top 200 commentsshow all 497

[–]Beaglepower 952 points953 points ago

This is an Erlenmeyer flask. You wouldn't cook in one of these. An Erlenmeyer flask is for general mixing and titration. You do not apply heat to an Erlenmeyer flask. That's what the boiling flask is for. Did you not learn anything in my chemistry class?

You and I will not make garbage. We will produce a chemically pure and stable product that performs as advertised. No adulterants. No baby formula. No chili powder.

[–]ALLGAM3R 446 points447 points ago

But Chili P is my thing Mr. White.

[–]UnassumingSingleGuy 245 points246 points ago

Not anymore.

[–]hasteveil 210 points211 points ago

[–]majicpowaz 44 points45 points ago

That was a weird part of the show, when he went all burnout and invited homeless people into his house.

[–]JonnieGoodboyTyler 45 points46 points ago

Was a great part of the show.

[–]inked-up 33 points34 points ago

Every part was great

[–]BlindStark 3 points4 points ago

YEAAAH, BITCH!

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points ago

Is anyone jizzing their pants in excitement for the new episodes? I can barely contain my jizz. Jizz everywhere.

[–]mishiesings 2 points3 points ago

Have you every been to a drug house? The show was extremely accurate. (except for the having lots of money part)

[–]mooselmo 17 points18 points ago

Is he throwing meth in the air?

[–]HMPoweredMan 50 points51 points ago

money

[–]ArtisticAquaMan 4 points5 points ago

Upvote because of breaking bad and upvote because its an awesome GIF.

[–]elusivewater 25 points26 points ago

Apply yourself Jesse.

[–]Capn_Cook 4 points5 points ago

That's my signature, YO! Sorry, but you got busted, Emilio, and I got to escape through a window.

[–]SirDerpingtonThe3rd 74 points75 points ago

Is this from that show, Breaking Benjamin?

[–]mb9023 22 points23 points ago

close enough.

[–]KingNick 4 points5 points ago

I love the episode where Breaking Bad does the soundtrack

[–]mijsga 15 points16 points ago

You are half right. We actually heat or boil chemical reagent in erlenmeyer flask (for a relative short time). The shape of the neck was designed to reduce the rate of evaporation, also some titrations require elevated temperature.

[–]sstevee 18 points19 points ago

You do not apply heat to an Erlenmeyer flask

Using an Erlenmeyer flask instead of a beaker during recrystallization will result in less product loss due to the increased surface area the vapor has to condense on.

[–]captainAwesomePants 3 points4 points ago

Not a beaker, a boiling flask. A boiling (or "florence") flask is good for evenly applying heat.

[–]icyshadows 3 points4 points ago

But you do not keep prolonged contact to the heat source with the Erlenmeyer, the best technique is to boil (if possible) the required solvent and add as much as will dissolve the crude product into the Erlenmeyer.

Technically you are not heating the Erlenmeyer with the exception to mediate the temperature while you add more solvent.

[–]elizabethan 11 points12 points ago

I really need to watch Breaking Bad, apparently.

[–]Ign0ranceIsBliss 10 points11 points ago

You're missing out. Its the best show on tv, only rivaled by The Wire. Get on Netflix and binge that shit. For science...

[–]Strangely_Calm 1 point2 points ago

The mercury fulminate scene comes to mind.

[–]modeerfcity 7 points8 points ago

did i come to /r/science ?

[–]llblyndll 23 points24 points ago

[–]FryGuy1013 12 points13 points ago

It's a quote from the first episode of Breaking Bad when Jesse brings back the wrong kind of flask to use in cooking meth.

[–]Hesho95 8 points9 points ago

Ah, Walter back before he became the Heisenberg we know now. The change he went through is astounding!

[–]Marcob10 7 points8 points ago

He's still pretty strict on protocols though. Even when cooking inside soon to be fumigated houses.

[–]TheUltimateSalesman 2 points3 points ago

It always bothers me when people aren't using RBFs and are using conicals for boiling. Or worse yet, not following lab procedures in the kitchen. They should offer some course for people that aren't in college anymore but want to keep doing chem.

[–]jebus01 5 points6 points ago

My name is Erlend. The guy who came up with the flask had my name. Finally something for me to be proud of.

[–]Raider61 1 point2 points ago

Volumetric flask

FTFY

[–]bishopsfinger 37 points38 points ago

She's holding an Erlenmeyer. A volumetric flask looks like this. Sincerely, -a chemist

[–]Tsara_Noga 18 points19 points ago

She's also holding a volumetric.

[–]bishopsfinger 13 points14 points ago

Huh. You're right, and I'm blind.

[–]Tsara_Noga 19 points20 points ago

Only to wavelengths between 600 and 700nm. It's a small range.

[–]bishopsfinger 2 points3 points ago

I approve of your Gleebin.

[–]majicpowaz 1 point2 points ago

I wish there were more intelligent threads like this.

[–]Tsara_Noga 2 points3 points ago

I've got your back.

[–]SweetNeo85 9 points10 points ago

Yeah but the original Breaking Bad quote is about a volumetric flask. That's what Raider61 was "fixing".

[–]bishopsfinger 6 points7 points ago

True, but I thought Beaglepower altered the quote to match the picture.

[–]SweetNeo85 6 points7 points ago

...he did.

[–]Bozotclown 8 points9 points ago

Unfortunately it makes no sense because you actually would apply heat to a conical flask.

[–]th3virus 67 points68 points ago

Guys, calm down. This didn't actually happen. If you look close enough, you can see a stock image watermark.

[–]DESTROYER3264 27 points28 points ago

Wow. I had to go back to notice it. Good catch.

[–][deleted] 266 points267 points ago

So, is Tumblr the new place to get karma from?

[–]gummywormsyum 89 points90 points ago

I hear karma tumbles right down from the mountains of Nepal in those mines

[–]Kubaker1 28 points29 points ago

I hear there's karma just lying in the rivers there, just waiting to be plucked right out!

[–]yangar 7 points8 points ago

Nepal.gif. Make sure the colors are oversaturated for good measure.

[–]RationalArgumentMan 58 points59 points ago

Here's what I don't understand about redditors... You all claim that karma is meaningless, but then you get upset when posts like this (reposts from other websites like Tumblr, Facebook, 4chan, etc...) get tons of (meaningless) karma.

It's not about the karma, and if something does happen to get karma, all that says is that a lot of people found the post to be entertaining. You guys make way too big of a deal over silly karma.

[–]SheepHoarder 7 points8 points ago

The funny thing is that posting about karma typically yields karma.

[–]farkdog 10 points11 points ago

It's like beauty. Everyone claims it doesn't really matter.

Until they are lacking it or someone has more of it than they do.

TL;DR It matters.

[–]fiction8 17 points18 points ago

The numbers don't matter, the unnecessary visibility matters.

It's taking up a spot at the top that could be going to something new or funny.

[–]RationalArgumentMan 31 points32 points ago

I get that, but at the same time it's pretty clear that a lot of people found this to be funny.

[–]Spoggerific 15 points16 points ago

Well, they're wrong. I am the king of humor and I decide what is acceptable to laugh at.

[–]KaptainKarmel 0 points1 point ago

Unfortunately, the masses often find stupid, easy to digest, content to be funny.

This post is fine though, I just think people like to bitch about things being posted here from other site's comment sections.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

I think of karma as a ends to a mean. I want a lot of people to see what I post. For a lot of people to see what I post I need a lot of karma, so I want karma. It is not meangless in that sense.

[–]Lord_Purple_ 12 points13 points ago

It's a place where funny things are happening, so are getting posted here. It's almost as if that is what this site is supposed to be for.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

I made a joking comment about how many funny things from there I've been seeing on here. It's almost as if that is what comments are supposed to be for.

[–]therealjoekony 93 points94 points ago

Nasal orifice? It's called a nose.

[–]BaconCat 64 points65 points ago

Smell-holes 'round these parts. Not to be confused with smelly-holes.

[–]leeum12345 3 points4 points ago

I chuckled.

[–]shadow1515 12 points13 points ago

The fumes probably won't hurt the nose, we're concerned about them getting into the orifice.

[–]SweetNeo85 4 points5 points ago

Nose? It's called a head.

[–]cakekween 5 points6 points ago

Not if you want some ph(d) it isn't.

[–]ThatguyJake 2 points3 points ago

Or nares

[–]gologologolo 6 points7 points ago

Or nostrils

[–]ThatguyJake 9 points10 points ago

Or boogertunnels

[–]fairwayks 34 points35 points ago

OMG, she's about to make a cherry Coke. I only have a G.E.D and even I can do that! (And I never wear gloves or goggles....sheeesh!)

[–]jackcatalyst 24 points25 points ago

Carol never wore her safety goggles.....

[–]theNightblade 25 points26 points ago

NOW SHE DOESN'T NEED ANY

DUN DUN DUUUUUUUUUUN

[–]DanaKaZ 150 points151 points ago

FYI: unless the safety report on the compounds you work with explicitly states it, don't wear gloves.

[–]link287 89 points90 points ago

I'll be that guy, Why?

[–]SaneNutter 153 points154 points ago

You wear your gloves for dangerous things. They get dangerous things on them. You don't want to get the dangerous things all over your safe things.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]CuriousCetacean 55 points56 points ago

As someone who works with RNA, I can confirm this.

[–]whiteboy1190 36 points37 points ago

As someone who knows very little about RNA, I can take your word for it.

[–]ShadyG 26 points27 points ago

As someone who knows next to nothing about chemistry or biochem, I'm pretty much just wasting time here.

[–]notices_boobs 6 points7 points ago

RNase away on everything, especially the undergrads.

[–]EskNerd 5 points6 points ago

As someone who contains RNA, I can't really confirm much.

[–]1eejit 3 points4 points ago

RNA isn't usually handled in a volumetric flask. Epis ftw.

[–]irrelevant_spiderman 7 points8 points ago

I'm with you, I don't care about dangerous things, I just don't want RNAses all up in my shit.

[–]shadow1515 3 points4 points ago

I used to work with DNA. I went through so many gloves.

[–]nainalerom 25 points26 points ago

Also, they are useful for sterile technique. When the things on your hands are dangerous for experiment.

[–]Tactful 22 points23 points ago

They're also useful for cold weather, when you don't want your hands and fingers to feel a bit cold.

[–]popiyo 4 points5 points ago

Or when you have a high level of precision and the weight of your fingerprint matters.

[–]elevul 6 points7 points ago

Don't you use mono-use gloves?

[–]wigglemytoes 5 points6 points ago

Um, that's why you change your gloves frequently.

[–]fancy-chips 2 points3 points ago

Change gloves?? What the hell. I am a biologist and I change gloves like 15 times per day

[–]madplayshd 3 points4 points ago

Gloves give you a wrong feeling of beeing 'clean'. You are'nt clean when you first put them on, and as soon as you touch anthing on the outside, your gloves are contaminated and if you work in analysis that sucks (there obviously are situations where you should wear gloves - sometimes even to the elbow). However, if you wear gloves, you will be tempted to think "ah what the hell, I am wearing gloves!" and ruin all the work you did that day. You immediately notice when something touches your hands and wash them, you just dont care when it touches your gloves and dont swap them for a new pair.

Gloves give you a wrong feeling of safety. If you wear gloves the whole day, you tend to feel safer, but you arent neccessarily. Compared to people who only put on gloves when working with dangerous stuff and have the association gloves = danger.

Gloves can sometimes be dangerous. Dont go near burners with gloves. They melt with your skin.

Gloves are often unnecessary. When the substance isnt dangerous on skin contact, there is no reason to wear gloves. Chances are you get some of the substance on your glove and dont care, distributing it evenly everywhere in the lab.

Gloves can combust when they come into contact with nitric acid.

[–]patefoisgras 2 points3 points ago

Sounds like a rookie mistake. No reason to default to not wearing gloves in lieu of the opposite.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

[–]alltat 16 points17 points ago

Because you're more likely to slip and drop something if you wear gloves. Because wearing gloves for eight hours is uncomfortable. Because if you spill something (like acid) that'll go through the gloves, you just make the damage worse by making it harder to wash off. Because if you touch something hot with gloves, the gloves will melt into your skin, making the burns far worse. Because if you spill something minor on your hands, it's better to notice right away and wash it off than to walk around the rest of the day with contaminated gloves, spreading it everywhere. The list goes on.

You should look up the hazards of each chemical you work with in advance, so if anything actually warrants using gloves (a lot of stuff does), you'll know. Then you put on gloves for that, do it, and take them off right away.

[–]senanabs 63 points64 points ago

Seriously who wears the same pair of gloves all day long? I work in a lab and I go through several pairs of gloves during the day. You get acid on your glove you get a new pair. The regular nitrile gloves do not melt into your skin unless it's very very high temperature. If that's the case then there's burn proof gloves, and if needed cut proof gloves.

[–]strickjd 57 points58 points ago

Yes. I work in a lab as well, really confused by this thread. ALWAYS wear gloves. ALWAYS change gloves. These people don't know what they're talking about.

[–]willyolio 7 points8 points ago

must be the same people who mouth pipetted often enough that they had to make a rule against it...

seriously, you can make bullshit excuses all day if you want but who the fuck has so little common sense after working in the scientific field for so long?

[–]Daakuryu 6 points7 points ago

but who the fuck has so little common sense

I have a saying I've been using for years due to working in tech support.

common sense ain't so common.

[–]creamengine 2 points3 points ago

who the fuck has so little common sense after working in the scientific field for so long?

Absolutely everybody.

[–]madplayshd 2 points3 points ago

The word ALWAYS is almost always wrong. Of course there are cases where no gloves are better. For example you dont necessarily wear gloves in mass spectrography preperation while putting the probes into the final bottles. They give you the wrong feeling of beeing clean when really your hands, gloves or not, are dirty as hell (from an MS standpoint) anyway. So you may touch stuff where you shouldnt and still think its ok. Wearing gloves does not help you in this situation at all. They increase the chance of crosscontamination, not only in ms.

There are times where wearing gloves is uneccessary, so why wear them?

There are times where wearing nitril gloves can be dangerous, for example working with burners.

I dont know if you actually studied chemistry or just work in a lab, you will find out that there are plenty of people, not only students, at the university who not always wear gloves, only when necessary. Its also psychological, wearing gloves is associated with danger, not safety which happens when you wear them the whole day.

[–]theNightblade 25 points26 points ago

FYI: Basically every single MSDS for regular everyday solvent and reagents at the lab that I work in says hand/eye protection is necessary. DI water is pretty much the only thing that doesn't.

Also FYI: I still don't wear gloves that often. Acetone, Methanol, Acetonitrile, IPA, and a lot of other reagents evaporate before they can do anything other than smell bad. If I'm working with any acids, bases, or solvents like DMSO, DCM, Toluene, THF, or who knows how many other things, I'll be wearing gloves.

Plus, if you're wearing gloves that are actually the correct size for your hand - and aren't a complete nincompoop - then you're not more likely to drop what you're working with.

[–]excusemeplease 14 points15 points ago

FYI: we still wear gloves even when the safety report doesn't state anything because we don't like to get shit on our hands. Chemicals and biological solutions often smell weird, and even if they don't I don't want my hands bathing in wet stuff for the same reason professional dishwashers wear gloves when they wash dishes all day.

[–]johnwandering 8 points9 points ago

Yeah, it's the same hands that we eat and touch our cell phones with. It might not at all be dangerous, but I don't like getting salt and yeast solutions all over my hands.

[–]lizzyborden42 9 points10 points ago

Gloves aren't always to protect you from something. Usually I wear nitrile gloves so that I don't transfer something to whatever I am making and fuck it up.

[–]strickjd 29 points30 points ago

I work in a lab. ALWAYS wear gloves.

[–]Cryptic0677 10 points11 points ago

Working in semiconductor fabrication you do. Even if the chemical is safe, you dont want to contaminate whatever you are working on.

[–]cstbkl42088 13 points14 points ago

You know Carol never wore her safety glasses either. I hear she is blind now.

[–]rock-it-science 8 points9 points ago

At least now she doesn't need them.

[–]ogotrice 40 points41 points ago

Reminds me of this

[–]jimyin 2 points3 points ago

Casual racism. No set-up required.

[–]YoIQuit 1 point2 points ago

bing bang boom

[–]doomgiver98 21 points22 points ago

Who says the fumes are toxic? Can people really tell what chemicals they are just by looking at the colour?

[–]pvuong85 36 points37 points ago

You can't and you won't. But generally speaking, you treat everything as dangerous. Things can be unlabeled or mislabeled all the time. Shit happens in a laboratory, and you don't want to be one of the stories that people tell to scare future generation of students

edit: I forgot to add that it depends on what you're potentially working with also

[–]nainalerom 18 points19 points ago

No. If there is anything that is unlabeled or mislabeled in your lab, get the fuck out. That is NOT something that happens in a professional lab; you should be able to trust your labels.

[–]pvuong85 7 points8 points ago

Lol. Like I said, shit happens. Just because everything is automated, doesn't mean there isn't any mistakes. Not every lab is automated either, so that's grounds for even more mistakes. The reason for rules and regulations, is to fix and prevent mistakes that has and may happen in a lab. Just because you work in a professional lab does not exempt you from any accidents. Humans make mistakes all the time

edit: I'm sure you're able to find a ton about accidents in a 'professional' lab by doing a simple search. If accidents didn't happen, there would be no need to stress about safety, accuracy and all that junk all the time.

[–]nainalerom 8 points9 points ago

I never said anything about automation...

I'm all for safety. But you shouldn't have to do all of your experiments in the fume hood because you might be using a mislabeled chemical. If you're not 100% sure, you shouldn't be using it all. It's as simple as that.

It is unprofessional to tolerate an environment where there are potentially dangerous chemicals left unlabeled or mislabeled. That's what I meant by professional; I was talking about an attitude, not a type of lab.

Those accidents happen because people use mislabeled chemicals. In labs where everything is properly labeled, shit doesn't happen.

[–]pvuong85 0 points1 point ago

Well, I agree with you there. I worked inside a lab of a hospital that was considered one of the "best" in the area. The way they did things I was quite uncomfortable with. I wouldn't tolerate unidentified chemicals, but all I was trying to say was that it does happen

[–]yglm2 50 points51 points ago

Get that bitch some safety. Bitches love safety.

[–]jakfischer 6 points7 points ago

I took that bitches safety off, bitches love weapons free.

[–]BearsAreCool 5 points6 points ago

If she wants the D she'd better use protection.

[–]OpticalDelusion 0 points1 point ago

I hate when people say shit like "nasal orifice" to try and sound smart. Fuckin dumb.

[–]TheCatapult 7 points8 points ago

Here we have Carol, right before the terrible accident that took her sight.

[–]ZachChaos 6 points7 points ago

Is this what /r/funny has become? Shitty Tumblr posts?

[–]splagelouf 0 points1 point ago

nasal orifice.

[–]Alienkid -1 points0 points ago

She want's the ph Deez NUTS!!

[–]stoptalkingplease 3 points4 points ago

I believe she's about to make coca cola.

[–]lucidlemming 4 points5 points ago

He's right, but you know he's just a pretentious dick when he says nasal orifice instead of just "nose".

[–]Snipey 6 points7 points ago

the pretty huge(dick)?

[–]SCHROEDINGERS_UTERUS 4 points5 points ago

Not everything requires glasses and a fume hood... That it is in a chemical-looking container doesn't make it horribly dangerous.

[–]One-Real-Asshole 1 point2 points ago

Spoken like a real highschool student that just finished his/her basic chemistry course.

[–]alltat 1 point2 points ago

Clearly written by someone who has never done lab work with anything dangerous. It seems based on the assumption that "all chemicals are dangerous" and that people have no idea what they're doing. Anyone who actually works with dangerous chemicals will know the specific dangers of each chemical they work with.

  1. You don't wear normally wear gloves. Gloves are annoying. If the stuff is toxic, you'd know.
  2. Safety glasses are normally worn, but there are exceptions. No point if there are no harmful stuff around.
  3. You can't always do everything in a fume hood, for practical reasons.
  4. The volume in the e-flask is excessive, but not dangerously so. Not really an issue, especially not if she's cleaning it.
  5. Most liquids don't give off any noxious fumes. If they do, you'd know.

[–]senanabs 13 points14 points ago

I work R&D for the biggest consumer goods manufacture in the world and safety glasses are always a MUST every time you step into a lab. No exceptions even if there aren't any harmful material around.

[–]Shavetheweasel 2 points3 points ago

It looks like she's preparing some grape drank

[–]treesoclock 1 point2 points ago

You ruined the joke before it began, OP.

[–]STYLIE -1 points0 points ago

Jesus... all that, she just wanted a cherry coke, step off...

[–]defenestrator828 -1 points0 points ago

Not to mention pouring/mixing at or above eye-level.

[–]Carpenarem -1 points0 points ago

You make me touch your hands for stupid reasons.

[–]J_da -1 points0 points ago

Nasal Orifice

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

Lisa Kudrow is Phoebe from Friends in the Breaking Bad spin-off: Gilligan's Island

[–]ForIvadell -1 points0 points ago

PhD? More like poor hungry doctor, amirite?

[–]arthurpaliden -1 points0 points ago

She is making cheery flavored coffee.

[–]crow_road -1 points0 points ago

No phd on health and safety grounds?

Has it come to this?

[–]john0703 -1 points0 points ago

It's basic chemistry Jesse

[–]modeerfcity -1 points0 points ago

this is the TOP post on r/funny..... this is just sad

[–]DaBigSpenDawg -1 points0 points ago

And of course the D she's asking for in her mouth.

[–]HarleyLowSpeed 0 points1 point ago

From photographic analysis, the container nearest her nasal orifice is the strawberry flavored douche and the larger container is prune juice enema. She's safe, unless of course she is using both of these products which could indicate moral and social issues - i.e. community pin cushion and triple input.

[–]scotchycaldwell 0 points1 point ago

Way to much gear to make a cherry coke (Roy Rogers)...

[–]Whatnameisnttakenred 1 point2 points ago

Reddit is to Tumblr as Facebook is to Reddit.

[–]cyburai 0 points1 point ago

Since Breaking Bad, everyone is a chemist.

[–]Jepari 1 point2 points ago

[–]aroondeep 0 points1 point ago

Whatever website this is, they have a shitty comment system.

[–]redjello 0 points1 point ago

Can someone explain the funny part?

[–]blacklambgreyfalcon 0 points1 point ago

(ph)D*

[–]helllomoto 0 points1 point ago

This reminds me of the Big Bang theory, and not in a good way.

[–]captainOindustry 0 points1 point ago

she don't know her A, B, C's but she want the D

[–]lostrock 0 points1 point ago

I was expecting the title to be the punchline, as usual. Was happily disappointed.

[–]Piratiko 1 point2 points ago

It was funny until I got to "nasal orifice," at which point I realized the author was trying too hard to sound intellectual, and it kinda ruined it for me.

Just my $.02

[–]sigglet 0 points1 point ago

She should also set the flask on a flat surface before trying to take a measurement.

[–]ObfuscatedMind 0 points1 point ago

since when mixing colored water required all this gear?

[–]LeeohhNIDAS 0 points1 point ago

Don't forget about the open toe shoes, you know shes got it going on.

[–]Wendel 0 points1 point ago

Chemists don't ordinarily wear gloves or use fume hoods unless there are dangerous fumes. Bad rap.

[–]xrelaht 0 points1 point ago

She's a bartender at a science themed bar. The red thing is a shot, the black thing is what it's going to be dropped into. No safety issue here.

[–]peted1884 1 point2 points ago

She's holding an overfilled wide neck Erlenmeyer flask in her left hand and an underfilled volumetric flask in her right hand.

Erlenmeyers are for mixing. Keep the liquid well below the neck so you can get a good swirl with wrist action. The conical base and relatively narrow neck minimize the potention for sloshing solution out while swirling.

Vol flasks are for making accurate dilutions. There is a mark up on the neck to show when you have accurately filled it. The narrow neck improves the sensitivity to volume differences. They are poor for mixing, so they are typically used with stoppers so you can invert the flask repeatedly to mix.

Safety glass for everything are over kill. I think she's just posing in a studio with colored water.

[–]MrDectol 0 points1 point ago

She's just mixing soda, guys

[–]SmokeTreeRideDragons 0 points1 point ago

Sorry for the stupid question, but what site is this?

[–]GMCooper84 0 points1 point ago

It's just kool-aid and grape drink. How bad can this go?

[–]ranchomonkey 0 points1 point ago

I think she wants spanking more than a PhD

[–]sirunclecid -1 points0 points ago

She's probably just mixing soda flavors.

[–]kevers429 -1 points0 points ago

u messed up the title

[–]ponyvolts -1 points0 points ago

The left vessel is a volumetric flask

[–]jensbw -1 points0 points ago

At least Female Computer Engineer actually wears safety glasses when fixing a hard disk defect!

[–]therapisttherapist -1 points0 points ago

What website are these from?

[–]virusys -1 points0 points ago

Am I the only one who noticed the 'dearloserchris'?

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVqhc-8mypQ

[–]SirBillhelm -1 points0 points ago

I can't

[–]kelsifer -1 points0 points ago

I don't understand why someone was posting that stock photo in the first place.

[–]sweetdudesweet -1 points0 points ago

Is it possible to downvote the entire front page? If this post represents the front page of the internet, then the internet needs to go on vacation.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

I wonder what this broad is cooking up in the kitchen.

It looks like something good from that picture.

[–]IAMAmicrowaveAMA -1 points0 points ago

Only on reddit will people find some scientific conversation to make on something that is meant to be funny.

[–]YellowTorpedo -1 points0 points ago

Dat flask.

[–]MontageRyanxD -1 points0 points ago

FUCKING PUNCHLINE IN THE TITLE

[–]jthomassnyder -1 points0 points ago

relax. she is making cherry cola

[–]srikanthb23 -1 points0 points ago

On a sort of related topic I met this girl the other day who told me her gpa was below a 2. She then goes on to tell me she wants a masters in psych and is going to be a therapist.

[–]denvernwbie -1 points0 points ago

from my phd experience, safety equipment always took a back seat

[–]Mike_theBoiler -1 points0 points ago

Bro, do you even science?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points ago

I have a PhD. That is how we mix daiquiris.

[–]Repostalarm -1 points0 points ago

OP, how do you mess up "(ph)D"?

[–]vans1170 0 points1 point ago

for real i will downvote every single fucking tumblr post. if i wanted to see tumblr, i'd go on tumblr.

[–]internetarian 0 points1 point ago

The parenthesis go around the "ph." If you're going to steal from tumblr, do it right.

[–]TypeAvenger 0 points1 point ago

Looks like coke and cool-aid to me. I don't see what the big deal is.