it is so that they only have to replace one or two people, not an entire group.

[–]mrthedon 5 points6 points ago

Honestly, I believe that the profs know this perfectly well.

Good Guy Professor: Sets you up to get screwed over on a class project so you're prepared for it on a work project.

[–]zeroes0 10 points11 points ago

Twist: He's tenured and is only teaching the course to meet his requirement so he can get back to his research. No fucks are given about you.

[–]DMercenary 5 points6 points ago

Doubletwist: He's actually a psychology researcher and is studying how human behavior responds to forced collaboration. You are, in fact, his research!

[–]raskolnikov- 43 points44 points ago

I can see that, I guess, but I really don't think that was going through the professor's mind.

And like, in my case I didn't know my partner until we were assigned to work together. I didn't know where she lived, I didn't work with her. A week before it's due, I say,"how's it going," and she says "fine." A day before it's due, I say, "can I see it," she says "no it's fine." The morning it's due, I ask again, and she finally shows me her plagiarized garbage an hour before its due. I tell her not to turn it in and we need to talk to the professor, she turns it in anyway with both our names on it. I mean, I suppose I could have tracked her down somehow and burst down the door, or I could have contacted the professor early and said "I'm worried about my partner," but I'm not sure professors really want that. And the professor wasn't really interested in my story after the fact. What I could have done differently is just do it myself, and that's what people who want good grades tend to do with group assignments.

I would never be in a comparable situation in my job. If I wasn't getting updates, I'd rectify it quickly because work is a day-to-day thing, bringing concerns to teachers is not a day-to-day thing (unless you're a huge suck up douche).

I mean really, are professors really trying to tell students "haha, do it yourself if you want a good grade, you can't trust your partner, that's why I'm assigning this"? Wouldn't all good group assignments then only be one person's-worth of work?

[–]IHateEveryone3 22 points23 points ago

r, or I could have contacted the professor early and said "I'm worried about my partner," but I'm not sure professors really want that

That's what professors typically want. And even if it isn't in this case, that action would allow you to go to the academic board after the fact and appeal the grade.

[–]atla 3 points4 points ago

Especially if plagiarism is involved. Any semblance of guilt about ratting on someone goes out the window the second they put me in a position where I can get expelled.

[–]DanTheRip 28 points29 points ago

Next time use google docs, I don't know what I'd do with out it, you can see exactly how much work the persons are putting in it.

[–]jimmy_the_tulip 28 points29 points ago

Google Docs will only help when you already have a willing, helpful partner. Otherwise, they will just pretend they don't know how to use Google Docs or just straight out not use it.

There's also the partners that never reply to e-mails and you never see in class. Love those.

[–]raskolnikov- 8 points9 points ago

Well this was in '07 or '08, I dunno if that was around then, but yes I can see that being useful.

[–]devrdander 11 points12 points ago

The reason a lot of companies want people with 4 year degrees regardless of the job is these various lessons you learn in college. You learn teamwork, division of labor, accountability, etc. When you start a group project you need to divide up labor, set time lines for rough drafts or outlines etc, and setup peer reviews. You did none of this and thus got a D. I hate to be the dick but you kind of earned it by not keeping ontop of your partner or reporting her to your prof. In most businesses you keep Email chains for this very reason, to CYOA. The fact you saw none of your partners work on a group project till 1 hour before class shows you didn't do what you were suppose to do.

[–]cortezblackrose 9 points10 points ago

What Pizza Good says is very important... "trust but verify is the mantra of managing anything.

[–]samisbond 6 points7 points ago

Every shitty teaching method is written off as a "life lesson." We get it. Partners usually suck. Now let me learn the material.

[–]roxizzle 2 points3 points ago

True dat. I was on top of everyone's shit whenever I had a group project. They hated me for it but I wasn't about to do all the work.

[–]tocilog 11 points12 points ago

We had someone like this in a group project. We found out he didn't do any work so we kicked him off the group two days before the deadline. I was the one to tell him. Learned what it feels like to fire a guy.

[–]too_many_rules 11 points12 points ago

I got teamed up with a truly incompetent coder while working on my CS masters. During one of our meetings, I just got so frustrated with him that I suggested he just let me do it all, and he agreed. He'd wasted so much of our time at that point that I wasn't able to finish everything. I don't know how he managed to get into a CS program since he didn't seem to understand any programming concepts beyond the rudimentary. The project was worth a large portion of our grade so, in the end, he cost me a letter grade in class.

I could have done the entire project in half the time with far less stress on my own, but the instructor insisted that I had to work in a group. I was getting my masters part-time while working full-time as part of a 120+ person development team, so I didn't really need any training on how to work in a group.

[–]raskolnikov- 13 points14 points ago

Also, he gets to benefit from your work. Perhaps by making the good students do all the work, if they don't want to leave things to their partners, professors are letting unqualified people slip into the workplace with unreasonably high grades. Surely that's not their objective.

I mean, I think a good professor could somehow combine working in groups with personal accountability. Like in science labs, I remember working in groups on something, but everyone turned in separate reports.

[–]jk2470 6 points7 points ago

That does suck, although I had the same experience last semester and although the person a god-awful programmer, he was up-front about it and suggested that he could take care of everything else (some light HTML scripting, writing up the presentations and reports that we had to turn in with the code, and conducting usability tests and creating data) while I would do the actual coding. He actually ended up doing far more work than I did and he was an extremely hard/efficient worker. I think thats what professors want you to get out of group projects but often times you are paired with morons who have no concept of their own abilities. Also taught him some coding along the way and he was making progress by the end. I am an undergrad though I cant believe someone would get into a Master's program with those skills.

[–]KunduzCity2012 5 points6 points ago

This was my first experience with a group project in college. Freshmen year, first semester, introductory religion class. The class covered Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. The rest of the "minor" religions were left to group projects presented throughout the last quarter of the class. I had a group with 3 seniors and we got the Greek Pantheon. Should have been pretty easy - divided up the workload according to the requirements. Checked in regularly with each other via class and e-mail, seemingly no issues. Got together and put the paper together, everything seemed good. Gave the presentation, got an A, turned the paper in. Ohgod. The other 3 guys all copied and pasted from encyclopedia.com and that was it. Spent weeks and weeks fighting to not get expelled. Professor said since we wasted so much of her time, if I wanted an A I would have to redo the entire project myself. I did it and it made me jaded as fuck.

I had another one senior year where out of 5 people, 1 guy met me once, he was too busy otherwise. One girl just stopped answering e-mails or coming to class. Another went on vacation for a month in Mexico in the middle of the semester. A third girl worked with me half-assed over e-mail and assigned herself the task of writing my presentation on big index cards even though I had a PowerPoint. The guy showed up the day of the presentation and stood behind us and said nothing. The professor was amazing though - half of the points came from his assessment and half came from our individual assessments of each other. I met with him in his office for a few years and got an A, e-mail girl got a C, busy guy had to write a 20 page paper to get a C, vacation girl failed the class and the last girl dropped off the face of the planet.

[–]captain_obvious_scum 0 points1 point ago

So 3 dumbass seniors would plagiarize? LOL they didn't want to graduate huh?

Also in your 2nd class, shit like that happens. Even in my high school years where group projects were the fucking dumbest things ever.

[–]lollermittens 8 points9 points ago

Why didn't you escalate this issue to the dean? All parties are at fault here:

  1. You were at fault. The moment you suspected dubious/shady behavior from your roommate, you need to bring up this issue to the teacher and see his response.

  2. The teacher is at fault. His/her inability (or unwillingness) to successfully micro-manage each group for a project he/she designed solely rests on the teacher's shoulders. I often hate group projects at the university level because teachers often come up with a half-assed/badly written project framework, throw it on your lap, say "e-mail me or contact me at any time if you need help," and that's about it. Those are the worst things you could do as a project manager and teachers often to a terrible job at managing their students correctly.

  3. Last but not least, your shitty teammate deserves the majority of the blame. I already insinuated that you should escalate this issue to the dean of the school. Schedule a meeting, tell him/her what happened and explain carefully why having a D on your report card might seriously jeopardize getting a job offer with prestigious <insert corporation name here>.

This is important. You need to teach your teammate a lesson that he/she won't forget so that he/she won't get the chance to fuck up someone else's education.

[–]EverythingIsPhysics 14 points15 points ago

Professor here. We know this full well. It was true when we were students too. We do it because learning autonomy in not ideal group situations is important. Learning to be a leader is important. Making less grading for us is important (but the other reasons are good too).

[–]Rhakan 10 points11 points ago

We do it because learning autonomy in not ideal group situations is important.

Then why is doing all of your work while your partner flakes rewarded with a D? Surely, the student learned the lesson and this should be graded appropriately?

Perhaps you're confusing "teaching life lessons" with "passing off poor instruction and a bad curriculum as teaching 'life lessons'." I'm also somewhat curious as to why you think that the course is supposed to teach 'life lessons' rather than anything described in the course catalog. Sure, some real-world lessons are always a good thing if you can work them in, but to allow them to dominate a student's grade is simply ridiculous.

[–]Tokio13 0 points1 point ago

Well, if the project didn't get completed then of course you'd get a bad grade.

Thread OP should have had regular communication with her/her partner, and should have seen the work BEFORE it was due. If it was not done well, then he/she should have done it or informed the teacher before hand.

You don't just sit around and HOPE your partner does their work. You actively stay in contact, you demand to see the work, and you inform the teacher before the due date of any issues.

As for WHY they teach 'life lessons' it is because they are helping you prepare for getting a job. Knowing the material isn't the only important part.

I know at my school we were told that businesses had complained that many people could not work well in a team. So, my school put a lot of focus on team work so that we would be what businesses are looking for. Nearly every class I was in had a group project.

[–]raskolnikov- 22 points23 points ago

Well I was a TA in a class while I was a law student and the professor gave me almost complete discretion in grading. My objective was to accurately grade the students based on their grasp of the material, not teach them life lessons about leadership while at the same time making their individual grades less accurate and less fair. So I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on what college educators should be doing.

[–]BeanDom 3 points4 points ago

Another not-really-a-professor- here. (I teach 17-19 y olds)

If you are teaching autonomy, you should grade them in that subject. If you are teaching physics you should grade them in that subject.

You are an A student in physics? I don't care. You get an F on your assignment anyway, because I paired you up with two shitheads.

It doesn't fly in my book.

[–]spectrem 3 points4 points ago

I always just assumed the last part was true.

[–]Freudeschoner 3 points4 points ago

If you do it because you want to teach students about one of the many ways that aren't ideal to learn, while they're paying to learn, then you really are as stupid and incompetent as I'd given you credit for. Admit it, you clowns resent having to spend time dealing with students in a world that isn't lining up to pay you for your personal research, and while regularly versed in the subject material you are often unsuited for a teaching roll.

[–]FourteenHatch 11 points12 points ago

Part of doing your project was to document who did what and when.

You didn't , so you share the blame.

Sounds like you learned a lot from that experience.

[–]AngryDelphiDev 11 points12 points ago

Its not often I feel the need to chime in: but this is absolutely the wrong response. Group projects in a higher education setting are generally a complete waste of time. They don't teach you as much as doing (a smaller) assignment yourself and they don't teach you teamwork in the real world (where you have the ability to extend deadlines, reassign teammates and generally deal with the shit falling down the hill in a productive manner.)

In my general experience throughout college/graduate school the only good team projects were projects that could only be done as a team project (create a theatrical production, an architect and engineer working together to design a bridge, a group of musicians producing a piece of music.) The bad group projects always revolved around doing a paper together--something that just doesn't need to be a team project.

TL;DR; the charts are correct.

[–]sirblastalot 27 points28 points ago

I know teachers love group projects, and I can see why it makes sense: in "the real world" you have to be able to work with a group. There's usually a problem with the execution, though. In the real world, there's a whole hierarchy that divides-up who does what. Not to mention that, hopefully, the people that don't pull their weight get fired.

[–]lollermittens 7 points8 points ago

Most teachers do not have experience in the private sector. They are taught the dynamics of group projects at the graduate level and a lot of their knowledge is theoretical and highly unapliccable to current industry standards.

Just like school barely prepares you for the private sector, group projects do not reflect in any way the dynamic of an enterprise-scale project where a budget is allocated, deadlines constantly change, and requirements are often volatile.

Ultimately, group projects simply decrease the teacher's work load when it comes to correcting papers and also to stabilize the class' grade average.

[–]rudieboyjoe 13 points14 points ago

I think professors like group projects because it cuts down on marking. That is the only possible logic I can see behind it.

[–]darkpaladin 13 points14 points ago

No sirblastalot pretty much hit the nail on the head for the educational logic behind it. It's not like the professor is actually the one grading your project anyway, so they don't really care about how much they assign. But he's also completely right about divided roles, the only way group projects work is when there is a leader/project manager keeping everyone involved on point.

Another key aspect are interim deliverables, set goals and deadlines for individual teams members to assure that they are sitting at the correct point in order for this to work effectively which are outside the deadlines for the overall project. Interestingly a lot of the ideas behind scrumm in programming can be applied to these types of projects.

I wonder about assigning a leader early on with the understanding that they are responsible for the team and as such their grade on the project will have double the weight of everyone else involved.

[–]MyUserNameIsLongerTh 3 points4 points ago

Also, there is pressure on some professors to not fail a lot of people. One way to do this is to have group projects. That way the people that normally would have failed the class, do ok because the others in their group did all the work for them.

[–]mattj7 51 points52 points ago

I'd get in a group project and since I actually did work when I was IN CLASS (never did homework) I'd be like ok lets do this and try and figure out if any of them in the group were actually willing to work, then work with that/those individual(s) and be successful. So group projects taught me the importance of quickly judging who's a lazy fuck and then disregarding them to focus on the productive, contributing people. Wait a minute thats actually a pretty decent life lesson.

[–]so_close_magoo 2 points3 points ago

This is the lesson I now realize I didn't learn. Everyone was frustrated with my focusing on the one jerk in the group unwilling to help, and I ended up taking the hard workers for granted.

In the end, the professor wasn't blind to his laziness, and he got a lower grade. I was just making life more difficult by focusing on him.

[–]JoelLikesPigs 10 points11 points ago

More like: How to get a bunch of shit done while no one else does anything, but still complain when they get a shitty to average grade.

[–]Sharra_Blackfire 7 points8 points ago

Is this SMBC? Kind of looks like Zach's handwriting

[–]bbbbaconstripsEndless Origami 3 points4 points ago

It's actually a webcomic I do called Endless Origami. But me and Zach have pretty similar hand writing.

[–]mermaidbooty 12 points13 points ago

Learned this shit today. Never again!

[–]oh_please_not_again 12 points13 points ago

Oh, you'll trust again. And you'll be shown why you shouldn't again. Such is life.

[–]Sir_Didymus 7 points8 points ago

I trust that you're right. Wait...

[–]dorkofnight 30 points31 points ago

I am a professor and I assign group project. The way I keep this from occurring is by giving the group half of the points for the assignment to assign. I admit that it's rather amusing when a student calls me and asks why he/she got a 50 when the rest of the group got a 100. I then explain that the group decide to not assign that student any points. I also give groups the power to remove anyone who doesn't do the work. This seems to keep the slacking down to a minimum.

[–]thelonelygod 43 points44 points ago

I had a prof do this once. Didn't work since 3 people were slackers and all gave each other max marks.

[–]The_MAZZTer 7 points8 points ago

Yay democracy.

[–]The_Law_of_Pizza 6 points7 points ago

ANY system where a third party student's actions get factored into my permanent grades is fucked up and wrong.

[–]Im_smarter_than_you 4 points5 points ago

This is a slight improvement, but won't work if there is a group member who doesn't like you for one reason or another.

In a group of four, maybe take the highest two peer evaluations and drop the lowest..

[–]sebzim4500 1 point2 points ago

Couldn't you just let people pick their own partners?

[–]ARoyaleWithCheese 6 points7 points ago

Just finished a group project today, I was basically leading a group of 8 people (because I'm the most experienced/most knowledgeable) who didn't give a single fucking fuck. I had to send back the same papers to the same people multiple fucking times because apparently: "It really needs to be AT LEAST two/three pages, if it's less, you're doing something wrong" sounds a lot like: "Yeah, half a page is totally fine."

Everyone was just being dicks and assholes and stupid as fuck, had to check almost daily on people to make sure they staid kind of sorta on schedule and didn't completely fuck up. Had to explain everything to them multiple times because apparently that's what I'm supposed to do as a student and in the end it the paper still sucked and I had to spend hours to make it somewhat decent.

What does the professor say to all of this? Well fuck him that asshole. Told me that it's part of being a leader (managing unmotivated, uncooperative and plain dumb people) and that in the real would I'd have to deal with this too. NO. NO THOSE PEOPLE WOULD GET FIRED FROM THEIR FUCKING JOBS, OKAY.

Worst part is because I was trying to make the paper a good one I unintentionally became the only one doing something and thus the leader, and got all of the fucking blame.

Bullshit I tell you, it's complete and utter fucking bullshit.

Just as clarification: not everyone in my group sucked. Two of the eight (excluding me) were cool people with whom I could work well and who did their jobs well. I also didn't get to choose the people in my group, we were assigned by the teacher.

[–]jester805 15 points16 points ago

Kind of like 6 SIGMA

[–]trout45 25 points26 points ago

The Six Sigmas (according to 30 Rock):

  • Teamwork
  • Insight
  • Brutality
  • Male Enhancement
  • Handshakefulness
  • Play Hard

[–]canadian_stig 2 points3 points ago

I always though the Six Sigmas were:

  • Delegate
  • The
  • Work
  • To
  • Someone
  • Else

[–]Slopples 5 points6 points ago

Every time I saw a group assignment on a syllabus I wanted to shoot myself in the face.

[–]paranoka 5 points6 points ago

I have a friend who got pissed off at the fact that he was doing all the work and none of his group partners were doing anything, so he wrote only his name on the project. He got a 100 and they all got a 0.

[–]SpaceManAndy 10 points11 points ago

I think group projects teach you exactly what they are supposed to: That working with other people is hard, but you have to make it work. After school, in the workforce, very few lucky people get to work completely on their own. The rest of us need to work with other people to get things done. Some of them are great, others you have to stay on them the whole time, and others you find ways to work around. Welcome to life.

[–]lollermittens 2 points3 points ago

Group projects are an introduction to working within a group. You're taught the basics: organization; human interaction; compromise; and how to apply some of your skills.

The dynamics present in a large-scale enterprise project are not even comparable with the dynamics observed at your average, run-of-the-mill group project.

[–]nofelix 2 points3 points ago

Indeed, and on top of that many of the problems of a college group project aren't present in the workplace.

[–]rific 17 points18 points ago

It's the worst when your teacher/professor does not compensate for introverts. SOME PEOPLE CAN'T SIMPLY GET UP AND FIND A PARTNER YOU BASTARDS

[–]patentpending 5 points6 points ago

Yes they can. A good way is to just wait about 2 mins and when it's meant to be a group of 4 or something then just go over to the smartest looking group of 3 and ask to join. If you can't do this it's because you've got a medical condition, not because you're introverted.

[–]FQuist 7 points8 points ago

Sounds slightly more serious than introversion...

[–]Goldenbaumsteinowitz 2 points3 points ago

Fellow introvert here: You can't act like an introvert if you want to be successful. People want sociable go-getters who wake up at 6am and drink lots of coffee. It's just the way it is. Sooner you except that, the better. The world will not change for us.

[–]ColdBeerz 30 points31 points ago

So, so true.

[–]Kingbrandon 11 points12 points ago

So, so, so true.

[–]Cynikal818 6 points7 points ago

Really? Whenever I did/do group project we always would meet up and make sure everything was tight and good to go. Why wouldn't you do this? Did you guys really just do only your part and only get together at the very end? Seems kind of foolish to me...can't really blame anyone but yourself for that.

My groups and I would always meet periodically at the library or wherever was convenient. If a person was unwilling to cooperate, the rest of the group would go up to the teacher and explain the situation. I'm not going to let some fucker mess up my chance of transferring to a good school.

[–]Tokio13 0 points1 point ago

I agree. It sounds like a lot of redditors don't know how to work in a group.

I did a LOT of group projects in college, had one in pretty much every class. We'd have a group leader, exchange emails/phone numbers, and find time to meet together.

During our meetings we'd assign roles, share the work we've done, and try to problem solve issues we were having.

If there was a person (or more) who wasn't doing work then we would know about that person ahead of time due to their lack of doing anything so far. We could then take that persons assigned work and have someone else do it, or break it out amongst multiple people.

No matter what, everything would get done. None of this nonsense about waiting until the project is due to realize half the project isn't finished.

Communicate communicate communicate.

[–]nofelix 3 points4 points ago

the rest of the group would go up to the teacher and explain the situation.

Unfortunately most teachers don't want to handle group members who don't do their share of the work.

[–]jimmy_the_tulip 3 points4 points ago

This is why good professors will require a portion of the submitted report state specifically what each group member did on group projects. But, some professors are just lazy. Sure, it's a life lesson...the first time! But for the 20+ group projects you will do throughout a university career after that first one...you know it's going to happen and there's not a damn thing you can do about it.

[–]what_the_phooks 3 points4 points ago

Group projects where groups were randomly assigned often turned out like this...but the few times we were able to select our own groups were the best especially in upper level classes where you knew who the hard workers/leaders were and could get them to join you to form super groups.

[–]tsahyt 3 points4 points ago

"Teamwork" and "Trust no one" are synonyms anyway.

[–]tdotgoat 2 points3 points ago

pfff, I already knew this from watching the X Files

[–]jbd1986 2 points3 points ago

Senior Design... One dude shows up to no meetings, does no work, utterly bombs his part of the presentations... and somehow still graduates with an EE degree....

[–]llamamymama 0 points1 point ago

Valuable life lesson.

[–]dominicl14 0 points1 point ago

DayZ

[–]morton3 2 points3 points ago

This is entirely the professor's fault. It seems to me that teachers especially in college have no idea how to assign a group project. Don't give a group project designed for 3 people to a group of 5. Professors always make a final paper due with the project too. You can't write a paper between 5 fucking people that's not how it works. Professors need to design group projects where its actually helpful to have a few extra people working with you.

[–]Misc_Rodriguez 2 points3 points ago

I've sunk many a fellow student by ratting them out for being lazy fucks. No regrets.

[–]UUGE_ASSHOLE 1 point2 points ago

THIS!!!

I remember my last college group project was some communication class bullshit. We were basically given carte blanche to do any type of ~15 minute presentation in front of the class, only requirement is it had to be based in communication in some way. So the list of suggested topics handed out were just painfully horrible. After batting around a couple other shitty ideas I come up with the idea of how technology (and social networking) is changing the way we communicate. Each of us had a specific topic and we were supposed to talk for 3-5 minutes about basic info and how their topic (cellphones/text, email, facebook, twitter, video chat) changed (or is changing) the way we communicate. Easiest bullshit assignment evvvvvvver.

So 1 week before presentations are supposed to start two of the girls come up to me and say "We dont know how we are supposed to talk for 3 minutes about our topics (smart phones + facebook)". I roll my eyes and they continue along with "We think you three should continue on as is (Email, twitter, Skype/Video) and then in the middle of your presentation (twitter) I am going to pretend to send Becky a text saying how confused I am and that I have no idea whats going on. We will then change topics and we will do a separate presentation about "Poor communication in a group project" and talk about how stupid this idea was and how you came up with this idea and tricked us into agreeing and how much it sucks." ಠ_ಠ

Lost my mind. I had already come up with the powerpoint to go along with the project (took me at least 8 minutes), we were more or less all ready to go and they drop this bullshit. I eventually got to go back to finish up but thinking back to nightmares like that makes it tough.

[–]afcagroo 0 points1 point ago

Then group projects have taught you a valuable life lesson. I had to learn that one on the job. Fortunately, I had an experience in my first week that taught me that lesson, plus a similar (but equally important lesson). I have distilled these lessons into two simple rules that have served me well over the years:

  1. Trust no one.
  2. Trust nothing.

(House hadn't been on yet when I started my professional life. Otherwise I could have just learned those things from watching TV.)

[–]besmirzanaj -1 points0 points ago

Every. F**ing. Time

[–]CaptainShanks 3 points4 points ago

I think what their really trying to teach you is "get used to making the best of working with shitty people, because you will deal with them in almost every job ever".

[–]sickoldman123 3 points4 points ago

I hated this at school and how grades actually depended on it. Why the fuck should my grade rely on some other fuckwit?!

In one lesson, I sent an entire section of a presentation to a girl for her to compile it with hers and two other people's.

Came to presentation day, and my slides weren't there. Nor were the other two people's. I stood there in front of a classful of people, baffled as I looked at foreign subjects. The girl we emailed it to had made her own slides. "Where is your input, Sickman?" "Well, she... it's not... there..."

D.

Cunt.

[–]rick_22 2 points3 points ago

This is the main lesson to teamwork anyway...

[–]49erShark 0 points1 point ago

This is so true. I would have gotten a 4.0 GPA in my masters courses if not for the group project in the first class I took. I had a partner that asked us to do specific things and was acting as a leader. I complied and did all my parts. At the end of the project the ASSHOLE told the teacher that he did the project without any help. I showed the teacher things I sent as proof (WTF I HAD TO PROVE I DID SOMETHING?!?!) and he gave me a B in the class. I understand that may not be frustrating to many others but I paid over $30,000 for this masters program and worked my ass of to try and get a 4.0 only to end up with 3.8-3.9. you simply cannot brag about less than a 4.0....